OT:Question on NVME disk direct access?

2018-04-02 Thread Michael D. Setzer II
I'm the maintainer of the G4L disk imaging project since 2004, and I use 
Fedora as the build platform. Currently using Fedora 27.

Have an issue from a user that has me baffled, so am hoping someone here 
might provide some guidance. 

The program boots a linux kernel, and basically uses dd to copy the 
disk/partitions thru a compression program and creates an image file on ftp 
server or local device.

I don't have any physical nvme disks, but using virtualbox I created a 4M 
disk, and 2 - 2M partitions within it. In testing that, the 4M disk compresses 
to 
a 30K file, and the 2M partitions compress to about 15K each. That is what is 
expected with cleared partitions.

The user though, with a real 256G disk doesn't seem to get any compression 
of the disk or partitions. Them resulting images are close to the same size as 
the disks or partitions??

He can mount the partitions and see the files, so there must be something 
going on that I don't see? 

Would think that accessing the /dev/nvme0n1 or partitions /dev/nvme0n1p1 
thru p5 would act the same as accessing /dev/sda or /dev/sdax partitions.

The images that are created pass the compression program test, so it is 
reading data, but in some form that doesn't compress much, and user has 
used a program to clear the unused space?

Thanks for your time, and any ideals.

+----------------+
 Michael D. Setzer II - Computer Science Instructor (Retired) 
 mailto:mi...@guam.net
 mailto:msetze...@gmail.com
 Guam - Where America's Day Begins
 G4L Disk Imaging Project maintainer 
 http://sourceforge.net/projects/g4l/
++

http://setiathome.berkeley.edu (Original)
Number of Seti Units Returned:  19,471
Processing time:  32 years, 290 days, 12 hours, 58 minutes
(Total Hours: 287,489)

BOINC@HOME CREDITS

ROSETTA  65094199.902703 | ABC  16613838.513356
SETI109335656.779734 | EINSTEIN140992828.999240
___
users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org


Re: OT:Question on NVME disk direct access?

2018-04-04 Thread Michael D. Setzer II
On 4 Apr 2018 at 21:01, Todd Chester wrote:

Subject:Re: OT:Question on NVME disk direct access?
To: users@lists.fedoraproject.org
From:   Todd Chester 
Date sent:  Wed, 4 Apr 2018 21:01:15 -0700
Send reply to:  Community support for Fedora users 


> 
> 
> On 04/02/2018 11:30 AM, Michael D. Setzer II wrote:
> > I'm the maintainer of the G4L disk imaging project since 2004, and I use
> > Fedora as the build platform. Currently using Fedora 27.
> > 
> > Have an issue from a user that has me baffled, so am hoping someone here
> > might provide some guidance.
> > 
> > The program boots a linux kernel, and basically uses dd to copy the
> > disk/partitions thru a compression program and creates an image file on ftp
> > server or local device.
> > 
> > I don't have any physical nvme disks, but using virtualbox I created a 4M
> > disk, and 2 - 2M partitions within it. In testing that, the 4M disk 
> > compresses to
> > a 30K file, and the 2M partitions compress to about 15K each. That is what 
> > is
> > expected with cleared partitions.
> > 
> > The user though, with a real 256G disk doesn't seem to get any compression
> > of the disk or partitions. Them resulting images are close to the same size 
> > as
> > the disks or partitions??
> > 
> > He can mount the partitions and see the files, so there must be something
> > going on that I don't see?
> > 
> > Would think that accessing the /dev/nvme0n1 or partitions /dev/nvme0n1p1
> > thru p5 would act the same as accessing /dev/sda or /dev/sdax partitions.
> > 
> > The images that are created pass the compression program test, so it is
> > reading data, but in some form that doesn't compress much, and user has
> > used a program to clear the unused space?
> > 
> > Thanks for your time, and any ideals.
> 
> Hi Michael,
> 
> This probably won't help as I don't entirely understand your
> question.
> 
> My FC27 system has a LUKS encrypted 1 GB NVMe drive.  I clone
> the drive to a mechanical drive as a poor man's RAID1.  NVMe
> drives don't do RAID1.
> 
> My first attempt, was booting off a Live USB and do a "dd".
> It was a disaster.  Took 14 hours and did not work in the
> end.
> 
> Then I switched Clone Zilla to do the clone and it has worked
> perfectly about 5 times now.  The mechanical clone drive boots
> perfectly too.
> 
> Clone Zilla only takes 1:24 to clone.  It uses dd to clone LUKS
> drives, so who knows why Clone Zilla's works and mine does not.
> 
> -T
> 

Thanks for the reply. There are lots of issues with doing cloning. 
Usually, doing a disk clone gets arround issues where the boot loader is 
using the blkid, since it makes the blikids for the partitions the same. 
Problem 
with that thou is that you can't have to disks in the same machine with the 
same blkids. Once cloned a disk, and then rebooted it to the OS without 
disconnecting, and for some reason, it mounted some partitions from the first 
disk, and others from the second?

Same issue with the boot loaders using the /dev/sdx option. If you clone a 
disk on /dev/sda to /dev/sdb it works fine, but if you remove sda to test if it 
will boot, it will not since second disk with have sdb instead of the sda. Have 
to switch cables, or change boot order in bios.

Contacted the person in charge of the nvme program, and he says it should 
work as it does with the virtualbox test I did.

User was using a windows program called eraser to clear the drive, but from 
what I have just found it seems to be a security eraser, and rights random 
data to the unused space as contrasted to writing nulls. Think the program 
was probable working just fine, but with completely random data the lzop 
compression doesn't work well. About twice the speed of gzip but 10% larger 
images. I could take a 1T disk, and compress it down to a 40G file with 
Windows 10 and Fedora 25 on it. 

My classroom setup also, had and NFTS clone image file on a separate 
partitions, and had an grub boot option, that would reimage the 160G 
Windows 10 partition in about 12 minutes.  About a 20G image file.

Have a program on the g4l disk that will zero out the unused space, so have 
asked the user to try using that to clean disk, and then make image.

Hopefully, that will result in the expected compression.

Thanks again for the info.

___
> users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org
> To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org


++
 Michael D. Setzer II - Computer Science Instructor (Re

Re: OT:Question on NVME disk direct access?

2018-04-05 Thread Michael D. Setzer II
My G4L program can clone to local disk or usb flash. Use a 128G USB flash 
for my home machine, and to do my mom's machine as a backup.

If hard disk were to crash, could quickly pop out the disk, and put in a new 
one, then boot from the usb flash or cd, and reimage.

At the College, I had an ftp server in my classroom that was running 1G 
network, and would make a compressed image on the server. Could even to 
a PXE boot from machines to load the g4l and do an image. Even had g4l as 
a boot option in the grub menu, just had to modify the 40_custom file, and 
put the kernel file and ramdisk.lzma in the /boot directory.

Have a script on the g4l image that can clean partitions, and it supports 
linux, 
ntfs, fat32 and even swap partitions. With fat32, it has to make multiple 2G 
files until disk is full due to the file size limit. Other ones don't have that 
issue, 
but fat32 is getting less and less common.

Use lzop as compression program, since it is about twice as fast as gzip, and 
image is only about 10% larger.

Program is on sourceforge, and is free, and has full source code if one wants 
to look at it.



On 5 Apr 2018 at 0:59, Todd Chester wrote:

Subject:Re: OT:Question on NVME disk direct access?
To: users@lists.fedoraproject.org
From:   Todd Chester 
Date sent:  Thu, 5 Apr 2018 00:59:39 -0700
Send reply to:  Community support for Fedora users 


> 
> 
> On 04/04/2018 09:43 PM, Michael D. Setzer II wrote:
> 
> > Thanks for the reply. There are lots of issues with doing cloning.
> > Usually, doing a disk clone gets arround issues where the boot loader is
> > using the blkid, since it makes the blikids for the partitions the same. 
> > Problem
> > with that thou is that you can't have to disks in the same machine with the
> > same blkids. Once cloned a disk, and then rebooted it to the OS without
> > disconnecting, and for some reason, it mounted some partitions from the 
> > first
> > disk, and others from the second?
> > 
> > Same issue with the boot loaders using the /dev/sdx option. If you clone a
> > disk on /dev/sda to /dev/sdb it works fine, but if you remove sda to test 
> > if it
> > will boot, it will not since second disk with have sdb instead of the sda. 
> > Have
> > to switch cables, or change boot order in bios.
> > 
> > Contacted the person in charge of the nvme program, and he says it should
> > work as it does with the virtualbox test I did.
> 
> Chuckle.  I have the same problem.  My two backup drives and my clone
> drive fit into a removable SATA drive sleeve.  If I forget to remove
> the clone drive after I do the clone, Fedora will boot off the clone
> drive and mix things up as you describe.  I researched as to why
> this happens and it is all do to both drives having the same UUID
> numbers on their partitions.
> 
> I am not in my office at the moment, but when I do get back, I can
> send you a bash script I wrote to warm me when this happens.  Let
> me know if you would like it.
> 
> I frequently forget to swap out the clone drive and reinsert one
> of the backup drives.  The first clue is that it takes about
> eight times longer to boot.
> 
> 
> > User was using a windows program called eraser to clear the drive, but from
> > what I have just found it seems to be a security eraser, and rights random
> > data to the unused space as contrasted to writing nulls. Think the program
> > was probable working just fine, but with completely random data the lzop
> > compression doesn't work well. About twice the speed of gzip but 10% larger
> > images. I could take a 1T disk, and compress it down to a 40G file with
> > Windows 10 and Fedora 25 on it.
> 
> If you what to completely blank a disk out, don't mess around with that
> operating system whose name I shall not mention.  (I hear it is slow,
> buggy, and expensive.)  Stay in Linux.
> 
> # dd bs=1M if=/dev/zero of=/dev/sdx
> 
> /dev/zero is the fastest, but you also have /dev/one which is slower
> and /dev/random which is really slow.
> 
> 
> > My classroom setup also, had and NFTS clone image file on a separate
> > partitions, and had an grub boot option, that would reimage the 160G
> > Windows 10 partition in about 12 minutes.  About a 20G image file.
> > 
> > Have a program on the g4l disk that will zero out the unused space, so have
> > asked the user to try using that to clean disk, and then make image.
> > 
> > Hopefully, that will result in the expected compression.
> 
> Take a look at Clone Zilla, it does all that for you:
> http://clonezilla.org/
> 
> The author is extremely responsive to questions too.
&g

Re: OT:Question on NVME disk direct access?

2018-04-05 Thread Michael D. Setzer II
I like making image files, and include the date as back of the image name. 
That way, I can have multiple backups of images, and in the event of 
something going wrong, can restore older versions on other disk to recover 
files that might have been deleted that should not have been.


On 5 Apr 2018 at 10:21, ToddAndMargo wrote:

From:   ToddAndMargo 
Subject:Re: OT:Question on NVME disk direct access?
To: users@lists.fedoraproject.org, mi...@guam.net
Date sent:  Thu, 5 Apr 2018 10:21:26 -0700

> 
> 
> On 04/04/2018 09:43 PM, Michael D. Setzer II wrote:
> 
> > Thanks for the reply. There are lots of issues with doing cloning.
> > Usually, doing a disk clone gets arround issues where the boot loader is
> > using the blkid, since it makes the blikids for the partitions the same. 
> > Problem
> > with that thou is that you can't have to disks in the same machine with the
> > same blkids. Once cloned a disk, and then rebooted it to the OS without
> > disconnecting, and for some reason, it mounted some partitions from the 
> > first
> > disk, and others from the second?
> > 
> > Same issue with the boot loaders using the /dev/sdx option. If you clone a
> > disk on /dev/sda to /dev/sdb it works fine, but if you remove sda to test 
> > if it
> > will boot, it will not since second disk with have sdb instead of the sda. 
> > Have
> > to switch cables, or change boot order in bios.
> > 
> > Contacted the person in charge of the nvme program, and he says it should
> > work as it does with the virtualbox test I did.
> 
> Chuckle.  I have the same problem.  My two backup drives and my clone
> drive fit into a removable SATA drive sleeve.  If I forget to remove
> the clone drive after I do the clone, Fedora will boot off the clone
> drive and mix things up as you describe.  I researched as to why
> this happens and it is all do to both drives having the same UUID
> numbers on their partitions.
> 
> I am not in my office at the moment, but when I do get back, I can
> send you a bash script I wrote to warm me when this happens.  Let
> me know if you would like it.
> 
> I frequently forget to swap out the clone drive and reinsert one
> of the backup drives.  The first clue is that it takes about
> eight times longer to boot.
> 
> 
> > User was using a windows program called eraser to clear the drive, but from
> > what I have just found it seems to be a security eraser, and rights random
> > data to the unused space as contrasted to writing nulls. Think the program
> > was probable working just fine, but with completely random data the lzop
> > compression doesn't work well. About twice the speed of gzip but 10% larger
> > images. I could take a 1T disk, and compress it down to a 40G file with
> > Windows 10 and Fedora 25 on it.
> 
> If you what to completely blank a disk out, don't mess around with that
> operating system whose name I shall not mention.  (I hear it is slow,
> buggy, and expensive.)  Stay in Linux.
> 
> # dd bs=1M if=/dev/zero of=/dev/sdx
> 
> /dev/zero is the fastest, but you also have /dev/one which is slower
> and /dev/random which is really slow.
> 
> 
> > My classroom setup also, had and NFTS clone image file on a separate
> > partitions, and had an grub boot option, that would reimage the 160G
> > Windows 10 partition in about 12 minutes.  About a 20G image file.
> > 
> > Have a program on the g4l disk that will zero out the unused space, so have
> > asked the user to try using that to clean disk, and then make image.
> > 
> > Hopefully, that will result in the expected compression.
> 
> Take a look at Clone Zilla, it does all that for you:
> http://clonezilla.org/
> 
> The author is extremely responsive to questions too.
> 
> I use Clone Zilla with its rescue mode (advanced setting) on
> NTFS drives with bad sectors on them ALL THE TIME.
> 
> What ?? Yes, I have to work on THAT operating system whose name I
> shall not mentions too.  My customer base is mainly small
> businesses and they can not get apps to run on anything other
> than THAT operating system.  It is what it is.
> 
> Tip: stay the hell away from Intel SSD drives.  I use to sell them.
> They are garbage.  I took around a $2000 loss so far having to replace
> them as they go bad in my customer's machines.
> 
> I switched to Samsung SSD's and they are rock solid.  Not a
> single failure yet.  They are about 20% more expensive than
> Intel's drives, but when your have to replace them for free
> and just before they brick and lose your customer's data,
> they become extre

Re: OT:Question on NVME disk direct access?

2018-04-05 Thread Michael D. Setzer II
On 5 Apr 2018 at 9:58, ToddAndMargo wrote:

Subject:Re: OT:Question on NVME disk direct access?
To: users@lists.fedoraproject.org
From:   ToddAndMargo 
Date sent:  Thu, 5 Apr 2018 09:58:34 -0700
Send reply to:  Community support for Fedora users 


> On 04/05/2018 08:36 AM, Samuel Sieb wrote:
> > On 04/05/2018 12:59 AM, Todd Chester wrote:
> >> If you what to completely blank a disk out, don't mess around with that
> >> operating system whose name I shall not mention.  (I hear it is slow,
> >> buggy, and expensive.)  Stay in Linux.
> >>
> >>     # dd bs=1M if=/dev/zero of=/dev/sdx
> > 
> > If I understood the original post correctly, the person was wanting to 
> > blank the free space, not erase the whole disk.  The problem was that 
> > the program used was a secure eraser which filled the blank space with 
> > random data which doesn't compress.
> 
> CLone Zilla skips over data that is not allocated, unless
> your are LUKS encrypted.  Goes like the wind!

There are various options with programs. At the bit level imaging for a bare 
image restore, the OS of the disk are partition is not used, so it is just 
reading 
the raw data of all the sectors, so that a single pass restore gives 
everything. 
If one uses an option to access the data at the OS level, it can determine 
what is used or not. G4L includes ntfsclone for windows paritions, and 
fsarchiver for that and others, and it can backup data only, and is faster. 
Also, has options to change size of partitions. Bit level restores exactly the 
same size, but can be resized by other utilities afterwards.


> ___
> users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org
> To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org


++
 Michael D. Setzer II - Computer Science Instructor (Retired) 
 mailto:mi...@guam.net
 mailto:msetze...@gmail.com
 Guam - Where America's Day Begins
 G4L Disk Imaging Project maintainer 
 http://sourceforge.net/projects/g4l/
++

http://setiathome.berkeley.edu (Original)
Number of Seti Units Returned:  19,471
Processing time:  32 years, 290 days, 12 hours, 58 minutes
(Total Hours: 287,489)

BOINC@HOME CREDITS

ROSETTA  65145396.630944 | ABC  16613838.513356
SETI109336776.035164 | EINSTEIN141006633.999240
___
users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org


Re: OT:Question on NVME disk direct access?

2018-04-05 Thread Michael D. Setzer II
On 5 Apr 2018 at 8:36, Samuel Sieb wrote:

Subject:Re: OT:Question on NVME disk direct access?
To: users@lists.fedoraproject.org
From:   Samuel Sieb 
Date sent:  Thu, 5 Apr 2018 08:36:20 -0700
Send reply to:  Community support for Fedora users 


> On 04/05/2018 12:59 AM, Todd Chester wrote:
> > If you what to completely blank a disk out, don't mess around with that
> > operating system whose name I shall not mention.  (I hear it is slow,
> > buggy, and expensive.)  Stay in Linux.
> > 
> >     # dd bs=1M if=/dev/zero of=/dev/sdx
> 
> If I understood the original post correctly, the person was wanting to 
> blank the free space, not erase the whole disk.  The problem was that 
> the program used was a secure eraser which filled the blank space with 
> random data which doesn't compress.

It has now been confirmed that is the case. The user has used the G4L 
included cleaning options for the free space on the partitions, and is seeing a 
compression rate of close to 90%. The Eraser programs current 
documentation online seems to show default option is a security erase rather 
than a clearing out with zeroing. Program does have an option for that, but 
not default. 

G4L creates a 0bits file that it writes nulls to, until the partition is full 
and then 
deletes file. With Fat32 partitions, it creats multiple 2G files till partition 
full, 
and then deletes them. It doesn't blank out disks or partitions. Exception is 
for swap partition of linux, where it does get blkid info of partition, then 
zeros 
out partitions, and recreates the swap partition with same blkid info.

Thanks.


> ___
> users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org
> To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org


+--------+
 Michael D. Setzer II - Computer Science Instructor (Retired) 
 mailto:mi...@guam.net
 mailto:msetze...@gmail.com
 Guam - Where America's Day Begins
 G4L Disk Imaging Project maintainer 
 http://sourceforge.net/projects/g4l/
++

http://setiathome.berkeley.edu (Original)
Number of Seti Units Returned:  19,471
Processing time:  32 years, 290 days, 12 hours, 58 minutes
(Total Hours: 287,489)

BOINC@HOME CREDITS

ROSETTA  65145396.630944 | ABC  16613838.513356
SETI109336776.035164 | EINSTEIN141006633.999240
___
users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org


Re: OT:Question on NVME disk direct access?

2018-04-05 Thread Michael D. Setzer II
The raw mode does not do resizing, but with ntfsclone you can restore and 
image to a larger partition. At that point, it will still be the same size as 
the 
original partition, but then you run the ntfsclone resize option, and it will 
than 
modify the partition and can make use of the additional space. It could also, 
reduce the size, but have not done that myself.

fsarchiver also can do this, but it is not a program I wrote, but was asked to 
include long ago. It is a file level image, so partitions need to already exist.


On 5 Apr 2018 at 21:41, Todd Chester wrote:

Subject:Re: OT:Question on NVME disk direct access?
To: "Michael D. Setzer II" ,
Community support for Fedora users 

From:   Todd Chester 
Date sent:  Thu, 5 Apr 2018 21:41:23 -0700
Send reply to:  Community support for Fedora users 


> 
> 
> On 04/05/2018 01:15 PM, Michael D. Setzer II wrote:
> > G4L includes ntfsclone for windows paritions, and
> > fsarchiver for that and others, and it can backup data only, and is faster.
> > Also, has options to change size of partitions. Bit level restores exactly 
> > the
> > same size, but can be resized by other utilities afterwards.
> 
> Interesting.  I am going to have to try out G4L.  CloneZilla will
> not do resizing.
> ___
> users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org
> To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org


+------------+
 Michael D. Setzer II - Computer Science Instructor (Retired) 
 mailto:mi...@guam.net
 mailto:msetze...@gmail.com
 Guam - Where America's Day Begins
 G4L Disk Imaging Project maintainer 
 http://sourceforge.net/projects/g4l/
++

http://setiathome.berkeley.edu (Original)
Number of Seti Units Returned:  19,471
Processing time:  32 years, 290 days, 12 hours, 58 minutes
(Total Hours: 287,489)

BOINC@HOME CREDITS

ROSETTA  65145396.630944 | ABC  16613838.513356
SETI109336776.035164 | EINSTEIN141006633.999240
___
users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org


Re: OT:Question on NVME disk direct access?

2018-04-05 Thread Michael D. Setzer II
G4L does a few things. It has UDPcast, where it can transfer an image to 
multiple machines at one time.  Would create image files on one system, and 
the broadcast it to the 19 other machines at one time. Has other little things.

Had students work on documentation file, and the latest is at
https://sourceforge.net/projects/g4l/files/g4l%20documentation/g4l0.53-docu
mentation.pdf/download

That was built using Fedora 24 as a base. THe 0.54 version is now using 
Fedora 27 as the build system.


On 5 Apr 2018 at 21:38, Todd Chester wrote:

Subject:Re: OT:Question on NVME disk direct access?
To: "Michael D. Setzer II" ,
Community support for Fedora users 

From:   Todd Chester 
Date sent:  Thu, 5 Apr 2018 21:38:10 -0700
Send reply to:  Community support for Fedora users 


> 
> 
> On 04/05/2018 01:15 PM, Michael D. Setzer II wrote:
> > I like making image files, and include the date as back of the image name.
> > That way, I can have multiple backups of images, and in the event of
> > something going wrong, can restore older versions on other disk to recover
> > files that might have been deleted that should not have been.
> 
> CloneZilla will do a disk to image, including a network location
> ___
> users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org
> To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org


+----------------+
 Michael D. Setzer II - Computer Science Instructor (Retired) 
 mailto:mi...@guam.net
 mailto:msetze...@gmail.com
 Guam - Where America's Day Begins
 G4L Disk Imaging Project maintainer 
 http://sourceforge.net/projects/g4l/
++

http://setiathome.berkeley.edu (Original)
Number of Seti Units Returned:  19,471
Processing time:  32 years, 290 days, 12 hours, 58 minutes
(Total Hours: 287,489)

BOINC@HOME CREDITS

ROSETTA  65145396.630944 | ABC  16613838.513356
SETI109336776.035164 | EINSTEIN141006633.999240
___
users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org


Re: Safe to reinstall kernel?

2018-05-07 Thread Michael D. Setzer II
It would appear that it installed some of the items, but not others.
The reinstall would only reinstall packages that were already fully installed.

dnf upgrade 

would probable complete the process

I generally do.
dnf clean all; dnf update -y

To see what all is installed you could
rpm -qa | grep -i kernel

The see what it shows.

On 7 May 2018 at 9:54, Danny Horne via users wrote:

To: Fedora ML 
Subject:Safe to reinstall kernel?
Date sent:  Mon, 7 May 2018 09:54:02 +0100
Send reply to:  Community support for Fedora users 

From:   Danny Horne via users 
Copies to:  Danny Horne 

> Hi all,
> 
> A few days ago I updated through dnfdragora, that update included kernel
> 4.16.6.  Some way through the update my PC froze, and after leaving it
> for a while decided the only option was a hard reset.
> 
> The PC still boots to kernel 4.16.5, and there's no trace of 4.16.6 in
> the /boot directory.  DNF reports that kernel, kernel-core,
> kernel-modules and kernel-modules-extra are installed (all 4.16.6).
> 
> Would it be safe to reinstall the kernel?  Or is there a better way to
> get things up to date?
> 
> Thanks for looking
> 
> ___
> users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org
> To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org


+------------+
 Michael D. Setzer II - Computer Science Instructor (Retired) 
 mailto:mi...@guam.net
 mailto:msetze...@gmail.com
 Guam - Where America's Day Begins
 G4L Disk Imaging Project maintainer 
 http://sourceforge.net/projects/g4l/
++

http://setiathome.berkeley.edu (Original)
Number of Seti Units Returned:  19,471
Processing time:  32 years, 290 days, 12 hours, 58 minutes
(Total Hours: 287,489)

BOINC@HOME CREDITS

ROSETTA  65410275.446986 | ABC  16613838.513356
SETI109357929.734085 | EINSTEIN141058465.999240
___
users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org


Re: Could LightDM be bad?? (LONG)

2018-05-22 Thread Michael D. Setzer II
Not sure if it is related. I've seen messages about /run/user/1000 directory 
not existing for a number of things in the message log.

Have found that if I open a terminal and ssh into the same machine with the 
same user id, the directory is created and the error messages don't show up.

Thought of creating a start up process to automatically do this on login. 



On 22 May 2018 at 19:32, francis.montag...@inria.fr wrote:

From:   francis.montag...@inria.fr
To: Community support for Fedora users 

Subject:Re: Could LightDM be bad?? (LONG)
Date sent:  Tue, 22 May 2018 19:32:30 +0200
Send reply to:  Community support for Fedora users 


> 
> On Tue, 22 May 2018 09:56:25 -0700 Rick Stevens wrote:
> 
> > And I just had lightdm screw up royally. First, upon login I got an
> > XFCE polkit error popup, which is singularly useless in telling you
> > anything you can troubleshoot with. Then, I had no access to the sound
> > hardware on my machine, nor could I enable/disable wireless, play
> > with firewall settings or anything else, as polkit thought I didn't have
> > permissions to do anything, nor did it ever pop up an authentication
> > dialog.
> 
> This is not the fault of lightdm but of pam-kwallet. See this other
> thread:
> 
>   F27 problems with pam?
>   
> https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org/thread/TOHHLOSATWWU3QQEKXKBYQP4NSGMNJ4L/#4YJSDVXBFH4X3E3ZLI2CM5EXG6D2PJ2I
> 
> -- 
> francis
> ___
> users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org
> To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
> Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html
> List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
> List Archives: 
> https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/TQP2EFGQMDCUDOTFKEL3NRB4RZOFOGNC/


++
 Michael D. Setzer II - Computer Science Instructor (Retired) 
 mailto:mi...@guam.net
 mailto:msetze...@gmail.com
 Guam - Where America's Day Begins
 G4L Disk Imaging Project maintainer 
 http://sourceforge.net/projects/g4l/
++

http://setiathome.berkeley.edu (Original)
Number of Seti Units Returned:  19,471
Processing time:  32 years, 290 days, 12 hours, 58 minutes
(Total Hours: 287,489)

BOINC@HOME CREDITS

ROSETTA  65534319.832076 | ABC  16613838.513356
SETI109369103.846085 | EINSTEIN141058465.999240
___
users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/UHW225FMG26MOVNIH5JWGPSETA3ITIPR/


error with /run/user/1000/dconf

2018-05-29 Thread Michael D. Setzer II
In using gedit from command line, I will see these errors?

(gedit:18414): dconf-CRITICAL **: unable to create directory 
'/run/user/1000/dconf': Permission denied.  dconf will not work properly.

The directory actually does not exist, but there are other /urn/user 
directories.

If I ssh into the machine using the user id, then the /run/user/1000 directory 
and subdirectories are created, and then using gedit does not issue the 
errors?

Question:
1. Why isn't the /run/user/1000 directory created with a login (actually 
connected via VNC)
2. Why does an ssh login create it, but not the vnc session?



___
users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/VK735ICUL2WRINIJWZDYU67UMPXMASNA/


Re: error with /run/user/1000/dconf

2018-05-29 Thread Michael D. Setzer II
Have the session started thru the rc.local at startup

runuser -l msetzerii -c 'vncserver :xx -geometry 1280x1024'

So, not sure why that wouldn't create a login session to run the vnc??
Been running thru many version of linux going back to Redhat 9, and now 
thru to Fedora 27. Didn't notice error messages before 27, so not sure if they 
were there before. You don't see the messages if you run gedit from the 
menus, but from the command line, they pop up. 

Without the login, the directory doesn't exist.
With login.

tmpfs 758388 4758384   1% /run/user/1000
# find .
.
./dconf
./dconf/user
./bus
./systemd
./systemd/private
./systemd/notify
./systemd/transient

So, not sure if errors are not important, or if setting up an ssh startup 
process 
would be a solution. The machine doesn't have a monitor, so just vnc into it.




On 29 May 2018 at 22:13, Samuel Sieb wrote:

Subject:Re: error with /run/user/1000/dconf
To: users@lists.fedoraproject.org
From:   Samuel Sieb 
Date sent:  Tue, 29 May 2018 22:13:17 -0700
Send reply to:  Community support for Fedora users 


> On 05/29/2018 08:34 PM, Michael D. Setzer II wrote:
> > Question:
> > 1. Why isn't the /run/user/1000 directory created with a login (actually 
> > connected via VNC)
> > 2. Why does an ssh login create it, but not the vnc session?
> 
> How are you starting the VNC server?  If you aren't running through a 
> display manager, you probably aren't going through the login process.
> ___
> users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org
> To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
> Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html
> List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
> List Archives: 
> https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/BQJWQZOLDXCYH7TBEO3DXRL32BRIYSFQ/


++
 Michael D. Setzer II - Computer Science Instructor (Retired) 
 mailto:mi...@guam.net
 mailto:msetze...@gmail.com
 Guam - Where America's Day Begins
 G4L Disk Imaging Project maintainer 
 http://sourceforge.net/projects/g4l/
++

http://setiathome.berkeley.edu (Original)
Number of Seti Units Returned:  19,471
Processing time:  32 years, 290 days, 12 hours, 58 minutes
(Total Hours: 287,489)

BOINC@HOME CREDITS

ROSETTA  65556914.872459 | ABC  16613838.513356
SETI109374891.314959 | EINSTEIN141058465.999240
___
users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/X3WWKTG6LR3FSPU4UZ23VXUNFG33GBUL/


Strange issue with dhcpd and laster kernel upgrade?

2018-06-01 Thread Michael D. Setzer II
Have just had an issue with the dhcp ip addresses no longer working with the 
latest kernels on my Fedora 27 machines.

Have 4 machines at my house, 2 have fixed IP addresses, so had no 
problems, but the other 2 machines stopped getting IPs. Didn't think anything 
of it, and just assigned them fixed IP addresses.

Have an old notebook that I had just been using, and did the updates. Then 
rebooted, and it also would no longer get a connection with the 4.16.12 
kernel. Rebooted to the 4.16.11, and it connected with no problem??

