My mistake for hastiness: should we implement the filesystem in kernel or user space?
On Fri, Nov 18, 2016 at 2:57 PM, Charlie Lin <charlieli...@gmail.com> wrote: > Like efivarfs in the Linux kernel > > On Fri, Nov 18, 2016 at 2:54 PM, Charlie Lin <charlieli...@gmail.com> > wrote: > >> My idea: implement a user-space filesystem to expose all EFI variables. >> As for the bootloader, any ideas? >> >> On Wed, Nov 16, 2016 at 7:30 PM, Kurt H Maier <k...@sciops.net> wrote: >> >>> On Wed, Nov 16, 2016 at 07:21:14PM -0500, Charlie Lin wrote: >>> > Add one more: EFI support >>> > Also, can Plan 9 be booted on Open Firmware? (Used on at least Sun >>> SPARC >>> > workstations) >>> > >>> > On Nov 16, 2016 5:27 PM, "Charlie Lin" <charlieli...@gmail.com> wrote: >>> > >>> > > Any plans for Plan 9 5th edition? >>> > > >>> > > My desires: >>> > > ISO-compliant C compiler and preprocessor >>> > > Port other programming languages (especially Go) to here >>> > > Start a source code repository >>> > > Port Git, SVN, Mercurial, et cetera to here >>> > > >>> >>> >>> These are great ideas, is there some central place you can write these >>> down so we don't lose track of our goals >>> >>> >> >
