F27 boots to grub> after (failed?) dnf update ?
I ran DNF update via ssh on my x86_64 FC27 server the other day. For some reason it didn't finish and when I rebooted it, it boots to a grub prompt. "Minimal BASH-like line editing..." grub> So... grub> set root=(lvm/fedora/root) grub> linuxefi (hd0,gpt2)/linuz-4.14.13-300.fc27.x86_64 grub>initrdefi (hd0,gpt2)/initramfs-4.14.13-300.fc27.x86_64.img grub>boot This gives me a switch root error and stops at the emergency mode prompt #. How do I get my server to boot again ? Thanks ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: F27 boots to grub> after (failed?) dnf update ?
I also did this, to no avail. mkdir temproot mount /dev/fedora/root temproot cd temproot mount /dev/sda2 boot mount --bind /dev temproot/dev mount --bind /proc temproot/proc mount --bind /sys temproot/sys chroot temproot grub2-mkconfig -o /boot/grub2/grub.cfg ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: F27 boots to grub> after (failed?) dnf update ?
Thanks for the reply. I thought that "set root=(lvm/fedora/root)" told the boot process where root was. Where is this stuff documented ? So I should add something like "root=/dev/mapper/fedora-root" to the Linuxefi line ? Do I need anything else to get a minimal system running ? On Mon, Mar 26, 2018 at 4:38 PM, Samuel Sieb wrote: > On 03/26/2018 09:14 AM, linux guy wrote: > >> "Minimal BASH-like line editing..." grub> >> >> So... >> >> grub> set root=(lvm/fedora/root) >> grub> linuxefi (hd0,gpt2)/linuz-4.14.13-300.fc27.x86_64 >> grub>initrdefi (hd0,gpt2)/initramfs-4.14.13-300.fc27.x86_64.img >> grub>boot >> >> This gives me a switch root error and stops at the emergency mode prompt >> #. >> > > You're missing all the parameters to the kernel that tell it where the > root is. > > How do I get my server to boot again ? >> > > From your other email: > > > grub2-mkconfig -o /boot/grub2/grub.cfg > > That's the wrong place for an EFI system. You need to mount the EFI > partition (probably /dev/sda1 in your case) at /boot/efi and the grub.cfg > is in /boot/efi/EFI/fedora/. > ___ > users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org > To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org > ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: F27 boots to grub> after (failed?) dnf update ?
Thanks for the reply. This allowed me to boot my system to a working KDE session: grub> set root=(lvm/fedora/root) grub> linuxefi (hd0,gpt2)/linuz-4.14.13-300.fc27.x86_64 root=/dev/mapper/fedora-root grub>initrdefi (hd0,gpt2)/initramfs-4.14.13-300.fc27.x86_64.img grub>boot I ran "grub2-mkconfig -o /boot/efi/EFI/fedora/grub.cfg" and it seemed to generate a valid grub.cfg file. Do I need to do anything else to utilize that file, like a grub2-install ? https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/GRUB_2 ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: F27 boots to grub> after (failed?) dnf update ?
Thanks ! ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Sharing USB Serial data with 2 processes ?
Hi. I've got a USB serial device that supplies data to a process via /dev/ttyUSB0. I need to use the same data for a 2nd, independent process. I have code for both processes and can make changes, but I would prefer not to. Is there a way that both processes can use the same serial USB data stream ? Thanks. PS: Is there a better place to ask this question ? ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
GUI setup for quasi real time process ?
We need a gui for a quasi real time process, which will run on a dedicated computer. We need to be able to view and control the process from a number of terminals, some on the local network, some remotely, over the Internet. I hope all the terminals will run Linux, but invariably someone will want to run Windows. What is the best way to set something like this up ? Use a web server to interface with the process and web browsers to view and control it ? Write a Java app to interface directly with the process ? All thoughts, ideas and advice is welcome. ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: Lots of instabilities in F13 ?
Everything was fine in F12. Right now I have the following issues: 1) Network Manager doesn't have an icon in my system tray. 2) Firefox is a bit unstable from time to time. 3) Evolution refuses to connect to the network connection for the session. -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
knetworkmanager doesn't work; Evolution and Firefox start offline ?
I'm running F13, fully up to date. This morning I encountered a number of problems. 1) Evolution starts in "Offline" mode, ie it doesn't think there is a Network connection and there is now way to put it online. Thus I can't send or receive emails with it. 2) Firefox starts in "Offline" mode, but I can set it to being online and then it runs normally. 3) knetworkmanager won't run. Nothing happens if I start it from the command line. Anyone else having similar issues ? Any ideas on how to trick Evolution into thinking there is a network connection ? Thanks $ uname -a Linux localhost.localdomain 2.6.33.5-124.fc13.i686.PAE #1 SMP Fri Jun 11 09:42:24 UTC 2010 i686 i686 i386 GNU/Linux $ rpm -q knetworkmanager knetworkmanager-0.9-0.20.20100603.fc13.i686 $ rpm -q evolution evolution-2.30.2-1.fc13.i686 $ rpm -q kdelibs kdelibs-4.4.5-1.fc13.i686 -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
Re: knetworkmanager doesn't work; Evolution and Firefox start offline ?
On Mon, Jul 19, 2010 at 12:36 PM, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote: > > Fix number 3 and the other two will go away. Or use nm-applet instead. > In any case, make sure NM is controlling your interface. > > Agreed. What package is nm-applet in ? -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
F14 locks up during graphical login into KDE
Hi people. My F14 system is hanging during graphical login/boot into KDE. The mouse becomes intermittent and then it freezes. However, if I start a CLI session before it hangs, the CLI session runs fine. The machine will NOT shut down properly. It hangs during shutdown. It looks like one or more processes won't stop properly. I believe this started happening after running yum update yesterday during which I noted that a new nvidia driver was installed. I am running the proprietary nvidia driver, not nouveau. (Ducks !) Any ideas why this is happening ? Anyone else having the same problem ? Thanks ! -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
F15 Upgrade kernel won't run.
My computer will not boot the F15 kernel after doing a preupgrade. Nothing happens when the boot process usually starts running. Not a single line of startup is displayed on the screen. This happens both if I run preupgrade or preupgrade-cli. Everything seems to go fine during the preupgrade process. All the files download and run fine, no errors or anything. Other kernels on the computer boot fine. Its like it can't find one of the boot files. Any ideas ? Thanks ! -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
Re: F14 locks up during graphical login into KDE
/var/log/message is FILLED with NVRM os_pci_init_handle$: invalid context messages. -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
Re: F14 locks up during graphical login into KDE
The latest version of KDE, as available from KDE-updates repo. It looks like 4.6.5 judged by the yum list. I have 5 or so kernels installed and I don't think any of them will run. There is nothing of significance running in "top", from the CLI session anyway. I can't run it from a graphical session. dmesg is clean. BTW: I upgraded the wireless router yesterday. (Linksys E4200) This machine is running wireless N for the first time and it is throwing errors from time to time. -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
Re: F14 locks up during graphical login into KDE
Sounds very similar Mark. Any other info you can share ? Video card ? Acceleration settings ? Is it possible to roll back the nvidia update via yum ? (Please save the sermon on proprietary drivers for later...) My system is fine during login. It too starts to lock during the later stages of booting into the graphical session. One in a while I can get a desktop up before it locks. I'm booting from an SSD. -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
Re: F14 locks up during graphical login into KDE
F15 on my Dell Duo (Intel Atom, i915) just stopped booting. Looks like something similar. -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
Re: F14 locks up during graphical login into KDE
Just ran yum update on it. It runs KDE too. However, I haven't been able to get into the CLI on it. Here is what the messages on the screen say. Starting /boot... Started /boot. systemd[1]: Job devmapper-vg_duo\xdlv_home.device/start timed out. systemd[1]: Job Fedora-autorelabel-mark.service/start failed with result 'dependency' And on it goes... -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
Re: Latest update boots to blank screen (nvidia)
I've got boot issues in F14 and F15 preupgrade. I haven't had a boot issue in Linux for years ! -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
Re: Latest update boots to blank screen (nvidia)
How did you roll back the update ? Thanks ! -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
Re: F14 locks up during graphical login into KDE
On Thu, Aug 25, 2011 at 11:18 AM, n2xssvv.g02gfr12930 < n2xssvv.g02gfr12...@ntlworld.com> wrote: > > > I had this problem, and it turned out to be the nvidia libraries being > updated but not the driver itself. The fix involved changing to the vesa > video driver and installing the akmod nvidia driver before resetting to > the nvidia driver. > > HTH > No joy on this. From the CLI I uninstalled kmod-nvidia and installed akmod-nvidia and also kernel-devel. It still locks during graphical login. -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
Re: Nvidia driver update problem
How did you arrive at this kill list ? killall -9 compiz;killall -9 gtk-window-decorator;metacity --replace& -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
Re: Nvidia driver update problem
I don't have any desktop effects enabled that I know of. It might not be so easy for KDE users to solve this problem. -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
Re: F15 Upgrade kernel won't run.
Nobody has any ideas ? Where do I go from here ? Thanks -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
Re: F14 locks up during graphical login into KDE
Any progress on this issue ? I'm hoping that an update will appear that fixes the problem. Am I dreaming ? My next step would be to install an older kernel and roll back the kmod-nvidia. Is it worth doing ? I deleted all but the most recent kernel to prepare for an update to F15. -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
Re: F15 Upgrade kernel won't run.
Here is my grub.conf file. # grub.conf generated by anaconda # # Note that you do not have to rerun grub after making changes to this file # NOTICE: You have a /boot partition. This means that # all kernel and initrd paths are relative to /boot/, eg. # root (hd0,0) # kernel /vmlinuz-version ro root=/dev/sda2 # initrd /initrd-version.img # boot=/dev/sda default=1 timeout=15 splashimage=(hd0,0)/grub/splash.xpm.gz hiddenmenu title Upgrade to Fedora 15 (Lovelock) kernel /upgrade/vmlinuz preupgrade repo=hd::/var/cache/yum/preupgrade ks=hd:UUID=68c84152-0834-4e6d-b680-067752edc827:/upgrade/ks.cfg initrd /upgrade/initrd.img title Fedora (2.6.35.14-95.fc14.i686.PAE) root (hd0,0) kernel /vmlinuz-2.6.35.14-95.fc14.i686.PAE ro root=UUID=f543d554-9344-4cad-a7da-47de47cd2665 verbose rhgb SYSFONT=latarcyrheb-sun16 LANG=en_US.UTF-8 KEYTABLE=us nouveau.modeset=0 rdblacklist=nouveau selinux=0 initrd /initramfs-2.6.35.14-95.fc14.i686.PAE.img title Fedora (2.6.35.14-95.fc14.i686) root (hd0,0) kernel /vmlinuz-2.6.35.14-95.fc14.i686 ro root=UUID=f543d554-9344-4cad-a7da-47de47cd2665 verbose rhgb SYSFONT=latarcyrheb-sun16 LANG=en_US.UTF-8 KEYTABLE=us nouveau.modeset=0 rdblacklist=nouveau selinux=0 initrd /initramfs-2.6.35.14-95.fc14.i686.img === -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
Re: F14 locks up during graphical login into KDE
Yum update last night had updates to kdm and kdebase. I installed them, hoping it would fix my problem. No joy. -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
Re: F15 Upgrade kernel won't run.