Rebooted again with the 4.16.12, and it just shows connecting, but no 
connection. 

Changed the setup to hard code an IP address on the wifi routers range, and 
then it connects to the wifi just fine.

So Wifi and dhcp connection works fine with 4.16.11, but fails with 4.16.12??
Works with the IP address hard coded, so is this a kernel issue or what?

Thanks.

+----+
 Michael D. Setzer II - Computer Science Instructor (Retired) 
 mailto:mi...@guam.net
 mailto:msetze...@gmail.com
 Guam - Where America's Day Begins
 G4L Disk Imaging Project maintainer 
 http://sourceforge.net/projects/g4l/
++

http://setiathome.berkeley.edu (Original)
Number of Seti Units Returned:  19,471
Processing time:  32 years, 290 days, 12 hours, 58 minutes
(Total Hours: 287,489)

BOINC@HOME CREDITS

ROSETTA  65562597.392201 | ABC  16613838.513356
SETI109375858.605587 | EINSTEIN141132520.999240
___
users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/SBNZDCXADCUIZP3B3P6BWN4OVH35N67Q/


Re: Strange issue with dhcpd and laster kernel upgrade?

2018-06-01 Thread Michael D. Setzer II
Since it works fine with the previous kernel, and not with the new kernel, that 
would seem to pointing to the kernel versus the other devices.

With the wired devices it is a trendnet router that I've had for many years.
With the wireless, it is a blink wireless router.

In both cases, it worked before the upgrade, and rebooting to the previous 
kernel makes it work again. Just after midnight here, so will have to look into 
the things tomorrow. Have a sunrise ride, and then a funeral escort, so will 
have to wait. I'm still using Fedora 27, so perhaps it is a difference between 
the fedora 27 and Fedora 28.  Will have to see if there is some kind of failure 
message.


On 1 Jun 2018 at 21:38, Ed Greshko wrote:

From:   Ed Greshko 
Subject:Re: Strange issue with dhcpd and laster kernel upgrade?
To: users@lists.fedoraproject.org
Date sent:  Fri, 1 Jun 2018 21:38:27 +0800
Send reply to:  Community support for Fedora users 


> On 06/01/18 20:57, Michael D. Setzer II wrote:
> > Have just had an issue with the dhcp ip addresses no longer working with 
> > the 
> > latest kernels on my Fedora 27 machines.
> >
> > Have 4 machines at my house, 2 have fixed IP addresses, so had no 
> > problems, but the other 2 machines stopped getting IPs. Didn't think 
> > anything 
> > of it, and just assigned them fixed IP addresses.
> >
> > Have an old notebook that I had just been using, and did the updates. Then 
> > rebooted, and it also would no longer get a connection with the 4.16.12 
> > kernel. Rebooted to the 4.16.11, and it connected with no problem??
> >
> > Rebooted again with the 4.16.12, and it just shows connecting, but no 
> > connection. 
> >
> > Changed the setup to hard code an IP address on the wifi routers range, and 
> > then it connects to the wifi just fine.
> >
> > So Wifi and dhcp connection works fine with 4.16.11, but fails with 
> > 4.16.12??
> > Works with the IP address hard coded, so is this a kernel issue or what?
> 
> 
> You've not indicated what system is acting as the dhcp server.
> 
> My system is running F28 and 4.16.12-300.fc28 kernel.  It has one wired 
> interface
> with a fixed IP and a WiFi interface that gets its IP address via DHCP from a
> router.  No issues.
> 
> Not much thought put into this  But I did "journalctl -b | grep dhcp4 and 
> this is
> the exchange.
> 
> Jun 01 21:36:10 meimei.greshko.com NetworkManager[1017]:   
> [1527860170.5524]
> dhcp4 (wlp0s29u1u2): activation: beginning transaction (timeout in 45 seconds)
> Jun 01 21:36:10 meimei.greshko.com NetworkManager[1017]:   
> [1527860170.5554]
> dhcp4 (wlp0s29u1u2): dhclient started with pid 31750
> Jun 01 21:36:10 meimei.greshko.com NetworkManager[1017]:   
> [1527860170.5924]
> dhcp4 (wlp0s29u1u2):   address 192.168.2.190
> Jun 01 21:36:10 meimei.greshko.com NetworkManager[1017]:   
> [1527860170.5925]
> dhcp4 (wlp0s29u1u2):   plen 24 (255.255.255.0)
> Jun 01 21:36:10 meimei.greshko.com NetworkManager[1017]:   
> [1527860170.5925]
> dhcp4 (wlp0s29u1u2):   gateway 192.168.2.5
> Jun 01 21:36:10 meimei.greshko.com NetworkManager[1017]:   
> [1527860170.5925]
> dhcp4 (wlp0s29u1u2):   lease time 86400
> Jun 01 21:36:10 meimei.greshko.com NetworkManager[1017]:   
> [1527860170.5925]
> dhcp4 (wlp0s29u1u2):   hostname 'meimei'
> Jun 01 21:36:10 meimei.greshko.com NetworkManager[1017]:   
> [1527860170.5926]
> dhcp4 (wlp0s29u1u2):   nameserver '192.168.2.5'
> Jun 01 21:36:10 meimei.greshko.com NetworkManager[1017]:   
> [1527860170.5926]
> dhcp4 (wlp0s29u1u2):   domain name 'greshko.com'
> Jun 01 21:36:10 meimei.greshko.com NetworkManager[1017]:   
> [1527860170.5926]
> dhcp4 (wlp0s29u1u2): state changed unknown -> bound
> 
> -- 
> Conjecture is just a conclusion based on incomplete information. It isn't a 
> fact.
> 
> 


++
 Michael D. Setzer II - Computer Science Instructor (Retired) 
 mailto:mi...@guam.net
 mailto:msetze...@gmail.com
 Guam - Where America's Day Begins
 G4L Disk Imaging Project maintainer 
 http://sourceforge.net/projects/g4l/
++

http://setiathome.berkeley.edu (Original)
Number of Seti Units Returned:  19,471
Processing time:  32 years, 290 days, 12 hours, 58 minutes
(Total Hours: 287,489)

BOINC@HOME CREDITS

ROSETTA  65562597.392201 | ABC  16613838.513356
SETI109375858.605587 | EINSTEIN141132520.999240
___
users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/RURNVKP6V63PAYNXTSISGBI4WN5KZDDC/


Re: Strange issue with dhcpd and laster kernel upgrade?

2018-06-01 Thread Michael D. Setzer II
Didn't get anything from journalctl option, but ip is hard coded at moment.
Looked at message log, and it had over 1200 lines like these.
May 31 11:52:00 amdgcc3 NetworkManager[676]:   
[1527731520.5500] dhcp4 (enp3s0): activation: beginning transaction 
(timeout in 45 seconds)
May 31 11:52:00 amdgcc3 NetworkManager[676]:   
[1527731520.5582] dhcp4 (enp3s0): dhclient started with pid 17417
May 31 11:52:45 amdgcc3 NetworkManager[676]:   
[1527731565.3545] dhcp4 (enp3s0): request timed out
May 31 11:52:45 amdgcc3 NetworkManager[676]:   
[1527731565.3545] dhcp4 (enp3s0): state changed unknown -> timeout
May 31 11:52:45 amdgcc3 NetworkManager[676]:   
[1527731565.3568] dhcp4 (enp3s0): canceled DHCP transaction, DHCP 
client pid 17417
May 31 11:52:45 amdgcc3 NetworkManager[676]:   
[1527731565.3568] dhcp4 (enp3s0): state changed timeout -> done
May 31 11:52:45 amdgcc3 NetworkManager[676]:   
[1527731565.5538] dhcp4 (enp3s0): activation: beginning transaction 
(timeout in 45 seconds)
May 31 11:52:45 amdgcc3 NetworkManager[676]:   
[1527731565.5625] dhcp4 (enp3s0): dhclient started with pid 3041
May 31 11:53:30 amdgcc3 NetworkManager[676]:   
[1527731610.3545] dhcp4 (enp3s0): request timed out
May 31 11:53:30 amdgcc3 NetworkManager[676]:   
[1527731610.3548] dhcp4 (enp3s0): state changed unknown -> timeout
May 31 11:53:30 amdgcc3 NetworkManager[676]:   
[1527731610.3571] dhcp4 (enp3s0): canceled DHCP transaction, DHCP 
client pid 3041
May 31 11:53:30 amdgcc3 NetworkManager[676]:   
[1527731610.3572] dhcp4 (enp3s0): state changed timeout -> done
May 31 11:53:30 amdgcc3 NetworkManager[676]:   
[1527731610.5552] dhcp4 (enp3s0): activation: beginning transaction 
(timeout in 45 seconds)
May 31 11:53:30 amdgcc3 NetworkManager[676]:   
[1527731610.5616] dhcp4 (enp3s0): dhclient started with pid 22198
May 31 11:54:15 amdgcc3 NetworkManager[676]:   
[1527731655.3545] dhcp4 (enp3s0): request timed out
May 31 11:54:15 amdgcc3 NetworkManager[676]:   
[1527731655.3545] dhcp4 (enp3s0): state changed unknown -> timeout
May 31 11:54:15 amdgcc3 NetworkManager[676]:   
[1527731655.3578] dhcp4 (enp3s0): canceled DHCP transaction, DHCP 
client pid 22198
May 31 11:54:15 amdgcc3 NetworkManager[676]:   
[1527731655.3579] dhcp4 (enp3s0): state changed timeout -> done
May 31 11:54:15 amdgcc3 NetworkManager[676]:   
[1527731655.5571] dhcp4 (enp3s0): activation: beginning transaction 
(timeout in 45 seconds)
May 31 11:54:15 amdgcc3 NetworkManager[676]:   
[1527731655.5619] dhcp4 (enp3s0): dhclient started with pid 6456



On 1 Jun 2018 at 22:08, Ed Greshko wrote:

From:   Ed Greshko 
Subject:Re: Strange issue with dhcpd and laster kernel upgrade?
To: Community support for Fedora users 
Date sent:  Fri, 1 Jun 2018 22:08:50 +0800
Send reply to:  Community support for Fedora users 


> On 06/01/18 22:02, Michael D. Setzer II wrote:
> > Since it works fine with the previous kernel, and not with the new kernel, 
> > that 
> > would seem to pointing to the kernel versus the other devices.
> 
> Maybe.  But as I noted I'm using the most recent kernel and not having issues.
> >
> > With the wired devices it is a trendnet router that I've had for many years.
> > With the wireless, it is a blink wireless router.
> >
> > In both cases, it worked before the upgrade, and rebooting to the previous 
> > kernel makes it work again. Just after midnight here, so will have to look 
> > into 
> > the things tomorrow. Have a sunrise ride, and then a funeral escort, so 
> > will 
> > have to wait. I'm still using Fedora 27, so perhaps it is a difference 
> > between 
> > the fedora 27 and Fedora 28.  Will have to see if there is some kind of 
> > failure 
> > message.
> 
> OK  Check the logs, of course.
> 
> 
> -- 
> Conjecture is just a conclusion based on incomplete information. It isn't a 
> fact.
> 
> 


++
 Michael D. Setzer II - Computer Science Instructor (Retired) 
 mailto:mi...@guam.net
 mailto:msetze...@gmail.com
 Guam - Where America's Day Begins
 G4L Disk Imaging Project maintainer 
 http://sourceforge.net/projects/g4l/
++

http://setiathome.berkeley.edu (Original)
Number of Seti Units Returned:  19,471
Processing time:  32 years, 290 days, 12 hours, 58 minutes
(Total Hours: 287,489)

BOINC@HOME CREDITS

ROSETTA  65563610.075728 | ABC  16613838.513356
SETI109375858.605587 | EINSTEIN141133906.999240
___
users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/EHPKQSANHOVYPWNLFPND7CARBLS5Y3ZF/


Re: Strange issue with dhcpd and laster kernel upgrade?

2018-06-01 Thread Michael D. Setzer II
 -> 
secondaries (reason 'none', internal state 'external')
Jun 02 11:07:45 amdgcc3.dyndns.org NetworkManager[693]:   
[1527901665.9933] device (virbr0-nic): state change: secondaries -> 
activated (reason 'none', internal state 'external')
Jun 02 11:07:46 amdgcc3.dyndns.org NetworkManager[693]:   
[1527901666.0621] device (virbr0-nic): Activation: successful, device 
activated.
Jun 02 11:07:46 amdgcc3.dyndns.org NetworkManager[693]:   
[1527901666.0700] device (virbr0): state change: ip-check -> secondaries 
(reason 'none', internal state 'external')
Jun 02 11:07:46 amdgcc3.dyndns.org NetworkManager[693]:   
[1527901666.0809] device (virbr0): state change: secondaries -> activated 
(reason 'none', internal state 'external')
Jun 02 11:07:46 amdgcc3.dyndns.org NetworkManager[693]:   
[1527901666.1542] device (virbr0): Activation: successful, device activated.
Jun 02 11:07:46 amdgcc3.dyndns.org NetworkManager[693]:   
[1527901666.1731] device (virbr0-nic): state change: activated -> 
unmanaged (reason 'connection-assumed', internal state 'external')
Jun 02 11:07:46 amdgcc3.dyndns.org NetworkManager[693]:   
[1527901666.1749] device (virbr0): bridge port virbr0-nic was detached
Jun 02 11:07:46 amdgcc3.dyndns.org NetworkManager[693]:   
[1527901666.1749] device (virbr0-nic): released from master device virbr0
Jun 02 11:07:52 amdgcc3.dyndns.org dhclient[1276]: DHCPREQUEST on 
enp3s0 to 255.255.255.255 port 67 (xid=0xf4583b1d)
Jun 02 11:08:11 amdgcc3.dyndns.org dhclient[1276]: DHCPDISCOVER on 
enp3s0 to 255.255.255.255 port 67 interval 7 (xid=0x2ecd1823)
Jun 02 11:08:12 amdgcc3.dyndns.org dhclient[1276]: DHCPREQUEST on 
enp3s0 to 255.255.255.255 port 67 (xid=0x2ecd1823)
Jun 02 11:08:12 amdgcc3.dyndns.org dhclient[1276]: DHCPOFFER from 
192.168.0.1
Jun 02 11:08:12 amdgcc3.dyndns.org dhclient[1276]: DHCPACK from 
192.168.0.1 (xid=0x2ecd1823)
Jun 02 11:08:12 amdgcc3.dyndns.org NetworkManager[693]:   
[1527901692.8513] dhcp4 (enp3s0):   address 192.168.0.115
Jun 02 11:08:12 amdgcc3.dyndns.org NetworkManager[693]:   
[1527901692.8572] dhcp4 (enp3s0):   plen 24 (255.255.255.0)
Jun 02 11:08:12 amdgcc3.dyndns.org NetworkManager[693]:   
[1527901692.8579] dhcp4 (enp3s0):   gateway 192.168.0.1
Jun 02 11:08:12 amdgcc3.dyndns.org NetworkManager[693]:   
[1527901692.8584] dhcp4 (enp3s0):   lease time 31536
Jun 02 11:08:12 amdgcc3.dyndns.org NetworkManager[693]:   
[1527901692.8606] dhcp4 (enp3s0):   nameserver '192.168.0.1'
Jun 02 11:08:12 amdgcc3.dyndns.org NetworkManager[693]:   
[1527901692.8614] dhcp4 (enp3s0): state changed unknown -> bound
Jun 02 11:08:12 amdgcc3.dyndns.org NetworkManager[693]:   
[1527901692.8880] device (enp3s0): state change: ip-config -> ip-check 
(reason 'none', internal state 'managed')
Jun 02 11:08:13 amdgcc3.dyndns.org NetworkManager[693]:   
[1527901693.1266] device (enp3s0): state change: ip-check -> secondaries 
(reason 'none', internal state 'managed')
Jun 02 11:08:13 amdgcc3.dyndns.org NetworkManager[693]:   
[1527901693.1286] device (enp3s0): state change: secondaries -> activated 
(reason 'none', internal state 'managed')
Jun 02 11:08:13 amdgcc3.dyndns.org NetworkManager[693]:   
[1527901693.1307] manager: NetworkManager state is now 
CONNECTED_LOCAL
Jun 02 11:08:14 amdgcc3.dyndns.org dhclient[1276]: bound to 
192.168.0.115 -- renewal in 151506569 seconds.
Jun 02 11:08:14 amdgcc3.dyndns.org NetworkManager[693]:   
[1527901694.8517] manager: NetworkManager state is now 
CONNECTED_SITE
Jun 02 11:08:14 amdgcc3.dyndns.org NetworkManager[693]:   
[1527901694.8543] policy: set 'Wired connection 1' (enp3s0) as default for 
IPv4 routing and DNS
Jun 02 11:08:14 amdgcc3.dyndns.org NetworkManager[693]:   
[1527901694.8583] device (enp3s0): Activation: successful, device activated.
Jun 02 11:08:14 amdgcc3.dyndns.org NetworkManager[693]:   
[1527901694.8702] manager: startup complete
Jun 02 11:08:27 amdgcc3.dyndns.org NetworkManager[693]:   
[1527901707.2724] manager: NetworkManager state is now 
CONNECTED_GLOBAL

=== end ===

On 2 Jun 2018 at 5:55, Ed Greshko wrote:

From:   Ed Greshko 
Subject:Re: Strange issue with dhcpd and laster kernel upgrade?
To: Community support for Fedora users 
Date sent:  Sat, 2 Jun 2018 05:55:19 +0800
Send reply to:  Community support for Fedora users 


> On 06/02/18 03:02, Michael D. Setzer II wrote:
> > Didn't get anything from journalctl option, but ip is hard coded at moment.
> > Looked at message log, and it had over 1200 lines like these.
> > May 31 11:52:00 amdgcc3 NetworkManager[676]:   
> > [1527731520.5500] dhcp4 (enp3s0): activation: beginning transaction 
> > (timeout in 45 seconds)
>  
> I think you are saying that DHCP is also failing to set the address on your 
> wired
> connection? 

missing header files from /usr/include/rpc directory??

2018-06-18 Thread Michael D. Setzer II
Upgraded a system from fedora 27 to fedora 28, and went to rebuild 
busybox, and it fails with 3 header files missing?

With Fedora 27 the directory contains a number of header files, but with 
fedora 28 it only contains netdb.h??

Fedora 27 shows glibc-headers as being the patchage that provides them, 
and Fedora 28 has the package install, but a search on it results with no files 
that provides the missing files.

Reinstalled the package, but still only the one netdb.h file?

Tried copying the missing files from Fedora 27 to the directory, and it gets 
thru the compile process with them, but then gets errors during the link 
process, since the libraries must be missing something?


++
 Michael D. Setzer II - Computer Science Instructor (Retired) 
 mailto:mi...@guam.net
 mailto:msetze...@gmail.com
 Guam - Where America's Day Begins
 G4L Disk Imaging Project maintainer 
 http://sourceforge.net/projects/g4l/
++

http://setiathome.berkeley.edu (Original)
Number of Seti Units Returned:  19,471
Processing time:  32 years, 290 days, 12 hours, 58 minutes
(Total Hours: 287,489)

BOINC@HOME CREDITS

ROSETTA  65580841.228635 | ABC  16613838.513356
SETI109389968.364809 | EINSTEIN141159057.499240
___
users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/FSIOXJ7DPXZRMRC5GCEL5MKZ475QR36D/


Re: 132 packages were deleted from my system

2018-07-16 Thread Michael D. Setzer II
On 16 Jul 2018 at 18:35, pgaltieri wrote:

From:   pgaltieri 
Date sent:  Mon, 16 Jul 2018 18:35:48 -0700
Subject:132 packages were deleted from my system
To: Community support for Fedora users 
Send reply to:  Community support for Fedora users 


> 
> I just discovered that a whole bunch of packages just got deleted from my F27 
> system after doing 
> an update. This happened on 2 different systems. I discovered this after I 
> had to reboot one of 
> them because the laptop screen went blank. After rebooting it never went to 
> graphics mode. I 
> discovered then that the gdm package had been deleted. I then looked at the 
> dnf.log file and it 
> shows that 12 packages were updated and 119 packages were removed. WTF?
> 
> Paolo

Just saw the same thing on one of my systems that still has Fedora 27, but I 
stopped it before letting it do the changes?? Seems soundtouch is the 
problem. There is a new version, but I had a 159 packages that needed the 
older version, so it was going to remove all of them to all the upgrade???


Dependencies resolved.
==
==
 Package   Arch   VersionRepository
   Size
==
==
Upgrading:
 soundtouchx86_64 2.0.0-3.fc27   updates   72 k
Removing dependent packages:
 anaconda  x86_64 27.20.4-6.fc27 @updates   0  
 anaconda-gui  x86_64 27.20.4-6.fc27 @updates 1.3 M
 atril x86_64 1.20.2-1.fc27  @updates 4.4 M
 atril-cajax86_64 1.20.2-1.fc27  @updates  24 k
 atril-libsx86_64 1.20.2-1.fc27  @updates 1.0 M
 audacious x86_64 3.9-1.fc27 @fedora  1.2 M

- Lots more 

 wireshark x86_64 1:2.6.1-1.fc27 @updates   0  
 wireshark-gtk x86_64 1:2.6.1-1.fc27 @updates 2.2 M
 wireshark-qt  x86_64 1:2.6.1-1.fc27 @updates 7.4 M
 wxGTK3-webviewx86_64 3.0.3-5.fc27   @fedora  151 k
 yelp  x86_64 2:3.26.0-1.fc27@fedora  2.2 M
 yelp-libs x86_64 2:3.26.0-1.fc27@fedora  310 k

Transaction Summary
==
==
Upgrade1 Package
Remove   159 Packages

Total download size: 72 k






+----------------+
 Michael D. Setzer II - Computer Science Instructor (Retired) 
 mailto:mi...@guam.net
 mailto:msetze...@gmail.com
 Guam - Where America's Day Begins
 G4L Disk Imaging Project maintainer 
 http://sourceforge.net/projects/g4l/
++

http://setiathome.berkeley.edu (Original)
Number of Seti Units Returned:  19,471
Processing time:  32 years, 290 days, 12 hours, 58 minutes
(Total Hours: 287,489)

BOINC@HOME CREDITS

ROSETTA  65607730.220592 | ABC  16613838.513356
SETI109427153.020787 | EINSTEIN141208479.499240
___
users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/L3P42MRVMD24L7UIOQWGCVJ3FAVEPZJ4/


Re: clone

2018-07-27 Thread Michael D. Setzer II
On 27 Jul 2018 at 10:57, ToddAndMargo wrote:

Subject:Re: clone
To: users@lists.fedoraproject.org
From:   ToddAndMargo 
Date sent:  Fri, 27 Jul 2018 10:57:46 -0700
Send reply to:  Community support for Fedora users 


> On 07/26/2018 05:21 PM, Patrick Dupre wrote:
> > Hello,
> > 
> > I did this ton of times, but this time, it does not work.
> > I even just did it last week on an EFI system without problem
> > Before updating my system (now in fedora 26), I cloned by using another 
> > live system.
> > cp -a /root1 /root2 (after mke2fs)
> > cp -a /boot1 /boot2
> > The /home /tmp are on other partitions
> > /root1 has the entire system
> > and /boot is a boot partition
> > I modified the fstab file properly
> > and I run grub2-mkconfig
> > The new system is detected properly (I can also edit grub.cfg to try to boot
> > on the right partition)
> > 
> > But, I cannot boot on /root2 (using the /boot1 or /boot2)
> > 
> > Is is a relabeling issue?
> > 
> > How can I relabel from grub2 ?
> > It seems that using touch /root1/.autorelabel
> > I can only relabel the partition /root1 (and not /root2)
> > 
> > As I said, I did this tens of times.
> > 
> > Thank.
> > 
> 
> Hi Patrick,
> 
> I don not know if this will help, but what the heck ...
> 
> I have tried manually doing clones with dd and had no success
> whatsoever.
> 
> That being said, I use Clonezilla on weekly basis and it
> works wonderfully.
> 
> https://clonezilla.org/downloads.php
> 

Seen thread but on Vacation, so only have remote access to main systems.
I maintain the G4L disk imaging project, and its primary backup uses dd and 
default lzop compression to make image files. 
It does have a clone option that makes disk to disk clones, but one issue that 
sometimes happens. If you do a disk clone the block ids of the disks are the 
same, and if ones loader is using blkids to load partitions, it is confused, 
since each disk is suppose to have different block ids. 
In my classroom, I had 20 systems, and would broadcast using udpcast to 
the other 19 systems, but since all machines were separate no issues on 
boot. 
Had a user do a clone in same machine to another disk, and did allow 
booting from either disk. He could boot from either disk if he disconnected 
the other.
He manually changed the block id on cloned disk, and modified the grub.cfg 
and then it worked fine.

I generally make compressed images to an ftp server or external usb device.
G4L can be added to the boot options, and run from ram after loading from 
/boot.

So, another 2 cents.

> The iso cuts beautifully to a flash drive with dd
> 
> -T
> ___
> users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org
> To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
> Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html
> List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
> List Archives: 
> https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/HGCWHOUBRA4GSKF7DI5EKPCFNU7ZUGNN/


++
 Michael D. Setzer II - Computer Science Instructor (Retired) 
 mailto:mi...@guam.net
 mailto:msetze...@gmail.com
 Guam - Where America's Day Begins
 G4L Disk Imaging Project maintainer 
 http://sourceforge.net/projects/g4l/
++

http://setiathome.berkeley.edu (Original)
Number of Seti Units Returned:  19,471
Processing time:  32 years, 290 days, 12 hours, 58 minutes
(Total Hours: 287,489)

BOINC@HOME CREDITS

ROSETTA  65618572.246315 | ABC  16613838.513356
SETI109441642.939754 | EINSTEIN141229339.499240
___
users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/WCEBU7JGFD3JEEUAP2F2TVAWP3NVRSCG/


Re: OT: fastest way to copy one drive to another

2018-09-06 Thread Michael D. Setzer II
A number of good replies already, but just to add a note:
I've been the maintainer of the g4l disk imaging project since 2004, and it 
basically uses dd for most operations.

First thing, it will take a long time to do a clone of the disks.
Don't expect to get the speed that the drive reports, since that is the 
buffered 
speed. In doing an clone image, the buffer is filled almost immediately, and 
then you will be getting the physical speed.

On this machines I get the cached speed of about 100 times faster than the 
physical speed. So, that is what you will probable end up getting for the 
process.

hdparm -Tt /dev/sda

/dev/sda:
 Timing cached reads:   6104 MB in  2.00 seconds = 3053.12 MB/sec
 Timing buffered disk reads:  106 MB in  3.07 seconds =  34.53 MB/sec

As mentioned by others, the 2nd disk will need to be the same size or larger. 
Sometimes the exact same disks can have different sizes because of bad 
sectors. Had 20 new machines in classroom once, and drives all the same 
make and model, but one system reported smaller size. Was able to image 
that system to all the others with no issues.

dd_rescue is a good program if there are any bad sectors or problem 
sectors, since it will try to work around them. It is included on the g4l disk.

I generally add g4l to the grub boot by using the 40_custom file.
Just copy the latest kernel and ramdisk.lzma file into the /boot directory
and then make a new grub.cfg file, and it is an option on boot.
Also, can be run from cd or usb.

# !/bin/sh
exec tail -n +3 $0
# This file provides an easy way to add custom menu entries.  Simply type 
the
# menu entries you want to add after this comment.  Be careful not to change
# the 'exec tail' line above.
menuentry G4L {
linux /bz4x18.5 root=/dev/ram0 telnetd=yes
initrd /ramdisk.lzma
}

menuentry G4L_NOSMP {
linux /bz4x18.5 root=/dev/ram0 telnetd=yes nosmp
initrd /ramdisk.lzma
}

menuentry G4L_FailSafe {
linux /bz4x18.5 root=/dev/ram0 noapic noacpi pnpbios=off acpi=off 
pci=noacpi nosmp
initrd /ramdisk.lzma
}

Another issue that causes problems. If you make a clone image of the disks, 
you should not reboot the machine with both disks, since they will report the 
same blkids for the different disks since they are now identical. 

In the past, it wasn't a problem, since one disk would be /dev/sda and the 
other /dev/sdb, but most systems now use the blkid system, so have two 
disks with the same ids causes issues.

Well, just some things to mention.
Good Luck.



On 6 Sep 2018 at 19:20, Ranjan Maitra wrote:

Date sent:  Thu, 6 Sep 2018 19:20:37 -0500
From:   Ranjan Maitra 
To: Community support for Fedora users 

Subject:OT: fastest way to copy one drive to another
Organization:   Mailbox Ignored
Send reply to:  users@lists.fedoraproject.org

> Hi,
> 
> I have two drives mounted on a F28 system. Both are identical 4TB drives. The 
> second one is empty. I am concerned about the first one failing so would like 
> to copy the contents (which are around 3.7 TB) to the second. 
> 
> What is the fastest way to copy the contents of the first drive to the 
> second? I was using rsync, but is there a better way?
> 
> Many thanks in advance for any advice,
> Ranjan
> 
> 
> -- 
> Important Notice: This mailbox is ignored: e-mails are set to be deleted on 
> receipt. Please respond to the mailing list if appropriate. For those needing 
> to send personal or professional e-mail, please use appropriate addresses.
> ___
> users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org
> To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
> Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html
> List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
> List Archives: 
> https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org


++
 Michael D. Setzer II - Computer Science Instructor (Retired) 
 mailto:mi...@guam.net
 mailto:msetze...@gmail.com
 Guam - Where America's Day Begins
 G4L Disk Imaging Project maintainer 
 http://sourceforge.net/projects/g4l/
++

http://setiathome.berkeley.edu (Original)
Number of Seti Units Returned:  19,471
Processing time:  32 years, 290 days, 12 hours, 58 minutes
(Total Hours: 287,489)

BOINC@HOME CREDITS

ROSETTA  65776394.242111 | ABC  16613838.513356
SETI109511779.106103 | EINSTEIN141373538.499240
___
users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code 

Re: OT: fastest way to copy one drive to another

2018-09-07 Thread Michael D. Setzer II
On 7 Sep 2018 at 15:54, Ranjan Maitra wrote:

Date sent:  Fri, 7 Sep 2018 15:54:59 -0500
From:   Ranjan Maitra 
To: users@lists.fedoraproject.org
Subject:Re: OT: fastest way to copy one drive to another
Organization:   Mailbox Ignored
Send reply to:  users@lists.fedoraproject.org

> On Fri, 7 Sep 2018 16:37:49 -0400 Tony Nelson  
> wrote:
> 
> > On 18-09-07 15:48:23, jdow wrote:
> > 
> > > dd if=/dev/ of=/dev/ bs=1073741824  
> > > conv=sparse,noerror & pid=$!
> > 
> > bs=1M
> > 
> 
> Btw, do the drives have to be unmounted? Just making sure.

