Hi,
Does anyone use webfs for anything other than abaco support?
I have made some local changes to support a webdav client and
am going to submit them as a pacth - they don't effect abaco,
but I wouldn't want to break anything else out there.
-Steve
I have been working on some improvments to webfs which I shall push out very
soon.
Webfs is good as far as it goes, but it is missing some things, different
content
encodings (gzip etc) and persistent sessions are the most obvious ones.
Basicially it is an http 1.0 client which has some 1.1 exte
On Sat, Nov 13, 2010 at 12:56 PM, erik quanstrom wrote:
> > In longer terms, I'd also replace mozilla's handling of other
> > protocols, eg. ftp, by an webfs implementation.
> >
> >
> > What do you think about this ?
>
> webfs is client side, not server side.
>
> - erik
>
> I must confess, I under
> In longer terms, I'd also replace mozilla's handling of other
> protocols, eg. ftp, by an webfs implementation.
>
>
> What do you think about this ?
webfs is client side, not server side.
- erik
Hi folks,
I'm now thinking about changing mozilla to use webfs instead of
its own protocol handling for quite some while (the whole caching
machinery should also be kicked off in this process and delegated
to either an local proxy like wwwoffle or implemented in webfs).
The big question to me n
OK. Thanks you.
> ok, it looks like the functions are called fsopen(), fsread(), etc in
> plan9port, as I tried to implied regular open, read, etc won't work
ok, it looks like the functions are called fsopen(), fsread(), etc in plan9port,
as I tried to implied regular open, read, etc won't work
On Fri, Jul 23, 2010 at 9:16 AM, Federico G. Benavento
wrote:
> webget
>
> On Fri, Jul 23, 2010 at 9:04 AM, EBo wrote:
>>
>>> is webkit using read9p() and fri
> webget
>
> On Fri, Jul 23, 2010 at 9:04 AM, EBo wrote:
>>
>>> is webkit using read9p() and friends instead of regular reads?
>>
>> regular reads. Nothing in webfs is using read9p.
>>
>> Should I change some or all of them for testing?
yes. I am talking about the source code for both webget
webget
On Fri, Jul 23, 2010 at 9:04 AM, EBo wrote:
>
>> is webkit using read9p() and friends instead of regular reads?
>
> regular reads. Nothing in webfs is using read9p.
>
> Should I change some or all of them for testing?
>
>
>
>
>
>
--
Federico G. Benavento
> is webkit using read9p() and friends instead of regular reads?
regular reads. Nothing in webfs is using read9p.
Should I change some or all of them for testing?
I meant webget
On Fri, Jul 23, 2010 at 8:56 AM, Federico G. Benavento
wrote:
> is webkit using read9p() and friends instead of regular reads?
>
>
> On Thu, Jul 22, 2010 at 10:59 AM, EBo wrote:
>> I'm getting lots of "Numerical result out of range" when running webfs and
>> webget in plan9port.
is webkit using read9p() and friends instead of regular reads?
On Thu, Jul 22, 2010 at 10:59 AM, EBo wrote:
> I'm getting lots of "Numerical result out of range" when running webfs and
> webget in plan9port. It appears to fail on the the first write to
> /mnt/web/ctl.
>
> If I run webfs with "-
Run webfs under strace. It's amazing what you can see.
ron
I'm getting lots of "Numerical result out of range" when running webfs and
webget in plan9port. It appears to fail on the the first write to
/mnt/web/ctl.
If I run webfs with "-s Whpd -m /mnt/web" and run webget, /mnt/web/0/body
contains "/mnt/web/0/body: Numerical result out of range" (and /mn
I am doing some work on webfs - if anyone has any patches
that they have generated locally but not submitted or have not
yet been accepted please send me them (off list).
Thanks
-Steve
> what do you think, does it make sensse to use webfs (or something
> similar) for web servlets (eg. instead of cgi) ?
we're working on a cgifs. fgb is finishing it up now. it'll be on
sources soon. it is pretty cool. everything can be done in rc,
including form handling.
> Hi folks,
>
> what do you think, does it make sensse to use webfs (or something
> similar) for web servlets (eg. instead of cgi) ?
it depends entirely on your application. if it is simple to maintain
all the state you need in the fs, i'm not sure why you'd go to the
bother.
on the other hand,
Hi folks,
what do you think, does it make sensse to use webfs (or something
similar) for web servlets (eg. instead of cgi) ?
cu
--
--
Enrico Weigelt, metux IT service -- http://www.metux.de/
cellphone: +49 174 7066481 emai
18 matches
Mail list logo
