Location for python plugin to allow letsencrypt(certbot) automated access to GoDaddy DNS
All, I am a complete stranger to python. I am attempting to automate the certificate renewal process for several certificates obtained from Letsencrypt via certbot. My DNS is hosted at GoDaddy.com. I found several projects on github that provide authenticators for GoDaddy that reportedly work with the "certbot renew --manual ..." command. What I don't know is where in the filesystem I should put the .py files so that certbot will find them and I don't have to reinstall everytime there's a python version upgrade. The instructions in the documentation for the add-on use a venv and pip. Are those instructions compatible with fedora packages? Thanks. -- ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
Re: Location for python plugin to allow letsencrypt(certbot) automated access to GoDaddy DNS
On 12/21/23 09:04, John W. Himpel wrote: All, I am a complete stranger to python. I am attempting to automate the certificate renewal process for several certificates obtained from Letsencrypt via certbot. My DNS is hosted at GoDaddy.com. I found several projects on github that provide authenticators for GoDaddy that reportedly work with the "certbot renew --manual ..." command. What I don't know is where in the filesystem I should put the .py files so that certbot will find them and I don't have to reinstall everytime there's a python version upgrade. The instructions in the documentation for the add-on use a venv and pip. Are those instructions compatible with fedora packages? https://community.letsencrypt.org has a very active support group and gives rapid responses. That may be the place to look for assistance. -- ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
Re: Location for python plugin to allow letsencrypt(certbot) automated access to GoDaddy DNS
On Thu, 21 Dec 2023 11:04:27 -0600 John W. Himpel wrote: > What I don't know is where in the filesystem I should put the .py files > so that certbot will find them and I don't have to reinstall everytime > there's a python version upgrade. Don't know. I always find the latest /usr/lib/python3*/site-packages directory, but when a new python comes along, the directory name changes from python3.10 to python3.11, etc. -- ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
Re: Location for python plugin to allow letsencrypt(certbot) automated access to GoDaddy DNS
> On 21 Dec 2023, at 17:04, John W. Himpel wrote: > > All, > > I am a complete stranger to python. > > I am attempting to automate the certificate renewal process for several > certificates obtained from Letsencrypt via certbot. My DNS is hosted > at GoDaddy.com. > > I found several projects on github that provide authenticators for > GoDaddy that reportedly work with the "certbot renew --manual ..." > command. > > What I don't know is where in the filesystem I should put the .py files > so that certbot will find them and I don't have to reinstall everytime > there's a python version upgrade. > > The instructions in the documentation for the add-on use a venv and > pip. Are those instructions compatible with fedora packages? You can install certbot from Fedora RPM and it works just great. I have these RPMs installed on my public facing Fedora Server: $ rpm -qa | grep certbot python3-certbot-2.6.0-4.fc39.noarch python3-certbot-dns-digitalocean-2.6.0-4.fc39.noarch certbot-2.6.0-4.fc39.noarch python3-certbot-apache-2.6.0-4.fc39.noarch I have a `certbot` command in /usr/bin/certbot, no need to care about python. Barry -- ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
Re: Location for python plugin to allow letsencrypt(certbot) automated access to GoDaddy DNS