Drives should not be mounted at time, or changes could be made during the 
copying process.

The line for the cloning process in my g4l is like this.
dd bs=1M if=$clonesource 2>/dev/null |jetcat-mod -f 5000 -p $clonesize 
2>$progout |dd bs=1M of=$clonetarget 2>/dev/null &

Uses a dialog script to set the variables, and then runs the copy command in 
background. The foreground script takes the data written to the progout file 
and displays a progress bar via dialog. 

Be very careful to make sure you copy the correct drive to the correct drive, 
since if you get it wrong you loose it all.  


> 
> Thanks,
> Ranjan
> ___
> users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org
> To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
> Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html
> List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
> List Archives: 
> https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org


++
 Michael D. Setzer II - Computer Science Instructor (Retired) 
 mailto:mi...@guam.net
 mailto:msetze...@gmail.com
 Guam - Where America's Day Begins
 G4L Disk Imaging Project maintainer 
 http://sourceforge.net/projects/g4l/
++

http://setiathome.berkeley.edu (Original)
Number of Seti Units Returned:  19,471
Processing time:  32 years, 290 days, 12 hours, 58 minutes
(Total Hours: 287,489)

BOINC@HOME CREDITS

ROSETTA  65778205.643098 | ABC  16613838.513356
SETI109514958.178814 | EINSTEIN141374481.499240
___
users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org


Re: OT: fastest way to copy one drive to another

2018-09-07 Thread Michael D. Setzer II
On 7 Sep 2018 at 15:56, JD wrote:

Date sent:  Fri, 07 Sep 2018 15:56:21 -0600
From:   JD 
To: users@lists.fedoraproject.org
Subject:Re: OT: fastest way to copy one drive to another
Send reply to:  Community support for Fedora users 


> 
> 
> On 09/07/2018 03:34 PM, Michael D. Setzer II wrote:
> > On 7 Sep 2018 at 15:54, Ranjan Maitra wrote:
> >
> > Date sent:  Fri, 7 Sep 2018 15:54:59 -0500
> > From:   Ranjan Maitra 
> > To: users@lists.fedoraproject.org
> > Subject:Re: OT: fastest way to copy one drive to another
> > Organization:   Mailbox Ignored
> > Send reply to:  users@lists.fedoraproject.org
> >
> >> On Fri, 7 Sep 2018 16:37:49 -0400 Tony Nelson 
> >>  wrote:
> >>
> >>> On 18-09-07 15:48:23, jdow wrote:
> >>>
> >>>> dd if=/dev/ of=/dev/ bs=1073741824
> >>>> conv=sparse,noerror & pid=$!
> >>> bs=1M
> >>>
> >> Btw, do the drives have to be unmounted? Just making sure.
> > Drives should not be mounted at time, or changes could be made during the
> > copying process.
> >
> > The line for the cloning process in my g4l is like this.
> > dd bs=1M if=$clonesource 2>/dev/null |jetcat-mod -f 5000 -p $clonesize
> > 2>$progout |dd bs=1M of=$clonetarget 2>/dev/null &
> >
> > Uses a dialog script to set the variables, and then runs the copy command in
> > background. The foreground script takes the data written to the progout file
> > and displays a progress bar via dialog.
> >
> > Be very careful to make sure you copy the correct drive to the correct 
> > drive,
> > since if you get it wrong you loose it all.
> >
> Michael D. Setzer II,
> What is the purpose of inserting the utility
> jetcat-mod  between the 2 dd commands?
> 

The jetcat-mod is a filter that monitors the process of the copy, and outputs 
the info every 5 seconds with this option. The dialog then displays a running 
graph of the progress along with estimated speed. In the clone case there is 
no compression, so the rate is generally the physical speed of disk. With 
image files that are compressed, the effective speed can vary greatly 
depending on how much the data was compressed. Mostly just gives 
progress versus just waiting for the dd command to finish.



> ___
> users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org
> To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
> Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html
> List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
> List Archives: 
> https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org


++
 Michael D. Setzer II - Computer Science Instructor (Retired) 
 mailto:mi...@guam.net
 mailto:msetze...@gmail.com
 Guam - Where America's Day Begins
 G4L Disk Imaging Project maintainer 
 http://sourceforge.net/projects/g4l/
++

http://setiathome.berkeley.edu (Original)
Number of Seti Units Returned:  19,471
Processing time:  32 years, 290 days, 12 hours, 58 minutes
(Total Hours: 287,489)

BOINC@HOME CREDITS

ROSETTA  65778205.643098 | ABC  16613838.513356
SETI109514958.178814 | EINSTEIN141374481.499240
___
users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org


Re: OT: fastest way to copy one drive to another

2018-09-08 Thread Michael D. Setzer II
On 8 Sep 2018 at 10:01, Alexander Dalloz wrote:

Subject:Re: OT: fastest way to copy one drive to another
To: users@lists.fedoraproject.org
From:   Alexander Dalloz 
Date sent:  Sat, 8 Sep 2018 10:01:11 +0200
Send reply to:  Community support for Fedora users 


> Am 08.09.2018 um 00:38 schrieb Michael D. Setzer II:
> > The jetcat-mod is a filter that monitors the process of the copy, and 
> > outputs
> > the info every 5 seconds with this option. The dialog then displays a 
> > running
> > graph of the progress along with estimated speed. In the clone case there is
> > no compression, so the rate is generally the physical speed of disk. With
> > image files that are compressed, the effective speed can vary greatly
> > depending on how much the data was compressed. Mostly just gives
> > progress versus just waiting for the dd command to finish.
> 
> Why no just dd parameter "status=progress"?
> 

Back in 2004, don't think status had progress as an option at all?
Second the format of the status is different, and reports on bytes and the 
output to screen comes at different rates, and is on the same line over and 
over.
Third, it doesn't have any relationship to the size of what is being copied in 
the data or time.

Did a test with an approximat 8G file

time dd bs=1M if=e-2009-02-22.lzo 2>/dev/null | /jetcat-mod -f 5000 -p 
8780465 | dd bs=1M of=testx.x 2>/dev/null
1.63% 140.00MB of 8574.67MB time: 0:00:03  46.67MB/sec
7.00% 600.00MB of 8574.67MB time: 0:00:08  75.00MB/sec
11.66%   1000.00MB of 8574.67MB time: 0:00:13  76.92MB/sec
16.93%   1452.00MB of 8574.67MB time: 0:00:18  80.67MB/sec
20.34%   1744.00MB of 8574.67MB time: 0:00:23  75.83MB/sec
23.65%   2028.00MB of 8574.67MB time: 0:00:28  72.43MB/sec
25.98%   2228.00MB of 8574.67MB time: 0:00:33  67.52MB/sec
29.16%   2500.00MB of 8574.67MB time: 0:00:38  65.79MB/sec
31.39%   2692.00MB of 8574.67MB time: 0:00:43  62.60MB/sec
33.96%   2912.00MB of 8574.67MB time: 0:00:48  60.67MB/sec
36.25%   3108.00MB of 8574.67MB time: 0:00:53  58.64MB/sec
39.51%   3388.00MB of 8574.67MB time: 0:00:58  58.41MB/sec
41.66%   3572.00MB of 8574.67MB time: 0:01:03  56.70MB/sec
45.02%   3860.00MB of 8574.67MB time: 0:01:08  56.76MB/sec
47.16%   4044.00MB of 8574.67MB time: 0:01:13  55.40MB/sec
49.96%   4284.00MB of 8574.67MB time: 0:01:18  54.92MB/sec
52.57%   4508.00MB of 8574.67MB time: 0:01:23  54.31MB/sec
55.23%   4736.00MB of 8574.67MB time: 0:01:28  53.82MB/sec
57.24%   4908.00MB of 8574.67MB time: 0:01:33  52.77MB/sec
59.62%   5112.00MB of 8574.67MB time: 0:01:38  52.16MB/sec
62.23%   5336.00MB of 8574.67MB time: 0:01:43  51.81MB/sec
64.94%   5568.00MB of 8574.67MB time: 0:01:48  51.56MB/sec
67.64%   5800.00MB of 8574.67MB time: 0:01:53  51.33MB/sec
70.72%   6064.00MB of 8574.67MB time: 0:01:58  51.39MB/sec
73.38%   6292.00MB of 8574.67MB time: 0:02:03  51.15MB/sec
76.18%   6532.00MB of 8574.67MB time: 0:02:08  51.03MB/sec
78.93%   6768.00MB of 8574.67MB time: 0:02:13  50.89MB/sec
81.26%   6968.00MB of 8574.67MB time: 0:02:18  50.49MB/sec
84.06%   7208.00MB of 8574.67MB time: 0:02:23  50.41MB/sec
86.81%   7444.00MB of 8574.67MB time: 0:02:28  50.30MB/sec
87.93%   7540.00MB of 8574.67MB time: 0:02:33  49.28MB/sec
90.31%   7744.00MB of 8574.67MB time: 0:02:38  49.01MB/sec
93.44%   8012.00MB of 8574.67MB time: 0:02:43  49.15MB/sec
95.16%   8160.00MB of 8574.67MB time: 0:02:48  48.57MB/sec
100.00%  8373.71MB of 8574.67MB time: 0:02:52  48.68MB/sec
100

real2m51.646s
user0m0.817s
sys 1m18.394s

time dd bs=1M if=e-2009-02-22.lzo of=testx.x status=progress
8767143936 bytes (8.8 GB, 8.2 GiB) copied, 158 s, 55.5 MB/s
8373+1 records in
8373+1 records out
8780465661 bytes (8.8 GB, 8.2 GiB) copied, 158.455 s, 55.4 MB/s

real2m38.507s
user0m0.110s
sys 0m47.135s

The dd with progress was about 13 seconds faster, but doesn't show  
percentages or time info. 

The dialog progress bar uses the lines created every 5 seconds to show info 
and bar. 
Note: I just put the file size in the line, which wasn't in the correct format, 
size 
I just dropped the last 3 digits of byte  instead of converting it to K value.

Tried to post a message with an example of bar, but it is currently on hold 
since the 28K image file result in message being larger than 60K, which is 
the list limit. 

The info doesn't make a difference in the image, and is only to give progress 
info.


> Alexander
> ___
> users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org
> To u

Re: OT: fastest way to copy one drive to another

2018-09-08 Thread Michael D. Setzer II
On 8 Sep 2018 at 11:50, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:

Subject:Re: OT: fastest way to copy one drive to another
From:   Patrick O'Callaghan 
To: users@lists.fedoraproject.org
Date sent:  Sat, 08 Sep 2018 11:50:08 +0100
Send reply to:  Community support for Fedora users 


> On Sat, 2018-09-08 at 08:38 +1000, Michael D. Setzer II wrote:
> > The jetcat-mod is a filter that monitors the process of the copy, and 
> > outputs 
> > the info every 5 seconds with this option. The dialog then displays a 
> > running 
> > graph of the progress along with estimated speed. In the clone case there 
> > is 
> > no compression, so the rate is generally the physical speed of disk. With 
> > image files that are compressed, the effective speed can vary greatly 
> > depending on how much the data was compressed. Mostly just gives 
> > progress versus just waiting for the dd command to finish.
> 
> The only results I see from Google refer to actual jet engines, so I
> ask again, where does this come from?
> 
It is a c program that was included with g4l when I took it over, but then I 
rewrote it to do only what was actually used by the project.

It's included with the complete source code on sourceforge with the project 
source.


> poc
> ___
> users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org
> To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
> Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html
> List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
> List Archives: 
> https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org


++
 Michael D. Setzer II - Computer Science Instructor (Retired) 
 mailto:mi...@guam.net
 mailto:msetze...@gmail.com
 Guam - Where America's Day Begins
 G4L Disk Imaging Project maintainer 
 http://sourceforge.net/projects/g4l/
++

http://setiathome.berkeley.edu (Original)
Number of Seti Units Returned:  19,471
Processing time:  32 years, 290 days, 12 hours, 58 minutes
(Total Hours: 287,489)

BOINC@HOME CREDITS

ROSETTA  65778205.643098 | ABC  16613838.513356
SETI109514958.178814 | EINSTEIN141374481.499240
___
users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org


Re: OT: fastest way to copy one drive to another

2018-09-08 Thread Michael D. Setzer II
On 8 Sep 2018 at 20:23, Ed Greshko wrote:

From:   Ed Greshko 
Subject:Re: OT: fastest way to copy one drive to another
To: users@lists.fedoraproject.org
Date sent:  Sat, 8 Sep 2018 20:23:45 +0800
Send reply to:  Community support for Fedora users 


> On 9/8/18 6:50 PM, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
> > On Sat, 2018-09-08 at 08:38 +1000, Michael D. Setzer II wrote:
> >> The jetcat-mod is a filter that monitors the process of the copy, and 
> >> outputs the
> >> info every 5 seconds with this option. The dialog then displays a running 
> >> graph of
> >> the progress along with estimated speed. In the clone case there is no
> >> compression, so the rate is generally the physical speed of disk. With 
> >> image files
> >> that are compressed, the effective speed can vary greatly depending on how 
> >> much
> >> the data was compressed. Mostly just gives progress versus just waiting 
> >> for the dd
> >> command to finish. 
> > The only results I see from Google refer to actual jet engines, so I ask 
> > again,
> > where does this come from? 
> 
> I know what you mean.
> 
> I avoid using commands/tools/utilities that aren't part of the Fedora 
> distributions
> when answering queries on the mailing list.
> 
> The exception would be commands/tools/utilities which are easily installed 
> from other
> well-known repos.  I try and
> take care to mention the repo they can been installed from.
> 
> I try my best not to keep people guessing.  And if I do, I give the links to 
> where
> something can be found.
> 

The link is in the footer of every message I send???
Joined a Fedora Mentoring list long ago, but it must have been a dead list. 
Got a welcome message, but then message to list gave no responses.

> One of the not so nice things I've seen happen is people, not the most 
> experienced,
> install non-standard stuff on their systems and then forget they've done it.  
> And
> then they complain when stuff that worked for them before no longer works as 
> an
> upgrade changes a library that is no longer compatible.
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 


++
 Michael D. Setzer II - Computer Science Instructor (Retired) 
 mailto:mi...@guam.net
 mailto:msetze...@gmail.com
 Guam - Where America's Day Begins
 G4L Disk Imaging Project maintainer 
 http://sourceforge.net/projects/g4l/
++

http://setiathome.berkeley.edu (Original)
Number of Seti Units Returned:  19,471
Processing time:  32 years, 290 days, 12 hours, 58 minutes
(Total Hours: 287,489)

BOINC@HOME CREDITS

ROSETTA  65778205.643098 | ABC  16613838.513356
SETI109514958.178814 | EINSTEIN141374481.499240
___
users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org


Re: OT: fastest way to copy one drive to another

2018-09-08 Thread Michael D. Setzer II
On 8 Sep 2018 at 17:10, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:

Subject:Re: OT: fastest way to copy one drive to another
From:   Patrick O'Callaghan 
To: users@lists.fedoraproject.org
Date sent:  Sat, 08 Sep 2018 17:10:05 +0100
Send reply to:  Community support for Fedora users 


> On Sat, 2018-09-08 at 22:43 +1000, Michael D. Setzer II wrote:
> > On 8 Sep 2018 at 20:23, Ed Greshko wrote:
> > 
> > From:   Ed Greshko 
> > Subject:Re: OT: fastest way to copy one drive to another
> > To: users@lists.fedoraproject.org
> > Date sent:  Sat, 8 Sep 2018 20:23:45 +0800
> > Send reply to:  Community support for Fedora users 
> > 
> > 
> > > On 9/8/18 6:50 PM, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
> > > > On Sat, 2018-09-08 at 08:38 +1000, Michael D. Setzer II wrote:
> > > > > The jetcat-mod is a filter that monitors the process of the copy, and 
> > > > > outputs the
> > > > > info every 5 seconds with this option. The dialog then displays a 
> > > > > running graph of
> > > > > the progress along with estimated speed. In the clone case there is no
> > > > > compression, so the rate is generally the physical speed of disk. 
> > > > > With image files
> > > > > that are compressed, the effective speed can vary greatly depending 
> > > > > on how much
> > > > > the data was compressed. Mostly just gives progress versus just 
> > > > > waiting for the dd
> > > > > command to finish. 
> > > > 
> > > > The only results I see from Google refer to actual jet engines, so I 
> > > > ask again,
> > > > where does this come from? 
> > > 
> > > I know what you mean.
> > > 
> > > I avoid using commands/tools/utilities that aren't part of the Fedora 
> > > distributions
> > > when answering queries on the mailing list.
> > > 
> > > The exception would be commands/tools/utilities which are easily 
> > > installed from other
> > > well-known repos.  I try and
> > > take care to mention the repo they can been installed from.
> > > 
> > > I try my best not to keep people guessing.  And if I do, I give the links 
> > > to where
> > > something can be found.
> > > 
> > 
> > The link is in the footer of every message I send???
> > Joined a Fedora Mentoring list long ago, but it must have been a dead list. 
> > Got a welcome message, but then message to list gave no responses.
> 
> The link in the footer points to g4l, but nothing in your message
> mentioning jetcat-mod makes that connection. Only an off-list message
> from you explained it, and you then repeated the information on-list.
> 

In my original message to the thread I specified that I had been the 
maintainer of the g4l disk imaging project since 2004, and made some 
comments. Later there was talk of using dd to do the copy, and I pulled the 
one line from the 2000+ line script that specifically does the clone copy 
process. 

The entire project is on sourceforge with the source code. Project is 
completely free, no paid options, no donations. Just an option that some 
might find useful. 

Wasn't trying to force it on anyone, and just sharing what I had seen over the 
years. 


> poc
> ___
> users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org
> To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
> Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html
> List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
> List Archives: 
> https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org


++
 Michael D. Setzer II - Computer Science Instructor (Retired) 
 mailto:mi...@guam.net
 mailto:msetze...@gmail.com
 Guam - Where America's Day Begins
 G4L Disk Imaging Project maintainer 
 http://sourceforge.net/projects/g4l/
++

http://setiathome.berkeley.edu (Original)
Number of Seti Units Returned:  19,471
Processing time:  32 years, 290 days, 12 hours, 58 minutes
(Total Hours: 287,489)

BOINC@HOME CREDITS

ROSETTA  65779701.987238 | ABC  16613838.513356
SETI109517999.255698 | EINSTEIN141376685.499240
___
users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org


Re: OT: fastest way to copy one drive to another

2018-09-11 Thread Michael D. Setzer II
On 10 Sep 2018 at 19:05, wwp wrote:

Date sent:  Mon, 10 Sep 2018 19:05:13 +0200
From:   wwp 
To: users@lists.fedoraproject.org
Subject:Re: OT: fastest way to copy one drive to another
Send reply to:  Community support for Fedora users 


> Hello Michael,
> 
> 
> On Fri, 07 Sep 2018 13:00:17 +1000 "Michael D. Setzer II" 
>  wrote:
> 
> > A number of good replies already, but just to add a note:
> > I've been the maintainer of the g4l disk imaging project since 2004, and it 
> > basically uses dd for most operations.
> 
> I'm replying, not only OT to the ML but OT to this thread, because I've
> just experimented g4l for backing up several windows systems (for Linux
> boxes I run my own rsync-based scripts) and wanted to share that. The
> process was pretty simple: shutting them down, booting from the USB storage
> where g4l resides (either legacy or UEFI mode), configured the process
> to send to a FTP server over the LAN. The process is reliable and
> pretty fast, approx 2h for each 500GB disk (RAW copy mode), I though
> it would be longer. The only thing I added is generating a .md5 file on
> storage, in case, that should be done by g4l IMO.
For testing the image, since it is a compressed file and lzop and gzip both 
have a option to check the archive (-t) and it is a 32bit check, so don't know 
what adding a .md5 file to confirm the file versus checking the image. Did 
once have a brand new server that I was creating images on, and they were 
corrupt. Ran an memtest on system, and it turned out one of brand new 
512M modules had an error that passed the first 7 tests with no error, but 
failed on the 8 test pattern. So in the docs recommend always using the 
compression program test to validate the image.

> 
> My former experience were using a similar approach but with clonezilla
> (in that time, no FTP sending but local storage or at least I couldn't
> find it, and a slower process, less simple at least, partition by
> partition and a user interface that is prone to user error), which led
> me to back my Windows systems up way less often.
> 

Generally recommend a full disk image the first time, the ntfsclone option 
only backs up used data on ntfs partitions, so is usually faster. 
G4L can be booted from a windows disk using grub4dos, was easy to add 
with 95 and 98 and XP as a boot option, 7 and above require making the 
grub4dos the primary boot manager, and you have to do some tricks in 
renaming files. 

Thanks for the info. There is a doc file on sourceforge, but not many 
download it.

Working on version 0.55, and just did alpha 48. Just had a typhoon pass, and 
power was out for 23 hours, so just getting back online. Had 192 emails.



> IOW, Michael, thanks for providing g4l!
> 
> 
> Regards,
> 
> -- 
> wwp
> 


++
 Michael D. Setzer II - Computer Science Instructor (Retired) 
 mailto:mi...@guam.net
 mailto:msetze...@gmail.com
 Guam - Where America's Day Begins
 G4L Disk Imaging Project maintainer 
 http://sourceforge.net/projects/g4l/
++

http://setiathome.berkeley.edu (Original)
Number of Seti Units Returned:  19,471
Processing time:  32 years, 290 days, 12 hours, 58 minutes
(Total Hours: 287,489)

BOINC@HOME CREDITS

ROSETTA  65783064.026787 | ABC  16613838.513356
SETI109522169.740739 | EINSTEIN141379519.999240
___
users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org


Re: OT: fastest way to copy one drive to another

2018-09-13 Thread Michael D. Setzer II
On 13 Sep 2018 at 14:43, Roberto Ragusa wrote:

Subject:Re: OT: fastest way to copy one drive to another
To: users@lists.fedoraproject.org
From:   Roberto Ragusa 
Date sent:  Thu, 13 Sep 2018 14:43:51 +0200
Send reply to:  Community support for Fedora users 


> On 09/08/2018 01:34 PM, Michael D. Setzer II wrote:
> 
> > It is a c program that was included with g4l when I took it over, but then 
> > I 
> > rewrote it to do only what was actually used by the project.
> > 
> > It's included with the complete source code on sourceforge with the project 
> > source.
> 
> This is useful and may be worth a separate standalone package.
> 
> I usually use "pv" for pipe progress output.
> It apparently has buffer size option too, I'm discovering just now.

Wasn't aware of that program, and it seems to work with dialog.
Only issue I have, is that it is over 60+K in size, while the jetcat-mod is 
about 
8.5K. Since it is only working in ram, testing didn't show improvement making 
buffers larger, so use a 1M with the dd. Since once the disk buffer is full, it 
stays that way for most of the process. Perhaps with newer disks a larger 
buffer might increase speed a little.


jetcat-mod outputs lines ever 5 seconds by the option used, and has the 
format used by the dialog progress bar. G4L is using the dialog menu system 
along with the script for processing.
An output line looks like this.

47.16%   4044.00MB of 8574.67MB time: 0:01:13  55.40MB/sec

For the progress bar the first number is the critical part, rest is just 
displayed 
to show progress so far of the total size, elapsed time so far, and the 
calculated speed so far. With options that have compression, this can greatly 
increase the effective speed if unused space has been zeroed out.

With Fedora Core 3 long ago. Did a clean install on an 80G disk, and then 
did an image and it was 12G in sized. Cleared the unused space and redid 
image, and it dropped size to 2.5G.  Unused space with random data is still 
backed up and doesn't compress well.

Thanks for the info.

> 
> Regards.
> 
> -- 
>Roberto Ragusamail at robertoragusa.it
> ___
> users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org
> To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
> Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html
> List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
> List Archives: 
> https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org


++
 Michael D. Setzer II - Computer Science Instructor (Retired) 
 mailto:mi...@guam.net
 mailto:msetze...@gmail.com
 Guam - Where America's Day Begins
 G4L Disk Imaging Project maintainer 
 http://sourceforge.net/projects/g4l/
++

http://setiathome.berkeley.edu (Original)
Number of Seti Units Returned:  19,471
Processing time:  32 years, 290 days, 12 hours, 58 minutes
(Total Hours: 287,489)

BOINC@HOME CREDITS

ROSETTA  65786414.038490 | ABC  16613838.513356
SETI109526605.084600 | EINSTEIN141382979.499240
___
users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org


Re: copy /home on one laptop to another

2018-10-05 Thread Michael D. Setzer II
On 5 Oct 2018 at 18:30, Ranjan Maitra wrote:

Date sent:  Fri, 5 Oct 2018 18:30:57 -0500
From:   Ranjan Maitra 
To: Community support for Fedora users 

Subject:copy /home on one laptop to another
Organization:   Mailbox Ignored
Send reply to:  users@lists.fedoraproject.org

> Hi,
> 
> I have a new laptop and have installed F28 on it. The old laptop is also 
> running F28. I would like to copy /home from the old laptop to the second. 
> What would be the best way to do this? Both are on the network, but I am 
> hoping for a solution that does not go through the network.
> 
> Any suggestions?

Couple of questions.
1. Is this one user or many users?
2. Do the user(s) have the matching user numbers on the two machines?
3. Are you copying just data files or everything? There are a number of 
directories with start with . and they are not copied automatcially by some 
processes.

Some files might be in use if running from the hard disk OS, so might be 
better to boot from type of live cd, and do the copy, and then do the reverse 
on other system as well.

Could also use a cross-over cable, and connect machines directly, and 
transfer files.

Would also recommend a full backup before in case something doesn't work.
In imaging machines, there are some files that link to the MAC of the network 
card, and they would cause minor issues, but those are not in the /home 
directory.

Do an ls -a in the individual /home directories, and you will see the number of 
these special directories. 



> 
> Many thanks for any help and best wishes,
> Ranjan
> 
> -- 
> Important Notice: This mailbox is ignored: e-mails are set to be deleted on 
> receipt. Please respond to the mailing list if appropriate. For those needing 
> to send personal or professional e-mail, please use appropriate addresses.
> ___
> users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org
> To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
> Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html
> List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
> List Archives: 
> https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org


+--------+
 Michael D. Setzer II - Computer Science Instructor (Retired) 
 mailto:mi...@guam.net
 mailto:msetze...@gmail.com
 Guam - Where America's Day Begins
 G4L Disk Imaging Project maintainer 
 http://sourceforge.net/projects/g4l/
++

http://setiathome.berkeley.edu (Original)
Number of Seti Units Returned:  19,471
Processing time:  32 years, 290 days, 12 hours, 58 minutes
(Total Hours: 287,489)

BOINC@HOME CREDITS

ROSETTA  65921454.270086 | ABC  16613838.513356
SETI109583638.490525 | EINSTEIN141504762.499240
___
users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org


Structure needs cleaning?? What would be a better way to handle?

2018-10-20 Thread Michael D. Setzer II
I was doing a search of directories to see the sizes, and had some messages 
come up about Structure needs cleaning?

My original solution didn't work so well.
Files where in the /var/lib/yum/yumdb directory and the latest one was from 
2016.
Since it was part of the /  (root) partition /dev/sda2, I just did the 
touch /forcefsck and figured the reboot would then have it run a check on the 
disk.

The machine rebooted, and did the check, but failed at about 60+% and just 
dumped to a limited command prompt.

Was able to fix the problem, by booting to my g4l kernel that loads in ram 
from the grub menu. Was able to run fsck -f  /dev/sda2  and it reported the 
errors on these files in the /var/lib/yum/yumdb directory. 

Reboot, and machine came up fine. 
Had a number of entries and the lost+found.

So, question. 
1. Why wouldn't the boot fsck fix the problem without dumping to a command 
prompt?
2. Have a notebook that also has the fedora 28, but it was a clean install. It 
doesn't even have the /var/lib/yum/yumdb directory. So, am assumming that 
this was left over from system from serveral upgrades ago. 
3. Other than booting from another liveos type setup, is there a way to fix 
this 
kind of error.

Machine has been rebooted, but have never seen the error of Structure 
needing cleaning before. 

Thanks for any info.



+--------+
 Michael D. Setzer II - Computer Science Instructor (Retired) 
 mailto:mi...@guam.net
 mailto:msetze...@gmail.com
 Guam - Where America's Day Begins
 G4L Disk Imaging Project maintainer 
 http://sourceforge.net/projects/g4l/
++

http://setiathome.berkeley.edu (Original)
Number of Seti Units Returned:  19,471
Processing time:  32 years, 290 days, 12 hours, 58 minutes
(Total Hours: 287,489)

BOINC@HOME CREDITS

ROSETTA  65988428.399123 | ABC  16613838.513356
SETI109616354.655528 | EINSTEIN141576161.999240
___
users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org


Method to upgrade from live install to DVD install package setup?

2010-07-08 Thread Michael D. Setzer II
I installed Fedora 13 from the live CD and have found many packages 
missing that would be installed with the normal process from the DVD 
images. 

Normally, I do use the DVD and do a preupgrade on one test machine and a 
clean install on another and usually use the clean install setup after figuring 
all the differences. 

In this case, I am 17 timezones behind my normal location (GMT+10 to 
GMT-7), so don't have the access to systems I normally do. 

So, far I've installed the OpenOffice, Samba to get printing to a windows box, 
and found that ftp wasn't install by default?

Only solution might be to reinstall from a DVD image, but that means doing 
all the updates again.

Thanks.

+----------+
  Michael D. Setzer II -  Computer Science Instructor  
  Guam Community College  Computer Center  
  mailto:mi...@kuentos.guam.net
  mailto:msetze...@gmail.com
  http://www.guam.net/home/mikes
  Guam - Where America's Day Begins
+--+

http://setiathome.berkeley.edu (Original)
Number of Seti Units Returned:  19,471
Processing time:  32 years, 290 days, 12 hours, 58 minutes
(Total Hours: 287,489)

bo...@home CREDITS
SETI 9763292.210122   |   EINSTEIN 4142549.740851
ROSETTA  2027290.462519   |   ABC  1443090.360569

-- 
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines


Re: Method to upgrade from live install to DVD install package setup?

2010-07-08 Thread Michael D. Setzer II
On 8 Jul 2010 at 11:02, fedora wrote:

Date sent:  Thu, 08 Jul 2010 11:02:07 +0200
From:   fedora 
To: users@lists.fedoraproject.org
Subject:Re: Method to upgrade from live install to DVD install package 
setup?
Send reply to:  Community support for Fedora users 

<mailto:users-requ...@lists.fedoraproject.org?subject=unsubscribe>
<mailto:users-requ...@lists.fedoraproject.org?subject=subscribe>

> Can't you do a diff between the yum logs or anaconca.logs of both 
> installations and
> 
> yum install `cat /positive.diff`
> yum remove `cat /nevative.diff`
> 
> suomi

I generally do something like that when I am at the College, but at the 
moment, I am in the states for the summer, and only have one machine to 
work on. 

