yeah, I finally did get it to work. It works more like a merge than the
rebase I'm used to, but it works just fine.

On Fri, Feb 7, 2025 at 1:55 PM Jacob Moody <mo...@posixcafe.org> wrote:

> On 2/7/25 15:11, ron minnich wrote:
> > I did try this
> > git/branch ron_nix
> > git/rebase remotes/front/front
> >
> > it ended very badly.
> 
> 
> Your understanding of remote/* is incorrect, run git/branch -a which will
> give you all of
> the remote/* branches as followed by your repo. When you git/pull -f,
> those are what get updated,
> if you omit the -f then it _also_ updates your "local" branch.
> 
> If the remote default branch you're pulling from is named "front" then the
> remote branch is likely remotes/origin/front.
> The convention is remotes/$remotename/$remotebranch.
> 
> Again I don't use our rebase, it's a thin wrapper on top of exporting and
> importing which I tend to do myself I would suggest
> to start without it to get an understanding of how this stuff works.
> 
> Thanks,
> moody
> 

------------------------------------------
9fans: 9fans
Permalink: 
https://9fans.topicbox.com/groups/9fans/T9075ee3b04492dd0-Mb0a594eccf9b4c5411d05359
Delivery options: https://9fans.topicbox.com/groups/9fans/subscription

Reply via email to