Email Question - OT
Hi All; This is probably Off Topic, apologies... I recently kicked googlemail to the curb in favor of a service that does not read my emails (fastmail). We are very happy with fastmail. We are using our own domain which I was also doing with google. All of our clients can now email me at the same email address as before and I get the emails via fastmail, however we have one client that I do not receive the emails for. They can email me at other addresses but not the 'migrated' address. I'm not sure how to even start debugging this... Any thoughts, ideas, suggestions would be much appreciated Thanks in advance ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: Email Question - OT
On 2/20/19 10:57 AM, William Oliver wrote: On Wed, 2019-02-20 at 10:16 -0700, S. Bob wrote: Hi All; This is probably Off Topic, apologies... I recently kicked googlemail to the curb in favor of a service that does not read my emails (fastmail). We are very happy with fastmail. We are using our own domain which I was also doing with google. All of our clients can now email me at the same email address as before and I get the emails via fastmail, however we have one client that I do not receive the emails for. They can email me at other addresses but not the 'migrated' address. I'm not sure how to even start debugging this... Any thoughts, ideas, suggestions would be much appreciated Thanks in advance This happened to me when I set up a mailinglist for a church group I belonged to. I ran a mail server I had in my home office that was hooked up to a cable service. Of the 50 people on the list, 20 could not send mail to the list -- even though they could receive mails. It turned out that all of them were using one cable vendor and were getting their internet connection through it. I tried calling them, but the technical support folk there said it was my problem and they were not interested in spending time trying to help me -- so I was on my own. I did a search on the problem at the time, and I wasn't the only person who ran into it. From my reading, it seemed that it was an issue of this particular ISP's internal security protocol that involved some sort of checking of ownership or something like that. The gist I got was that my domain resolved correctly, and the ICANN ownership info of the domain was correct, but the ownership of the some other component, like the IP address, was different, since it was tied to my ISP and not to me -- even though I was doing my own nameservice. Thus, I broke their spoofing rules. There was no solution that I could find, and none that worked for other folk who ran into it -- all of whom were running their own name and mail service from home. The workaround I ended up using was to change the Reply To: address for those users to a big-name server address (gmail as I remember) and then forwarded that to my server, which it would do. Note: 1) This was specific to one ISP (and the search turned it up only for that ISP) 2) It was back in 2008 3) I may not have characterized it correctly, since I didn't actually solve it. Sounds like the same behavior, Thanks billo ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org
Alienware M17 & Fedora - wireless card compatibility?
Hi all; I'm considering the purchase of an Alienware M17 to run Fedora on. Does anyone know if it's compatible with Fedora? Specifically the wifi card choices: I have 2 options: - Qualcomm QCA6174A 802.11ac 2x2 MU-MIMO WiFi and Bluetooth 4.2 or - Killer Wireless 1550 2x2 AC and Bluetooth 5.0 Thoughts? Thanks in advance ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org
how to get stoken?
Hi all; I have Fedora 29 running as my laptop, I can run dnf search stoken and it finds it, however if I create a new Fedora 29 VM dnf cannot find stoken. Anyone know what package / repo I need to install to get stoken? One odd thing is that dnf provides shows stoken (on my laptop) as coming from fedora.repo $ dnf provides stoken Last metadata expiration check: 5 days, 12:45:06 ago on Fri 12 Apr 2019 09:23:10 AM MDT. stoken-cli-0.91-6.fc29.x86_64 : Command line tool for stoken Repo : fedora Matched from: Filename : /usr/bin/stoken I visually compared the fedora.repo files on the laptop vs VM, they seem to be the same ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: how to get stoken?
