thanks for all the links - this thread is getting useful :)
On Tue Jul 17 16:34:44 EDT 2012, st...@quintile.net wrote:
> > don't forget jeff's pic controllers.
>
> perhaps I have forgotten, perhaps I missed them
>
> link please ?
see http://9fans.net/archive/2012/07/49
http://4e.iwp9.org/papers/levitation.pdf
- erik
> don't forget jeff's pic controllers.
perhaps I have forgotten, perhaps I missed them
link please ?
-Steve
> by the way, are there papers/slides from 6th(2011)? haven't seen them
; hget http://iwp9.org/iwp96e.pdf|page
- erik
Arduino uses C++. I guess it could be a .c file, though.
On Jul 17, 2012 12:14 PM, "hiro" <23h...@gmail.com> wrote:
> why does this have a .cpp file?
>
> On 7/17/12, Eli Cohen wrote:
> > https://github.com/echoline/NinePea too (it needs work)
> > On Jul 17, 2012 11:52 AM, "erik quanstrom"
> wro
On Tue, 17 Jul 2012 15:33:59 EDT erik quanstrom wrote:
> > > What would be possible is to build a general purpose
> > > building block. Something like this:
> > > - provide a tiny thread library
> > > - provide 9p over USB|serial|UDP
> > > - implement a simple 9p server framework & export a serve
On 2012-07-17 21:16 , erik quanstrom wrote:
>> Actually it doesn't have to be 9p. It can be something
>> simpler.
> you should read the iwp9 papers!
>
> - erik
>
by the way, are there papers/slides from 6th(2011)? haven't seen them
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
> > What would be possible is to build a general purpose
> > building block. Something like this:
> > - provide a tiny thread library
> > - provide 9p over USB|serial|UDP
> > - implement a simple 9p server framework & export a server
> > side interface where one can plug in sensor/actuator
> >
On 7/17/12, Bakul Shah wrote:
> On Tue, 17 Jul 2012 17:51:13 BST Ethan Grammatikidis
> wrote:
>> Actually I've toyed with the idea of a "Plan 9 from 8-bit space". It
>> would be a fun challenge, I think, and I'd be interested to find
>> exactly what compromises would be needed. It may even be les
> Actually it doesn't have to be 9p. It can be something
> simpler.
you should read the iwp9 papers!
- erik
why does this have a .cpp file?
On 7/17/12, Eli Cohen wrote:
> https://github.com/echoline/NinePea too (it needs work)
> On Jul 17, 2012 11:52 AM, "erik quanstrom" wrote:
>
>> On Tue Jul 17 14:44:28 EDT 2012, a...@9srv.net wrote:
>>
>> > > you don't want plan 9 on an 8 bit machine.
>> >
>> > Whi
On Tue, 17 Jul 2012 17:51:13 BST Ethan Grammatikidis
wrote:
> Actually I've toyed with the idea of a "Plan 9 from 8-bit space". It
> would be a fun challenge, I think, and I'd be interested to find
> exactly what compromises would be needed. It may even be less of a
> challenge than writing driv
https://github.com/echoline/NinePea too (it needs work)
On Jul 17, 2012 11:52 AM, "erik quanstrom" wrote:
> On Tue Jul 17 14:44:28 EDT 2012, a...@9srv.net wrote:
>
> > > you don't want plan 9 on an 8 bit machine.
> >
> > Which, of course, doesn't say anything about wanting styx/9p
> > on such a m
On Tue Jul 17 14:44:28 EDT 2012, a...@9srv.net wrote:
> > you don't want plan 9 on an 8 bit machine.
>
> Which, of course, doesn't say anything about wanting styx/9p
> on such a machine. Every time we get to this point in this
> (recurring) conversation, I'm compelled to make sure everyone
> has
> you don't want plan 9 on an 8 bit machine.
Which, of course, doesn't say anything about wanting styx/9p
on such a machine. Every time we get to this point in this
(recurring) conversation, I'm compelled to make sure everyone
has seen the excellent Styx on a Brick paper, describing work
to export
On Tue, Jul 17, 2012 at 02:16:00PM -0400, erik quanstrom wrote:
>
> it's an opinion that 8 bits don't have mmus?
> that's taking relativism to a whole new level.
>
your original message didn't contain anything approaching useful content
On Tue Jul 17 13:35:18 EDT 2012, kh...@intma.in wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 17, 2012 at 12:53:05PM -0400, erik quanstrom wrote:
> >
> > you don't want plan 9 on an 8 bit machine.
> >
> > - erik
> >
>
> Thanks for letting him know, erik. Please also explain his other
> hardware opinions, I think he's
You do on the wireless motes, because you have several networks and a file
system.
There isn't a "user mode" of course, but there are applications. ours was a
noise
monitoring system to some international noise-monitoring standard.
