These very popular redbooks have been substantially updated and expanded.
Available now in draft format, look for the finalized versions in a month
or two
http://publib-b.boulder.ibm.com/Redbooks.nsf/9445fa5b416f6e32852569ae006bb65f/0b2061426f53984685256cf70078a709?OpenDocument
and
http://publib-b.
Gretchen,
How's your audit situation working out? I've got a similar
problem. Here's a sampling of the messages I get:
ANRD dfbackup.c(2044): ThreadId<79> Error 145 getting
volume name for volId 9
ANRD dsalloc.c(1979): ThreadId<57> Error 1 opening bit
vector DSKV09 for voli
We have an AIX server, so I dont know if the syntax is different, but we do
have AIX clients. we run similar commands but dont use any quotes and dont
include the "-c", an entry for us is like this:
su - oracle /home/oracle/scripts/backup/db_backup.sh
It usually runs fine. however, there are isol
The best method is to do different types of DB backups to tape and disk.
For example, do DB snapshot to tape and do DB full to disk. That way if
you want to just delete the DB backups on disk you can do type=DBFULL in
your del volhist command, this won't affect the tape (type=DBS) backups.
__
The two enterprise distributions are prohibitively expensive unless I know they
are going to work for sure. I just paid $600US for SuSE ES7 yesterday and I'm
hoping that it works. The problem with RH72 is the 2.4.9-31 kernel. It is
disfunctional with our hardware (IBM x235) configuration.
What
If you are a higher-ed TSM site (College, University, Technical, etc), I
would appreciate hearing your answers to the following questions:
Please reply to me, not to the list. I will summarize the results to the list.
1. Approximately how many TSM client systems do you have?
2. How much data is
thanks. if the devclass is file then i guess i can not use the devclass option. If
this is the case how would i delete this DBbackup that was done to file dev class? I
dont want to delete the regular tape dbbackup just the dbbackup on the file dev class.
I read the "h delete volhist" many time
Dale,
Please contact your Tivoli Account Rep and tell them everything you are
feeling.
If more people do this, then hopefully the development folk will get the
message, understand the pain and provide more frequent updated supported
kernels.
BTW, I think the longer term strategy will be RHAS - w
Hello all,
I have a question about one of the requirements for TDP for Oracle 5.2:
According to the documentation, TDP for Oracle 5.2 requires TSM server 5.1
or later. We are in the process of planning to upgrade our TSM server from
4.2 to 5.1 but we are not there yet.
Can we install/test TDP fo
Hello, all!
TSM Server: 5.1.6.4 on AIX 4.3.3.10
TSM Client: 5.1.5.2 on HPUX B11.00
I have the following in the dsm.opt:
servernameTSM01
memoryefficientbackup yes
domain /var/opt/oracle/ata/tkcs1
domain /var/opt/oracle/ata/arch
domain /var/opt/oracle/ata/tkcs2
domain /var/opt/oracle/ata/syste
"ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on 06/05/2003
12:21:25 PM:
> i am trying to delete a db backup that resides in a File devclass.
> I am running this command
>
> delete volhist type=dbbackup todate=today devclass=dbbkup_g
>
> the dbbackups are couple of days old so they are not t
So how are people using (planning to use) large
disk pools (either random or FILE - with or
without Sanergy)?
Migration's one process per node seems to limit
the usefulness of the large disk pool to
implement disk to disk backup.
A large disk pool appears useful for:
1) Large number of nodes
All,
We are to do LAN free to disk and tape now. Has anybody has or knows of a working
setup of:
1. SANERGY MDC on AIX 5.1/AIX 4.3.3
2. SANERGY Client on AIX 4.3.3
3. SANERGY Client on Solaris 8/9
4. ESS
5. TSM 515 for AIX 3.3.3
6. Managed Systems for SAN Storage Agent on Solaris 8
>We have also been looking at using a large diskpool.
>It appears migration only uses one tape drive per node.
>So, if you use TDP to back up 500GB to disk and then
>run migration, it will only use one tape drive to
>migrate that 500GB.
>
>Is this true?
Migration has historically run as one proces
ok. I'm about to be scared. I'm having the impression that SANERGY is backup for
test environment not Prod. Does anybody else have this setup on their production.
inotzki
Remco Post <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Thu, 5 Jun 2003 13:06:56 -0700
inotzki wrote:
> All,
>
> We are to do LAN free to
The MIGPR parm on the storage pool controls now many concurrent
migration processes are started for the storage pool. I do not know of
any node level controls.
>>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] 06/06/03 07:23AM >>>
We have also been looking at using a large diskpool.
It appears migration only uses one tape d
We have also been looking at using a large diskpool.
It appears migration only uses one tape drive per node.