Commenting those lines out causes the F14 (non upgrade) kernel to run, thus preventing the upgrade from completing. Which is what I am trying to achieve. In case its been missed, I'm trying to upgrade from F14 to F15. On 8/27/11, panicloop wrote: > On 08/28/2011 01:00 AM, linux guy wrote: >> Here is my grub.conf file. >> >> >> # grub.conf generated by anaconda >> # >> # Note that you do not have to rerun grub after making changes to this >> file >> # NOTICE: You have a /boot partition. This means that >> # all kernel and initrd paths are relative to /boot/, eg. >> # root (hd0,0) >> # kernel /vmlinuz-version ro root=/dev/sda2 >> # initrd /initrd-version.img >> # >> boot=/dev/sda >> default=1 >> timeout=15 >> splashimage=(hd0,0)/grub/splash.xpm.gz >> hiddenmenu >> title Upgrade to Fedora 15 (Lovelock) >> kernel /upgrade/vmlinuz preupgrade repo=hd::/var/cache/yum/preupgrade >> ks=hd:UUID=68c84152-0834-4e6d-b680-067752edc827:/upgrade/ks.cfg >> initrd /upgrade/initrd.img >> title Fedora (2.6.35.14-95.fc14.i686.PAE) >> root (hd0,0) >> kernel /vmlinuz-2.6.35.14-95.fc14.i686.PAE ro >> root=UUID=f543d554-9344-4cad-a7da-47de47cd2665 verbose rhgb >> SYSFONT=latarcyrheb-sun16 LANG=en_US.UTF-8 KEYTABLE=us >> nouveau.modeset=0 rdblacklist=nouveau >> selinux=0 >> initrd /initramfs-2.6.35.14-95.fc14.i686.PAE.img >> title Fedora (2.6.35.14-95.fc14.i686) >> root (hd0,0) >> kernel /vmlinuz-2.6.35.14-95.fc14.i686 ro >> root=UUID=f543d554-9344-4cad-a7da-47de47cd2665 verbose rhgb >> SYSFONT=latarcyrheb-sun16 LANG=en_US.UTF-8 KEYTABLE=us >> nouveau.modeset=0 rdblacklist=nouveau >> selinux=0 >> initrd /initramfs-2.6.35.14-95.fc14.i686.img >> === >> >> > > Hi, > > It seems that things are more compilcated than I thought. > I recommend that you will backup the data to another USB disk > and restore them after clean install of F15. > > I think you can boot with previous F14 kernel > if you change the following to grub.conf > > [1] Change the following line > > default=1 > to > default=0 > > [2] Comment out the following 3 lines with '#' > > #title Upgrade to Fedora 15 (Lovelock) > #kernel /upgrade/vmlinuz preupgrade repo=hd::/var/cache/yum/preupgrade > ks=hd:UUID=68c84152-0834-4e6d-b680-067752edc827:/upgrade/ks.cfg > #initrd /upgrade/initrd.img > > Good luck. > > -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
Re: F15 Upgrade kernel won't run.
On Sat, Aug 27, 2011 at 8:25 PM, Kam Leo wrote: > On Sat, Aug 27, 2011 at 10:55 AM, linux guy wrote: > > Commenting those lines out causes the F14 (non upgrade) kernel to run, > > thus preventing the upgrade from completing. Which is what I am > > trying to achieve. > > > > In case its been missed, I'm trying to upgrade from F14 to F15. > > > > In case you missed it, using preupgrade is a hit or miss proposition. > The simplest recovery method is to abandon all the files that were > downloaded and install from a CD. > I used to upgrade that way. I did miss the memo. Which CD does one use these days ? F15 Live runs fine on the machine in question. How exactly does one initiate the upgrade ? Thanks ! -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
Re: F15 Upgrade kernel won't run.
So which ISO does one use for an upgrade ? Does a Live ISO do it ? Or is there another one ? -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
Re: F15 Upgrade kernel won't run.
The upgrade can only be run from a DVD iso. I found them here: http://fedoraproject.org/en/get-fedora-options#formats -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
Re: F15 Upgrade kernel won't run.
For the record, I didn't say my system didn't have enough room on /boot. I didn't receive any memory warnings or errors while running pre upgrade prior to rebooting, so I don't think that is the case. -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
Upgrading via DVD iso on a USB storage device.
I want to upgrade from F14 to F15. For whatever reason, the boot after running preupgrade fails if I try to do it that way. So now I would like to upgrade via the DVD iso. I would like to do so without burning a DVD. I'd like to load the DVD iso onto a USB flash storage device and boot it from that. I tried using the Fedora Live USB Creator tool. It gives me a "Unable to find LiveOS on ISO" error. How do I put the DVD iso image on a USB flash storage device so it will boot ? Thanks -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
Re: Upgrading via DVD iso on a USB storage device.
Will these instructions for prior versions work for the F15 DVD iso ? Thanks -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
Re: Upgrading via DVD iso on a USB storage device.
http://forums.fedoraforum.org/showthread.php?t=205596 On Sun, Aug 28, 2011 at 12:04 PM, linux guy wrote: > Will these instructions for prior versions work for the F15 DVD iso ? > > Thanks > -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
Re: Upgrading via DVD iso on a USB storage device.
The F11 instructions don't work. F15 doesn't have a file named boot.iso at /mnt/iso/images. There is a directory called pxeboot there, but it doesn't have any iso files ? -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
How does one run yum on a non working system ?
Is there a way to run yum to update the files on a non working system when booting from a live or rescue iso ? Thanks -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
Kernel bug ?
I get the following when I boot F15 on my Dell Duo. kernel BUG at drivers/media/media-entity.c 346! invalid opcode: [#1] SMP Modules linked in: snd_hda_codec_conexant uvcvideo(+) microcode(+) snd_hda_intel(+) It goes on from there, including a Call Trace. My Duo won't boot because of this problem. Its also not displaying the grub kernel selection screen. It just boots. It runs F15 Live just fine. How do I fix this problem or what can I do to work around it ? Thanks -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
Re: How does one run yum on a non working system ?
On Sun, Aug 28, 2011 at 4:58 PM, jdow wrote: > > chroot not needed. Use "--installroot=root". Substitute the mountpoint > for the damaged system. I believe that should work for him. > I knew there was a way. I couldn't find it in the man page. Thanks for sharing that. -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
Re: Kernel bug ?
You were right about timeout = 0 in grub.conf. I changed it to 15 and I can now select a kernel again. The kernel bug error message is appearing when I run kernel 2.6.40.3-o.fc15. The Duo runs nicely with kernel 2.6.38.6-26.rc1.fc15 Its so nice to have the Duo booting again ! -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
Continued problems with kernel 2.6.40.3-0 and nvidia 280.13-2 in fc15 ?
Am I the only one having problems with kernel 2.6.40.3-0 and/or (a)kmod-nvidia 280.13-2 in fc14 and/or fc15 ? My Dell duo won't boot the afore mentioned kernel at all. It fails with a kernel bug message. It runs prior kernels just fine. My HP laptop freezes during a graphical session login with the aforementioned kernel and nvidia module. It did so in FC14. I upgraded to fc15 and it does the same thing. The same laptop runs the F15 Live iso just fine and also runs the aforementioned kernel from the cli just fine. The problem is only when a graphical session is being used. Is anyone else having the same problem or is it just me ? -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
Re: Continued problems with kernel 2.6.40.3-0 and nvidia 280.13-2 in fc15 ?
I suspect the lockup during the graphical session is due to an nvidia problem. I'd like to downgrade to kmod-nvidia-173xx-2.6.40.3-0.fc15.i686-173.14.31-1.fc15.1, but there are several conflicts with various xorg files that I am not sure how to handle. Has anyone successfully downgraded kmod-nvidia and solved this problem ? Thanks -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
Re: Continued problems with kernel 2.6.40.3-0 and nvidia 280.13-2 in fc15 ?
I removed all yum entries related to nvidia and deleted xorg.conf and it runs without crashing. -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
F15: Worst. Update. Ever.
I just wanted to share what a troublesome, irritating process it was to update my F14 KDE box to F15. When it was released, I immediately downloaded F15 KDE Live ISO and installed it on a USB drive. I was quite impressed. Shortly thereafter, I ran pre upgrade, only to find that the pre upgrade kernel wouldn't run when I rebooted. About that time I got busy with other things in my life and just stayed running F14. Until about a week ago when yum update installed kernel 2.6.40-3 and nvidia-280. At that point my computer started hanging whenever I logged into a graphical work session. This was on a machine that has been running Fedora reliably since new. I spent a considerable amount of time trying to troubleshoot the boot hanging problem. To no avail. After a while I decided it would be better to upgrade to F15, thinking the problem was the new nvidia-280 driver and some older xorg file in F14. So I then spent a considerable amount of time trying to figure out why the F15 preupgrade kernel wouldn't boot properly. After a while I gave up on getting it to work. I decided to upgrade via the F15 Upgrade DVD. I downloaded the ISO file and tried for a while to install it on a USB drive, to no avail. After a while I gave up on getting that to work and burned it to a DVD. The upgrade ran without a hitch from the upgrade DVD. Or so it thought. Right off the bat, F15 wouldn't boot either, just like F14 wouldn't. After some digging around, I got it to boot by removing all akmod-nvidia and kmod-nvidia files as well as my xorg.conf file. Which, incidentally, has run fine forever. At that point I could now boot F15 and log into a graphical work session. But not a KDE session ! Apparently none of my KDE packages had been upgraded and my system now only had F15 gnome packages on it. Upon running yum update in F15, I was greeted with 57 error messages from yum check. All of these errors were concerned with missing dependencies for F14 packages that did not get upgraded via the upgrade DVD and/or F14 packages that the upgrade process decided to leave even though there was also an F15 version on the machine. After spending a considerable amount of time, I determined the best way to deal with the situation was to delete all the offending F14 packages. So I did. Yum update then ran fine. I then added back the packages that were deleted that did not have F15 equivalents. At that point I reinstalled KDE in its entirety. Which is where I sit today. F15 works great, but what a process to get here. -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
Getting Intel 4965 wireless working in F15 ?
Any quick tips on how one would get wireless working on a laptop with the Intel 4965 device on it in F15 ? $ yum list installed \*wl\* Loaded plugins: changelog, downloadonly, kmdl, refresh-packagekit Installed Packages broadcom-wl.noarch 5.60.48.36-1.fc13 @rpmfusion-nonfree iwl3945-firmware.noarch 15.32.2.9-5.fc15 @anaconda-InstallationRepo-201105131946.i686 iwl4965-firmware.noarch 228.61.2.24-3.fc15 @anaconda-InstallationRepo-201105131946.i686 kmod-wl.i686 5.60.48.36-2.fc15.7 @rpmfusion-nonfree-updates kmod-wl-2.6.40.3-0.fc15.i686.i686 5.60.48.36-2.fc15.7 @rpmfusion-nonfree-updates ppl-pwl.i686 0.11.2-1.fc15 @anaconda-InstallationRepo-201105131946.i686 python-iwlib.i686 0.1-6.fc15 @anaconda-InstallationRepo-201105131946.i686 $ lsmod | grep wl iwlagn229826 0 iwlcore 126002 1 iwlagn mac80211 201962 2 iwlagn,iwlcore cfg80211 116073 3 iwlagn,iwlcore,mac80211 $ yum list \*4965\* Installed Packages iwl4965-firmware.noarch228.61.2.24-3.fc15 Thanks ! -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
Re: Latest update boots to blank screen (nvidia)
> > I still cannot apply the latest kernel & nvidia package. Has anyone > resolved this? > > I got two of my computers with this problem to boot by removing all kmod-nvidia and akmod-nvidia files and also removing (renaming) /etc/X11/xorg.conf. This causes the machines to boot with the nouveau driver, which works for me, for now. I'll tackle the issue again when I have more time. -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
Re: Getting Intel 4965 wireless working in F15 ?