Solved - User Error On 4/17/19 10:10 PM, S. Bob wrote: Hi all; I have Fedora 29 running as my laptop, I can run dnf search stoken and it finds it, however if I create a new Fedora 29 VM dnf cannot find stoken. Anyone know what package / repo I need to install to get stoken? One odd thing is that dnf provides shows stoken (on my laptop) as coming from fedora.repo $ dnf provides stoken Last metadata expiration check: 5 days, 12:45:06 ago on Fri 12 Apr 2019 09:23:10 AM MDT. stoken-cli-0.91-6.fc29.x86_64 : Command line tool for stoken Repo : fedora Matched from: Filename : /usr/bin/stoken I visually compared the fedora.repo files on the laptop vs VM, they seem to be the same ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org
New LG Gram 17, trying to boot Fedora live CD, won't boot
Hi All; I have a new LG Gram 17 laptop. Burned a Fedora 29 live CD, when I boot it hangs on these 2 messages: (1 of 2) A start job is running for Journal Service (2 of 2) A start job is running for for er-live\x2drw.device Eventually the Journal service fails then it starts over. Here are the Bios settings: USB Legacy Mode -- Enabled UEFI Boot -- Enabled Legacy OS Boot -- Enabled TPM -- Disabled Secure Boot -- Disabled The laptop will not boot off the live cd unless I have Legacy OS Boot enabled Thoughts? Can anyone help me debug this? ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org
install boot hangs, or has no mouse with noacpi
Installing Fedora 30, LG Gram 17 laptop if I use no boot parameters the install hangs after "Started Journal Service" If I use acpi=off it boots but I have no mouse once I get to the graphical screen, if I use noacpi I get the same behavior (no mouse). Thoughts? ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org
Boot & Bios Issues
Hi All; I've managed to install Fedora 30 on a new LG Gram 17 laptop. I had to set acpi=off to get the live cd to boot, then I had to remove the acpi=off and rebuild the EFI grub file so the trackpad would work, subsequent boots without the acpi=off seem to work fine. I am seeing an odd situation when I shutdown & restart: 1) shutdown often takes a long time, I see that stop jobs are running either for packagekit or sometimes "flush journal to persistent storage" 2) sometimes booting up takes a long time , indicating a start job is running - flush journal to persistent storage 3) If I ever do a hard power off then it boots to what seems to be a windows boot manager, showing several options, like this: 1. ATA HDD1: HFS512G39TNF-N3A0A 2. ATA HDD2: CT1000MX500SSD4 3. Windows Boot Manager Then I need to power off again and change the following bios settings, they always get changed when I hard power off: Legacy OS Boot - (Gets set to Disabled, Fedora won't boot unless this is set to Enabled) RTC Wakeup from S4 - (Gets set to Enabled, Fedora won't boot unless this is set to Disabled) SW Guard Extensions (SGX) - (Gets set to Enabled, Fedora won't boot unless this is set to Disabled) Sometimes I need to go into secure boot configuration and choose "Delete All Signatures" If I do a dnf update and get a new kernel then the above process is triggered as well Other than struggling with booting a bit the laptop works great with Fedora. Anyone have any insight on how to fix the above issues? Thanks in advance ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: Boot & Bios Issues
On 5/5/19 10:45 PM, Chris Murphy wrote: On Sun, May 5, 2019 at 1:41 PM S. Bob wrote: Hi All; I've managed to install Fedora 30 on a new LG Gram 17 laptop. I had to set acpi=off to get the live cd to boot, then I had to remove the acpi=off and rebuild the EFI grub file so the trackpad would work, subsequent boots without the acpi=off seem to work fine. I am seeing an odd situation when I shutdown & restart: 1) shutdown often takes a long time, I see that stop jobs are running either for packagekit or sometimes "flush journal to persistent storage" 2) sometimes booting up takes a long time , indicating a start job is running - flush journal to persistent storage Boot parameter 'systemd.debug-shell=1' will give you a very early shell on tty9, with root available without a password needed. Useful for troubleshooting but it's a security risk. Once you get the hang, you can switch to tty9 and do # systemctl list-jobs And see which ones are hanging. And then # systemctl status I can't think of a reason off hand why flushing the journal would take a while if this is a default installation. What do you get for: # cat /etc/fstab # blkid The tty9 console will be available for a while during shutdown as well, and you can do the same list-jobs check, and also get status. There are ways to get more verbose journal logging, but they are super verbose. 