I am guessing that a lot of people might install from the CD image versus the 
DVD since that is the default download but then want to get more complete 
install without having to go thru the individual process of selecting each 
package, and without knowing all the packages it is a hit or miss. 

Thanks for the reply.



> 
> On 2010-07-08 10:04, Michael D. Setzer II wrote:
> > I installed Fedora 13 from the live CD and have found many packages
> > missing that would be installed with the normal process from the DVD
> > images.
> >
> > Normally, I do use the DVD and do a preupgrade on one test machine and a
> > clean install on another and usually use the clean install setup after 
> > figuring
> > all the differences.
> >
> > In this case, I am 17 timezones behind my normal location (GMT+10 to
> > GMT-7), so don't have the access to systems I normally do.
> >
> > So, far I've installed the OpenOffice, Samba to get printing to a windows 
> > box,
> > and found that ftp wasn't install by default?
> >
> > Only solution might be to reinstall from a DVD image, but that means doing
> > all the updates again.
> >
> > Thanks.
> >
> > +--+
> >Michael D. Setzer II -  Computer Science Instructor
> >Guam Community College  Computer Center
> >mailto:mi...@kuentos.guam.net
> >mailto:msetze...@gmail.com
> >http://www.guam.net/home/mikes
> >Guam - Where America's Day Begins
> > +--+
> >
> > http://setiathome.berkeley.edu (Original)
> > Number of Seti Units Returned:  19,471
> > Processing time:  32 years, 290 days, 12 hours, 58 minutes
> > (Total Hours: 287,489)
> >
> > bo...@home CREDITS
> > SETI 9763292.210122   |   EINSTEIN 4142549.740851
> > ROSETTA  2027290.462519   |   ABC  1443090.360569
> >
> -- 
> users mailing list
> users@lists.fedoraproject.org
> To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
> https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
> Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines


+--+
  Michael D. Setzer II -  Computer Science Instructor  
  Guam Community College  Computer Center  
  mailto:mi...@kuentos.guam.net
  mailto:msetze...@gmail.com
  http://www.guam.net/home/mikes
  Guam - Where America's Day Begins
+--+

http://setiathome.berkeley.edu (Original)
Number of Seti Units Returned:  19,471
Processing time:  32 years, 290 days, 12 hours, 58 minutes
(Total Hours: 287,489)

bo...@home CREDITS
SETI 9763292.210122   |   EINSTEIN 4142549.740851
ROSETTA  2027290.462519   |   ABC  1443090.360569

-- 
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines


Fedora 13 - Shutdown works, but Restart Freezes??

2010-07-08 Thread Michael D. Setzer II
I installed Fedora 13 on a Gateway E2000 and have found that restart/reboot 
freezes, but a shutdown does a full power down correctly.

By default goes to the graphical screen, the same for both, but with 
shutdown, it says shutting down and then powers off. The restart shows the 
restarting message, but then stops responding. No keyboard lights change, 
no CTRL-ALT-DEL, nothing. Only a forced power off gets the machine going.

Tried it from a terminal window same results.
Tried reboot -f same results.
Even loaded busybox and used busybox reboot -f

Don't see anything in the log files...

It doesn't come up with an error on the reboot, so it seems to be shutting 
down correctly, but just not doing the final reboot process.

Thanks.

+--+
  Michael D. Setzer II -  Computer Science Instructor  
  Guam Community College  Computer Center  
  mailto:mi...@kuentos.guam.net
  mailto:msetze...@gmail.com
  http://www.guam.net/home/mikes
  Guam - Where America's Day Begins
+--+

http://setiathome.berkeley.edu (Original)
Number of Seti Units Returned:  19,471
Processing time:  32 years, 290 days, 12 hours, 58 minutes
(Total Hours: 287,489)

bo...@home CREDITS
SETI 9763292.210122   |   EINSTEIN 4142549.740851
ROSETTA  2027290.462519   |   ABC  1443090.360569

-- 
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines


Re: Fedora 13 - Shutdown works, but Restart Freezes??

2010-07-08 Thread Michael D. Setzer II
On 8 Jul 2010 at 15:18, Kevin Fenzi wrote:

Date sent:  Thu, 8 Jul 2010 15:18:34 -0600
From:   Kevin Fenzi 
To: users@lists.fedoraproject.org
Subject:Re: Fedora 13 - Shutdown works, but Restart Freezes??
Organization:   Scrye
Send reply to:  Community support for Fedora users 

<mailto:users-requ...@lists.fedoraproject.org?subject=unsubscribe>
<mailto:users-requ...@lists.fedoraproject.org?subject=subscribe>

> On Thu, 08 Jul 2010 14:02:51 -0700
> "Michael D. Setzer II"  wrote:
> 
> > I installed Fedora 13 on a Gateway E2000 and have found that
> > restart/reboot freezes, but a shutdown does a full power down
> > correctly.
> > 
> > By default goes to the graphical screen, the same for both, but with 
> > shutdown, it says shutting down and then powers off. The restart
> > shows the restarting message, but then stops responding. No keyboard
> > lights change, no CTRL-ALT-DEL, nothing. Only a forced power off gets
> > the machine going.
> > 
> > Tried it from a terminal window same results.
> > Tried reboot -f same results.
> > Even loaded busybox and used busybox reboot -f
> > 
> > Don't see anything in the log files...
> > 
> > It doesn't come up with an error on the reboot, so it seems to be
> > shutting down correctly, but just not doing the final reboot process.
> 
> Try the suggestions at: 
> 
> http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/KernelCommonProblems#System_hangs_on_reboot

The reboot=b seems to fix the problem, but the reboot option seems to work 
just fine with all the kernels I've built for my g4l project from kernel.org on 
the 
same machine, so why does the Fedora kernel do this?

Thanks.

> 
> kevin
> 


+--+
  Michael D. Setzer II -  Computer Science Instructor  
  Guam Community College  Computer Center  
  mailto:mi...@kuentos.guam.net
  mailto:msetze...@gmail.com
  http://www.guam.net/home/mikes
  Guam - Where America's Day Begins
+--+

http://setiathome.berkeley.edu (Original)
Number of Seti Units Returned:  19,471
Processing time:  32 years, 290 days, 12 hours, 58 minutes
(Total Hours: 287,489)

bo...@home CREDITS
SETI 9763292.210122   |   EINSTEIN 4142549.740851
ROSETTA  2027290.462519   |   ABC  1443090.360569

-- 
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines


Getting Fedora 12 to work with DVI Cable with Nvidia FX 5200 Card.

2010-02-17 Thread Michael D. Setzer II
I've just gotten some AMD 64 FX ASUS machines with Nvidia FX 5200 video 
cards. I got one machine a few days ago, and was able to get XP 32 and 
Fedora 12 64 running on the machine using the existing CRT monitors I 
have in the lab. These new machines have Flat Screen ACER monitors with 
21" screens, but all have the DVI cable verses VGA cables. The computers 
with these screens come up to the Grub menu, but then it disappears after 
loading Fedora. I tried loading the rpmfusion nvidia,  but it doesn't give a 
graphic screen, but seems to have a blinking cursor. Tried the blacklising of 
the noveau,  and then found a message about upgrading to a update testing 
xorg server, but turns out the released version seems to be the latest. 

Anyone know of a method of getting this video card to work with DVI cable?

Thanks.

+----------+
  Michael D. Setzer II -  Computer Science Instructor  
  Guam Community College  Computer Center  
  mailto:mi...@kuentos.guam.net
  mailto:msetze...@gmail.com
  http://www.guam.net/home/mikes
  Guam - Where America's Day Begins
+--+

http://setiathome.berkeley.edu (Original)
Number of Seti Units Returned:  19,471
Processing time:  32 years, 290 days, 12 hours, 58 minutes
(Total Hours: 287,489)

bo...@home CREDITS
SETI  9,380,660.442912 | EINSTEIN  3,761,862.320851
ROSETTA   1,696,099.646022 | ABC 107,217.537710

-- 
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines


Re: Getting Fedora 12 to work with DVI Cable with Nvidia FX 5200 Card.

2010-02-17 Thread Michael D. Setzer II
On 17 Feb 2010 at 8:30, Bruno Wolff III wrote:

Date sent:  Wed, 17 Feb 2010 08:30:59 -0600
From:   Bruno Wolff III 
To: "Michael D. Setzer II" 
Copies to:  users@lists.fedoraproject.org
Subject:Re: Getting Fedora 12 to work with DVI Cable with 
Nvidia 
FX 5200
Card.

> On Wed, Feb 17, 2010 at 23:09:23 +1000,
>   "Michael D. Setzer II"  wrote:
> > I've just gotten some AMD 64 FX ASUS machines with Nvidia FX 5200 video 
> > cards. I got one machine a few days ago, and was able to get XP 32 and 
> > Fedora 12 64 running on the machine using the existing CRT monitors I 
> > have in the lab. These new machines have Flat Screen ACER monitors with 
> > 21" screens, but all have the DVI cable verses VGA cables. The computers 
> > with these screens come up to the Grub menu, but then it disappears after 
> > loading Fedora. I tried loading the rpmfusion nvidia,  but it doesn't give 
> > a 
> > graphic screen, but seems to have a blinking cursor. Tried the blacklising 
> > of 
> > the noveau,  and then found a message about upgrading to a update testing 
> > xorg server, but turns out the released version seems to be the latest. 
> > 
> > Anyone know of a method of getting this video card to work with DVI cable?
> 
> I doubt it is using DVI cables directly causing the problem. I have seen
> issues for dual port cards falling back to the VGA port on the card because
> a monitor wasn't doing EDID and it thought there wasn't a monitor attached
> to the DVI port. But it's a pretty old monitor. Anything relatively recent
> should be doing proper EDID.
> 

First, Thanks for the quick reply. The monitor has a 2005 Label on the front, 
so I think they are old, but about a year newer than our current machines. 
The monitor does come up with a no signal message with the DVI after the 
boot gets further thru. The log file might show something, but don't know if 
they is a way around what it might show. I did boot the machine with the DVI 
cable and my G4L project and it works, but the quality seems to be much 
lower than with the VGA.

With the noveau blacklisted, the bar bootup process was also a lower quality, 
and then the no signal message would appear.


> You could look at Xorg.0.log and see what is being detected.


+--+
  Michael D. Setzer II -  Computer Science Instructor  
  Guam Community College  Computer Center  
  mailto:mi...@kuentos.guam.net
  mailto:msetze...@gmail.com
  http://www.guam.net/home/mikes
  Guam - Where America's Day Begins
+--+

http://setiathome.berkeley.edu (Original)
Number of Seti Units Returned:  19,471
Processing time:  32 years, 290 days, 12 hours, 58 minutes
(Total Hours: 287,489)

bo...@home CREDITS
SETI  9,380,660.442912 | EINSTEIN  3,761,862.320851
ROSETTA   1,696,099.646022 | ABC 107,217.537710

-- 
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines


Re: change HDD without Re-installing Fedora 12 ..!!!!

2010-02-20 Thread Michael D. Setzer II
On 20 Feb 2010 at 12:16, Jatin K wrote:

Date sent:  Sat, 20 Feb 2010 12:16:11 +0530
From:   Jatin K 
To: "Community assistance,
and advice for using Fedora." 
Subject:change HDD without Re-installing Fedora 12 ..
Send reply to:  Community support for Fedora users 

<mailto:users-
requ...@lists.fedoraproject.org?subject=unsubscribe>
<mailto:users-
requ...@lists.fedoraproject.org?subject=subscribe>

> Dear list
> 
> I'm using FC 12 x86_64 on my dell vostro 1520 notebook  with 160GB hdd 
> installed in it , now I want to upgrade the hdd from 160GB  to 320GB 
> 7200 RPM
> 
> is it possible to transfer fedora 12 from one hdd to another ?? I dont 
> want to re-install it as lots of software and configurations are there 
> in old one
> 
> is there any  way like ghost ( like in M$ environment ) for Linux or may 
> be something like that
> 
> 
> Thnx in advance
> 

You might also want to look at g4l. It does disk imaging and has a clone 
option for a disk to disk option.

The latest released version is on sourceforge,  but a later version is at
ftp://amd64gcc.dyndns.org/g4l-v0.33alpha12.iso

That is a bootable ISO image, but it can also be setup to run from the grub 
menu. 

I'm the current maintainer, and build it using my Fedora systems and use it 
for my classroom machines. 

Are you  using LVM or other setup?
In making an image, it will be the same size.If ext2/3/4 you could proable use 
parted magic to resize non-LVM partitions.




> -- 
>°v°
>   /(_)\
>^ ^  Jatin Khatri
> Registerd Linux user No #501175
> www.counter.li.org
> No M$
> 
> -- 
> users mailing list
> users@lists.fedoraproject.org
> To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
> https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
> Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines


+--+
  Michael D. Setzer II -  Computer Science Instructor  
  Guam Community College  Computer Center  
  mailto:mi...@kuentos.guam.net
  mailto:msetze...@gmail.com
  http://www.guam.net/home/mikes
  Guam - Where America's Day Begins
+--+

http://setiathome.berkeley.edu (Original)
Number of Seti Units Returned:  19,471
Processing time:  32 years, 290 days, 12 hours, 58 minutes
(Total Hours: 287,489)

bo...@home CREDITS
SETI  9,387,769.025659 | EINSTEIN  3,775,826.130851
ROSETTA   1,704,354.844311 | ABC 118,615.823709

-- 
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines


Re: where is my remaining space ????

2010-02-22 Thread Michael D. Setzer II
> Dear list
>
> I've installed 320GB hdd but  Disk Usage Analyzer shows the following
>
> Total filesystem capacity 288.6GB ( used 53.1 GB available 235.4 GB )
>
>320.00 GB
>
> - (minus)288.60 GB
> ---
>  31.40 GB  ( what about this missing space ...
> where is it ? )
>
>
> how do I utilize missing space of 31.40 GB ...where it has gone ??
>
>
> This is the output of fdisk -l
> -
> Device Boot  Start End  Blocks   Id  System
> /dev/sda1   *   1  26  204800   83  Linux
> Partition 1 does not end on cylinder boundary.
> /dev/sda2  26   14593   117013441   8e  Linux LVM
> /dev/sda3   14594   38913   195350400   83  Linux
>

First off, do and fdisk -l /dev/sda
The physical info on /dev/sda wasn't included.

Takes the Heads * Sectors * Cylinders / 2 to get true size.
Many manufactures use GB to be 1,000,000,000 bytes instead of a true GB.
The machine I am using at the moment gives these numbers.
255 Heads * 63 Sectors * 19452 cylinders = 312496380 total sectors
Divide by 2 to get 1K units, and it is 156248190KB
Divide by 1024 to get 1M units, and it is 152586.12MB
Divide by 1024 to get 1G units, and it is 149.01GB.
But the Drive is called a 160GB disk?
Disk /dev/sda: 160.0 GB, 1600 bytes

Thus there is a difference of about 11GB of size.

If you did a disk image from a drive with different settings, you might
need to use a partitioning tool to reset the options. I've used Parted
Magic in the past.







-- 
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines


Firewall setting needed for NFS?

2010-02-27 Thread Michael D. Setzer II
I'm trying to figure out the firewall options for NFS setup.
If I completely disable the firewall, it works fine. 
I've found a number of pages that say what ports  need to be opened, but it 
continues to fail even with  all those ports open.

I don't have a need for the NFS, but I've had a number of users of my G4L 
disk imaging program that want to use NFS in addition to the SSHFS and 
CIFS that it already supports.  It can also image to local partitions or ftp 
servers.

I even used wireshark to monitor the transactions to see what ports were 
used for a connection with the firewall disabled, but it didn't work when I 
opened those ports.


+--------------+
  Michael D. Setzer II -  Computer Science Instructor  
  Guam Community College  Computer Center  
  mailto:mi...@kuentos.guam.net
  mailto:msetze...@gmail.com
  http://www.guam.net/home/mikes
  Guam - Where America's Day Begins
+--+

http://setiathome.berkeley.edu (Original)
Number of Seti Units Returned:  19,471
Processing time:  32 years, 290 days, 12 hours, 58 minutes
(Total Hours: 287,489)

bo...@home CREDITS
SETI  9,422,644.387946 | EINSTEIN  3,793,321.460851
ROSETTA   1,721,675.117960 | ABC 181,634.244915

-- 
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines


Re: Which backup program should one use? Was Re: Risks of backing up live mounted filesystems using dump(8)

2010-03-01 Thread Michael D. Setzer II


On 1 Mar 2010 at 16:48, Rick Sewill wrote:

Subject:Which backup program should one use?  Was Re: Risks 
of backing up
live mounted filesystems using dump(8)
From:   Rick Sewill 
To: Community support for Fedora users 

Date sent:  Mon, 01 Mar 2010 16:48:53 -0600
Send reply to:  Community support for Fedora users 

<mailto:users-
requ...@lists.fedoraproject.org?subject=unsubscribe>
<mailto:users-
requ...@lists.fedoraproject.org?subject=subscribe>

> On Mon, 2010-03-01 at 10:29 -0800, Jeffrey Metcalf wrote: 
> > Hi,
> > 
> > I'm hoping I can start a brief thread discussing the potential risks 
> > involved with backing up live mounted (RW) ext2/3/4 filesystems using 
> > dump(8).  Here are the reasons I ask this:
> > 
> > 1.  My understanding is that it is safest to dump unmounted filesystems to 
> > ensure all buffers are flushed and all files on the device are consistent 
> > and up-to-date.  However...
> > 2.  Performing filesystem dumps can be a time consuming process and 
> > therefore taking the extra time to boot to level 1 and mount / RO to access 
> > utilities just adds additional work.  Booting to read-only media with 
> > utilities is just as time consuming.
> > 3.  If / is mounted RO, it is not possible to write records to 
> > /etc/dumpdates as would occur with /sbin/dump -u.  Obviously one can mount 
> > / RW to dump other filesystems, but it still seems awkward and time 
> > consuming to have to drop to level 1 anyway, which may be necessary to 
> > unmount and dump /home say.
> > 4.  Obviously dropping the runlevel to 1 or booting to RO media such as 
> > Fedora Live also prevents anyone other than root from using the system.
> > 
> > Clearly dumping backups of live mounted RW filesystems will not guarantee 
> > that file data written between dump passes are completely consistent, but I 
> > am looking to better understand the risks.  Clearly databases on 
> > filesystems being dumped should be closed and unmounted due to the extra 
> > software-level buffering that many databases perform, but if the mounted 
> > filesystems are generally idle, are there any gotchas one can expect when 
> > restoring such backups.  Also, my filesystems are all ext4 on Fedora Core 
> > 12.  Any additional protection that the journaling and journal checksum 
> > features can provide in this regard?
> > 
> > Cheers,
> > 
> > -J
> > 
> > 
> > 
> >   
> 
> This question brings up a question that has been bothering me.
> 
> Hopefully, leaving this question on the same thread, but changing 
> the subject line, is the appropriate method to ask my question.
> 
> I've been confused what backup program, dump or tar, to use.
> 
> At first, I was using dump to back up my partitions.
> 
> I switched to using tar after reading 
> http://www.redhat.com/docs/manuals/linux/RHL-9-Manual/admin-primer/s1-disaster-rhlspec.html
> 
> but then I read the following
> http://dump.sourceforge.net/isdumpdeprecated.html
> 
> and now I don't know what to think.
> 
> I'd like to know what backup program, dump or tar, people use and why.
> 
> Please give reasons for your choices.  Please no flame wars.
> If my question starts a flame war, I would ask the moderators 
> to please close/delete the part of the thread I started.
> 
> I feel, which program I use for the backup program,
> doesn't matter if it gets the job done.
> 
> I am interested in hearing the advantages/disadvantages/pitfalls
> of dump vs tar.
> 
> I'd like to decide whether to stay with tar or go back to dump
> after seeing a reasonable discussion on this matter.
> 
> If leaving my question on the same thread, but changing the subject
> is wrong, please do what is appropriate to follow forum conventions.
> 
> 

First, I'm the current maintainer for the free g4l project that does disk 
images, and it is basically a front end that backs up mainly using dd with 
various options of compression and using ftp, cifs, sshfs, and recently nfs 
support. It can backup disk or partitions, but doesn't not do resizing directly.

I have built it using my Fedora systems over the years, and it can be added 
as an option to grub, which makes it easy to run. 

There are also other programs link g4u that do similar things.

Linux.com had a link recently on this.
6 of the Best Free Linux Disk Cloning Software
http://www.linuxlinks.com/article/20100220020013726/DiskCloning.html

The program is on sourceforge, but an even later version with SMP and nfs 
support recently added with newer kernels is at:

ftp:/

Re: How to remove linux partition

2010-03-27 Thread Michael D. Setzer II
On 27 Mar 2010 at 19:47, RAMAKISHOREBABU KOPPULA wrote:

Date sent:  Sat, 27 Mar 2010 19:47:29 +0530
Subject:How to remove linux partition
From:   RAMAKISHOREBABU KOPPULA 
To: users@lists.fedoraproject.org
Send reply to:  Community support for Fedora users 

<mailto:users-requ...@lists.fedoraproject.org?subject=unsubscribe>
<mailto:users-requ...@lists.fedoraproject.org?subject=subscribe>

> 
> I have installed Windows XP in one partition and then I have installed 
> Fedora11 in another 
> partition. Now I need to remove Linux partition and add that disk space to 
> windows partition. How 
> to do this?
> 
> Please help me out.
> 

You need to   provide more information on your configuration?
1. Is the boot loader the windows ntldr or is the system using grub?
2. What is the partition layout? Is the XP on the first partitoin or which? 
With 
Fedora, you should have a boot and a root partition. 

I just help a student go in the other direction. He had installed linux on his 
system, but has moved to using more linux, so wanted to reduce the size of 
windows and increase the size of linux. Used a Live CD with gparted to 
resize the partitions. I like the parted majgic CD. 

If the boot process is grub, you will need to reinstall a XP MBR of be forced 
to leave the boot partition, and change the default to Windows.

So, more info is needed. 




> Thank you.
> 
> Kishore


+--------------+
  Michael D. Setzer II -  Computer Science Instructor  
  Guam Community College  Computer Center  
  mailto:mi...@kuentos.guam.net
  mailto:msetze...@gmail.com
  http://www.guam.net/home/mikes
  Guam - Where America's Day Begins
+--+

http://setiathome.berkeley.edu (Original)
Number of Seti Units Returned:  19,471
Processing time:  32 years, 290 days, 12 hours, 58 minutes
(Total Hours: 287,489)

bo...@home CREDITS
SETI  9,535,143.929810 | EINSTEIN  3,864,659.270851
ROSETTA   1,813,326.197366 | ABC 416,151.919783

-- 
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines


Re: How to remove linux partition

2010-03-27 Thread Michael D. Setzer II


On 27 Mar 2010 at 9:47, Craig White wrote:

Subject:Re: How to remove linux partition
From:   Craig White 
To: Community support for Fedora users 

Date sent:  Sat, 27 Mar 2010 09:47:03 -0700
Send reply to:  Community support for Fedora users 

<mailto:users-
requ...@lists.fedoraproject.org?subject=unsubscribe>
<mailto:users-
requ...@lists.fedoraproject.org?subject=subscribe>

> On Sun, 2010-03-28 at 00:27 +0800, Ed Greshko wrote:
> > I've not had to mess with Windows partitions much...but I don't recall
> > the Linux tools being much good at fiddling with NTFS.
> > 
> > It would be my suggestion to get a copy of "Partition Magic".  Its a
> > good Windows utility that can be had for a "good price" if you know
> > where to look. 
> 
> you should probably remove Partition Magic from your recommended list of
> utilities since it is essentially:
> 
> - abandoned software 
>   http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/PartitionMagic
> 
> - incapable of dealing with ext4
> 

I believe the original message said it was Fedora 11, which I believe didn't 
use ext4 or have it as an option.

> actually, the system tools in Linux are pretty good at dealing with NTFS
> these days. In reality, you can just 'format' a partition in Windows to
> repurpose it from Linux to Windows or use either the Windows or Linux
> versions of fdisk to remove Linux partitions.
> 

I've used the gparted with a number of live cds, and the ntfsprog do a very 
good job supporting ntfs. 

My G4L project has ntfsclone and supports ntfs, but no director resizing.

> Craig
> 
> 
> -- 
> This message has been scanned for viruses and
> dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
> believed to be clean.
> 
> -- 
> users mailing list
> users@lists.fedoraproject.org
> To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
> https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
> Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines


+--+
  Michael D. Setzer II -  Computer Science Instructor  
  Guam Community College  Computer Center  
  mailto:mi...@kuentos.guam.net
  mailto:msetze...@gmail.com
  http://www.guam.net/home/mikes
  Guam - Where America's Day Begins
+--+

http://setiathome.berkeley.edu (Original)
Number of Seti Units Returned:  19,471
Processing time:  32 years, 290 days, 12 hours, 58 minutes
(Total Hours: 287,489)

bo...@home CREDITS
SETI  9,535,143.929810 | EINSTEIN  3,864,659.270851
ROSETTA   1,813,326.197366 | ABC 416,151.919783

-- 
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines


Re: How to remove linux partition

2010-03-27 Thread Michael D. Setzer II
On 27 Mar 2010 at 19:47, RAMAKISHOREBABU KOPPULA wrote:

Date sent:  Sat, 27 Mar 2010 19:47:29 +0530
Subject:How to remove linux partition
From:   RAMAKISHOREBABU KOPPULA 
To: users@lists.fedoraproject.org
Send reply to:  Community support for Fedora users 

<mailto:users-requ...@lists.fedoraproject.org?subject=unsubscribe>
<mailto:users-requ...@lists.fedoraproject.org?subject=subscribe>

> 
> I have installed Windows XP in one partition and then I have installed 
> Fedora11 in another 
> partition. Now I need to remove Linux partition and add that disk space to 
> windows partition. How 
> to do this?
> 
> Please help me out.
> 

You need to   provide more information on your configuration?
1. Is the boot loader the windows ntldr or is the system using grub?
2. What is the partition layout? Is the XP on the first partitoin or which? 
With 
Fedora, you should have a boot and a root partition. 

I just help a student go in the other direction. He had installed linux on his 
system, but has moved to using more linux, so wanted to reduce the size of 
windows and increase the size of linux. Used a Live CD with gparted to 
resize the partitions. I like the parted majgic CD. 

If the boot process is grub, you will need to reinstall a XP MBR of be forced 
to leave the boot partition, and change the default to Windows.

So, more info is needed. 




> Thank you.
> 
> Kishore


+--------------+
  Michael D. Setzer II -  Computer Science Instructor  
  Guam Community College  Computer Center  
  mailto:mi...@kuentos.guam.net
  mailto:msetze...@gmail.com
  http://www.guam.net/home/mikes
  Guam - Where America's Day Begins
+--+

http://setiathome.berkeley.edu (Original)
Number of Seti Units Returned:  19,471
Processing time:  32 years, 290 days, 12 hours, 58 minutes
(Total Hours: 287,489)

bo...@home CREDITS
SETI  9,535,143.929810 | EINSTEIN  3,864,659.270851
ROSETTA   1,813,326.197366 | ABC 416,151.919783

-- 
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines


Re: Need help with clamav-0.96

2010-04-12 Thread Michael D. Setzer II
How did you install the clamav?
I just downloaded the source on a Fedora 6 machine.
./configure
make
make install

Since it installs in another location from the Fedora install, I had to remove 
the older versions (or replace them with a link to the new location). 

I didn't see the file not found message when I scanned the files in the test 
subdirectory?


On 11 Apr 2010 at 22:55, Steven W. Orr wrote:

Date sent:  Sun, 11 Apr 2010 22:55:56 -0400
From:   "Steven W. Orr" 
Organization:   SysLang
To: Fedora List 
Subject:Need help with clamav-0.96
Send reply to:  Community support for Fedora users 

<mailto:users-requ...@lists.fedoraproject.org?subject=unsubscribe>
<mailto:users-requ...@lists.fedoraproject.org?subject=subscribe>

> I'm running F10 so I can't expect much help, but the 0.94 version of clamav is
> about to go defunct. I successfully built 0.96 but now when I start it up I
> get this message:
> 
> [r...@saturn test]# clamscan --debug clam-v*.rar sendme
> LibClamAV debug: searching for unrar, user-searchpath: /usr/lib
> LibClamAV debug: searching for unrar: libclamunrar_iface.so.6.1.2 not found
> LibClamAV debug: searching for unrar: libclamunrar_iface.so.6 not found
> LibClamAV debug: searching for unrar: libclamunrar_iface.so not found
> LibClamAV debug: searching for unrar: libclamunrar_iface.a not found
> LibClamAV Warning: Cannot dlopen libclamunrar_iface: file not found - unrar
> support unavailable
> 
> The funny thinng is that
> 
> *582 > ls -l /usr/lib/libclamunrar_iface.so*
> lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 27 Apr 10 23:16 /usr/lib/libclamunrar_iface.so ->
> libclamunrar_iface.so.6.1.2
> lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 27 Apr 10 23:16 /usr/lib/libclamunrar_iface.so.6 ->
> libclamunrar_iface.so.6.1.2
> -rwxr-xr-x 1 root root 8024 Apr  9 22:18 /usr/lib/libclamunrar_iface.so.6.1.2
> 
> So, basically, I have no idea where to proceed. If anyone has a suggestion,
> I'd be grateful.
> 
> TIA
> 
> -- 
> Time flies like the wind. Fruit flies like a banana. Stranger things have  .0.
> happened but none stranger than this. Does your driver's license say Organ ..0
> Donor?Black holes are where God divided by zero. Listen to me! We are all- 000
> individuals! What if this weren't a hypothetical question?
> steveo at syslang.net
> 
> 


+--+
  Michael D. Setzer II -  Computer Science Instructor  
  Guam Community College  Computer Center  
  mailto:mi...@kuentos.guam.net
  mailto:msetze...@gmail.com
  http://www.guam.net/home/mikes
  Guam - Where America's Day Begins
+--+

http://setiathome.berkeley.edu (Original)
Number of Seti Units Returned:  19,471
Processing time:  32 years, 290 days, 12 hours, 58 minutes
(Total Hours: 287,489)

bo...@home CREDITS
SETI 9588799.540572   |   EINSTEIN 3913683.940851
ROSETTA  1859116.283805   |   ABC   630152.296177

-- 
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines


OT: Tool to work with bash script files

2010-05-02 Thread Michael D. Setzer II
I've been looking for a tool to help working on bash script.
I am the maintainer of the g4l project, and its primary script has been about 
3300 lines long. I've been going thru it, and using functions and other 
methods, I've gotten it down to about 2066 lines. 