On Tue, Sep 6, 2011 at 10:35 AM, Ranjan Maitra wrote: > I have this wireless for over four years now, and this works just fine, > from off-the-shelf. Have you tried using the LiveCD to check whether > the wireless is picked up? > > It works fine with the F15 live ISO. I can't figure out what the difference is between my real F15 install and running the Live ISO. Wireless "just worked" on this machine in F14 and has for a several releases now. No problems whatsoever. I've tried using both the KDE and Gnome applets in F15. Neither one shows any available wireless APs. Running the Live ISO, I see several. What is the minimum set of packages that one needs to run wireless in F15 ? I have a feeling I'm missing something. Thanks -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
Re: F15: Worst. Update. Ever.
Update. I still have 2 outstanding issues with my F15 system. 1) Wireless networking is not operational, even though wireless worked fine in F15 Live. Its not apparent to me what is different between my F15 install and the F15 Live iso. I've started a thread on this issue. 2) The process that converted emails to the new format for Evolution somehow got interrupted and only 10% of my emails have been converted to the new format. It is not apparent to me how to convert/ reconvert the remaining emails. I'll start a thread on this topic shortly. I'm still running nouveau and I'm running 1 monitor, not 2 like I used to. I'll get to that issue later. -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
How to I (re)convert my emails to the new Evolution format ?
I updated from F14 to F15 and in the process from Evolution 2.x to 3.0.2. There were numerous (non Evolution) issues during the update process. Somehow the Evolution mail conversion tool got interrupted and thus only about 10% of my emails were converted to the new format. How do I rerun the tool and convert the rest of my emails to the new format ? Thanks ! FWIW: This is a cross post from a post I did on the Evolution user mailing list. I didn't like the answer that I received there. I'm hoping for a better one here. -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
Re: F15: Worst. Update. Ever.
On Thu, Sep 8, 2011 at 2:52 AM, Pedro Francisco wrote: > Is 1) solvable by doing su -c 'service Network-Manager restart' or > something similar? Because if so it's gnome-shell's applet fault, I think. > Performed the following. # service NetworkManager stop Redirecting to /bin/systemctl stop NetworkManager.service # service NetworkManager start Redirecting to /bin/systemctl start NetworkManager.service No joy. Thanks for the tip though. -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
F15 Samba shares: SWAT, smb.conf, system-config or KDE file share properties ? Bug ?
I'm building a NAS server using Samba. Its a mixed OS network. I just spent several hours chasing some really funny bugs. I started out using SWAT in Firefox. I'd make a change in SWAT and commit it. Then I'd view the file. So far so good. Usually the change didn't run like it should have. Ie a share directory didn't get changed, etc. Then I tried system-config-samba. Then I tried using KDE via Dolphin, folder properties, sharing, etc. Then I tried manually editing smb.conf After each attempt I restarted smb and nmb. After a while I realized that the server was running with the settings from several changes ago and that the only way I could be sure that my changes were being used was to reboot after every change. Is there a bug somewhere in here or am I missing something ? Is it ok to mix and match these tools as the need arises or should I be using one over the other ? Thanks -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
What processes run on first boot after upgrading ? (Evolution format updater)
What processes run on first boot and only first boot after upgrading to F15 ? Is the Evolution email format updater one of those processes ? Or how does it get invoked ? Thanks -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
Where is the computer network name set and stored ?
When one installs F15 (KDE) via the Live ISO, the second part of the install process asks the user to set the computer network name, ie localhost@localdomain. When one changes localhost to another name, it shows up in the DHCP clients table of my Linksys E4200 router page. I like that. Where is this name stored ? How does one change what its set to ? $ cat /etc/hosts 127.0.0.1 localhost.localdomain localhost ::1 localhost6.localdomain6 localhost6 Thanks -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
DHCP or fixed IPs for servers ????
I have a number of servers on our local network. I have always set the IP on my servers manually, ie disabled DHCP and assigned each one a unique fixed IP. Is there a practical way to assign an IP to a server automatically, ie with DHCP and still have other computers find it on the network and have services like port forwarding, firewalls, etc. work properly in routers ? Thanks -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
Re: Where is the computer network name set and stored ?
On Mon, Sep 19, 2011 at 12:42 AM, g wrote: > > man hostname > > Thanks -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
What has happened to the Zoneminder website/ info ?
I would like to set up Zoneminder to run some security cameras. When I google various Zoneminder topics, invariably the website www.zoneminder.com gets mentions. That website, and all the documentation on it seems to be no longer in service. Anyone know what is up with that ? Where can one get access to some good zoneminder information, like, for example, a list of hardware that works well with it ? Thanks ! -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
Re: DHCP or fixed IPs for servers ????
Thanks. I'll continue to statically assign the server ips. -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
Bug in system-config-firewall ?
Hi people. I'm setting up ssh on a server box. I'm using system-config-firewall to open up port 22 for it. Here is the thing... it *appears* that system-config-firewall has port 22 opened up by default, for some reason. Ie the port is checked on the port list in system-config-firewall. However, if I run nmap from the remote machine (nmap -sS -F 192.168...) it shows all the ports to be closed. If I unselect port 22 and press Apply and then select it and press Apply again, nmap finds it open and all is well. However, if I then reboot, the port is again closed ! One seems to need to repeat the unselect-Apply/ select-Apply procedure to get it working again. Is it just me or do others have the same problem ? There is also an issue with saving service setting in system-config-firewall on my machine, but I'll get to that later. What other program are people using to manage their firewall settings. I'm not a fan of manually entering iptable entries. $ uname -a Linux zoneminder.localdomain 2.6.40.4-5.fc15.i686 #1 SMP Tue Aug 30 14:54:41 UTC 2011 i686 i686 i386 GNU/Linux $ yum list system-config-firewall system-config-firewall.noarch 1.2.29-4.fc15 Thanks ! -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
Re: DHCP or fixed IPs for servers ????
Something I should interject here is that it isn't just setting the IP address of the server. I find the biggest problem is keeping the /etc/hosts lists current on all the clients. Is there a way to statically assign the IP address to the servers and not have to update the /etc/hosts file on all the machines ? I know this is what DNS is supposed to do, but I've never used it that way. Furthermore, my DNS server would be the local router, not a dedicated PC, unless we changed that too. Thanks for the replies thus far. Its great to hear the responses of people more experienced than I. LG -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
Re: Bug in system-config-firewall ?
I found a work around. Instead of entering port 22 as a "Trusted Port", enter it manually as an "Other Port". What is it with Linux (ie Fedora, Ubuntu, etc) and firewall managers ? Firestarter was crap for years and now we have this ? I think I know why Samba wasn't working when I set it up last week. I spent at least a day working on it. I never thought to run nmap. Live, pay and learn. LG -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
Re: What has happened to the Zoneminder website/ info ?
On Mon, Sep 19, 2011 at 8:56 AM, Joe Zeff wrote: > On 09/18/2011 11:48 PM, linux guy wrote: > > I would like to set up Zoneminder to run some security cameras. > > > > When I google various Zoneminder topics, invariably the website > > www.zoneminder.com <http://www.zoneminder.com> gets mentions. > > > > That website, and all the documentation on it seems to be no longer in > > service. Anyone know what is up with that ? > > > > The only thing I know is that the site came right up for me. Try again. > Its back up ! -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
Tips on setting up the precompiled zoneminder in F15 ?
Has anyone set up and used the precompiled zoneminder app in F15 ? Could you share your instructions or contribute to this thread ? http://www.zoneminder.com/forums/viewtopic.php?f=21&t=18236&p=71948#p71948 Thanks -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
Re: Bug in system-config-firewall ?
I'm glad to hear it wasn't just my computer. I trust that you'll enter a bug report for this, Thomas ? You seem to have more detail on it than I do. There also seems to be an issue with the Options-> Configure Service Settings as well. If I check Save on Stop and/or Save on Restart and press OK, those options are not selected the next time I look. -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
Samba problems. Samba master fight with Linksys E4200 wireless router with storage ?
I'm having a lot of trouble setting up a Samba share on a virgin F15 install. Right now everything works until I click on a shared file (via Samba). At that point I get a "the file or folder smb://nas/TEST does not exist" error. This is what smbclient shows for 192.168.1.10, ie nas, my Samba server. $ smbclient -U% -L192.168.1.10 Domain=[WORKGROUP] OS=[Unix] Server=[Samba 3.5.11-71.fc15] Sharename Type Comment - --- TESTDisk IPC$IPC IPC Service (Samba Server Version 3.5.11-71.fc15) Domain=[WORKGROUP] OS=[Unix] Server=[Samba 3.5.11-71.fc15] Server Comment ---- E4200 NAS Samba Server Version 3.5.11-71.fc15 WorkgroupMaster ---- WORKGROUPE4200 For the longest time smbclient showed there was no master.Today, my E4200 wireless router, which has file sharing is showing up as master. I'm not sure if I should be OK with that or not. Given my smb.conf file, I was expecting nas to be the master. There doesn't appear to be a way to turn file sharing off in the E4200. Maybe if I set the workgroup on it to null ? # Samba config file created using SWAT # from UNKNOWN (127.0.0.1) # Date: 2011/09/19 21:06:20 [global] server string = Samba Server Version %v log file = /var/log/samba/log.%m max log size = 50 wins support = Yes cups options = raw workgroup = workgroup local master = yes domain master = yes os level = 65 [homes] comment = Home Directories read only = No browseable = No [printers] comment = All Printers path = /var/spool/samba printable = Yes browseable = No [TEST] path = /home/me/test/ guest ok = yes read only = no browseable = yes Any ideas on why Samba isn't working ? FWIW, I only used SWAT for looking at potential settings and setting a couple globals. The rest I've been doing by hand. And I've been restarting nmb and smb manually after each change. I'm finding the online documentation for Samba to be umm... wanting. I'll post up a little HOWTO when I get my NAS going. Thanks -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
Re: Samba problems. Samba master fight with Linksys E4200 wireless router with storage ?
Surely its not that hard to get Samba going. If it wasn't worth the effort, how else did you enable file sharing on a mixed client network ? Has anyone gotten Samba working from a virgin F15 install ? -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
Re: Samba problems. Samba master fight with Linksys E4200 wireless router with storage ?
On Tue, Sep 20, 2011 at 6:27 PM, Tom Horsley wrote: > On Tue, 20 Sep 2011 18:17:23 -0600 > linux guy wrote: > > > Has anyone gotten Samba working from a virgin F15 install ? > > Not exactly. Thank you very much for sharing that, Tom. I find the following two lines very interesting. dns proxy = No ldap ssl = no I'll test them out in the morning. > I used to use the web interface to try and > set up samba on each install of a new fedora, but at some > point, I could no longer duplicate my working setup by > starting from scratch with the web interface. I never figured > out why, Interesting. Could you tell me what users you have set up for Samba and what you log in as ? -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
Re: Samba problems. Samba master fight with Linksys E4200 wireless router with storage ?
