On Mon, Feb 21, 2011 at 07:53:30PM +0100, Nemo wrote:
> i reply myself; i think they use sst to mix multimedia streams, and
> in that case a lost packet in one stream (say text) would
> delay other streams (say audio) that do not need to be delayed if
> you use sst.
>
> But otherwise I still think that muxing a tcp stream might provide
> something similar (without some of sst ffeatures, i admit) and a lot
> easier to implement. I'll write a toy to see if this is wrong.
fwiw, just put this code i had in my homedir online:
http://www.ueber.net/code/r/fdmux
the readme has info & warnings, appl/lib/fdmux.b starts with a description
of the protocol.
yes, sst can (and does seem to) improve on many levels.
