Re: Problem with Storagetek L20 and 5.1.6.2

I upgraded 4.1.6 -> 5.1.5 ->5.1.6.0 ->5.1.6.2 I don't remember the version for the ITSM device driver as I went back but it was the latest available on the tivoli server. But there was something peculiar : when I issued an update all with the 5.1.5 cd, the devices were not updated and I had to spec

What are all parameter needs to estimate Bandwidth

Hi, What are the parameters/Steps needed to Estimate the Bandwidth for connecting to TSM Console Remotely from one location to another. Thanks and Regards, Srini

Re: licensing costs

> Can anyone explain how having more than one processor in a server has anything to do with how much it costs to back it up? Sure, it's how IBM can change more for a product that lives on the higher end of the food chain. They figure that if you spend money on SMP based systems, then you can affo

Re: licensing costs

Gill, Geoffrey L. wrote: I am wondering if there is still a link out there that will allow us to figure out licensing costs. Sure it's changed a half million times and Tivoli has been consolidated into IBM but maybe someone knows where it is. I am assuming it would not be advisable to just bring u

Upgrade to TSM 5.1 yet?

I would like to ask the group a question. Do any of you have thoughts about the "maturity" of the product, as it stands now? My boss is questioning whether we should hold at 4.2. on our four servers, or go ahead and upgrade to the 5.1.x.y available now. My experience has been that it is best to

5.1.6.2 Linux tsmscsi broken

The tsmscsi that is in 5.1.6.2 for Linux32 is not working for us: We are running Redhat 7.2: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]$ uname -a Linux tsm2 2.4.9-31 #1 Tue Feb 11 14:43:37 PST 2003 i686 unknown The 5.1.6.2 tsmscsi executable prints the following strange message: [EMAIL PROTECTED] bin]$ ./tsmscsi packa

Re: licensing costs

>Can anyone explain how having more than one processor in a server has >anything to do with how much it costs to back it up? Indeed. And it may get more complicated as Hyperthreading can make one processor look like two to any software running in the Intel system. Richard Sims, BU "We fou

Re: licensing costs

Coats, Jack wrote: Reciently I heard from my VAR, that TSM NT/2K and Novell clients are all now priced on a per processor basis. Where previously on these the client was for up to 4 processors, and after that you went to a different teir of pricing. Now a single processor client cost more than a

Re: checkin command

I forgot to include my system information: Environment: Server: RS/6000-AIX5.1 TSM V4.2.1.9 Client: NT4-SP6, Win2k-SP1, SP2-AIX5.1 TSM V4.2.1.9 - Original Message - From: "Tommy Templeton" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Mond

Tape Errors - Help me recover unavailable tapes...

I did a 'q vol acc=unavailable' and found 4 tapes in my little 3583 library. Each tape showed errors, 9, 9, 216, and 1 respectively. Then I did a 'q vol acc=destoyed' and found 2 tapes, with 53 and 0 errors reported respectively. These two tapes show that some files are on them. I really have all

Re: licensing costs

I find that even when I ask a 'simple' licensing question if nt VAR (i.e. what is the cost of a NT client license), they are told they must go back to TSM to ensure the configuration for a client license (also delaying any quote I want from 24 to 72 hours ro so). ... So currently, the answer is 'NO

Re: checkin command

We have 3590e tapes and I'm trying to incorporate this command into those server command scripts on the TSM server. I'm trying to put together an offsite backup process. We've been doing our offsite process all wrong and I'm trying to correct it. I guess I need to put another script in to do a dbsn

Help setting up RMAN w/ TDP 2210

Hi all; I'm having all kinds of problems and am hoping someone can assist me with this setup...as I'm all confused at this point. Environment: AIX 51 ML3 TSM Server 5162 TSM (ba) Client 510 (64 bit) TSM (api) Client 4210 (32 bit) TDP (oracle) Client 2210 (32 bit) Oracle Enterprise Server 817 As

Re: checkin command

It looks like you're trying to check in a single volume. In that case, you'll need to specify the devtype parameter in your checkin command. This is what we do to checkin a single tape: checkin libvol 3494A devtype=3590 status=scratch I'm assuming your 3494 has 3590 drives in it. Kason Leung Sys