On Tue, Sep 20, 2011 at 9:29 PM, Craig White wrote: > > For your problems... > > chkconfig smb on > chkconfig nmb on > service nmb restart > service smb restart > > Do you mean systemctl enable smb.service systemctl enable nmb.service systemctl start nmb.service systemctl start smb.service Because if you do, I've done that. It seems obvious that nmb service is not running on this system which > seems to be critical for your setup. > According to that status tab in SWAT, it is running. It can take 15 minutes for browser elections to result in a final winner > so be patient. > Please explain this. And I'm testing with Dolphin and Konqueror. > That should take care of the problem with the wireless router winning > the netbios master browser elections > > As for smbclient //nas/test > > what are the permissions of /home/me/test ? > Owned by a regular user with the name "me" of group users. Permission = 777. > > smbclient //NAS/test -U ? # Who is the user trying to connect? > > Craig > > > -- > This message has been scanned for viruses and > dangerous content by MailScanner, and is > believed to be clean. > > -- > users mailing list > users@lists.fedoraproject.org > To unsubscribe or change subscription options: > https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users > Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines > -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
Re: Where is the computer network name set and stored ?
For anyone still following this thread, using the hostname command to change the hostname does not result in a permanent change. As per the man file, it only changes it until the next reboot. = SET NAME When called with one argument or with the --file option, the commands set the host name or the NIS/YP domain name. hostname uses the sethostname(2) function, while all of the three domainname, ypdomainname and nisdomainname use set‐ domainname(2). Note, that this is effective only until the next reboot. After reboot original names from /etc/hosts are used again. = It appears to me that the only way to truly change the hostname of a machine is to edit /etc/sysconfig/network. But I might be wrong. -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
Wireless available, but no APs found when scanning.
F15, fully up to date, KDE session. Kstart->Settings->System Settings-> Network Settings -> Wireless -> Add -> Scan doesn't find any APs available. All my other F15 computers show several. Manually, it finds some. See below. It also finds them when running from the F15 Live ISO. Details $ uname -a Linux dragon.localdomain 2.6.40.4-5.fc15.i686 #1 SMP Tue Aug 30 14:54:41 UTC 2011 i686 i686 i386 GNU/Linux $ yum list kdebase kdebase.i686 6:4.6.5-1.fc15 $ yum list NetworkManager NetworkManager.i6861:0.9.0-1.fc15 $ lspci | grep Wire 02:06.0 FireWire (IEEE 1394): Ricoh Co Ltd R5C832 IEEE 1394 Controller (rev 05) 10:00.0 Network controller: Intel Corporation PRO/Wireless 4965 AG or AGN [Kedron] Network Connection (rev 61) $ lsmod | grep iwl iwl4965 150420 0 iwl_legacy113106 1 iwl4965 mac80211 211975 2 iwl4965,iwl_legacy cfg80211 126267 3 iwl4965,iwl_legacy,mac80211 Let me know if you need anything else. LG List of manual scan. # ifconfig wlan0 up # iwlist wlan0 scan wlan0 Scan completed : Cell 01 - Address: 00:13:10:F0:B9:15 Channel:6 Frequency:2.437 GHz (Channel 6) Quality=35/70 Signal level=-75 dBm Encryption key:off ESSID:"linksys123213" Bit Rates:1 Mb/s; 2 Mb/s; 5.5 Mb/s; 11 Mb/s; 18 Mb/s 24 Mb/s; 36 Mb/s; 54 Mb/s Bit Rates:6 Mb/s; 9 Mb/s; 12 Mb/s; 48 Mb/s Mode:Master Extra:tsf=05458a0c1104 Extra: Last beacon: 1559ms ago IE: Unknown: 000D6C696E6B737973313233323133 IE: Unknown: 010882848B962430486C IE: Unknown: 030106 IE: Unknown: 2A0100 IE: Unknown: 2F0100 IE: Unknown: 32040C121860 IE: Unknown: DD06001018010100 Cell 02 - Address: 58:6D:8F:27:D9:E6 Channel:149 Frequency:5.745 GHz (Channel 149) Quality=39/70 Signal level=-71 dBm Encryption key:on ESSID:"E4200" Bit Rates:6 Mb/s; 9 Mb/s; 12 Mb/s; 18 Mb/s; 24 Mb/s 36 Mb/s; 48 Mb/s; 54 Mb/s Mode:Master Extra:tsf= Extra: Last beacon: 503ms ago IE: Unknown: 00054534323030 IE: Unknown: 01088C129824B048606C IE: IEEE 802.11i/WPA2 Version 1 Group Cipher : CCMP Pairwise Ciphers (1) : CCMP Authentication Suites (1) : PSK IE: Unknown: 2D1A73081BFF IE: Unknown: 3D16950D IE: Unknown: DD7F0050F204104A00011010440001021041000100103B00010310470010081862432749CFF89FEA856B3EFAFCCC10210005436973636F1023000D4C696E6B7379732045343230301024000776312E302E30311042000234321054000800060050F20400011011000D4C696E6B737973204534323030100800020084103C000103 IE: Unknown: DD090010180200F03C IE: Unknown: DD180050F202010183A427A442435E0062322F00 Cell 03 - Address: 58:6D:8F:27:D9:E5 Channel:6 Frequency:2.437 GHz (Channel 6) Quality=49/70 Signal level=-61 dBm Encryption key:on ESSID:"E4200" Bit Rates:1 Mb/s; 2 Mb/s; 5.5 Mb/s; 11 Mb/s; 18 Mb/s 24 Mb/s; 36 Mb/s; 54 Mb/s Bit Rates:6 Mb/s; 9 Mb/s; 12 Mb/s; 48 Mb/s Mode:Master Extra:tsf= Extra: Last beacon: 1560ms ago IE: Unknown: 00054534323030 IE: Unknown: 010882848B962430486C IE: Unknown: 030106 IE: Unknown: 2A0100 IE: Unknown: 2F0100 IE: IEEE 802.11i/WPA2 Version 1 Group Cipher : CCMP Pairwise Ciphers (1) : CCMP Authentication Suites (1) : PSK IE: Unknown: 32040C121860 IE: Unknown: 2D1AF2181BFF IE: Unknown: 3D16060D1100 IE: Unknown: 4A0E14000A002C01C800140005001900 IE: Unknown: 7F0101 IE: Unknown: DD7F0050F204104A00011010440001021041000100103B00010310470010081862432749CFF89FEA856B3EFAFCCC10210005436973636F1023000D4C696E6B7379732045343230301024000776312E302E303110420
X11 Fails to initialize. ssh + KDE
X was working fine from several clients to several servers. Then it quit, for no (obvious to me) reason. Details here, let me know if you need more info. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=740466 Any ideas on why this is happening ? Thanks ! -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
Manually, remotely starting X for a remote session. DISPLAY.
X was working fine from several clients to several servers. Then it quit, for no (obvious to me) reason. Details here, let me know if you need more info. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=740466 How do I start X on the server from a remote machine (via ssh, of course) so that I can use graphical apps ? When I google this problem, there is some talk about the DISPLAY variable not being set. What should it be set to ? How should it be set ? Thanks LG -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
Fwd: Manually, remotely starting X for a remote session. DISPLAY.
On Wed, Sep 28, 2011 at 9:46 AM, Alan Cox wrote: > > sshd sets it when you do an ssh -X/-Y. If it isn't getting set then > either ssh isn't seeing suitable environment variables (eg ssh'ing into a > box and forgetting which box you were on when you do the ssh -Y), or it > can be blocked in the sshd config. > > Alan > Thanks for the reply, Alan. Great to see you jump in like that. How/when is X supposed to be started ? Part of the boot process, right ? Does anything shut it down, like a "timeout" on the login screen ? Thanks -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
Fwd: Manually, remotely starting X for a remote session. DISPLAY.
$ ssh me@server me@server's password: Last login: Tue Sep 27 20:16:30 2011 from 192.168.1.120 [me@server ~]$ echo $DISPLAY [me@server ~]$ What should it be set to ? $ yum list openssh Loaded plugins: langpacks, presto, refresh-packagekit Installed Packages openssh.i686 5.6p1-34.fc15.1 I'm not saying that I know the DISPLAY variable is the problem. I'm just providing information. -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
Re: Manually, remotely starting X for a remote session. DISPLAY.
On Wed, Sep 28, 2011 at 10:17 AM, Alan Cox wrote: > On Wed, 28 Sep 2011 10:06:48 -0600 > linux guy wrote: > > > $ ssh me@server > > me@server's password: > > Last login: Tue Sep 27 20:16:30 2011 from 192.168.1.120 > > [me@server ~]$ echo $DISPLAY > > > > [me@server ~]$ > > > > What should it be set to ? > > Nothing - you didn't specify -X or -Y > Me bad. For some reason I thought that -X was set by default. Apparently its not. Sorry for the waste of bandwidth. -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
My wireless connection quit. (F14/ 2.6.35/ Intel 4965 )
My wireless connection quit recently. Its worked fine since FC10 ? $ uname -a Linux localhost.localdomain 2.6.35.10-74.fc14.i686.PAE #1 SMP Thu Dec 23 16:10:47 UTC 2010 i686 i686 i386 GNU/Linux lspci Network controller: Intel Corporation PRO/Wireless 4965 AG or AGN [Kedron] Network Connection (rev 61) yum list \*manager\* NetworkManager.i686 1:0.8.1-10.git20100831.fc14 @anaconda-InstallationRepo-201010211814.i386 NetworkManager-glib.i686 1:0.8.1-10.git20100831.fc14 @anaconda-InstallationRepo-201010211814.i386 NetworkManager-gnome.i686 1:0.8.1-10.git20100831.fc14 @anaconda-InstallationRepo-201010211814.i386 NetworkManager-openconnect.i686 0.8.1-1.fc14 @anaconda-InstallationRepo-201010211814.i386 NetworkManager-openvpn.i686 1:0.8.1-1.fc14 @anaconda-InstallationRepo-201010211814.i386 NetworkManager-pptp.i686 1:0.8.1-1.fc14 @anaconda-InstallationRepo-201010211814.i386 NetworkManager-vpnc.i686 1:0.8.1-1.fc14 @anaconda-InstallationRepo-201010211814.i386 knetworkmanager is not installed. I am trying to set it up both with and without a network manager. Network manager never has worked properly for me (in KDE). When setting it up manually, I am using managed mode and specifying the network ID. Any ideas ? What has changed recently with regards to wireless ? Thanks ! -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
Re: My wireless connection quit. (F14/ 2.6.35/ Intel 4965 )
The laptop is not seeing any available networks in network manager. The Windows computers in the house see 2, ours and our neighbor's. Even when I use the SSID for our wireless router, it won't connect, manually or with network manager. Is network manager somehow messing this up ? Thanks -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
How I got Firefox 29 to not be slow.
