Is anyone backing up an AIX node using ADSM client level 3.1.0.7 to a 4.1.x
TSM Server? If yes, have you done a restore.
As I read the web page
http://www.tivoli.com/support/storage_mgr/compatibility.html
the ADSM client is "not supported"; but it doesn't say that it won't work.
Geoff,
Tivoli Data Protection for Lotus Domino was built to
solve the problem you are asking about. It uses the
specialized API written specifically for taking online
*hot* backups. It also utilizes the transaction logging
introduced by Domino R5 to allow you to perform up to
the second restores
Ah, got it. After looking at the implementation guide as Joel suggested
(duh, why didn't I think of that) and getting the correct syntax (why isn't
it in the Admin Ref), I found out what I was doing wrong.
I had it nearly right to start with when I did
> > DEF CLIENTO FRED INCLEXCL "ex /foo/*"
b
Joel means "Getting Started with Tivoli Storage Manager: Implementation
Guide", SG24-5416-01from www.redbooks.ibm.com.
In your example,
def cliento inclexcl exclude /kernel/genunix
the name of the client option set which is to have this particular client
option associated with is missing. So add
Go get the redbook whose title is something like "getting started with
ADSM". It will save you a lot of false starts.
I use something like this:
/* Base Option Set */
define cloptset base description='Base Set'
define clientopt base dirmc dir
define clientopt base schedmode prompted
define cl
Michel Engels wrote:
> You have to combine both syntaxes. an example would look like:
>
> DEF CLIENTO FRED INCLEXCL EXCLUDE "/foo/*"
>
Well I thought this looked hopeful, but no such luck. It still complains
about EXCLUDE as an invalid keyword. The full output is as follows:
tsm: TESTSERVER>def
Nick, thanks for the advice. We re-ran the migration and saw it stall again.
However this time around we waited quite a bit longer. It eventually timed-out
on a disk-read error and then proceeded with the remainder of the migration.
It's progressing nicely now.
The disk error is a different pro
Notes backup every Night.. WOW !!!
The size of our notes environment about 1TB only allow us to backup the .NSF
once week. We do fuzzy backups in the middle of the night so Most of the
database are not very active then.
The Domino 5 sever has transaction logging. We have the Domino agent but
Questions again...
I have Notes people who don't want to use the Notes and Domino agents to
backup their files. Why? They say they don't like it. So who am I to tell
them they have to use it, I don't care.
Now the other day one of the databases went down and it had to be restored
to a nightly fr
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, "Marc D. Taylor"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> says:
>
>Was there ever a solution to this problem? I just installed this client on
>a macos9 machine and am exhibiting the same behavior.
>
>Marc Taylor
I can not answer for 3.7 but Tivoli thinks that they have a fixtest
for th
If the file is 6GB, migration, backup storagepool, or any other data
movement commands won't change status until the file is complete. I have
some 45GB database backups that seem to take forever to move in reclaims,
and the process seems to just sit there. Then suddenly it's moved the 45GB
file,
Clarification: The Migration process does not fail, but stops progressing - the
statistics reported by 'query process' for the Migration stop changing.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] on 09-Oct-2000 11:41
Please respond to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: ADSM-L
cc:(bcc: Kent J Monthei/CIS/PHRD/SB_PLC)
Sub
I'm a mainframe person that is new to server backups, ADSM and this list.
When I try the SELECT * FROM BACKUPS for a specific node, the command goes
on and on and on, but I do notice that the DIR all say STANDARD and the
files all say DEFAULT. I guess I still don't know why the files say
"DEFAUL
Yes... Offsite copy pool volumes will be reclaimed when the reclamation
threshold for your copypool has been reached. Tapes with access=offsite and
in the copypool do not need to have a FULL status to be reclaimed. Once a
copypool volume with an access=offsite has been reclaimed, it will have a
I'm going to assume you're talking a TSM 3.7 client...
I have seen this at a client site where their idletimeout was set too low.
These second sessions you're seeing are from the RESOURCEUTILIZATION which
defaults to 2. TSM will start a session for session communications and
another for transferr
What do you mean by stall? Does it fail with an error code, does the process
hang???
-Original Message-
From: Kent J. Monthei [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, October 09, 2000 11:37 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Troubleshooting Help Needed / MIGRATION stalls about 500MB into
ADSM 3.1.2.20 / Solaris 2.6 HW 5/98 - We tried stopping/restarting Migration,
also killing/restarting 'dsmserv'. We also tried varying that tape drive
offline first, also marking that tape volume 'readonly' first so it couldn't be
used. Still, Migation keeps stalling at the same point. We also
If I have several servers that previously were bound to an archive policy of
180 days and I create a new management policy to 90 days and now set the
archive backup to point to that management policy- when will the additional
90 days expire from all the existing archive data. I no longer want to
r
It will trigger a reclaim when it reaches the reclamation threshold.
