Re: GGoogle chat vs Skype
Hi Guys, This is well worth looking at, it was GNU SIP Communicator :- http://jitsi.org/ It supports lots of formats, including Facebook, Google and Skype I believe. Aaron -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
Re: GGoogle chat vs Skype
On 27 September 2011 18:30, Marko Vojinovic wrote: > On Tue, Sep 27, 2011 at 4:16 PM, Aaron Gray > wrote: > > This is well worth looking at, it was GNU SIP Communicator :- > > http://jitsi.org/ > > It supports lots of formats, including Facebook, Google and Skype I > believe. > > Somehow I doubt Skype is supported. ;-) > support for Skype’s SILK wideband codec Aaron -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
MySQL not working with PHP
I have an F11 system. I have several PHP apps that use MySQL including MediaWiki but they are failing to work giving error 500 phpinfo() is working and showing MySQL. When I try to connect to it I get the following error :- Can't connect to local MySQL server through socket '/var/lib/mysql/mysql.sock' (13) Have have done a 'service mysqld start' and the 'mysql' command line looks fine. Many thanks in advance, Aaron -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
Re: MySQL not working with PHP
On 11 September 2010 22:04, David A. Paredes Rios wrote: > Please can you provide more info? IT was working before? php and mysql > versions, packages installed? when mysql stops working with php? after any > update? > > It was a fresh installed machine that has been a dormant rsync'ed mirrored machine. Unfortunately I am not sure it ever worked. PHP Version 5.2.13 *mysql-5.1.37-1.fc11.i586* * php-mysql-5.2.13-1.fc11.i586 * Aaron > Thanks > On Sat, Sep 11, 2010 at 2:38 PM, Aaron Gray wrote: > >> I have an F11 system. >> >> I have several PHP apps that use MySQL including MediaWiki but they are >> failing to work giving error 500 >> >> phpinfo() is working and showing MySQL. >> >> When I try to connect to it I get the following error :- >> >> Can't connect to local MySQL server through socket >> '/var/lib/mysql/mysql.sock' (13) >> >> Have have done a 'service mysqld start' and the 'mysql' command line looks >> fine. >> >> Many thanks in advance, >> >> Aaron >> >> -- >> users mailing list >> users@lists.fedoraproject.org >> To unsubscribe or change subscription options: >> https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users >> Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines >> >> > > > -- > - > David A. Paredes R. > > -- > users mailing list > users@lists.fedoraproject.org > To unsubscribe or change subscription options: > https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users > Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines > > -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
Re: MySQL not working with PHP
On 12 September 2010 16:09, Mike Wright wrote: > Aaron Gray wrote: > > I have an F11 system. > > > > I have several PHP apps that use MySQL including MediaWiki but they are > > failing to work giving error 500 > > > > phpinfo() is working and showing MySQL. > > > > When I try to connect to it I get the following error :- > > > > Can't connect to local MySQL server through socket > > '/var/lib/mysql/mysql.sock' (13) > > I had a similar issue with f10. In previous releases mysql.sock was > indeed located in /var/lib/mysql but in f10 it had moved to /tmp. I had > to edit /etc/my.cnf to change the socket setting. > > Does not look like that is the case. Aaron -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
/etc/init.d/mysqld not installed on F12 machine
I don't seem to be having any luck with Fedora and MySQL on multiple machines at the moment. MySQL does not seem to be installed on my F12 machine. I have done a :- yum install mysql but /etc/init.d/mysqld and friends are not installed. Is there a separate package that installs them ? Help, Aaron -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
Re: /etc/init.d/mysqld not installed on F12 machine
On 12 September 2010 21:15, Sam Sharpe wrote: > On 12 September 2010 21:06, Aaron Gray wrote: > > MySQL does not seem to be installed on my F12 machine. > > I have done a :- > >yum install mysql > > but /etc/init.d/mysqld and friends are not installed. > > Is there a separate package that installs them ? > > mysql-server I believe. > > Yep, got it thanks, Aaron -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
Re: MySQL not working with PHP
On 12 September 2010 17:15, Aaron Gray wrote: > On 12 September 2010 16:09, Mike Wright wrote: > >> Aaron Gray wrote: >> > I have an F11 system. >> > >> > I have several PHP apps that use MySQL including MediaWiki but they are >> > failing to work giving error 500 >> > >> > phpinfo() is working and showing MySQL. >> > >> > When I try to connect to it I get the following error :- >> > >> > Can't connect to local MySQL server through socket >> > '/var/lib/mysql/mysql.sock' (13) >> >> I had a similar issue with f10. In previous releases mysql.sock was >> indeed located in /var/lib/mysql but in f10 it had moved to /tmp. I had >> to edit /etc/my.cnf to change the socket setting. >> >> > Does not look like that is the case. > Reinstalling 'mysql-server' did the job :) Aaron -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
F13 DNS (client) not working
Hi, I have just installed F13 server and the DNS is not working. I can ping out but am not getting google. On filling in the Network Configuration DNS tab then restarting Network Configure the DNS values have disappeared and are blank. Hope you can help. Many thanks in advance, Aaron -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
F13 DNS (client) not working
Hi, I have just installed F13 server and the DNS is not working. I can ping out but am not getting google. On filling in the Network Configuration DNS tab then restarting Network Configure the DNS values have disappeared and are blank. Hope you can help. Many thanks in advance, Aaron -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
Re: F13 DNS (client) not working
Its not the router, or the firewall or the local firewall. On 1 October 2010 22:17, Scott Ford wrote: > Aaron: > > How is your Fedora configured. I have mine going thry Virtualbox thru > Windows 7 no problem to a router > What are you connected to ( Hardware) > > Scott Ford > Senior Systems Engineer > > *[mobile]* 609-346-0399 > *[direct]* 678-266-3399 x304 > > identityforge.com http://identityforge.com > > This message is for the designated recipient only and may contain > privileged, proprietary, or otherwise private information. If you have > received it in error, please notify the sender immediately or let us know > at idfi...@identityforge.com , and then delete the original. Any other use > of his email by you is prohibited. > > > > > -- > *From:* users-boun...@lists.fedoraproject.org [mailto: > users-boun...@lists.fedoraproject.org] *On Behalf Of *Aaron Gray > *Sent:* Friday, October 01, 2010 5:16 PM > *To:* Community support for Fedora users > *Subject:* F13 DNS (client) not working > > Hi, > > I have just installed F13 server and the DNS is not working. I can ping out > but am not getting google. > > On filling in the Network Configuration DNS tab then restarting Network > Configure the DNS values have disappeared and are blank. > > Hope you can help. Many thanks in advance, > > Aaron > > > -- > users mailing list > users@lists.fedoraproject.org > To unsubscribe or change subscription options: > https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users > Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines > > <>-- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
Re: F13 DNS (client) not working
On 1 October 2010 22:39, Scott Ford wrote: > Aaron: > > Ok, but is your address via DHCP or Static ? > Static > Can you 'ping' Fedora from the Router ? > Yes > Can you 'ping' the router from Fedora ? > Yes I have an existing parallel F11 server that is fine and online. > > Also what do you see if you do a IFCONFIG eth0 > > Scott Ford > Senior Systems Engineer > > *[mobile]* 609-346-0399 > *[direct]* 678-266-3399 x304 > > identityforge.com http://identityforge.com > > This message is for the designated recipient only and may contain > privileged, proprietary, or otherwise private information. If you have > received it in error, please notify the sender immediately or let us know > at idfi...@identityforge.com , and then delete the original. Any other use > of his email by you is prohibited. > > > > > -- > *From:* users-boun...@lists.fedoraproject.org [mailto: > users-boun...@lists.fedoraproject.org] *On Behalf Of *Aaron Gray > *Sent:* Friday, October 01, 2010 5:25 PM > > *To:* Community support for Fedora users > *Subject:* Re: F13 DNS (client) not working > > Its not the router, or the firewall or the local firewall. > > On 1 October 2010 22:17, Scott Ford wrote: > >> Aaron: >> >> How is your Fedora configured. I have mine going thry Virtualbox thru >> Windows 7 no problem to a router >> What are you connected to ( Hardware) >> >> Scott Ford >> Senior Systems Engineer >> >> *[mobile]* 609-346-0399 >> *[direct]* 678-266-3399 x304 >> >> identityforge.com http://identityforge.com >> >> This message is for the designated recipient only and may contain >> privileged, proprietary, or otherwise private information. If you have >> received it in error, please notify the sender immediately or let us know >> at idfi...@identityforge.com , and then delete the original. Any other >> use of his email by you is prohibited. >> >> >> >> >> -- >> *From:* users-boun...@lists.fedoraproject.org [mailto: >> users-boun...@lists.fedoraproject.org] *On Behalf Of *Aaron Gray >> *Sent:* Friday, October 01, 2010 5:16 PM >> *To:* Community support for Fedora users >> *Subject:* F13 DNS (client) not working >> >> Hi, >> >> I have just installed F13 server and the DNS is not working. I can ping >> out but am not getting google. >> >> On filling in the Network Configuration DNS tab then restarting Network >> Configure the DNS values have disappeared and are blank. >> >> Hope you can help. Many thanks in advance, >> >> Aaron >> >> >> -- >> users mailing list >> users@lists.fedoraproject.org >> To unsubscribe or change subscription options: >> https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users >> Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines >> >> > > -- > users mailing list > users@lists.fedoraproject.org > To unsubscribe or change subscription options: > https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users > Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines > > <><>-- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
Re: F13 DNS (client) not working
On 1 October 2010 23:00, JD wrote: > > > On 10/01/2010 02:42 PM, Aaron Gray wrote: > > On 1 October 2010 22:39, Scott Ford > <mailto:scott.f...@identityforge.com>> wrote: > > > > Aaron: > > Ok, but is your address via DHCP or Static ? > > > > > > Static > Since you have a static IP address, then > you need to populate /etc/resolv.conf. > Personally, I have always done that by hand > as I have no faith in the net tools. > Can you populate you resolv.conf manually > and see if that works? > > I have done that but as soon as I do a "service network restart" it is blanked again. > > > Can you 'ping' Fedora from the Router ? > > > > > > Yes > > > > Can you 'ping' the router from Fedora ? > > > > > > Yes > > > > I have an existing parallel F11 server that is fine and online. > > > > Also what do you see if you do a IFCONFIG eth0 > > Scott Ford > > Senior Systems Engineer > > *[mobile]* 609-346-0399 > > *[direct]* 678-266-3399 x304 > > identityforge.com <http://identityforge.com> > > http://identityforge.com <http://identityforge.com/> > > This message is for the designated recipient only and may contain > > privileged, proprietary, or otherwise private information. If you > > have received it in error, please notify the sender immediately or > > let us know at idfi...@identityforge.com > > <mailto:idfi...@identityforge.com> , and then delete the original. > > Any other use of his email by you is prohibited. > > > > > ---- > > *From:* users-boun...@lists.fedoraproject.org > > <mailto:users-boun...@lists.fedoraproject.org> > > [mailto:users-boun...@lists.fedoraproject.org > > <mailto:users-boun...@lists.fedoraproject.org>] *On Behalf Of > > *Aaron Gray > > *Sent:* Friday, October 01, 2010 5:25 PM > > > > *To:* Community support for Fedora users > > *Subject:* Re: F13 DNS (client) not working > > > > Its not the router, or the firewall or the local firewall. > > > > On 1 October 2010 22:17, Scott Ford > <mailto:scott.f...@identityforge.com>> wrote: > > > > Aaron: > > How is your Fedora configured. I have mine going thry > > Virtualbox thru Windows 7 no problem to a router > > What are you connected to ( Hardware) > > Scott Ford > > Senior Systems Engineer > > *[mobile]* 609-346-0399 > > *[direct]* 678-266-3399 x304 > > identityforge.com <http://identityforge.com> > > http://identityforge.com <http://identityforge.com/> > > This message is for the designated recipient only and may > > contain privileged, proprietary, or otherwise private > > information. If you have received it in error, please notify > > the sender immediately or let us know at > > idfi...@identityforge.com <mailto:idfi...@identityforge.com> , > > and then delete the original. Any other use of his email by > > you is prohibited. > > > > > > > *From:* users-boun...@lists.fedoraproject.org > > <mailto:users-boun...@lists.fedoraproject.org> > > [mailto:users-boun...@lists.fedoraproject.org > > <mailto:users-boun...@lists.fedoraproject.org>] *On Behalf Of > > *Aaron Gray > > *Sent:* Friday, October 01, 2010 5:16 PM > > *To:* Community support for Fedora users > > *Subject:* F13 DNS (client) not working > > > > Hi, > > > > I have just installed F13 server and the DNS is not working. I > > can ping out but am not getting google. > > > > On filling in the Network Configuration DNS tab then > > restarting Network Configure the DNS values have disappeared > > and are blank. > > > > Hope you can help. Many thanks in advance, > > > > Aaron > > > > > > -- > > users mailing list > > users@lists.fedoraproject.org > > <mailto:users@lists.fedoraproject.org> > > To unsubscribe or change subscription options: > > https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users > >