3) If I ever do a hard power off then it boots to what seems to be a windows boot manager, showing several options, like this: 1. ATA HDD1: HFS512G39TNF-N3A0A 2. ATA HDD2: CT1000MX500SSD4 3. Windows Boot Manager Then I need to power off again and change the following bios settings, they always get changed when I hard power off: Legacy OS Boot - (Gets set to Disabled, Fedora won't boot unless this is set to Enabled) If this is enabled at the time Fedora is installed, you will get an installation (a bootloader) that depends on it always being. But it's a suboptimal arrangement. The laptop has UEFI firmware, and this legacy boot option when enabled activates something called a Compatibility Support Module which will present a faux-BIOS firmware to the bootloader and operating system. It's designed for supporting old, and thus legacy, operating systems. Fedora isn't a legacy OS. Short of unfixable or unworkaroundable UEFI bugs, it's better if this option is disabled and you reinstall, even if you have some new problems related to UEFI to work through. At least on one of my laptops with legacy mode, SSD drives run in IDE compatibility mode rather than as SATA devices, and everything is slower, but not as slow as what it sounds like you're experiencing. I also think it's a little weird that these firmware settings change when you hard reset. It makes me suspect firmware bugs, and that means there might be a firmware update that'll fix them. Confusingly the manufacturers often still call these BIOS updates, even though what they mean is firmware update. So I suggest checking for firmware updates with the manufacture. If you don't have Windows installed, hopefully they have a DOS based installer. Those come in two flavors, single image that includes DOS and the updater, and updater only. If updater only you can use FreeDOS. RTC Wakeup from S4 - (Gets set to Enabled, Fedora won't boot unless this is set to Disabled) SW Guard Extensions (SGX) - (Gets set to Enabled, Fedora won't boot unless this is set to Disabled) Sometimes I need to go into secure boot configuration and choose "Delete All Signatures" That's not expected. Secure Boot is disabled when Legacy OS is enabled. The two aren't compatible. If I do a dnf update and get a new kernel then the above process is triggered as well Other than struggling with booting a bit the laptop works great with Fedora. Anyone have any insight on how to fix the above issues? Can't fix it until the problem is understood. Right now it's a search for why it's happening. Thanks, I'll give the list-jobs bit a try. Meanwhile here is mt fstab file: root@F30-host # cat /etc/fstab # # /etc/fstab # Created by anaconda on Wed Dec 31 19:25:43 1997 # # Accessible filesystems, by reference, are maintained under '/dev/disk/'. # See man pages fstab(5), findfs(8), mount(8) and/or blkid(8) for more info. # # After editing this file, run 'systemctl daemon-reload' to update systemd # units generated from this file. # UUID=e2654eae-f91a-4703-a18e-9ff92e815450 / ext4 defaults 1 1 UUID=de4a0b48-7d2b-49c5-b8cb-feca56178444 /boot ext4 defaults 1 2 UUID=361aeb12-1e4e-494f-9a05-be298b45828a /data ext4 defaults 1 2 UUID=2eb9d524-e7e3-4e8a-823f-cea19f3a3483 none swap defaults 0 0 And here is the output from the blkid command: root@F30-host # blkid /dev/sda1: UUID="de4a0b48-7d2b-49c5-b8cb-feca56178444" TYP
Re: Boot & Bios Issues
Oddly enough the slow boot / shutdowns have dissappeared, the only remaining issue is the bios setting weirdness, including the fact that Linux will not boot without legacy OS Boot = on Thoughts? On 5/7/19 8:08 PM, Chris Murphy wrote: On Tue, May 7, 2019 at 3:54 PM S. Bob wrote: root@F30-host # cat /etc/fstab # # /etc/fstab # Created by anaconda on Wed Dec 31 19:25:43 1997 # # Accessible filesystems, by reference, are maintained under '/dev/disk/'. # See man pages fstab(5), findfs(8), mount(8) and/or blkid(8) for more info. # # After editing this file, run 'systemctl daemon-reload' to update systemd # units generated from this file. # UUID=e2654eae-f91a-4703-a18e-9ff92e815450 / ext4defaults1 1 UUID=de4a0b48-7d2b-49c5-b8cb-feca56178444 /boot ext4defaults1 2 UUID=361aeb12-1e4e-494f-9a05-be298b45828a /data ext4defaults1 2 UUID=2eb9d524-e7e3-4e8a-823f-cea19f3a3483 none swapdefaults0 0 And here is the output from the blkid command: root@F30-host # blkid /dev/sda1: UUID="de4a0b48-7d2b-49c5-b8cb-feca56178444" TYPE="ext4" PARTUUID="35cdfa7a-01" /dev/sda2: UUID="e2654eae-f91a-4703-a18e-9ff92e815450" TYPE="ext4" PARTUUID="35cdfa7a-02" /dev/sda3: