I have a Spectralogic Gator 64K (AIT3) w/ TSM 5.1.7 on W2K.
I have successfully run automated cleaning of my drives from months but
since I upgraded to 5.1.7 from 5.1.6 I will periodicly get an error :
Correct me if I'm wrong, please.
On Microsoft OS;
If you schedule an automatic Archive. The Archive will archive every file every time
that it runs.
I think that archiving would be more functional if it acted similar to the backup
client. The backup client is a set it and forget
it every cli
Correction: my sample schedule definition should have included the
ACTION=ARCHIVE parameter:
DEFINE SCHEDULE STANDARD MYARCHSCHED
ACTION=ARCHIVE
OBJECTS="c:\mydir\ c:\yourdir\"
OPTIONS="-subdir=yes -archmc=myarchmc"
Regards,
Andy
Andy Raibeck
IBM Software Group
Tivoli Stora
Hi...
You may modifiy your existing schedule, complete the following fields:
Action COMMAND
Options -
Objects c:\BackupArch.cmd
Where action=command allow to execut a client operating system command described in
the Objects field.
The c:\BackupArch.cmd is operating system w2k
ARCHIVE operations require one or more file specifications, i.e. "dsmc
archive c:\mydir\ -subdir=yes" or "dsmc archive c:\mydir\ c:\yourdir\
-subdir=yes". Thus when defining schedules on the TSM server, you need to
use the OBJECTS parameter to specify the file specs, and the OPTIONS
parameter to sp
In poking around some more, I found that the TSM Backup-Archive Clients
Install/Users Guide has the "include.archive " statement in
the normal include/exclude file.
I will try this and see if it works.
I can do manual client archives via the GUI so I know archives work.
Thanks for yo
Enviro:
W2K TSM 5.1.6.3
W2K client 5.1.5.15
Client has been backing up normally with schedmode=polling.
I have never used archives before, so I need some help here.
I setup the archive copygroup to keep archives for 2555 days (7 years).
I created an archive schedule and thought that would be i
Yes, but from experience, it will work at 4.2.X...although it is
officially unsupported.
-Lloyd
On Thu, 14 Aug 2003 22:46:03 +0300
Zlatko Krastev <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote thusly:
> --> We're running TSM 4.2.2.12 ...
>
> To get 3590H supported you must reach at least v5.1.6 !!!
> When you reac
Hi,
This is a good question. If you look at the IBM Ultrium Users Guide, on the page 23,
it tells that once you enable the control paths by two drive units, and you see in the
AIX /dev/smc0 and /dev/smc1. You can enable through the Atape device driver, the
alternate pathing feature by doing thi
Miles, ok with you. Sure we will once install new LTO-2 tape libraries, they
allow definition of multiple paths ...
Have a nice week-end,
René LAMBELET
NESTEC SA
GLOBE - Global Business Excellence
Central Support Center
As you have seen you can have two controls paths. Unfortunately only one may be active
at a time. Also there is no automatic failover for the 3584. However, you have done a
good thing. It is good to have two controls paths. Then if there is a failure you can
manually update the control path to t
O.K. folks, this is an old one! TSM server is 4.2.3.4 on AIX (that part
is not old!). Client is an old system, Oracle 7.3.3 on AIX 4.3.3
with Oracle EBU 2.2.0.6. ADSM baclient and API is 3.1.20.6 and
ADSM Connect Agent for Oracle is 2.1.0.6 (fileset ADSM Connect agent
for AIX is 2.1.0.7). This
Licensing question:
We are considering implementing a SAN. Lan free backups are enabled on
a SAN using the storage agent, which could be any of several vendors
SANs. What then is the purpose of these licenses?:
Number of TDP for ESS in use: 0
Number of TDP for E
>The performance of LTO-drives differs a lot in my LTO-environment. Goes from
>8MB/s upto 30MB/s, but I think that's the result of a poorly setup of the
>SAN and the fact that I have windows-clients. ...
As posted in the past, see
"IBM LTO Ultrium Performance Considerations"
ftp://ftp.
Hello folks,
Any one here who had done migration to TSM from other backup software
products like StorageTek REEL Librarian, Legato NetWorker, CA BrightStor,
etc. I am currently using STK REEL Products and looking for a best
compatible replacement for this. Any help in this regard would be highly
Hola
That should do the trick, I think.
If the line to the drives is not the bottleneck anymore, the system and/or
drives will become.
