you can use mercurial on plan 9 with python installed, not hard to
understand
Well, colour me confused. I can make no sense of this thread. Would that Boyd
were here to explain it.
> On Oct 3, 2015, at 5:48 pm, erik quanstrom wrote:
>
> did you fix the SSL interface in python, too?
>
> - erik
> On Oct 2, 2015 9:37 PM, Nick Owens wrote:
> 9front now supports tls 1.2 i
did you fix the SSL interface in python, too?
- erik
On Oct 2, 2015 9:37 PM, Nick Owens wrote:9front now supports tls 1.2 in libsec/devtls. Mercurial can make use of it through webfs.
On Oct 2, 2015 7:35 PM, "erik quanstrom" wrote:On Fri Oct 2 18:46:06 PDT 2015, khm@sc
9front now supports tls 1.2 in libsec/devtls. Mercurial can make use of it
through webfs.
On Oct 2, 2015 7:35 PM, "erik quanstrom" wrote:
> On Fri Oct 2 18:46:06 PDT 2015, k...@sciops.net wrote:
> > On Fri, Oct 02, 2015 at 11:56:47PM +0200, a.regenf...@gmx.de wrote:
> > > >Mercurial works.
> > >
On Wed Sep 30 03:03:36 PDT 2015, brantleyco...@me.com wrote:
> How can it be a secret 'society' if there's just one member for each secret
> society?
>
> Sent from my iPad
>
> > On Sep 29, 2015, at 11:11 PM, erik quanstrom wrote:
> >
> >> On Tue Sep 29 12:45:25 PDT 2015, k...@sciops.net wrote:
On Fri Oct 2 18:46:06 PDT 2015, k...@sciops.net wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 02, 2015 at 11:56:47PM +0200, a.regenf...@gmx.de wrote:
> > >Mercurial works.
> > If you have got an installed python.
>
> that's pretty much universally the case for mercurial, yes.
well, there are some problems with ssl.
- e
On Fri, Oct 02, 2015 at 11:56:47PM +0200, a.regenf...@gmx.de wrote:
> >Mercurial works.
> If you have got an installed python.
that's pretty much universally the case for mercurial, yes.
khm
>Mercurial works.
If you have got an installed python.
adrian
>CVS works adequately.
Thanks a lot.
adrian
In a previous job I put in some quite serious effort to
port SVN to APE, but it is dependent on... well pretty
much everything. I never managed to even get it to compile,
and lost the will to live.
My new employer uses svn but is about to migrate to git so I would
be interested in a port, I might
Jeff Sickel wrote:
|> On Sep 30, 2015, at 2:59 AM, Charles Forsyth rs...@gmail.com> wrote:
|>
|> Here's a small but representative example.
|
|That’s just an example of a C file. The joy of Git is the\
| rest of the requirements to actually use it:
|
|- bash
Isn't a POSIX shell enough
> having something similar to git or mercurial (or even svn/cvs...) would be
> nice.
CVS works adequately. It's on sources and needs some minute fixes to
get the permissions exactly right: I kept getting files created with
exactly NO permission bits - my last disk failure got rid of my poor
effo
Mercurial works.
--
Aram Hăvărneanu
>> Is the git protocol really so huge that a native implementation
>> wouldn't be feasible?
>The git protocol and file format is very simple. I'm sure it's easier
>to write something from scratch than port git.
>Aram Hăvărneanu
Is there a version control system that can be installed on Plan 9 wit
Here's git "rewritten" in Javascript:
http://gitlet.maryrosecook.com/
-joe
On Fri, Oct 2, 2015 at 4:57 AM, Aram Hăvărneanu wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 2, 2015 at 10:32 AM, hiro <23h...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > Is the git protocol really so huge that a native implementation
> > wouldn't be feasible?
>
>
On Fri, Oct 2, 2015 at 10:32 AM, hiro <23h...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Is the git protocol really so huge that a native implementation
> wouldn't be feasible?
The git protocol and file format is very simple. I'm sure it's easier
to write something from scratch than port git.
--
Aram Hăvărneanu
Is the git protocol really so huge that a native implementation
wouldn't be feasible?
17 matches
Mail list logo