if anyone has the ipxe setup for 9pc64 I'm interested. I get nothing on
boot, I'm assuming I need some args. I did try
imagargs 9pc64 console=0
but no good.
On Sat, Feb 8, 2025 at 11:07 AM ron minnich wrote:
> I'll give it another go. The pcengines are EOL, THANK YOU X86 VENDORS, but
> they're
I have a GMKtec G3 N100 mini pc which has been running 9front ok for the
past few months.
It is very cheap (I paid £63 delivered to the UK with 8GB RAM, 256GB
NVME installed), x86, quiet, virtualization capable and multicore.
It's not usb-c powered out the box but you can use a barrel jack to
The new default branch is 9front. https://github.com/rminnich/9front
I just pushed a commit that:
1. has the execac command use sysr1 for now
2. drops bootrc into a shell before root is mounted so you can poke around
and run execac
3. adds ratrace, execac, and date
When you build nix, look in sys
ok that's fixed and:
% ratrace -c execac -c 1 /bin/date
98 execac Running 204326 0x1prepage: base 0x7efff000 top 0x7000
prepage: base 0x20 top 0x40
prepage: base 0x40 top 0x406000
prepage: base 0x406000 top 0x406000
/bin/date: timezone: file does not exist: '/env/timezone'
Nice! Congratulations!
On Sat, Feb 8, 2025, 9:13 a.m. ron minnich wrote:
> ok that's fixed and:
>
> % ratrace -c execac -c 1 /bin/date
> 98 execac Running 204326 0x1prepage: base 0x7efff000 top 0x7000
> prepage: base 0x20 top 0x40
> prepage: base 0x40 top 0x406000
> pr
Has anyone seen apu2 or apu4 work with a 9front, legacy, or other kernel
lately?
They used to work with harvey, but IIRC I had to do something there.
BTW, kudos to 9front for cleaning up handling invalid msrs handling ...
that little thing in trap is nice.
(If you wonder what I mean, go take a l
I saw in http://www.collyer.net/who/geoff/9/ 9k specific code for apu2 I think.
--
9fans: 9fans
Permalink:
https://9fans.topicbox.com/groups/9fans/Tc854faa405e28b32-M7122b830e16322f477741e98
Delivery options: https://9fans.topicbox.com/groups/9fans/subscript
I believe they work, but they're also EoL: https://www.pcengines.ch/eol.htm
Quoth ron minnich :
> Has anyone seen apu2 or apu4 work with a 9front, legacy, or other kernel
> lately?
>
> They used to work with harvey, but IIRC I had to do something there.
>
> BTW, kudos to 9front for cleaning up h
hi ron,
i used to run the fs on an apu2c4 (from 2017 till around 2021); no problems
whatsoever.
best,
-rodri
On Sat, Feb 8, 2025, 18:16 ron minnich wrote:
> Has anyone seen apu2 or apu4 work with a 9front, legacy, or other kernel
> lately?
>
> They used to work with harvey, but IIRC I had to
I'll give it another go. The pcengines are EOL, THANK YOU X86 VENDORS, but
they're still quite nice.
On Sat, Feb 8, 2025 at 10:39 AM Rodrigo G. López
wrote:
> hi ron,
>
> i used to run the fs on an apu2c4 (from 2017 till around 2021); no
> problems whatsoever.
>
>
> best,
>
> -rodri
>
> On Sat,
if you want to see an interesting example of the kind of machine we had in
mind for NIX:
https://www.esperanto.ai/technology/
4 superscalar risc-v cores, and about 1000 basic scalar cores.
Pretty interesting.
On Fri, Feb 7, 2025 at 9:21 AM ron minnich wrote:
> I checked in execac system call
I take it back :-) if anyone has a plan9.ini for netbooting apu2, that
would help. 9bootpxe is working so far.
On Sat, Feb 8, 2025 at 12:23 PM ron minnich wrote:
> if anyone has the ipxe setup for 9pc64 I'm interested. I get nothing on
> boot, I'm assuming I need some args. I did try
> imagargs
i got a little arm processor hand held device -- something like what you
are thinking about I think,...
trying to get P9 ARM onto it at the minute...
On Sat, Feb 8, 2025 at 6:39 PM wrote:
> I believe they work, but they're also EoL:
> https://www.pcengines.ch/eol.htm
>
> Quoth ron minnich :
> >
13 matches
Mail list logo
