there is also this...
http://www.magma.com.ni/moin/Plan9Tutorial
On Thu, Jul 23, 2009 at 12:36 AM, Corey wrote:
>
> Thanks for the comments everyone.
>
>
> Once I got to a point where I had a cpu/auth server kindof working, and had
> become slightly more comfortable with the bare rudimentary ba
Hi,
I noticed that p9p has threadpin() and threadunpin() in its thread
library... they claim to make the current thread the only one runnable
in this proc. I'm failing to see the purpose of these... a thread is
not subject to preemptive scheduling, it can achieve the same effect
by not calling yie
Thanks for the comments everyone.
Once I got to a point where I had a cpu/auth server kindof working, and had
become slightly more comfortable with the bare rudimentary basics of
working in rio & acme, I decided to stop, and start all over again from
scratch - but this time taking extensive no
btw, shouldn't mkfs use allproto by default like mk9660 does
or am I just missing something?
On Mon, Jul 20, 2009 at 6:55 AM, Charles Forsyth wrote:
>>Before I say anythign daft, what's '+'? It does not appear to be special on
>>my system.
>
> it's interpreted by mkfs in its proto file to mean al
On Wed, Jul 22, 2009 at 18:19, Charles Forsyth wrote:
> >if there is no real browser for the platform,
> >how will Plan 9 participate in the "cloud computing" (r)evolution?
>
> not using a browser.
>
Fair enough. I hope the services I want to use (will) have a non-browser
API (eg Twitter).
Jaso
> not using a browser.
> careful now.
> down with this sort of thing!
does this mean we should expect an influx of viewers due to the
negative publicity?
let´s rewrite everything in Ada.
We can use the distributed systems annex in a cloud.
On Thu, Jul 23, 2009 at 1:19 AM, Charles Forsyth wrote:
>>if there is no real browser for the platform,
>>how will Plan 9 participate in the "cloud computing" (r)evolution?
>
> not using a browser.
> careful now.
> Which brings me to repeat a question about Plan9, from another thread: if
> there is no real browser for the platform, how will Plan 9 participate in
> the "cloud computing" (r)evolution? I suppose it would be enough to have a
> Chromium port, if Chrome and the Chrome OS gain traction.
"clouds"
>if there is no real browser for the platform,
>how will Plan 9 participate in the "cloud computing" (r)evolution?
not using a browser.
careful now.
down with this sort of thing!
This passage seems to me to speak to the minimal spirit in Plan 9.
"... the best choice of software is often no software -- and barring that,
as little software as you can possibly get away with, and even then, only
from the most reputable and reliable sources."
http://www.codinghorror.com/blog/
On Wed, Jul 22, 2009 at 10:57 AM, hiro <23h...@googlemail.com> wrote:
> > Yeah, I'm pretty sure that, in an emulated environment, I'd pick kfs over
> > Venti, most of the time, unless your goal is to learn about Venti and
> Fossil
>
> Why specifically in an emulated environment?
>
Just because it
On Jul 19, 2009, at 22:29, Corey wrote:
On Sunday 19 July 2009 19:12:50 Skip Tavakkolian wrote:
The few minutes spent learning ed(1) will be well repaid. You'll be
one of the smartest guys on your block.
i second that. learning it has been one of the best investments of
my
time since
> Yeah, I'm pretty sure that, in an emulated environment, I'd pick kfs over
> Venti, most of the time, unless your goal is to learn about Venti and Fossil
Why specifically in an emulated environment?
hello
I already rebooted the machine so I can't check this anymore on a live system,
but as you said, the clock was out of sync 10 minutes from what it sould, I
activated timesync again ( /proc still shows the same incorrect date).
Also i did a snap of a broken proc a day before I found the mac
On Wed Jul 22 11:49:54 EDT 2009, s...@plan9.bell-labs.com wrote:
> Very odd. There are no blocking operations in reading the status file in
> /proc.
> The only thing I can think of is that you have something bound (snapfs?) in
> /proc
> and that you're hanging on a stale mount point.
>
> Is the
Very odd. There are no blocking operations in reading the status file in /proc.
The only thing I can think of is that you have something bound (snapfs?) in
/proc
and that you're hanging on a stale mount point.
Is the clock set properly on that machine?
Sape
> hello
>
> today i found 9g
On Wed, Jul 22, 2009 at 6:13 AM, erik quanstrom wrote:
> > ... but which would be considered the most logical place to deal with
> > things such as setting hd parameters for the machine on bootup like
> > the 'echo dma on > /dev/sdC0/ctl' example above?
>
> also see dmaon(8). just as an obvious n
> ... but which would be considered the most logical place to deal with
> things such as setting hd parameters for the machine on bootup like
> the 'echo dma on > /dev/sdC0/ctl' example above?
also see dmaon(8). just as an obvious note, this only
affects interfaces using ide or ide emulation. yo
> /rc/bin/termrc
> /rc/bin/termrc.local
> /cfg/$sysname/termrc
> ... but which would be considered the most logical place to deal with
> things such as setting hd parameters for the machine on bootup like
> the 'echo dma on > /dev/sdC0/ctl' example above?
In /cfg/$sysname/termrc, because you migh
As a further question on that point, where would you say would be the
best place to persist that command?
As far as I'm aware, my likely choices would be one of (in order of
execution):
/rc/bin/termrc
/rc/bin/termrc.local
/cfg/$sysname/termrc
I generally avoid touching termrc, put site-speci
On Tuesday 21 July 2009 22:59:49 Josh Wood wrote:
> > How do I enable hd dma? There's a dmamode=ask in my plan9.ini, but
> > I don't
> > see that option mentioned in the plan9.ini man.
>
> echo dma on > /dev/sdXY/ctl
>
> see in sd(3).
>
Excellent - thanks.
As a further question on that point, wh
21 matches
Mail list logo