Re: checkin command

You need DEV=tape or whatever. At 04:01 PM 2/24/2003 -0600, you wrote: Does this command work in a 3494 environment? Does there have to be any conditions to use it. The last time I tried to run it, I didn't have very good success. I could have been doing something wrong. checkin libvol 3494vts &vo

Re: checkin command

I do it every day. I think you need to have the 'devt=3590' option for the 3494. checkin libv libname volname status=scratch devt=3590 checkl=no or checkin libv libname search=yes status=scratch devt=3590 checkl=no bob On Mon, Feb 24, 2003 at 04:01:21PM -0600, Tommy Templeton wrote: > Does th

Re: licensing costs

Since v5.1 licensing is based on processors - no matter are they server or client. Having 10 processor licenses you can have 1 server and 9 clients or 10 servers for the same price. The price for maintaining these 10 servers Zlatko Krastev IT Consultant "Gill, Geoffrey L." <[EMAIL PROTE

checkin command

Does this command work in a 3494 environment? Does there have to be any conditions to use it. The last time I tried to run it, I didn't have very good success. I could have been doing something wrong. checkin libvol 3494vts &vol status=scratch Tommy Templeton Senior System Administrator DFA-MMR

Re: expiration runs, deletion not done

>Henk - Possibly: You could do a Select search on your Backups or Archives > tables for that OBJECT_ID, to identify the filespace object involved, >and perhaps via Contents determine what tape volume it is on, then do an >Audit Volume Fix=Yes ? Richard, I know which filespace is involved (i.

Re: TSM and LTO again...

I get this occaisonally, It has always worked fine the second time. -Doug -Original Message- From: Humberto Gómez López [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, February 24, 2003 2:53 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: TSM and LTO again... Someone could help with this? thanks 02/24/2

TDP Domino sporadic/chronic error - "ACD0200E File () could not be opened for reading."

We have a TDP-Domino incremental backup schedule on our TSM Server that occasionally produces this message in the client log: > Tivoli Data Protection for Lotus Domino - Version 1, Release 1, Level 1.0 . . > Backing up database mail\WXY12345.nsf, 1

licensing costs

I am wondering if there is still a link out there that will allow us to figure out licensing costs. Sure it's changed a half million times and Tivoli has been consolidated into IBM but maybe someone knows where it is. I am assuming it would not be advisable to just bring up another server without a

Re: TSM and LTO again...

There seems to be h/w problem.Check if ur drive is online ? I feel ur drive is offline. Thanks Balanand -Original Message- From: Humberto Gómez López [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, February 24, 2003 1:53 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: TSM and LTO again... Someone could h

Re: TSM and LTO again...

First I would make sure that slot-256 was empty by doing an AUDIT LIBRARY. Could be there's a tape in there that TSM doesn't know about. Bill Boyer -Original Message- From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Humberto Gsmez Lspez Sent: Monday, February 24, 2003 2:5

Re: TSM and LTO again...

Someone could help with this? thanks 02/24/2003 15:24:34 ANR0609I LABEL LIBVOLUME started as process 2. 02/24/2003 15:24:34 ANR0405I Session 43 ended for administrator ADMIN (WebBrowser). 02/24/2003 15:24:35 ANR8323I 001: Insert LTO volume A0B000 R/W into entry/exit

Fwd: SCHEDLOG question

Hello, I have 2 sched logs below to show you from a Archive I created a while back. This was an additional backup to a RMAN for ORACLE/UNIX. They have taken for ever to run . These are on Unix machines with a Oracle Data Base that we run a PRE and Pos command to bring down the Db. >From here , we

Re: TSM - TEC Integration

Look at section "Logging Events to the Tivoli/Enterprise Console" in TSM 5.1 Administrator's Guide. Zlatko Krastev IT Consultant Dan Carlo Freitas Peres <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent by: "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 17.02.2003 11:16 Please respond to "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager"

Re: expiration runs, deletion not done

>Since a couple of days expirations runs, but deletion stops after an error: > >02/21/03 14:44:10 ANRD imutil.c(5570): ThreadId<100> Bitfile id > 0.496165168 not found. Henk - Possibly: You could do a Select search on your Backups or Archives tables for

Re: Performence question on Network and switch w.r.t NFS AIX.

