On Tue, Apr 01, 2025 at 10:59:06PM +0200, Roberto E. Vargas Caballero wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 01, 2025 at 12:33:47PM -0400, o...@eigenstate.org wrote:
> > Quoth Roman Belenov :
> > > Why not Alpha? Or it's never-released-for-some-reason successor Iota?
> >
> > Too niche, obviously.
>
> I have an alp
On Tue, Apr 1, 2025, 6:24 PM Brian L. Stuart wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 01, 2025 at 10:59:06PM +0200, Roberto E. Vargas Caballero
> wrote:
> > On Tue, Apr 01, 2025 at 12:33:47PM -0400, o...@eigenstate.org wrote:
> > > Quoth Roman Belenov :
> > > > Why not Alpha? Or it's never-released-for-some-reason s
On Tue, Apr 01, 2025 at 12:33:47PM -0400, o...@eigenstate.org wrote:
> Quoth Roman Belenov :
> > Why not Alpha? Or it's never-released-for-some-reason successor Iota?
>
> Too niche, obviously.
I have an alpha computer! No alpha support no hackathon!!
-
Yes, Alpha was not a good name; to fix the issue, they had plan B (Beta), plan
3 (Gamma) to make it even better, and eventually Iota was supposed to be the
last word in naming and CPU design, but something went wrong...
--
9fans: 9fans
Permalink:
https://9
Not sure about Iota, but Alpha as an architecture name is a likely
source of confusion that would be nice to avoid.
How easy to mistake an alpha release as a release for Alpha? Not to
metion alpha releases for Alpha...
It makes me wonder what the conversations would be like if the company
A
Quoth Roman Belenov :
> Why not Alpha? Or it's never-released-for-some-reason successor Iota?
Too niche, obviously.
--
9fans: 9fans
Permalink:
https://9fans.topicbox.com/groups/9fans/T82bf787acede8ea1-Meb9cd5c8c415420c60494845
Delivery options: https://9f
Why not Alpha? Or it's never-released-for-some-reason successor Iota?
--
9fans: 9fans
Permalink:
https://9fans.topicbox.com/groups/9fans/T82bf787acede8ea1-M4e718e07c68a925214363682
Delivery options: https://9fans.topicbox.com/groups/9fans/subscription