Hi people. I realize this isn't a Fedora issue per se but I thought that being a number of people running Fedora use FF, I'd share my experience here. I use FF as my main browser. My apologies to the Konqueror developers. I do a lot of online research and it isn't uncommon for me to have 10 FF instances running with over 50 webpages (tabs) open in total. Lately FF has been very slow. Probably since FF27, though at first I didn't pay much attention. Lately its been a huge annoyance. I tried everything to speed it up. Disabling disk caching, selectively disabling various flash options, changing the graphics backends, etc. All to no avail. Today I happened to stumble upon the solution to the problem. Out of frustration I installed Chrome and began to use it. In doing so I completely closed all the FF instances I had open. I've done this before, but for whatever reason, this time was different. I was using Chrome, doing some light browsing when I accidentally started a FF instance. When I did, I received a message stating that there was already a FF instance running. I aborted the startup. I ran a "ps aux | grep firefox" only to find a ghost firefox instance still running. I killed it. I then restarted FF, only to find that it is now peppy once again. I hope this helps someone. -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
Re: losing WiFi Access - prompted for password
I appear to have the same problem on one of my Fedora 20 machines. Was this ever solved ? On Thu, May 30, 2013 at 10:49 AM, Steven Stern < subscribed-li...@sterndata.com> wrote: > On 05/30/2013 11:41 AM, staticsafe wrote: > > On Thu, May 30, 2013 at 11:35:00AM -0500, Steven Stern wrote: > >> F18... > >> > >> Over the last few days, I'm getting prompted to re-enter my password for > >> my WiFi network. It's not the router because no other device on the > >> network seems to be having problems. > >> > >> Potential changes on my system include > >> > >> May 07 21:39:32 Updated: 1:wpa_supplicant-1.1-1.fc18.x86_64 > >> May 25 15:33:44 Installed: kernel-3.9.3-201.fc18.x86_64 > >> May 27 08:06:42 Updated: > >> 1:NetworkManager-glib-0.9.8.1-3.git20130514.fc18.x86_64 > >> May 27 08:06:47 Updated: > 1:NetworkManager-0.9.8.1-3.git20130514.fc18.x86_64 > >> May 27 08:06:53 Updated: > >> network-manager-applet-0.9.8.1-4.git20130514.fc18.x86_64 > >> > >> Given that this has really started the day before yesterday, I suspect > >> it has something to do with the NetworkManager update. Is anyone else > >> having this problem? > >> > >> (Please -- do not tell me to "dump the evil NetworkManager". I'm trying > >> to solve a problem here, not make some stand against the tide. Thanks.) > >> > > > > > Is there anything in the system logs? journalctl on Fedora IIRC. > > > > This stuff repeats until I reboot: > > May 27 20:14:49 sds-desk-2 kernel: [127649.968367] wlan0: AP > 00:18:e7:f7:50:2a changed bandwidth, new config is 2422 MHz, width 2 > (2432/0 MHz) > May 27 20:38:18 sds-desk-2 kernel: [129059.576420] wlan0: AP > 00:18:e7:f7:50:2a changed bandwidth, new config is 2422 MHz, width 1 > (2422/0 MHz) > May 27 20:38:18 sds-desk-2 kernel: [129059.576425] wlan0: AP > 00:18:e7:f7:50:2a changed bandwidth in a way we can't support - disconnect > May 27 20:38:18 sds-desk-2 kernel: [129059.628461] cfg80211: Calling > CRDA to update world regulatory domain > May 27 20:38:18 sds-desk-2 NetworkManager[822]: (wlan0): > supplicant interface state: completed -> disconnected > May 27 20:38:18 sds-desk-2 kernel: [129059.708167] cfg80211: World > regulatory domain updated: > May 27 20:38:18 sds-desk-2 kernel: [129059.708170] cfg80211: > (start_freq - end_freq @ bandwidth), (max_antenna_gain, max_eirp) > May 27 20:38:18 sds-desk-2 kernel: [129059.708171] cfg80211: (2402000 > KHz - 2472000 KHz @ 4 KHz), (300 mBi, 2000 mBm) > May 27 20:38:18 sds-desk-2 kernel: [129059.708173] cfg80211: (2457000 > KHz - 2482000 KHz @ 4 KHz), (300 mBi, 2000 mBm) > May 27 20:38:18 sds-desk-2 kernel: [129059.708174] cfg80211: (2474000 > KHz - 2494000 KHz @ 2 KHz), (300 mBi, 2000 mBm) > May 27 20:38:18 sds-desk-2 kernel: [129059.708175] cfg80211: (517 > KHz - 525 KHz @ 4 KHz), (300 mBi, 2000 mBm) > May 27 20:38:18 sds-desk-2 kernel: [129059.708176] cfg80211: (5735000 > KHz - 5835000 KHz @ 4 KHz), (300 mBi, 2000 mBm) > May 27 20:38:18 sds-desk-2 kernel: [129059.708186] cfg80211: Calling > CRDA for country: US > May 27 20:38:18 sds-desk-2 kernel: [129059.710473] cfg80211: Regulatory > domain changed to country: US > May 27 20:38:18 sds-desk-2 kernel: [129059.710476] cfg80211: > (start_freq - end_freq @ bandwidth), (max_antenna_gain, max_eirp) > May 27 20:38:18 sds-desk-2 kernel: [129059.710477] cfg80211: (2402000 > KHz - 2472000 KHz @ 4 KHz), (300 mBi, 2700 mBm) > May 27 20:38:18 sds-desk-2 kernel: [129059.710479] cfg80211: (517 > KHz - 525 KHz @ 4 KHz), (300 mBi, 1700 mBm) > May 27 20:38:18 sds-desk-2 kernel: [129059.710480] cfg80211: (525 > KHz - 533 KHz @ 4 KHz), (300 mBi, 2000 mBm) > May 27 20:38:18 sds-desk-2 kernel: [129059.710481] cfg80211: (549 > KHz - 560 KHz @ 4 KHz), (300 mBi, 2000 mBm) > May 27 20:38:18 sds-desk-2 kernel: [129059.710482] cfg80211: (565 > KHz - 571 KHz @ 4 KHz), (300 mBi, 2000 mBm) > May 27 20:38:18 sds-desk-2 kernel: [129059.710483] cfg80211: (5735000 > KHz - 5835000 KHz @ 4 KHz), (300 mBi, 3000 mBm) > May 27 20:38:18 sds-desk-2 kernel: [129059.710485] cfg80211: (5724 > KHz - 6372 KHz @ 216 KHz), (N/A, 4000 mBm) > May 27 20:38:18 sds-desk-2 NetworkManager[822]: (wlan0): > supplicant interface state: disconnected -> scanning > May 27 20:38:19 sds-desk-2 kernel: [129060.469210] wlan0: authenticate > with 00:18:e7:f7:50:2a > May 27 20:38:19 sds-desk-2 kernel: [129060.487024] wlan0: send auth to > 00:18:e7:f7:50:2a (try 1/3) > May 27 20:38:19 sds-desk-2 NetworkManager[822]: (wlan0): > supplicant interface state: scanning -> authenticating > May 27 20:38:19 sds-desk-2 kernel: [129060.488473] wlan0: authenticated > May 27 20:38:19 sds-desk-2 kernel: [129060.489482] wlan0: associate with > 00:18:e7:f7:50:2a (try 1/3) > May 27 20:38:19 sds-desk-2 kernel: [129060.493452] wlan0: RX AssocResp > from 00:18:e7:f7:50:2a (capab=0x431 status=0 aid=1) > May 27 20:38:19 sds-desk-2 NetworkManager[822]: (wlan0): > supplicant interface
F22/23 + nvidia = no boot...
I know that the nvidia driver is proprietary software. Neither F22 nor F23 will boot on my laptop with kernels from the last week or so and the latest nvidia driver. When I attempt these kernel/driver combinations, it stops on the console screen which then begins flashing about once per second. My laptop boots normally if I use the nouveau driver. Does anyone know the cause or a work around for this situation ? Thanks -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
Re: F22/23 + nvidia = no boot...
I'm using akmod. On Fri, Oct 2, 2015 at 12:55 PM, birger wrote: > How did you install the nvidia drivers? Manually or did you use the > rpmfusion packages. For rpmfusion, did you use kmod-nvidia or akmod-nvidia? > > I have a few systems running akmod-nvidia-304xx, and have no problems. > > linux guy : > > >I know that the nvidia driver is proprietary software. > > > >Neither F22 nor F23 will boot on my laptop with kernels from the last week > >or so and the latest nvidia driver. When I attempt these kernel/driver > >combinations, it stops on the console screen which then begins flashing > >about once per second. My laptop boots normally if I use the nouveau > >driver. > > > >Does anyone know the cause or a work around for this situation ? > > > >Thanks > > > >-- > >users mailing list > >users@lists.fedoraproject.org > >To unsubscribe or change subscription options: > >https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users > >Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct > >Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines > >Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org > -- > users mailing list > users@lists.fedoraproject.org > To unsubscribe or change subscription options: > https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users > Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct > Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines > Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org > -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
Re: F22/23 + nvidia = no boot...
I bet this is my problem. I'll check tomorrow and report back. On Fri, Oct 2, 2015 at 4:03 PM, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote: > On Fri, 2015-10-02 at 14:50 -0400, Fred Smith wrote: > > On Fri, Oct 02, 2015 at 12:35:04PM -0600, linux guy wrote: > > >I know that the nvidia driver is proprietary software. > > >Neither F22 nor F23 will boot on my laptop with kernels from the > > > last > > >week or so and the latest nvidia driver. When I attempt these > > >kernel/driver combinations, it stops on the console screen which > > > then > > >begins flashing about once per second. My laptop boots > > > normally if I > > >use the nouveau driver. > > >Does anyone know the cause or a work around for this situation ? > > > > I'm FAR from an expert, but my GUESS would be that the Nvidia driver > > doesn't yet support the newest kernels. One would hope that they will > > catch up (soon), so I think either using the last kernel with which > > it > > works, or suffer with Nouveau for a while, until they catch up. > > Using 4.1.7-200 with the Nvidia driver and the akmod package with no > problems. Make sure that akmod has run correctly and terminated without > error before rebooting as there can be a race condition with dnf. See > the thread starting at > https://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/users/2015-August/464224.html > > poc > -- > users mailing list > users@lists.fedoraproject.org > To unsubscribe or change subscription options: > https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users > Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct > Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines > Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org > -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
Re: F22/23 + nvidia = no boot...
I uninstalled nouveau. Didn't know I had to go so far as to black list it. Where does one do that in F23 ? On Fri, Oct 2, 2015 at 1:20 PM, Joshua Doll wrote: > > > On Fri, Oct 2, 2015 at 2:35 PM linux guy wrote: > >> I know that the nvidia driver is proprietary software. >> >> Neither F22 nor F23 will boot on my laptop with kernels from the last >> week or so and the latest nvidia driver. When I attempt these >> kernel/driver combinations, it stops on the console screen which then >> begins flashing about once per second. My laptop boots normally if I use >> the nouveau driver. >> >> Does anyone know the cause or a work around for this situation ? >> >> Thanks >> -- >> users mailing list >> users@lists.fedoraproject.org >> To unsubscribe or change subscription options: >> https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users >> Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct >> Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines >> Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org >> > > Did you remember to blacklist the nouveau driver from being loaded? > > --Joshua D Doll > > -- > users mailing list > users@lists.fedoraproject.org > To unsubscribe or change subscription options: > https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users > Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct > Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines > Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org > > -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
Re: F22/23 + nvidia = no boot...