UUID="2eb9d524-e7e3-4e8a-823f-cea19f3a3483" TYPE="swap" PARTUUID="35cdfa7a-03" /dev/sdb1: UUID="361aeb12-1e4e-494f-9a05-be298b45828a" TYPE="ext4" PARTUUID="a474e262-01" Both of those are reasonable. I'd do the debug shell bit, and then do: # systemctl list-jobs # systemctl status # journalctl -b -o short-monotonic # coredumpctl The monotonic time instead of wall clock time will make it easier to see delays. You can add '> journal.log' to output to a file and post it somewhere, maybe someone on the list will have interest in poking through it. The three ways to get more verbose logging are the following boot parameters: systemd.log_level=debug rd.udev.debug rd.debug I don't often use all three at the time time because each one makes boot slower and the journal much bigger, and there's that much more stuff to have to go through. On the other hand, if you have no idea what's going on, it can be tedious to use them separately. I almost always start with systemd debug first, and then udev debug (often omitting systemd debug). Maybe you've got a drive that's just not mounting very quickly and it's holding up the flush to journal, I'm not really sure what would cause that. Another possibility is something is crashing and the coredump being written to /var is soaking the available write bandwidth of the drive, the coredumpctl command will list captured crashes. So yeah you'll have to poke around. ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: how to install zoom client.
become root (or use sudo) and run :
dnf install [filename]
where filename is the zoom_x86_64.rpm file
for example, if you downloaded the file to /home/jbob/Downloads:
sudo dnf install /home/jbob/Downloads/zoom_x86_64.rpm
or
su -
[enter pw]
# dnf install /home/jbob/Downloads/zoom_x86_64.rpm
On 7/1/19 12:01 PM, home user via users wrote:
Good morning,
(f-29)
(background)
Last week, I was to participate in a "Zoom" meeting for a charity that
I'm involved in. I have the needed software on my rarely-used
windows-7 box. But I could not complete the windows-7 login (some
problem with a windows-7 service). I've since found there is a "Zoom"
client for Fedora. "dnfdragora" does not find anything for it. But I
found a web page that I hope has what I need. I've downloaded the
package ("zoom_x86_64.rpm"), and I've downloaded a "Public Key"
("package-signing-key.pub"). The web site from which I've downloaded
these also has a line:
Key fingerprint: [some 40 hex digit number]
(4 questions)
1. Do the 2 files need to be in a specific place to do the install?
If yes, where?
2. Do I need to be "root" to do the install?
3. What do I do with the "Key fingerprint"?
4. How do I do the install (preferably using "dnf")?
thanks,
Bill.
___
users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct:
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives:
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org
___
users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct:
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives:
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: KDE on Fedora 30/31
On 9/21/19 1:35 PM, Ed Greshko wrote: On 9/22/19 2:19 AM, William Oliver wrote: So... for the KDE users out there, how is Fedora doing with KDE nowadays? No issues here. You can check the kde mailing list to see that it is rather quite. Been using it for years, they had a problem early on with plasma, had to run another UI for a bit. Works great now ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org
Authorization supplicant timed out errors
All; I posted to the Fedora KDE list with no reply, anyone here have any ideas: I am having my wifi connection reset throughout the day. I get a popup message that says : *Wireless interface (wlp82s0)* *Authorization supplicant timed out* This happens every 2 - 4 hours, it's new but I'm not sure I can point to a specific update Thanks in advance ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: Authorization supplicant timed out errors
I've not rebooted the AP, I'll give that a shot, thanks On 8/18/20 6:13 PM, Mr Brian Domenick wrote: Are you doing 802.1x ? Have you made sure your authentication server is in order ? If its just a simple AP, have you tried to reboot AP ? On 8/18/20 4:51 PM, S Bob wrote: All; I posted to the Fedora KDE list with no reply, anyone here have any ideas: I am having my wifi connection reset throughout the day. I get a popup message that says : *Wireless interface (wlp82s0)* *Authorization supplicant timed out* This happens every 2 - 4 hours, it's new but I'm not sure I can point to a specific update Thanks in advance ___ users mailing list --users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email tousers-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct:https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines:https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives:https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: Authorization supplicant timed out errors
