On Sat, Nov 13, 2010 at 12:56 PM, erik quanstrom <quans...@quanstro.net>wrote:
> > In longer terms, I'd also replace mozilla's handling of other > > protocols, eg. ftp, by an webfs implementation. > > > > > > What do you think about this ? > > webfs is client side, not server side. > > - erik > > I must confess, I understood the question more than this comment. Why not use webfs for Mozilla? How much code could be saved by re-using the webfs service?