The performance of LTO-drives differs a lot in my LTO-environment. Goes from
8MB/s upto 30MB/s, but I think that's the result of a poorly setup of the
SAN and the
Hi All
Ok, I'm sure this has been covered many times, but it looks like in order
to make use of IBM 3590H drives, I'm going to need to upgrade my TSM
4.2.2.12 Solaris server to 5.1.
So, does anyone have a pointer to a good break down of the steps required
to do this on a Solaris system (has anyon
>Being aware of this, I should think that your AIX admins would respond
>by
>performing network throughput tests to see if their AIX upgrade needs
>network parameter adjustments, as in Receive Buffers, if not Routing.
>I would suggest running some benchmark tests in the AIX host where the
>TSM serv
>Thanks for the information. This API manual could you elaborate more(DB2,
>TSM). I looked in redbooks TSM manual and searched on ggogle but did not
>ever find anything on Reason code 13.
In our ADSM-L postings, all of our references are relative to the TSM subject
area unless otherwise qualified
Just got this from my TSM z/OS server - Version 5, Release 1, Level 6.4
8/15/2003 7:50:47 AM ANRD DSRTRV(1004): ThreadId Missing overflow
range row.
Any clues ?
Hello
Thanks for the information. This API manual could you elaborate more(DB2,
TSM). I looked in redbooks TSM manual and searched on ggogle but did not
ever find anything on Reason code 13.
Mike
-Original Message-
From: Richard Sims [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, August 14, 200
Hello!
Yes, I am using LAN-Free backups via SAN, but I have one HBA (Fiber
Channel Adapter - 100 MB/sec) for accessing drives and other 4 FCAs for accessing
disks (SHARK). We have two switches (directors) ED-500 and 2 switches MC-Data
ES-1000.
I think we have
The AIX sysadmin did it though SMIT. He had to disable the network card to do it. I
think its in SMITT TCPIP.
Guillaume
Jacques Butcher <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>@VM.MARIST.EDU> on 2003-08-15 02:01:45
Veuillez répondre à "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Envoyé par : "ADSM: Dist S
Jacques,
The AIX command to change the Receive Pool Buffer size is:
chdev -l ent"x" -a rxbuf_pool_size=2048
where "x" is replace by the appropriate adapter number. However, it is not
as easy as just issuing this command. The adapter must be "offline" in order
for the change to take effect. This
Hi Guillaume,
What command did you use to change the size of the "Receive
Pool Buffer Size"?
On Thu, 14 Aug 2003 12:44:09 -0400
David E Ehresman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> If other people who are experiencing the problem also
> have receive pool
> buffer errors and increasing the size of the b
>We run a TSM server v 5.1 level 5.4 on an AIX 4.3 machine. The AIX
>admins here have been upgrading their other servers to AIX v 5.1 with
>the 32 bit kerenl. We've found that on the AIX upgraded machines that
>TSM restores and HSM recalls from tape are performing horribly, with a
>transfer rate of
Hi,
we had that problem too, an analasys of the memory dump showed that the
ibmtape.sys driver was responsible, but only after a certain drive was
was used, we disabled that drive and await replacing, since than the server
hasn't bluescreened.
The PMR we opened is in a pending state till we replace
Hello all,
I have two SQL Servers both running Windows 2000, and using TDP for SQL
(version 5.1.5). Let's call the servers Server A and Server B. I have
backed up the Northwind database (just using Northwind as an example) on
Server A and need to restore it on Server B. I have copied the dsm.o
I was at session number 65532 when it started. so that is over the 64000
limit. (i guess the limit is 65536) But after that it doesn't store
anything at all (i did a select * from summary)
but i believe that you are right, that this is the bug/limit that hit me
thnx
Teja, Balbir wrote:
Sorry, m
Hi,
When I issue a "show libr" I can see an autochanger list. Does that mean I can
configure multiple paths to my library?
How do I do that? I have enabled an additional control path on my library so under AIX
I have /dev/smc0 and /dev/smc1.
I can access both of them, but how do I tell TSM to us
There's an IP bug in AIX 5.1 which has this symptom. Latest RML should have the fix.
Search the archives, as it has been discussed before. I'd do it myself, but I our
http proxy is down again.
Steve
Steve Harris
AIX and TSM Admin
Queensland Health, Brisbane Australia
>>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] 15/
>I am recieving this error when the DBA tries to backup. I can do dsmc from
>the commnad line and connect to the TSM server. Any ideas?
>
>db2pet1 @ fr5n09: /home/db2pet1
> > db2 "backup database DVATDMRT use adsm"
>SQL2062N An error occurred while accessing media
>"/home/db2pet1/sqllib/adsm/libad
32 matches
Mail list logo
