> I've attached image of the result of the command. I hope that soon I will be
> able to
> attach it in plain text format :). I'm afraid that my Ethernet card is not
> recognised too.
> Can you recommend any PCI Ethernet card that is known to be working under
> Plan 9?
anything intel gigabit+p
> As an aside, why don't we have an architecture like this? (From your
> comment, I'm assuming we don't.)
> I'm sure there are valid technical reasons, but to an uneducated bystander
> like myself, this seems to violate DRY.
because at least in the case of the linux disk layers, it makes the code
On Mar 17, 2014 3:34 PM, "erik quanstrom" wrote:
> linux sata drivers can be harder to clone since so much of the work is
done
> in a series of generic layers. and they can take a while to digest.
As an aside, why don't we have an architecture like this? (From your
comment, I'm assuming we don't.
> Ok, now it's working. I'm not sure why it doesn't work last time(maybe I
> was doing something wrong). But now I have several more questions about
> this image:
easy for little errors to creep in when one is unsure of the details.
(as i'm experiencing right now with something else.)
> At first
> > because when I boot
> > the system from the image you have given me I cannot save any file. Does
> > plan9 support saving the state of live session?
>
> that's a bit surprising.
>
> try
> echo >/lib/emptyfile
>
> does that yield an error?
Ok, now it's working. I'm not sure why it doesn
> Do you think that there is a point in trying to solve it? Where should I
> start when I would like to fix this issue. Is it easy or rather hard
> task? How does the develop process looks like when doing such things?
i think this is a hard question to answer. on the one hand, i don't want
to be
> > 0.6.0 disk 01.01.8a 10de/03ec 0 4:ffa1 16 0.8.0 disk 01.01.85
> > 10de/03f6 5 0:d401 16 1:d081 16 2:d001 16 3:cc01 16
> > 4:c881 16 5:deefc000 4096
> >
> > But I have no idea what does it means. I hope you will know.
>
> i do. this is an nvidia sata part, which is no
On Tue Mar 18 10:33:08 EDT 2014, cinap_len...@felloff.net wrote:
> yep. sorry, wrong assumptions on my side. i only
> have reports of MCP51 working, but not MCP61.
i believe both work since iirc, i had a mcp61 motherboard,
and used the ide interface.
iirc, nvidia is not like intel. the ide inter
yep. sorry, wrong assumptions on my side. i only
have reports of MCP51 working, but not MCP61.
--
cinap
On Tue Mar 18 06:53:05 EDT 2014, cinap_len...@felloff.net wrote:
> this device is a ata controller that might just work with
> plan9's generic ata driver (given you add the pci id).
> i checked 9front sdide.c which has the pci id for the controller:
>
> case (0x03ec<<16)|0x10DE:
this device is a ata controller that might just work with
plan9's generic ata driver (given you add the pci id).
i checked 9front sdide.c which has the pci id for the controller:
case (0x03ec<<16)|0x10DE: /* nVidia nForce 61 MCP SATA */
we add these pci id's as we encounter
> 0.6.0 disk 01.01.8a 10de/03ec 0 4:ffa1 16 0.8.0 disk 01.01.85
> 10de/03f6 5 0:d401 16 1:d081 16 2:d001 16 3:cc01 16
> 4:c881 16 5:deefc000 4096
>
> But I have no idea what does it means. I hope you will know.
i do. this is an nvidia sata part, which is not currently su
On Sun, Mar 16, 2014 at 12:14:17PM -0400, erik quanstrom wrote:
> On Sun Mar 16 12:06:39 EDT 2014, szymon.olewnic...@rid.pl wrote:
>
> > Hi,
> > today I've tried to boot plan9 on my computer. Sadly withou a success.
> > I'm attaching screenshot of my computer after typing ctrl+t ctrl+t p.
> >
> >
On Sun Mar 16 12:06:39 EDT 2014, szymon.olewnic...@rid.pl wrote:
> Hi,
> today I've tried to boot plan9 on my computer. Sadly withou a success.
> I'm attaching screenshot of my computer after typing ctrl+t ctrl+t p.
>
> Do you know is going on? How can I fix it? I woud like to run Plan 9
> before
14 matches
Mail list logo
