On 7/13/20, David du Colombier <0in...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> Did anybody try to reimplement u9fs in go?
>> If not yet, which 9p go package would you recommend to use?
>> (I don't need any authentication only 9p.)
>
> There is a multitude of 9P implementations in Go.
>
> For example, this one, which
https://github.com/lionkov/go9p
--
9fans: 9fans
Permalink:
https://9fans.topicbox.com/groups/9fans/Tea875067b53dce5f-Mddabe6c730b9fad7557e7a4a
Delivery options: https://9fans.topicbox.com/groups/9fans/subscription
Also of note is droyo's styx library, which I've found useful
personally in creating a 9p message queue, and which a few of us on a
9fans discord server use for additional projects:
https://github.com/droyo/styx
I'm not aware of anyone having created a u9fs equivalent using it, however.
Good luck
> Did anybody try to reimplement u9fs in go?
> If not yet, which 9p go package would you recommend to use?
> (I don't need any authentication only 9p.)
There is a multitude of 9P implementations in Go.
For example, this one, which includes a program to serve
local files as a 9P filesystem:
https
Did anybody try to reimplement u9fs in go?
If not yet, which 9p go package would you recommend to use?
(I don't need any authentication only 9p.)
thanks!
--
9fans: 9fans
Permalink:
https://9fans.topicbox.com/groups/9fans/Tea875067b53dce5f-M7b748986be54c54d1
2015-09-02 6:38 GMT+02:00 :
> > I don't think it is currently maintained, but Plan 9 ships with a copy
> > of it under /sys/src/cmd/unix. I used that as the basis of the OpenBSD
> > port.
>
> I have it on my list of urgent tasks to fix u9fs. The more recent
> copy (details need investigating) fai
> I don't think it is currently maintained, but Plan 9 ships with a copy
> of it under /sys/src/cmd/unix. I used that as the basis of the OpenBSD
> port.
I have it on my list of urgent tasks to fix u9fs. The more recent
copy (details need investigating) fails on NetBSD when encountering
group IDs
> Hi, anybody knows where the u9fs sources are currently maintained?
>
> I have just found https://bitbucket.org/plan9-from-bell-labs/u9fs but it's
> only linked by an old googlecode repo: I was unable to find any official
> link in the bell labs pages.
I don't think it is currently maintained, b
Hi, anybody knows where the u9fs sources are currently maintained?
I have just found https://bitbucket.org/plan9-from-bell-labs/u9fs but it's
only linked by an old googlecode repo: I was unable to find any official
link in the bell labs pages.
Giacomo
> > /sys/src/cmd/unix/u9fs/authp9any.c
> > authp9any.c.orig:369,375 - /n/sources/patch/u9fs-afid/authp9any.c:369,378
> > fprint(2, "p9anyattach: afid %d state %d\n", rx->afid, sp->state);
> > if (sp->state == Established && strcmp(rx->uname, sp->uname) == 0
> > && strcmp(rx->aname, sp->aname) == 0)
> /sys/src/cmd/unix/u9fs/authp9any.c
> authp9any.c.orig:369,375 -
> /n/sources/patch/u9fs-afid/authp9any.c:369,378
> fprint(2, "p9anyattach: afid %d state %d\n", rx->afid,
> sp->state);
> if (sp->state == Established && strcmp(rx->uname, sp->uname) == > 0
U9fs(4) misuses Fcall.afid in its p9any authentication module.
The afid field of Fcall structure is only valid with Tauth or Tattach.
Tread, Twrite, Tclunk should use rx->fid instead. It's been lucky so
far to get the job done because rx->afid survives from previous
Tauth/Tattach. The issue pops
Hello,
I have updated u9fs for OSX.
the new version uses translation table.
therefor it can support not only japanese runes, but also any other runes.
NFD to NFC table of latin runes are included.
I hope the patch is useful for OSX users.
I also updated "trans". the previous version had bugs.
y
Hello,
OSX unicodes for some japanese letters are irregular.
current u9fs fails to handle OSX unicode correctly.
you will find u9fs that fix the problem at http://plan9.aichi-u.ac.jp/netlib/
probably anyone except japanese will not be interested in, though.
Kenji Arisawa
i use u9fs but with ssh and from inetd, never rhosts.
On 29 Apr 2012, at 11:05 PM, Lyndon Nerenberg wrote:
> A quick poll:
>
> Are any of you using rhosts authentication with u9fs, or do you know of
> anyone that actively uses it?
>
>
> Are any of you using rhosts authentication with u9fs, or do you know of
> anyone that actively uses it?
I do.
Lucio.
A quick poll:
Are any of you using rhosts authentication with u9fs, or do you know of
anyone that actively uses it?
I wrote:
When I access to my Mac/OSX PowerBook from Plan 9 terminal (in
hosted VirtualPC),
ls command of Plan 9 terminal does not respond in a special directory:
a mounted directory of remote file server.
but "(in hosted VirtualPC)" is not essential.
Kenji Arisawa
Hello,
I am annoyed by a curious phenomenon.
When I access to my Mac/OSX PowerBook from Plan 9 terminal (in hosted
VirtualPC),
ls command of Plan 9 terminal does not respond in a special directory:
a mounted directory of remote file server.
Of cause my PowerBook responds the directory
19 matches
Mail list logo