> On 21 Dec 2023, at 17:04, John W. Himpel wrote: > > All, > > I am a complete stranger to python. > > I am attempting to automate the certificate renewal process for several > certificates obtained from Letsencrypt via certbot. My DNS is hosted > at GoDaddy.com. > > I found several projects on github that provide authenticators for > GoDaddy that reportedly work with the "certbot renew --manual ..." > command. > > What I don't know is where in the filesystem I should put the .py files > so that certbot will find them and I don't have to reinstall everytime > there's a python version upgrade. > > The instructions in the documentation for the add-on use a venv and > pip. Are those instructions compatible with fedora packages? I have systemd timer and service doing the automatic renew dance. I use the certs with apache httpd so that is restarted if the cert changes. This has been run for a few years at this point. $ systemctl cat letsencrypt-renew.timer # /etc/systemd/system/letsencrypt-renew.timer [Unit] Description=Let's Encrypt renew timer [Timer] OnCalendar=05:00 $ systemctl cat letsencrypt-renew.service # /etc/systemd/system/letsencrypt-renew.service [Unit] Description=Let's Encrypt Renewal [Service] ExecStart=/usr/bin/certbot renew --post-hook "/usr/bin/systemctl --no-block restart httpd" Barry > > Thanks. > -- > ___ > users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org > To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org > Fedora Code of Conduct: > https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ > List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines > List Archives: > https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org > Do not reply to spam, report it: > https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue -- ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
Function Key becomes permanently pressed after a couple of minutes after boot (temporary fix: reboot)
# System ``` == Kernel === Installed kernel: 6.6.7-200.fc39.x86_64 == Operating System = OS: Fedora Linux 39 (Workstation Edition) x86_64 Host: Laptop (12th Gen Intel Core) A4 Kernel: 6.6.7-200.fc39.x86_64 Uptime: 2 hours, 27 mins Packages: 7193 (rpm), 202 (brew), 45 (flatpak) Shell: bash 5.2.21 Resolution: 2256x1504 DE: GNOME 45.2 WM: Mutter WM Theme: Adwaita Theme: NumixSolarizedDarkOrange [GTK2/3] Icons: Solarized-FLAT-Orange [GTK2/3] Terminal: vscode CPU: 12th Gen Intel i5-1240P (16) @ 4.400GHz GPU: Intel Alder Lake-P GT2 [Iris Xe Graphics] Memory: 8191MiB / 31802MiB ~~~ Display Server: wayland Systemd Version: systemd 254 (254.7-1.fc39) ~~~Machine~~ Machine: Type: Laptop System: Framework product: Laptop (12th Gen Intel Core) v: A4 serial: FRANDACPA42382002Q Mobo: Framework model: FRANMACP04 v: A4 serial: FRANMACPA423620037 UEFI: INSYDE v: 03.06 date: 11/10/2022 ~~~CPU~~ CPU: Info: 12-core (4-mt/8-st) model: 12th Gen Intel Core i5-1240P bits: 64 type: MST AMCP cache: L2: 9 MiB Speed (MHz): avg: 697 min/max: 400/4400:3300 cores: 1: 808 2: 848 3: 860 4: 900 5: 698 6: 1042 7: 942 8: 400 9: 400 10: 400 11: 896 12: 400 13: 747 14: 400 15: 1020 16: 400 ~~~RAM~~ Memory: System RAM: total: 32 GiB available: 31.06 GiB used: 8.48 GiB (27.3%) igpu: 60 MiB Array-1: capacity: 64 GiB slots: 2 modules: 2 EC: None Device-1: Controller0-ChannelA-DIMM0 type: DDR4 size: 16 GiB speed: 3200 MT/s Device-2: Controller1-ChannelA-DIMM0 type: DDR4 size: 16 GiB speed: 3200 MT/s ~~~Storage~~ Drives: Local Storage: total: 1.82 TiB used: 677.67 GiB (36.4%) ID-1: /dev/nvme0n1 vendor: Samsung model: SSD 990 PRO 2TB size: 1.82 TiB Message: No optical or floppy data found. ~~~LVM~~ Logical: Device-1: VG: vgubuntu type: LVM2 size: 1.82 TiB free: 0 KiB LV-1: Backup type: linear size: 100 GiB Components: p-1: nvme0n1p5 LV-2: Data type: linear size: 100 GiB Components: p-1: nvme0n1p5 LV-3: Documents type: linear size: 250 GiB Components: p-1: nvme0n1p5 LV-4: FedoraHome type: linear size: 18 GiB Components: p-1: nvme0n1p5 LV-5: FedoraRoot type: linear size: 100 GiB Components: p-1: nvme0n1p5 LV-6: FedoraSwap