Thanks a million. I will find out. Balanand -Original Message- From: Chris Murphy [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, February 24, 2003 11:58 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Performence question on Network and switch w.r.t NFS AIX. >Now my question is: >1.Is it sufficient just

Re: ODBC driver for Microsoft : the driver was unable to allocate memory required to support execution

Hello Arnaud, I am the developer who works on the ODBC driver, and I am unfamiliar with this particular problem. Can you please open up a problem with support on this, as it may require an APAR? You can give the support people my name, tell them I said this should go to Level 2, and that they can

Re: Performence question on Network and switch w.r.t NFS AIX.

>Now my question is: >1.Is it sufficient just to change mtu size on switch or we need to do some tuneing further on switch. >Thanks >Balanand Pinni Balanand, Which Supervisor engine does this Cisco 4000 switch have? Sup II does NOT support jumbo frames at all. Sup III does support them after

Storage Management (Quotas)

For those of you who also are responsible for Storage Management in addition to Backup-Restore, Does your organization set user quotas on network storage? What size limits do you set? How long do you allow a file to sit on a system before it is migrated, archived or deleted?

expiration runs, deletion not done

AIX 4.3.3, TSM 4.2.3.3. Since a couple of days expirations runs, but deletion stops after an error: 02/21/03 14:44:10 ANRD imutil.c(5570): ThreadId<100> Bitfile id 0.496165168 not found. 02/21/03 14:44:11 (100) Generating Database Transaction T

Converting I/O station into regular slots

Hello TSMr's I have a question, I am running out of physical space on my 3583 library, and I was wondering if there is a way of making the 12 slots on the I/O station (Bulk), part of the regular tape slots. Any help will be appreciated. Thanks, Camilo Marrugo -- Camilo A. Marrugo Data Storage Ma

Re: TSM server crashing

It looks like your server is running out of memory. Some of the threads are crashing, and message reading threads can't get started, therefore you are seeing the Message number errors. I had simular problems with this on AIX, when we were doing server to server communications. Restores from

TSM server crashing

Hello guys, Can you help me please with following problem? I have TSM server v.4.1.1 on Win NT 4.0 SP6i (I know it is quite old) Recently (about two weeks ago) my server started to crash. Here is output from my activity log: 02/23/2003 18:32:26 ANR0987I Process 5 for EXPIRATION running in the BA

ODBC driver for Microsoft : the driver was unable to allocate memory required to support execution

Hi list, I would like to use the ODBC driver delivered with TSM Windows client, in conjunction with an Access 2002 database, but when I try to issue following query : SELECT SUMMARY.START_TIME, SUMMARY.END_TIME, SUMMARY.ACTIVITY, SUMMARY.ENTITY, SUMMARY.BYTES, [end_time]-[start_time] AS duratio

Re: ACSLS Access ID - labeling tapes

Hi, I checked up ACSLS manual and quick ref guide which I use and I did not find any command on labeling tapes.I get labeled tapes! Thanks Balanand Pinni -Original Message- From: Murphy, Craig [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Sunday, February 23, 2003 10:22 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subjec

Performence question on Network and switch w.r.t NFS AIX.

Hi all, I have db volumes on Netapp filer and it is mounted as NFS from AIX point of view.Recently I migrated db volumes to this mount point on 100mbps /sec on its NAS interface. But later migrated to 1GB Network interface ,i.e netapp interface which is also on 1GB interface connected to AIX p se

Re: ACSLS Access ID - labeling tapes

Murphy, Craig wrote: Hello I'm trying to label a tape using dsmlabel but with the ACSLS now having volume access control I can't access any tapes in the library. dsmlabel -drive=/dev/rmt/2mt,0,0,9,3 -library=acsls,0 -keep Comes back with "ANR9759E unsuccessful ACSAPI response, status=STATUS_VOLU