I'm running a thinkpad P73 with this wireless card: Intel AX200 2x2AX+BT vPro WW I'll check the AP hardware later this week when I'm back at the location where I have issues On 8/18/20 6:47 PM, Ed Greshko wrote: On 2020-08-19 07:51, S Bob wrote: I am having my wifi connection reset throughout the day. I get a popup message that says : *Wireless interface (wlp82s0)* *Authorization supplicant timed out* This happens every 2 - 4 hours, it's new but I'm not sure I can point to a specific update Could you supply information on your wireless hardware? Also, have you checked for journal messages around the time of the popup? ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: Authorization supplicant timed out errors
On 8/19/20 5:04 AM, George N. White III wrote: On Tue, 18 Aug 2020 at 20:52, S Bob <mailto:s...@quadratum-braccas.com>> wrote: All; I posted to the Fedora KDE list with no reply, anyone here have any ideas: I am having my wifi connection reset throughout the day. I get a popup message that says : *Wireless interface (wlp82s0)* *Authorization supplicant timed out* This happens every 2 - 4 hours, it's new but I'm not sure I can point to a specific update It is useful to have a USB wifi dongle for times like this. Are you in a location (high density) with crowded wifi spectrum? Probably, i a crowded suburb of Denver, CO Consider electrical power issues such as a big load (refrigeration, HVAC) and overheating (warm weather, accumulated dust on cooling vents and fins). I'll check Do you own the wifi router or is it supplied by your internet provider (subject to stealth upgrades)? I own the AP and I use an untangle firewall server, but comcast owns the cable router incoming to the network -- George N. White III ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org
VM tool for Fedora 32
All; I'm looking for suggestions for a VM tool for Fedora 32. I am tired of having to constantly patch VMware and have it stop working every time I update to a new kernel. Looking for suggestions. Does KVM run on fedora 32? Can I install a windows VM with KVM? Anyone using other tools? Thanks in advance ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org
Firefox slow after recent update
Hi; I've noticed firefox is noticeably slower after the last update. Anyone else seeing this? Any easy fixes? Thanks in advance ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora on a remote mac
Hi all; I have a Fedora 33 laptop. I also have a mac running OSX 10.15 I want to run firefox on the mac but display it on the Fedora laptop. Is there a way to do this with tunneling? ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org
Run Firefox on a remote mac with display on my Linux laptop
Hi all; I have a Fedora laptop, and a mac laptop (OSX 10.15) Is there a method I can use to run firefon on the mac and have it display on my Fedora laptop? Thanks in advance Sorry if this seems to be a dupe, my previous subject line was unclear ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora & VMware on a mac - using the cisco vpn connection of the host, is it possible?
Hi; I have a contract with a client and they have sent me a mac (ugh). I thought it would be ok since I mostly spend my time at the command line but the mac OS is driving me crazy. I hate this thing more with every passing day, it's like using a preschool toy to do real work. The mac interface is the worst pain I've had to endure in a long time. Literally the only good thing I can say about it is that it's not windows. Even simple tasks like getting it to use a second monitor with the laptop lid closed take way more time than it should and usually end in frustration and a t least one reboot. So... they will let me run VMware and I have installed Fedora 30 in a VM. However much of the content I need to access such as mail, internal company web pages, etc are all accessed via a cisco VPN and a usb key I use to log in. Is there any way for me to fire up my Fedora VM and have all of it's access just 'pass through' to the host, including using the cisco vpn? Thanks in advance ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: Fedora & VMware on a mac - using the cisco vpn connection of the host, is it possible?
