>> iirc, async clunks are dangerous. >> >> -erik >I never agreed with that conclusion from the oct 2010 discussion here.
`dangerous' is not the right word; they simply confound the use of the protocol
>> iirc, async clunks are dangerous. >> >> -erik >I never agreed with that conclusion from the oct 2010 discussion here.
`dangerous' is not the right word; they simply confound the use of the protocol