4.1.2 Client has been released for most platforms.
Keith Davey
You should contact IBM/Tivoli Support. A Level 2 tech can assist you in
removing the values from the DB
Keith Davey
On Fri, 15 Dec 2000, Joshua S. Bassi wrote:
> All,
>
> I have a customer with a disk storage pool volume that
> won't delete. It is a raw logical volume and somehow
> it was re
Thanks all.
At 03:27 PM 12/15/2000 -0800, Jim Smith wrote:
>The rumor is true. Taken from the TSM 4.1.2 client readme file:
>
> - The SYSTEMOBJECTS domain has been added for Windows 2000 System
>Objects.
> This domain is included in domain ALL-LOCAL
Jim,
Do you know when the 4.1.2 client is scheduled for release? I was just
getting ready to start installing 4.1.1.0 on our
servers but will wait if 4.1.2 will be out soon.
Thanks,
Jeff Connor
Niagara Mohawk Power
Jim Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>@VM.MARIST.EDU> on 12/15/2000 06:27:49 PM
Pl
The rumor is true. Taken from the TSM 4.1.2 client readme file:
- The SYSTEMOBJECTS domain has been added for Windows 2000 System
Objects.
This domain is included in domain ALL-LOCAL and will allow users to
backup the Windows 2000 System Objects as part of a scheduled backup.
All S
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, "Joshua S. Bassi"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> says:
>
>All,
>
>I have a customer with a disk storage pool volume that
>won't delete. It is a raw logical volume and somehow
>it was removed from the system, so it needs to be
>purged out of the ADSM database.
>
>del vol /dev/
We continued to use the library from the previous version until we ordered
the TDP product. I can't remember if we had to use xbsa.o or bsashr10.o or
both. We use AIX, so there may be some differences. Since we were not
confortable relying on backups done with an unsupported configuration, we
p
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
Paul Zarnowski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> says:
>
>"This is probably a known issue but ADSM client does not backup Win2000
>System Objects using the Central Scheduler. Does anyone have a
>recommendation for a fix or a workaround? We are using Client ver.
>3.7.2.17 and Se
Create a script to back it up and run it as your pre-scheduled cmd.
--
Joshua S. Bassi
IBM Certified- AIX Support, HACMP, SAN
Enterprise Disk(Shark)& Tape Solutions
Tivoli Certified Consultant - ADSM/TSM
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-Original Message-
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:[EMAIL P
I wonder if you create a small logical volume with the same name if you
could fake it out?
just a thought..
-Original Message-
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of
Joshua S. Bassi
Sent: Friday, December 15, 2000 5:30 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Can't
"This is probably a known issue but ADSM client does not backup Win2000
System Objects using the Central Scheduler. Does anyone have a
recommendation for a fix or a workaround? We are using Client ver.
3.7.2.17 and Server 3.7.4.0.
Thanks in advance for any help."
I have been fighting this issue with client development for the better
part of a year. They are looking to improve the reliability of the return
codes, but officaly the "Do not support them". If you contact Level 2
support with a blatently wrong RC code from a client and let them know,
most likl
All,
I have a customer with a disk storage pool volume that
won't delete. It is a raw logical volume and somehow
it was removed from the system, so it needs to be
purged out of the ADSM database.
del vol /dev/radsmpool19
and
del vol /dev/radsmpool19
Produce a message that indicates "ANRd d
Yes, I just looked. My Quick start (hard copy) for 4.1 says same thing.
HOWEVER the other manuals (hard copy and pdf) from Tivoli still show IPX and SNA as
valid Comm Methods for 4.1 !!!
David B. Longo
Systems Administrator
Health First, Inc. I/T
3300 Fiske Blvd.
Rockledge, FL 32955-4305
End of Service for 3.7 is 1.01.03
Keith Davey
On Fri, 15 Dec 2000, Williams, Tim wrote:
> shame on Tivoli if this was truly not in any readme as a WARNING
>
>
>
>
>
> Kevin Corning-Hyman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> 12/15/2000 08:11 AM
> Please respond to "ADSM: Di
Try clean Archdir
Keith Davey
On Fri, 15 Dec 2000, Hanna Hahne wrote:
> Since we upgraded our Server from ADSM 3.1.2.55 to TSM 3.7.4
> we experience bad archive performance. Compared to the previous
> server it takes 10 times as long to archive a file and it is not
> network or client time. We
Well I am not to sure about what volume contains a file, but if you want
to see what files are in a volume then q content works
Keith Davey
On Fri, 15 Dec 2000, Francisco Molero wrote:
> Hi,
> Would I like to know how I can know in which volume is
> a file ? Is it possible ?
> Where can I fin
In 4.1 there is a new Issue Message command - not sure if this would do what
you want.
>From the TSM 3.7.3 and 4.1 Technical Guide Red book:
The objective of this new parameter is to allow for user defined messages to
be
issued from a server script to determine, if there is a problem with the
co
>Is there a command to create an activity log entry. I didn't see anything
>in the manual; but sometimes are there are undocumented features. I have
>this long running script from which I would like to log progress messages.