So, if you use TDP to back up 500GB to disk and then
run migration, it will only use one tape drive to
migrate that 500GB.
Is this true?
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Check to see if you have Receive Buffer overflow on the tsm server
machine. Use the command
netstat -v | grep "Receive Pool Buffer"
The "No Receive Pool Buffer Errors:" line should be zero. If it is
not, that may be the source of your problem.
David
>>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] 06/06/03 06:36A
Are you using same nodename on all platforms, i.e. connect as nodename A
from NetWare, Linux and Windows?
You should use separare nodes for each platform. After you have connected
from Windows, the node was "upgraded" to work with Unicode-enabled
filespaces. After that "upgrade" you will not be
>I have a problem with one RS6000 Server, some days (nights) the backup
>job goes in failed, about 1 of 4 nights and the logs shows as below.
>Does some of you hav any idea why?
>
>The job is a simple incremental of files.
...
>2003-06-06 03:12:32 ANS1809W Session is lost...
...
>2003-06-06 03:28:1
I have been able to install the 5.1.5 server on Redhat 9 (yesterday, hence
my post about the missing portions of the install).
The part that gets installed seems to work - so far.
-Original Message-
From: Mitch Sako [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, June 05, 2003 12:07 PM
To: [EM
Hi,
We have :
1 TSM server 5.1 on WNT
1 ASDM server 3.1 on Mainframe
We want integrate TSM with TEC (Tivoli Enterprise Console). We have the
ibmtsm.baroc of TSM 5.1, but how we can integrate ADSM with TEC?
Thank you
Janeth
Hi,
We have :
1 TSM server 5.1 on WNT
1 ASDM server 3.1 on Mainframe
We want integrate TSM with TEC (Tivoli Enterprise Console). We have the
ibmtsm.baroc of TSM 5.1, but how we can integrate ADSM with TEC?
Thank you
Janeth
Hi,
I have a problem with one RS6000 Server, some days (nights) the backup job
goes in failed, about 1 of 4 nights and the logs shows as below.
Does some of you hav any idea why?
The job is a simple incremental of files.
Client:
OS AIX Ver 4.3 ML10
TSM Client 5.1.5.15
dsmerror.log
2003-06-06 0
I was doing some AppleScripting with TSM in Mac OS X and realized
that the applications do not all have unique creator codes:
Application Creator code
TSM Scheduler Daemon AnSd
TSM SchedulerAnSc
TSM Backup ANSB
TSM Mac X Scheduler
On Thursday 05 June 2003 19:06, Mitch Sako wrote:
> The current 5.1.6.5 TSM server for Linux is supported on the following
> platforms:
>
> Red Hat 7.2 on ia32 architecture
> Kernel levels: 2.4.9-31 (for uniprocessor systems)
> 2.4.9-31smp (for multiprocessors systems)
>
> Red Hat
Have tried defining it as 'su - userid -c "sh /tsmscript/backup.sh"'. But
still the return code is 1.
David Longo
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
FIRST.ORG> cc:
Sent by: "ADSM:
i am trying to delete a db backup that resides in a File devclass. I am running this
command
delete volhist type=dbbackup todate=today devclass=dbbkup_g
the dbbackups are couple of days old so they are not the latest. also we only do full
db backups
I am getting this message:
ANR6978E
TDP for Hardware is what is required.
--
Joshua S. Bassi
Tivoli Certified Consultant -ADSM/TSM
eServer Systems Expert -pSeries HACMP
IBM Certified - AIX 4/5L, SAN, Shark
Cell (831) 595-3962
-Original Message-
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
inotzki
Se
The current 5.1.6.5 TSM server for Linux is supported on the following
platforms:
Red Hat 7.2 on ia32 architecture
Kernel levels: 2.4.9-31 (for uniprocessor systems)
2.4.9-31smp (for multiprocessors systems)
Red Hat Advanced Server 2.1 on ia32 architecture
Kernel levels: 2.4.9-e.
The reason why we need to backup to disk is because of backup concurrency. Unlike
tape drives that are limited to number of mounts. What are the license requirements of
that setup from ESS to LTO tape. Did you use TDP for Hardware? Did you require any
data mover device?
inotzki
Joshua Bassi
Your questions:
1) Oh. Is 5.2.0 alreade released?
2) I see. Did it work in 5.1.6.4?
3) Thaks for the reply. However I don't understand why there is no
information
on this option _not_ working in 5.1.6.5 :( In corresponding README I mean.
Answers:
1) No. 5.2.0 has not been released. It has been
This setup is at one of my customer accounts. Server free in this case
is going directly to LTO tape. To backup server less to disk, which
doesn't make a whole lot of sense to me, would be to use Tivoli Sanergy.