What kernel/ nvidia driver combination is working for people right now ? Is there a kmod package that is working with the current kernels ? On Sat, Oct 3, 2015 at 5:59 AM, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote: > On Fri, 2015-10-02 at 21:10 -0600, linux guy wrote: > > I uninstalled nouveau. Didn't know I had to go so far as to black > > list it. > > > > Where does one do that in F23 ? > > If it's different from F22, better ask on the Test list. > > poc > -- > users mailing list > users@lists.fedoraproject.org > To unsubscribe or change subscription options: > https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users > Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct > Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines > Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org > -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
Re: F22/23 + nvidia = no boot...
I've got another thing that is bothering me. When I boot, grub isn't displaying all the kernels I have installed. It is only showing me "Fedora" and something else. How do I get grub to display the available kernels ? On Mon, Oct 5, 2015 at 10:35 PM, linux guy wrote: > What kernel/ nvidia driver combination is working for people right now ? > Is there a kmod package that is working with the current kernels ? > > > > On Sat, Oct 3, 2015 at 5:59 AM, Patrick O'Callaghan > wrote: > >> On Fri, 2015-10-02 at 21:10 -0600, linux guy wrote: >> > I uninstalled nouveau. Didn't know I had to go so far as to black >> > list it. >> > >> > Where does one do that in F23 ? >> >> If it's different from F22, better ask on the Test list. >> >> poc >> -- >> users mailing list >> users@lists.fedoraproject.org >> To unsubscribe or change subscription options: >> https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users >> Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct >> Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines >> Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org >> > > -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
Re: F22/23 + nvidia = no boot...
FWIW, on my computer (F23) dnf is showing kernels 4.2.1-300 and 4.2.2-300. I don't have 4.1.7 installed or available. The log file in /var/cache/akmods/nvidia/ says that nvidia 346.72-2.1 for kernel 4.2.2-300 was verified and installed correctly, without errors. So I should have a working and installed nvidia driver for the most current kernel. My computer boots fine with nouveau, but I still get the blinking screen with the akmod nvidia driver. Sorry for the multiple, rapid fire posts. -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
Re: F22/23 + nvidia = no boot...
Another question... is there a better repository than rpmfusion-rawhide for getting akmod-f23 from ? On Mon, Oct 5, 2015 at 10:45 PM, linux guy wrote: > FWIW, on my computer (F23) dnf is showing kernels 4.2.1-300 and > 4.2.2-300. I don't have 4.1.7 installed or available. > > The log file in /var/cache/akmods/nvidia/ says that nvidia 346.72-2.1 for > kernel 4.2.2-300 was verified and installed correctly, without errors. So > I should have a working and installed nvidia driver for the most current > kernel. > > My computer boots fine with nouveau, but I still get the blinking screen > with the akmod nvidia driver. > > Sorry for the multiple, rapid fire posts. > > -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
Re: F22/23 + nvidia = no boot...
lspci says my laptop has an NVIDIA GF116M [GeForce GT 555M/635M] rev a1 http://www.geforce.com/hardware/notebook-gpus/geforce-gt-555m/features My laptop is only a few years old. Seems funny the video card wouldn't be supported by the nvidia driver. On Tue, Oct 6, 2015 at 6:31 AM, Ed Greshko wrote: > On 10/06/2015 06:23 PM, Timothy Murphy wrote: > > linux guy wrote: > > > >> What kernel/ nvidia driver combination is working for people right now ? > >> Is there a kmod package that is working with the current kernels ? > > Is the nvidia driver likely to be better than nouveau? > > > > Incidentally, where do you find nvidia drivers? > > I can't find one for my chip, NVIDIA Quadro NVS 140M > > at <http://www.nvidia.com/download/index.aspx>. > > > > The standard nouveau driver I am using with F23beta is not perfect > > (eg some web-pages are distorted) but just about passable. > > > > From the nVidia README file of the linux drivers. > > The 340.xx driver supports the following set of GPUs: > > NVIDIA GPU productDevice PCI ID*VDPAU features > GeForce 8800 GTX0191- > GeForce 8800 GTS0193- > GeForce 8800 Ultra0194- > Tesla C8700197- > Quadro FX 5600019D- > Quadro FX 4600019E- > GeForce 8600 GTS0400A > GeForce 8600 GT0401A > GeForce 8600 GT0402A > GeForce 8600 GS0403A > GeForce 8400 GS0404A > GeForce 9500M GS0405A > GeForce 8300 GS0406- > GeForce 8600M GT0407A > GeForce 9650M GS0408A > GeForce 8700M GT0409A > Quadro FX 370040AA > Quadro NVS 320M040BA > Quadro FX 570M040CA > Quadro FX 1600M040DA > Quadro FX 570040EA > Quadro FX 1700040FA > GeForce GT 3300410A > GeForce 8400 SE0420- > GeForce 8500 GT0421A > GeForce 8400 GS0422A > GeForce 8300 GS0423- > GeForce 8400 GS0424A > GeForce 8600M GS0425A > GeForce 8400M GT0426A > GeForce 8400M GS0427A > GeForce 8400M G0428A > Quadro NVS 140M0429A > Quadro NVS 130M042AA > Quadro NVS 135M042BA > > -- > In reality, some people should stick to running Windows and others should > stay away from computers altogether. > -- > users mailing list > users@lists.fedoraproject.org > To unsubscribe or change subscription options: > https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users > Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct > Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines > Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org > -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
Re: F22/23 + nvidia = no boot...
This page says that the GT555M is supported in the latest nvidia drivers. (See the supported products tab.) http://www.nvidia.com/Download/driverResults.aspx/90279/en-us On Tue, Oct 6, 2015 at 8:32 AM, linux guy wrote: > lspci says my laptop has an NVIDIA GF116M [GeForce GT 555M/635M] rev a1 > > http://www.geforce.com/hardware/notebook-gpus/geforce-gt-555m/features > > My laptop is only a few years old. Seems funny the video card wouldn't be > supported by the nvidia driver. > > On Tue, Oct 6, 2015 at 6:31 AM, Ed Greshko wrote: > >> On 10/06/2015 06:23 PM, Timothy Murphy wrote: >> > linux guy wrote: >> > >> >> What kernel/ nvidia driver combination is working for people right now >> ? >> >> Is there a kmod package that is working with the current kernels ? >> > Is the nvidia driver likely to be better than nouveau? >> > >> > Incidentally, where do you find nvidia drivers? >> > I can't find one for my chip, NVIDIA Quadro NVS 140M >> > at <http://www.nvidia.com/download/index.aspx>. >> > >> > The standard nouveau driver I am using with F23beta is not perfect >> > (eg some web-pages are distorted) but just about passable. >> > >> >> From the nVidia README file of the linux drivers. >> >> The 340.xx driver supports the following set of GPUs: >> >> NVIDIA GPU productDevice PCI ID*VDPAU features >> GeForce 8800 GTX0191- >> GeForce 8800 GTS0193- >> GeForce 8800 Ultra0194- >> Tesla C8700197- >> Quadro FX 5600019D- >> Quadro FX 4600019E- >> GeForce 8600 GTS0400A >> GeForce 8600 GT0401A >> GeForce 8600 GT0402A >> GeForce 8600 GS0403A >> GeForce 8400 GS0404A >> GeForce 9500M GS0405A >> GeForce 8300 GS0406- >> GeForce 8600M GT0407A >> GeForce 9650M GS0408A >> GeForce 8700M GT0409A >> Quadro FX 370040AA >> Quadro NVS 320M040BA >> Quadro FX 570M040CA >> Quadro FX 1600M040DA >> Quadro FX 570040EA >> Quadro FX 1700040FA >> GeForce GT 3300410A >> GeForce 8400 SE0420- >> GeForce 8500 GT0421A >> GeForce 8400 GS0422A >> GeForce 8300 GS0423- >> GeForce 8400 GS0424A >> GeForce 8600M GS0425A >> GeForce 8400M GT0426A >> GeForce 8400M GS0427A >> GeForce 8400M G0428A >> Quadro NVS 140M0429A >> Quadro NVS 130M042AA >> Quadro NVS 135M042BA >> >> -- >> In reality, some people should stick to running Windows and others should >> stay away from computers altogether. >> -- >> users mailing list >> users@lists.fedoraproject.org >> To unsubscribe or change subscription options: >> https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users >> Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct >> Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines >> Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org >> > > -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
Re: F22/23 + nvidia = no boot...
THE nvidia driver I speak of is 352-41. Here is a copy and paste of the supported hardware list for that version of the driver. Both the GT555M and the GT635M are in the list. Source: http://www.nvidia.com/Download/driverResults.aspx/90279/en-us *GeForce 900 Series:* GeForce GTX TITAN X, GeForce GTX 980 Ti, GeForce GTX 980, GeForce GTX 970, GeForce GTX 960, GeForce GTX 950 *GeForce 900M Series (Notebooks):* GeForce GTX 980M, GeForce GTX 970M, GeForce GTX 965M, GeForce GTX 960M, GeForce GTX 950M, GeForce 940M, GeForce 930M, GeForce 920M, GeForce 910M *GeForce 800M Series (Notebooks):* GeForce GTX 880M, GeForce GTX 870M, GeForce GTX 860M, GeForce GTX 850M, GeForce 840M, GeForce 830M, GeForce 820M, GeForce 810M *GeForce 700 Series:* GeForce GTX TITAN Z, GeForce GTX TITAN Black, GeForce GTX TITAN, GeForce GTX 780 Ti, GeForce GTX 780, GeForce GTX 770, GeForce GTX 760, GeForce GTX 760 Ti (OEM), GeForce GTX 750 Ti, GeForce GTX 750, GeForce GTX 745, GeForce GT 740, GeForce GT 730, GeForce GT 720, GeForce GT 710, GeForce GT 705 *GeForce 700M Series (Notebooks):* GeForce GTX 780M, GeForce GTX 770M, GeForce GTX 765M, GeForce GTX 760M, GeForce GT 755M, GeForce GT 750M, GeForce GT 745M, GeForce GT 740M, GeForce GT 735M, GeForce GT 730M, GeForce GT 720M, GeForce 710M *GeForce 600 Series:* GeForce GTX 690, GeForce GTX 680, GeForce GTX 670, GeForce GTX 660 Ti, GeForce GTX 660, GeForce GTX 650 Ti BOOST, GeForce GTX 650 Ti, GeForce GTX 650, GeForce GTX 645, GeForce GT 645, GeForce GT 640, GeForce GT 630, GeForce GT 620, GeForce GT 610, GeForce 605 *GeForce 600M Series (Notebooks):* GeForce GTX 680MX, GeForce GTX 680M, GeForce GTX 675MX, GeForce GTX 675M, GeForce GTX 670MX, GeForce GTX 670M, GeForce GTX 660M, GeForce GT 650M, GeForce GT 645M, GeForce GT 640M, GeForce GT 640M LE, GeForce GT 635M, GeForce GT 630M, GeForce GT 625M, GeForce GT 620M, GeForce 610M *GeForce 500 Series:* GeForce GTX 590, GeForce GTX 580, GeForce GTX 570, GeForce GTX 560 Ti, GeForce GTX 560 SE, GeForce GTX 560, GeForce GTX 555, GeForce GTX 550 Ti, GeForce GT 545, GeForce GT 530, GeForce GT 520, GeForce 510 *GeForce 500M Series (Notebooks):* GeForce GTX 580M, GeForce GTX 570M, GeForce GTX 560M, GeForce GT 555M, GeForce GT 550M, GeForce GT 540M, GeForce GT 525M, GeForce GT 520M *GeForce 400 Series:* GeForce GTX 480, GeForce GTX 470, GeForce GTX 465, GeForce GTX 460 SE v2, GeForce GTX 460 SE, GeForce GTX 460, GeForce GTS 450, GeForce GT 440, GeForce GT 430, GeForce GT 420 *GeForce 400M Series (Notebooks):* GeForce GTX 485M, GeForce GTX 480M, GeForce GTX 470M, GeForce GTX 460M, GeForce GT 445M, GeForce GT 435M, GeForce GT 425M, GeForce GT 420M, GeForce GT 415M, GeForce 410M, GeForce 405M *Quadro Series:* Quadro M6000, Quadro M5000, Quadro M4000, Quadro K6000, Quadro K5200, Quadro K5000, Quadro K4000, Quadro K4200, Quadro K2200, Quadro K2000, Quadro K2000D, Quadro K1200, Quadro K620, Quadro K600, Quadro K420, Quadro 6000, Quadro 5000, Quadro 4000, Quadro 2000, Quadro 2000D, Quadro 600, Quadro 410 *Quadro Series (Notebooks):* Quadro K5100M, Quadro K5000M, Quadro K4100M, Quadro K4000M, Quadro K3100M, Quadro K2200M, Quadro K2100M, Quadro K3000M, Quadro K2000M, Quadro K1100M, Quadro K1000M, Quadro K620M, Quadro K610M, Quadro K510M, Quadro K500M, Quadro 5010M, Quadro 5000M, Quadro 4000M, Quadro 3000M, Quadro 2000M *Quadro NVS Series:* NVS 510, NVS 315, NVS 310 *Quadro NVS Series (Notebooks):* NVS 5400M, NVS 5200M, NVS 4200M *Quadro Plex Series:* Quadro Plex 7000 *Quadro Sync Series:* Quadro Sync, Quadro G-Sync II *Quadro SDI:* Quadro SDI *GRID Series:* GRID K2, GRID K520, GRID K1, GRID K340 *NVS Series:* NVS 510, NVS 315, NVS 310 *NVS Series (Notebooks):*NVS 5400M, NVS 5200M, NVS 4200M On Tue, Oct 6, 2015 at 9:02 AM, John Pilkington wrote: > On 06/10/15 15:32, linux guy wrote: > >> lspci says my laptop has an NVIDIA GF116M [GeForce GT 555M/635M] rev a1 >> >> http://www.geforce.com/hardware/notebook-gpus/geforce-gt-555m/features >> >> My laptop is only a few years old. Seems funny the video card wouldn't >> be supported by the nvidia driver. >> > > There's a lot of talk on this list about THE nvidia driver. > > There are many of them and they claim to support different chipsets. > Here's the 'legacy' list. I believe rpmfusion provides most of them. > > http://www.nvidia.com/object/IO_32667.html > > > -- > users mailing list > users@lists.fedoraproject.org > To unsubscribe or change subscription options: > https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users > Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct > Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines > Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org > -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Fed
Displaying all the available kernels at boot ?
