A 16:44 21/02/02 -0600, vous avez écrit :
>Is anyone out there running a 3.1 tsm client of HPUX 10.20 with a 4.1 TSM
>Server? If so, any issues I need to be aware of? I know IBM does not
>support it, but we have a handful of HPUX clients that cannot go to 11.x,
>and therefore cannot go higher th
Hi
We are currently on version 3.1.2.50 adsm server code and 3.1.20.7
client code.
We do not have support from IBM as ADSM V3 has been discontinued.
The processes that where running was a Level 0 backup of Informix using
the
API client code. The ADSM database backup a Full Backup was running at
t
Have you tested any restores?
-Original Message-
From: S W Branch [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, February 21, 2002 5:11 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Running HPUX 10.20 3.1 clients
Yes, I'm running ADSM 3.1.6 backup clients on approximately 25-30 HPUX
10.20 systems.
I will be out of the office starting February 22, 2002 and will not return
until December 31, 2002.
I no longer work for IBM. If you wish to contact me for personal reasons
my mobile number is 07951 879336. Alternatively try my email at
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Since you're mostly Intel based, why not a Win2K solution? I know of a very
large site that backs up over 600 GB per night from well over 100 systems to
a Dell Quad Xeon, SAN storage, STK Powderhorn with 9840 drives (10 total).
Their database is over 100 GB. I don't think you have to rule out th
If you loaded down 4.2.1.10 prior to February 5th at 10:00am it will show as
4.2.1.9. According to support it really is 4.2.1.10 otherwise.
Paul D. Seay, Jr.
Technical Specialist
Naptheon, INC
757-688-8180
Latest level of Oracle DBserver is oracle 9i. Which is already supported by
TDP on some platforms.
11i is just oracle apps release.
Regards
Aman Singh
- Original Message -
From: "Kelly Lipp" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, January 28, 2002 11:11 PM
Subject: TDP an
Yes, that should be sufficient. That eliminates that point.
David Longo
>>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] 02/21/02 08:05PM >>>
Guys
Any updates ??
-Original Message-
From: Jane Bamberger [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, February 22, 2002 6:38 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Expira
Why a 'RISC based server system' Mark? You could handle that number of
clients easily with a low end Windows server.
Mark
-Original Message-
From: Mark Morrison [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, February 21, 2002 2:27 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RISC SERVER SPECIFICATIONS
Guys
Any updates ??
-Original Message-
From: Jane Bamberger [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, February 22, 2002 6:38 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Expiration processing
Hi,
I have SELFTUNEBUFpoolsize Yes.. shouldn't that be sufficient? - but I do
see that my Cache hit p
People shred paper documents all of the time. They want to dispose of them
and don't want them to get into the wrong hands. Whether a person considers
the wrong hands a competitor, a hacker, or the FBI, the reason for shredding
is the same. Why should an electronic document be any different?
I
It's not an official pronouncement, but the Using IBM LTO Ultrium with Open
Systems redbook SG24-6502 has this statement on page 24:
Restriction: At this time, sharing a HBA with Disk and Tape is NOT
recommended. In many instances, the microcode or device drivers HBAs
required to support the diffe
I don't have history with the product; I know folks who use the commonstore
for SAP with good results. CommonStore for Exchange was released late last
year. There was a paper that touted the product for handling mailbox
restores at the Oxford TSM Conference.
_
I think Tivoli is waiting until Veritas buys everything, then they will buy
the last one. Saves on all that acquisition cost.
-Original Message-
From: Brown, Bud [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, February 21, 2002 1:49 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Legato to Buy OTG in $
Numbers of servers means very little.
What kind of network attachment infrastructure. What do the clients have?
How much data on the clients?
What is the backup windows?
How any copy pools for offsite and onsite recovery?
-Original Message-
From: PINNI, BALANAND (SBCSI) [mailto:[EMAIL P
Yes, I'm running ADSM 3.1.6 backup clients on approximately 25-30 HPUX
10.20 systems. The TSM server is running TSM 4.1.5 server software on an
AIX 4.3.3 maint level 9 system. One of the clients also uses the SQL
Backtrack for Oracle. I have not seen any problems and have been running at
this lev
IBM does not support same disk and tape across the same HBA on Windows.