Re: F13 DNS (client) not working
On 1 October 2010 23:10, Aaron Gray wrote: > > > On 1 October 2010 23:00, JD wrote: > >> >> >> On 10/01/2010 02:42 PM, Aaron Gray wrote: >> > On 1 October 2010 22:39, Scott Ford > > <mailto:scott.f...@identityforge.com>> wrote: >> > >> > Aaron: >> > Ok, but is your address via DHCP or Static ? >> > >> > >> > Static >> Since you have a static IP address, then >> you need to populate /etc/resolv.conf. >> Personally, I have always done that by hand >> as I have no faith in the net tools. >> Can you populate you resolv.conf manually >> and see if that works? >> >> I have done that but as soon as I do a "service network restart" it is > blanked again. > Its telling me in a comment in /etc/resolv.conf to put it in :- ifcfg files in /etc/sysconfig/network-scripts -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
Re: F13 DNS (client) not working
On 2 October 2010 05:28, Genes MailLists wrote: > On 10/01/2010 06:20 PM, Aaron Gray wrote: > > > > > > # chkconfig --list NetworkManager > > > NetworkManager 0:off 1:off 2:on3:on4:on5:on6:off > > > > > > # chkconfig --list network > > > network 0:off 1:off 2:off 3:off 4:off 5:off 6:off > > > > > > > Well your original mail said you were using network service but in > fact network is off and NetworkManager is on. If you're really using > network then you need to turn it on and turn off NetworkManager. > > If you're using NetworkManager then you're not setting it up right. > > If you are using network - as your mail suggests then please: > > chkconfig NetworkManager off > chkconfig network on > service NetworkManager stop > (fix your settings) and then > service network start >(or restart) > > I did not know they were mutually exclusive. AFAICT on existing and previous Fedora Servers I have just used network AFAICT. Nayway this does not work either...going back to F11... Aaron -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
Re: F13 DNS (client) not working
On 2 October 2010 15:42, Genes MailLists wrote: > On 10/02/2010 09:23 AM, Tim wrote: > > > > > I would try: Stop the network service. Edit the configuration files. > > Start the network service. > > > > If you're modifying the files while the service is running, it could be > > reverting to backups when stopping/restarting. > > > > > > Looking over what he did - it seems he used network manager to config > the connection (or at least edited the ifcfg files which NM owns) .. > then changed them and started network service on top - so both network > services are now competing which is a right old mess. > > He chose to revert to f11 instead of just turning off NM for some > reason ... > > I think he should have turned off NM and gone about his merry way .. > > But its not my machine! > > Going back to F11 for now seemed better :) Aaron -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
software RAID info
Hi, How do I interrogate the software RAID system, to get info like RAID type and sizes. Many thanks in advance, Aaron -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
Re: software RAID info
On 2 October 2010 17:44, Aaron Gray wrote: > Hi, > > How do I interrogate the software RAID system, to get info like RAID type > and sizes. > > Got it :- cat /proc/mdstat Aaron -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
Re: software RAID info
On 2 October 2010 17:55, Greg Woods wrote: > On Sat, 2010-10-02 at 17:44 +0100, Aaron Gray wrote: > > Hi, > > > > > > How do I interrogate the software RAID system, to get info like RAID > > type and sizes. > > # cat /proc/mdstat > > # man mdadm > > Thanks, Aaron -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
VSFTPD 421 Service not availabl
I have installed a fresh version of F11, unfortunately I did not install VSFTPD with it. On doing a "yum install vsftpd" it install fine but does not seem to function. [r...@zzz vsftpd]# ftp localhost Trying ::1... ftp: connect to address ::1Connection refused Trying 127.0.0.1... Connected to localhost (127.0.0.1). 421 Service not available, remote server has closed connection ftp> quit I copied the 'vsftpd.conf' and 'users' directory from my working F11 server this one is supposed to be mirroring, but am getting exactly the same responce. Help, Aaron -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
Re: VSFTPD 421 Service not availabl
On 2 October 2010 23:46, Gregory Woodbury wrote: > > > On Sat, Oct 2, 2010 at 6:37 PM, Aaron Gray wrote: > >> I have installed a fresh version of F11, unfortunately I did not install >> VSFTPD with it. >> >> On doing a "yum install vsftpd" it install fine but does not seem to >> function. >> >> [r...@zzz vsftpd]# ftp localhost >> Trying ::1... >> ftp: connect to address ::1Connection refused >> Trying 127.0.0.1... >> Connected to localhost (127.0.0.1). >> 421 Service not available, remote server has closed connection >> ftp> quit >> >> I copied the 'vsftpd.conf' and 'users' directory from my working F11 >> server this one is supposed to be mirroring, but am getting exactly the same >> responce. >> > > su -c /sbin/chkconfig vsftpd on > su -c /sbin/service vsftpd start > Still getting a 421 :( Aaron -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
Re: VSFTPD 421 Service not availabl
On 2 October 2010 23:56, stan wrote: > On Sat, 2 Oct 2010 23:37:40 +0100 > Aaron Gray wrote: > > > I have installed a fresh version of F11, unfortunately I did not > > install VSFTPD with it. > > > > On doing a "yum install vsftpd" it install fine but does not seem to > > function. > > > > [r...@zzz vsftpd]# ftp localhost > > Trying ::1... > > ftp: connect to address ::1Connection refused > > Trying 127.0.0.1... > > Connected to localhost (127.0.0.1). > > 421 Service not available, remote server has closed connection > > ftp> quit > > > > I copied the 'vsftpd.conf' and 'users' directory from my working F11 > > server this one is supposed to be mirroring, but am getting exactly > > the same responce. > > This is probably a problem with the firewall. Did you open ports 20 > and 21? > > And if you are using passive ftp you should open some ports in the high > range, so there is a hole in the firewall for vsftpd to use. You have > to tell vsftpd to use those ports in the configuration. I also had to > open the service on my router, but that might not be an issue for you. > > If I recall correctly, there is a logging function that can be turned > on and it is really useful for decoding where the problem is and what > it is too. > > It's been a few years since I used vsftpd, so this is somewhat hazy. > My other F11 server is working fine, and that does not have any extras. Aaron -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
Re: VSFTPD 421 Service not availabl
On 2 October 2010 23:58, Aaron Gray wrote: > On 2 October 2010 23:56, stan wrote: > >> On Sat, 2 Oct 2010 23:37:40 +0100 >> Aaron Gray wrote: >> >> > I have installed a fresh version of F11, unfortunately I did not >> > install VSFTPD with it. >> > >> > On doing a "yum install vsftpd" it install fine but does not seem to >> > function. >> > >> > [r...@zzz vsftpd]# ftp localhost >> > Trying ::1... >> > ftp: connect to address ::1Connection refused >> > Trying 127.0.0.1... >> > Connected to localhost (127.0.0.1). >> > 421 Service not available, remote server has closed connection >> > ftp> quit >> > >> > I copied the 'vsftpd.conf' and 'users' directory from my working F11 >> > server this one is supposed to be mirroring, but am getting exactly >> > the same responce. >> >> This is probably a problem with the firewall. Did you open ports 20 >> and 21? >> >> And if you are using passive ftp you should open some ports in the high >> range, so there is a hole in the firewall for vsftpd to use. You have >> to tell vsftpd to use those ports in the configuration. I also had to >> open the service on my router, but that might not be an issue for you. >> >> If I recall correctly, there is a logging function that can be turned >> on and it is really useful for decoding where the problem is and what >> it is too. >> >> It's been a few years since I used vsftpd, so this is somewhat hazy. >> > > My other F11 server is working fine, and that does not have any extras. > > Its not iptables, thats exactly the same across the two machines. Aaron -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
Re: VSFTPD 421 Service not availabl
On 3 October 2010 01:35, Sam Sharpe wrote: > On 3 October 2010 00:41, Aaron Gray wrote: > > On 2 October 2010 23:58, Aaron Gray wrote: > >> > >> On 2 October 2010 23:56, stan wrote: > >>> > >>> On Sat, 2 Oct 2010 23:37:40 +0100 > >>> Aaron Gray wrote: > >>> > >>> > I have installed a fresh version of F11, unfortunately I did not > >>> > install VSFTPD with it. > >>> > > >>> > On doing a "yum install vsftpd" it install fine but does not seem to > >>> > function. > >>> > > >>> > [r...@zzz vsftpd]# ftp localhost > >>> > Trying ::1... > >>> > ftp: connect to address ::1Connection refused > >>> > Trying 127.0.0.1... > >>> > Connected to localhost (127.0.0.1). > >>> > 421 Service not available, remote server has closed connection > >>> > ftp> quit > >>> > > >>> > I copied the 'vsftpd.conf' and 'users' directory from my working F11 > >>> > server this one is supposed to be mirroring, but am getting exactly > >>> > the same responce. > >>> > >>> This is probably a problem with the firewall. Did you open ports 20 > >>> and 21? > >>> > >>> And if you are using passive ftp you should open some ports in the high > >>> range, so there is a hole in the firewall for vsftpd to use. You have > >>> to tell vsftpd to use those ports in the configuration. I also had to > >>> open the service on my router, but that might not be an issue for you. > >>> > >>> If I recall correctly, there is a logging function that can be turned > >>> on and it is really useful for decoding where the problem is and what > >>> it is too. > >>> > >>> It's been a few years since I used vsftpd, so this is somewhat hazy. > >> > >> My other F11 server is working fine, and that does not have any extras. > > > > Its not iptables, thats exactly the same across the two machines. > > Aaron > > I find the best way to deal with this kind of problem is some > elementary research. I started with Google: > > http://www.google.com/search?sourceid=navclient&hl=en-GB&q=vsftpd+421 > > The first Search Result might help you immensely. > Yep its SELinux ! Are there any rule files for this I can just load ? Aaron -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
Re: VSFTPD 421 Service not availabl
On 3 October 2010 11:21, Daniel J Walsh wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> On 10/02/2010 10:28 PM, Aaron Gray wrote:
> > On 3 October 2010 01:35, Sam Sharpe wrote:
> >
> >> On 3 October 2010 00:41, Aaron Gray wrote:
> >>> On 2 October 2010 23:58, Aaron Gray
> wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>> On 2 October 2010 23:56, stan wrote:
> >>>>>
> >>>>> On Sat, 2 Oct 2010 23:37:40 +0100
> >>>>> Aaron Gray wrote:
> >>>>>
> >>>>>> I have installed a fresh version of F11, unfortunately I did not
> >>>>>> install VSFTPD with it.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> On doing a "yum install vsftpd" it install fine but does not seem to
> >>>>>> function.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> [r...@zzz vsftpd]# ftp localhost
> >>>>>> Trying ::1...
