Not sure about Iota, but Alpha as an architecture name is a likely
source of confusion that would be nice to avoid.
How easy to mistake an alpha release as a release for Alpha? Not to
metion alpha releases for Alpha...
It makes me wonder what the conversations would be like if the company
Alpha had released their earlier database product (Alpha Four) for the
Alpha architecture... an alpha of Alpha Four for Alpha?
On 4/1/25 11:35, Roman Belenov wrote:
Why not Alpha? Or it's never-released-for-some-reason successor Iota?
*9fans <https://9fans.topicbox.com/latest>* / 9fans / see discussions
<https://9fans.topicbox.com/groups/9fans> + participants
<https://9fans.topicbox.com/groups/9fans/members> + delivery options
<https://9fans.topicbox.com/groups/9fans/subscription> Permalink
<https://9fans.topicbox.com/groups/9fans/T82bf787acede8ea1-M4e718e07c68a925214363682>
------------------------------------------
9fans: 9fans
Permalink:
https://9fans.topicbox.com/groups/9fans/T82bf787acede8ea1-M67c8076ccaf0d0800b5788c7
Delivery options: https://9fans.topicbox.com/groups/9fans/subscription
