Hallo Tomáš,
you could use storage standard storage pool hierarchy,
backing first to disk storage pool,
which later migrates to primary tape pool
(you probably already do this).
If your disk storage pool is large enough not to be migrated for, say,
couple of days,
than you can schedule
backup
Morgan,
I am afraid you were a bit upset when writing
your mail. Stating that Arcserve is capable of 100+ MB/sec
seems either not to be fair, or you must have very
sophisticated hardware.
In order to give you any advice more informations are needed.
If you happen , for example, to use 10MBit net
Since the 3494 has already read the barcodes in order to place the tape in the insert
category, you could try checkl=no with no impact.
Steve Harris
AIX and ADSM Admin
Queensland Health, Brisbane Australia
>>> "Ilja G. Coolen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 03/05/2001 16:39:25 >>>
Hi all,
Almost everyone
Hi all,
I want to ensure:
1. Do I need two mountpoints (at minimum two drives) if I want to backup
primary tape storage pool to copy storage pool?
2. Is any other way to resolve making backups to copy storage pools with
only single tape drive?
Thanx Tom
Tomáš Hrouda, AGCOM Smiřice
Tivoli Certif
John - seems like this error has occurred before when not using the latest
client level (eg the base code of the install CD rather than the latest fix
level). If you're on V4, try
ftp://service.software.ibm.com/storage/tivoli-storage-management/maintenance/client/v4r1/Windows/i386,
or on 3.7
ftp:
I am installing IP22151_12_ODBC_Driver.exe install on Windows 2000
Professional. I must be missing something. I've tried and tried and just
can't seem to make it work. When trying to configure the Windows 2000 ODBC
Data Source Administrator using the System DSN tab, I consistently get "The
setup r
The organizing committee for the Oxford University TSM Symposium 2001 is
inviting vendors with TSM related hardware and software products to display
their products in our vendor demo area and possibly provide presentations on
their products.
We are specifically looking for companies who provide v
>We want to use both FC ports of the 3590 drives (connected via a FC
>fabric)in parallel for automatic path fail over. Is this supported by AIX
>and how could this be implemented in AIX. At the moment I see for the same
>drive two definitions in AIX. They are both available but they doesn't
work
>
Jim,
The group:
http://www.tivoli.com/support/storage_mgr/pubs/admanual.htm#optional
Specifically TDP for Exchange 2.2:
http://www.tivoli.com/support/storage_mgr/pubs/v4pubs/v1_pdf/msexc/ab5exmst.pdf
Thanks,
Del
Del Hoobler
IBM Corp
select volume_name from contents where file_name like (???%)
file_name is the client's name for the file
you possible could replace file_name with filespace_name since the oracle db probably
would be in it's own file space
>>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] 05/03/01 11:45pm >>>
I am looking for a select st
Hi
tony
I have AIX servers and tuning helped me in dsmserv.opt file and AIX tuning.I
have 40 unix/40nt clients.
In arcserv does it manange with data base to recover to particular date and
time
during restore.
balanand pinni
-Original Message-
From: MORGAN TONY [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Hi all,
I'll do 3 replies in this mail:
___ REPLY 1 ___
>Why don't you use the library autoclean functionality, it's simpler and
>moreover it won't use one slot in your 9740 as the cleaning slot is not
>visible for TSM ?
>rv
I was using autoclean but I disabled it because:
*) With auto
Hi All
Below again a posting from a few weeks ago - with the microcode - infos.
With this Microcode i needed 67 minutes to restore 17 GB...
LTO Microcode - Perf Improvement
From: arhoads <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Mon, 12 Mar 2001 06:10:46 -0800
I'm posting this to the A
People,
We are in the process of implementing TSM using a SAN and shared libraries.
TSM will be running on two SUN 4500s using EMC DASD, IBM SDGs, LTO libraries.
We want to use Tivoli Software Distribution to put client code on about 500-800
clients.
We have NT, W2K, and Solaris clients.