On 17 July 2012 18:33, Paul Lalonde wrote:
> A small driver libr
it's an Atmel AVR. we did z[acl] for the ATmega128 in the Berkeley mote,
which is an 8-bit AVR, and I wrote a little 16/32 bit kernel for it.
On 17 July 2012 17:51, Ethan Grammatikidis wrote:
> It's an 8-bit, what are you going to put on it,
On Tue, Jul 17, 2012 at 12:53:05PM -0400, erik quanstrom wrote:
>
> you don't want plan 9 on an 8 bit machine.
>
> - erik
>
Thanks for letting him know, erik. Please also explain his other
hardware opinions, I think he's looking for a keyboard
More to the point, you don't want any OS on an 8 bit machine.
A small driver library, maybe. But really, 8 bit machines today are
just for fun little micro-control projects and you really don't want
an OS in the way.
The first thing I did to make an arduino useful was reclaim the timer
thread tha
> Actually I've toyed with the idea of a "Plan 9 from 8-bit space". It
> would be a fun challenge, I think, and I'd be interested to find
> exactly what compromises would be needed. It may even be less of a
> challenge than writing drivers for the crap peripherals ARM SOCs always
> seem to be burde
On Mon, 16 Jul 2012 09:49:20 -0400
Wes Kussmaul wrote:
> On Mon, 2012-07-16 at 08:44 +, opryy...@gmail.com wrote:
> > Another neat comparison of 44 tiny devices:
> > http://dl.dropbox.com/u/4035896/a320_downloads/SBC_comparison44.pdf
>
> No mention of the $16 Teensy? http://www.pjrc.com/
I
I'd like to share with everyone that I've just purchased one of these:
https://www.olimex.com/dev/imx233-olinuxino-micro.html
I liked how they have all their schematics and layouts are on github and
that the freescale chip would be a bit friendlier than something from
nvidia or broadcom (not to
On Mon, 2012-07-16 at 08:44 +, opryy...@gmail.com wrote:
> Another neat comparison of 44 tiny devices:
> http://dl.dropbox.com/u/4035896/a320_downloads/SBC_comparison44.pdf
No mention of the $16 Teensy? http://www.pjrc.com/
...or the Arduino?
On Mon, Jul 16, 2012 at 08:44:52AM +, opryy...@gmail.com wrote:
> Another neat comparison of 44 tiny devices:
> http://dl.dropbox.com/u/4035896/a320_downloads/SBC_comparison44.pdf
I think this one looks very good too in terms of price/features, advised by some
colleagues:
http://www.fanlesstec
Hi,
I am waiting for my RaspPi to start some cracking, but meanwhile you can
have a look at http://kernelnomicon.org/ which is illustrating the
progress for RPi to boot FreeBSD. It provides useful bunch of info about
booting process that RPi uses - can be a very good starting point.
On 2012-07-16
Another neat comparison of 44 tiny devices:
http://dl.dropbox.com/u/4035896/a320_downloads/SBC_comparison44.pdf
I wonder which one will run Plan9 without much of a hassle. Have to wait
somebody to crack RaspberryPi.
On Sunday, 17 June 2012 18:20:35 UTC+1, (unknown) wrote:
> http://raymii.org/cm
Le 17/06/2012 19:20, arn...@skeeve.com a écrit :
http://raymii.org/cms/p_Small_Linux_PCs_overview
Arnold
Thank you a lot. There are some nice devices I've never heard
about before, including the Cubox.
Nicolas
> do you mind quoting it here?
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MShbP3OpASA&feature=youtu.be&t=49m45s
do you mind quoting it here?
2012/6/17 Nick LaForge :
> I'm still a little hesitant
> about Nvidia, but to avoid further damaging relations with processor
> designers I'll defer to Torvalds' statement on the matter from
> Thursday in Finland.
http://h1ro.dyndns.org/IMG_20120403_003343.jpg
On Sun, Jun 17, 2012 at 11:20 PM, Kurt H Maier wrote:
> On Sun, Jun 17, 2012 at 09:00:00PM +0200, hiro wrote:
>> I have a tegra 2 and it's completely undocumented and only comes with
>> binary display drivers.
>
> Speaking of tegra, what the hell happened with linux4tegra? It was
> announced, del
On Sun, Jun 17, 2012 at 09:00:00PM +0200, hiro wrote:
> I have a tegra 2 and it's completely undocumented and only comes with
> binary display drivers.
Speaking of tegra, what the hell happened with linux4tegra? It was
announced, delayed, released, and then pulled? Is that correct?
I have a tegra 2 and it's completely undocumented and only comes with
binary display drivers.
huh. I guess there was a recent machine with sata and GbE and a
decent cpu/ram (tegra 2/1GB). $200. I'm still a little hesitant
about Nvidia, but to avoid further damaging relations with processor
designers I'll defer to Torvalds' statement on the matter from
Thursday in Finland.
-Nick
Sent fr
http://raymii.org/cms/p_Small_Linux_PCs_overview
Arnold
37 matches
Mail list logo
