On Mon, 14 Jul 2008 13:33:01 PDT "Roman V. Shaposhnik" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> Solaris's scheduler is not shy when it comes to big iron (100+ CPU SMP
> boxes) but even it had to be heavily tuned when a Batoka box first
> came to the labs. When you have physcical threads (CPUs), virtual
> thr
(In the opposite style to usual, this was meant to go to the list, not
private :)
i didn't want to sound over-confident. but vblade
is very simple; i don't see how it could have data-loosing
bugs.
I can't even remember how I made it blue-screen but I managed it a
couple of times. I think o
Hello all,
I would like to ask a question: when I am doing "fshalt" I got this screen:
1. server# fshalt
2. syncing.../srv/fscons...prompt: venti...
3. halting.../srv/fscons...archive vac:03f1ac6d50d1d191405b33e7f6
4. srv -AWP replica
5. prompt:
6. done halting
7. fsSnapshot snap: file system is
> 1. server# fshalt
> 2. syncing.../srv/fscons...prompt: venti...
> 3. halting.../srv/fscons...archive vac:03f1ac6d50d1d191405b33e7f6
> 4. srv -AWP replica
> 5. prompt:
> 6. done halting
> 7. fsSnapshot snap: file system is halted
>
> "fshalt" sometimes stops at line 6 and sometimes (after a minut
I'm pretty sure the line 7 isn't part of the halting procedure. It just
indicates that it's time for fossil to do a new snapshot which isn't
possible because the file system is halted. So just believe fshalt when it
claims it is done.
* Antonin Vecera ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> Hello all,
>
> I
> In the Linux world kvlade looks the way to go for performance but it
> didn't work on AMD64 when I tried it. I guess the Coraid boxes make Plan
> 9 go fast enough so I just need to stop worrying about it.
plan 9 is a good platform; it is very speedy and doesn't do anything
to you. we didn't nee
Indeed,
I have been toying around with the idea of building a larger scale
version of Mr. Minnich's lunchbox using Mini-ITX boards..
But I have no justification, since virtually everything i need to do
with plan 9 happens impossibly fast on just a simple vmware instance.
Plan9 is sufficiently speed
just a little warning for upas/smtpd users.
/mail/lib/smtpd.conf "ournets" is carte blanche
to relay email and modern windows viruses are
good at finding mail servers. so it's best
to limit ournets to the smallest possible set.
if you're not forwarding email to plan 9
from another machine with no
> Indeed,
> I have been toying around with the idea of building a larger scale
> version of Mr. Minnich's lunchbox using Mini-ITX boards..
> But I have no justification, since virtually everything i need to do
> with plan 9 happens impossibly fast on just a simple vmware instance.
> Plan9 is suffic
Hi,
I want to setup my new plan9 termnial with a UK keyboard. I found kbmap
but this appears to be an interactive program. Even if you do
kbmap /sys/lib/kbmap/uk
it still acts in an interactive manner. Is this right?
A qick glance at the code reveals that
cp /sys/lib
IIRC, putting kbmap=uk
in plan9.ini should work.
On Tue, Jul 15, 2008 at 9:47 PM, Robert Hibberdine
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I want to setup my new plan9 termnial with a UK keyboard. I found kbmap but
> this appears to be an interactive program. Even if you do
>
> kbmap /sys
> From: "roger peppe" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> one thing that has bugged me in the past: upas relies on file -m to
> determine the type of attachments, but file only reads the first block
> of the file, so if you've got a utf-8 file with the first non-ascii character
> beyond the 8192nd byte, you get
coming as no suprise, the pc port of plan 9
does work just fine with 8 cores.
mpls; cat /dev/sysstat
0 14271 21350133991116 0
0 0 99 0
19116 1051772279 812 0
>coming as no suprise, the pc port of plan 9
>does work just fine with 8 cores.
Just out of interest, what's the machine?
<>
Which hardware platform is that?
-mlw
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of erik quanstrom
Sent: Tuesday, July 15, 2008 3:29 PM
To: 9fans@9fans.net
Subject: [9fans] 8 cores
coming as no suprise, the pc port of plan 9 does work just fine with 8
On 15-Jul-08, at 1:01 AM, Bakul Shah wrote:
I suspect a lot of this complexity will end up being dropped
when you don't have to worry about efficiently using the last
N% of cpu cycles.
Would that I weren't working on a multi-core graphics part... That N%
is what the game is all about.
W
add this one to the list:
http://9fans.net/archive/2003/12/182
> Which hardware platform is that?
> -mlw
it's a generic xeon 5400-based machine.
- erik
I'd like to ask a question, but before I do, feel I should say, I've been on
this list long enough to understand that Plan 9 is a research vessel, not an OS
that's targeted at commercial deployment...
That being said, while huge scalability is certainly research-worthy, does
anyone actually run
OS X has this command 'open', which I'm told exists or is
available on other unixes. It's about as close as you get to
'plumb' when in foreign lands. You call it like 'open
http://9fans.net' or 'open /etc/passwd' and it does more
or less what you'd expect, finding (usually) the right app.
I mostly
20 matches
Mail list logo