1) Are
Quoting Jeff Connor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> I've been trying to download the latest Windows client from the
> service.boulder.ibm.com FTP server all day but can get the .EXE to
> download
> all the way. I can download the README's but the .EXE file download
> stops
> at 22,168KB and hangs there e
Be aware
If you are running WIN2000, TSM only keeps one version of the registry.
They indicated that this was not a problem, but I define ADSM to keep
between 3 and 7 copies of each file. Try not to learn this the hard way.
If you are running prior to 3.7 on server or client the WIN2000 registr
The APAR actually applies to all TSM server platforms. For the MVS server
a ZAP
is available. Although the problem is in common code, the symptom does not
occur on the Windows platform. The MVS and the Solaris servers will hang.
The
AIX server will crash. I am not sure what the HP server will
I've been trying to download the latest Windows client from the
service.boulder.ibm.com FTP server all day but can get the .EXE to download
all the way. I can download the README's but the .EXE file download stops
at 22,168KB and hangs there every time. Anyone else had this happen?
Thanks
Jeff
Hi Tony,
did you used the same crabby network with arcserv ? or you were backing
up to local drives ?
Seems like there is network issue in yr environment... have u tried to
ftp from the TSM server to any TSM client ? how is the performance there
... rubbish ? probably...
It is not a TSM issue fri
> Hi All,
>
> I run the NT TSM 4.1.x.x at client (43 clients) and Server and performance
> is rubbish...
>
> Arcserve was 100 times faster!!! (Min.)
>
> I have applied all the tuning covered in the Tivoli Adv.Mgmt course... and
> can't get much past 1MB/sec
so you were getting at least 100MB/
tsm overall performance is quite the order of network speed
i've been given the following data (to be verified)
- 1,4 GB/hour on a 10 Mb/sec net
- 14 on a 100
- 140 on a 1 Gb
some clues :
- check your network (by doing remote file copy or ftp transfer)
- check your clients backup logs : they will
Del,
Is this documentation available on-line?
BTW, we're expecting a CD early next week w/2.2
Del Hoobler wrote:
> Mark,
>
> Are you using the "/EXCSERVER=virtual-server-name" option?
> In a cluster setup, it MUST be specified.
> (See page 35 in the GUI chapter and page 66 of the command-line
you should use arcserve
-Original Message-
From: MORGAN TONY [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, May 03, 2001 12:40 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: NT Performance issues
Hi All,
I run the NT TSM 4.1.x.x at client (43 clients) and Server and performance
is rubbish...
Arcserve
Performance that bad suggests (shooting in the dark here) that your NIC
might be set to autonegotiate rather than 100mbps.
You might try to ftp a file from your TSM server to its client (i.e., take
TSM out of the picture) and see what kind of numbers you get.
I don't think it's a crappy product.
Big Brother tells me that Alex Paschal wrote:
> Hi, Jack. There's a FAQ at Richard Sims's site,
>
> http://people.bu.edu/rbs/ADSM.funcdir
>
> There's a searchable archive at
>
> http://www.adsm.org
>
Thanks. I knew of the searchable archive, but it wouldn't help
much: a search for DIS
Saud - if your server is os/390 then this apar is your problem.
Item PQ48420
APAR Identifier .. PQ48420 Last Changed..01/05/02
HANG ACQUIRE MUTEX ISSUING RECREATE BITVECTORS IC29878
Symptom .. WS WAIT Status ... OPEN
Severity ... 1
Hi All,
I run the NT TSM 4.1.x.x at client (43 clients) and Server and performance
is rubbish...
Arcserve was 100 times faster!!! (Min.)
I have applied all the tuning covered in the Tivoli Adv.Mgmt course... and
can't get much past 1MB/sec
So that I can justify (or not) retaining Tivoli...
Hi, Jack. There's a FAQ at Richard Sims's site,
http://people.bu.edu/rbs/ADSM.funcdir
There's a searchable archive at
http://www.adsm.org
Alex
-Original Message-
From: Jack McKinney [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, May 02, 2001 3:28 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: DISK r
Malcolm,
2 things to check
a: check your maxsession in dsmserv.opt or the equiv. on the sun box
b: NT sessions sometimes hang...q sess and cancel sess # to remove
sorry its a quicky, but i'm going home...Now!