Joel - I haven't seen a formal way to do that, but it's easy to put so
Is there a command to create an activity log entry. I didn't see anything
in the manual; but sometimes are there are undocumented features. I have
this long running script from which I would like to log progress messages.
I am using External Schedular Tivoli`s maestro .till today no problem :-)
>We have a desire to move the scheduling of some of our TSM backups out of
>the TSM scheduler, and instead launch them via a scheduling package (Tivoli
>Maestro). I found several threads in the archives refering to the return
>code of "dsmc" not being a reliable mechanism to use to confirm a suc
Hello all,
We have a desire to move the scheduling of some of our TSM backups out of
the TSM scheduler, and instead launch them via a scheduling package (Tivoli
Maestro). I found several threads in the archives refering to the return
code of "dsmc" not being a reliable mechanism to use to confir
>I seem to have a weird backup situation here
>
>I am running backups in a test environment. I'm testing large arrays for file
>servers.
>The 1st sel backup took around 9hrs (80GB), subsequent sel backups are taking
>around 19hrs to complete.
>
>As I am only running sel backups I figure the ADSM d
I believe there is still processing involved in a selective backup. The
TSM server still has to send info to the client, and the pervious versions
of the files are marked inactive. I don't know if that accounts for all
the time you're seeing, but it may. You can check the stats at the end of
th
Hi Walter,
I am not sure if this helps.
We have a client who is using Solaris 7 and Oracle 8.1.5, they installed TDP
2.1. When they installed the required patches 106300 and 106327, the oracle
was broken (I don't know what the error message is), then they installed
other patches 106980-09 106541
Hello all,
I am attempting to configure SNMP with TSM 3.7.3 running on
Solaris 2.7. I have not had much success. I have been using the Admin
Guide for reference. Here is what I have done:
1. Added the following to dsmserv.opt
COMMmethod SNMP
SNMPSUBAGENT HOST 127.0.0.1
> What I think is happening is this:
> Due to the incremental forever backup method the files are becoming
> fragmented on the tapes. A file changes so a new version is
> written to the
> tape. The oldest version is then deleted leaving a gap on
> the tape. The
> problem with fragmented tapes i
I seem to have a weird backup situation here
I am running backups in a test environment. I'm testing large arrays for file
servers.
The 1st sel backup took around 9hrs (80GB), subsequent sel backups are taking
around 19hrs to complete.
As I am only running sel backups I figure the ADSM database
Hi,
We're using 'DFSBACKUPMNTPNT NO'.
We never had any trouble with it.
Of course it would go wrong when a user decides to
create an endless loop or does his
own mounts somewhere, just like you said.
But what is the worst thing that could happen
when one of these thing occurs?
Sure, your backups
Thanks Jack-
When I run dsmcutil showpw, it shows the correct password in the registry
for this machine.
Then when I reboot and run dsmcutil showpw again, it says it can't find the
registry key.
It appears that registry changes are not being saved.
I installed a new version of the client in a ne
>This brings up a question. Does anyone know how long v3.7 will be
>supported?
http://www.tivoli.com/support/storage_mgr/tivolieoc.html
I haven't seen it before. It sounds like your email server isn't receiving
the response it expects back, and keeps resending it.
Damon Burkhart
Operations Analyst
Server Operations
Kmart Corporation
(248)614-0629
-Original Message-
From: Diane Geils [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Fri
On 15-Dec-00 Francisco Molero wrote:
> Hi,
> Would I like to know how I can know in which volume is
> a file ? Is it possible ?
> Where can I find a select for this question.?
> Any info will be good received.
(Example)
Suppose you're looking for the file /home/john/my_file
and /home is a file s
Am I the only one receiving this same message over and over. In the last 5
minutes, I have received this exact message 5 more times. I have already
deleted this one message over 50 times. The same thing is happening to
others in my group. Please let me know, so that I can contact our network
p
We have a 3494 ATL with 6 3590 drives in it. When we upgraded from adsm
3.1.2.50 to v4.1.1.0 the library manager device did not get deleted but the
6 3590 drives did get deleted. We needed to run configuration manager to
get the 3590 drives back.
Jim Sporer
At 09:22 PM 12/14/2000 -0500, you wro
---
This E-mail message (including attachments, if any) is confidential and may
well also be legally privileged from disclosure. It is only for the
person(s) to whom it is addressed. If you have received this e-mail message
in
Peter:
We had considered the idea, but decided against it. The possibility of
loops and/or someone doing something stupid like mounting root.afs was
just too great a risk for us.
We actually create a 'backup tree' before we run backups every night.
This backup tree has mount points for the ba
The TSM client for Open Edition MVS only backs up the MVS Open Edition file
system, also called an HFS file system.
These are UNIX-style file systems with a UNIX-type directory structure that
can coexist on MVS with the standard MVS file systems.
You can't use TSM to back up standard/legacy type
I have a BRP server B for a primary server A that is being backed up by
ADSM.
B has a file space on ADSM Server... Client performs daily restores to B
FROM A.
