Re: [9fans] purposeful omission or amnesia

2008-09-13 Thread Uriel
Yea, fascism and censure will solve the problem! God forbid we stop feeding the trolls! Peace uriel On Sat, Sep 13, 2008 at 6:53 AM, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >>> s/completely/almost &/ >> >> Please don't try to educate me > > This is a mailing list, not your private forum. I'd like to repeat

Re: [9fans] purposeful omission or amnesia

2008-09-13 Thread sqweek
On Sat, Sep 13, 2008 at 12:53 PM, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > This is a mailing list, not your private forum. I'd like to repeat > the call to suspend anonymous posters. What exactly is an "anonymous poster"? -sqweek

Re: [9fans] purposeful omission or amnesia

2008-09-13 Thread hiro
On Sat, Sep 13, 2008 at 4:54 PM, sqweek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Sat, Sep 13, 2008 at 12:53 PM, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> This is a mailing list, not your private forum. I'd like to repeat >> the call to suspend anonymous posters. > > What exactly is an "anonymous poster"? > -sqweek >

Re: [9fans] purposeful omission or amnesia

2008-09-13 Thread lucio
> What exactly is an "anonymous poster"? Good question. I'll back down, let's encourage purely confrontational postings. Cheers! ++L

Re: [9fans] cin is in

2008-09-13 Thread Iruata Souza
On Sat, Sep 13, 2008 at 3:45 AM, Michaelian Ennis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Sat, Sep 13, 2008 at 12:11 AM, Bruce Ellis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> I don't know how you get the source but it is a cool program. >> >> It can simulate itself simulating itself simulating another program. >> Lots

Re: [9fans] patch/create problem (error?)

2008-09-13 Thread Antonin Vecera
On Fri, Sep 12, 2008 at 8:16 PM, erik quanstrom <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> Anyway, does 9P and Plan9 know about "path MTU discovery"? > > traditional path mtu uses icmp messages. if your router/modem/whatever > eats icmp, you're outta luck with these traditional methods. > cf. http://www.nethea

Re: [9fans] cin is in

2008-09-13 Thread Bruce Ellis
CINT has nothing to do with cin. There is a good paper on cin in the 9th Edition docs. It went on to become vice, which has an X interface, or samuel, which has a sam interface. CINT looks pretty sucky. brucee On Sun, Sep 14, 2008 at 3:44 AM, Iruata Souza <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Sat, S

Re: [9fans] patch/create problem (error?)

2008-09-13 Thread Dave Eckhardt
> fn cp {cpmtu -m 700 $*} How about dd? Dave Eckhardt

Re: [9fans] patch/create problem (error?)

2008-09-13 Thread erik quanstrom
On Sat Sep 13 21:13:15 EDT 2008, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > fn cp {cpmtu -m 700 $*} > > How about dd? > > Dave Eckhardt > dd behaves differently from cp, and patch/create uses cp. in particular cp tries to copy the mode bits along. i thought it would be easier to be correct in adding 4 line

Re: [9fans] cin is in

2008-09-13 Thread Iruata Souza
On Sat, Sep 13, 2008 at 7:52 PM, Bruce Ellis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > CINT has nothing to do with cin. There is a good paper on cin in the > 9th Edition docs. > > It went on to become vice, which has an X interface, or samuel, which > has a sam interface. > > CINT looks pretty sucky. > your ey