I'd heard that 5.1.5 vanilla release was flawed (big surprise!?!) Maybe you
can try the first PTF (5.1.5.1), or patch level, for your situation...
Version 5 Release 1, Level 5.2 PTF
IP22546_02
(this one just released... 10/17)
There's been a long history indicati
Geoff,
Yep... there have been several other reports about 5.1.5.1 -- looks like the
oven was still not hot enough for this one... it's still not quite fully
cooked. We knew base 5.1.5.0 was flawed from IBM bulletins; didn't know
the full extent of the issue, though.
Last I checked, 5.1.1.6 was
Hi
Sorry for this old question but I forgot how to redirect a command to a file
on Novell client.
I tried: show opt (clib_opt)/>sys:/tmp/file.txt
Without any success, show the output still on the screen
Regards Robert Ouzen
E-Mail:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
After upgrading to 5.1.5.1 on AIX 4.3.3 I've been having a ton of misses and
failed reports, not to mention some as In-Progress that are not and
completed. Has anyone else seen this phenomenon on their system? Last night
I had 15 failed 25 missed and 6 still show In-Progress.
On the ones reporting
I share Mark's sentiments... on TWO points:
- if this was resolved, for both users in the discussion, let's share the
results;
- if DIRMC is no longer relevant, I'd sure like to know why! Win2K is
becoming ever more prevalent, and most data center customers go wild with
lots of permission groups (
Do not recommend non-raid ESS disks for TSM that you will mirror. The ESS
defines very large disk groups at a time as RAID-5 or RAID-0 and with the
ESS-800 you can use RAID-1 (actually I think it is RAID-10).
The log is a sequential write only workload for all intensive purposes. In
the case of
Andrew Raibeck wrote:
Responded to offline.
Andy Raibeck
IBM Software Group
Tivoli Storage Manager Client Development
Internal Notes e-mail: Andrew Raibeck/Tucson/IBM@IBMUS
Internet e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (change eye to i to reply)
The only dumb question is the one that goes unasked.
The com
At 11:48 PM -0500 10/25/02, Mark Stapleton wrote:
That's exactly what will happen. If you set the reusedelay for 1 day, it
will mean that it will be 24 hours before those tapes can be checked in a
scratch tapes--loads of time to make sure that the right tapes are
retrieved.
But that's exactly w
The Network transfer rate is always whacked out when using client
compression.
We get all kinds of extraordinary rates, one of the highest last night was
139,504.82 KB/sec (all on 100 Mb/sec link).
Tim Rushforth
City of Winnipeg
-Original Message-
From: Seay, Paul [mailto:seay_pd@;NAPTHE
Hi ,
I thank all for your suggestions.I removed the mirrors of db and log.There
is a great improvement in the performance.I am recommending the customer to
have non RAID disks for db and log.Then i mirror the db and log.
Regards
Raghu.
"Seay, Paul"
On Fri, Oct 25, 2002 at 11:17:16AM -0400, Matt Simpson wrote:
> scratch. All is OK if human retrieves all the right tapes. But if
> one doesn't get retrieved for some reason, there is no longer any
> record that the tape exists and isn't where it belongs. I'd like to
What I do, is create an ad
Fantastic... this is excellent resolution -- the old screen is still there,
just gotta know its new address!
Thanks,
Don
Don France
Technical Architect -- Tivoli Certified Consultant
Tivoli Storage Manager, WinNT/2K, AIX/Unix, OS/390
San Jose, Ca
(408) 257-3037
mailto:don_france@;att.net
Profess
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:ADSM-L@;VM.MARIST.EDU]On Behalf Of
Seay, Paul
> You do not have to login. Just select the ADSM-L archives in
> that left bar
> area. It will take you to the search engine area.
>
> I have found that Netscape 4.76 does not work with this site.
Mozilla 1.0.1 w
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:ADSM-L@;VM.MARIST.EDU]On Behalf Of
Prabhat Ghosh
> The information contained in this message may be CONFIDENTIAL and
> is for the intended addressee only. Any unauthorized use,
> dissemination of the information, or copying of this message is
> prohibited. If
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:ADSM-L@;VM.MARIST.EDU]On Behalf Of
Matt Simpson
> >Tape volumes in the storage pool will now go to PENDING status
> >when they are
> >moved to ONSITERETRIEVE status. You won't be able to check them in as
> >scratch tapes until the reusedelay period of time expi
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:ADSM-L@;VM.MARIST.EDU]On Behalf Of
Prather, Wanda
> AFAIK, you can always check in a tape as PRIVATE, regardless of vault
> status.
>
> I think it makes sense, but I haven't tried to do that.
Yeah, that's the ticket!
Check 'em in as private tapes, and when yo
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:ADSM-L@;VM.MARIST.EDU]On Behalf Of
Laura Buckley
> I know that it's bad form for me to tout my own product, but STORServer
> Manager (the TSM operational interface) may help you to solve this
> problem. It is a GUI to your tapes at the vault, in the library, i
Halleluiah!!! I have ALL these same complaints, too; I hope our friend in
Virginia sees and responds to this! It's a great service he does, but it
needs to be made usable, again.,,, nice experiment, now let's fix it,
please?!?
Don France
Technical Architect -- Tivoli Certified Consultant
Tivol
18 matches
Mail list logo
