A 12:09 22/01/2001 -0500, vous avez écrit :
>Space Manager apparently is only suported for AIX and Solaris. Tivoli Web
site also indicates that OTG's DiskXtender 2000 will make it work on NTFS
filesystems.
>
>Anybody using Space Mgr for NT 4.0 and does anybody know if such a product
is availble f
A 20:09 22/01/2001 -0500, vous avez écrit :
>Many thanks to James & Richard for your input. You got me thinking of
>the problem from another angle and here's what I came up with
...
>To my surprise, the backups straight to DLT were insignificantly
>slower than our backups to disk -- even duri
>For doing on-line backup and restore of Lotus Domino R5
>servers you MUST have an R5 "compliant" product. That is,
>you must have a product that uses the backup/restore
>APIs provided by Lotus. TDP for Lotus Domino is R5 compliant.
ok, i have the latest release of domino (v5.0.4 or so) and the
Hello Richard,
I am running in 64 bits mode and installed the appropriate packages !
Frederic.
> -Original Message-
> From: Richard Sims [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Monday, January 22, 2001 4:04 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: Solaris client v4.1.2.0 problem
>
> >
The only things I can tell you are:
- every time a Domino Database get's opened, it get's a new date and so the
normal TSM Backup Client thinks it
got changed and backs it up. We have a problem with this at the moment,
because we need nearly 18 hours to backup
our Notes-environment. so we are
I completed a backupset for one of our Novell servers. The "problem" is
that there is a large disparity in number of objects that were incorporated
into the backupset versus total number of files that reside on the Netware
volumes (a lot less). We do not have many exclusions setup on this
serv
Is it possible to set the restore priority in such a way that it will
preempt the other process consuming the tape drives?
Kelly J. Lipp
Storage Solutions Specialists, Inc.
PO Box 51313
Colorado Springs CO 80949-1313
(719) 531-5926
Fax: (240) 539-7175
Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] or [EMAIL PROTECTED]
If you really have lots of disk to work with, you would configure disk pools
to hold one night's worth of backup load (check dsmaccnt.log for actuals,
size the disk pool at 125% or more), then trigger migration when backups are
finished. Then, only send the big globs straight to tape; send all t
The "Getting Started" RedBook is the very best starting point; also, SHARE
has excellent sessions, usually with usable hand-outs, so there's much info
out there, and for a (very modest?) small fee... there are folks who would
visit for awhile and make pointed recommendations, some even in writing
Was anything else using the tape drives? If you have 2 drives, and are
running space reclaimation, your restore won't start until the reclamiation
ends. Same thing with migrations tying up the tape drives. This is why I
always recomend an odd number of tape drives, and only allowing one fewer
m
Many thanks to James & Richard for your input. You got me thinking of
the problem from another angle and here's what I came up with
I created a new policy domain for each Domino server, and defined a
new nodename for each as well. These new policy domains are set to
write straight to the DL
I have a customer that mentioned that in older versions of ADSM that the
retrieval of archived data did not retain file ownerships or file
permissions. He would be curious to know if this has been included in
newer versions. Does anyone know how to respond to this one? Offhand or do I
need to go
Is anyone using the TSM to backup AS/400 nodes? If so, can you give me
some direction in obtaining, installing and configuring the TSM AS/400
Client API.
Thanks in advance!
Peter Kostrobala
Manager, ADC Infrastructure
Cap Gemini Ersnt & Young - Los Angeles ADC
714/436-4271 - Pager 888/827-4560
Way back here ... http://msgs.adsm.org/cgi-bin/get/adsm0004/402.html I
offered an HTML based ADSM Monitor, built using unix scripts and a touch of
PERL (CGI).
Quite a few people were interested, although I haven't heard how any of them
got on.
Anyway, for those who are interested, I have fixed a
Eric,
It looks like you already now the real problem. Your hardware is not
sufficient for your business need. You may be able to kludge something to
work, but you really should look into getting additional hardware. You
could even setup a dedicated TSM server for just your TDP for Domino
infor
I researched this some six months ago and was unable to find any feasible product for
Netware.
