thanks; i should have checked that. running it on the fossil+venti server
brings it down a bit. still, it's not stellar.
bootes% go test
PASS
ok cmd/pack 81.480s
bootes% go test
PASS
ok cmd/pack 79.719s
On Sun, May 4, 2014 at 7:51 PM, Anthony Martin wrote:
> Skip Tavakkolian once said:
>
that means windows is working as expected :)
On Sun, May 4, 2014 at 10:34 PM, wrote:
>
> PS. I played around with Windows go, and got
> much frustrated.☺
>
>
>
> I'm checking how I can incorporate your nusb codes
> into my 'sources' conservative version usb codes.
> Of course, it's should be my personal hiden version.☺
I found it unneccessary.
The 'sources' usb/disk recognizes partitions already.
However, after I applied 9front's kernel codes (not inclu
> Your numbers don't look entirely abnormal. That test issues
> over a million small writes. (Although it really should be
> using bufio).
Are you suggesting we ought to change pack? I don't mind doing it if
it's likely to be accepted by the developers. On NetBSD and my slow
Plan 9 network, ther
Skip Tavakkolian once said:
> is anyone else seeing similar results for cmd/pack?
>
> % go test
> PASS
> ok cmd/pack 172.505s
>
> this is on an atom (d525 @ 1.8ghz, 4gb). same test on an arm (quad core a9
> @ 1.7ghz, 2gb, linux 3.8) takes much less time:
>
> % go test
> PASS
> ok cmd/pac
is anyone else seeing similar results for cmd/pack?
% go test
PASS
ok cmd/pack 172.505s
this is on an atom (d525 @ 1.8ghz, 4gb). same test on an arm (quad core a9
@ 1.7ghz, 2gb, linux 3.8) takes much less time:
% go test
PASS
ok cmd/pack20.872s
On Sun May 4 18:01:22 EDT 2014, yshu...@lynxline.com wrote:
>
> Just idea, but seriously, why cannot do something like this:
>
> # cat /prog/new > $id
> # cat /dis/ls.dis > /prog/$id/dis
> # echo "/" > /prog/$id/cwd
> # echo «Running» > /prog/$id/status
>
> Not to do it which echo/cat, but to
Just idea, but seriously, why cannot do something like this:
# cat /prog/new > $id
# cat /dis/ls.dis > /prog/$id/dis
# echo "/" > /prog/$id/cwd
# echo «Running» > /prog/$id/status
Not to do it which echo/cat, but to have remote access to /prog/new
> Despite what one might think at first, writing documentation is not
> easier than writing code, and is, IMHO, harder. To write good manual
> pages---the Bell Labs man pages are simply great and from reading the
i agree with your points, but i think there are two additional facts to
consider.
1
> > there are lots of small ways to improve things, too. i'd be happy
> > to talk about that on or off list. one thing that immediately springs
> > to mind is additions to charles' kernel man pages.
>
> The list is not very busy and, I hate to admit, somewhat remote from
> Bell Labs. As a resul
On Sun, May 04, 2014 at 07:12:10AM +0200, lu...@proxima.alt.za wrote:
>
> Personally, kernel pages would be a god-send
Despite what one might think at first, writing documentation is not
easier than writing code, and is, IMHO, harder. To write good manual
pages---the Bell Labs man pages are simpl
11 matches
Mail list logo