IS there a way of starting restore on B VIA ADSM SERVER
PLEASE ADVISE
-Original Message-
From: Williams, Tim [mailto:[EMAIL
Hello,
It doesn't seem to be very well documented, but the 4.1 Quick Start
manual mentions:
You can choose one or more communication methods to use with Tivoli Storage
Manager. The
server supports the following communication methods:
Shared memory
TCP/IP
HTTP (for the administrat
Hi *SM'ers,
1. I'd like to know if anyone is using this option in the following
format:
AFSbackupmntpnt NO
or the DFS-pendant
DFSbackupmntpnt NO
2. anyone using this option in the above form could they report on positive
or BAD experiences (e.g. having trouble by users doing own
shame on Tivoli if this was truly not in any readme as a WARNING
Kevin Corning-Hyman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
12/15/2000 08:11 AM
Please respond to "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>@SMTP@Exchange
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]@SMTP@Exchange
Can you please stop sending out all of these e-mails. You are overloading
our server.
"Mark S." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>@VM.MARIST.EDU> on 12/14/2000 03:42:01 PM
Please respond to "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent by: "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL
Posted this yesterday but didn't see anything today. Was wondering if anyone
might have seen this before.
Thanks,
Geoff Gill
NT Systems Support Engineer
SAIC
Computer Systems Group
E-Mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Phone: (858) 826-4062
Pager: (888) 997-9614
> -Original Message-
>From: Gil
Does AutoVault has the capability to take into consideration that the tapes
need to be offsite regardless of the fact that it has a copy pool or not?
Basically trying to ask if it covers both scnarios?
Thanks
-Original Message-
From: Bob Bailey [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, Dec
That is exactly what happened. My DBA indicates the interface USED to work.
Then, when they upgraded (Both HP-UX and Informix), the interface just quit.
That's the problem. Does anyone know of a workaround???
Once again, Server is TSM 3.7.2 on AIX 4.3.2 (3466-C00). Client is HP-UX
11.0 with Infor
I'm not sure if this has been covered before, but IPXSPX, NETBIOS and SNA are no
longer valid COMMunication METHODs in your dsmserv.opt in v4.1 We found out the hard
way after upgrading from v3.1 to v3.7 then to v4.1 yesterday. Our three hour install
ended up being 11 hours after having to do
The only way to send them offsite is to copy them to a copypool. DRM will
not send your archive tapes offsite. We use AutoVault (www.coderelief.com)
instead of DRM for offsite vaulting. It can vault your clients archive
tapes offsite without the need to copy them to a copypool. It can also
vau
Gavin,
Could you share some more of the details re the sun bare metal restore
with me also?
Thanks,
Jim
Hello,
don't get confused about open edition (or Unix system services or USS) on
MVS, and the fact that you're running the MVS system on a P/390 card in a
RS6K. Both have nothing to do with each other. For the backup from within
MVS, you won't be able to do anything with the open edition or USS T
Since we upgraded our Server from ADSM 3.1.2.55 to TSM 3.7.4
we experience bad archive performance. Compared to the previous
server it takes 10 times as long to archive a file and it is not
network or client time. We see high DB activity and wait at the
server. We use TSM as archive backend for ra
Hi,
Would I like to know how I can know in which volume is
a file ? Is it possible ?
Where can I find a select for this question.?
Any info will be good received.
Thanks for all,
Fran
__
Do You Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Shopping - Thousands of Stores. Milli
I believe If the management class has copymode=absolute it should do a full
backup but still go through the include/exclude list.
What I would like to do is be able to have two management classes in the
same policy,(one doing incrementals one doing fulls) and be able to switch
betweeen them.
I am trying to set up an ADIC Fastor7 unit on my TSM 4.1 NT server. I have
looked on the TSM web site, the eleent no. to use is 86. When I issue my define
drive statement and give it element no. 86 I get the error :
ANR8366E DEFINE DRIVE: Invalid value for ELEMENT parameter
The command I issue
Hi ,
S/390 system is emulated in on RS6K - S/390 DASDs are emulated in files -
you have to shutdown S/390 OS
to get consistent system backup of S/390 environment. I solved somethink
similar on OS/2 version - if you are
interested on details contact me directly.
Petr
- Pùvodní zpráva -
TSM TDP'rs,
Experiencing a very strange and annoying problem after configuring the Oracle
TPD agent on a SUN 7 system. As soon as the TDP's libobk.so is bound to Oracle
thru make . Oracle starts complaining that its control files are corrupt.
Something to do with the SCN not being what it sh
Jeff,
You might be able to get TDP for Notes (ADSMConnect Agent
for Lotus Notes) to work on Domino R5 but this
is not a supported platform by IBM/Tivoli.
TDP for Lotus Domino is the only supported "agent"
for Domino R5.
(FWIW, I think that investing in DASD is a small
price to pay for the benef
Hi everyone
I have a customer that has a requirement to backup a S/390 system. The
S/390 is a card residing in a RS6000.
Has anyone had any experience with this. I am trying to find out if the
client does a complete system backup or only backups up the file system
Please excuse my ignorance. S
59 matches
Mail list logo
