Re: [9fans] Encrypting file systems

2011-03-30 Thread Mechiel Lukkien
On Tue, Mar 29, 2011 at 02:42:06PM +, smi...@zenzebra.mv.com wrote: > Hello, > > Back in 2009, someone on this list posted about encrypting /usr on a > Plan 9 laptop they had. Does anyone know how to encrypt a file system > on Plan 9? (I'm talking about encrypting the storage on disk, not ju

Re: [9fans] streams

2011-02-21 Thread Mechiel Lukkien
On Mon, Feb 21, 2011 at 07:53:30PM +0100, Nemo wrote: > i reply myself; i think they use sst to mix multimedia streams, and > in that case a lost packet in one stream (say text) would > delay other streams (say audio) that do not need to be delayed if > you use sst. > > But otherwise I still thin

Re: [9fans] sheevaplug port available

2010-03-08 Thread Mechiel Lukkien
On Wed, Feb 24, 2010 at 03:22:25PM -0500, ge...@plan9.bell-labs.com wrote: > usb has advanced a little; we can see usb devices now but attempts to > read or write them hang. I don't know of progress on flash access or > anything else. in the inferno port i've been able to access the nand flash:

Re: [9fans] ideas for helpful system io functions

2009-12-07 Thread Mechiel Lukkien
On Sat, Dec 05, 2009 at 08:24:45AM -1000, Tim Newsham wrote: > ps. if you wanted to hide this ugliness of passing a buffer and > fd to a child process instead of just passing an fd, you could > still solve it in userland without a syscall. Write a library > that does buffered IO. Include unget()

Re: [9fans] IWP9 hack session

2009-10-07 Thread Mechiel Lukkien
On Tue, Oct 06, 2009 at 12:50:18PM -0700, ron minnich wrote: > I'd like to have a hack session the wed. morning before IWP9. > > What I'd like to propose is a sheeva plugfest. People commit to bringing a > plug > and we get them set up to run Plan 9. > > Any interest? inferno might be a good ta

Re: [9fans] HP: Printing with the Illiterate

2009-08-17 Thread Mechiel Lukkien
On Mon, Aug 17, 2009 at 01:50:42AM -0600, Daniel Lyons wrote: > > On Aug 14, 2009, at 8:12 PM, Akshat Kumar wrote: > > >Suggestions (model, company, etc.) welcome. > >Although, this thing can do photoscanning, copying, > >and faxing. I make great use of the former two, > >along with printing (of

Re: [9fans] i/o on a hangup channel asymmetry

2009-07-19 Thread Mechiel Lukkien
On Sun, Jul 19, 2009 at 10:30:41AM +0100, Charles Forsyth wrote: > >perhaps i've been asleep at the swtch, but i don't recall seing writes > >on closed channels terminate programs with a note. > > sys: write on closed pipe > > mainly to kill off a pipeline when the thing at the end has finished.

Re: [9fans] channels across machines

2009-07-18 Thread Mechiel Lukkien
On Sat, Jul 18, 2009 at 06:25:19AM -0400, erik quanstrom wrote: > i think the general idea is that if you want to do this between > arbitrary machines, you provide a 9p interface. you can think > of 9p as a channel with a predefined set of messages. acme > does this. kernel devices do this. >

Re: [9fans] VMs, etc. (was: Re: security questions)

2009-04-18 Thread Mechiel Lukkien
On Sat, Apr 18, 2009 at 10:54:34AM -0400, erik quanstrom wrote: > as an old example, i think that the lab's use of worm storage > for the main file server was incredibly insightful. > > what could we do today, but don't quite dare? stop writing all programs in C, and start writing them in a highe

Re: [9fans] VMs, etc. (was: Re: security questions)

2009-04-17 Thread Mechiel Lukkien
On Fri, Apr 17, 2009 at 04:25:40PM -0500, blstu...@bellsouth.net wrote: > Again, that's not to say that there aren't other valid motivators > for some centralized functionality. It's just that in my opinion, > we're at the point were if it's raw cycles we need, we'll have > to be looking at a larg

Re: [9fans] security questions

2009-04-17 Thread Mechiel Lukkien
On Fri, Apr 17, 2009 at 11:29:47AM +0100, Steve Simon wrote: > I am interested in the idea of adding some kind of resource limits > to plan9. If they existsed I would probably open it up to external > users, however different things would worry me: > > CPU use > Implement the Fair share scheduler

Re: [9fans] exportfs security question

2009-04-10 Thread Mechiel Lukkien
On Fri, Apr 10, 2009 at 07:48:54AM -0400, erik quanstrom wrote: > > We haven't brought up SSL yet, so Eve can read our exchanged random > > numbers... now these values get shoved into SHA-1 (along with the 56 bits of > > entropy from Kn derived from p9any authentication) before being used to make >

Re: [9fans] extensions of "interest"

2009-04-09 Thread Mechiel Lukkien
On Thu, Apr 09, 2009 at 03:22:48PM -0400, erik quanstrom wrote: > > > Already part of HTTP > > > > > > Accept: application/msword; q=1, application/pdf; > > > q=0.5,application/x-troff-ms; q=0.3 > > > > > > q is the level of preference, you'll get word docs first > > > > > > > > > > Wow. Could it

Re: [9fans] plan9port openbsd 4.4

2009-01-29 Thread Mechiel Lukkien
On Mon, Jan 26, 2009 at 01:01:55PM -0500, Anthony Sorace wrote: > if you want to work on it some, this message talks about getting > inferno working on OpenBSD using the rthreads library (the pending > replacement for the userland threads russ talked about): > > http://www.xs4all.nl/~mechiel/infer

Re: [9fans] Do we have a catalog of 9P servers?

2008-11-08 Thread Mechiel Lukkien
On Sat, Nov 08, 2008 at 02:16:39PM -0800, Roman Shaposhnik wrote: > On Nov 8, 2008, at 11:15 AM, John Barham wrote: > >>>It seems that MS is pushing webdav hard. > >> > >>that's what's needed when heavy things run out of fuel. > > > >Even as a potential substitute for ftp webdav is a farce. Speaki