Any plans for Plan 9 5th edition?
My desires:
ISO-compliant C compiler and preprocessor
Port other programming languages (especially Go) to here
Start a source code repository
Port Git, SVN, Mercurial, et cetera to here
Add one more: EFI support
Also, can Plan 9 be booted on Open Firmware? (Used on at least Sun SPARC
workstations)
On Nov 16, 2016 5:27 PM, "Charlie Lin" wrote:
> Any plans for Plan 9 5th edition?
>
> My desires:
> ISO-compliant C compiler and preprocessor
> Port ot
Who has write access to the Wiki so that we can put the ideas in a TODO
list?
Also does anyone want to host the source tree in a repository?
On Nov 16, 2016 7:21 PM, "Charlie Lin" wrote:
> Add one more: EFI support
> Also, can Plan 9 be booted on Open Firmware? (Used on at
I have the ANSI X3.159-1989 (C89), the ISO/IEC 9989:1990 (C90) (ANSI
version) and ISO/IEC 9989:1999 (C99).
The first one I found it at the National Technical Reports Library. The
other two I do not know where I obtained them but I know they are on the
Internet, as final standards, not drafts.
On
My idea: implement a user-space filesystem to expose all EFI variables.
As for the bootloader, any ideas?
On Wed, Nov 16, 2016 at 7:30 PM, Kurt H Maier wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 16, 2016 at 07:21:14PM -0500, Charlie Lin wrote:
> > Add one more: EFI support
> > Also, can Plan 9 be
Like efivarfs in the Linux kernel
On Fri, Nov 18, 2016 at 2:54 PM, Charlie Lin wrote:
> My idea: implement a user-space filesystem to expose all EFI variables.
> As for the bootloader, any ideas?
>
> On Wed, Nov 16, 2016 at 7:30 PM, Kurt H Maier wrote:
>
>> On Wed, Nov 1
My mistake for hastiness: should we implement the filesystem in kernel or
user space?
On Fri, Nov 18, 2016 at 2:57 PM, Charlie Lin wrote:
> Like efivarfs in the Linux kernel
>
> On Fri, Nov 18, 2016 at 2:54 PM, Charlie Lin
> wrote:
>
>> My idea: implement a user-space fil
Add one more: XHCI (USB 3.0) support, because the USB device driver
currently does not support it, as stated in the USB man page in section 3
On Nov 16, 2016 17:27, "Charlie Lin" wrote:
> Any plans for Plan 9 5th edition?
>
> My desires:
> ISO-compliant C compiler and pre
Any features that should be incorporated into Plan 9?
Also, where are the developers? Do they still maintain it? If not, I guess
we assume the role of maintainers...
On Nov 16, 2016 17:27, "Charlie Lin" wrote:
> Any plans for Plan 9 5th edition?
>
> My desires:
> ISO-co
Since the Lucida fonts distributed with the OS are not redistributable when
alone (and thus not open-source), what alternatives are available?
I suggest the Liberation font family.
Since the POSIX standard is updated to POSIX.1-2008 with the 2016 TC, the
commands should be updated as well.
Also, how to submit either a patch or a contribution?
11 matches
Mail list logo