Typically I have seen LAN-free go to a disk pool, but not using server
less.
--
Jos
All,
Has anybody seen issues with the new TSM 5.1.6.0 client scheduler being
started by the dsmcad process? I installed the scheduler service and
the dsmcad service as always, but this time the dsmcad process isn't
able to start the scheduler. In the error log it says that the schedule
name is e
Thanks a lot Andrew,
congratulations for your reactivity et your job on this mailing list.
--
David Rigaudiere -+- Administration TSM -+-
Paris -+- 40, rue de Courcelles -+- 4e étage -+-
[EMAIL PROTECTED] -+- 01.5621.7802
|-+--->
| | Andrew
Do know how I can be removed from this mailing list ?
-Original Message-
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of
Stapleton, Mark
Sent: 04 June 2003 02:30
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Backup optical storage pool
From: Hong J. Sun [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
On Thu, 5 Jun 2003 16:38:17 +0100
i love tsm <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi All
>
> Our current TSM Server running on AIX 4.3.3 is at version 5.1.5.0.
> Obviously a few levels behind now and am planning to upgrade. Just wanted
> peoples opinions as to what TSM Server levels they have found to be
APAR IC36460 has been opened to address this problem.
Regards,
Andy
Andy Raibeck
IBM Software Group
Tivoli Storage Manager Client Development
Internal Notes e-mail: Andrew Raibeck/Tucson/[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Internet e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (change eye to i to reply)
The only dumb question is th
Hi All
Our current TSM Server running on AIX 4.3.3 is at version 5.1.5.0.
Obviously a few levels behind now and am planning to upgrade. Just wanted
peoples opinions as to what TSM Server levels they have found to be reliable
beyond 5.1.5.0. Should I go straight for 5.1.6.5??
Most clients are at
On Thu, 5 Jun 2003 13:06:56 -0700
inotzki <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> All,
>
> We are to do LAN free to disk and tape now. Has anybody has or knows of
> a working setup of:
>
> 1. SANERGY MDC on AIX 5.1/AIX 4.3.3
My suppier has up to now been unable to deliver the MDC capable AIX needed.
>
That's been my suspicion of how tapes wind up as private without a
stgpool. So I run this periodically (with a tip of the hat to Paul Seay).
select volume_name from libvolumes where
status='Private' and libvolumes.volume_name
not in (select volume_name from volumes) and
libvolumes.volume_name n
>Thanks for the q libr command found out that 400 is my private category.
>When I look in my act log I find no references to these volumes & they do
>not show up in q vol or q libv. Any suggestions about there real status?
>Could they be volumes that were mounted in a drive when TSM went down? Al
Thanks for the q libr command found out that 400 is my private category.
When I look in my act log I find no references to these volumes & they do
not show up in q vol or q libv. Any suggestions about there real status?
Could they be volumes that were mounted in a drive when TSM went down? Also
I
Yes, I this is a bug.
Regards,
Andy
Andy Raibeck
IBM Software Group
Tivoli Storage Manager Client Development
Internal Notes e-mail: Andrew Raibeck/Tucson/[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Internet e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (change eye to i to reply)
The only dumb question is the one that goes unasked.
The com
this description from microsoft could help you further:
http://www.microsoft.com/technet/treeview/default.asp?url=/technet/security/
tips/Recover.asp
Actualy, looks like such restoration is a project per se
and due to diversity of possible sceanrii the restore propcess
is not eligible for practi
You do not indicate your TSM versions, but I am guessing you are at 5.1.
See the "automating tasks" chapter in the client manual for an explanation
of client return codes.
"dsmc incremental c:\docu*\* -subdir=yes" is not a valid syntax, as you
can not partially qualify directory names in this fash
Hello.
I have a problem with TSM server 5.1.6.5 core dumping during heavy load on
AIX 4.3.3
dsmserv.err says:
06/06/2003 03:26:30 ANR7834S Thread 127 (tid 7ff7) terminating on signal 11
(Segmentation violation).
06/06/2003 03:26:30 ANR7834S GPR 0: 0x, 1: 0x7e1f15e0, 2: 0x3025f2a
Hi,
When one uses the 'register node' commmand to create a client node, one
can specify the 'userd=none' paramter to prevent the creation of an
administrative ID that has client owner authority over the new node. I
can find no way to accomplish the same thing when creating a node by
using the 'im
I am having some issues w/ clients. Every client is failing w/ a
"return code 12".
I can't find anything on this. The closest thing I've found is
0012 E
DSM_RC_ABORT_MOUNT_NOT_POSSIBLE
Explanation: Server media mount not possible. The
server timed out waiting for a mount of an offline
49 matches
Mail list logo