-Original Message-
From: Gibb, Malcolm [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 0
Yes!
George Lesho
Storage/System Admin
AFC Enterprises
Gisbert Schneider <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on 05/03/2001 08:59:55 AM
Please respond to "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
cc:(bcc: George Lesho/Partners/AFC)
Fax to:
Subject: 3575lib
Hello,
can any
Sorry,all, about the accidental commercial postings about Servergraph. I
clicked reply, and oh,well. Honest mistake.
-
Mr. Lindsay Morris
Principal
Applied System Design
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Office: 859-253-8000
Fax: 425-988-8478
John,
I am experiencing similar problems here. My backup performance is
fantastic, but my restore performance is poor. All my variables (server,
client, code levels, LTO, etc...) are similar to yours, except we're on
Gigabit Ethernet. I've even tried eliminating the LTO's from the picture by
r
Hi, Stephen.
Did you ever get a chance to look at Servergraph/TSM?
I'd be very interested in your take on what TDS has that Servergraph lacks.
The slideshow only takes 10-15 minutes, if you just want the 5,000-foot
view.
I know TDS is free with 4.1, but you still have to buy the supporting
pack
Hi, Steve.
Did you ever get a chance to look at Servergraph/TSM, after I sent you the
press release the other day?
The slideshow only takes 10-15 minutes, if you just want the 5,000-foot
view.
Hope to hear from you. Thanks.
-Original Message-
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:[EMA
Hi, Paul.
Did you ever get a chance to look at Servergraph/TSM, after I sent you the
press reelease last week?
The slideshow only takes 10-15 minutes, if you just want the 5,000-foot
view.
Hope to hear from you. Thanks.
-
Mr. Lindsay Morris
Principal
Applied S
You maybe don't have pre-labelled tapes; try using "label libv 3570lib
search=y labels=b checkin=scr". You'll need to ensure there is a drive
available, etc. (Do "help label libv" for more info.)
-Original Message-
From: Gisbert Schneider [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday,
If that doesn't work, try same command with overwrite=yes. I have found that even a
new tape can have "something" on it and not label correctly - overwrite=yes labels no
matter what was on tape. Be careful about this as you can overwrite existing data
tapes.
David B. Longo
System Administrato
Hello John,
I have worked with one customer getting the same
behaviour on restore, even with the 0C1 microcode
applied. Small bursts of files being restored at a time.
We have captured TSM and Atape traces and found
TSM to be waiting for LOCATE commands to complete.
We found this to be an LTO mi
Can anyone help me.
We have an IBM 3583 Library with 6 drives, 72 slots, and two controllers.
What is the optimal configuration for connecting the drives and the
controllers. e currently have three drives daisy chained and connected to
a controller but are experiencing I/O related errors. Are t
Yep, that will cause the error you saw.
You can restore old data with a newer client.
But you usually can't restore data backed up with a higher level client
using lower level code.
-Original Message-
From: Steven P Roder [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, May 03, 2001 8:46 AM
To:
Are you sure the tape is labeled? Try:
label libvol 3575LIB search=bulk checkin=scr labels=barcode overwrite=no
>
> So i think the library should be ready for the C-Format XL tapes. But here is
> what i get when trying to checkin such a tape:
>
> 05/03/01 14:07:31 ANR2017I Administrator A05
I would hope/expect to see at least 10 GB/Hr restore speed, especially if
there was no need to mount a lot of tapes; have you opened PMR with IBM
and/or Tivoli on this problem?!? Also, are you seeing 20 GB/Hr on backup
speed?
We just ordered a six drive 3583, along with H80, specifically intend
According to Chibois, Herve:
> Hi all
>
> I'm trying to backup one of my linux box, MDK 7.1, linux-2.2.19
> FS are under ReiserFS, and it seems that TSM is annoyed with it ?
