On Thu, Jun 23, 2011 at 8:18 AM, dexen deVries wrote:
> On Thursday 23 June 2011 17:09:56 ron minnich wrote:
> > oh no. EFI is much worse than that. It's an operating system written
> > by people who never understood the lessons learned by Unix in 1970.
> > I'm not kidding.
>
> can one run a web b
On Thursday 23 June 2011 17:09:56 ron minnich wrote:
> oh no. EFI is much worse than that. It's an operating system written
> by people who never understood the lessons learned by Unix in 1970.
> I'm not kidding.
can one run a web browser directly on it? ;-)
(only half kidding there)
--
dexen de
> oh no. EFI is much worse than that. It's an operating system written
> by people who never understood the lessons learned by Unix in 1970.
> I'm not kidding.
that's not a surprise. nobody else does. especially the linux guys.
- erik
On Wed, Jun 22, 2011 at 5:40 PM, Lyndon Nerenberg wrote:
> But speaking of annoyed, have you done any DSDT rewrites to get gear going?
> From what I've seen of EFI it seems like it's just an excuse to rewrite all
> the fucked up ACPI tables they (read: intel) got wrong the first time
> around. sig
On Wed Jun 22 21:12:01 EDT 2011, lyn...@orthanc.ca wrote:
> > you may wish to download just the kernel.
>
> I've given up on Parallels. And VMware (where I leapt to after Parallels 5
> stopped working). For half the price of either, Craigslist will spit up
> hardware that will run Plan 9 on bar
you may wish to download just the kernel.
I've given up on Parallels. And VMware (where I leapt to after Parallels 5
stopped working). For half the price of either, Craigslist will spit up
hardware that will run Plan 9 on bare metal.
i've incorporated the patch and rerolled the cd. unfortunately
it's not tested because i don't have any igbe anymore. the change
to the eeprom access might be a problem, but i think just an extra
clock cycle should be okay.
you may wish to download just the kernel.
- erik
On Wed Jun 22 20:41:07 EDT 2011, lyn...@orthanc.ca wrote:
> But speaking of annoyed, have you done any DSDT rewrites to get gear
> going? From what I've seen of EFI it seems like it's just an excuse to
> rewrite all the fucked up ACPI tables they (read: intel) got wrong the
> first time around.
But speaking of annoyed, have you done any DSDT rewrites to get gear
going? From what I've seen of EFI it seems like it's just an excuse to
rewrite all the fucked up ACPI tables they (read: intel) got wrong the
first time around. sigh.
don't worry about it.
I was worried about the mailing list, and not you my son ;-)
On Wed Jun 22 20:31:59 EDT 2011, lyn...@orthanc.ca wrote:
> > --annoyed
>
> At Parallels, not Eric.
don't worry about it.
- erik
--annoyed
At Parallels, not Eric.
Just to add to the misery, I tried a 9atom (from three days ago) install
in Parallels 6.0.12090.660720 (2011-05-26 build date, apparently). It
hangs after lamenting "igbe: unusable PciCLS: 0, using 8 longs."
Screenshot attached, FWIW.
--annoyed<>
13 matches
Mail list logo