My computer is not displaying all the available kernels when it boots. Right now it displays Fedora, Advanced options for Fedora and tboot 1.81. How do I get it to display a list of kernels ? -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
Re: F22/23 + nvidia = no boot...
Here is an image of the console when it stops booting. https://picasaweb.google.com/lh/photo/2lIvcIc9OsOgSAK0_VhtrFve0uk252X7hjsY_3ZXvi8?feat=directlink I have posted this issue to the test mailing list as well. On Tue, Oct 6, 2015 at 9:08 AM, linux guy wrote: > THE nvidia driver I speak of is 352-41. > > Here is a copy and paste of the supported hardware list for that version > of the driver. Both the GT555M and the GT635M are in the list. > > Source: http://www.nvidia.com/Download/driverResults.aspx/90279/en-us > > *GeForce 900 Series:* > > GeForce GTX TITAN X, GeForce GTX 980 Ti, GeForce GTX 980, GeForce GTX 970, > GeForce GTX 960, GeForce GTX 950 > *GeForce 900M Series (Notebooks):* > > GeForce GTX 980M, GeForce GTX 970M, GeForce GTX 965M, GeForce GTX 960M, > GeForce GTX 950M, GeForce 940M, GeForce 930M, GeForce 920M, GeForce 910M > *GeForce 800M Series (Notebooks):* > > GeForce GTX 880M, GeForce GTX 870M, GeForce GTX 860M, GeForce GTX 850M, > GeForce 840M, GeForce 830M, GeForce 820M, GeForce 810M > *GeForce 700 Series:* > > GeForce GTX TITAN Z, GeForce GTX TITAN Black, GeForce GTX TITAN, GeForce > GTX 780 Ti, GeForce GTX 780, GeForce GTX 770, GeForce GTX 760, GeForce GTX > 760 Ti (OEM), GeForce GTX 750 Ti, GeForce GTX 750, GeForce GTX 745, GeForce > GT 740, GeForce GT 730, GeForce GT 720, GeForce GT 710, GeForce GT 705 > *GeForce 700M Series (Notebooks):* > > GeForce GTX 780M, GeForce GTX 770M, GeForce GTX 765M, GeForce GTX 760M, > GeForce GT 755M, GeForce GT 750M, GeForce GT 745M, GeForce GT 740M, GeForce > GT 735M, GeForce GT 730M, GeForce GT 720M, GeForce 710M > *GeForce 600 Series:* > > GeForce GTX 690, GeForce GTX 680, GeForce GTX 670, GeForce GTX 660 Ti, > GeForce GTX 660, GeForce GTX 650 Ti BOOST, GeForce GTX 650 Ti, GeForce GTX > 650, GeForce GTX 645, GeForce GT 645, GeForce GT 640, GeForce GT 630, > GeForce GT 620, GeForce GT 610, GeForce 605 > *GeForce 600M Series (Notebooks):* > > GeForce GTX 680MX, GeForce GTX 680M, GeForce GTX 675MX, GeForce GTX 675M, > GeForce GTX 670MX, GeForce GTX 670M, GeForce GTX 660M, GeForce GT 650M, > GeForce GT 645M, GeForce GT 640M, GeForce GT 640M LE, GeForce GT 635M, > GeForce GT 630M, GeForce GT 625M, GeForce GT 620M, GeForce 610M > *GeForce 500 Series:* > > GeForce GTX 590, GeForce GTX 580, GeForce GTX 570, GeForce GTX 560 Ti, > GeForce GTX 560 SE, GeForce GTX 560, GeForce GTX 555, GeForce GTX 550 Ti, > GeForce GT 545, GeForce GT 530, GeForce GT 520, GeForce 510 > *GeForce 500M Series (Notebooks):* > > GeForce GTX 580M, GeForce GTX 570M, GeForce GTX 560M, GeForce GT 555M, > GeForce GT 550M, GeForce GT 540M, GeForce GT 525M, GeForce GT 520M > *GeForce 400 Series:* > > GeForce GTX 480, GeForce GTX 470, GeForce GTX 465, GeForce GTX 460 SE v2, > GeForce GTX 460 SE, GeForce GTX 460, GeForce GTS 450, GeForce GT 440, > GeForce GT 430, GeForce GT 420 > *GeForce 400M Series (Notebooks):* > > GeForce GTX 485M, GeForce GTX 480M, GeForce GTX 470M, GeForce GTX 460M, > GeForce GT 445M, GeForce GT 435M, GeForce GT 425M, GeForce GT 420M, GeForce > GT 415M, GeForce 410M, GeForce 405M > *Quadro Series:* > > Quadro M6000, Quadro M5000, Quadro M4000, Quadro K6000, Quadro K5200, > Quadro K5000, Quadro K4000, Quadro K4200, Quadro K2200, Quadro K2000, > Quadro K2000D, Quadro K1200, Quadro K620, Quadro K600, Quadro K420, Quadro > 6000, Quadro 5000, Quadro 4000, Quadro 2000, Quadro 2000D, Quadro 600, > Quadro 410 > *Quadro Series (Notebooks):* > > Quadro K5100M, Quadro K5000M, Quadro K4100M, Quadro K4000M, Quadro K3100M, > Quadro K2200M, Quadro K2100M, Quadro K3000M, Quadro K2000M, Quadro K1100M, > Quadro K1000M, Quadro K620M, Quadro K610M, Quadro K510M, Quadro K500M, > Quadro 5010M, Quadro 5000M, Quadro 4000M, Quadro 3000M, Quadro 2000M > *Quadro NVS Series:* > > NVS 510, NVS 315, NVS 310 > *Quadro NVS Series (Notebooks):* > > NVS 5400M, NVS 5200M, NVS 4200M > *Quadro Plex Series:* > > Quadro Plex 7000 > *Quadro Sync Series:* > > Quadro Sync, Quadro G-Sync II > *Quadro SDI:* > > Quadro SDI > *GRID Series:* > > GRID K2, GRID K520, GRID K1, GRID K340 > *NVS Series:* > > NVS 510, NVS 315, NVS 310 > *NVS Series (Notebooks):*NVS 5400M, NVS 5200M, NVS 4200M > > On Tue, Oct 6, 2015 at 9:02 AM, John Pilkington wrote: > >> On 06/10/15 15:32, linux guy wrote: >> >>> lspci says my laptop has an NVIDIA GF116M [GeForce GT 555M/635M] rev a1 >>> >>> http://www.geforce.com/hardware/notebook-gpus/geforce-gt-555m/features >>> >>> My laptop is only a few years old. Seems funny the video card wouldn't >>> be supported by the nvidia driver. >>> >> >> There's a lot of talk on this list about THE nvidia dri
Re: Displaying all the available kernels at boot ?
Thanks. On Tue, Oct 6, 2015 at 9:40 AM, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote: > On Tue, 2015-10-06 at 09:11 -0600, linux guy wrote: > > My computer is not displaying all the available kernels when it > > boots. > > > > Right now it displays Fedora, Advanced options for Fedora and tboot > > 1.81. > > > > How do I get it to display a list of kernels ? > > Take a look at /boot/grub2/grub.cfg. If some kernels are missing, it's > likely they were incompletely installed. > > poc > -- > users mailing list > users@lists.fedoraproject.org > To unsubscribe or change subscription options: > https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users > Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct > Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines > Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org > -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
Peer to peer adhoc network setup using network manager. ARP, gateways and routes...