> >>>>>> ftp: connect to address ::1Connection refused
> >>>>>> Trying 127.0.0.1...
> >>>>>> Connected to localhost (127.0.0.1).
> >>>>>> 421 Service not available, remote server has closed connection
> >>>>>> ftp> quit
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> I copied the 'vsftpd.conf' and 'users' directory from my working F11
> >>>>>> server this one is supposed to be mirroring, but am getting exactly
> >>>>>> the same responce.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> This is probably a problem with the firewall. Did you open ports 20
> >>>>> and 21?
> >>>>>
> >>>>> And if you are using passive ftp you should open some ports in the
> high
> >>>>> range, so there is a hole in the firewall for vsftpd to use. You
> have
> >>>>> to tell vsftpd to use those ports in the configuration. I also had
> to
> >>>>> open the service on my router, but that might not be an issue for
> you.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> If I recall correctly, there is a logging function that can be turned
> >>>>> on and it is really useful for decoding where the problem is and what
> >>>>> it is too.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> It's been a few years since I used vsftpd, so this is somewhat hazy.
> >>>>
> >>>> My other F11 server is working fine, and that does not have any
> extras.
> >>>
> >>> Its not iptables, thats exactly the same across the two machines.
> >>> Aaron
> >>
> >> I find the best way to deal with this kind of problem is some
> >> elementary research. I started with Google:
> >>
> >> http://www.google.com/search?sourceid=navclient&hl=en-GB&q=vsftpd+421
> >>
> >> The first Search Result might help you immensely.
> >>
> >
> > Yep its SELinux !
> >
> > Are there any rule files for this I can just load ?
> >
> > Aaron
> >
> >
> What AVC messages are you getting in /var/log/audit/audit.log?
>
type=AVC msg=audit(1286119627.313:21309): avc: denied { sys_admin } for
pid=1903 comm="vsftpd" capability=21
scontext=unconfined_u:system_r:ftpd_t:s0
tcontext=unconfined_u:system_r:ftpd_t:s0 tclass=capability
type=SYSCALL msg=audit(1286119627.313:21309): arch=4003 syscall=120
success=no exit=-1 a0=2811 a1=0 a2=6f4334 a3=6f4334 items=0 ppid=1
pid=1903 auid=0 uid=0 gid=0 euid=0 suid=0 fsuid=0 egid=0 sgid=0 fsgid=0
tty=(none) ses=5 comm="vsftpd" exe="/usr/sbin/vsftpd"
subj=unconfined_u:system_r:ftpd_t:s0 key=(null)
Yeah, it works when I turn enforcement off.
Aaron
--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
3D Chess screen saver
I am looking for an old screensaver that I believe was OpenGL on Fedora that was a chess board. Many thanks in advance, Aaron -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
Re: 3D Chess screen saver
On 9 March 2011 18:51, Frank Cox wrote: > On Wed, 09 Mar 2011 18:43:02 + > Aaron Gray wrote: > > > I am looking for an old screensaver that I believe was OpenGL on Fedora > that > > was a chess board. > > queens > > comes with xscreensaver-gl-extras > > Okay but I remember a full chess set, but could be wrong ? Thanks, Aaron -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
Re: 3D Chess screen saver
On 9 March 2011 22:47, Robert Nichols wrote: > On 03/09/2011 01:11 PM, Aaron Gray wrote: > > On 9 March 2011 18:51, Frank Cox > <mailto:thea...@sasktel.net>> wrote: > > > > On Wed, 09 Mar 2011 18:43:02 + > > Aaron Gray wrote: > > > > > I am looking for an old screensaver that I believe was OpenGL on > > Fedora that > > > was a chess board. > > > > queens > > > > comes with xscreensaver-gl-extras > > > > > > Okay but I remember a full chess set, but could be wrong ? > > That would be "endgame", also in xscreensaver-gl-extras. > > Yes, found it, thats the one, thanks ! Aaron -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
Fedora on HP ProLiant DL140 G3 Dual Core Xeon 2.33Ghz SATA Server
I am looking at buying a HP ProLiant DL140 G3 and am wondering what the support on Fedora for this is like. Does latest or still supported Fedora support this hardware ? If so are there video drivers ? I found some forum which says it has Matrox G200 video driver. Many thanks in advance, Aaron -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
PXE instillation of Fedora
Since these HP ProLiant DL150's dont have CD's, I need to do a PXE instillation from another Fedora box. Does anyone have a link to proper instructions on how to do this. I have looked at quite a few instructions but non that outline the Fedora files necessary to be put under /tftpboot on the server. Also it says on the ProLiant documentation that you only need tfpd and bootp and not full DHCP ? Any advice welcome, particularly if you have done a PXE instillation of Fedora. Many thanks in advance, Aaron -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
Re: PXE instillation of Fedora
On 14 March 2011 01:47, Mark LaPierre wrote: > On 03/13/2011 09:36 PM, Aaron Gray wrote: > > Since these HP ProLiant DL150's dont have CD's, I need to do a PXE > > instillation from another Fedora box. > > > > Does anyone have a link to proper instructions on how to do this. I have > > looked at quite a few instructions but non that outline the Fedora files > > necessary to be put under /tftpboot on the server. > > > > Also it says on the ProLiant documentation that you only need tfpd and > > bootp and not full DHCP ? > > > > Any advice welcome, particularly if you have done a PXE instillation of > > Fedora. > > > > Many thanks in advance, > > > > Aaron > > > Hey Aaron, > > You might not have to use PXE to do a remote install. > > I used to mount a copy of the install .iso file using loopback and then > share it out using NFS. Then all you need to do is boot up the target > system with a network install image, on a USB key, floppy disk, etc... > > When the installer asks for the location of the install media give it > the network address of the .iso image on the NFS server. > > I had several different distributions set up on my FTP server. My > friend would come over and plug into my network and install whatever > flavor he wanted on his laptop that lacked a CD/DVD drive the same way > you have no drive. > Ah right, if the ProLiant has DL140 has a USB drive option then that will be great, many thanks, Aaron >°v° > /(_)\ >^ ^ Mark LaPierre > Registerd Linux user No #267004 > www.counter.li.org > > In a free world without fences, who needs gates. > ** > Help Microsoft stamp out piracy - give Linux to a friend today. > ** > To mess up a Linux box, you need to work at it. > To mess up an MS Windows box, you just need to *look* at it. > ** > learn linux: > 'Rute User's Tutorial and Exposition' http://rute.2038bug.com/index.html > 'The Linux Documentation Project' http://www.tldp.org/ > 'LDP HOWTO-index' http://www.tldp.org/HOWTO/HOWTO-INDEX/index.html > 'HowtoForge' http://howtoforge.com/ > > -- > Signature shamelessly copied from: > Jatin Khatri & geleem > -- > users mailing list > users@lists.fedoraproject.org > To unsubscribe or change subscription options: > https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users > Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines > -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
Re: PXE instillation of Fedora
On 14 March 2011 01:41, Digimer wrote: > On 03/13/2011 09:36 PM, Aaron Gray wrote: > > Since these HP ProLiant DL150's dont have CD's, I need to do a PXE > > instillation from another Fedora box. > > > > Does anyone have a link to proper instructions on how to do this. I have > > looked at quite a few instructions but non that outline the Fedora files > > necessary to be put under /tftpboot on the server. > > > > Also it says on the ProLiant documentation that you only need tfpd and > > bootp and not full DHCP ? > > > > Any advice welcome, particularly if you have done a PXE instillation of > > Fedora. > > > > Many thanks in advance, > > > > Aaron > > > > I wrote this a little while back, maybe it will help you? > > http://wiki.alteeve.com/index.php/Setting_Up_a_PXE_Server_in_Fedora > > Thanks, looks quite complicated but not too much to handle, Aaron -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
Re: Fedora on HP ProLiant DL140 G3 Dual Core Xeon 2.33Ghz SATA Server
On 13 March 2011 14:17, Aaron Gray wrote: > I am looking at buying a HP ProLiant DL140 G3 and am wondering what the > support on Fedora for this is like. > > Does latest or still supported Fedora support this hardware ? > I am wondering due to the lack of replies whether servers tend to be supported by RHEL rather than Fedora, same for suse. Aaron -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
Re: Fedora on HP ProLiant DL140 G3 Dual Core Xeon 2.33Ghz SATA Server
On 15 March 2011 14:35, Michael Cronenworth wrote: > Aaron Gray wrote: > > I am wondering due to the lack of replies whether servers tend to be > > supported by RHEL rather than Fedora, same for suse. > > I can tell you off-hand that your server (and video chip) would work > fine with Fedora 14, but if you are putting this server into a mission > critical environment then you should go with RHEL 6. What about the SATA driver ? Its not really mission critical, I have been running two mirrored old Fujitsu-Siemens servers for over five years now and thought it about time to get something new :) Thanks, Aaron > -- > users mailing list > users@lists.fedoraproject.org > To unsubscribe or change subscription options: > https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users > Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines > -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
Re: Fedora on HP ProLiant DL140 G3 Dual Core Xeon 2.33Ghz SATA Server
On 15 March 2011 15:04, Michael Cronenworth wrote: > Aaron Gray on 03/15/2011 09:46 AM wrote: > >> What about the SATA driver ? >> > > Since the hardware is several years old I don't see why it wouldn't be > supported. I don't own the hardware so I can't guarantee you anything. > > If this gives you any peace of mind: My $DAYJOB uses brand new ML350 > servers on SuSE 10 (2.6.16 kernel), RHEL5 (2.6.18), and RHEL6 (2.6.32) and > they work fine. > Thanks, Aaron -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
Getting command line to do 'modprobe' on Fedora install
I need to get to the command line to do a 'modprobe DAC960' on installing Fedora. Is this possible ? Many thanks in advance, Aaron -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
Re: Getting command line to do 'modprobe' on Fedora install
On 29 March 2011 20:14, Michael Cronenworth wrote: > Aaron Gray wrote: > > I need to get to the command line to do a 'modprobe DAC960' on > > installing Fedora. > > > > Is this possible ? > > Is the Fedora installer not allowing you to install to hard drives > located on your RAID card? > FC4 was working. post FC4 is not. > If that is the case, I'm afraid Linux (the kernel, not Fedora) does not > support your RAID card. A quick Google shows the last driver was > compatible with the 2.4 Linux kernel. Fedora 14 uses the 2.6 kernel line. > FC4 was 2.6.11, looks like it may have been jettisoned later. > Manually running modprobe will not work as there is no "dac960" kernel > module for the 2.6 kernel and hardware detection is automatic these days > (versus 2.2/2.4 kernels). > Right. How does the HW detection work now ? Thanks, Aaron -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