I didn't write the original script, and have mostly just been adding new 
features and making modifications where necessary, but have just released a 
new version, so thought cleaning things up before other things come up.

Lots of programs to work with C programs.

Thanks.

+----------+
  Michael D. Setzer II -  Computer Science Instructor  
  Guam Community College  Computer Center  
  mailto:mi...@kuentos.guam.net
  mailto:msetze...@gmail.com
  http://www.guam.net/home/mikes
  Guam - Where America's Day Begins
+--+

http://setiathome.berkeley.edu (Original)
Number of Seti Units Returned:  19,471
Processing time:  32 years, 290 days, 12 hours, 58 minutes
(Total Hours: 287,489)

bo...@home CREDITS
SETI 9628412.959704   |   EINSTEIN 3959636.800851
ROSETTA  1894882.412180   |   ABC   790361.739164

-- 
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines


Re: OT: Tool to work with bash script files

2010-05-02 Thread Michael D. Setzer II
On 2 May 2010 at 13:34, Marcus D. Leech wrote:

Date sent:  Sun, 02 May 2010 13:34:54 -0400
From:   "Marcus D. Leech" 
To: users@lists.fedoraproject.org
Subject:Re: OT: Tool to work with bash script files
Send reply to:  Community support for Fedora users 

<mailto:users-
requ...@lists.fedoraproject.org?subject=unsubscribe>
<mailto:users-
requ...@lists.fedoraproject.org?subject=subscribe>

> On 05/02/2010 10:41 AM, Michael D. Setzer II wrote:
> > I've been looking for a tool to help working on bash script.
> > I am the maintainer of the g4l project, and its primary script has been 
> > about 
> > 3300 lines long. I've been going thru it, and using functions and other 
> > methods, I've gotten it down to about 2066 lines. 
> >
> > I didn't write the original script, and have mostly just been adding new 
> > features and making modifications where necessary, but have just released a 
> > new version, so thought cleaning things up before other things come up.
> >
> > Lots of programs to work with C programs.
> >
> > Thanks.
> >
> >   
> Geany has a coding template for bash scripts, if that's what you're after.
> 
> Apart from "smart editing", what is it that you're looking for?
> 

On occassions, I've made a change that breaks the script, and sometimes is 
finding a matching set of code with the loops, if, cases, etc.

In going from the latest released version of the script in 0.33 of g4l with 
3384 lines and 129593 bytes to 2057 lines and 85597 I have generated 
about 30 versions with minor changes in each to make sure that everything 
still works as before. Most of that is using functions to reduce duplicate 
code, 
and using variables to reduce some code length. 

Script makes use of dialog for most of the screen output.

Have used gedit for the editing so far, but am downloading geany to see if it 
provides more. Gedit has some features that make it nice to work with other 
languages.

Thanks.


> 
> -- 
> Marcus Leech
> Principal Investigator
> Shirleys Bay Radio Astronomy Consortium
> http://www.sbrac.org
> 
> 
> -- 
> users mailing list
> users@lists.fedoraproject.org
> To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
> https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
> Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines


+--+
  Michael D. Setzer II -  Computer Science Instructor  
  Guam Community College  Computer Center  
  mailto:mi...@kuentos.guam.net
  mailto:msetze...@gmail.com
  http://www.guam.net/home/mikes
  Guam - Where America's Day Begins
+--+

http://setiathome.berkeley.edu (Original)
Number of Seti Units Returned:  19,471
Processing time:  32 years, 290 days, 12 hours, 58 minutes
(Total Hours: 287,489)

bo...@home CREDITS
SETI 9628412.959704   |   EINSTEIN 3959636.800851
ROSETTA  1894882.412180   |   ABC   790361.739164

-- 
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines


Re: vnc and gnome3

2011-06-02 Thread Michael D. Setzer II



I upgraded a Fedora 14 machine that had vncserver running on it, 
and it works most of the time. In my it is started by the vncserver 
service that uses the /etc/sysconfig/vncserver to start it up.


On the machine, you could try manually starting it.
vncserver :10
vncviewer 127.0.0.1:10


I have had one issue, where the pid files are still existing after a 
power outage on the machine, and have to manually remove 
them and restart.


As a side note. Doesn't vino only work with the :0 display.




On 2 Jun 2011 at 10:30, Eric Tanguy wrote:


Date sent:     Thu, 02 Jun 2011 10:30:03 +0200
From:    Eric Tanguy 
To: Community support for Fedora users 

Subject:     vnc and gnome3
Send reply to:   Community support for Fedora users 

   
   


> I tried to enable vnc viewing of my gnome3 session. I enabled the 
> options in vino-preferences with the network autoconfiguration option 
> but when i try to connect with a vnc client from my winxp laptop it does 
> not work.
> Any idea ?
> Thanks
> Eric
> 
> -- 
> users mailing list
> users@lists.fedoraproject.org
> To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
> https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
> Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines


  


-- 
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines


Re: AMD Phenom(tm) II X4 955 Processor runs only between 800-2700 Mhz

2011-06-02 Thread Michael D. Setzer II
On 2 Jun 2011 at 11:44, Jörn Rink wrote:

Date sent:  Thu, 2 Jun 2011 11:44:04 +0200
From:   Jörn Rink 
To: fedora-l...@redhat.com
Subject:Re: AMD Phenom(tm) II X4 955 Processor runs 
only between 800-2700 Mhz
Send reply to:  Community support for Fedora users 

<mailto:users-
requ...@lists.fedoraproject.org?subject=unsubscribe>
<mailto:users-
requ...@lists.fedoraproject.org?subject=subscribe>

> Am Wed, 01 Jun 2011 15:03:26 +1000
> hat "Michael D. Setzer II"  (Michael D. Setzer
> II) folgendes geschrieben:
> 
> > On 1 Jun 2011 at 6:35, Jörn Rink wrote:
> > 
> > Date sent:  Wed, 1 Jun 2011 06:35:42 +0200
> > From:   Jörn Rink 
> > To: fedora-l...@redhat.com
> > Subject:AMD Phenom(tm) II X4 955 Processor runs only 
> > between 800-2700 Mhz
> > Send reply to:  Community support for Fedora users 
> > 
> > <mailto:users-
> > requ...@lists.fedoraproject.org?subject=unsubscribe>
> > <mailto:users-
> > requ...@lists.fedoraproject.org?subject=subscribe>
> > 
> 
> Hi,
> 
> cat 
> cat /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu0/cpufreq/bios_limit

I have upto cpufreq, but it is empty on my system
cat /proc/cpuinfo returns this.

processor   : 0
vendor_id   : AuthenticAMD
cpu family  : 16
model   : 4
model name  : AMD Phenom(tm) II X4 955 Processor
stepping: 2
cpu MHz : 3211.199
cache size  : 512 KB
physical id : 0
siblings: 4
core id : 0
cpu cores   : 4
apicid  : 0
initial apicid  : 0
fpu : yes
fpu_exception   : yes
cpuid level : 5
wp  : yes
flags   : fpu vme de pse tsc msr pae mce cx8 apic sep mtrr pge mca cmov 
pat pse36 clflush mmx fxsr sse sse2 ht syscall nx mmxext fxsr_opt pdpe1gb 
rdtscp lm 3dnowext 3dnow constant_tsc rep_good nonstop_tsc extd_apicid pni 
monitor cx16 popcnt lahf_lm cmp_legacy svm extapic cr8_legacy abm sse4a misalig
nsse 3dnowprefetch osvw ibs skinit wdt arat npt lbrv svm_lock nrip_save
bogomips: 6422.39
TLB size: 1024 4K pages
clflush size: 64
cache_alignment : 64
address sizes   : 48 bits physical, 48 bits virtual
power management: ts ttp tm stc 100mhzsteps hwpstate

processor   : 1
vendor_id   : AuthenticAMD
cpu family  : 16
model   : 4
model name  : AMD Phenom(tm) II X4 955 Processor
stepping: 2
cpu MHz : 3211.199
cache size  : 512 KB
physical id : 0
siblings: 4
core id : 1
cpu cores   : 4
apicid  : 1
initial apicid  : 1
fpu : yes
fpu_exception   : yes
cpuid level : 5
wp  : yes
flags   : fpu vme de pse tsc msr pae mce cx8 apic sep mtrr pge mca cmov 
pat pse36 clflush mmx fxsr sse sse2 ht syscall nx mmxext fxsr_opt pdpe1gb 
rdtscp lm 3dnowext 3dnow constant_tsc rep_good nonstop_tsc extd_apicid pni 
monitor cx16 popcnt lahf_lm cmp_legacy svm extapic cr8_legacy abm sse4a misalig
nsse 3dnowprefetch osvw ibs skinit wdt arat npt lbrv svm_lock nrip_save
bogomips: 6421.91
TLB size: 1024 4K pages
clflush size: 64
cache_alignment : 64
address sizes   : 48 bits physical, 48 bits virtual
power management: ts ttp tm stc 100mhzsteps hwpstate

processor   : 2
vendor_id   : AuthenticAMD
cpu family  : 16
model   : 4
model name  : AMD Phenom(tm) II X4 955 Processor
stepping: 2
cpu MHz : 3211.199
cache size  : 512 KB
physical id : 0
siblings: 4
core id : 2
cpu cores   : 4
apicid  : 2
initial apicid  : 2
fpu : yes
fpu_exception   : yes
cpuid level : 5
wp  : yes
flags   : fpu vme de pse tsc msr pae mce cx8 apic sep mtrr pge mca cmov 
pat pse36 clflush mmx fxsr sse sse2 ht syscall nx mmxext fxsr_opt pdpe1gb 
rdtscp lm 3dnowext 3dnow constant_tsc rep_good nonstop_tsc extd_apicid pni 
monitor cx16 popcnt lahf_lm cmp_legacy svm extapic cr8_legacy abm sse4a misalig
nsse 3dnowprefetch osvw ibs skinit wdt arat npt lbrv svm_lock nrip_save
bogomips: 6421.91
TLB size: 1024 4K pages
clflush size: 64
cache_alignment : 64
address sizes   : 48 bits physical, 48 bits virtual
power management: ts ttp tm stc 100mhzsteps hwpstate

processor   : 3
vendor_id   : AuthenticAMD
cpu family  : 16
model   : 4
model name  : AMD Phenom(tm) II X4 955 Processor
stepping: 2
cpu MHz : 3211.199
cache size  : 512 KB
physical id : 0
siblings: 4
core id : 3
cpu cores   : 4
apicid  : 3
initial apicid  : 3
fpu : yes
fpu_exception   : yes
cpuid level : 5
wp  : yes
flags   : fpu vme de pse tsc msr pae mce cx8 apic sep mtrr pge mca cmov 
pat pse36 clflush mmx fxsr sse ss

Re: Partition does not end on cylinder boundary

2011-06-08 Thread Michael D. Setzer II
On 8 Jun 2011 at 7:22, Joe Zeff wrote:

Date sent:  Wed, 08 Jun 2011 07:22:36 -0700
From:   Joe Zeff 
To: Community support for Fedora users 

Subject:Re: Partition does not end on cylinder boundary
Send reply to:  Community support for Fedora users 

<mailto:users-
requ...@lists.fedoraproject.org?subject=unsubscribe>
<mailto:users-
requ...@lists.fedoraproject.org?subject=subscribe>

> On 06/08/2011 05:56 AM, Tom Horsley wrote:
> > Though they were donuts pinned to cards rather than cards
> > pinned to donuts :-)
> 
> Unless my memory's faded, they had several different wires threaded to 
> them which held them in place in a big square array.  No pins, no card. 
>   At least that was true (IIRC) on the IBM 1620 I worked on when I was 
> first learning programming.

Back in the mid 70's I worked on a 1963 IBM 1130 in my high 
school in Guam, and it had core memory, and you could see the 
memory (all 4K of it), and had a little modual that you could plug in 
another section to actually read the memory. But that was like 35 
years ago, so I may be thinking of somethinge else. Punched 
cards and 5M removable disks, no crt, teletype printer. 


> -- 
> users mailing list
> users@lists.fedoraproject.org
> To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
> https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
> Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines


+----------+
  Michael D. Setzer II -  Computer Science Instructor  
  Guam Community College  Computer Center  
  mailto:mi...@kuentos.guam.net
  mailto:msetze...@gmail.com
  http://www.guam.net/home/mikes
  Guam - Where America's Day Begins
  G4L Disk Imaging Project maintainer 
  http://sourceforge.net/projects/g4l/
+--+

http://setiathome.berkeley.edu (Original)
Number of Seti Units Returned:  19,471
Processing time:  32 years, 290 days, 12 hours, 58 minutes
(Total Hours: 287,489)

BOINC@HOME CREDITS
SETI10854179.421156   |   EINSTEIN 5995732.120851
ROSETTA  3228770.538737   |   ABC  6219550.373227

-- 
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines


Re: Special Characters

2011-06-15 Thread Michael D. Setzer II
On 15 Jun 2011 at 22:52, Petrus de Calguarium wrote:

To: users@lists.fedoraproject.org
From:   Petrus de Calguarium 
Subject:Re: Special Characters
Date sent:  Wed, 15 Jun 2011 22:52:05 -0600
Send reply to:  Community support for Fedora users 

<mailto:users-
requ...@lists.fedoraproject.org?subject=unsubscribe>
<mailto:users-
requ...@lists.fedoraproject.org?subject=subscribe>

> Tim wrote:
> 
> > Ever more, the need for the standard QWERTY keyboard (and its ilk) to be
> > abandoned has increased.  It's inadequate for anything more than primary
> > school beginner's English.
> 
> I've always wanted a keyboard that has the letters arranged in order. It 
> makes no sense for me, and likely 95% of other computer users, to have querty 
> or other unnatural key arrangements. I realize that they are based on 
> character frequency in English, which serve only stenographers who:
> 
Dvoark keyboard was designed for most keys used.
The QWERTY was designed to not jam as much with the old 
mechanical typewriters. 

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dvorak_Simplified_Keyboard



> type with all 10 fingers, instead of picking with 2-3 fingers, like most 
> people do; and
> 
> write in only one language
> 
> Your suggestion of having extra keys for diactical and punctuation marks and 
> symbols is definitely a good one. It would be difficult to standardize all of 
> this to accommodate all languages, but to standardize it for all languages 
> that use the Roman alphabet and Arabic numerals, like most European languages 
> do, should not be that difficult. I wish manufacturers would put some thought 
> into this.
> 
> -- 
> users mailing list
> users@lists.fedoraproject.org
> To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
> https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
> Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines


+--+
  Michael D. Setzer II -  Computer Science Instructor  
  Guam Community College  Computer Center  
  mailto:mi...@kuentos.guam.net
  mailto:msetze...@gmail.com
  http://www.guam.net/home/mikes
  Guam - Where America's Day Begins
  G4L Disk Imaging Project maintainer 
  http://sourceforge.net/projects/g4l/
+--+

http://setiathome.berkeley.edu (Original)
Number of Seti Units Returned:  19,471
Processing time:  32 years, 290 days, 12 hours, 58 minutes
(Total Hours: 287,489)

BOINC@HOME CREDITS
SETI10885800.113634   |   EINSTEIN 6027290.210851
ROSETTA  3252689.139248   |   ABC  6355184.399625

-- 
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines


problem wth sort utility?

2011-07-01 Thread Michael D. Setzer II
I'm getting results that I don't expect and different from busybox 
sort?

The file contains partition infomation
[==DISK==] [=NAME==] 
[SIZE] [MAJ] [MIN]
[sda ] [Hitachi HDP72505   ] [   465.76 GB] [  8] [  
0]

[=DEVICE=] [==FILESYS==] [==LABEL==] 
[SIZE] [MAJ] [MIN] 
[sda1] [ext3   ] [] [   200.00 MB] [  8] [  
1] 
[sda2] [LVM2_member] [] [31.18 GB] [  
8] [  2] 
[sda3] [ext3   ] [] [   434.38 GB] [  8] [  3] 
[dm-0] [ext4   ] [] [25.87 GB] [253] [  
0] 
[dm-1] [swap   ] [] [ 5.31 GB] [253] [  
1] 

When I use the Fedora 14 sort I get this.

[=DEVICE=] [==FILESYS==] [==LABEL==] 
[SIZE] [MAJ] [MIN] 
[==DISK==] [=NAME==] 
[SIZE] [MAJ] [MIN]
[dm-0] [ext4   ] [] [25.87 GB] [253] [  
0] 
[dm-1] [swap   ] [] [ 5.31 GB] [253] [  
1] 
[sda1] [ext3   ] [] [   200.00 MB] [  8] [  
1] 
[sda2] [LVM2_member] [] [31.18 GB] [  
8] [  2] 
[sda3] [ext3   ] [] [   434.38 GB] [  8] [  3] 
[sda ] [Hitachi HDP72505   ] [   465.76 GB] [  8] [  
0]

Which is not what I expect with sda coming at the end instead of 
before sda1, and there are just spaces between all the charcters, 
no special codes.

Using busybox sort results in this.

[==DISK==] [=NAME==] 
[SIZE] [MAJ] [MIN]
[=DEVICE=] [==FILESYS==] [==LABEL==] 
[SIZE] [MAJ] [MIN] 
[dm-0] [ext4   ] [] [25.87 GB] [253] [  
0] 
[dm-1] [swap   ] [] [ 5.31 GB] [253] [  
1] 
[sda ] [Hitachi HDP72505   ] [   465.76 GB] [  8] [  
0]
[sda1] [ext3   ] [] [   200.00 MB] [  8] [  
1] 
[sda2] [LVM2_member] [] [31.18 GB] [  
8] [  2] 
[sda3] [ext3   ] [] [   434.38 GB] [  8] [  3] 

Which is what I expect?
If I create a file with just the disk and partition info, both sorts give 
me the correct sorts. Even if I put spaces afterwards it sorts fine, 
but if I put non-blanks it puts the sda at the end?

Any ideals on why sort is acting this way?


+--+
  Michael D. Setzer II -  Computer Science Instructor  
  Guam Community College  Computer Center  
  mailto:mi...@kuentos.guam.net
  mailto:msetze...@gmail.com
  http://www.guam.net/home/mikes
  Guam - Where America's Day Begins
  G4L Disk Imaging Project maintainer 
  http://sourceforge.net/projects/g4l/
+--+

http://setiathome.berkeley.edu (Original)
Number of Seti Units Returned:  19,471
Processing time:  32 years, 290 days, 12 hours, 58 minutes
(Total Hours: 287,489)

BOINC@HOME CREDITS
SETI10944149.476033   |   EINSTEIN 6108721.330851
ROSETTA  3318509.748210   |   ABC  6642219.200443

-- 
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines


Re: problem wth sort utility?

2011-07-01 Thread Michael D. Setzer II
On 1 Jul 2011 at 11:50, Roberto Ragusa wrote:

Date sent:  Fri, 01 Jul 2011 11:50:39 +0200
From:   Roberto Ragusa 
To: Community support for Fedora users 

Subject:Re: problem wth sort utility?
Send reply to:  Community support for Fedora users 

<mailto:users-
requ...@lists.fedoraproject.org?subject=unsubscribe>
<mailto:users-
requ...@lists.fedoraproject.org?subject=subscribe>

> On 07/01/2011 09:00 AM, Michael D. Setzer II wrote:
> > I'm getting results that I don't expect and different from busybox 
> > sort?
> 
> The busybox sorting is more simple (and more correct, to your eyes).
> 
> Try with:
> 
> LC_COLLATE=C sort a >b
> 
> or
> 
> LC_ALL=C sort a >b
> 
> to disable the linguistic "smart" sorting which tries to address
> capital letters, spaces, accented letters and so on in ways which
> are sometimes welcome and other times surprising.
> 
> If you want the raw sorting (as by C language's strcmp()) you have
> to use the LC_COLLATE=C or LC_ALL=C env var.

Thanks. I looked thru the man sort, but didn't find a switch that I 
would expect to change this.

The command I use that no works is
fsarchiver probe 2>&1 | LC_ALL=C sort 

What makes this not the default? 

I do other filtering to extract subsets and reformat data so it works 
with a dialog radio button screen to select the info.





> 
> -- 
>Roberto Ragusamail at robertoragusa.it
> -- 
> users mailing list
> users@lists.fedoraproject.org
> To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
> https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
> Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines


+--+
  Michael D. Setzer II -  Computer Science Instructor  
  Guam Community College  Computer Center  
  mailto:mi...@kuentos.guam.net
  mailto:msetze...@gmail.com
  http://www.guam.net/home/mikes
  Guam - Where America's Day Begins
  G4L Disk Imaging Project maintainer 
  http://sourceforge.net/projects/g4l/
+--+

http://setiathome.berkeley.edu (Original)
Number of Seti Units Returned:  19,471
Processing time:  32 years, 290 days, 12 hours, 58 minutes
(Total Hours: 287,489)

BOINC@HOME CREDITS
SETI10944149.476033   |   EINSTEIN 6108721.330851
ROSETTA  3318509.748210   |   ABC  6642219.200443

-- 
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines


New Boinc 6.12.33 doesn't work with Fedora?

2011-07-05 Thread Michael D. Setzer II
There is a new version of Boinc 6.12.33, but neither the client or 
manager seems to work with Fedora.

The previous 6.12.28 client would work, but the manager failed. 
The new client thou does work with the older manager.

The issue seems to be libraries.

I backed up the Boinc directory before doing the upgrade, so it 
was easy to restore it.


+--+
  Michael D. Setzer II -  Computer Science Instructor  
  Guam Community College  Computer Center  
  mailto:mi...@kuentos.guam.net
  mailto:msetze...@gmail.com
  http://www.guam.net/home/mikes
  Guam - Where America's Day Begins
  G4L Disk Imaging Project maintainer 
  http://sourceforge.net/projects/g4l/
+--+

http://setiathome.berkeley.edu (Original)
Number of Seti Units Returned:  19,471
Processing time:  32 years, 290 days, 12 hours, 58 minutes
(Total Hours: 287,489)

BOINC@HOME CREDITS
SETI10960335.205421   |   EINSTEIN 6132533.840851
ROSETTA  3338543.509952   |   ABC  6723585.226992

-- 
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines


Re: Overwriting a 4096 byte sector harddisk drive with random data

2011-07-21 Thread Michael D. Setzer II
On 21 Jul 2011 at 20:15, yudi v wrote:

Date sent:  Thu, 21 Jul 2011 20:15:39 +1000
Subject:Re: Overwriting a 4096 byte sector harddisk drive with random 
data
From:   yudi v 
To: Community support for Fedora users 
Send reply to:  Community support for Fedora users 

<mailto:users-requ...@lists.fedoraproject.org?subject=unsubscribe>
<mailto:users-requ...@lists.fedoraproject.org?subject=subscribe>

> 
> 
> 
> On Thu, Jul 21, 2011 at 8:04 PM, Gilboa Davara  wrote:
> On Thu, 2011-07-21 at 19:48 +1000, yudi v wrote:
> > Hi
> > From what I understand, the first command above will write data in
> > 512 byte blocks, the second one in 1MB blocks, and the third in 
> 4096
> > byte blocks. Right?
> 
> Yep.
> The 1M should also yield considerably better performance. 
> (Though the
> random number generator may cap the performance in this 
> case).
> 
> - Gilboa
> 
> -
> 
> Sorry, could you please elaborate a bit more on how a higher size block 
> results in better 
> performance.

I maintain a disk imaging project, and bs can make a big 
difference depending on the disk and hardware being used. Here 
is a quick set of test I just did creating a 10MB file from urandom 
on my system. You may get higher or lower results depending on 
your hardware and the size of the file or disk.

time  dd if=/dev/urandom of=test1 bs=1M count=10
10+0 records in
10+0 records out
10485760 bytes (10 MB) copied, 1.23827 s, 8.5 MB/s

real0m1.241s
user0m0.000s
sys 0m1.222s

time  dd if=/dev/urandom of=test1 bs=4096 count=2560
2560+0 records in
2560+0 records out
10485760 bytes (10 MB) copied, 1.26018 s, 8.3 MB/s

real0m1.264s
user0m0.001s
sys 0m1.241s

time  dd if=/dev/urandom of=test1 bs=512 count=20480
20480+0 records in
20480+0 records out
10485760 bytes (10 MB) copied, 1.3672 s, 7.7 MB/s

real0m1.371s
user0m0.002s
sys 0m1.352s






> 
> -- 
> Kind regards,
> Yudi
> 


+--+
  Michael D. Setzer II -  Computer Science Instructor  
  Guam Community College  Computer Center  
  mailto:mi...@kuentos.guam.net
  mailto:msetze...@gmail.com
  http://www.guam.net/home/mikes
  Guam - Where America's Day Begins
  G4L Disk Imaging Project maintainer 
  http://sourceforge.net/projects/g4l/
+--+

http://setiathome.berkeley.edu (Original)
Number of Seti Units Returned:  19,471
Processing time:  32 years, 290 days, 12 hours, 58 minutes
(Total Hours: 287,489)

BOINC@HOME CREDITS
SETI11023792.670369   |   EINSTEIN 6216520.680851
ROSETTA  3399923.990913   |   ABC  6993668.719655

-- 
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines


Re: 2.6.40 kernel?

2011-08-02 Thread Michael D. Setzer II
On 3 Aug 2011 at 0:15, Ranjan Maitra wrote:

Date sent:  Wed, 3 Aug 2011 00:15:23 -0500
From:   Ranjan Maitra 
To: Community support for Fedora users 

Subject:2.6.40 kernel?
Organization:   Department of Statistics, Iowa State University
Send reply to:  Community support for Fedora users 

<mailto:users-
requ...@lists.fedoraproject.org?subject=unsubscribe>
<mailto:users-
requ...@lists.fedoraproject.org?subject=subscribe>

> Just wondering: the 2.6.40 kernel made it into F15 on Tuesday, What is
> this kernel about? There appears to be no 2.6.40 kernel on
> www.kernel.org.

>From what I understand, what would have been 2.6.40 was 
changed to 3.0, so don't know why fedora would use 2.6.40?



> 
> Ranjan
> -- 
> users mailing list
> users@lists.fedoraproject.org
> To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
> https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
> Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines


+--------------+
  Michael D. Setzer II -  Computer Science Instructor  
  Guam Community College  Computer Center  
  mailto:mi...@kuentos.guam.net
  mailto:msetze...@gmail.com
  http://www.guam.net/home/mikes
  Guam - Where America's Day Begins
  G4L Disk Imaging Project maintainer 
  http://sourceforge.net/projects/g4l/
+--+

http://setiathome.berkeley.edu (Original)
Number of Seti Units Returned:  19,471
Processing time:  32 years, 290 days, 12 hours, 58 minutes
(Total Hours: 287,489)

BOINC@HOME CREDITS
SETI11078054.074765   |   EINSTEIN 6295579.030851
ROSETTA  3443578.177926   |   ABC  7259084.277037

-- 
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines


Adding a Package to Fedora System?

2011-09-01 Thread Michael D. Setzer II
I've been the maintainer of the G4L project for about 6 or 7 years 
now, and I've been building it with my Fedora systems and using it 
on them to do disk and partition images. Normally, it is run from a 
cd, but one can simple copy the kernel file and ramdisk.lzma file 
to the boot  directory, and add a few lines to the grub.conf to 
make it a boot option into ram to make images or restore them. 

Was looking on getting info on what the process would be to do 
this. For me it is very useful, and I hope those that download it 
from sourceforge also find it so. 

Thanks.

+--+
  Michael D. Setzer II -  Computer Science Instructor  
  Guam Community College  Computer Center  
  mailto:mi...@kuentos.guam.net
  mailto:msetze...@gmail.com
  http://www.guam.net/home/mikes
  Guam - Where America's Day Begins
  G4L Disk Imaging Project maintainer 
  http://sourceforge.net/projects/g4l/
+--+

http://setiathome.berkeley.edu (Original)
Number of Seti Units Returned:  19,471
Processing time:  32 years, 290 days, 12 hours, 58 minutes
(Total Hours: 287,489)

BOINC@HOME CREDITS
SETI11188861.827016   |   EINSTEIN 6464865.409851
ROSETTA  3561096.658837   |   ABC  7821437.013274

-- 
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines


Question on DNS setup change not working.

2011-09-02 Thread Michael D. Setzer II
Our MIS department just decided to not allow the use of the public 
IP addresses of system from local machines, so I made the 
additions to the hosts file with the private ip and the name.
restart named and restarted squid, and squid picked up the 
change, and would bring up pages using the name. Unfortunately, 
dig and other options would still be using the public IP instead.

Tried restarting the machine to see if something might not have 
been changed, but it remains the same.

In the past, I had done this same thing for local services I have.
redhatgcc.dyndns.org has a public ip of 202.128.73.24, but on the 
inside it has the private ip of 192.168.50.41. So, the hosts file has 
the link between the 192.168.50.41 and the 
redhatgcc.dyndns.org,  and it reports that.

But now the college web sever that has a public IP of 
202.128.72.2 is now mapped internally to 10.10.10.11, so I added 
the same mapping but dig still reports the 202.128.72.2 number, 
and that will no longer work from the inside?

Is there something that might be caching the old information even 
after a system restart?  

At this point to get it to work, I've had to point to there DNS server 
that using 172.16.0.4? We've got less than 1000 machine on 
campus, but they now have 10.x.x.x networks, and 172.16.x 
networks and a number of 192.168.x networks...


+--+
  Michael D. Setzer II -  Computer Science Instructor  
  Guam Community College  Computer Center  
  mailto:mi...@kuentos.guam.net
  mailto:msetze...@gmail.com
  http://www.guam.net/home/mikes
  Guam - Where America's Day Begins
  G4L Disk Imaging Project maintainer 
  http://sourceforge.net/projects/g4l/
+--+

http://setiathome.berkeley.edu (Original)
Number of Seti Units Returned:  19,471
Processing time:  32 years, 290 days, 12 hours, 58 minutes
(Total Hours: 287,489)

BOINC@HOME CREDITS
SETI11189934.576302   |   EINSTEIN 6468781.769851
ROSETTA  3563786.501816   |   ABC  7853564.918328

-- 
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines


Re: Question on DNS setup change not working.