I need to connect a wifi device to my Linux computer. There is no router in between the two. Just my computer and the device. The device has a fixed IP, 192.168.0.10. It has its own Wifi interface built in It isn't capable of connecting to a router. It has a fixed IP address. My home wifi network uses 192.168.1.x. It has a router. It works fine. My computer connects to it via its built in wifi interface. I have added a USB wifi interface (dongle) to my computer to connect to the device. My computer displays the device properly in a network manager scan. So the device is available for connections. Next I edit the connection for the device in network manager. The SSID is filled in from the scan. I select Ad-hoc mode. Band, Channel, etc. are all automatic. Next I edit wifi security. The device is open security wise, so I select None. Next I edit the IPV4 tab. Under connection method I select Manual. The next fields are DNS server and Search Domains. In a point to point connection, there will be no DNS server. I leave the boxes blank. Next up is adding the static IP address, netmask and gateway. I set the address of my interface to be 192.168.0.123, because it was recommended by another user who connected with an Apple device. I set netmask to 255.255.255.0. The next thing to set is the gateway address. Here is where I get confused. What is a gateway in the context of a peer to peer connection ? I try to leave it blank, but it won't let me. So I put in 0.0.0.0. I also tried the address of the interface (192.168.0.123) and the address of the device (192.168.0.10) Then there is a route field. I add a route for the ip address 192.168.0.10, using a netmask of 255.255.255.0 and again it asks for a gateway. I tried 0.0.0.0, the device address and the interface address. I don't touch any of the IPV6 settings because the device doesn't support IPV6 addresses. I save everything and connect to the device successfully. I run "arp -a" and the device is found connected to the interface. Yippee ! Pinging the device fails. Destination Host Unreachable. When I ping the device and watch in wireshark I see an ARP broadcast message "Who has 192.168.0.10 ? Tell 192.168.0.123". 192.168.0.123 is the static IP for the interface. And that is as far as the process gets. When I watch the other interface and do a ping to a local device, I see the same ARP broadcast message, but also a reply message to it. 192.168.1.142 is at And then the process continues successfully. So what am I missing in the setup of my adhoc connection such that the OS knows that a message sent to my device (192.168.0.10) gets routed through the USB wifi interface, ie the ARP broadcast message gets a reply ? Thanks. -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
Re: Peer to peer adhoc network setup using network manager. ARP, gateways and routes...
I figured out the problem. The gateway addresses need to be empty. If you delete the entry and create a new one you can use an empty gateway address. If you have an address in the field, including 0.0.0.0, you cannot save an empty gateway address. On Tue, Oct 6, 2015 at 5:56 PM, linux guy wrote: > I need to connect a wifi device to my Linux computer. There is no router > in between the two. Just my computer and the device. The device has a fixed > IP, 192.168.0.10. It has its own Wifi interface built in It isn't capable > of connecting to a router. It has a fixed IP address. > > My home wifi network uses 192.168.1.x. It has a router. It works fine. My > computer connects to it via its built in wifi interface. > > I have added a USB wifi interface (dongle) to my computer to connect to > the device. My computer displays the device properly in a network manager > scan. So the device is available for connections. > > Next I edit the connection for the device in network manager. The SSID is > filled in from the scan. I select Ad-hoc mode. Band, Channel, etc. are all > automatic. > > Next I edit wifi security. The device is open security wise, so I select > None. > > Next I edit the IPV4 tab. Under connection method I select Manual. > > The next fields are DNS server and Search Domains. In a point to point > connection, there will be no DNS server. I leave the boxes blank. > > Next up is adding the static IP address, netmask and gateway. > > I set the address of my interface to be 192.168.0.123, because it was > recommended by another user who connected with an Apple device. I set > netmask to 255.255.255.0. > > The next thing to set is the gateway address. Here is where I get > confused. What is a gateway in the context of a peer to peer connection ? > I try to leave it blank, but it won't let me. So I put in 0.0.0.0. I > also tried the address of the interface (192.168.0.123) and the address of > the device (192.168.0.10) > > Then there is a route field. I add a route for the ip address > 192.168.0.10, using a netmask of 255.255.255.0 and again it asks for a > gateway. I tried 0.0.0.0, the device address and the interface address. > > I don't touch any of the IPV6 settings because the device doesn't support > IPV6 addresses. > > I save everything and connect to the device successfully. > > I run "arp -a" and the device is found connected to the interface. Yippee > ! > > Pinging the device fails. Destination Host Unreachable. > > When I ping the device and watch in wireshark I see an ARP broadcast > message "Who has 192.168.0.10 ? Tell 192.168.0.123". 192.168.0.123 is the > static IP for the interface. And that is as far as the process gets. > > When I watch the other interface and do a ping to a local device, I see > the same ARP broadcast message, but also a reply message to it. > 192.168.1.142 is at And then the process continues > successfully. > > So what am I missing in the setup of my adhoc connection such that the OS > knows that a message sent to my device (192.168.0.10) gets routed through > the USB wifi interface, ie the ARP broadcast message gets a reply ? > > Thanks. > > > -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
Re: [F25, KDE] very very slow internet connexion
In case this helps. From my RPi: # ping www.google.com PING www.google.com (172.217.1.36) 56(84) bytes of data. 64 bytes from ord37s07-in-f36.1e100.net (172.217.1.36): icmp_seq=1 ttl=56 time=51.5 ms 64 bytes from ord37s07-in-f36.1e100.net (172.217.1.36): icmp_seq=2 ttl=56 time=51.9 ms 64 bytes from ord37s07-in-f36.1e100.net (172.217.1.36): icmp_seq=3 ttl=56 time=71.4 ms 64 bytes from ord37s07-in-f36.1e100.net (172.217.1.36): icmp_seq=4 ttl=56 time=54.0 ms 64 bytes from ord37s07-in-f36.1e100.net (172.217.1.36): icmp_seq=5 ttl=56 time=53.0 ms 64 bytes from ord37s07-in-f36.1e100.net (172.217.1.36): icmp_seq=6 ttl=56 time=53.4 ms 64 bytes from ord37s07-in-f36.1e100.net (172.217.1.36): icmp_seq=7 ttl=56 time=50.0 ms 64 bytes from ord37s07-in-f36.1e100.net (172.217.1.36): icmp_seq=8 ttl=56 time=56.8 ms --- www.google.com ping statistics --- 8 packets transmitted, 8 received, 0% packet loss, time 7008ms rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 50.072/55.293/71.494/6.409 ms >From my i7 workstation: $ ping www.google.com PING www.google.com (216.58.216.100) 56(84) bytes of data. 64 bytes from ord30s22-in-f4.1e100.net (216.58.216.100): icmp_seq=1 ttl=56 time=62.0 ms 64 bytes from ord30s22-in-f4.1e100.net (216.58.216.100): icmp_seq=2 ttl=56 time=65.4 ms 64 bytes from ord30s22-in-f4.1e100.net (216.58.216.100): icmp_seq=3 ttl=56 time=62.4 ms 64 bytes from ord30s22-in-f4.1e100.net (216.58.216.100): icmp_seq=4 ttl=56 time=65.8 ms 64 bytes from ord30s22-in-f4.1e100.net (216.58.216.100): icmp_seq=5 ttl=56 time=62.0 ms 64 bytes from ord30s22-in-f4.1e100.net (216.58.216.100): icmp_seq=6 ttl=56 time=65.9 ms 64 bytes from ord30s22-in-f4.1e100.net (216.58.216.100): icmp_seq=7 ttl=56 time=63.3 ms ^C --- www.google.com ping statistics --- 7 packets transmitted, 7 received, 0% packet loss, time 6008ms rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 62.063/63.879/65.987/1.687 ms My Rpi pings faster than my workstation. Both wireless, same router, etc. Caveat: I'm using a USB Wifi dongle on the RPi. ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: [F25, KDE] very very slow internet connexion
Sorry, wrong list... I thought this was an RPi related issue. ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: [F25, KDE] very very slow internet connexion
RPi: # ping 172.217.1.36 PING 172.217.1.36 (172.217.1.36) 56(84) bytes of data. 64 bytes from 172.217.1.36: icmp_seq=1 ttl=56 time=50.8 ms 64 bytes from 172.217.1.36: icmp_seq=2 ttl=56 time=54.9 ms 64 bytes from 172.217.1.36: icmp_seq=3 ttl=56 time=66.2 ms 64 bytes from 172.217.1.36: icmp_seq=4 ttl=56 time=55.6 ms 64 bytes from 172.217.1.36: icmp_seq=5 ttl=56 time=55.1 ms 64 bytes from 172.217.1.36: icmp_seq=6 ttl=56 time=52.5 ms 64 bytes from 172.217.1.36: icmp_seq=7 ttl=56 time=53.1 ms 64 bytes from 172.217.1.36: icmp_seq=8 ttl=56 time=52.8 ms 64 bytes from 172.217.1.36: icmp_seq=9 ttl=56 time=62.8 ms ^C --- 172.217.1.36 ping statistics --- 9 packets transmitted, 9 received, 0% packet loss, time 8010ms rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 50.805/56.025/66.264/4.846 ms i7 Workstation: $ ping 172.217.1.36 PING 172.217.1.36 (172.217.1.36) 56(84) bytes of data. 64 bytes from 172.217.1.36: icmp_seq=1 ttl=56 time=146 ms 64 bytes from 172.217.1.36: icmp_seq=2 ttl=56 time=66.8 ms 64 bytes from 172.217.1.36: icmp_seq=3 ttl=56 time=55.1 ms 64 bytes from 172.217.1.36: icmp_seq=4 ttl=56 time=52.3 ms 64 bytes from 172.217.1.36: icmp_seq=5 ttl=56 time=134 ms 64 bytes from 172.217.1.36: icmp_seq=6 ttl=56 time=156 ms 64 bytes from 172.217.1.36: icmp_seq=7 ttl=56 time=96.0 ms 64 bytes from 172.217.1.36: icmp_seq=8 ttl=56 time=52.9 ms 64 bytes from 172.217.1.36: icmp_seq=9 ttl=56 time=60.2 ms 64 bytes from 172.217.1.36: icmp_seq=10 ttl=56 time=63.8 ms ^C --- 172.217.1.36 ping statistics --- 10 packets transmitted, 10 received, 0% packet loss, time 9012ms rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 52.344/88.498/156.517/39.663 ms RPi is running console only. Workstation running KDE and several apps open. ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: [F25, KDE] very very slow internet connexion
Install an ad blocker and flash blocker. Block everything and then slowly allow things one at a time. I find firefox pretty intolerant of "bad" scripts compared to Chrome. ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Linux based car PC "front end" ?
I'm looking for a good Linux based car pc "front end" application. Does anyone know of one ? Something like Centrafuse, but OS and Linux based ? Does anyone know of one for (gulp) Android ? Thanks -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
Re: Linux based car PC "front end" ?
The linux (and winCE) versions are no longer supported and may not install correctly due to issues with the repository servers. http://forums.fluxmedia.net/centrafuse-linux-beta/17903-repository-down-http-repo-centrafuse-com.html -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
rsync a cloned dual boot SSD drive for backup ? Catastrophic SSD future failure recovery ideas.
I recently suffered a surprise catastrophic failure of the SSD in my laptop. As per this article, they seem to be bit hit and miss or as the article puts it, they sometimes have an overwhelming Crazy/Hot ratio. http://www.codinghorror.com/blog/2011/05/the-hot-crazy-solid-state-drive-scale/comments/page/1/#comments Nevertheless, I feel like I'd like to try using the replacement SSD that Intel is sending me. Due to some decent planning and a bit of luck, I lost almost no data (ie/home/me) when my SSD failed. Everything else ((ie the OS) was a loss though. Reality is just beginning to set in as to how much work its going to be to set up a new drive with all the applications and settings that I used to have. I want to avoid this effort should I ever experience a drive failure again. Due to the need to run 2 Windows only applications, I need to have a dual boot setup. For future SSD failures, what options do I have for setting up a system that keeps a second, bootable copy of my SSD in sync with the SSD ? I don't mind losing a day or two's work. But this business of rebuilding the entire OS is painful. What I am looking for is a system whereby I always have a cloned version of the SSD ready to go should it fail. It needs to handle both the Windows and the Linux installs. Would something like rsync work on a regular hard drive clone of the SSD ? Could rsync handle the Windows 7 partition ? Thanks ! -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
