Hi,
I'm using unvac to try to extract some vac archives I made in the fall
of 2008. I'm running into a pair of problems.
First, unvac is outputting directories with the write bit off. This
causes it to fail pretty early, as it can't write files to the
newly-extracted directories. Is this expected
pipefrom is too late to rewrite outgoing addresses,
because marshal has already written the To:
line with the local address. Your post says
To: 9f...@steponnopets.net
You can create /mail/box/$user/names
to get aliases that won't go out.
http://9fans.net/archive/2004/01/530
http://9fans.net/a
qed allowed naming of regular expressions using `e' and their recursive
invocation
using \E, with results suggested earlier.
http://cm.bell-labs.com/cm/cs/who/dmr/qedman.html
http://cm.bell-labs.com/cm/cs/who/dmr/qedman.pdf
``It should be noted that the ability to define regular expressions recu
On Thu Aug 20 19:42:04 EDT 2009, iru.mu...@gmail.com wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 20, 2009 at 6:34 PM, Venkatesh Srinivas wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > Do any of you still use dump9660? Any recent experiences or stuff I
> > should watch out for using it?
> >
>
> mk9660(8) is the main user, but i don't think she
> Here's an example. Let's make the syntax extra pukey: @#, where # is
> 1-9, defines a `named procedure', which is the same thing as putting
> something in braces in Sam.
>
> x/.*\n/ @1{ ( @1 ) | @1 ( @1 ) ( ) | }
>
x/re/ repeatedly sets . with matches until the input
is exhausted. so i don't
On Thu Aug 20 20:53:27 EDT 2009, maht-9f...@maht0x0r.net wrote:
> All being well this is a mail routed by my pipefrom
>
> /n/sources/contrib/maht/rc/pipefrom
>
> It has seen the outgoing address of "9fans" and changed it to
> "9fans@9fans.net"
> It has seen the outgoing address of "9fans@9fans.
All being well this is a mail routed by my pipefrom
/n/sources/contrib/maht/rc/pipefrom
It has seen the outgoing address of "9fans" and changed it to "9fans@9fans.net"
It has seen the outgoing address of "9fans@9fans.net" and set upasname to be
"maht-9f...@maht0x0r.net"
On Thu, Aug 20, 2009 at 5:26 PM, erik quanstrom wrote:
>> No, I know you can apply them `recursively', I mean something more
>> like an expression in a CFG or yacc.
>>
>> >
>> > can you outline somehow what you're thinking of?
>>
>> Basically, if you could take a bracketed expression in sam and the
On Thu, Aug 20, 2009 at 6:34 PM, Venkatesh Srinivas wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Do any of you still use dump9660? Any recent experiences or stuff I
> should watch out for using it?
>
mk9660(8) is the main user, but i don't think she reads the list.
iru
Hi,
Do any of you still use dump9660? Any recent experiences or stuff I
should watch out for using it?
Thanks,
-- vs
> No, I know you can apply them `recursively', I mean something more
> like an expression in a CFG or yacc.
>
> >
> > can you outline somehow what you're thinking of?
>
> Basically, if you could take a bracketed expression in sam and then
> name it, and then call it recursively.
>
> All the prob
On Thu, Aug 20, 2009 at 4:39 PM, erik quanstrom wrote:
>> > i'm sure i've done them. this is a lame example, since i can't remember
>> > where i've used these techniques off the top of my head
>> >
>> > ,x:.*: g/#pragma/ x:[^ ]+[ ]: g/print/p
>>
>> How is this recursive?
>
> in the sense that
> > i'm sure i've done them. this is a lame example, since i can't remember
> > where i've used these techniques off the top of my head
> >
> > ,x:.*: g/#pragma/ x:[^ ]+[ ]: g/print/p
>
> How is this recursive?
in the sense that 'x' is recursively applied to the output of 'x'.
i have no ide
On Thu, Aug 20, 2009 at 3:53 PM, erik quanstrom wrote:
> On Thu Aug 20 13:54:35 EDT 2009, jrm8...@gmail.com wrote:
>> Has anyone given thought to recursive structural regular expressions?
>
> i'm sure i've done them. this is a lame example, since i can't remember
> where i've used these techniques
On Thu Aug 20 13:54:35 EDT 2009, jrm8...@gmail.com wrote:
> Has anyone given thought to recursive structural regular expressions?
i'm sure i've done them. this is a lame example, since i can't remember
where i've used these techniques off the top of my head
,x:.*: g/#pragma/ x:[^ ]+[ ]: g/p
>
> http://fxr.watson.org/fxr/source/pc/devether.c?v=PLAN9#L202
>
you may wish to give "standard" (at least to 9fans) links
to code, e.g:
/sys/src/9/pc/devether.c:202
you would probablly benefit from removing the print statements.
they're potentially going to make the problem much wors
I was just actually about to post about this. I have yet to find a
fix; however, it seems its after the multiplex code and can be found
here
http://fxr.watson.org/fxr/source/pc/devether.c?v=PLAN9#L202
I am not running venti; I am only running fossil. I don't think that
is related in light of t
Hello 9fans,
A few things:
1) I'm going to be installing and finishing up the Plan9 setup I have
at plan9.union.edu or plan9.cs.union.edu; I have not decided where I
would like to put it yet. I'll be doing all of my senior projects on
Plan9 so that I can further my understanding of the system and
Has anyone given thought to recursive structural regular expressions?
I didn't see a way to do recursion from reading the paper and
experimenting.
The reason for recursion would be that instead of having hopped-up
regexes, we'd now have context-free expressions. Yacc needing tokens
makes doing CF
On Wed, Aug 19, 2009 at 12:27 PM, Charles Forsyth wrote:
> i use html, then any browser will do, even ie6 for most things.
> i use an rc script and awk to take an outline format such as
> - burble
> - more burble
> - even more burble
> with some other convention
> what problem are you trying to solve?
>
> the limit would check only that the right number of
> argument bytes are consumed, but not that they are
> interpreted correctly. print("%s %d", 1, "hello") would
> still crash, as would print("%s", 1, "hello").
>
> #pragma varargck is more precise and
I recently came across this, a tool which
can dump some PCI bus info from windows. This may be
of use to people trying to put plan9 on systems that
are already installed with windows.
perhaps this is old news and evryone knows about it,
but I didn't.
http://support.microsoft.com/kb/311272
exampl
On Thu, Aug 20, 2009 at 6:56 AM, erik quanstrom wrote:
> and i wondered why kenc doesn't add an argument
> count before the first vararg. (bwc pointed out
> that the address following the last vararg would be
> more useful.) va_* could be updated to deal with
> the silent extra and abort on acces
as i was drifting off to sleep the other night,
i was wondering about varargs. (clearly, it's
time for a vacation.)
and i wondered why kenc doesn't add an argument
count before the first vararg. (bwc pointed out
that the address following the last vararg would be
more useful.) va_* could be upd
I tried a recent distribution image (Aug15). The live CD worked with
my external harddrive, after plugging it in i issued 'usbfat:', and i
was able to read and write files on it. When I installed it, 'usbfat:'
said that there are no usb disks. usbd was running (5 threads), I will
try ls '#u' when i
25 matches
Mail list logo