>
> Any idea ?
Add for each domain a virtualmountpoint statement in
the option-file dsm.sys
virtualmountpoint /
vi
Hi, Curtis.
Did you ever get a chance to look at Servergraph/TSM?
I'd be very interested in your take on what SAMS has that Servergraph lacks.
The slideshow only takes 10-15 minutes, if you just want the 5,000-foot
view.
Hope to hear from you. Thanks.
-Original Message-
From: ADSM: Dis
No, I don't know that. Can I get more info somewhere.
-Original Message-
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of
France, Don G (Pace)
Sent: Thursday, May 03, 2001 11:27 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Can I send one file to two pools?
But you all do kn
Hello,
checking our library i get the following results:
lscfg -vl smc0
DEVICELOCATION DESCRIPTION
smc0 20-60-00-0,1 IBM Magstar MP 3575 Library Medium
Changer
ManufacturerIBM
Machi
But you all do know that it's coming, right?!? Future plans include added
replication (e.g., similar to what BackInt already allows SAP dba to do, but
in a LAN-free way for copies beyond the first).
-Original Message-
From: Lindsay Morris [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, Ma
Hi all
I'm trying to backup one of my linux box, MDK 7.1, linux-2.2.19
FS are under ReiserFS, and it seems that TSM is annoyed with it ?
Any idea ?
# mount
/dev/hda5 on / type reiserfs (rw,notail)
none on /proc type proc (rw)
none on /dev/pts type devpts (rw,mode=0620)
/dev/hda8 on /home type r
Hello all,
DRM here is set up the following:
DB Backup Series Expiration Days: 7 Day(s)
Recovery Plan File Expiration Days: 7 Day(s)
Last week I implemented dbsnapshots, one per day, and an incremental, one
per day, on top of the regular dbbackup. The dbbackup and incrementals
remain in the libra
Not all C1A will support XL tapes. They need at least 41A of the
microcode too.
> Try "lscfg -vl rmtn", where n is replace by an appropriate numeric value. A
> drive capable of supporting the desired tape should return (along with the
> other information):
>
> Machine Type and Model.
The library needs 2.19 of the EPROM. The drives need at least 41A. I am
running 432 without problems.
> We are using the 3575 L32 library and use the C format XL tapes...
>
> K. Jones
> Chesterfield County VA
> >>> Gisbert Schneider <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 05/03/01 09:59AM >>>
> Hello,
>
> can anyo
Try "lscfg -vl rmtn", where n is replace by an appropriate numeric value. A
drive capable of supporting the desired tape should return (along with the
other information):
Machine Type and Model..03570C1A
If it returns
Machine Type and Model..03570B12
the drive does not
I am looking for a select statement to identify tape volumes used during an
oracle db backup
for a specific date (04/20/01). Can anyone help me?
Thanks
William M. Jolley
EDS
9014 Research Drive
Charlotte, NC 28226
Tel:704-548-5524
pag:877-471-5029
email:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Create the copy storage pool from your disk storage pool before you migrate
to tape.
Jeff Bach
Home Office Open Systems Engineering
Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.
WAL-MART CONFIDENTIAL
-Original Message-
From: Alex Paschal [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, May
We are using the 3575 L32 library and use the C format XL tapes...
K. Jones
Chesterfield County VA
>>> Gisbert Schneider <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 05/03/01 09:59AM >>>
Hello,
can anyone tell me how to check whether my 3575 library tapedrives can
use Magstar C-Format XL tapes?
__
Greetings,
I have seen many posts on adsm.org about LTO, but none that
addresses the problem I am seeing. Backup speed seems to be fine, at
least as far as I can tell. But when I do a restore, I see a strange
behavior. The restore seems to happen in bursts, where the restore
pulls back file
Mark,
Are you using the "/EXCSERVER=virtual-server-name" option?
In a cluster setup, it MUST be specified.
(See page 35 in the GUI chapter and page 66 of the command-line chapter.)