Re: Getting command line to do 'modprobe' on Fedora install
On 29 March 2011 21:07, Michael Cronenworth wrote: > JB wrote: > > Are you sure ? > > $ uname -r > > 2.6.35.11-83.fc14.i686 > > $ grep -i DAC960 /boot/config-2.6.35.11-83.fc14.i686 > > CONFIG_BLK_DEV_DAC960=m > > $ grep -i DAC960 /lib/modules/2.6.35.11-83.fc14.i686/modules.dep > > kernel/drivers/block/DAC960.ko: > > > > I'm wrong then, the module still exists. I am too used to modules being > lower case that I didn't perform an case-insensitive search. > Yes, Anaconda used to detect and load the DAC960 driver on FC4, but post FC4 Kudzu but does not seem to support DAC960 detection any more. > Aaron, you should try a LiveCD or USB image and try to modprobe your > module. The Disk Utility (palimpset) should display your card at that > point. Okay, that maybe a work around, thanks, Aaron -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
Re: Getting command line to do 'modprobe' on Fedora install
On 29 March 2011 20:57, JB wrote: > Michael Cronenworth cchtml.com> writes: > > > ... > > If that is the case, I'm afraid Linux (the kernel, not Fedora) does not > > support your RAID card. A quick Google shows the last driver was > > compatible with the 2.4 Linux kernel. Fedora 14 uses the 2.6 kernel line. > > > > Manually running modprobe will not work as there is no "dac960" kernel > > module for the 2.6 kernel and hardware detection is automatic these days > > (versus 2.2/2.4 kernels). > > Are you sure ? > $ uname -r > 2.6.35.11-83.fc14.i686 > $ grep -i DAC960 /boot/config-2.6.35.11-83.fc14.i686 > CONFIG_BLK_DEV_DAC960=m > $ grep -i DAC960 /lib/modules/2.6.35.11-83.fc14.i686/modules.dep > kernel/drivers/block/DAC960.ko: That is good news. Thank you, Aaron -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
Re: Getting command line to do 'modprobe' on Fedora install
On 29 March 2011 21:51, Alan Cox wrote: > On Tue, 29 Mar 2011 18:24:33 +0100 > Aaron Gray wrote: > > > I need to get to the command line to do a 'modprobe DAC960' on installing > > Fedora. > > > > Is this possible ? > > It should automatically load the module providing it is on the image. It > could be the autoload is failing for some reason or the driver is broken, > or its not on the boot image. > > Unfortunately the one person who really knew it and looked after it > (Leonard Zubkoff) died in an accident some years ago. It no longer really > gets much attention as it's little used and IBM who bought Mylex who > produced it have long dropped it too. > > In fact I think you are the first reference I've seen to it in use for a > couple of years ! > > Probably the best strategy is to investigate using a live image and see > what "dmesg" shows and what occurs if you try and load it. That may give > the info needed for someone to get it going. Thanks Alan, So possible the driver code got broken in newer kernels. I know FC4 used to use Kudzu and moving to FC5 the detection of the 960's no longer worked in Anaconda. How does driver detection work now, is it the same for all Linux distros now ? Like you said I'll try a live distro and dmsg anyway, and see if that reveals any more info. Its more than a couple of years since I removed the RAID cards, the poor old Primergy 470's servers are not as fast as with the DAC960's. I would really like to get the DAC960 working again. Aaron -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
F14 not supporting mouse clicks or left mouse button on HP Pavillion laptop
I have just installed F14 LIVE on my HP Pavillion ze4427 laptop mouse movement works fine but there is no double click tap and the left mouse button does not work. F10 used to work fine on it. Also is there a short cut key combination to get back to the Fedora Gnome menu in order to shut it down ? Help, Aaron -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
Re: F14 not supporting mouse clicks or left mouse button on HP Pavillion laptop
Panic over its just the double click speed needed adjusting :) On 1 April 2011 16:43, Aaron Gray wrote: > I have just installed F14 LIVE on my HP Pavillion ze4427 laptop mouse > movement works fine but there is no double click tap and the left mouse > button does not work. > > F10 used to work fine on it. > > Also is there a short cut key combination to get back to the Fedora Gnome > menu in order to shut it down ? > > Help, > > Aaron > > -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
Re: Getting command line to do 'modprobe' on Fedora install
On 29 March 2011 21:51, Alan Cox wrote: > On Tue, 29 Mar 2011 18:24:33 +0100 > Aaron Gray wrote: > > > I need to get to the command line to do a 'modprobe DAC960' on installing > > Fedora. > > > > Is this possible ? > > It should automatically load the module providing it is on the image. It > could be the autoload is failing for some reason or the driver is broken, > or its not on the boot image. > > Unfortunately the one person who really knew it and looked after it > (Leonard Zubkoff) died in an accident some years ago. It no longer really > gets much attention as it's little used and IBM who bought Mylex who > produced it have long dropped it too. > > In fact I think you are the first reference I've seen to it in use for a > couple of years ! > > Probably the best strategy is to investigate using a live image and see > what "dmesg" shows and what occurs if you try and load it. That may give > the info needed for someone to get it going. DAC960 works again on F14. It was still broken on F9, not sure about the gap. Aaron -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
F14 server
Someone said not to use F14 for servers. What is the reasoning of this if it is true ? Surely with SELinux its going to be more secure than other distros ? Many thanks in advance, Aaron -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
Re: F14 server
On 2 April 2011 00:24, Steven Stern wrote: > On 04/01/2011 06:03 PM, Aaron Gray wrote: > > Someone said not to use F14 for servers. What is the reasoning of this > > if it is true ? > > > > Surely with SELinux its going to be more secure than other distros ? > > > > Many thanks in advance, > > > > Aaron > > > > As has been said, if you're going to do a production server that will > live more than a year, you'll probably want to use CentOS, not Fedora. > Keeping Fedora up to date and "production quality" is just too much work. > > If it's a server you're running for yourself, then go for it. > Yes, I have run FC4. and FC5 for several years, then FC10 on two mirrored servers, for several more years. No complaints in all that time, very good up times. Aaron -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
dhcpd gateway settings
I am trying to set up a network and gateway on 192.168.1.x that I am using
for BOOTP'ing servers.
dhcpd.conf
~~~
allow booting;
allow bootp;
ddns-update-style interim;
ignore client-updates;
subnet 192.168.1.0 netmask 255.255.255.0 {
option subnet-mask 255.255.255.0;
option broadcast-address 192.168.1.255;
option routers 192.168.1.1;
option router-discovery true;
option domain-name-servers 8.8.8.8;
range dynamic-bootp 192.168.1.200 192.168.1.240;
next-server 192.168.0.140;
filename "pxelinux.0";
}
subnet 192.168.0.0 netmask 255.255.255.0 {
}
~~
But I cannot seem to get HTTP or other services to work on 192.168.1.x
I have the existing 192.168.0.x network and was wondering how gateway
requests should get from 192.168.1.x to 192.168.0.1 ?
Many thanks in advance,
Aaron
--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
Re: dhcpd gateway settings
On 22 April 2011 19:28, James Wilkinson wrote: > Aaron Gray wrote: > > I am trying to set up a network and gateway on 192.168.1.x that I am > using > > for BOOTP'ing servers. > > > But I cannot seem to get HTTP or other services to work on 192.168.1.x > > > > I have the existing 192.168.0.x network and was wondering how gateway > > requests should get from 192.168.1.x to 192.168.0.1 ? > > How is this physically laid out? > I have dhcpd running on a laptop with one network controller. > Are the two networks physically separate, and the gateway has two > network cards (and hence is on both networks)? > No, all on the same physical network. > > Is the httpd daemon on the gateway? > No just googling. > > Do you have forwarding turned on on the gateway? > No > Does the gateway also have the connection to the Internet, or is this > from another device? > I want it to work as device 192.168.0.140 > > If the gateway has the Internet connection, have all the devices got the > gateway’s IP address (on the appropriate network) as their gateway? If > not, have you set up static routing as appropriate? > No, maybe thats it ? > > Can a device on the 192.168.0/24 network ping a device on the > 192.168.1/24 network? > No. But 192.168.1.142 can ping 192.168.0.140 > Have you configured httpd to listen on all addresses? Can you connect to > it by it’s 192.168.1/24 address? > I have not setup the HTTP server yet. Want to get google first. > Lots of questions – hopefully one of them will point to the issue. > > Hope this helps, > Thanks, Aaron -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
Re: dhcpd gateway settings
On 22 April 2011 19:37, Rick Sewill wrote:
> On Friday, April 22, 2011 12:11:38 PM Aaron Gray wrote:
> > I am trying to set up a network and gateway on 192.168.1.x that I am
> using
> > for BOOTP'ing servers.
> >
> > dhcpd.conf
> > ~~~
> > allow booting;
> > allow bootp;
> > ddns-update-style interim;
> > ignore client-updates;
> > subnet 192.168.1.0 netmask 255.255.255.0 {
> > option subnet-mask 255.255.255.0;
> > option broadcast-address 192.168.1.255;
> > option routers 192.168.1.1;
> > option router-discovery true;
> > option domain-name-servers 8.8.8.8;
> > range dynamic-bootp 192.168.1.200 192.168.1.240;
> > next-server 192.168.0.140;
> > filename "pxelinux.0";
> > }
> > subnet 192.168.0.0 netmask 255.255.255.0 {
> > }
> > ~~
> >
> > But I cannot seem to get HTTP or other services to work on 192.168.1.x
> >
> > I have the existing 192.168.0.x network and was wondering how gateway
> > requests should get from 192.168.1.x to 192.168.0.1 ?
> >
> > Many thanks in advance,
> >
> > Aaron
>
> If I were a dhcp client, with no other routing configuration information,
> I will arp for the router at 192.168.1.1 to find the router's mac address.
> I would send the packet not destined to my local subnet to the router.
>
> I will not arp for 192.168.0.140 because it is not on my local subnet.
>
> The question becomes, how is the router at 192.168.1.1 configured?
> The router needs to forward the packets to the 192.168.0.x network.
How do I do that ?
>
To see the path, on the 192.168.1.x machine, try traceroute -n 192.168.0.x
>
traceroute works that way round but not the other.
