for new stuff: i'd look out for cheap Intel N100 based boards on aliexpress.
i have never noted the power supply, so no clue if there's anything usb-c
powered, sorry.
for used stuff: old thinkcentre tiny PCs. but that's definitely not usb-c
powered, sorry.
;)
On Sat, Feb 8, 2025 at 2:48 AM ron mi
I'm looking for something as defined in the subject. Has to run Plan 9 of
course. No disk needed, will netboot.
refurb is fine. If anyone has gotten such a thing recently, please lmk.
I may just see if there's cheapo thinkpads that fill the bill, but I'd
prefer something tiny.
--
The time is nearing; If you still have papers to submit,
this is your reminder to get them in.
--
9fans: 9fans
Permalink:
https://9fans.topicbox.com/groups/9fans/T91803955a710ee27-M0073e0b4ac79e535ddd689ff
Delivery options: https://9fans.topicbox.com/group
yeah, I finally did get it to work. It works more like a merge than the
rebase I'm used to, but it works just fine.
On Fri, Feb 7, 2025 at 1:55 PM Jacob Moody wrote:
> On 2/7/25 15:11, ron minnich wrote:
> > I did try this
> > git/branch ron_nix
> > git/rebase remotes/front/front
> >
> > it ende
On 2/7/25 15:11, ron minnich wrote:
> I did try this
> git/branch ron_nix
> git/rebase remotes/front/front
>
> it ended very badly.
Your understanding of remote/* is incorrect, run git/branch -a which will give
you all of
the remote/* branches as followed by your repo. When you git/pull -f, tho
I did try this
git/branch ron_nix
git/rebase remotes/front/front
it ended very badly.
On Fri, Feb 7, 2025 at 1:03 PM ron minnich wrote:
> I think you need to rephrase your commands in terms of 9front git. That's
> my question. I have no question about how to do it with standard git.
>
> re Jac
I think you need to rephrase your commands in terms of 9front git. That's
my question. I have no question about how to do it with standard git.
re Jacob's example:
git/rebase remotes/origin/$upstreambranch
I'm still a bit lost on just where the commits end up. upstreambranch?
Looking at the sourc
In most repos, I just do something like:
git checkout master
git fetch --all
git pull <-- Now I'm up to date with origin, presumably my fork on
github, etc
git merge upstream/master <-- Now I'm up to date with the project, assuming
I added it as upstream
git checkout x<-- the lo
On 2/7/25 10:23, ron minnich wrote:
> what I'm used to
> I'm on branch x
> git pull --rebase origin main
>
> with 9front git
> I'm on branch x
> git/pull -f origin
> git/rebase origin/heads/front
>
> That does not look right. Reading /bin/git/rebase, I almost think I want to do
> git/branch heads
I checked in execac system call support this morning. not tested.
I am bringing this back to life because I hate to see it lost. 9front is a
good vehicle and, once it is in, keeping it alive as a fork or branch is
doable.
There are several ideas in here that may be worth keeping.
The idea of "cor
what I'm used to
I'm on branch x
git pull --rebase origin main
with 9front git
I'm on branch x
git/pull -f origin
git/rebase origin/heads/front
That does not look right. Reading /bin/git/rebase, I almost think I want to
do
git/branch heads/front
git/rebase heads/x
but I'm a bit uncertain. I'm no
I never really understood what this was supposed to be. seems like an
interesting idea. very asymmetric multi-processor stuff.
what do you all think we should do?
On Thu, Feb 6, 2025, 10:34 PM Cody Holliday wrote:
> Hey Ron,
>
> Looks like you didn't check in the implementation of execac.
>
> H
12 matches
Mail list logo
