Re: [9fans] 9ttp

2011-09-09 Thread Charles Forsyth
>> iirc, async clunks are dangerous. >> >> -erik >I never agreed with that conclusion from the oct 2010 discussion here. `dangerous' is not the right word; they simply confound the use of the protocol

Re: [9fans] 9ttp

2011-09-09 Thread Bruce Ellis
I think that all good, right thinking people in this country are sick and tired of being told that all good, right thinking people in this country are fed up with being told that all good, right thinking people in this country are fed up with being sick and tired. I'm certainly not, and I'm sick a

Re: [9fans] 9ttp

2011-09-09 Thread dexen deVries
On Friday 09 of September 2011 11:26:18 Bruce Ellis wrote: > I think that all good, right thinking people in this country are sick > and tired of being told that all good, right thinking people in this > country are fed up with being told that all good, right thinking > people in this country are f

Re: [9fans] 9ttp

2011-09-09 Thread Bruce Ellis
That was a seriously good get. I've heard there is a serious build up of SAT (surface-to-air tapas) deployment in Spain. I will talk about Inferno Multi Processor experience in these matters in a WIP, or a tapas bar. Unfortunately my Spanish tutor was deported for unspecified reasons, and listeni

Re: [9fans] mail client; general question web vs command

2011-09-09 Thread Rudolf Sykora
Hello, On 31 August 2011 16:22, Richard Miller <9f...@hamnavoe.com> wrote: > To use the plan9port version of upas/smtp with authenticated connections, > you need a couple of fixes which I've just submitted. 'hg pull -u' will > get them. > > The plan9port upas/smtp also does not support tls, which