Hi Luigi,
Thanks for your mail!
See inline.
On Fri, Aug 19, 2022 at 10:09 PM Luigi IANNONE
wrote:
> Hi Alexander,
>
>
>
> Thanks for your feedback. Please send us the tons of questions you have we
> will do our best to answer them.
>
Thank you for providing some initial reactions to my questi
Dear Guangpeng,
Thanks for your reply!
I'll start with what I wrote earlier - it is important to define which
scenarios/use-cases are the goal of this draft, and what are the benefits
for these scenarios/use-cases.
The analysis you provide is interesting, but I cannot really connect it to
the re
Luigi IANNONE wrote:
> Hi Alexander,
> Thanks for your feedback. Please send us the tons of questions you have
> we will do our best to answer them.
Well, Alexander and a few others including me, have asked for more detailed
and more specific use cases. The existence of the
https:
An editorial comment about Figure 1 in
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-li-nsa-reliability/
In the ROLL WG and often in 6lo authors have adopted a convention to number
the nodes such that they are incremented by 10 for each layer, and numbered
from left to right.
See, for instance:
https:/
Alexander Pelov wrote:
> I'd be happy to discuss specific scenarios/use-cases that come from a
> real-world need.
> In any case, I think these are required before accepting the draft as a
> WG item.
Well, there really aren't any formal requirements to adopt a draft as a WG
item.
Dear Alexander,
I think the use case document in 6lo is adequate to record the scenarios. (see
4.1 in https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-6lo-use-cases/ ) . For
instance, the real world use case provided by Rong Long earlier in ML should be
included by “Smart thermostats, air condition
Hi Michael,
Thanks for share of Carpenter's draft. I fully agree with the content of it
after a quick read. I think it's for all adoption process, not only for this
adoption call. I believe 6lo Chairs' professional actions.
About the technical related concern:
> One concern that I have with NS