David Longo wrote:
> Space Manager apparently is only suported for AIX and Solaris. Tivoli Web site also
>indicates that OTG's DiskXtender 2000 will make it work on NTFS filesystems.
>
> Anybody usi
Hello all,
I'm relatively new to TSM, and inherited a 3.7 server on AIX with one
3570 library (19 tapes). We do oracle backups and Solaris/Linux/Aix/NT
backups to the same storage pool.
The problem is we're backing up up a lot of data. Occasionally TSM will
use up all the tapes, leaving no scr
>22-01-2001 14:49:50 ANR0406I Session 267 started for node ClientA (WinNT)
>22-01-2001 15:49:55 ANR8337I DLT volume BACKUP01 mounted in drive MT3.0.0.7
> (MT3.0.0.7).
>
>This is a continuation of the probs I have been having with restores.
>If you notice it has taken an h
I think I saw that a while back. It maybe that startup can't find some config files.
Most likely you are not starting in the "bin" directory of don't have *SM environment
vars set correctly and it tries to get input from command line.
If you are removing something, maybe somthing got deleted
Hello All
Is anybody familiar with this generic message. I have a Solaris Server backing up
clients in a DMZ zone. When I try starting the TSM server it stop while tring to
build the recover logs. I am in the process of removing a patch from solaris that may
have caused this mess. Anyway h
Thierry,
For doing on-line backup and restore of Lotus Domino R5
servers you MUST have an R5 "compliant" product. That is,
you must have a product that uses the backup/restore
APIs provided by Lotus. TDP for Lotus Domino is R5 compliant.
If you take "online" backups without using an R5 complian
Help please
I just recently upgraded our TSM 4.1 Windows 2000 server to TSM 4.1.2.0.
However I encountered a few misfortunes. The file I used to upgrade was
IP1 (TSM4120_Server.exe)
After running the installer I noticed that the TSM Server had lost it's
licenses. I looked in the server dir
Many Thanks Ken...
I have downloaded it and intend to read it over the next day or so.
Best Regards
Tony
-Original Message-
From: Ken Sedlacek [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 22 January 2001 17:05
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Tivoli 4.1 Best Practices
I have found the redbook
Space Manager apparently is only suported for AIX and Solaris. Tivoli Web site also
indicates that OTG's DiskXtender 2000 will make it work on NTFS filesystems.
Anybody using Space Mgr for NT 4.0 and does anybody know if such a product is availble
for a Netware 5.0 Client?
David B. Longo
Sy
hi,
So far that's the only way you can delete them. We are working on a tool
which will help you delete these orphaned oracle backups.
regards,
Thiha
>How do you recommend cleaning up the problem?
>Is using the (unsupported) DELETE OBJECT command the only way?
I have found the redbook entitled: "Getting Started with Tivoli Storage
Manager: Implementation Guide", SG24-5416-01) to be good if one. This
redbook takes you through an TSM implementation from ground zero.
Asking questions in this forum does give you a considerable better "real
world" goings-on
As long as I was on V3R1, I would see the system hang if anyone did a "q fi
or q node" while expiration was running. The only solution was to restart
the server. I wouldn't be surprised if something similar is at work in
your case.
At 04:54 PM 1/22/2001 +0100, you wrote:
>I've run into a probl
22-01-2001 14:49:50 ANR0406I Session 267 started for node ClientA (WinNT)
22-01-2001 15:49:55 ANR8337I DLT volume BACKUP01 mounted in drive MT3.0.0.7
(MT3.0.0.7).
This is a continuation of the probs I have been having with restores.
If you notice it has taken an hr
I believe all the problems you are describing can be taken care of by
applying the latest service updates. In the past when I would encounter
these problems the only solution was to stop and restart the server. If you
are nervous about that just make sure you have a good db backup before you
exp
hello
i'm gonna move my adsm 3.1 server to a brand new tivoli 4.1 (on aix) and
add tivoli data protection for lotus domino on an nt box
i'd appreciate any feedback concerning _actual_ advantages of backing
domino with tdp instead of just doing a file-level backup, in terms of
speed and volume. w
Gunnar wrote, in part..
> Which client version is best for a Win2000-server ?
