Luigi IANNONE <luigi.iannone=40huawei....@dmarc.ietf.org> wrote:
> Hi Alexander,
> Thanks for your feedback. Please send us the tons of questions you have
> we will do our best to answer them.
Well, Alexander and a few others including me, have asked for more detailed
and more specific use cases. The existence of the
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-li-nsa-reliability/ draft makes me
doubt whether or not nsa is useable on it's own. (And please resubmit it
with 6lo in it's name)
I have now seen a slightly reasonable use case, but I remain skeptical about
the overall utility. I would like to see some running code.
> In general I think that the concerns that you are expressing can be
> solved during the normal life cycle of a draft as a WG item.
Sure, as long as you agree that it could be that the objections are fatal,
and that the document might not get published.
The other question is whether or not you have looked at the BIER routing work
that we started in ROLL, as that actually might map even better to your use
case.
--
Michael Richardson <mcr+i...@sandelman.ca> . o O ( IPv6 IøT consulting )
Sandelman Software Works Inc, Ottawa and Worldwide
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ 6lo mailing list 6lo@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/6lo
