perfect!
Deb
On Mon, Jul 31, 2023 at 11:15 AM Dan Garcia Carrillo
wrote:
> Dear Deb,
>
> Thank you for your time to review the document.
>
>
> El 25/7/23 a las 1:01, Deb Cooley via Datatracker escribió:
> > Reviewer: Deb Cooley
> > Review result: Has Issue
El 23/1/24 a las 13:07, Deb Cooley via Datatracker escribió:
>
> Reviewer: Deb Cooley
> Review result: Has Nits
>
> I have reviewed this document as part of the security directorate's
> ongoing effort to review all IETF documents being processed by the
> IESG. These comments we
] https://github.com/ace-wg/ace-revoked-token-notification/pull/17
>
>
> On 2024-07-06 15:32, Deb Cooley via Datatracker wrote:
>
> Deb Cooley has entered the following ballot position for
> draft-ietf-ace-revoked-token-notification-08: No Objection
>
> When responding, please keep t
You want to do this now? After (or your ask was right before) the telechat?
If you want to do this, I'd like the working group to weigh in (for
whatever definition of 'working group' is best - at least lamps, and likely
others).
Deb
On Thu, May 8, 2025 at 12:11 PM Toerless Eckert wrote:
> I
> consensus}
>
> Benjamin Kaduk wrote:
> > On Thu, May 08, 2025 at 10:45:54PM +0100, Michael Richardson wrote:
> >> Deb Cooley wrote: > You want to do this now?
> >> After (or your ask was right before) the telechat?
> >>
> >>
crickets? What is the plan?
The PR is ok, except you need to add something to the abstract to say you
are updating RFC 9148.
Deb
On Tue, May 20, 2025 at 12:34 PM Michael Richardson
wrote:
> Michael Richardson wrote:
> > Deb Cooley wrote:
> >> I'd like to
I don't see any comments except for those who commented above (Toerless and
Ben). Do your coauthors agree?
Deb
On Fri, Jun 27, 2025 at 1:45 PM Michael Richardson wrote:
> Deb Cooley wrote:
> > crickets? What is the plan?
>
> I don't think its up to me to sa
Reviewer: Deb Cooley
Review result: Has Issues
I have reviewed this document as part of the security directorate's
ongoing effort to review all IETF documents being processed by the
IESG. These comments were written primarily for the benefit of the
security area directors. Document editor
Reviewer: Deb Cooley
Review result: Has Nits
I have reviewed this document as part of the security directorate's
ongoing effort to review all IETF documents being processed by the
IESG. These comments were written primarily for the benefit of the
security area directors. Document editors a
Deb Cooley has entered the following ballot position for
draft-ietf-ace-revoked-token-notification-08: No Objection
When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
introductory paragraph, however
Deb Cooley has entered the following ballot position for
draft-ietf-ace-wg-coap-eap-11: No Objection
When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
introductory paragraph, however.)
Please refer to
11 matches
Mail list logo