Or even better, is there an easy way to either: a) setup some sort of tunnel from my Fedora laptop and use it to run firefox, email, etc all going through the cicso vpn b) clone the mac in its entirety, even the security bits and run it as a local VMware workstation VM (via the mac unlocker), if I really must run a stupid OS then it would be better in a VM On 12/22/20 11:43 AM, S Bob wrote: Hi; I have a contract with a client and they have sent me a mac (ugh). I thought it would be ok since I mostly spend my time at the command line but the mac OS is driving me crazy. I hate this thing more with every passing day, it's like using a preschool toy to do real work. The mac interface is the worst pain I've had to endure in a long time. Literally the only good thing I can say about it is that it's not windows. Even simple tasks like getting it to use a second monitor with the laptop lid closed take way more time than it should and usually end in frustration and a t least one reboot. So... they will let me run VMware and I have installed Fedora 30 in a VM. However much of the content I need to access such as mail, internal company web pages, etc are all accessed via a cisco VPN and a usb key I use to log in. Is there any way for me to fire up my Fedora VM and have all of it's access just 'pass through' to the host, including using the cisco vpn? Thanks in advance ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora 32 / 33 on an LG Gram?
All; Has anyone installed Fedora on an LG Gram? I bought one a few years back and ended up returning it due to issues... Maybe these laptops are better supported now? Thanks in advance for any advice... ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
Re: Fedora 32 / 33 on an LG Gram? (SOLVED)
On 2/14/21 10:44 AM, S Bob wrote: All; Has anyone installed Fedora on an LG Gram? I bought one a few years back and ended up returning it due to issues... Maybe these laptops are better supported now? Thanks in advance for any advice... All; Just a heads up. I couldn't wait so I bought it. Fedora 33 runs great on it. I bought a 32GB memory stick and 2 2TB M.2 SSD drives as this laptop has the capacity for it In case anyone is interested: The laptop would not install from a DVD, so I used a usb memory stick and made it bootable with the Fedora Live iso: # dd if=/home/kevink/Downloads/ISO/Fedora-KDE-Live-x86_64-33-1.2.iso of=/dev/sdb bs=8M I had to go into the bios and change the following: - disable secure boot - make the usb memory stick the first boot device - disable the windows boot device (this is key, otherwise the laptop would not boot from anything but windows) At this point the laptop boots the Fedora install and the rest is standard ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
cannot ssh between 2 Fedora 33 laptops
All; I have 2 new laptops, with new installs of Fedora 33 On both laptops I have run: # systemctl start sshd # systemctl stop firewalld They are both on the same wifi network a ping from either laptop to the IP of the other one produces "Destination Host Unreachable" Is there something else in Fedora 33 I need to do? Thanks in advance ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
Re: cannot ssh between 2 Fedora 33 laptops
I have a comcast router and an untangle firewall setup, all laptops are behind the firewall. I also have 2 laptops running Fedora 32, I can ssh to/from the Fedora 32 laptops without any issues So, here's my attempts to ssh: F32 = the old Fedora 32 laptop (IP = 10.16.0.101) F33a is one of the new Fedora 33 laptops (IP = 10.16.0.195) F33b is one of the new Fedora 33 laptops (IP = 10.16.0.158) From F32, ssh to F33a (success) From F33a to F32 (success) From F32 to F33b (success) From F33b to F32 (success) From F33a to F33b (fail) From F33b to F33a (fail) I'm stumped, I've been running Fedora laptops in this network for years and never had this issue. Thoughts? On 2/15/21 5:24 PM, Ed Greshko wrote: On 16/02/2021 08:09, S Bob wrote: All; I have 2 new laptops, with new installs of Fedora 33 On both laptops I have run: # systemctl start sshd # systemctl stop firewalld They are both on the same wifi network a ping from either laptop to the IP of the other one produces "Destination Host Unreachable" Is there something else in Fedora 33 I need to do? Sounds more like an issue external to the laptops. But you don't give much info on the network side. What kind of WiFi router or access point are the systems connected to? Does "traceroute" return the same message? ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
Re: cannot ssh between 2 Fedora 33 laptops (SOLVED)