Thanks,
Aaron
--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
Re: dhcpd gateway settings
On 22 April 2011 21:45, James Wilkinson wrote: > Aaron Gray wrote: > > I am trying to set up a network and gateway on 192.168.1.x that I am > using > > for BOOTP'ing servers. > > > But I cannot seem to get HTTP or other services to work on 192.168.1.x > > > > I have the existing 192.168.0.x network and was wondering how gateway > > requests should get from 192.168.1.x to 192.168.0.1 ? > > I asked: > > How is this physically laid out? > > > > Are the two networks physically separate, and the gateway has two > > network cards (and hence is on both networks)? > > Aaron replied: > > I have dhcpd running on a laptop with one network controller. > > > > No, all on the same physical network. > > I asked: > > Do you have forwarding turned on on the gateway? > > Aaron replied: > > No > > That might be a good place to start. > Okay is that IPTables or routing ? > I asked: > > Does the gateway also have the connection to the Internet, or is this > > from another device? > > Aaron replied: > > I want it to work as device 192.168.0.140 > > OK: I don’t quite think I understand this. Unless this is to be a > standalone network (and you mention Google, so…) something’s got to have > a connection to the Internet. > I have a Netgear router serving 192.168.0.x and the laptop is at static IP address 192.168.0.140. > If the laptop has a connection of its own to the Internet (say a 3G > dongle or a USB ADSL modem), what you would want is something like this: > >Internet >^ >| >| > laptop > / \ > / \ > / \ > 192.168.0/24 192.168.1/24 > I want the laptop to serve as a gateway between the 192.168.0.x and 192.168.1.x subnets, so it can serve BOOTP and TFTP to provide PXE booting for diskless servers. > Then all the devices on 192.168.0/24 should have 192.168.0.140 as their > gateway (assuming that’s the laptop’s IP address). You’d probably also > have NAT already turned on. > No the Netgear router provides 192.168.0.1 and 192.168.0.140 is the static IP address of the laptop. > > If, on the other hand, you’ve got a separate router (say an ADSL > router), then what you’ve got is something like this: > > Internet <—–> router <—–> 192.168.1/24 <—–> laptop <—–> 192.168.0/24 > yep, but all on one physical network. > > Then you’ve got a problem for all the other devices on 192.168.1/24. > They know that anything on 192.168.1/24 is local, and should just be > sent on the local network. They “know” that anything else is on the > Internet, and should be sent to the router. > Okay. > So, in particular, anything on 192.168.0/24 isn’t local to them, and > gets sent to the router, not the laptop. > Yes > > What you need to do is to tell everything on 192.168.1/24 to use a > static route: packets to 192.168.0/24 should go to the laptop’s IP > address. > ? > > You might find it easier to get this working with static IP addresses > first, then replicate that with DHCP. > I need DHCP to serve the BOOTP protocol, so static IP's other than the laptops don't really help. > Hope this helps, > Thanks, Aaron -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
Re: dhcpd gateway settings
On 23 April 2011 02:20, Tim wrote: > > Aaron Gray: > > I want the laptop to serve as a gateway between the 192.168.0.x and > > 192.168.1.x subnets, so it can serve BOOTP and TFTP to provide PXE > > booting for diskless servers. > > It doesn't *have* to be the gateway to do that. It can merely be a > server on the LAN. > > It needs to be a DHCP server to serve the BOOTP protocol. Also I need to access HTTP to do netboot. > The only thing that has to be a gateway is that which sits between the > two halves of the network. And I do mean *between*, as it's an > obstacle, not just something else on the same network. > > If the computers on the 192.168.0 and 192.168.1 subnets are actually > sharing a switch/router where they can directly talk to each other, then > they don't need something acting as a gateway. And you could change the > netmask to 255.255.0.0. > Yes but it would not be separately serving DHCP on 192.168.1.x. > It all depends on whether you're trying to enforce a segregation, or > just get two different IP address ranges communicating together. > Just to allow 192.168.1.x to have access to the internet. > James Wilkinson: > >> If, on the other hand, you’ve got a separate router (say an ADSL > >> router), then what you’ve got is something like this: > >> > >> Internet <—–> router <—–> 192.168.1/24 <—–> laptop <—–192.168.0/24 > > > yep, but all on one physical network. > > I have to wonder why do you want 192.168.XXX. subnetting, then? > > If it's not actually separated by hardware, you can't *enforce* separate > networks just by putting in different IPs. > I am not too worried about that its a temporary thing just to allow PXE booting. > >> What you need to do is to tell everything on 192.168.1/24 to use a > >> static route: packets to 192.168.0/24 should go to the laptop’s IP > >> address. > > > ? > > Anything on the 192.168.0 subnet has to go through the 192.168.0 > gateway, and *that* gateway has to have access to whatever it needs > (e.g. the WWW, if necessary). > Yep. > Likewise, everything on the 192.168.1 subnet has to go through the > 192.168.1 gateway, and *that* gateway has to have access to whatever it > needs (e.g. the WWW, if necessary). > This is what I need to know how to set up. > > It gets complicated if one of the gateways has to go through the other. > > >> You might find it easier to get this working with static IP addresses > >> first, then replicate that with DHCP. > > > I need DHCP to serve the BOOTP protocol, so static IP's other than the > > laptops don't really help. > > In general, you give all your servers (computers, routers, whatever) > fixed IPs, and one of them doles out the dynamic ones ones. So, I'm > presuming you've already done that. > > Now, to test that your network actually works, before bashing your head > against a brick wall in configuring your DHCP/BOOTP servers, try > configuring some clients, by hand, with static IPs, and check that they > actually work. If they don't, you've got a networking issue to resolve, > first. If they do, it's only your DHCP/BOOTP servers you need to fix. Yep. Thanks, Aaron -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
Resetting network devices between ifconfig level and desktop level
I have got inconsistent eth devices between what Fedora Gnome Desktop is telling me and what ifconfig is telling me and what 'service network restart' is telling me. Do I have to do a reinstall or is there some way of resetting things ? Many thanks in advance, Aaron -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
Cannot bring eth1 up
I cannot seem to bring eth1 up. # ifup eth1 Error: Connection activation failed: Device not managed by NetworkManager or unavailable # cat ifcfg-eth1 GATEWAY0=192.168.0.1 IPV6INIT=yes BROADCAST="192.168.1.255" DNS1=8.8.8.8 UUID=9c92fad9-6ecb-3e6c-eb4d-8a47c6f50c04 BOOTPROTO=none NAME="System eth1" PREFIX0=24 MACADDR="00:26:18:E4:99:77" NM_CONTROLLED=yes IPV6_FAILURE_FATAL=no TYPE=Ethernet DEVICE=eth1 IPADDR0=192.168.1.1 IPV6_AUTOCONF=yes MTU="" NETMASK="255.255.255.0" IPV6_DEFROUTE=yes DEFROUTE=yes IPADDR="192.168.1.1" NETWORK="" IPV4_FAILURE_FATAL=yes ONBOOT=no HWADDR=00:26:18:E4:99:77 IPV6_PEERDNS=yes IPV6_PEERROUTES=yes Many thanks in advance, Aaron -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
Re: Cannot bring eth1 up
On 10 May 2011 20:43, Rick Stevens wrote: > On 05/10/2011 10:13 AM, Aaron Gray wrote: >> I cannot seem to bring eth1 up. >> >> # ifup eth1 >> Error: Connection activation failed: Device not managed by >> NetworkManager or unavailable >> >> # cat ifcfg-eth1 >> GATEWAY0=192.168.0.1 >> IPV6INIT=yes >> BROADCAST="192.168.1.255" >> DNS1=8.8.8.8 >> UUID=9c92fad9-6ecb-3e6c-eb4d-8a47c6f50c04 >> BOOTPROTO=none >> NAME="System eth1" >> PREFIX0=24 >> MACADDR="00:26:18:E4:99:77" >> NM_CONTROLLED=yes >> IPV6_FAILURE_FATAL=no >> TYPE=Ethernet >> DEVICE=eth1 >> IPADDR0=192.168.1.1 >> IPV6_AUTOCONF=yes >> MTU="" >> NETMASK="255.255.255.0" >> IPV6_DEFROUTE=yes >> DEFROUTE=yes >> IPADDR="192.168.1.1" >> NETWORK="" >> IPV4_FAILURE_FATAL=yes >> ONBOOT=no >> HWADDR=00:26:18:E4:99:77 >> IPV6_PEERDNS=yes >> IPV6_PEERROUTES=yes > > I dunno about the "IPADDR0", "PREFIX0" stuff (in fact, anything with a > "blah0". An interface has but one IP, one netmask, etc. If you want > multiple IPs on a NIC you set up an alias such as eth1:1. Try a minimum > config and see if that works: > > DEVICE=eth1 > BOOTPROTO=static > BROADCAST=192.168.1.255 > HWADDR=00:26:18:E4:99:77 > IPADDR=192.168.1.1 > IPV6INIT=yes > IPV6_AUTOCONF=yes > NETMASK=255.255.255.0 > NETWORK=192.168.1.0 > DNS1=8.8.8.8 > NM_CONTROLLED=yes > ONBOOT=no > > (in truth, you don't need the "NETWORK=" or "BROADCAST=" bits > either...they're inferred by the desired IP and netmask). Thanks. Yes I really need to learn about the ins and outs of Linux networking. Okay, it helps if its physically pugged into another ethernet connection at the other end. Is there anyway of bringing it up automatically for router like behaviour ? Aaron -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
Re: Cannot bring eth1 up
On 10 May 2011 21:39, Aaron Konstam wrote: > On Tue, 2011-05-10 at 18:13 +0100, Aaron Gray wrote: >> I cannot seem to bring eth1 up. >> >> # ifup eth1 >> Error: Connection activation failed: Device not managed by >> NetworkManager or unavailable >> >> # cat ifcfg-eth1 >> GATEWAY0=192.168.0.1 >> IPV6INIT=yes >> BROADCAST="192.168.1.255" >> DNS1=8.8.8.8 >> UUID=9c92fad9-6ecb-3e6c-eb4d-8a47c6f50c04 >> BOOTPROTO=none >> NAME="System eth1" >> PREFIX0=24 >> MACADDR="00:26:18:E4:99:77" >> NM_CONTROLLED=yes >> IPV6_FAILURE_FATAL=no >> TYPE=Ethernet >> DEVICE=eth1 >> IPADDR0=192.168.1.1 >> IPV6_AUTOCONF=yes >> MTU="" >> NETMASK="255.255.255.0" >> IPV6_DEFROUTE=yes >> DEFROUTE=yes >> IPADDR="192.168.1.1" >> NETWORK="" >> IPV4_FAILURE_FATAL=yes >> ONBOOT=no >> HWADDR=00:26:18:E4:99:77 >> IPV6_PEERDNS=yes >> IPV6_PEERROUTES=yes >> >> Many thanks in advance, >> >> Aaron > Ii aggree with Rick. Compare my ifcfg-eth1 to yours. > > DEVICE="eth1" > ESSID="2WIRE924" > HWADDR="00:16:6F:40:E3:59" > NM_CONTROLLED="yes" > ONBOOT="no" > Right. Its what a newly installed and configured Fedora 14 has generated though. Aaron -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
Creating a Gateway
I now have DHCP working fine and a client attached, but am having problems adding a gateway. I have used WebMin to attempt to do it, adding a Static route and setting the "config as Router" option. This has added a file :- $ cat route-eth1 ADDRESS0=192.168.1.0 GATEWAY0=192.168.0.1 NETMASK0=255.255.255.0 have also tried with :- ADDRESS0=192.168.1.1 but I cannot get the remote computer to ping to 192.168.0.1 Many thanks in advance, Aaron -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
Re: Creating a Gateway
On 11 May 2011 18:01, Tim wrote: > On Wed, 2011-05-11 at 17:13 +0100, Aaron Gray wrote: >> I now have DHCP working fine and a client attached, but am having >> problems adding a gateway. >> >> I have used WebMin to attempt to do it, adding a Static route and >> setting the "config as Router" option. >> >> This has added a file :- >> >> $ cat route-eth1 >> ADDRESS0=192.168.1.0 >> GATEWAY0=192.168.0.1 >> NETMASK0=255.255.255.0 > > You've got two different sub-nets there, and the netmask says they're to > be considered differently. Is that what you're intending? > > Theoretically, there has to be a gateway bridging between 192.168.0 and > 192.168.1 (it could be a router, it could be a computer). *It* has to > be able to talk to either side, and each side needs to be told that it's > the gateway. > > e.g. > +--+ > | gateway with | > | two interfaces | > | that communicate | > | with each other | > 192.168.0 network --> | 192.168.0.254 | > | & | > | 192.168.1.254 | <-- 192.168.1 network > +--+ > > The 192.168.0 network has 192.168.0.254 as its gateway. > The 192.168.1 network has 192.168.1.254 as its gateway. > > Any time a computer on the 192.168.0 network tries to talk to something > on the 192.168.1 network, the netmask identifies that address is outside > of its own network, so it must go through the gateway. And vice versa. > > They are isolated from each other, with only the gateway between them, > in theory... In practicality, if you put all the computers with > different addresses on a common switch, it's possible for them to > chatter directly between themselves when you didn't want them to. As > people will break rules, and there are some basic low-level networking > traffic below IP. And this can make things difficult for debugging with > the newcomer who can see network lights blinking but gets networking > errors. > > If you look at a netmask like 255.255.255.0, it's showing you that the > first three quads of the address (192 and 168 and 0) must be the same to > be considered as being on the same network, and therefore directly > communicable between each other. If those parts of the address are > different, then they're not on the same network, and communication has > to be routed through the gateway. > > As far as configuring the gateway, it's a very long time since I've done > this, and I can't remember much beyond having to enable IP forwarding on > it. > > For the sake of network simplicity, it's easiest if your gateway is also > the DHCP server, and all of its LAN interfaces have fixed IP addresses. > It gets messy trying to boot up a computer that's waiting for networks > to be up before the DHCP server will start, and for network interfaces > to come up without a DHCP server to give them an address. > > That's *almost* how my LAN currently works. My DHCP and DNS server is a > computer with fixed IP addresses. NetworkManager is not used on it. > All my computers are on the same subnet. The only gateway I have is the > modem/router to the internet, it's a standalone device, and it's DCHP > server is switched off. My DHCP server doles out IP addresses, puts the > info in the DNS server, tells the clients its own address for the local > DNS server, and gives out the modem/router IP as the gateway. > > P.S. If this is part of some prior thread, I can't tell, as you've > started a new one. So I have no idea about any previous information you > might have supplied. > > -- > [tim@localhost ~]$ uname -r > 2.6.27.25-78.2.56.fc9.i686 > > Don't send private replies to my address, the mailbox is ignored. I > read messages from the public lists. Yes Network Forwarding is enabled. I have an existing network on 192.168.0.1 served by a Netgear Router, then a Linux box with two ethernet cards. I am trying to get the gateway working for the 192.168.1 subnet to be able to see the internet. I tried the gateway address as 192.168.0.254 but that did not work either. Many thanks for the reply, Aaron -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
Networking mailing list ?