2011-09-02 Thread Michael D. Setzer II
On 3 Sep 2011 at 7:47, Cameron Simpson wrote:

Date sent:  Sat, 3 Sep 2011 07:47:02 +1000
From:   Cameron Simpson 
To: Community support for Fedora users 

Subject:Re: Question on DNS setup change not working.
Send reply to:  Community support for Fedora users 

<mailto:users-
requ...@lists.fedoraproject.org?subject=unsubscribe>
<mailto:users-
requ...@lists.fedoraproject.org?subject=subscribe>

> On 03Sep2011 04:56, Michael D. Setzer II  wrote:
> | Our MIS department just decided to not allow the use of the public 
> | IP addresses of system from local machines, so I made the 
> | additions to the hosts file with the private ip and the name.
> | restart named and restarted squid, and squid picked up the 
> | change, and would bring up pages using the name. Unfortunately, 
> | dig and other options would still be using the public IP instead.
> | 
> | Tried restarting the machine to see if something might not have 
> | been changed, but it remains the same.
> 
> /etc/hosts is not part of DNS. It is part of the name lookup procedure
> used by gethostbyname(). So: squid is affected by /etc/hosts, but dig
> and named are NOT, and will not be: they are specificly DNS tools.
> 
> My recommendation is to add a special .local zone to your named with
> names host1.local etc with the private addresses. Then add local to the
> _front_ of the search path in /etc/resolv.conf:
> 
>   search local your.normal.domain.here
> 
> Then using the short names should work.
> 

Thanks for the information. At the moment, the system is just 
running a caching nameserver, so will have to look at the process 
to setup the dns. I was under the impression that the resolv.conf 
with hosts bind was also for dns.

> Cheers,
> -- 
> Cameron Simpson  DoD#743
> http://www.cskk.ezoshosting.com/cs/
> 
> "He deserves death!"
> "Deserves it!  I daresay he does.  And many die that deserve life.  Is it in
>  your power to give it to them?  Then do not be so quick to deal out death in
>  judgement, for even the very wise may not see all ends."
> - Gandalf, _The Lord of the Rings_
> -- 
> users mailing list
> users@lists.fedoraproject.org
> To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
> https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
> Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines


+--+
  Michael D. Setzer II -  Computer Science Instructor  
  Guam Community College  Computer Center  
  mailto:mi...@kuentos.guam.net
  mailto:msetze...@gmail.com
  http://www.guam.net/home/mikes
  Guam - Where America's Day Begins
  G4L Disk Imaging Project maintainer 
  http://sourceforge.net/projects/g4l/
+--+

http://setiathome.berkeley.edu (Original)
Number of Seti Units Returned:  19,471
Processing time:  32 years, 290 days, 12 hours, 58 minutes
(Total Hours: 287,489)

BOINC@HOME CREDITS
SETI11189934.576302   |   EINSTEIN 6468781.769851
ROSETTA  3563786.501816   |   ABC  7853564.918328

-- 
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines


Re: Non-YouTube videos don't work in F15 [Solved]

2011-09-08 Thread Michael D. Setzer II
On 8 Sep 2011 at 18:51, Bob McClure Jr wrote:

Date sent:  Thu, 8 Sep 2011 18:51:52 -0500
From:   Bob McClure Jr 
To: Community support for Fedora users 

Subject:Re: Non-YouTube videos don't work in F15 
[Solved]
Send reply to:  Community support for Fedora users 


<mailto:users-requ...@lists.fedoraproject.org?subject=unsubscrib
e>

<mailto:users-requ...@lists.fedoraproject.org?subject=subscribe
>

> On Wed, Sep 07, 2011 at 06:24:25PM -0400, Sam Varshavchik wrote:
> > Bob McClure Jr writes:
> > 
> > >On Wed, Sep 07, 2011 at 01:38:21PM -0400, Sam Varshavchik wrote:
> > >> Bob McClure Jr writes:
> > >>
> > >> >Okay, did all that.  Used the rc1 tarball from Adobe.  Now I can't see
> > >> >the video portion of YouTube videos.  However I did notice something
> > >> >that may be a clue.  While the video (sound only) is playing, I
> > >> >clicked on the full-screen icon and a black screen came up with a
> > >> >window title bar that says "GTK-Gnash", never no mind that in
> > >> >Edit->Preferences->Applications I clicked on "Use Shockwave Flash".
> > >> >Could it be that FF is locked into using Gnash regardless of what I
> > >> >select?
> > >>
> > >> That's possible, so uninstall it.
> > >
> > >Okay, so done.  Now when it tries to play a YT video, I get Adobe's
> > >version of the BSOD that says "The Adobe Flash plugin has crashed."
> > >
> > >Here are another couple of data points.  If I bring up YT with
> > >Ephiphany, it plays them just fine.  AFAIK, the RC1 64-bit flash
> > >player is the only one on the system.
> > >
> > >If I try Konqueror, it reports I don't have a Flash plugin.
> > >
> > >Thanks for your patience.
> > 
> > Well, the long and the short of it is that the 64 bit plugin works
> > just fine for me.
> 
> After much screwing around with it, things are working now.  Based on
> my experience, here are the steps that worked.
> 
> - Download the 64-bit Flash player from Adobe.  I got the RC1
>   version.  Then do these as root:
> 
> cd /
> tar xzvf /flashplayer11_rc1_install_lin_64_090611.tar.gz
> chown root:root libflashplayer.so
> chmod 755 libflashplayer.so # didn't know it had to be executable earlier.
> mv libflashplayer.so /usr/lib64/mozilla/plugins/
> 
> - It was still failing because it was using gnash-plugin even though
>   I'd selected "Use Shockwave Flash" in Edit->Preferences->Applications
>   for "Shockwave Flash file", so I
> 
> yum remove gnash-plugin
> 
> Now I get audio and video for YouTube stuff as well as non-YT stuff,
> and as a bonus, I get my Live365 audio again.
> 
> I am a happy camper.  Oh, and the 32-bit stuff is still installed, so
> it will coexist with the 64-bit player.

Another alternative that might be an option with youtube.
Go to http://youtube.com/html5
then joing the html5 trial that will use WebM for displaying videos.

Doesn't solve the flash issue for everything, but it seems to get 
most videos to work without having to jump thru hoops..


> 
> Thanks for your patience and guidance.
> 
> Cheers,
> -- 
> Bob McClure, Jr. Bobcat Open Systems, Inc.
> b...@bobcatos.com http://www.bobcatos.com
> Know therefore that the LORD your God is God; he is the faithful God,
> keeping his covenant of love to a thousand generations of those who
> love him and keep his commands.  Deuteronomy 7:9 (NIV)
> -- 
> users mailing list
> users@lists.fedoraproject.org
> To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
> https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
> Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines


+--+
  Michael D. Setzer II -  Computer Science Instructor  
  Guam Community College  Computer Center  
  mailto:mi...@kuentos.guam.net
  mailto:msetze...@gmail.com
  http://www.guam.net/home/mikes
  Guam - Where America's Day Begins
  G4L Disk Imaging Project maintainer 
  http://sourceforge.net/projects/g4l/
+--+

http://setiathome.berkeley.edu (Original)
Number of Seti Units Returned:  19,471
Processing time:  32 years, 290 days, 12 hours, 58 minutes
(Total Hours: 287,489)

BOINC@HOME CREDITS
SETI11217422.706097   |   EINSTEIN 6510307.169851
ROSETTA  3592985.415703   |   ABC  7970217.804040

-- 
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines


Re: Quick and dirty partition table repair?

2011-09-11 Thread Michael D. Setzer II
On 11 Sep 2011 at 10:55, Tom Horsley wrote:

Date sent:  Sun, 11 Sep 2011 10:55:51 -0400
From:   Tom Horsley 
To: Fedora List 
Subject:Quick and dirty partition table repair?
Send reply to:  Community support for Fedora users 


<mailto:users-requ...@lists.fedoraproject.org?subject=unsubscrib
e>

<mailto:users-requ...@lists.fedoraproject.org?subject=subscribe
>

> I've been rearranging a disk with gparted and it left
> me with this:
> 
>Device Boot  Start End  Blocks   Id  System
> /dev/sdb42048   976773119   4883855365  Extended
> /dev/sdb54096512040952560   83  Linux
> /dev/sdb651206144   976771071   462782464   83  Linux

>From my understanding, an extended partition is not a partition 
that can be directly mounted. Rather it contains the other 
partitions that are within it. You can see that /dev/sdb5 and 
/dev/sdb6 are the logical partitions within the extended partition.

With basic partitions, you have the 4 physical partitions than can 
be the first one, but you can also make an extended partition that 
can the have logic partitions.

I'm not an expert on all parition options, but in being the 
maintainer of the g4l project have worked with a number of things. 

Hope that helps.


> 
> If I try to mount the partitions at boot time, something
> gets very confused by the extended partition being /dev/sdb4
> instead of /dev/sdb1.
> 
> Is there a quick way I can move the 4th primary partition entry
> to the 1st primary partition entry?
> 
> Or is a hex edit and extreme care my only hope?
> 
> Or maybe it would all be simpler if I just DDed the one partition
> I'm trying to keep to a file, reinitialize the disk from scratch,
> and then DD it back (making sure to make the partition the identical
> size).
> -- 
> users mailing list
> users@lists.fedoraproject.org
> To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
> https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
> Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines


+--+
  Michael D. Setzer II -  Computer Science Instructor  
  Guam Community College  Computer Center  
  mailto:mi...@kuentos.guam.net
  mailto:msetze...@gmail.com
  http://www.guam.net/home/mikes
  Guam - Where America's Day Begins
  G4L Disk Imaging Project maintainer 
  http://sourceforge.net/projects/g4l/
+--+

http://setiathome.berkeley.edu (Original)
Number of Seti Units Returned:  19,471
Processing time:  32 years, 290 days, 12 hours, 58 minutes
(Total Hours: 287,489)

BOINC@HOME CREDITS
SETI11219722.255013   |   EINSTEIN 6513470.039851
ROSETTA  3598070.767356   |   ABC  8010113.015091

-- 
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines


Re: Removing Windows from Dual Boot

2010-08-26 Thread Michael D. Setzer II
On 26 Aug 2010 at 13:31, Weiner, Michael wrote:

Subject:Removing Windows from Dual Boot
Date sent:  Thu, 26 Aug 2010 13:31:46 -0400
From:   "Weiner, Michael" 
To: "Community assistance, encouragement, and advice for using Fedora."

Send reply to:  Community support for Fedora users 

<mailto:users-requ...@lists.fedoraproject.org?subject=unsubscribe>
<mailto:users-requ...@lists.fedoraproject.org?subject=subscribe>

> 
> I am sure this has been asked a number of times, and I am not finding 
> anything relevant 
> using a google search, so I thought I would post my query here. I have a 
> user that owns 
> a Dell Inspiron laptop, that has a 60G drive split in two, with Windows 
> XP on the first 
> partition, and Fedora Core 7 on the second. Now, he decides he would like 
> me to 
> remove Windows XP and make it a 100% linux laptop. Great, I think to 
> myself, a convert! 
> Until I look at the way it is configured:
> 
> [r...@leex ~]# fdisk -l /dev/sda
> 
> Disk /dev/sda: 60.0 GB, 60011642880 bytes
> 255 heads, 63 sectors/track, 7296 cylinders
> Units = cylinders of 16065 * 512 = 8225280 bytes
> 
>  Device BootStartEnd Blocks IdSystem
> /dev/sda1*1 347027872743+ 7 HPFS/NTFS
> /dev/sda234713483 104422+ 83 Linux
> /dev/sda334847296 30627922+ 8e Linux LVM
> 
> [r...@leex ~]# df
> Filesystem1K-blocks Used Available Use% Mounted on
> /dev/mapper/VolGroup00-LogVol00
> 28599044 22148476 4974372 82% /
> /dev/sda2101105 1863177253 20% /boot
> tmpfs2574160 257416 0% /dev/shm
> 
> And from /boot/grub/grub.conf
> #boot=/dev/sda
> default=0
> timeout=5
> splashimage=(hd0,1)/grub/splash.xpm.gz
> hiddenmenu
> title Fedora Core 7
> root (hd0,1)
> kernel /vmlinuz-2.6.23.17-88.fc7 ro root=/dev/VolGroup00/LogVol00 rhgb 
> quiet
> initrd /initrd-2.6.23.17-88.fc7.img
> title Microsoft Windows XP
> rootnoverify (hd0,0)
> chainloader +1
> 
> I find many tutorials showing how to uninstall Linux from the second 
> partition and return 
> the machine back to the original XP configuration, but none really 
> documenting the 
> process going the other way (eg keeping linux and dumping xp). And I am 
> not even sure 
> it can be done.
> 
> Has anyone done this? If so, is there some documentation that I can sneak 
> a peak at to 
> help push me in the right direction?
> 
> Thanks in advance
> Michael

Have seen a number of replies to this original message, but there is one 
issue that I haven't seen addressed. 

In my reading of the setup, the disk is using the Windows ntldr as the primary 
boot loader, since the NTFS partition has the boot flag? It may be that boot 
loader has been changed to grub, but the boot flag is not on the linux boot 
partitions, so you might need to reload the grub boot loader to correct this. 

I would always do a full image backup before doing anything, so that if 
something doesn't work, you can put the machine back as it was.

Good Luck.

> 
> 
> ===
> 
> P Please consider the environment before printing this e-mail
> 
> Cleveland Clinic is ranked one of the top hospitals
> in America by U.S.News & World Report (2009).  
> Visit us online at http://www.clevelandclinic.org for
> a complete listing of our services, staff and
> locations.
> 
> 
> Confidentiality Note:  This message is intended for use
> only by the individual or entity to which it is addressed
> and may contain information that is privileged,
> confidential, and exempt from disclosure under applicable
> law.  If the reader of this message is not the intended
> recipient or the employee or agent responsible for
> delivering the message to the intended recipient, you are
> hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or
> copying of this communication is strictly prohibited.  If
> you have received this communication in error,  please
> contact the sender immediately and destroy the material in
> its entirety, whether electronic or hard copy.  Thank you.
> 


+--+
  Michael D. Setzer II -  Computer Science Instructor  
  Guam Community College  Computer Center  
  mailto:mi...@kuentos.guam.net
  mailto:msetze...@gmail.com
  http://www.guam.net/home/mikes
  Guam - Where America's Day Begins
  G4L Disk Imaging Project maintainer 
  http://sourceforge.net/projects/g4l/
+--+

http://setiathom

Re: Scrub free disk blocks

2010-08-29 Thread Michael D. Setzer II
On 29 Aug 2010 at 3:16, Bruno Wolff III wrote:

Date sent:  Sun, 29 Aug 2010 03:16:28 -0500
From:   Bruno Wolff III 
To: Marko Vojinovic 
Subject:Re: Scrub free disk blocks
Copies to:  users@lists.fedoraproject.org
Send reply to:  Community support for Fedora users 

<mailto:users-
requ...@lists.fedoraproject.org?subject=unsubscribe>
<mailto:users-
requ...@lists.fedoraproject.org?subject=subscribe>

> On Sun, Aug 29, 2010 at 07:46:49 +0100,
>   Marko Vojinovic  wrote:
> > 
> > Starting from the premise that every hard disk has in principle limited 
> > capacity to store data, one can always fill it up completely, then rewrite 
> > it 
> > completely again. I see no way of the old data being recoverable, because 
> > this 
> > is in contradiction with the fact that the disk was filled up completely 
> > two 
> > times. The old data has to be destroyed in order to make room for new data. 
> > At 
> > least as far as I can understand it.
> 
> At least at one time it was possible because the data is stored in a region
> and when overwriting the region you don't hit the same spot every time.
> With the right equipment you could see these areas and tell what data had
> been written in that spot in the past.
> 
> I have heard that with the current generation of disks this is no longer
> practical. But practical is mostly defined by what your budget is; so if the
> data is valuable enough, it is potentially recoverable.

Recalling a presentation at Defcon 2006, the space between tracks would 
contain information that could determin what was there before a format 
operation.  A DES level wipe required writing 7 different patterns to every 
sector to make this practically impossible. 

I don't do that level of wiping disk, but do use scripts to clear the unused 
space before doing disk/partition images. Makes a huge difference in the 
image size, since zeroed out sectors compress to almost nothing in the 
image file. Did an image of an 80GB disk after a full install of Fedora, and it 
made a 12GB image file. After clearing the image was only 2.5GB. 


> -- 
> users mailing list
> users@lists.fedoraproject.org
> To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
> https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
> Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines


+--+
  Michael D. Setzer II -  Computer Science Instructor  
  Guam Community College  Computer Center  
  mailto:mi...@kuentos.guam.net
  mailto:msetze...@gmail.com
  http://www.guam.net/home/mikes
  Guam - Where America's Day Begins
  G4L Disk Imaging Project maintainer 
  http://sourceforge.net/projects/g4l/
+--+

http://setiathome.berkeley.edu (Original)
Number of Seti Units Returned:  19,471
Processing time:  32 years, 290 days, 12 hours, 58 minutes
(Total Hours: 287,489)

bo...@home CREDITS
SETI 9925545.785910   |   EINSTEIN 4468268.520851
ROSETTA  2199349.596714   |   ABC  2320812.078459

-- 
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines


Re: Broken updates for F12

2010-09-10 Thread Michael D. Setzer II
On 10 Sep 2010 at 10:32, Paolo Galtieri wrote:

Date sent:  Fri, 10 Sep 2010 10:32:37 -0700
From:   Paolo Galtieri 
To: "Community assistance, encouragement,
and advice for using Fedora." 

Subject:Broken updates for F12
Send reply to:  Community support for Fedora users 

<mailto:users-
requ...@lists.fedoraproject.org?subject=unsubscribe>
<mailto:users-
requ...@lists.fedoraproject.org?subject=subscribe>

> Updates are broken on F12.  This seems to be a recurring theme.
> 
> --> Finished Dependency Resolution
> Error: Package: xulrunner-devel-unstable-1.9.1.12-1.fc12.x86_64 (updates)
> Requires: pkgconfig(nspr) >= 4.8.6
> Installed: nspr-devel-4.8.4-2.fc12.x86_64 (@updates)
> pkgconfig(nspr) = 4.8.4
> Available: nspr-devel-4.8.2-1.fc12.i686 (fedora)
> pkgconfig(nspr) = 4.8.2
> Error: Package: xulrunner-devel-1.9.1.12-1.fc12.x86_64 (updates)
> Requires: pkgconfig(nspr) >= 4.8.6
> Installed: nspr-devel-4.8.4-2.fc12.x86_64 (@updates)
> pkgconfig(nspr) = 4.8.4
> Available: nspr-devel-4.8.2-1.fc12.i686 (fedora)
> pkgconfig(nspr) = 4.8.2
> 

I also saw this same thing for the past few days. The nspr is now available in 
the update repo, so activating the update repo I was able to get it to install.



> This problem affects the following packages:
> 
> firefox.x86_64
> gnome-web-photo.x86_64
> xulrunner.x86_64
> xulrunner-devel.x86_64
> xulrunner-devel-unstable.x86_64
> 
> Paolo
> -- 
> users mailing list
> users@lists.fedoraproject.org
> To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
> https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
> Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines


+--+
  Michael D. Setzer II -  Computer Science Instructor  
  Guam Community College  Computer Center  
  mailto:mi...@kuentos.guam.net
  mailto:msetze...@gmail.com
  http://www.guam.net/home/mikes
  Guam - Where America's Day Begins
  G4L Disk Imaging Project maintainer 
  http://sourceforge.net/projects/g4l/
+--+

http://setiathome.berkeley.edu (Original)
Number of Seti Units Returned:  19,471
Processing time:  32 years, 290 days, 12 hours, 58 minutes
(Total Hours: 287,489)

bo...@home CREDITS
SETI 9950110.081933   |   EINSTEIN 4509686.400851
ROSETTA  2213368.594890   |   ABC  2417945.957627

-- 
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines


Re: Broken updates for F12

2010-09-10 Thread Michael D. Setzer II
On 11 Sep 2010 at 3:47, Michael D. Setzer II wrote:

From:   "Michael D. Setzer II" 
To: Community support for Fedora users 

Date sent:  Sat, 11 Sep 2010 03:47:38 +1000
Subject:Re: Broken updates for F12
Priority:   normal
Send reply to:  Community support for Fedora users 

<mailto:users-
requ...@lists.fedoraproject.org?subject=unsubscribe>
<mailto:users-
requ...@lists.fedoraproject.org?subject=subscribe>

> On 10 Sep 2010 at 10:32, Paolo Galtieri wrote:
> 
> Date sent:Fri, 10 Sep 2010 10:32:37 -0700
> From: Paolo Galtieri 
> To:   "Community assistance, encouragement,
>   and advice for using Fedora." 
> 
> Subject:  Broken updates for F12
> Send reply to:Community support for Fedora users 
> 
>   <mailto:users-
> requ...@lists.fedoraproject.org?subject=unsubscribe>
>   <mailto:users-
> requ...@lists.fedoraproject.org?subject=subscribe>
> 
> > Updates are broken on F12.  This seems to be a recurring theme.
> > 
> > --> Finished Dependency Resolution
> > Error: Package: xulrunner-devel-unstable-1.9.1.12-1.fc12.x86_64 (updates)
> > Requires: pkgconfig(nspr) >= 4.8.6
> > Installed: nspr-devel-4.8.4-2.fc12.x86_64 (@updates)
> > pkgconfig(nspr) = 4.8.4
> > Available: nspr-devel-4.8.2-1.fc12.i686 (fedora)
> > pkgconfig(nspr) = 4.8.2
> > Error: Package: xulrunner-devel-1.9.1.12-1.fc12.x86_64 (updates)
> > Requires: pkgconfig(nspr) >= 4.8.6
> > Installed: nspr-devel-4.8.4-2.fc12.x86_64 (@updates)
> > pkgconfig(nspr) = 4.8.4
> > Available: nspr-devel-4.8.2-1.fc12.i686 (fedora)
> > pkgconfig(nspr) = 4.8.2
> > 
> 
> I also saw this same thing for the past few days. The nspr is now available 
> in 
> the update repo, so activating the update repo I was able to get it to 
> install.
> 

Should have said the nspr is in update-testing repo.


> 
> 
> > This problem affects the following packages:
> > 
> > firefox.x86_64
> > gnome-web-photo.x86_64
> > xulrunner.x86_64
> > xulrunner-devel.x86_64
> > xulrunner-devel-unstable.x86_64
> > 
> > Paolo
> > -- 
> > users mailing list
> > users@lists.fedoraproject.org
> > To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
> > https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
> > Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
> 
> 
> +--+
>   Michael D. Setzer II -  Computer Science Instructor  
>   Guam Community College  Computer Center  
>   mailto:mi...@kuentos.guam.net
>   mailto:msetze...@gmail.com
>   http://www.guam.net/home/mikes
>   Guam - Where America's Day Begins
>   G4L Disk Imaging Project maintainer 
>   http://sourceforge.net/projects/g4l/
> +--+
> 
> http://setiathome.berkeley.edu (Original)
> Number of Seti Units Returned:  19,471
> Processing time:  32 years, 290 days, 12 hours, 58 minutes
> (Total Hours: 287,489)
> 
> bo...@home CREDITS
> SETI 9950110.081933   |   EINSTEIN 4509686.400851
> ROSETTA  2213368.594890   |   ABC  2417945.957627
> 
> -- 
> users mailing list
> users@lists.fedoraproject.org
> To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
> https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
> Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines


+--+
  Michael D. Setzer II -  Computer Science Instructor  
  Guam Community College  Computer Center  
  mailto:mi...@kuentos.guam.net
  mailto:msetze...@gmail.com
  http://www.guam.net/home/mikes
  Guam - Where America's Day Begins
  G4L Disk Imaging Project maintainer 
  http://sourceforge.net/projects/g4l/
+--+

http://setiathome.berkeley.edu (Original)
Number of Seti Units Returned:  19,471
Processing time:  32 years, 290 days, 12 hours, 58 minutes
(Total Hours: 287,489)

bo...@home CREDITS
SETI 9950110.081933   |   EINSTEIN 4509686.400851
ROSETTA  2213368.594890   |   ABC  2417945.957627

-- 
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines


Problem with USB KVM Switch.

2010-09-19 Thread Michael D. Setzer II
In switching from a Trendnet KV-400 swith to a USB 2.0 KVM Switch I am 
having a problem with the monitor coming up in 1024x768 mode instead of 
the 1280x1024. If I plug the monitor directly to this Fedora 12 machine, it 
comes up as 1280x1024?

The monitor is a Sceptre Tech Inc 19"  which is recognized by the fedora 
when it is connected directly to the machine with 1280x1024 with 60hz.

If I then hook the monitor back up thru the switch if works at the correct 
resolution, but expect that a restart will put it back to the 1024x768, and 
from 
the specs it should be running at 75hz. 

Haven't found a fedora drive for this monitor, and system-config-display 
doesn't show it.

Is this a problem with the KVM switch or with the Monitor using default 
settings. Don't understand why it sees the monitor as unknown even when it 
is the selected PC on the swich at boot up.

-- 
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines


Re: Problem with USB KVM Switch.

2010-09-19 Thread Michael D. Setzer II
On 19 Sep 2010 at 11:10, Joachim Backes wrote:

Date sent:  Sun, 19 Sep 2010 11:10:44 +0200
From:   Joachim Backes 
Organization:   University of Kaiserslautern 
To: Community support for Fedora users 
Subject:Re: Problem with USB KVM Switch.

> On 09/19/2010 11:03 AM, Michael D. Setzer II wrote:
> > In switching from a Trendnet KV-400 swith to a USB 2.0 KVM Switch I am 
> > having a problem with the monitor coming up in 1024x768 mode instead of 
> > the 1280x1024. If I plug the monitor directly to this Fedora 12 machine, it 
> > comes up as 1280x1024?
> > 
> > The monitor is a Sceptre Tech Inc 19"  which is recognized by the fedora 
> > when it is connected directly to the machine with 1280x1024 with 60hz.
> > 
> > If I then hook the monitor back up thru the switch if works at the correct 
> > resolution, but expect that a restart will put it back to the 1024x768, and 
> > from 
> > the specs it should be running at 75hz. 
> > 
> > Haven't found a fedora drive for this monitor, and system-config-display 
> > doesn't show it.
> > 
> > Is this a problem with the KVM switch or with the Monitor using default 
> > settings. Don't understand why it sees the monitor as unknown even when it 
> > is the selected PC on the swich at boot up.
> > 
> 
> Hi Michael,
> 
> some years ago I had similar problems (not with the model you
> mentioned). I could solve them by using a USB KVM switch with an *own
> power supply*.
> 
Thanks for the quick reply. The trendnet TK-400 has a external power port 
but this USB KVM MT-401UK doesn't a power plug, but the user manual 
says to add a DC 5V, 500mA-1A to the power jack, which it doesn't have?

I thought maybe having it connected to other computers via the USB would 
cover this, but it did not. Still came up in 1024x768 resolution.  It has 3 USB 
ports on the end to connect to keyboard and mouse perhaps the 3rd one can 
be used for power? The other end has the monitor port, and then monitor 
and USB ports for each of the computers? 

Strangely, the Fedora 10 machine comes up fine in 1280x1024 mode? So, 
why it works with 10 and not 12?





> Kind regards
> 
> -- 
> Joachim Backes 
> 
> http://www.rhrk.uni-kl.de/~backes
> 
> 


-- 
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines


Re: Problem with USB KVM Switch.

2010-09-19 Thread Michael D. Setzer II
On 19 Sep 2010 at 8:18, Tom Horsley wrote:

Date sent:  Sun, 19 Sep 2010 08:18:35 -0400
From:   Tom Horsley 
To: users@lists.fedoraproject.org
Subject:Re: Problem with USB KVM Switch.

> On Sun, 19 Sep 2010 19:03:25 +1000
> Michael D. Setzer II wrote:
> 
> > Is this a problem with the KVM switch or with the Monitor using default 
> > settings. Don't understand why it sees the monitor as unknown even when it 
> > is the selected PC on the swich at boot up.
> 
> Do you have the KVM switched to the system at the time it is booting?
> If not, very few KVM switches (possibly none of them) are smart enough
> to provide the EDID info that new versions of X insist on. I have heard
> rumor of kernel options to override EDID on the kernel boot line,
> but never seen an example.
> 
> If you do have it switched to the system while it is booting, then
> it is probably just a problem with the KVM switch (different switches
> are very spotty when it comes to supporting all this stuff correctly).
> 
> I have a 4 port usb/DVI switch that is branded IOGEAR but I think
> actually made by ATEN. It is the only KVM switch I've ever had that
> has worked pretty much flawlessly.

Have it working now, but had to do a number of things.
Found that adding nomodeset to the kernel line would get it to come up with 
the 1280x1024, but I had my userid set to have compiz, and it would not log 
in, but other accounts could log in ok. Had to remove compiz, and then could 
log into my id, but the the screens were not working correctly. Missing outer 
boxes. Finally found that a gnome subdirectory file had a compiz-gtk line in it 
under a sessions directory. Removing it, since it was in the other users 
directories fixed that issue finally.


> -- 
> users mailing list
> users@lists.fedoraproject.org
> To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
> https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
> Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines


-- 
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines


Mapping Key for keyboard with no regular insert key?

2010-09-26 Thread Michael D. Setzer II
Got some labs that have Logitec Internet keyboards that for some reason 
don't have an insert key above the regular arrow keys. For some reason it 
has a large delete key? 

With most programs one can turn off num lock and use that insert key, but 
had the windows tn5250 program that would not, so had to come up with a 
reg hack, and mapped the context menu button next to Ctrl on Rigth to 
Insert. 

Was looking to do something similar for something similar for linux, since 
machines also have Fedora 12.  

Thanks.
-- 
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines


Re: Mapping Key for keyboard with no regular insert key?

2010-09-26 Thread Michael D. Setzer II
On 26 Sep 2010 at 9:30, Bob Goodwin wrote:

Date sent:  Sun, 26 Sep 2010 09:30:37 -0400
From:   Bob Goodwin 
To: users@lists.fedoraproject.org
Subject:Re: Mapping Key for keyboard with no regular insert key?

>   On 26/09/10 08:14, Michael D. Setzer II wrote:
> > Got some labs that have Logitec Internet keyboards that for some reason
> > don't have an insert key above the regular arrow keys. For some reason it
> > has a large delete key?
> >
> > With most programs one can turn off num lock and use that insert key, but
> > had the windows tn5250 program that would not, so had to come up with a
> > reg hack, and mapped the context menu button next to Ctrl on Rigth to
> > Insert.
> >
> > Was looking to do something similar for something similar for linux, since
> > machines also have Fedora 12.
> >
> > Thanks.
> 
> xev should give you keycodes and then in a script I do something like:
> 
> /usr/bin/xmodmap -e 'keycode 134=degree'
> 
> /usr/bin/xmodmap -e 'keycode 135=mu'
> 
> /usr/bin/xmodmap -e 'keycode 66=NoSymbol'
> 
> /usr/bin/xmodmap -e 'keycode 133=cent'
> 
 
xmodmap -e 'keycode 135=Insert'

Tried that on my home machine, and it remapped the menu key to the Insert, 
so will try it on my lab machines on Monday. Thanks.



> -- 
> users mailing list
> users@lists.fedoraproject.org
> To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
> https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
> Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines


-- 
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines


LibreOffice Install Process.