>>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] 10/09/00 05:22AM >>>
Hi
When I manually update a copypoolvolume with access=offsite, put it in the
vault, and it still has volume status "Filling", will it then be reclaimed
if it reaches reclaimation thres
Take a look at " Logical volume manager A to Z " ... Good Book..
Shekhar Dhotre.
Certified AIX 4.3.3. ADMINISTARTATOR.
HACMP certified
MCSE.
"[EMAIL PROTECTED]/P=Internet/A= /C=us" on 10/06/2000 01:38:43 PM
Please respond to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]/P=Internet/A= /C=us" @ X400
To: "[
Was there ever a solution to this problem? I just installed this client on
a macos9 machine and am exhibiting the same behavior.
Marc Taylor
At 09:33 6/12/2000 -0400, Todd Zenker wrote:
>I'm having problems running the scheduler with version 3.7. Need to know
>the steps on how to run it. The
Sharing info. I've been 'hit' by the anr8355e messages after upgrading to
3.7.3.8.
I've included the apar information below for those how may not have noticed
messages appearing in
their actlog.
FYI Thanks Tim
* I went to 3.7.3.8 because of frequent core dumps because of expiration.*
Item IC281
You could create multiple node definitions for the client and install
multiple schedule services, one for each node you create...
-Original Message-
From: HK Chng [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, October 09, 2000 10:08 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Scheduling and Management
Hello all,
I have the following request from a user and hoped that someone out
there has gotton passed the limitation of scheduling through TSM
scheduler( I am running TSM 3.7.3 on AIX 4.3.3 ): the user requested to
have a incremental backups of their data carried out daily with version
co
The error message is a response to file being in use.
0X0020 The process cannot access the file because it is being used
by another process.
Arturo
-Original Message-
From: Warren, Matthew James [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, October 06, 2000
Can you help me with silent install? I did found a reply of you in the ADSM
Forum dated "1999, may 13". Now I want to use this method for a client
installation on SUN Solaris but this does not work. Still some questions are
asked that has to be answered. Did you try allready a silent installation
I think the inclexcl one is right but you need to include a number to
specify which order to process the options...
-Original Message-
From: Walker, Lesley R [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, October 09, 2000 1:16 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Option file and optionset
R
When we started looking at *sm, here's what I did:
Printed off read the *sm technical guides from the
IBM redbook web site. Start with the ADSM V3 Technical Guide.
Go through the Administration Guide.
If you can swing it, take a class.
On 6 Oct 2000, at 4:47, m
This is the opsys level:
SunOS spadux0001 5.7 Generic_106541-08 sun4u sparc SUNW,Ultra-Enterprise
All the packages were installed with pkgadd from the same official
Tivoli-supplied 4.1.0 CDROM. I have since tried moving the client code to
4.1.1 (IP22087) with no change. I have now removed the 4.
>When I manually update a copypoolvolume with access=offsite, put it in the
>vault, and it still has volume status "Filling", will it then be reclaimed
>if it reaches reclaimation threshold for the copypool ? Or does it need to
>have volume status "Full" to be reclaimed ? If it does, how do I circ
>We have installed TSM 4.1 Server and Client code on a newly-built
>Sun/Solaris system. The server (+ PTF1) runs fine, but when we try to start
>the client code - DSMC or DSMADMC - we get the following error:
>
>$ dsmadmc
>
>ld.so.1: dsmadmc: fatal: relocation error: file dsmadmc: symbol
>_ex_regi
Please, anybody can tell me if it's possible to
install the TSM client in a alternative path (not
/usr/tivoli ...) in a AIX 4.3 node? (using smitty or
not)
Thanks a lot.
Regards, Alex from Spain.
__
Do You Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Photos - 35mm Quality Pri
Anders,
yes,
the volume will be reclaimed when it reaches the reclamation treshhold for
the copy pool.
When you ask on how to circumvent the "problem", I suppose you mean that
you do not want reclamation to run on the copy pool volumes, since they are
offsite. First of all: copy pool volumes, eve
You have to combine both syntaxes. an example would look like:
DEF CLIENTO FRED INCLEXCL EXCLUDE "/foo/*"
I do think the documentation is not complete. None of the options is explained.
Some of the options are old onces that existed in ADSM 3.1 but in the 3.7
manuals you have to guess for the sy
We have installed TSM 4.1 Server and Client code on a newly-built
Sun/Solaris system. The server (+ PTF1) runs fine, but when we try to start
the client code - DSMC or DSMADMC - we get the following error:
$ dsmadmc
ld.so.1: dsmadmc: fatal: relocation error: file dsmadmc: symbol
_ex_register64:
Hi
When I manually update a copypoolvolume with access=offsite, put it in the
vault, and it still has volume status "Filling", will it then be reclaimed
if it reaches reclaimation threshold for the copypool ? Or does it need to
have volume status "Full" to be reclaimed ? If it does, how do I circu
36 matches
Mail list logo
