Re: [9fans] runebase breaking libs build

2015-01-18 Thread David du Colombier
> I upgraded via pull, then `{cd /sys/src/; mk objtype='amd64' install}; > which broke at libc. If the issue is the compilers not being built > first, maybe it could be documented on the wiki that they need to be > built first, otherwise odd errors would occur during a world-build. Bell Labs doesn

Re: [9fans] runebase breaking libs build

2015-01-18 Thread erik quanstrom
On Sun Jan 18 21:36:26 PST 2015, don.bai...@gmail.com wrote: > This will be the last email I send regarding this issue as I have no > interest in getting into a long drawn-out 9fans-style discussion. > > I upgraded via pull, then `{cd /sys/src/; mk objtype='amd64' install}; > which broke at libc.

Re: [9fans] runebase breaking libs build

2015-01-18 Thread Bakul Shah
On Sun, 18 Jan 2015 22:09:02 MST Don Bailey wrote: > So this issue is clearly documented somewhere that people can catch up > quickly? >From an old message by David du Colombier: 1. remove runebase from /sys/src/libc/port/mkfile 2. cd /sys/src/libc && mk install && mk clean 3. for(i in /sys/src

Re: [9fans] runebase breaking libs build

2015-01-18 Thread Don Bailey
This will be the last email I send regarding this issue as I have no interest in getting into a long drawn-out 9fans-style discussion. I upgraded via pull, then `{cd /sys/src/; mk objtype='amd64' install}; which broke at libc. If the issue is the compilers not being built first, maybe it could be

Re: [9fans] runebase breaking libs build

2015-01-18 Thread erik quanstrom
On Sun Jan 18 21:05:02 PST 2015, don.bai...@gmail.com wrote: > So this issue is clearly documented somewhere that people can catch up > quickly? > > > > > On Jan 18, 2015, at 9:14 PM, erik quanstrom wrote: > > > >> On Sun Jan 18 20:10:38 PST 2015, don.bai...@gmail.com wrote: > >> The build sc

Re: [9fans] runebase breaking libs build

2015-01-18 Thread Don Bailey
So this issue is clearly documented somewhere that people can catch up quickly? > On Jan 18, 2015, at 9:14 PM, erik quanstrom wrote: > >> On Sun Jan 18 20:10:38 PST 2015, don.bai...@gmail.com wrote: >> The build scripts should probably address this so people that haven't >> updated in a while

Re: [9fans] runebase breaking libs build

2015-01-18 Thread erik quanstrom
On Sun Jan 18 20:10:38 PST 2015, don.bai...@gmail.com wrote: > The build scripts should probably address this so people that haven't updated > in a while aren't spinning wheels. > maybe, but libc was changed in 2013, so, even gentoo doesn't handle this case. - erik

Re: [9fans] runebase breaking libs build

2015-01-18 Thread Don Bailey
The build scripts should probably address this so people that haven't updated in a while aren't spinning wheels. Thanks. > On Jan 18, 2015, at 9:01 PM, erik quanstrom wrote: > >> On Sun Jan 18 15:19:46 PST 2015, don.bai...@gmail.com wrote: >> >> Hi All, >> >> Looks like a change in libc/p

Re: [9fans] runebase breaking libs build

2015-01-18 Thread erik quanstrom
On Sun Jan 18 15:19:46 PST 2015, don.bai...@gmail.com wrote: > Hi All, > > Looks like a change in libc/port/runebase.c is breaking builds. Does anyone > have a quick fix? Looks like the issue isn't specific to a particular > compiler, but illegal runes in the runebase.c file. > > runebase.c:1255

[9fans] runebase breaking libs build

2015-01-18 Thread Don Bailey
Hi All, Looks like a change in libc/port/runebase.c is breaking builds. Does anyone have a quick fix? Looks like the issue isn't specific to a particular compiler, but illegal runes in the runebase.c file. runebase.c:1255 illegal rune in string ... Thanks, D