Re: Need ideas for offsite copy of HSM tapes

At 12:08 PM +0200 2/23/03, Zlatko Krastev/ACIT wrote: - HSM client sends the data in a storage pool. That storage pool can be backed up to a copypool. If this is a storage hierarchy within the server (diskpool migration to tapepool), backup the diskpool first then backup the tapepool to same copypo

Re: FW: TDP SQL Restore Error

Thanks for your help Del. We have tested with 4 stripes and we restored at around 28-31MB/sec previously from tape (3590E XL). I'll call IBM. Thanks again. Rizwan Rizwan Shamim Central Backup Service (CBS) Merrill Lynch Europe PLC Tel: 020 7

Re: FW: TDP SQL Restore Error

Rizwan, This means that some of the data objects needed for the restore cannot be found in the TSM Server database. If the restore worked prior to the migration to tape, the backup must have been good. And so, something must have happened that caused some of those objects to be deleted or corrupte

Re: FW: TDP SQL Restore Error

Thanks Del. Problem with MAXMUMMP. Fixed now. However I now get the following: 24-02-2003 13:23:50 ACO5456W The backup is corrupt and is not fully restorable. 24-02-2003 13:23:50 Processing will continue. 24-02-2003 13:23:50 ACO0302E A failure occured on stripe number (3), rc = 428 24-02-2003

Incremental DB backup slow

Hello, I just watched a incremental db backup running. My db is 81 GB in size of which about 70 GB are used. The log is set to rollforward mode and about 7,5 GB in size. At the moment the backup started the log usage was 85% with 37 MB data in the db changed. From the start of the process until the

Re: Wanted : Link to TSM 4.2 peformance and tuning guide

http://www-3.ibm.com/software/tivoli/library/technicalbriefs/ ftp://ftp.software.ibm.com/software/tivoli/technical-brief/tsm-tuning.pdf Regards, Jiri Jiri Polata Tivoli Consultant AG COM, a.s., namesti Miru 22, 503 03 Smirice tel.: +420 495 421 312 fax.:??? +420 495 421 108 e-mail: [EMAIL P

AW: Wanted : Link to TSM 4.2 peformance and tuning guide

Hi Arnaud, I found it at ftp://ftp.software.ibm.com/software/tivoli/technical-brief/tsm-tuning.pdf starting at page http://www-3.ibm.com/software/tivoli/library/technicalbriefs/ Hope this helps Thomas -Ursprüngliche Nachricht- Von: PAC Brion Arnaud [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Gesendet: M

Wrong action field in dsmsched.log

Hi all, I noted next messages in dsmsched.log on W2K BA client: 24-02-2003 10:38:43 --- SCHEDULEREC QUERY BEGIN 24-02-2003 10:38:43 --- SCHEDULEREC QUERY END 24-02-2003 10:38:43 Next operation scheduled: 24-02-2003 10:38:43 24-02-2003 10

Wanted : Link to TSM 4.2 peformance and tuning guide

Hi List, I saw a (broken) link to this guide in a previous post, then tried to find this masterpiece on the new IBM-Tivoli website, without luck :-( Was somebody better than me in that hunt ? Thanks in advance ! Arnaud =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= | Arnaud Brion, Pan

Re: Restoring RMAN data onto different server

There is a clone functionality in RMAN I think it would be quite easy to get RMAN to restore a database on a different system. the trivky bit is getting TDP to act like the other node I guess you would need to change the dsm.sys node name and rerun the password program. Then it's restore database.

Antwort: Re: My experience with audit db

Hi, our server run for 4 years without auditdb or unload/load db. We have some inconsistency object in our db's. The support can't fix this problem with any of unsupported commands. That the reason to do a "auditdb" regards Michael Garnebode Diplom-Informatiker Schmitz Rz Consult GmbH Bachstr.1 5

Any Idea about this error message : Error 267 incrementing logica l occupancy for volume?

Hello, I am running TSM Server 5.1.6.1, TSM Clients 4.2.1.32 and TDP Exchange 2.2. For some clients, including Exchange TDP, I am getting the following error messages : TDP Exchange 02/22/03 23:21:50 ANRD asvolut.c(1825): ThreadId<44> Invalid parameters - storage pool Id 4, volume Id 1715. 0