Thanks,
Del
Del Hoobler
IBM Corporation
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hello,
can anyone tell me how to check whether my 3575 library tapedrives can
use Magstar C-Format XL tapes?
__
Da E-Mails leicht unter fremdem Namen erstellt oder manipuliert werden
koennen, muessen wir zu Ihrem und u
> Hi Steve!
> What's the client code level? It's probably rather outdated! Upgrade to the
> most current level, this will solve your problem.
> Kindest regards,
> Eric van Loon
> KLM Royal Dutch Airlines
Actually, I think the issue is that the client is running 3.7.2, but the
person that was doin
BTW, make sure you get the latest microcode on those drives. We just went thru a
series of catridges becoming unavailable and having to do volume restores and losing
data in the process.
>>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] 05/03/01 06:38AM >>>
As far as i know AIX doesn't support automatic failover for tape
Hi Steve!
What's the client code level? It's probably rather outdated! Upgrade to the
most current level, this will solve your problem.
Kindest regards,
Eric van Loon
KLM Royal Dutch Airlines
-Original Message-
From: Steven P Roder [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, May 02, 2001
I am having major problems attempting to install the ADSM agent for Lotus Notes.
Has anybody out there got 1) A successful implementation and 2) Proper
documentation on how to install the agent?
I am running a TSM 3.7.2.18 client on NT4 SP6a with Lotus Notes 4.6 and ADSM
Lotus Notes agent versio
On 2 May 2001, at 22:53, Mark Stapleton wrote:
>Where does the trade off happen for your system? There
>are so many
>variables that it is almost mandatory to do some
>benchmarking to find
>the breakpoint.
Questions like this are extremely complex. Every single piece in the
system must be looked a
Worry not... tsm will fill the "holes"
Are you only using disks ?
Won't you be bleeding the diskpools off to some tapepool nightly ?
Dwight
-Original Message-
From: Jack McKinney [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, May 02, 2001 3:28 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: DISK reclam
As far as i know AIX doesn't support automatic failover for tape devices by
default. For this to accomplish you need to build it yourself, or install
third party software.
As an example: we have connected an ESS to our S70 - ADSM Server using 4 FC
adapters. AIX correctly detects each harddisk 4 t
Good morning, hope you've got your thinkin' caps on,
Got this error message in the ACTLOG when starting the client GUI on NT4.0,
the server is on Sun Solaris, TSM version 4.1.3
05/03/01 09:04:31 ANRD tcpcomm.c(1567): SessionThread: return code
from
setsockopt is 22
For all you AIX guru's out there,
I need an additional information on the definition of 3590 FC tape drives to
AIX.
We want to use both FC ports of the 3590 drives (connected via a FC
fabric)in parallel for automatic path fail over. Is this supported by AIX
and how could this be implemented in A
Good morning, hope you've got your thinkin' caps on,
Got this error message in the ACTLOG when starting the client GUI on NT4.0,
the server is on Sun Solaris, TSM version 4.1.3
05/03/01 09:04:31 ANRD tcpcomm.c(1567): SessionThread: return code
from
setsockopt is 22
Hi Thomas,
Just use the old 3.1 client for irix versions under 6.5
ftp://index.storsys.ibm.com/adsm/fixes/v3r1/sgi/
rv
> -Message d'origine-
> De : Hrouda Tomáš [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Envoyé : jeudi 3 mai 2001 07:53
> A : [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Objet : TSM client on Silicon IRIX
>
Will XSF be supported for the Linux client? Any availability dates?
Hanna Hahne
Hanna Hahne email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
ZDV (R0100) Tel.: 06221 42 2357
Deutsches Krebsforschungszentrum Fax:06221 42 2399
Im Neuenheimer Feld 280
hallo jack,
no need to worry about reclamation of disk storage pools at all.
(Primary) disk storage pools will be emptied according to
their migration limits as set by you.
Maybe you should read TSM documentation, there is a nice
chapter about its concepts in one of the books (sorry, I forgot
wh
71 matches
Mail list logo