Basically, for optimal performance the disk and tape need different values
for a couple of items and they are not testing both disk and tape on the
same HBA.
Here is the reality. I have been running disk and tape on the same
Is anyone out there running a 3.1 tsm client of HPUX 10.20 with a 4.1 TSM
Server? If so, any issues I need to be aware of? I know IBM does not
support it, but we have a handful of HPUX clients that cannot go to 11.x,
and therefore cannot go higher than 3.1 on the TSM client. Any comments
will b
Joshua,
I've heard this before, but I couldn't find anyone at IBM to confirm it.
SO.
I've been running tape and dasd thru the same FC adapter for about a year
now. Traffic goes from rs6k to an IBM2109 (brocade) switch and then splits
from there. I suspect the switch is handling the arb
Hello, Folks!
We happened to have the TSM Server down during a time when a certain client
would have been polled for a backup that was to take place 12 hours later.
Our polling intervals are 4 hours apart. TSM last polled this clients 4
hours previously, and did not resume any polling of this clie
Alex, I cannot agree more strongly. As an IT professional, it has been
the whole end of my exertions to prevent exactly this. I like working
with WDSF/ADSM/TSM because it makes it very hard to lose data.
If you don't want it restored, don't back it up, or perhaps the activity
that those files doc
Tim, did you attach a aleabanr.gif and leavesBkgrd.jpg on purpose. Because this is
the second time someone has sent these apparently useless attachments to me. Possible
virus???
>>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] 02/21 3:56 PM >>>
the events table
TABSCHEMA: ADSM
TABNAME: EVENTS
CREATE
> We have the need to be able to completely delete (shred) a document. Once
> shredded, it can't be restored. I need to be able to remove it from all the
> tape pools, disk pools, off site tapes, off site databases, archive tapes
> etc.
>
> Is this possible? If I delete the document from the da
Hi Brian,
You are not right. That value is just tells the
system the number of days before the tapes can be
reused. Your former administrator may have done that
because he was running out of scratch tapes. I have
found myself doing that whenever I faced the problem
of not having scratch tapes.
> There is a brick-level restore TDP for Exchange out within the next
> month(s).
***
*** This is not true.
***
> But Tivoli's advice is not to use the brick level restore
functionality...
> Haven't heard why yet..
***
*** See previous appends on the subject.
***
> IBM CommonStore for Exchan
the
events table
TABSCHEMA:
ADSM TABNAME: EVENTS
CREATE_TIME: 1996-04-25 14:31:19.025065
COLCOUNT: 8INDEX_COLCOUNT: 1 UNIQUE_INDEX:
FALSE REMARKS: Scheduled Event
Results
-Original Message-From: Jane Bamberger
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Thursday, Fe
I would recommend only if u tell what is the cost to performance u are
looking for?
-Original Message-
From: Mark Morrison [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, February 21, 2002 1:27 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RISC SERVER SPECIFICATIONS
I have been given a couple of days
Yes, if you want to keep the DB volumes for 7 days, then the resusedelay
should be 7 days also. If you are using DRM then it will take care of the
db volumes, therefore you don't need the delete volhist for type=dbb.
(If the delete volhist runs before expiration, then the db volume can get "lost"
-Mark-
>I would also like to know advantages and disadvantages for the different
flavors of Unix and vendors?
See the Redbook "Getting Started with Tivoli Storage Manager: Implementation
Guide" Table 13 for some helpful information.
http://www.redbooks.ibm.com/pubs/pdfs/redbooks/sg245416.pdf
T
> Is there a way for me to restore a individual Mailbox, by NOT restoring
the
> whole Information Store.
> and not backup PST files using TSM Backup Client.
Petur,
No.
Del
TDP for Exchange (and Microsoft for that matter) does not support brick
level backups/restores of the Information Store.
Mark
-Original Message-
From: Pétur Eyþórsson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, February 21, 2002 2:47 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Exchange TDP 2.2 Re
Unfortunately not, Microsoft doesn't support this functionality in their
product.
--
Joshua S. Bassi
Sr. Solutions Architect @ rs-unix.com
IBM Certified - AIX/HACMP, SAN, Shark
Tivoli Certified Consultant- ADSM/TSM
Cell (415) 215-0326
-Original Message-
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [m
Unfortunelty not, Microsoft does't support this functionality in their
product.