Is there a specialized Linux networking mailing list ? Many thanks in advance, Aaron -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
Re: Creating a Gateway
On 11 May 2011 21:24, JB wrote: > Aaron Gray gmail.com> writes: > >> ... > > Spend some time with it: > > http://www.linuxhomenetworking.com/wiki/index.php/Quick_HOWTO_:_Ch03_:_Linux_Networking > > Paragraph 4,5, and in particular 6. Thanks JB ! Aaron -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
Re: Networking mailing list ?
On 11 May 2011 21:17, Bruno Wolff III wrote: > On Wed, May 11, 2011 at 19:56:21 +0100, > Aaron Gray wrote: >> Is there a specialized Linux networking mailing list ? > > http://lartc.org/#mailinglist Many thanks, Aaron -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
Whats happened to SELinux commands and directories on F18 ?
Hi, I have tried to get audit2allow command and to disable SELinux using 'echo 0 >/selinux/enforce' but neither seem to work. Can someone point me in the right direction with SELinux on F18 please ? Many thanks in advance, Aaron -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
Re: Whats happened to SELinux commands and directories on F18 ?
On 30 December 2012 19:42, Andrei Amuraritei wrote: > On , Aaron Gray wrote: > >> Hi, >> >> I have tried to get audit2allow command and to disable SELinux using >> 'echo 0 >/selinux/enforce' but neither seem to work. >> >> Can someone point me in the right direction with SELinux on F18 please ? >> >> Many thanks in advance, >> >> Aaron >> >> > You now have setenforce and getenforce to set Selinux state. Great, thanks I seem to remember that now ! Aaron -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
Re: Whats happened to SELinux commands and directories on F18 ?
On 30 December 2012 19:23, Lars Seipel wrote: > Hi Aaron, > > On Sunday 30 December 2012 18:56:05 Aaron Gray wrote: > > I have tried to get audit2allow command > > Audit2allow is available in policycoreutils-devel. > Thanks ! > > > and to disable SELinux using 'echo > > 0 >/selinux/enforce' > > The SELinux filesystem was moved to /sys/fs/selinux some time ago. You can > also > use setenforce(1) to change mode. > > Lars > > PS: removed devel from CC as the users list is more appropriate for this > issue > Thanks, yes I should have tried users group first, thanks. Aaron -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
Re: Setting video monitor resolution on F18 X Windows Gnome
On 20 January 2013 21:02, Aaron Konstam wrote: > On Sun, 2013-01-20 at 15:31 +0000, Aaron Gray wrote: > > Hi, > > > > I am trying to work out how to set the height and width to use the > > 1280 by 800 full resolution of my laptop monitor. At the moment Gnome > > is giving me 1024 by 768. > > > > I have tried a few things from forums but none of them worked. > > > > Hope someone can help me. > > > > Many thanks in advance, > > > > Aaron > > > > Have you tried System Tools ->System Settings-> Displays > Yeah, I have played with the /etc/X11 conf files from a quick hack "guide" in a forum too, but obviously need to get a proper understanding of them. Aaron -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
F18: FYI "Connection Failed" message box appearing but Ethernet okay.
Hi, I installed F18 yesterday and did updates and everything seemed fine. Today I am getting a black message box at the bottom of the Gnome Window saying "Connection Failed: " ifconfig says everything is okay and I have successfully done a 20 Gig rsync. Aaron -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
Re: F18: FYI "Connection Failed" message box appearing but Ethernet okay.
On 24 January 2013 02:16, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote: > On Thu, 2013-01-24 at 01:22 +0000, Aaron Gray wrote: > > Hi, > > > > I installed F18 yesterday and did updates and everything seemed fine. > > > > Today I am getting a black message box at the bottom of the Gnome Window > > saying "Connection Failed: " > > > > ifconfig says everything is okay and I have successfully done a 20 Gig > > rsync. > > > > Aaron > > Hi, > > > > I installed F18 yesterday and did updates and everything seemed fine. > > > > Today I am getting a black message box at the bottom of the Gnome > > Window saying "Connection Failed: " > > > > ifconfig says everything is okay and I have successfully done a 20 Gig > > rsync. > > Is NetworkManager running? Is it configured to manage your network > interface? If it's running but not configured, Gnome apps will think > you're disconnected even when there's no problem. > Okay, on checking today NetworkManager seems to be running and I am not getting any Network Connection warning box anymore. So I am presuming this was a temporary glitch, despite having done two resets and changing the network adapter. Still stable an hour later :) Many thanks, Aaron -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
F18: Update problems ?
Hi, Is anyone experiencing update problems with Fedora at the moment ? I keep getting restarts and Gnome 3 boot failures into old desktop. Then restart and I get Gnome 3 again after a restart and then it wants to do updates again. And the whole thing goes in a circle. Aaron -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
Re: F18: Update problems ?
On 25 January 2013 00:51, Ed Greshko wrote: > On 01/25/2013 08:32 AM, Aaron Gray wrote: > > Is anyone experiencing update problems with Fedora at the moment ? > > > > I keep getting restarts and Gnome 3 boot failures into old desktop. > > > > Then restart and I get Gnome 3 again after a restart and then it wants > to do updates again. > > > > And the whole thing goes in a circle. > > I've got a VM running Gnome 3 24/7 for testing and having no problems. > > Errors to show us? > Thanks for the reply. I need to know what logs to supply. I am not used to Gnome 3 or system or any of the new fangled things since old Fedora 14. Its all a bit new to me. Thanks, Aaron > > -- > Programming today is a race between software engineers striving to build > bigger and better idiot-proof programs, and the Universe trying to produce > bigger and better idiots. So far, the Universe is winning. -- Rick Cook, > The Wizardry Compiled > -- > users mailing list > users@lists.fedoraproject.org > To unsubscribe or change subscription options: > https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users > Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines > Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org > -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
Re: F18: Update problems ?
On 25 January 2013 05:20, Ed Greshko wrote: > On 01/25/2013 10:31 AM, Aaron Gray wrote: > > On 25 January 2013 00:51, Ed Greshko ed.gres...@greshko.com>> wrote: > > > > On 01/25/2013 08:32 AM, Aaron Gray wrote: > > > Is anyone experiencing update problems with Fedora at the moment ? > > > > > > I keep getting restarts and Gnome 3 boot failures into old desktop. > > > > > > Then restart and I get Gnome 3 again after a restart and then it > wants to do updates again. > > > > > > And the whole thing goes in a circle. > > > > I've got a VM running Gnome 3 24/7 for testing and having no > problems. > > > > Errors to show us? > > > > > > Thanks for the reply. I need to know what logs to supply. I am not used > to Gnome 3 or system or any of the new fangled things since old Fedora 14. > Its all a bit new to me. > > > > > > Not yet sure what logs may be relevant But, you said you're getting > "boot failures" and "restarts". Could you describe a bit more what you > mean by that? > > Years ago I had a "restart" problem where my system would spontaneously > rebootmostly when I wasn't looking. Turned out to be a power supply > problem > > A bit more information may help to narrow the search for answers. > It was circular update reboot reboot gnome 2 reboot gonome 3 restart update, reboot crash, reboot, gnome 3, restart update, Will look for logs now Aaron -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
Re: F18: Update problems ?