2010-10-02 Thread Michael D. Setzer II
I download and setup the 64 bit version of the Fedora 13 machine using the 
following process. 

Extract the gz file
cd en-US
cd RPMS
rpm -Uvh *.rpm

that went fine with no problems

cd desktop-integration
ran the redhat rpm
It gave conflicts with openoffice
remove openoffice
reran redhat rpm, and it worked in the installation,
but the links did not work. Turned out they were running
libreoffice instead of the libreoffice3 from the /usr/bin.
So, I just created a link using ln -s libreoffice3 libreoffice

Don't know if this is the exact process that was meant to be done, or if it is 
the same with the 32 bit version?

Wondering if others have checked it out yet. 


-- 
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines


Re: rsync or dd to clone a hard drive?

2010-10-06 Thread Michael D. Setzer II
On 6 Oct 2010 at 10:58, Maxime Alarie wrote:

Subject:rsync or dd to clone a hard drive?
Date sent:  Wed, 6 Oct 2010 10:58:50 -0400
From:   "Maxime Alarie" 
To: 
Send reply to:  Community support for Fedora users 

<mailto:users-requ...@lists.fedoraproject.org?subject=unsubscribe>
<mailto:users-requ...@lists.fedoraproject.org?subject=subscribe>

> 
> I have never used dd to clone a hard disk.
> 
> I use rsync for a lot of my backups , and I was wondering what would be 
> the best tool to 
> clone a disk. I don’t want 3rd party software also. I want built in 
> command line tools.
> 
> I know rsync will resync where it left off if I encounter a problem, what 
> about dd? Do I 
> absolutely have to creat an image before cloning? Ex: dd if=/dev/sda 
> of=sda.img or I 
> can use dd if=/dev/sda of=/dev/sdb?
> 

I'm the maintainer of the g4l project that is a disk imaging program. It is 
usually used to boot a machine from the cd with a ramdisk, and then can 
make local or network images using dd and compress. Note: this is a full disk 
or full partition images. Not a file or directory level image.

It also has an option to clone, which is a similar process to you dd option 
going from one disk to another. 

ftp://amd64gcc.dyndns.org/g4l-v0.35alpha19.iso
ftp://amd64gcc.dyndns.org/g4l-v0.35a19.devel.tar.gz

or released version on sourceforge.



> Thanks.
> 
> 


+------+
  Michael D. Setzer II -  Computer Science Instructor  
  Guam Community College  Computer Center  
  mailto:mi...@kuentos.guam.net
  mailto:msetze...@gmail.com
  http://www.guam.net/home/mikes
  Guam - Where America's Day Begins
  G4L Disk Imaging Project maintainer 
  http://sourceforge.net/projects/g4l/
+--+

http://setiathome.berkeley.edu (Original)
Number of Seti Units Returned:  19,471
Processing time:  32 years, 290 days, 12 hours, 58 minutes
(Total Hours: 287,489)

bo...@home CREDITS
SETI10009860.871197   |   EINSTEIN 4660449.360851
ROSETTA  2297938.485565   |   ABC  2771227.136067

-- 
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines


Re: rsync or dd to clone a hard drive?

2010-10-07 Thread Michael D. Setzer II
On 7 Oct 2010 at 17:36, Bill Davidsen wrote:

To: users@lists.fedoraproject.org
From:   Bill Davidsen 
Subject:Re: rsync or dd to clone a hard drive?
Date sent:  Thu, 07 Oct 2010 17:36:08 -0400
Send reply to:  Community support for Fedora users 

<mailto:users-
requ...@lists.fedoraproject.org?subject=unsubscribe>
<mailto:users-
requ...@lists.fedoraproject.org?subject=subscribe>

> Kwan Lowe wrote:
> > On Wed, Oct 6, 2010 at 12:23 PM, Patrick Bartek  wrote:
> >> I would use dd to clone (or back up) an entire hard drive.  Easier.  You 
> >> can even pipe it through gzip to get a compressed image file.
> >
> > I do exactly that... dd piped through gzip then push through an SSH
> > session to a remote where it's extracted and written on the fly to
> > another LV.  I use it to move kvm LVs from machine to machine.  Works
> > great, but there's not much error checking.  If it's critical I do an
> > md5sum on the LVs at the end then compare.
> 

Cut part. 

Some comments on Compression. With my G4L project that backs up and 
restores disk and partitions using dd and compression.  I've also seem 
difference in the speed and load on cpu.  I've used lzop compression as the 
default option do to this.

In a small partition test these were the time results.
10 seconds with no compression
 3 seconds with lzop compression
 6 seconds with gzip compression
18 seconds with bzip compression

With full disk images the same machines take the following.
50 minutes with lzop
100 minutes with gzip

Intestingly, restoring both the lzop and gzip images only takes about 40 
minutes, so compression process takes more load compared to 
uncompressing. 

The general difference between the compression is about 10%. Also, lzop 
only seems to load the CPU at about 30% rather than the 80 - 90% of gzip.

There are lots of things that effect the speed, so this might vary based on the 
overall system and network. 
Good Luck.



> Bill Davidsen 
>"We have more to fear from the bungling of the incompetent than from
> the machinations of the wicked."  - from Slashdot
> 
> -- 
> users mailing list
> users@lists.fedoraproject.org
> To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
> https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
> Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines


+--+
  Michael D. Setzer II -  Computer Science Instructor  
  Guam Community College  Computer Center  
  mailto:mi...@kuentos.guam.net
  mailto:msetze...@gmail.com
  http://www.guam.net/home/mikes
  Guam - Where America's Day Begins
  G4L Disk Imaging Project maintainer 
  http://sourceforge.net/projects/g4l/
+--+

http://setiathome.berkeley.edu (Original)
Number of Seti Units Returned:  19,471
Processing time:  32 years, 290 days, 12 hours, 58 minutes
(Total Hours: 287,489)

bo...@home CREDITS
SETI10009860.871197   |   EINSTEIN 4666047.880851
ROSETTA  2301696.375998   |   ABC  2782904.713840

-- 
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines


Re: rsync or dd to clone a hard drive?

2010-10-08 Thread Michael D. Setzer II

On 8 Oct 2010 at 8:52, Daniel B. Thurman wrote:

Date sent:  Fri, 08 Oct 2010 08:52:27 -0700
From:   "Daniel B. Thurman" 
To: users@lists.fedoraproject.org
Subject:Re: rsync or dd to clone a hard drive?

Cut --

Good Questions..

> 1) How does 4GL compare with Clonezilla?

The one version seems similar to what g4l does with the cd running, where 
the bigger version has a database system that needs to be setup.

The one big difference is that g4l has a number of kernels on the cd image, 
since some hardware requires the latest kernels, and other hardware works 
with older version. So the user can boot from various kernels to find one that 
works with there hardware. I even have a method that can be used to add it 
to an ntfs partition to boot via grub4dos. 

As a side note, it seems at least for downloads the vast number of users are 
using windows for the download? About 200 - 300 per day.

> 
> 2) Why aren't "backup/restore/image/clone" programs such as (1) above
> integrated into LiveCDs that have most the Linux core, GUI, Network,
> ...,
> support?

I believe both the smaller version of clonezilla and g4l are included on parted 
magic live cd? The g4l script can also be downloaded, and if the support 
programs are there, it can be run from various cds. Have in the past made 
packages that included the script and some programs that distro live cds 
didn't include. Did that for knoppix and finnix, and these same ones worked 
with others. 

G4L can backup and restore LVM partitions, but currently can not mount 
them directly. It can use LVM partitions thru the ftp to store images on LVM 
partitions. 

> 
> 
> For the moment, I use rsync for linux copy/clones/moves from
> source to target partitions for the same hardware, and it works.
> 
>  I do these steps:
> 
>  (1) Boot with LiveCD
> 
>  (2) # rsync -ahHAX  
> 
>  Notes:
>  (a) Optionally add 'z' argument if you want compression and
>  add 'v' if you want to see verbosity at the expense of transfer
>  speed.
>  (b) Abruptly stopped?  No problem, run the above command again.
>  (c)  and/or  can be remote devices but they have
>  to be mounted. The  ought not be an active running
>  OS, can be mounted to /mnt via LiveCD. The hardware for the
>   &  ought to be exactly the same if one expects
>  the  OS to be bootable after transfer has
> completed.  I have
>  done this with (a) remote backup source to target and (b)
> between
>  two identical laptops transfers via LiveCD on both, and it
> works.
>  (d) I have not tried to create an rsync "image".  If it were
> possible
>  to create an rsync "image" with with FULL
> acls/permissions/..., how
>  would it be possible to perform an rsync "restore"?
>  I have not tried this.
> 

The disk and partition images are bit level backups, and so full filesystem is 
saved. Exception is NTFSCLONE backups of ntfspartitions, which are file 
only backups.  Also, since it is a bit level backup, pre-clearing of unused 
space makes the size of images much smaller. 

>  (3) Setting MBR on boot or / (boot integrated) partitions:
>  # grub
>   find /grub/stage1 (or /grub/grub.cfg)
>   root (hX,Y)
>   setup (hX,Y)
>   quit
> 

G4L can backup the MBR and partition table separately, or  include it in a full 
disk image.

>  (4) # touch /.autorelabel; reboot (for SELinux)
> 

Bit level makes all this the same. 

Thanks for the questions.

In conclussion, G4L is a tool to do disk and partition images, as contrasted to 
file level backups.


> FWIW,
> Dan
> 
> -- 
> users mailing list
> users@lists.fedoraproject.org
> To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
> https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
> Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines


+--+
  Michael D. Setzer II -  Computer Science Instructor  
  Guam Community College  Computer Center  
  mailto:mi...@kuentos.guam.net
  mailto:msetze...@gmail.com
  http://www.guam.net/home/mikes
  Guam - Where America's Day Begins
  G4L Disk Imaging Project maintainer 
  http://sourceforge.net/projects/g4l/
+--+

http://setiathome.berkeley.edu (Original)
Number of Seti Units Returned:  19,471
Processing time:  32 years, 290 days, 12 hours, 58 minutes
(Total Hours: 287,489)

bo...@home CRED

Re: rsync or dd to clone a hard drive?

2010-10-08 Thread Michael D. Setzer II
On 8 Oct 2010 at 16:21, Bill Davidsen wrote:

To: users@lists.fedoraproject.org
From:   Bill Davidsen 
Subject:Re: rsync or dd to clone a hard drive?
Date sent:  Fri, 08 Oct 2010 16:21:18 -0400

> Michael D. Setzer II wrote:
> > On 7 Oct 2010 at 17:36, Bill Davidsen wrote:
> >
> > To: users@lists.fedoraproject.org
> > From:   Bill Davidsen
> > Subject:Re: rsync or dd to clone a hard drive?
> > Date sent:  Thu, 07 Oct 2010 17:36:08 -0400
> >
> >> Kwan Lowe wrote:
> >>> On Wed, Oct 6, 2010 at 12:23 PM, Patrick Bartek   
> >>> wrote:
> >>>> I would use dd to clone (or back up) an entire hard drive.  Easier.  You 
> >>>> can even pipe it through gzip to get a compressed image file.
> >>>
> >>> I do exactly that... dd piped through gzip then push through an SSH
> >>> session to a remote where it's extracted and written on the fly to
> >>> another LV.  I use it to move kvm LVs from machine to machine.  Works
> >>> great, but there's not much error checking.  If it's critical I do an
> >>> md5sum on the LVs at the end then compare.
> >>
> >
> > Cut part.
> >
> > Some comments on Compression. With my G4L project that backs up and
> > restores disk and partitions using dd and compression.  I've also seem
> > difference in the speed and load on cpu.  I've used lzop compression as the
> > default option do to this.
> >
> > In a small partition test these were the time results.
> > 10 seconds with no compression
> >   3 seconds with lzop compression
> >   6 seconds with gzip compression
> > 18 seconds with bzip compression
> >
> > With full disk images the same machines take the following.
> > 50 minutes with lzop
> > 100 minutes with gzip
> >
> > Intestingly, restoring both the lzop and gzip images only takes about 40
> > minutes, so compression process takes more load compared to
> > uncompressing.
> >
> > The general difference between the compression is about 10%. Also, lzop
> > only seems to load the CPU at about 30% rather than the 80 - 90% of gzip.
> >
> > There are lots of things that effect the speed, so this might vary based on 
> > the
> > overall system and network.
> > Good Luck.
> >
> A lot depends on the speed of the network and the CPU. If I were in Europe 
> using 
> a 128k ISDN connection, I might well run gzip at a low level, because while 
> lzop 
> is fast, the compression suffers. I might even use lzma with the -1 or -2 
> option, since that can be faster than bzip2, and produces better compression. 
> And for backug up sparse files on a file basis, the -S (sparse) option of tar 
> can make a big difference.

I wouldn't suggest attempting to do disk or partition images over 128K or 
most broadband connection. With a 100MB network, it takes about 50 
minutes to image an 80GB disk image to about 14GB in my case.  Can make 
a 9GB image file of a 40GB partition using ntfsclone option in about 12 
minutes. I would suggest making an image to a local USB or other local 
machine, and then file could be sent using any transfer option.

>tar -cSf - *.img | ssh foo "tar xSf -"
> might reduce the bytes transferred better than compression, depending on file 
> content.

that is a file level backup, whereas g4l's purpose is to mainly make full disk 
or 
partitionimages.

> 
> As you said, "lots of things effect the speed." Pick the compression which 
> produces output slightly faster than the network and you get close to 
> optimal. 
> Use of a buffering program can keep the network loaded, things like bcopy or 
> ptbuf are examples.
> 

One thing I didn't mention in earlier messages, that I add g4l to my regular 
grub menu on fedora machines to be able to run it directly from grub.

> -- 
> Bill Davidsen 
>"We have more to fear from the bungling of the incompetent than from
> the machinations of the wicked."  - from Slashdot
> 
> -- 
> users mailing list
> users@lists.fedoraproject.org
> To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
> https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
> Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines


+--+
  Michael D. Setzer II -  Computer Science Instructor  
  Guam Community College  Computer Center  
  mailto:mi...@kuentos.guam.net
  mailto:msetze...@gmail.com
  http://www.guam.net/home/mikes
  Guam - W

OT:How to disable a built-in kernel module?

2010-10-15 Thread Michael D. Setzer II
I have a project in which I build most nic and disk modules into the kernel 
file 
so it will support hardware with any of the devices. In most cases this works 
just fine with the kernel only loading the correct ones. But rarely, it stops 
on a 
module that is not in the hardware. The latest one is the myri10ge module for 
one users. I have built a kernel for this user with this module disable, but 
would like to know if there is a kernel command line option to disable module. 
blacklist doesn't seem to work with built-in modules.

Thanks.

-- 
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines


Re: OT:How to disable a built-in kernel module?

2010-10-15 Thread Michael D. Setzer II
On 15 Oct 2010 at 18:30, Bryn M. Reeves wrote:

Date sent:  Fri, 15 Oct 2010 18:30:01 +0100
From:   "Bryn M. Reeves" 
To: Community support for Fedora users 

Subject:Re: OT:How to disable a built-in kernel module?

> On 10/15/2010 06:21 PM, Konstantin Svist wrote:
> >   On 10/15/2010 02:33 AM, Michael D. Setzer II wrote:
> >> I have a project in which I build most nic and disk modules into the 
> >> kernel file
> >> so it will support hardware with any of the devices. In most cases this 
> >> works
> >> just fine with the kernel only loading the correct ones. But rarely, it 
> >> stops on a
> >> module that is not in the hardware. The latest one is the myri10ge module 
> >> for
> >> one users. I have built a kernel for this user with this module disable, 
> >> but
> >> would like to know if there is a kernel command line option to disable 
> >> module.
> >> blacklist doesn't seem to work with built-in modules.
> >>
> >> Thanks.
> >>
> > 
> > inside /etc/modprobe.d/blacklist.conf:
> > install  /bin/true
> 
> The OP is talking about components that have been configured to be
> linked into the main kernel image  (i.e. they are not modules at all).
> Any modprobe.conf/modprobe.d hacks will only affect things built as
> separate object files (.ko files, or .o for 2.4 and earlier).
> 
> To answer the original question: generally speaking, you can't unless
> the component itself provides some mechanism for it to be disabled via a
> kernel command line option.
> 
> The ability to completely disable certain modules is one of the benefits
> of having a modular kernel build in the first place.

Thanks for the info. The cd image includes a number of kernels with various 
kernels, to support wide hardware. Sometimes the latest kernel works, but 
sometimes older ones work. That is why the kernels are built as single files. 

As an additional note, just heard back from the user, and the kernel without 
the module, still stops, but now it stops at the module listed in the config 
before that one, so now disabling the one after that in the kernel config file.

I had hoped the debug kernel option might show more info, but seems to be 
the same. 

Again, thanks for the info.


> 
> Regards,
> Bryn.
> 
> -- 
> users mailing list
> users@lists.fedoraproject.org
> To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
> https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
> Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines


-- 
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines


Re: Resizing PVs (was: Installation Impressions)

2011-02-05 Thread Michael D. Setzer II
http://fedorasolved.org/Members/zcat/shrink-lvm-for-new-partition

Does that link have the information for handling the physical resizing?

I had used the LVM option in the past, but have gone to making regular 
partitions on install, but do have some machines with old LVM setups. 

+--+
  Michael D. Setzer II -  Computer Science Instructor  
  Guam Community College  Computer Center  
  mailto:mi...@kuentos.guam.net
  mailto:msetze...@gmail.com
  http://www.guam.net/home/mikes
  Guam - Where America's Day Begins
  G4L Disk Imaging Project maintainer 
  http://sourceforge.net/projects/g4l/
+--+

http://setiathome.berkeley.edu (Original)
Number of Seti Units Returned:  19,471
Processing time:  32 years, 290 days, 12 hours, 58 minutes
(Total Hours: 287,489)

BOINC@HOME CREDITS
SETI10331255.834230   |   EINSTEIN 5371421.810851
ROSETTA  2765286.340461   |   ABC  4335306.527607

-- 
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines


Re: My "swap" space seems to have vanished....

2011-03-18 Thread Michael D. Setzer II
On 18 Mar 2011 at 15:34, Martin Airs wrote:

From:   Martin Airs 
To: users@lists.fedoraproject.org
Subject:Re: My "swap" space seems to have vanished
Date sent:  Fri, 18 Mar 2011 15:34:10 +
Send reply to:  Martin Airs ,
Community support for Fedora users 
<mailto:users-requ...@lists.fedoraproject.org?subject=unsubscribe>
<mailto:users-requ...@lists.fedoraproject.org?subject=subscribe>

> On Friday 18 Mar 2011 14:46:23 DB wrote:
> >   df
> > Filesystem   1K-blocks  Used Available Use% Mounted on
> > /dev/sda2 28833848   5518600  23022388  20% /
> > tmpfs  1899484  1068   1898416   1% /dev/shm
> > /dev/sda1   474440 50462399481  12% /boot
> > /dev/sda3288370940  26611056 247111416  10% /home
> > 
> 

Your swap is part of the LVM partitions.
cat /proc/partitions

On mine it shows
major minor  #blocks  name

   80  488386584 sda
   81 204800 sda1
   82   32696288 sda2
   83  455482912 sda3
 2530   27123712 dm-0
 25315570560 dm-1

In this case dm-1 is the swap partition. 

swapon -s shows the status of the swap.

On my system.
FilenameTypeSizeUsed  Priority
/dev/dm-1   partition   5570556 2156 -1




> df -h on my system doesn't show swap either
> 
> [martin@desktop ~]$ df -h
> FilesystemSize  Used Avail Use% Mounted on
> /dev/mapper/VolGroup-lv_root
>22G   20G  904M  96% /
> tmpfs1005M  3.3M 1001M   1% /dev/shm
> /dev/sda1 194M   62M  123M  34% /boot
> /dev/mapper/VolGroup-lv_home
>50G   38G  9.5G  80% /home
> /dev/sdb1 112G   95G   18G  85% /media/disk
> 
> > 
> > Dave
> > 
> > uname -ar
> > Linux Fedora-Blue 2.6.35.11-83.fc14.x86_64 #1 SMP Mon Feb 7 07:06:44 UTC
> > 2011 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux
> 
> however if i type free -m
> [martin@desktop ~]$ free -m
>  total   used   free sharedbuffers cached
> Mem:  2008   1759248  0100585
> -/+ buffers/cache:   1073934
> Swap: 3967     16   3951
> 
> my swap is indeed there, does free show swap on your system??
> 
> Martin
> 


+--+
  Michael D. Setzer II -  Computer Science Instructor  
  Guam Community College  Computer Center  
  mailto:mi...@kuentos.guam.net
  mailto:msetze...@gmail.com
  http://www.guam.net/home/mikes
  Guam - Where America's Day Begins
  G4L Disk Imaging Project maintainer 
  http://sourceforge.net/projects/g4l/
+--+

http://setiathome.berkeley.edu (Original)
Number of Seti Units Returned:  19,471
Processing time:  32 years, 290 days, 12 hours, 58 minutes
(Total Hours: 287,489)

BOINC@HOME CREDITS
SETI10474090.320892   |   EINSTEIN 5585927.860851
ROSETTA  2919362.839735   |   ABC  4953969.420929

-- 
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines


Re: Libreoffice calculation [OT]

2011-03-21 Thread Michael D. Setzer II
Why not just enter the regular number in the columns, and just do 
the formula in the total column?

Just enter the wins in Columns B thru G Then in H put the 
formula.
H3 would have, with x1 thru x5 replaced with your numbers.

=B3*x1+c3*x2+d3*x3+e3*x4+g3*x5

Otherwise, you could enter the number in one column, and have 
the formula to multiply it in the next. 


On 21 Mar 2011 at 22:03, Mike Chambers wrote:

Subject:Re: Libreoffice calculation [OT]
From:   Mike Chambers 
To: Fedora 
Copies to:  "Michael D. Setzer II" 

Date sent:  Mon, 21 Mar 2011 22:03:30 -0500

> On Tue, 2011-03-22 at 12:47 +1000, Michael D. Setzer II wrote:
> > Not real clear on what you are trying to do.
> 
> Basically what I am messing with, is the March Madness bracket office
> pool we have at work.  I take the number of wins for a round (example, 5
> wins) and want to be able to just input that number into the cell, and
> have it automatically multiply by a set number that scores for that
> round (example, 10).
> 
> Maybe this will help
> 
> Round 2 scores 4 points per win.  Someone gets 10 wins for that round.
> That would be 40 total points for that round.  So I want to be able to
> just input the 10 and have it automatically multiply by 4 for me,
> instead of doing it in my head/on calculator.  I also will be printing
> this sheet out (maybe converting to html first) to let everyone keep
> updated with the scores.  So except for the info for the brackets,
> nothing else needs to be on there.
> 
> Gonna post a URL to let you see what it currently looks like (html form)
> to get an idea of what I want seen.  Any calculations that need done are
> to be hidden and not seen.
> 
> http://www.miketc.net/bracket.html
> 
> -- 
> Mike Chambers
> Madisonville, KY
> 
> "The best town on Earth!"
> 


+--+
  Michael D. Setzer II -  Computer Science Instructor  
  Guam Community College  Computer Center  
  mailto:mi...@kuentos.guam.net
  mailto:msetze...@gmail.com
  http://www.guam.net/home/mikes
  Guam - Where America's Day Begins
  G4L Disk Imaging Project maintainer 
  http://sourceforge.net/projects/g4l/
+--+

http://setiathome.berkeley.edu (Original)
Number of Seti Units Returned:  19,471
Processing time:  32 years, 290 days, 12 hours, 58 minutes
(Total Hours: 287,489)

BOINC@HOME CREDITS
SETI10490968.605283   |   EINSTEIN 5602714.540851
ROSETTA  2933735.693119   |   ABC  5004638.189001

-- 
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines


Re: AMD Phenom(tm) II X4 955 Processor runs only between 800-2700 Mhz

2011-05-31 Thread Michael D. Setzer II
On 1 Jun 2011 at 6:35, Jörn Rink wrote:

Date sent:  Wed, 1 Jun 2011 06:35:42 +0200
From:   Jörn Rink 
To: fedora-l...@redhat.com
Subject:AMD Phenom(tm) II X4 955 Processor runs only 
between 800-2700 Mhz
Send reply to:  Community support for Fedora users 

<mailto:users-
requ...@lists.fedoraproject.org?subject=unsubscribe>
<mailto:users-
requ...@lists.fedoraproject.org?subject=subscribe>

> Hi,
> i have fedora 14 and since i updated my mainboard, i recognized,
> that the cpufreq max is not right.
> 
> The cpu is clocked at 4.000 Mhz but in fedora i only get 2700 max.
> 
What command are you using to get this number?
lshw-gui shows this for the first part of the cpu info.
(From saved info)


 CPU
 AMD Phenom(tm) II X4 955 Processor
 Hynix Semiconductor (Hyundai 
Electronics)
 4
 cpu@0
 AMD Phenom(tm) II X4 955 Processor
 To Be Filled By O.E.M.
 AM2
 32
 32
 64
 2
 
  
  
 

Also tried cpupower, but it seems to be for intel cpus only?


> Any ideas?
> Greetings,
>  Nine
> 
> -- 
> Nine (not 9)
> Never trust a hippie
> -- 
> users mailing list
> users@lists.fedoraproject.org
> To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
> https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
> Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines


+----------+
  Michael D. Setzer II -  Computer Science Instructor  
  Guam Community College  Computer Center  
  mailto:mi...@kuentos.guam.net
  mailto:msetze...@gmail.com
  http://www.guam.net/home/mikes
  Guam - Where America's Day Begins
  G4L Disk Imaging Project maintainer 
  http://sourceforge.net/projects/g4l/
+--+

http://setiathome.berkeley.edu (Original)
Number of Seti Units Returned:  19,471
Processing time:  32 years, 290 days, 12 hours, 58 minutes
(Total Hours: 287,489)

BOINC@HOME CREDITS
SETI10816181.097822   |   EINSTEIN 5952662.550851
ROSETTA  3194562.09   |   ABC  6057757.348810

-- 
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines


preupgrade from FC12 to FC14 issues?

2010-11-06 Thread Michael D. Setzer II
I've just used preupgrade to upgrade some systems in my clasroom lab that 
has XP and Fedora 12. I had earlier done a test with fedora 13, but it had 
some issues the upgrade. The upgrade from 12 to 14 seems to have handled 
the problem with the older Nvidia cards these machines have, but there are a 
few issues.

I saw the same issue with system-config-display that has been mentioned, 
and also found that vim-common and vim-enhanced where still the fc12 
version? It also left the 3 fc12 kernels and kmods nvidias for the 3. I removed 
those and then installed the fc14 versions of the vim rpms. 

The one issue that I'm have trouble with is Flash and firefox. Google chrome 
works fine, and I was able to it working with firefox after I did a number of 
things. I then tried to figure out exactly what I did, and it didn't work on 
another machine? 

Even the machine I got it working on, I then logged in with another user, and 
it didn't work for that user?


-- 
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines


memtest on Fedora 14

2010-11-11 Thread Michael D. Setzer II
I upgraded 18 of the 20 machines in my classroom to Fedora 14 from 12 
using preupgrade. (Actually did 1, and imaged to the other 17 machines). All 
but one worked fine. I originally thought it was a disk issue, but after 
eliminating that as the issue went to ran a memtest cycle from my g4l cd and 
discovered it had a bad memory stick. Not sure why the Fedora 12 or XP 
never had any issues with it. But replaced the bad ram, and got it running 
after that.

I did come up with a few things. The memtest was an option on the grub 
menu with the Fedora 12, but somehow it was no longer in the grub.conf 
after the upgrade, but the memtest program had be upgraded? I wanted to 
check the other machines to make none of the others had ram issues. I ran 
memtest-setup, and it added the memtest options, but it would not work? It 
had the kernel --type=netbsd /elf-memtest86+-4.10
Changing to kernel /memtest86+-4.10 worked thou...

Not sure if others have seen this?

-- 
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines


Question on /var/named permissions

2010-12-15 Thread Michael D. Setzer II
I was looking in the /var/log/messages and saw messages about permission 
when righting named files to /var/named. In looking, I found the directories 
have root as the owner with rwx or rw but named was group with r-x or r--.
Changed the mode so named group had same rights as owner, and 
messages no longer show up. 

Just use the caching named, and this machine was upgraded to 14 from 12, 
so not sure if this is an issue with upgrade versus clean install.


+--+
  Michael D. Setzer II -  Computer Science Instructor  
  Guam Community College  Computer Center  
  mailto:mi...@kuentos.guam.net
  mailto:msetze...@gmail.com
  http://www.guam.net/home/mikes
  Guam - Where America's Day Begins
  G4L Disk Imaging Project maintainer 
  http://sourceforge.net/projects/g4l/
+--+

http://setiathome.berkeley.edu (Original)
Number of Seti Units Returned:  19,471
Processing time:  32 years, 290 days, 12 hours, 58 minutes
(Total Hours: 287,489)

bo...@home CREDITS
SETI10119018.500954   |   EINSTEIN 5086853.040851
ROSETTA  2599032.707714   |   ABC  3694200.474661

-- 
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines


Re: About programing, a general question

2010-12-17 Thread Michael D. Setzer II
On 17 Dec 2010 at 15:08, Parshwa Murdia wrote:

Date sent:  Fri, 17 Dec 2010 15:08:46 +0530
Subject:Re: About programing, a general question
From:   Parshwa Murdia 
To: Community support for Fedora users 
Send reply to:  Community support for Fedora users 

<mailto:users-requ...@lists.fedoraproject.org?subject=unsubscribe>
<mailto:users-requ...@lists.fedoraproject.org?subject=subscribe>

> 
> On Fri, Dec 17, 2010 at 9:18 AM, James McKenzie  
> wrote:
> 
> 
> 
> 
> COBOL is still very much in use in the financial industry and will
> probably be so for years to come. It helped me out in my last job as I
> was handed a print-out and found the problem in a matter of minutes.
> Missing punctuation (period.)
> 
> James McKenzie
> 
> 
> But I guess C would be good!
> 

OpenCobol is an implementation of COBOL that works on Linux and 
windows, and it takes Cobol code, but converts it into C that is then compiled.

I have heard of a number of projects being migrated from mainframe systems 
to opencobol. The C code does the job, but writing it in C is generally 
smaller, 
but a lot of work. 