I'm optimistic it will be the next one. ;-)
(Both the latest 3.7 and 4.1 Win clients have 2k support).
cheers, wayne
Wayne T. Smith [EMAIL PROTECTED]
ADSM Technical Coordinator - UNET U
I've run into a problem and I would be very obliged if someone has an idea what
I could do about it:
ADSM Server for AIX-RS/6000 - Version 3, Release 1, Level 2.20
seems to be in a strange state and nomore doing what its expected to do.
dsmadmc shows the following informations:
adsm> q log
Av
Tony, unfortunately, I have never been able to find one, and when I ask my
IBM/Tivoli consultants, they tell me no too. Unfortunately also, when asking
for "expert" opinions on how to do things, each IBM/Tivoli "expert" will give
you his/her own answer-- there is no IBM way, like there is a "Micr
>I am running Solaris 8 (October 2000 edition) with the TSM v4.1.2.0
>backup/archive client downloaded from the IBM ftp site. I try to gain
>access to our TSM v4.1.2.0 server (RS/6000) via TCP/IP. Unfortunately the GUI
>generates a core dump most of the time. Has anyone experienced such a problem
I have the same setup except the clients are running solaris 7 and
I do not have this problem. What I have experienced is the client
being unable to restore archived files to their original location.
They must be retrieved to a different location. Support has been
notified and their
Hello,
I am running Solaris 8 (October 2000 edition) with the TSM v4.1.2.0
backup/archive client downloaded from the IBM ftp site. I try to gain access
to our TSM v4.1.2.0 server (RS/6000) via TCP/IP. Unfortunately the GUI
generates a core dump most of the time. Has anyone experienced such a
prob
Rename the filespacename where ?
Mike
> -Original Message-
> From: Jelle Komrij [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: á éðåàø 22 2001 15:44
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: Novell Issues
>
> Marc,
>
> There seems to be an upgrade problem to long file name space with the
> 3.7.x
Hello,
As a new Tivoli convert (ex-Arcserve), I need to gain TSM 4.1 knowledge
rapidly.
Does anyone know of a paper, or similar, that describes TSM Best Working
Practises that usually come from years of experience, or more often painful
mistakes. (Have you written one?) The Technical Guide is
Marc,
There seems to be an upgrade problem to long file name space with the 3.7.x servers
and up.
Work around: Rename the old filespacename.
Marc David wrote:
> Ever since I've upgraded from ADSM 3.1.07 for Novell. I'm now running the
> latest client TSM 4.1.2.
>
> I have volume that were c
Hello all,
I did a timing test of a DSMSERV UNLOADDB/LOADFORMAT/LOADDB with our 50GB
database on a separate system. This test system was an older, single CPU,
500MB RS/6000 and the dump was to a file on disk (approx 22GB).
What I'm surprised about is that when we ran the process on the real sys
People
I am trying to do a restore of a large array with limited success.
A. I try to do the restore from another node and type in
res -subdir=yes -repl=no -nod={"clientA\d$"}\* client B (specified as drive
letter on the local machine).
all I get is a msg saying 'waiting for files from server'.
We're continuing to see people write in about various
problems, saying that they're on TSM server level 3.7.0.
3.7.0 was the first incarnation of the Tivoli Storage Manager,
and as you can expect, had lots of warts. If you are having
problems, you should upgrade your maintenance level within the
Greetings,
Forgive me if I'm missing the obvious but...this weekend we converted a
Novell 5.1 box from the ADSM 3.1.0.6 client to TSM 4.1.1_18. We also set
up new disk and tape pools for this guy in order to set up some
collocation. Anticipating that virtually every file would be touched
anyway b
Hello !
I have seen some time ago that some of You had opinions about some
client-versions on a Win2000-server.
I think it had to do with backing up the registry or some other part of
the "System Objects" and that it didn't function ok.
This far I have only used ADSM 3.1.x on backing up Win2000-
Hello,
I'm using Exabyte 480 and AIX 4.3.2 with TSM 3.7.0
I have problems with this hardware.
Library is starting neverending selftests, like after reset.
In activity log there are messages like 'sCSI device failure' or 'drive or media
failure'.
but all diagnostic tests on aix are ok.
in errorlog
45 matches
Mail list logo