Sorry I decided to do a netboot reinstall and everything seems fine now. There maybe a problem with updates from the install DVD or I may have had a system problem, or I may have been hacked. My Windows 8 has been hacked on 3 occasions now over the last three days. Aaron On 25 January 2013 12:01, Aaron Gray wrote: > On 25 January 2013 05:20, Ed Greshko wrote: > >> On 01/25/2013 10:31 AM, Aaron Gray wrote: >> > On 25 January 2013 00:51, Ed Greshko > ed.gres...@greshko.com>> wrote: >> > >> > On 01/25/2013 08:32 AM, Aaron Gray wrote: >> > > Is anyone experiencing update problems with Fedora at the moment ? >> > > >> > > I keep getting restarts and Gnome 3 boot failures into old >> desktop. >> > > >> > > Then restart and I get Gnome 3 again after a restart and then it >> wants to do updates again. >> > > >> > > And the whole thing goes in a circle. >> > >> > I've got a VM running Gnome 3 24/7 for testing and having no >> problems. >> > >> > Errors to show us? >> > >> > >> > Thanks for the reply. I need to know what logs to supply. I am not used >> to Gnome 3 or system or any of the new fangled things since old Fedora 14. >> Its all a bit new to me. >> > >> > >> >> Not yet sure what logs may be relevant But, you said you're getting >> "boot failures" and "restarts". Could you describe a bit more what you >> mean by that? >> >> Years ago I had a "restart" problem where my system would spontaneously >> rebootmostly when I wasn't looking. Turned out to be a power supply >> problem >> >> A bit more information may help to narrow the search for answers. >> > > It was circular update reboot reboot gnome 2 reboot gonome 3 restart > update, reboot crash, reboot, gnome 3, restart update, > > Will look for logs now > > Aaron > > > -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
Re: recommendations for SSD drive as first disk for fedora 18?
I have one of these but on my windows 8 laptop :- http://www.dabs.com/products/samsung-250gb-840-series-sata-6gb-s-2-5--solid-state-drive-8BNX.html Its a good deal but SSD's are coming down in price dramatically. Aaron On 24 January 2013 14:38, Wolfgang S. Rupprecht < wolfgang.ruppre...@gmail.com> wrote: > > Rick Stevens writes: > > And please, PLEASE make sure you have a reliable and consistent backup > > procedure. I like SSDs, but when they die they generally die > > catastrophically and completely (at least in my experience) and you may > > not be able to recover anything from them. > > You can do rsyncs from /etc/cron.daily onto a spare, normally unmounted > and spun-down, disk. That way if your SSD ever goes south, you lose at > most a day's work. When I got my ssd I wasn't sure what to expect, so I > figured I'd play it safe. The only time I needed the daily backup was a > goof that did involve the ssd, but was the result of confusion as to > which directory I was in. The incredible speed of the SSD allowed me to > delete a few thousand pictures in approximately a second. SSD's: > allowing you to make mistakes faster than ever before. ;-) > > -wolfgang > -- > g+: https://plus.google.com/114566345864337108516/about > -- > users mailing list > users@lists.fedoraproject.org > To unsubscribe or change subscription options: > https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users > Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines > Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org > -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
Could someone add keystroke macros to gedit and/or to gnome 3 please ?
Could someone add keystroke macros to gedit please ? Aaron -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
Re: Could someone add keystroke macros to gedit and/or to gnome 3 please ?
Could someone work on a macro recorder to work on Gnome 3 apps and update GEdit to use it please ? Aaron On 26 January 2013 17:13, Aaron Gray wrote: > Could someone add keystroke macros to gedit please ? > > > Aaron > > -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
Re: Could someone add keystroke macros to gedit and/or to gnome 3 please ?
On 27 January 2013 05:57, Fernando Cassia wrote: > On Sat, Jan 26, 2013 at 10:03 PM, Aaron Gray > wrote: > > Could someone work on a macro recorder to work on Gnome 3 apps and update > > GEdit to use it please ? > > > > Aaron > > Aaron, > > You will have better luck by posting your message on the GEdit mailing list > http://projects.gnome.org/gedit/developers.html > Okay thanks. Aaron > > FC > -- > users mailing list > users@lists.fedoraproject.org > To unsubscribe or change subscription options: > https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users > Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines > Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org > -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
Re: Could someone add keystroke macros to gedit and/or to gnome 3 please ?
On 27 January 2013 05:09, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote: > On Sun, 2013-01-27 at 01:03 +0000, Aaron Gray wrote: > > Could someone work on a macro recorder to work on Gnome 3 apps and update > > GEdit to use it please ? > > > > Aaron > > > > On 26 January 2013 17:13, Aaron Gray wrote: > > > > > Could someone add keystroke macros to gedit please ? > > [Please don't top-post on this list] > > This is the wrong place for such requests. You might want to file an RFE > (Request For Enhancement) on Bugzilla. > Sorry I don't normally top-post. I will try that, thanks. Aaron > > poc > > -- > users mailing list > users@lists.fedoraproject.org > To unsubscribe or change subscription options: > https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users > Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines > Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org > -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
Advice needed on setting up a second DHCP network on separate Ethernet controller with access to internet
Hi, with the new firewalld and possible changes to Fedora. I need advice on setting up a second DHCP network on 192.168.01.x on a separate Ethernet controller with access to internet for http and https and DNS for the second network from the existing 192.168.0.1 DHCP network and controller. This is for PXEBOOT'ing new servers. I managed to do this before once on F14 with the old Fedoras configuration and Shorewall, but could not get it to work on F16 when I tried again. I am now wanting to do this again on F18. And would like to ideally do it without Shorewall. And would like to do a HOWTO to accompany the PXEBOOT HOWTO. Hope you can help. Many thanks in advance, Aaron -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
Re: Advice needed on setting up a second DHCP network on separate Ethernet controller with access to internet
Can someone who knows firewalld please do a HOWTO to on setting up a secondary DHCP with DNS and HTTPS access for PXEBOOTing of Fedora18 please ! On 28 January 2013 11:42, Aaron Gray wrote: > Hi, > > with the new firewalld and possible changes to Fedora. I need advice on > setting up a second DHCP network on 192.168.01.x on a separate Ethernet > controller with access to internet for http and https and DNS for the > second network from the existing 192.168.0.1 DHCP network and controller. > > This is for PXEBOOT'ing new servers. I managed to do this before once on > F14 with the old Fedoras configuration and Shorewall, but could not get it > to work on F16 when I tried again. I am now wanting to do this again on > F18. And would like to ideally do it without Shorewall. And would like to > do a HOWTO to accompany the PXEBOOT HOWTO. > > Hope you can help. > > Many thanks in advance, > > Aaron > > -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
What rpm package does login live in ?
Hi, I am wanting to know what RPM package login lives in as I have an incontinuity with rkhunter after a yum update and want to be sure I have a clean version. Many thanks in advance, Aaron -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
"Error: connection activation failed: Device not managed by NetworkManager or unavailable" after moving machine
Hi, "Error: connection activation failed: Device not managed by NetworkManager or unavailable" I am getting the above error and have tried all my normal mods to try and get a connection. I did move the SATA drive from one machine to another and back, changing the MAC address and putting it back in the process. I have tried adding 'NM_CONTROLLED="yes"' to /etc/sysconfig/network-scripts/ifcfg-em1 but still am not able to get it to work. As I cannot connect to the internet on this device I cannot do any yum reinstalls. Hope you can help, Aaron -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
Re: "Error: connection activation failed: Device not managed by NetworkManager or unavailable" after moving machine
Thanks, been down those routes. On 4 September 2013 08:49, g wrote: > > > On 09/03/2013 05:01 PM, Aaron Gray wrote: >> >> Hi, >> >> "Error: connection activation failed: Device not managed by >> NetworkManager or unavailable" >> >> I am getting the above error and have tried all my normal mods to try >> and get a connection. >> >> I did move the SATA drive from one machine to another and back, >> changing the MAC address and putting it back in the process. >> >> I have tried adding 'NM_CONTROLLED="yes"' to >> /etc/sysconfig/network-scripts/ifcfg-em1 >> >> but still am not able to get it to work. >> >> As I cannot connect to the internet on this device I cannot do any yum >> reinstalls. >> >> Hope you can help, >> >> Aaron >> > > sometimes the quickest way to find an answer is to first check forums for > a similar problem to find an answer to a problem. > > when that fails, using an internet search engine can work. > > i chose the latter with ixquick.com, results was 27 hits; > > https://ixquick.com/do/search?q=%22Error%3A+connection+activation+failed%3A+Device+not+managed+by+NetworkManager+or+unavailable%22&lui=english > > watch for line wrap. > > > -- > > peace out. > > in a world with out fences, who needs gates. > > sl6.3 linux > > tc.hago. > > g > . > > -- > users mailing list > users@lists.fedoraproject.org > To unsubscribe or change subscription options: > https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users > Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct > Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines > Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
Re: "Error: connection activation failed: Device not managed by NetworkManager or unavailable" after moving machine
Thanks. It turns out that the mistake was mine and I had the wrong
device plugged in ! Very sorry for the noise :(
On 4 September 2013 17:34, Rick Stevens wrote:
> On 09/03/2013 03:01 PM, Aaron Gray issued this missive:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> "Error: connection activation failed: Device not managed by
>> NetworkManager or unavailable"
>>
>> I am getting the above error and have tried all my normal mods to try
>> and get a connection.
>>
>> I did move the SATA drive from one machine to another and back,
>> changing the MAC address and putting it back in the process.
>>
>> I have tried adding 'NM_CONTROLLED="yes"' to
>> /etc/sysconfig/network-scripts/ifcfg-em1
>>
>> but still am not able to get it to work.
>>
>> As I cannot connect to the internet on this device I cannot do any yum
>> reinstalls.
>
>
> Are you certain the device is still called "em1"? As root, try "ifconfig
> -a".
>
> Several revisions ago many network devices were renamed based on the
> bus they were on and where they appeared on the bus. For example, my
> old "eth0" got renamed "p4p1". My "wlan0" card was also a candidate,
> so I added a rule to "/etc/udev/rules.d/70-persistent-net.rules" to
> keep the old "wlan0" name. The rule looks like:
>
> # PCI device 0x8086:0x008a (iwlagn)
> SUBSYSTEM=="net", ACTION=="add", DRIVERS=="?*",
> ATTR{address}=="bc:77:37:51:11:5c", ATTR{dev_id}=="0x0", ATTR{type}=="1",
> KERNEL=="wlan*", NAME="wlan0"
>
> You could do something similar. Note that the "bc:77:37:51:11:5c"
> is the MAC address of my wireless card. You can extract that from the
> "ifconfig -a" data...it's the thing listed after "ether" in the listing.
> --
> - Rick Stevens, Systems Engineer, AllDigitalri...@alldigital.com -
> - AIM/Skype: therps2ICQ: 22643734Yahoo: origrps2 -
> --
> - I haven't lost my mind. It's backed up on tape somewhere, but -
> - probably not recoverable.-
> --
>
> --
> users mailing list
> users@lists.fedoraproject.org
> To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
> https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
> Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
> Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
> Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
Which RPM is zxcat in ?
Hi, I am wondering what package zxcat is in please ? Many thanks in advance, Aaron -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
Re: Which RPM is zxcat in ?