--
Joshua S. Bassi
Sr. Solutions Architect @ rs-unix.com
IBM Certified - AIX/HACMP, SAN, Shark
Tivoli Certified Consultant- ADSM/TSM
Cell (415) 215-0326
-Original Message-
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mai
Send the the dump to IBM Support they should be able to figure it out.
Kvedja/Regards
Petur Eythorsson
Taeknimadur/Technician
IBM Certified Specialist - AIX
Tivoli Storage Manager Certified Professional
Microsoft Certified System Engineer
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Nyherji Hf Simi TEL: +3
Hi
Is there a way for me to restore a individual Mailbox, by NOT restoring the
whole Information Store.
and not backup PST files using TSM Backup Client.
Kvedja/Regards
Petur Eythorsson
Taeknimadur/Technician
IBM Certified Specialist - AIX
Tivoli Storage Manager Certified Professional
Microsoft
6
>>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] 02/21 2:37 PM >>>
How many drives do you have in the 9490?
>>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] 02/21/02 02:27PM >>>
I have been given a couple of days to come up with specifications for a RISC based
server system to run TSM for a 100 + node network. The clients are NT/Win2K and
Net
Hi,
I have SELFTUNEBUFpoolsize Yes.. shouldn't that be sufficient? - but I do
see that my Cache hit percent is low..
Cache Hit Pct.: 97.15
Cache Wait Pct.: 0.00
Does anyone have any suggestions on how much to increase the size of the
pool.
These are my c
How many drives do you have in the 9490?
>>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] 02/21/02 02:27PM >>>
I have been given a couple of days to come up with specifications for a RISC based
server system to run TSM for a 100 + node network. The clients are NT/Win2K and
NetWare. The system must talk to the StorageTe
I have been given a couple of days to come up with specifications for a RISC based
server system to run TSM for a 100 + node network. The clients are NT/Win2K and
NetWare. The system must talk to the StorageTek 9490 - Powder Horn. I figured that
among all the TSMers out there that have worki
My question: When will Cheyenne buy St. Bernards OFM?
Bud Brown
Information Services
Systems Administrator
303-436-5986
-Original Message-
From: Joshua S. Bassi [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, February 21, 2002 11:00 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Legato to Buy OTG in $4
There goes another product that integrates with TSM...
Thu Feb 21,12:44 PM ET
MOUNTAIN VIEW, Calif. (Reuters) - Software company Legato Systems Inc.
on Thursday said it would buy OTG Software Inc. for $403 million in a
cash-and-stock deal that expands its data management offerings.
The news se
I actually was working on the daily monitoring script as I write - and was
working on all the parsing, etc and could see it was a daunting task!!!
Thanks you so much!!
Jane
Jane Bamberger
IS Department
Bassett Healthcare
607-547-4784
-Original Message-
Fro
Hi !
Q LIC is only updated after running AUDIT LIC
Your nodes DB data and storagepool space will be released after running an
EXPIRATION and RECLAMATION. But that has nothing to do with the result of Q
LIC
Regards,
Jesper Matthiesen
WISEhouse Denmark A/S
IBM Business Partner
www.wisehouse.com
-Brian-
You are on the right track! And also if you guys are using DRM (your copy
stgpools),
then make sure DRMDBBACKUPEXPIREDAYS is set to the same value as well. This
is to ensure
that the db can be restored to an earlier level and db references to files
are still
valid in your stgpools.
Comma
>From the info you provided, your primary stgpool, the diskpool on Compaq
disk cabinet, and the migrationpool defined on the 3584-L32 are sharing the
same FC card. If thishis is the case, it is a bad design. You may use two FC
card on the P610. One for the Compaq FC disk cabinet and the other for
Hello *sm-ers,
I'm the new TSM-administration in our organisation and I have a question
about how the last adminstrator set up the option 'Delay Period for Volume
Reuse'.
In our environment we have a diskpool. Every day we migrate the
back-up/archive data to a tapepool. We also have some administ
This type of error is normally a problem to raise with TSM support.
There are quite a few hits for anr7834s
It would help the list if you indicated what TSM processes were active at the
time of the crash.
Your TSM level and the server operating system would also be good.