> 
> -- 
> 
> Regards,
> Parshwa Murdia


+------+
  Michael D. Setzer II -  Computer Science Instructor  
  Guam Community College  Computer Center  
  mailto:mi...@kuentos.guam.net
  mailto:msetze...@gmail.com
  http://www.guam.net/home/mikes
  Guam - Where America's Day Begins
  G4L Disk Imaging Project maintainer 
  http://sourceforge.net/projects/g4l/
+--+

http://setiathome.berkeley.edu (Original)
Number of Seti Units Returned:  19,471
Processing time:  32 years, 290 days, 12 hours, 58 minutes
(Total Hours: 287,489)

bo...@home CREDITS
SETI10119018.500954   |   EINSTEIN 5086853.040851
ROSETTA  2599032.707714   |   ABC  3694200.474661

-- 
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines


Xorg 100% lockup drm wait idle failed status

2010-12-17 Thread Michael D. Setzer II
Occasionally, have Xorg lock up. I can vnc into the machine or sshd into it 
and see that Xorg is running at 100%. Running a shutdown from the vnc or 
sshd brings the machine back up.

There are a number of lines in the message file with this error.

setzco kernel: [3.942405] [drm] wait idle failed status : 0xA0003030 
0x0003

The on-board video is a radeon hd 3300

Have found a number of hits on this, but none that seem to be a solution.


+--+
  Michael D. Setzer II -  Computer Science Instructor  
  Guam Community College  Computer Center  
  mailto:mi...@kuentos.guam.net
  mailto:msetze...@gmail.com
  http://www.guam.net/home/mikes
  Guam - Where America's Day Begins
  G4L Disk Imaging Project maintainer 
  http://sourceforge.net/projects/g4l/
+--+

http://setiathome.berkeley.edu (Original)
Number of Seti Units Returned:  19,471
Processing time:  32 years, 290 days, 12 hours, 58 minutes
(Total Hours: 287,489)

bo...@home CREDITS
SETI10119018.500954   |   EINSTEIN 5086853.040851
ROSETTA  2599032.707714   |   ABC  3694200.474661

-- 
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines


Re: Merry Christmas

2010-12-26 Thread Michael D. Setzer II
On 26 Dec 2010 at 20:04, Tim wrote:

Subject:Re: Merry Christmas
From:   Tim 
To: Community support for Fedora users 

Date sent:  Sun, 26 Dec 2010 20:04:57 +1030
Send reply to:  Community support for Fedora users 

<mailto:users-
requ...@lists.fedoraproject.org?subject=unsubscribe>
<mailto:users-
requ...@lists.fedoraproject.org?subject=subscribe>

> Tim:
> >> I sent my Christmas card in early, but I think people were probably
> >> ignoring that (very long off-topic) thread.  Here it is again:
> >> 
> >> http://i55.tinypic.com/2whp10j.jpg 
> 
> Hiisi:
> > Wow! Cool! Did you actually made it recently (a few days ago, when
> > contributing to the longest thread of the year nomination) or is it from
> > your archive?
> 
> Well, the card's from 1984, but I filled it in on the day I posted the
> picture.  I still have a few of these cards stashed about the place,
> they made good bookmarks.
> 

I still give punch cards to my students in Intro, Cobol and RPG classes to 
show them how programming was done when I started in the mid 70's on an 
IBM 1130 with 4K of ram. Don't have a keypunch machine any more, but 
long ago wrote a program to demonstart the process. 
ftp://guam.packet.org/HOLL5.EXE

Old QB program that works with dosbox on linux.
Note: No lower case letters in code, but it does have most of the keyboard 
characters. 

Long ago, we use to make wreaths and chains for christmast out of them..

Merry Christmas.


> -- 
> [...@localhost ~]$ uname -r
> 2.6.27.25-78.2.56.fc9.i686
> 
> Don't send private replies to my address, the mailbox is ignored.  I
> read messages from the public lists.
> 
> 
> 
> -- 
> users mailing list
> users@lists.fedoraproject.org
> To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
> https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
> Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines


+--+
  Michael D. Setzer II -  Computer Science Instructor  
  Guam Community College  Computer Center  
  mailto:mi...@kuentos.guam.net
  mailto:msetze...@gmail.com
  http://www.guam.net/home/mikes
  Guam - Where America's Day Begins
  G4L Disk Imaging Project maintainer 
  http://sourceforge.net/projects/g4l/
+--+

http://setiathome.berkeley.edu (Original)
Number of Seti Units Returned:  19,471
Processing time:  32 years, 290 days, 12 hours, 58 minutes
(Total Hours: 287,489)

bo...@home CREDITS
SETI10133069.869252   |   EINSTEIN 5136330.130851
ROSETTA  261.948319   |   ABC  3789571.029891

-- 
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines


.xsession-error file getting large?

2011-01-09 Thread Michael D. Setzer II
Found that .xsession-error file had somehow grown to over 2GB. 
Found a large number of lines linked to Package kit update applet, so have 
disable it. 

Noticed that used space on / had gone from normal 14GB used size to 
16GB. Didn't quickly find where the space was until using the option to list 
the . files. Haven't noticed this in the past, so wondering if others have seen 
this?

+--+
  Michael D. Setzer II -  Computer Science Instructor  
  Guam Community College  Computer Center  
  mailto:mi...@kuentos.guam.net
  mailto:msetze...@gmail.com
  http://www.guam.net/home/mikes
  Guam - Where America's Day Begins
  G4L Disk Imaging Project maintainer 
  http://sourceforge.net/projects/g4l/
+--+

http://setiathome.berkeley.edu (Original)
Number of Seti Units Returned:  19,471
Processing time:  32 years, 290 days, 12 hours, 58 minutes
(Total Hours: 287,489)

bo...@home CREDITS
SETI10208500.931628   |   EINSTEIN 5231010.180851
ROSETTA  2676970.853922   |   ABC  3986888.307193

-- 
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines


Re: .xsession-error file getting large?

2011-01-09 Thread Michael D. Setzer II
On 9 Jan 2011 at 9:27, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:

Subject:Re: .xsession-error file getting large?
From:   Patrick O'Callaghan 
To: users@lists.fedoraproject.org
Date sent:  Sun, 09 Jan 2011 09:27:54 -0430

> On Sun, 2011-01-09 at 23:21 +1000, Michael D. Setzer II wrote: 
> > Found that .xsession-error file had somehow grown to over 2GB. 
> > Found a large number of lines linked to Package kit update applet, so have 
> > disable it. 
> > 
> > Noticed that used space on / had gone from normal 14GB used size to 
> > 16GB. Didn't quickly find where the space was until using the option to 
> > list 
> > the . files. Haven't noticed this in the past, so wondering if others have 
> > seen 
> > this?
> 
> Mine is under 1MB. You may have a problem with your X configuration
> and .xsession-errors is trying to tell you about it.

At the moment my .xsession-error file is 3889 bytes in size. Checked some 
other machines, and they also had the large number of lines about the gpk-
update-icon.


> 
> poc
> 
> -- 
> users mailing list
> users@lists.fedoraproject.org
> To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
> https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
> Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines


-- 
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines


GNOME Login Sound - Startup application issue

2011-01-10 Thread Michael D. Setzer II
Was recently looking some log files, and found that this wasn't working since 
the file or whatever it was trying to play wasn't working.

The original setting was to play an --id=

/usr/bin/canberra-gtk-play --id="desktop-login" --description="GNOME Login"

Not sure if that --id="desktop-login" is suppose to be pointing to something or 
set somewhere else, but on both a clean install and an update from 12 to 14, 
it shows that it doesn't work.

I modified the option to use a sound file I located on the system, and it seems 
to work fine at playing the sound on login.

/usr/bin/canberra-gtk-play -f /usr/share/sounds/KDE-Sys-Log-In.ogg --
description="GNOME Login"

Not sure if I've missed something, but it is enabled as a startup app, but 
doesn't work (at least no playing) on my setups.


-- 
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines


RT2500 wireless nic??

2010-01-15 Thread Michael D. Setzer II
Does anyone know how to get a wireless RT2500 to work?
Have a co-worker that has an old P4 notebook that has this nic for wireless. 
Long ago, I had gotten it working with a sourceforge driver, but when I 
upgraded it to Fedora 11 that method wouldn't work. I just upgraded the 
machine to Fedora 12, and I can get the machine to see wireless hubs, but it 
always fails to get an IP. 

Tried the sourceforge info again, and it fails to build. 

Seems the RT2500 is now included in later kernels, but it doesn't connect 
with the hub with the network manager, or system-config-network, or using 
wlassistant.

Thanks.

+--+
  Michael D. Setzer II -  Computer Science Instructor  
  Guam Community College  Computer Center  
  mailto:mi...@kuentos.guam.net
  mailto:msetze...@gmail.com
  http://www.guam.net/home/mikes
  Guam - Where America's Day Begins
+--+

http://setiathome.berkeley.edu (Original)
Number of Seti Units Returned:  19,471
Processing time:  32 years, 290 days, 12 hours, 58 minutes
(Total Hours: 287,489)

bo...@home CREDITS
SETI  9,189,768.448939 | EINSTEIN  3,637,432.310851
ROSETTA   1,623,619.296204 | ABC  36,994.134399

-- 
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines


What is seapplet?? Running at 97% and 100% of CPU.

2010-02-07 Thread Michael D. Setzer II
Started out that I thought this was an issue with a new install, but just 
checked my home AMD 64 Phenom II and it has one of its CPUs running at 
100% with seapplet as well. Don't see anything on P4 systems?
==Start of issue ==
I've just setup an older AMD 64 machine with Fedora 12, and just saw 
seapplet running at 97% of the CPU. Didn't see this running at this level 
before today. Got nothing on the man with the command so wondering what 
this is. Just installed it on Saturday, so perhaps this is something that runs 
after setup. The process is on my other machines P4 machines, but not 
running at any level. 

Anyone know exactly why this is happen? Why or how to fix it?
On the single core machine I changed the nice level to 19 so now it is only 
running at 49% or CPU.

+----------+
  Michael D. Setzer II -  Computer Science Instructor  
  Guam Community College  Computer Center  
  mailto:mi...@kuentos.guam.net
  mailto:msetze...@gmail.com
  http://www.guam.net/home/mikes
  Guam - Where America's Day Begins
+--+

http://setiathome.berkeley.edu (Original)
Number of Seti Units Returned:  19,471
Processing time:  32 years, 290 days, 12 hours, 58 minutes
(Total Hours: 287,489)

bo...@home CREDITS
SETI  9,333,574.544362 | EINSTEIN  3,729,771.530851
ROSETTA   1,679,724.591796 | ABC  85,774.083838

-- 
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines


Fedora 20 Cups pstopxl/gstopxl still broken

2014-01-06 Thread Michael D. Setzer II
Was doing a clean install on new Lenova i7 machines for my classroom labs, 
and couldn't get the printer to work. Had no problem setting up the printer, 
but test prints just resulted in printer stopped.  Tried all kinds of things, 
and 
the Fedora 17 machines were printing just fine. 

Finally ran system-config-printer, and was actually able to see an error 
message, but it was not correct either.

Was reporting that it couldn't find the file /usr/ib64/cups/filter/pstopxl.

Then I recalled this error from long long ago with an older version of Fedora, 
seems that the file was changed from pstopxl to gstopxl, so creating a link to 
the correct name fixed the problem, but it was in /usr/lib/cups/filter...

I recall putting this in a bug report or someone else had already done it, but 
it 
was long ago. Not sure why this issue hasn't been fixed? Either have the link 
include, or have the printer setup use the correct name.

I've got to get 21 machines setup in just over a week for the start of the 
semester. Old machines are 8 years old, so nice to get new ones, but having 
to refix a problem that should have already been corrected. 

Is there some other method that can be used to make sure this is corrected, 
or there another method that should be used. 


+----------+
  Michael D. Setzer II -  Computer Science Instructor  
  Guam Community College  Computer Center  
  mailto:mi...@kuentos.guam.net
  mailto:msetze...@gmail.com
  http://www.guam.net/home/mikes
  Guam - Where America's Day Begins
  G4L Disk Imaging Project maintainer 
  http://sourceforge.net/projects/g4l/
+--+

http://setiathome.berkeley.edu (Original)
Number of Seti Units Returned:  19,471
Processing time:  32 years, 290 days, 12 hours, 58 minutes
(Total Hours: 287,489)

BOINC@HOME CREDITS
ROSETTA  9801631.804879   |   SETI17197146.741356
ABC 16611686.340441   |   EINSTEIN14946049.679852

-- 
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org


fastestmirror exclude doesn't seem to be working?

2014-01-07 Thread Michael D. Setzer II
I've used the exclude option to exclude .au, .nz. and .cz, and in the past it 
has worked find. Now in setting up new systems with Fedora 20, it doesn't 
seem to work. I'm located on Guam, and it appears that the process sees 
identifies AU and NZ as being closer, but the internet connect to there is very 
slow. Was just doing a yum install, and getting 68K, but campus 100Mb 
connection. Had the same issue with downloading the DVD iso images. At 
first the web link connected me to AU site, and it was going to take 14 hours 
estimate to download. Cancelled and went directly to mirror.kernel.org and 
got the image in about 30 minutes.

Anyone know of a way to get yum to use US sites rather than geographically 
close sites? Same with the web browsers connecting to sites.

Thanks.

+----------+
  Michael D. Setzer II -  Computer Science Instructor  
  Guam Community College  Computer Center  
  mailto:mi...@kuentos.guam.net
  mailto:msetze...@gmail.com
  http://www.guam.net/home/mikes
  Guam - Where America's Day Begins
  G4L Disk Imaging Project maintainer 
  http://sourceforge.net/projects/g4l/
+--+

http://setiathome.berkeley.edu (Original)
Number of Seti Units Returned:  19,471
Processing time:  32 years, 290 days, 12 hours, 58 minutes
(Total Hours: 287,489)

BOINC@HOME CREDITS
ROSETTA  9820488.011684   |   SETI17201975.116981
ABC 16611686.340441   |   EINSTEIN14962286.139852

-- 
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org


OT: Kernel USB message

2014-01-08 Thread Michael D. Setzer II
I have a project that I build using Fedora, but have just gotten some new 
machine with USB keyboards and mice, and am getting a message that pops 
up often. With Fedora it isn't a real issue, since it goes to the log, but with 
the 
project it displays on the text screen, and corrupts the dialog display.

The message seems to be linked to the Lenova Mouse, but not sure how to 
solve or supress the messages.

Message is:
usb 3-x: ep 0x81 - rounding interval to 64 microframes, ep desc says 80 
microframes

The message appears at random times, with no use of the mouse. Nothing 
for time, then sometimes 1 or a few will pop up.

The 3-x has the x value change depending on what USB port it is plugged 
into. For my project the kernels are build from kernel.org source, but the 
support is currently built from Fedora machines. 

Any ideals on ways to resolve the issue?

Searches find lots of results, but they are mainly long log listings that have 
the line somewhere in the listing.

Thanks.

+--+
  Michael D. Setzer II -  Computer Science Instructor  
  Guam Community College  Computer Center  
  mailto:mi...@kuentos.guam.net
  mailto:msetze...@gmail.com
  http://www.guam.net/home/mikes
  Guam - Where America's Day Begins
  G4L Disk Imaging Project maintainer 
  http://sourceforge.net/projects/g4l/
+--+

http://setiathome.berkeley.edu (Original)
Number of Seti Units Returned:  19,471
Processing time:  32 years, 290 days, 12 hours, 58 minutes
(Total Hours: 287,489)

BOINC@HOME CREDITS
ROSETTA  9837209.884483   |   SETI17208320.847877
ABC 16611686.340441   |   EINSTEIN14962286.139852

-- 
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org


ssh difference with Fedora 20

2014-01-11 Thread Michael D. Setzer II
Last week I got 21 new machines for my classroom to replace the 8 year old 
machine. Old machine had Fedora 17 with 1 having 18 and 1 with 19. That 
all worked well, but installed Fedora 20 on the new machines in addition to 
the Windows 7 the machine came with. Have run into 1 issue so far.

With Fedora 20, when I ssh into other machines using plink to run commands 
to do various things, it all works fine with one exception. If the command has 
a reboot option, it just sits there. The remote machine does reboot, but the 
connection doesn't close? End up having to kill the process to get it to go on 
to the next line of the script to do the next machine. 

With Redhat 9 thru 17, there was never a pause, it would go on to the next 
machines connection. With 18 or 19, it would display a message about the 
connection being closed, but would go on quickly. With Fedora 20 it is 
different. Machine running the script at moment is still 17, so it didn't 
change.

Tried using reboot, shutdown -r now, and systemctl options, and all have the 
same issue. 

Doing a simple command link ls, results in going from one machine to the 
next with no pauses. 


+--+
  Michael D. Setzer II -  Computer Science Instructor  
  Guam Community College  Computer Center  
  mailto:mi...@kuentos.guam.net
  mailto:msetze...@gmail.com
  http://www.guam.net/home/mikes
  Guam - Where America's Day Begins
  G4L Disk Imaging Project maintainer 
  http://sourceforge.net/projects/g4l/
+--+

http://setiathome.berkeley.edu (Original)
Number of Seti Units Returned:  19,471
Processing time:  32 years, 290 days, 12 hours, 58 minutes
(Total Hours: 287,489)

BOINC@HOME CREDITS
ROSETTA  9862789.474473   |   SETI17244147.477070
ABC 16613838.513356   |   EINSTEIN15021713.129852

-- 
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org


Re: ssh difference with Fedora 20

2014-01-12 Thread Michael D. Setzer II
On 12 Jan 2014 at 8:49, poma wrote:

Date sent:  Sun, 12 Jan 2014 08:49:40 +0100
From:   poma 
To: Community support for Fedora users 

Subject:Re: ssh difference with Fedora 20

> On 12.01.2014 07:50, Michael D. Setzer II wrote:
> 
> > With Fedora 20, when I ssh into other machines using plink to run
> > commands to do various things, it all works fine with one exception.
> > If the command has a reboot option, it just sits there. The remote
> > machine does reboot, but the connection doesn't close? End up having
> > to kill the process to get it to go on to the next line of the
> > script to do the next machine. 
> 
> $ time ssh πκεdπμ
> Last login: …
> $ systemctl reboot -i
>  AUTHENTICATING FOR
> org.freedesktop.login1.reboot-multiple-sessions === Authentication is
> required for rebooting the system while other users are logged in.
> Authenticating as: root Password:  AUTHENTICATION COMPLETE === $
> Connection to πκεdπμ closed by remote host. Connection to
> πκεdπμ closed.
> 
> real  0m7.727s
> user  0m0.070s
> sys   0m0.013s
> $
> 
> OpenSSH_6.4πἕν, OpenSSL 1.0.1e-fips 11 Feb 2013
> 
> 
> poma
> 

First, Thanks for the quick reply. I had done some additional testing, and it 
appears that it actually was rebooting as I had thought. The log shows it 
shuts down a bunch of things, but then just sits there, so the connection was 
actually ending.  Had a ping running to the machine in another window, and 
saw it did go down.

Now did the test with the following option. Was always connected with root 
user. 

plink -t 192.168.7.202 -l root -pw * "sync ; systemctl reboot -i "

The above did make the connection, and did actually cause a restart after 
about 40 seconds as show from the ping window, and then the pings came 
back after the reboot. Connecting to the machine, and checking uptime did 
show the machine reboot, but the plink command was still running? It didn't 
disconnect, so not clear on why that is? Would think a reboot would reset the 
connection?

Did a test using timelimit to cancel the job after 30 seconds, and that worked, 
but would be hard to calculate the amount of time required with tasks other 
than a reboot. Might be best to just do a separate script to reboot systems, 
and run the update processes without the reboot.

Again, Thanks. Didn't get the machines till Monday, so only had a week to 
get it all up and running. 



> 
> -- 
> users mailing list
> users@lists.fedoraproject.org
> To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
> https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
> Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
> Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have
> a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org


+--+
  Michael D. Setzer II -  Computer Science Instructor  
  Guam Community College  Computer Center  
  mailto:mi...@kuentos.guam.net
  mailto:msetze...@gmail.com
  http://www.guam.net/home/mikes
  Guam - Where America's Day Begins
  G4L Disk Imaging Project maintainer 
  http://sourceforge.net/projects/g4l/
+--+

http://setiathome.berkeley.edu (Original)
Number of Seti Units Returned:  19,471
Processing time:  32 years, 290 days, 12 hours, 58 minutes
(Total Hours: 287,489)

BOINC@HOME CREDITS
ROSETTA  9862789.474473   |   SETI17244147.477070
ABC 16613838.513356   |   EINSTEIN15021713.129852

-- 
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org


Re: ssh difference with Fedora 20

2014-01-13 Thread Michael D. Setzer II
On 13 Jan 2014 at 6:28, poma wrote:

Date sent:  Mon, 13 Jan 2014 06:28:42 +0100
From:   poma 
To: Community support for Fedora users 

Subject:Re: ssh difference with Fedora 20
Send reply to:  Community support for Fedora users 


<mailto:users-requ...@lists.fedoraproject.org?subject=unsubscribe>

<mailto:users-requ...@lists.fedoraproject.org?subject=subscribe>

> 
> Dropbear(dbclient) also works nicely,
> 
> $ time dbclient -i .dropbear/dropbear_priv -l poma raw
> Last login: …
> $ systemctl reboot -i
>  AUTHENTICATING FOR org.freedesktop.login1.reboot ===
> Authentication is required for rebooting the system.
> Authenticating as: poma
> Password:
>  AUTHENTICATION COMPLETE ===
> $
> real  0m4.773s
> user  0m0.024s
> sys   0m0.010s
> 

Thanks for the info, but am still getting various results. I want to automate 
the 
process since I generally use this to connect to the other 19 machines in the 
classroom, so the plink with the commands requires no typing on keyboard.

The issue I've seen is that sometimes it works fine, and sometimes it takes 1 
1/2 minutes or more to reboot, and on some cases it never reboots.  I have 
found on reference that mentions using sync ; then reboot with the -force 
option, and that always seems to work, but using a force option doesn't 
sound like the best method. The ideal was the sync would get stuff written.

Will have to do more testing.


> 
> poma
> 
> 
> -- 
> users mailing list
> users@lists.fedoraproject.org
> To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
> https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
> Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
> Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have
> a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org


+--+
  Michael D. Setzer II -  Computer Science Instructor  
  Guam Community College  Computer Center  
  mailto:mi...@kuentos.guam.net
  mailto:msetze...@gmail.com
  http://www.guam.net/home/mikes
  Guam - Where America's Day Begins
  G4L Disk Imaging Project maintainer 
  http://sourceforge.net/projects/g4l/
+--+

http://setiathome.berkeley.edu (Original)
Number of Seti Units Returned:  19,471
Processing time:  32 years, 290 days, 12 hours, 58 minutes
(Total Hours: 287,489)

BOINC@HOME CREDITS
ROSETTA  9894257.174270   |   SETI17280158.156095
ABC 16613838.513356   |   EINSTEIN15060552.839852

-- 
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org


Re: Naughty question: copy Windows XP under Fedora?

2014-01-20 Thread Michael D. Setzer II
On 20 Jan 2014 at 11:29, Timothy Murphy wrote:

To: users@lists.fedoraproject.org
From:   Timothy Murphy 
Subject:Naughty question: copy Windows XP under Fedora?
Date sent:  Mon, 20 Jan 2014 11:29:07 +0100
Organization:   Trinity College Dublin
Send reply to:  gayle...@eircom.net,

> I always keep a copy of Windows XP on my computers.
> I very rarely use them, but find that they are occasionally useful. In
> any case, with the upcoming death of XP I'm thinking of keeping a
> backup copy of my Windows partition on a USB stick or external hard
> disk.
> 
> I looked briefly for a method for this under Windows,
> but all the solutions I found seemed either absurdly complicated
> or else were linked to expensive programs which I certainly don't
> want.
> 
> It struck me that there is probably a simpler way of doing this under
> Linux, and I was wondering if someone not of a fanatical bent might
> help me.
> 

There are a number of options for doing a backup. I've been maintainer of 
the g4l project since 2004, and it has options for backing up linux, and other 
partitions. In my classroom, I have it setup to run as an option to restore the 
XP partition on old systems in about 12 minutes for the 40G partition using 
ntfsclone image. Just got new machines 2 weeks ago, and have them setup 
with Windows 7 and Fedora 20. The Grub menu now has an option to restore 
the 160G partition in about 9 1/2 minutes, but only has about 25G of space 
used, which makes the NTFSCLONE image better since it backs up just 
used space.  This wouldn't be a running version, but would be a backup of 
the data. Would also need to backup mbr with partition table to restore. There 
might also be options to run XP under Virtualbox or other options, or 
depending on the needs, usine WINE, dosbox, or dosemu. 



> -- 
> Timothy Murphy  
> e-mail: gayleard /at/ eircom.net
> School of Mathematics, Trinity College, Dublin 2, Ireland
> 
> 
> -- 
> users mailing list
> users@lists.fedoraproject.org
> To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
> https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
> Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
> Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have
> a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org


+--+
  Michael D. Setzer II -  Computer Science Instructor  
  Guam Community College  Computer Center  
  mailto:mi...@kuentos.guam.net
  mailto:msetze...@gmail.com
  http://www.guam.net/home/mikes
  Guam - Where America's Day Begins
  G4L Disk Imaging Project maintainer 
  http://sourceforge.net/projects/g4l/
+--+

http://setiathome.berkeley.edu (Original)
Number of Seti Units Returned:  19,471
Processing time:  32 years, 290 days, 12 hours, 58 minutes
(Total Hours: 287,489)

BOINC@HOME CREDITS
ROSETTA 10167349.112591   |   SETI17694336.630174
ABC 16613838.513356   |   EINSTEIN15500980.789852

-- 
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org


Re: Naughty question: copy Windows XP under Fedora?

2014-01-20 Thread Michael D. Setzer II
On 21 Jan 2014 at 2:17, Timothy Murphy wrote:

To: users@lists.fedoraproject.org
From:   Timothy Murphy 
Subject:Re: Naughty question: copy Windows XP under Fedora?
Date sent:  Tue, 21 Jan 2014 02:17:19 +0100
Organization:   Trinity College Dublin
Send reply to:  gayle...@eircom.net,
Community support for Fedora users 


<mailto:users-requ...@lists.fedoraproject.org?subject=unsubscribe>

<mailto:users-requ...@lists.fedoraproject.org?subject=subscribe>

> Michael D. Setzer II wrote:
> 
> >> I always keep a copy of Windows XP on my computers.
> >> I very rarely use them, but find that they are occasionally useful.
> >> In any case, with the upcoming death of XP I'm thinking of keeping
> >> a backup copy of my Windows partition on a USB stick or external
> >> hard disk.
> 
> > There are a number of options for doing a backup. I've been
> > maintainer of the g4l project since 2004, and it has options for
> > backing up linux, and other partitions.
> 
> Thanks for the info.
> I'll give it a try, though the documentation I saw was a bit sparse

Not sure what documentation you are looking at, but the doc file is 235 pages 
long?

http://sourceforge.net/projects/g4l/files/g4l%20documentation/g4l0.44-docum
entation.pdf/download

Main site is on sourceforge, and current released version is 0.45, and have 
been working on version 0.46 for some time with 83 alphas and just added 
kernel 3.13.0 as an option. 

http://sourceforge.net/projects/g4l/

Documentation contains a lot of source code and config files, and 
instructions for basic operations. Mostly uses dd with compress using lzop, 
gzip or bzip2. Along with ntfsclone options, and has fsarchiver also included, 
but I added it as an option at an users request, and have only used it a 
couple of times in testing. 

Would be happy to answer any questions.




> ...
> 
> -- 
> Timothy Murphy  
> e-mail: gayleard /at/ eircom.net
> School of Mathematics, Trinity College, Dublin 2, Ireland
> 
> 
> -- 
> users mailing list
> users@lists.fedoraproject.org
> To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
> https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
> Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
> Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have
> a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org


+--+
  Michael D. Setzer II -  Computer Science Instructor  
  Guam Community College  Computer Center  
  mailto:mi...@kuentos.guam.net
  mailto:msetze...@gmail.com
  http://www.guam.net/home/mikes
  Guam - Where America's Day Begins
  G4L Disk Imaging Project maintainer 
  http://sourceforge.net/projects/g4l/
+--+

http://setiathome.berkeley.edu (Original)
Number of Seti Units Returned:  19,471
Processing time:  32 years, 290 days, 12 hours, 58 minutes
(Total Hours: 287,489)

BOINC@HOME CREDITS
ROSETTA 10232648.847549   |   SETI17759588.837779
ABC 16613838.513356   |   EINSTEIN15547725.729852

-- 
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org


Clearing screen after selecting windows from grub?

2014-02-13 Thread Michael D. Setzer II
I just got 20 new machines in my classroom to replace the 8 year old 
machines, and added the Fedora 20 to the Windows 7 that the machines 
came with. I was able to figure how to the old graphic from previous versions 
to show up instead of the black screen with text only, and they is no issue 
with any kernel or non-windows options, but when selecting the windows 7 
boot option, the screen seems to show multiple copies of the original image 
of the verne.png file but not correctly set. It just sits there for some time, 
but 
then the windows does finally come up. Is there an option to have it clear the 
screen when the option is picked?

Thanks.

Another issue that I have run into is that I setup one machine, and then 
imaged them to the other machines. The the nic commands would not work 
because the hardcoded mac wasn't matching, so I had create a script to 
automatically modify the file in these 20 machines, but have also worked to 
get the script to work with other machines with various nics.

This script works, but doesn't automatically change the file since I want to 
make sure that it is correct before changing. I recall on previous versions 
that 
you could tell it not to link the mac to the nic, so it was no issue with 
imaging 
machines. Not a big deal, but found I couldn't use ifup or other commands 
since it would give errors that the mac wasn't matching.

cd /etc/sysconfig/network-scripts
nic=`ls  ifcfg* | grep -v \~ | grep -v lo | grep -v org | grep -v new`
nicname=`echo $nic | cut -b 7-12`
HW=`ifconfig $nicname | grep ether | cut -b 15-31 | tr [:lower:] [:upper:]`
clear
echo NIC $nic NICNAME $nicname HW $HW
sed -e "s/HWADDR=.*/HWADDR=\"$HW\"/g" $nic >$nic.new2
cat $nic | grep -v HWADDR >$nic.new
echo HWADDR=\"$HW\" >>$nic.new

Again Thanks.

+--------------+
  Michael D. Setzer II -  Computer Science Instructor  
  Guam Community College  Computer Center  
  mailto:mi...@kuentos.guam.net
  mailto:msetze...@gmail.com
  http://www.guam.net/home/mikes
  Guam - Where America's Day Begins
  G4L Disk Imaging Project maintainer 
  http://sourceforge.net/projects/g4l/
+--+

http://setiathome.berkeley.edu (Original)
Number of Seti Units Returned:  19,471
Processing time:  32 years, 290 days, 12 hours, 58 minutes
(Total Hours: 287,489)

BOINC@HOME CREDITS
ROSETTA 11217625.899429   |   SETI19279201.161505
ABC 16613838.513356   |   EINSTEIN17148625.741651

-- 
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org


  1   2   3   4   5   6   7   >