On 14/09/2013, Steven Stern wrote: > On 09/14/2013 02:12 PM, Aaron Gray wrote: >> Hi, >> >> I am wondering what package zxcat is in please ? >> >> Many thanks in advance, >> >> Aaron >> > Do you mean xzcat? It looks like "yum install xz" will do it. Yep, yep, thanks a lot ! Aaron > > $ yum provides "*/xzcat" > Loaded plugins: langpacks, refresh-packagekit > perl-IO-Compress-Lzma-2.060-2.fc19.noarch : Read and write lzma > compressed data > Repo: fedora > Matched from: > Filename: /usr/share/doc/perl-IO-Compress-Lzma-2.060/xzcat > > > > xz-5.1.2-4alpha.fc19.x86_64 : LZMA compression utilities > Repo: fedora > Matched from: > Filename: /usr/bin/xzcat > > > > xz-5.1.2-4alpha.fc19.x86_64 : LZMA compression utilities > Repo: installed > Matched from: > Filename: /usr/bin/xzcat > > > -- > -- Steve > -- > users mailing list > users@lists.fedoraproject.org > To unsubscribe or change subscription options: > https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users > Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct > Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines > Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org > -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
/dev/mmcblk0 USB device equivalent on Fedora 18
Hi, I am trying to follow some instructions that say do a :- 'xzcat image.img >/dev/mmcblk0' to a USB SD card reader. But '/dev/mmcblk0' does not exist. I have tried usbmon0/1/2/3 but am just getting write errors. Many thanks in advance, Aaron -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
Re: /dev/mmcblk0 USB device equivalent on Fedora 18
Thanks Sam - will check in the morning ! On 9 October 2013 00:21, Sam Varshavchik wrote: > Aaron Gray writes: > >> Hi, >> >> I am trying to follow some instructions that say do a :- >> >> 'xzcat image.img >/dev/mmcblk0' >> >> to a USB SD card reader. But '/dev/mmcblk0' does not exist. >> >> I have tried usbmon0/1/2/3 but am just getting write errors. >> >> Many thanks in advance, > > > What do you see in /var/log/messages, when you insert the card? > > > -- > users mailing list > users@lists.fedoraproject.org > To unsubscribe or change subscription options: > https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users > Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct > Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines > Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org > -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
Re: /dev/mmcblk0 USB device equivalent on Fedora 18
/dev/sda1 on F18 seems to be the one using the FUJIFILM SD card adapter USB device Its very slow on USB 1.0 though ! Many thanks, Aaron On 9 October 2013 01:44, Tim wrote: > Allegedly, on or about 08 October 2013, Aaron Gray sent: >> I am trying to follow some instructions that say do a :- >> >> 'xzcat image.img >/dev/mmcblk0' >> >> to a USB SD card reader. But '/dev/mmcblk0' does not exist. > > I would only expect to get a mmc* device if you plug a MMC card into the > reader. Are you actually using an MMC device? SD cards are a different > thing, and mine appear as things like /dev/sdc1. > > -- > [tim@localhost ~]$ uname -rsvp > Linux 3.9.10-100.fc17.x86_64 #1 SMP Sun Jul 14 01:31:27 UTC 2013 x86_64 > > All mail to my mailbox is automatically deleted, there is no point > trying to privately email me, I will only read messages posted to the > public lists. > > George Orwell's '1984' was supposed to be a warning against tyranny, not > a set of instructions for supposedly democratic governments. > > > > -- > users mailing list > users@lists.fedoraproject.org > To unsubscribe or change subscription options: > https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users > Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct > Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines > Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
Re: /dev/mmcblk0 USB device equivalent on Fedora 18
On 9 October 2013 08:36, Tim wrote: > Allegedly, on or about 09 October 2013, Aaron Gray sent: >> /dev/sda1 on F18 seems to be the one using the FUJIFILM SD card >> adapter USB device > > How do you get a removable device on sda1? RAID? Usually, your hard > drive gets the lowest device. Dunno just plugged it in and looked in /var/log/messages as suggested earlier in the thread. >> Its very slow on USB 1.0 though ! > > Do you have other ports to try? Some computers have USB 1 and 2 ports, > expecting you to use the slower ones for the mouse and keyboard. Not sure, think they are 1.0 or 1.1's its an old server a HP DL 140 G3 > -- > [tim@localhost ~]$ uname -rsvp > Linux 3.9.10-100.fc17.x86_64 #1 SMP Sun Jul 14 01:31:27 UTC 2013 x86_64 > > All mail to my mailbox is automatically deleted, there is no point > trying to privately email me, I will only read messages posted to the > public lists. > > George Orwell's '1984' was supposed to be a warning against tyranny, not > a set of instructions for supposedly democratic governments. > > > > -- > users mailing list > users@lists.fedoraproject.org > To unsubscribe or change subscription options: > https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users > Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct > Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines > Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
F16 on HP DL140 G3 - constant disk access
Hi, I have F16 running on an HP DL140 G3 with SATA RAID controller and drives and am getting constant pulsed disk access. Does know how I can access the SATA diagnostic info from Fedora ? Many thanks in advance, Aaron -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
anyway to log ext4 disk access ?
Hi, I am wondering if there is anyway to log whats gong on on a ext4 disk ? Many thanks in advance, Aaron -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
Re: anyway to log ext4 disk access ?
On 12 March 2012 11:49, Bryn M. Reeves wrote: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA1 > > On 03/11/2012 10:59 PM, Aaron Gray wrote: > > I am wondering if there is anyway to log whats gong on on a ext4 > > disk ? > > > > Many thanks in advance, > > You could use systemtap or blktrace. What kinds of events are you > interested in and how do you want to log them? > I seem to be experiencing constant disk accesses on a new install on F16 and am wondering why and what they are basically. Aaron -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
Re: anyway to log ext4 disk access ?
On 13 March 2012 01:47, Ian Chapman wrote: > On 03/12/2012 10:28 PM, Aaron Gray wrote: > > >> I seem to be experiencing constant disk accesses on a new install on F16 >> and am wondering why and what they are basically. >> >> Aaron >> > > It might be tracker which is part of gnome. It likes to hammer the file > systems with impunity but using a tool such as iotop will probably be your > best bet. Okay iotop showed ext4's jdb2 to be the process accessing the disk periodically. btrace did not reveal anything obvious. Found this bug report which seems to be with lots of different distros, so its a Linux problem rather than a problem with Fedora :- https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/607560 I have two HP DL140 G3 machines, and multiple swappable drives, two lots of F14 SATA mirrored drives, one pair with the problem one without, and an F16 pair which also exhibit the problem. The F14 pair without the problem were installed sometime before the second lot with the problem. The kernel versions of the two F14 pairs are the same. I have tried removing all the RPM's from the newer pair exhibiting the problem but this does not seem to have solved the problem. I have not tried systemtap yet, should I try this, it seems a bit low level and I am not sure on how to use it without quite a lot of looking into things ? Many thanks in advance, Aaron -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
Re: anyway to log ext4 disk access ?
On 14 March 2012 12:50, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote: > On Wed, 2012-03-14 at 12:18 +0000, Aaron Gray wrote: > > The kernel versions of the two F14 pairs are the same. > > F14? You might have mentioned that before. F14 is EOLed, i.e. has *no* > support even for serious bugs. You should consider updating to F15 or > F16 before spending a lot of time debugging something that may already > have been solved. > Please read previous mails. I have the same problem on F16. I just have two F14 instillations on swappable drives, one which exhibits the problem and the other that does not. Aaron -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
Where are libssl and libssl-dev/devel or their equivalents on fedora ?
Hi, Where are libssl and libssl-dev/devel or their equivalents on fedora ? Sorry I am confused ! Many thanks in advance, Aaron -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
libaugeas0 equivalent on Fedora
Hi, I am using F20 and am wondering if there is an equivalent to Debian's libaugeas0 or libaugeas ? Or whether I have to build it for myself ? Many thanks in advance, Aaron -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
Re: libaugeas0 equivalent on Fedora
On 24 February 2015 at 12:07, Michael Schwendt wrote: > On Tue, 24 Feb 2015 11:51:11 +0000, Aaron Gray wrote: > >> Hi, >> >> I am using F20 and am wondering if there is an equivalent to Debian's >> libaugeas0 or libaugeas ? > > Have you searched the packages available in the default repos? > For example, with "yum search augeas". > > A similar answer to your other thread > "Where are libssl and libssl-dev/devel or their equivalents on fedora ?" I found the .so file for it in readline-devel Thanks, Aaron -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
Re: Where are libssl and libssl-dev/devel or their equivalents on fedora ?
sorry for the noise ! On 24 February 2015 at 11:48, Aaron Gray wrote: > Hi, > > Where are libssl and libssl-dev/devel or their equivalents on fedora ? > > Sorry I am confused ! > > > Many thanks in advance, > > Aaron -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
Mounting HD from Live CD
How do I mount an old F21 HD which I have lost the password and work on using a F21 Live CD please ? Many thanks in advance, Aaron -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
Re: Mounting HD from Live CD
non encrypted volume On 12 July 2015 at 21:36, Chris Murphy wrote: > On Sun, Jul 12, 2015 at 2:13 PM, Aaron Gray > wrote: >> How do I mount an old F21 HD which I have lost the password and work >> on using a F21 Live CD please ? > > The question is vague, can you be more specific? Is this drive > encrypted and you're talking about the encryption passphrase? Or > you're talking about the login passphrase? If the former, there is no > way to break that encryption. If the latter, then just mount it > normally and copy off what you want to keep - you don't even need to > do this with live media, any Fedora installation can do this and > bypass the user login. You might have to use sudo cp to copy the > contents of files for which your new user doesn't have permissions > for; and then fix that with: > > sudo chown -R chris:chris /path/to/files/ > > where chris is whatever the login+owner name is on your current system. > > -- > Chris Murphy > -- > users mailing list > users@lists.fedoraproject.org > To unsubscribe or change subscription options: > https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users > Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct > Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines > Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
Re: Mounting HD from Live CD
I just need to mount an unencrypted F"! volume on a Live F21 Distro On 12 July 2015 at 22:07, Aaron Gray wrote: > non encrypted volume > > > On 12 July 2015 at 21:36, Chris Murphy wrote: >> On Sun, Jul 12, 2015 at 2:13 PM, Aaron Gray >> wrote: >>> How do I mount an old F21 HD which I have lost the password and work >>> on using a F21 Live CD please ? >> >> The question is vague, can you be more specific? Is this drive >> encrypted and you're talking about the encryption passphrase? Or >> you're talking about the login passphrase? If the former, there is no >> way to break that encryption. If the latter, then just mount it >> normally and copy off what you want to keep - you don't even need to >> do this with live media, any Fedora installation can do this and >> bypass the user login. You might have to use sudo cp to copy the >> contents of files for which your new user doesn't have permissions >> for; and then fix that with: >> >> sudo chown -R chris:chris /path/to/files/ >> >> where chris is whatever the login+owner name is on your current system. >> >> -- >> Chris Murphy >> -- >> users mailing list >> users@lists.fedoraproject.org >> To unsubscribe or change subscription options: >> https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users >> Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct >> Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines >> Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
Re: Mounting HD from Live CD
Cheers Mike. I did try mounting previously but did not work will try again tomorrow. On 12 July 2015 at 22:39, Mike Wright wrote: > On 07/12/2015 02:08 PM, Aaron Gray wrote: >> >> I just need to mount an unencrypted F"! volume on a Live F21 Distro > > > Easy task at hand. > > If the drive has more than one partition you'll have to do this for each > one. > > sudo mount /dev/sd?# /mnt (e.g. /dev/sdb4) > > rsync -a /mnt/ /path/to/destination > > umount /mnt > > > -- > users mailing list > users@lists.fedoraproject.org > To unsubscribe or change subscription options: > https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users > Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct > Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines > Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
NTP vulnerability
Hi, Whats going on with Fedora and the NTP vulnerability ? Both of my F20 machines don't seem to have ntp installed. Many thanks in advance, Aaron -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