It was SELINUX On 2/15/21 6:05 PM, S Bob wrote: I have a comcast router and an untangle firewall setup, all laptops are behind the firewall. I also have 2 laptops running Fedora 32, I can ssh to/from the Fedora 32 laptops without any issues So, here's my attempts to ssh: F32 = the old Fedora 32 laptop (IP = 10.16.0.101) F33a is one of the new Fedora 33 laptops (IP = 10.16.0.195) F33b is one of the new Fedora 33 laptops (IP = 10.16.0.158) From F32, ssh to F33a (success) From F33a to F32 (success) From F32 to F33b (success) From F33b to F32 (success) From F33a to F33b (fail) From F33b to F33a (fail) I'm stumped, I've been running Fedora laptops in this network for years and never had this issue. Thoughts? On 2/15/21 5:24 PM, Ed Greshko wrote: On 16/02/2021 08:09, S Bob wrote: All; I have 2 new laptops, with new installs of Fedora 33 On both laptops I have run: # systemctl start sshd # systemctl stop firewalld They are both on the same wifi network a ping from either laptop to the IP of the other one produces "Destination Host Unreachable" Is there something else in Fedora 33 I need to do? Sounds more like an issue external to the laptops. But you don't give much info on the network side. What kind of WiFi router or access point are the systems connected to? Does "traceroute" return the same message? ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
Re: cannot ssh between 2 Fedora 33 laptops (SOLVED)
I disabled SELINUX on the new laptops (dont need it here) and everything works On 2/15/21 6:22 PM, Samuel Sieb wrote: On 2/15/21 5:16 PM, S Bob wrote: It was SELINUX Can you provide more details? ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
Re: Fedora 32 / 33 on an LG Gram? (SOLVED)
Everything I read said to disable secure boot so I disabled it from the start On 2/15/21 6:18 PM, Matthew Miller wrote: On Mon, Feb 15, 2021 at 08:14:10AM -0700, S Bob wrote: I had to go into the bios and change the following: - disable secure boot Did it not boot with secure boot enabled? It should! ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
Re: cannot ssh between 2 Fedora 33 laptops (SOLVED)
I was using the default port (22). I did a standard install and did not change anything in the ssh config On 2/15/21 7:13 PM, Jonathan Billings wrote: On Feb 15, 2021, at 20:59, S Bob wrote: I disabled SELINUX on the new laptops (dont need it here) and everything works Are you running sshd on a port other than 22? What AVCs were generated when SELinux is in permissive mode? SELinux should absolutely not block ssh from working in a standard config. — Jonathan Billings ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
Re: Fedora 32 / 33 on an LG Gram? (SOLVED)
On 2/15/21 9:05 PM, Matthew Miller wrote: On Mon, Feb 15, 2021 at 06:59:15PM -0700, S Bob wrote: Everything I read said to disable secure boot so I disabled it from the start Which things did you read? These are likely: 1. Out of date 2. Superstition 3. People who need the nvidia driver to work (it can't, since it's not signed.) Secure Boot is important because it protects from malware which could insert itself into the firmware and be quite difficult to remove or even detect. Looks like your laptop has Intel graphics, so it should just work. When you get a chance, can you turn it back on and report if you have problems? Will do Thanks! ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
Re: cannot ssh between 2 Fedora 33 laptops (SOLVED)
On 2/15/21 7:21 PM, Gordon Messmer wrote: On 2/15/21 5:58 PM, S Bob wrote: I disabled SELINUX on the new laptops (dont need it here) and everything works I don't believe there's any mechanism by which SELinux can result in ping indicating "destination host unreachable." Can you reproduce the problem by turning SELinux back on? If not, then the problem was something else. I'll check and report back ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
Re: Fedora 32 / 33 on an LG Gram? (SOLVED)
I re-enabled secure boot and the laptop does still boot, good news! Also I tried a usb-c network connector and it also works for a wired internet connection On 2/15/21 9:26 PM, S Bob wrote: On 2/15/21 9:05 PM, Matthew Miller wrote: On Mon, Feb 15, 2021 at 06:59:15PM -0700, S Bob wrote: Everything I read said to disable secure boot so I disabled it from the start Which things did you read? These are likely: 1. Out of date 2. Superstition 3. People who need the nvidia driver to work (it can't, since it's not signed.) Secure Boot is important because it protects from malware which could insert itself into the firmware and be quite difficult to remove or even detect. Looks like your laptop has Intel graphics, so it should just work. When you get a chance, can you turn it back on and report if you have problems? Will do Thanks! ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
Bluetooth keeps disconnecting - Fedora 33
All; I have a shiny new Fedora 33 install on my new LG Gram 17 I'm having an issue where every 10 min or so my bluetooth music player disconnects, then reconnects and starts playing again. Any advice on how to debug / fix? Thanks in advance ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