"Ramnarayan, Sean A
Also make sure you've got either EXPQUIET specified in your server options
file, or specify QUIET=YES on the expire command.
David Longo
cc:
Sent by: "ADSM: Dist Subject: Re: Expiration processing
For the current level of supported platforms follow the link below, this
should answer questions 1 & 3. The short of it is, "yes", we support HP
and Solaris. TDP for Oracle does not yet support Oracle on Linux, this is
in plan though.
http://www.tivoli.com/products/index/data_protect_oracle/index
One simple step that definitely improves expiration processing speed is
having enough BUFPOOLSIZE. do a q db f=d and see what the "cache
Hit Pct" is. Ideally is 98 % or better. If much lower, even 90% then expire
will take longer. Also "Cache Wait Pct" should always be zero.
David Longo
>>>
Hi
There is a brick-level restore TDP for Exchange out within the next
month(s).
But Tivoli's advice is not to use the brick level restore functionality...
Haven't heard why yet..
IBM CommonStore for Exchange is a good product for using HSM together with
Exchange(also exists for Domino). Howeve
Hi
According to the message, you are using EN_US as language environment in
your TSM. Is this language environment also installed in you operating
system? Probably not, and this is why you don't get a "real" error message.
Best Regards
Daniel Sparrman
---
Daniel
I keep 7 days in the actlog - the event log
must have the data - as you can do a query past one day using begind and
begint.
Does anyone know the tables used in the q
events command?
Jane
Jane Bamberger
IS Department
Bassett Healthcare
607-547-4784
-Or
Hi Gurus,
I noticed a strange behavior of our server, while trying to delete a
node. Problem looks like : the node is deleted, but when looking in the
activity log, I have the following message :
02/21/02 14:40:21 ANR2061I Node PACNT150 removed from policy domain NT.
02/21/02 14:40:21 << Message
Hi
The below error caused the adsm/tsm application to crash.
Has anyone seen this error before and please could you explain what
caused the error :
1020221-114111: ANR7834S Thread 52 (tid 3436) terminating on signal 11
(Segment
ation violation).
1020221-114111: ANR7834S GPR 0: 0x309ab364, 1
Hi Arnaud!
Message 2289 is probably: ANR2289I Administrative userid admininstrator name
defined for authority over node node name has not been removed.
You could check that and try running a audit lic afterwards.
Kindest regards,
Eric van Loon
KLM Royal Dutch Airlines
-Original Message-
Hi,
I think you might be running into the same problem we are - our expire
command never stops - but we do not see any more expired after about 1
hour.. it examines millions of files - but only expires about 20 or 30
thousand. IBM is lookining into the problem, and we have provided traces,
and tr
Bill,
Can you elaborate on IBM Content Manager CommonStore for Exchange? I was
told to do some research on this product. I have visited
http://www-3.ibm.com/software/data/commonstore/exchange/ and am in contact
with an IBM sales rep, but I wanted to get some feedback from someone who
has experien
Hello TSMers,
Server: TSM Server AIX 4.3.3
TSM 3.7.2
Client: Windows NT 4
TSM 4.1.3
I have a reoccurring entry in some dsmerror.log files for Windows NT 4
clients. These clients back up night and then receive this message for 3
hours after their backup each night.
02/21/2002
Thanks Andy,
I've tried in the meantime turning on client compression but this didn't
solve my problem with this particular file. I've also tried to compress the
file using WINZP (vers. 6.3) but there is the 4GB file size limit too.
Can you tell me at which point in proccessing the file the decis
Hello tsm users,
I have a Problem to get an access per WEB to two different Nodes on one
Server.
To start backups or restores we often use the tsm web client.
We installed on one server two different nodes (one normal and one
pst-Node).
To get access on this server we use the IE 5.5 and type
htt
We run expiration daily for a couple of hours, and we realized
> that we were
> not getting enough scratch tapes back. We decided to run expiration
> indefinitely until all objects that need to be expired are removed.
> Expiration is been running for a week with 9 millions objects
> expired. Is t
Hi TSMers
Running TSM 3.7.3.8 on Solaris 2.7 attached to two 3590 drives housed in a
3494 automated library.
This is not something I am having to do at the moment, but something that I
want to get clear in case the need arrises. Let's assume the database is
corrupt and I cannot sign on to the TS
63 matches
Mail list logo