type: linear size: 32 GiB Components: p-1: nvme0n1p5 LV-7: Harddisk type: linear size: 660.64 GiB Components: p-1: nvme0n1p5 LV-8: Media type: linear size: 500 GiB Components: p-1: nvme0n1p5 LV-9: UbuntuHome type: linear size: 18 GiB Components: p-1: nvme0n1p5 LV-10: UbuntuRoot type: linear size: 50 GiB Components: p-1: nvme0n1p5 LV-11: UbuntuSwap type: linear size: 32 GiB Components: p-1: nvme0n1p5 ~~~Graphics Graphics: Device-1: Intel Alder Lake-P GT2 [Iris Xe Graphics] driver: i915 v: kernel Device-2: Realtek [] driver: uvcvideo type: USB Display: server: X.Org v: 23.2.3 with: Xwayland v: 23.2.3 driver: X: loaded: modesetting unloaded: fbdev,vesa dri: iris gpu: i915 resolution: 2256x1504~60Hz API: OpenGL v: 4.6 vendor: intel mesa v: 23.3.1 renderer: Mesa Intel Graphics (ADL GT2) API: EGL Message: EGL data requires eglinfo. Check --recommends. ~~~Audio Audio: Device-1: Intel Alder Lake PCH-P High Definition Audio driver: snd_hda_intel API: ALSA v: k6.6.7-200.fc39.x86_64 status: kernel-api ~~~Battery~~ Battery: ID-1: BAT1 charge: 31.0 Wh (60.2%) condition: 51.5/55.0 Wh (93.5%) volts: 15.8 min: 15.4 ~~~Bluetooth Bluetooth: Device-1: Intel AX210 Bluetooth driver: btusb type: USB Report: btmgmt ID: hci0 rfk-id: 0 state: down bt-service: enabled,running rfk-block: hardware: no software: yes address: 8C:F8:C5:ED:74:4C bt-v: 5.3 ~~~Network~~ Network: Device-1: Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX210/AX211/AX411 160MHz driver: iwlwifi IF: wlp166s0 state: up mac: 1a:35:8a:7f:96:29 ```  - The top bar of my inbuilt laptop keyboard has media keys and some other functions. The media keys work as F1, F2, F3...,F12, when I press them along with the `fn` key. --- - I was on `Fedora Linux (6.5.10-300.fc39.x86_64) 39 (Workstation Edition)` from past few months. From last week the function key on my laptop `fn` becomes permanently pressed randomly after a couple of minutes of reboot . That means I am unable to play media keys as when I press those without pressing `fn
Re: Function Key becomes permanently pressed after a couple of minutes after boot (temporary fix: reboot)
Correction from original post - Correct link to the image:  -- I tested using `xev` - Pressing: `Volume Mute Key`(as can be seen in the image of the keyboard) i.e. `F1` without `fn` ``` KeyPress event, serial 38, synthetic NO, window 0x1c1, root 0x4a4, subw 0x0, time 10824947, (508,1177), root:(558,1304), state 0x0, keycode 67 (keysym 0xffbe, F1), same_screen YES, XLookupString gives 0 bytes: XmbLookupString gives 0 bytes: XFilterEvent returns: False KeyRelease event, serial 38, synthetic NO, window 0x1c1, root 0x4a4, subw 0x0, time 10825079, (508,1177), root:(558,1304), state 0x0, keycode 67 (keysym 0xffbe, F1), same_screen YES, XLookupString gives 0 bytes: XFilterEvent returns: False ``` - Pressing `fn` + `F1` ``` KeyPress event, serial 38, synthetic NO, window 0x1c1, root 0x4a4, subw 0x0, time 10827233, (508,1177), root:(558,1304), state 0x0, keycode 67 (keysym 0xffbe, F1), same_screen YES, XLookupString gives 0 bytes: XmbLookupString gives 0 bytes: XFilterEvent returns: False KeyRelease event, serial 38, synthetic NO, window 0x1c1, root 0x4a4, subw 0x0, time 10827375, (508,1177), root:(558,1304), state 0x0, keycode 67 (keysym 0xffbe, F1), same_screen YES, XLookupString gives 0 bytes: XFilterEvent returns: False ``` -- Thanks and Regards Lamy -- ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
Re: Function Key becomes permanently pressed after a couple of minutes after boot (temporary fix: reboot)
On 12/21/2023 12:20 PM, Lamy Geier wrote: ### What should I do? AFAICT, none of your system specs is even remotely relevant and should have been left out. My suggestion is to start by removing the keycap from your function key (Modern keyboards are made with this in mind.) and cleaning out any cruft you find. Then, try pressing the key with the cap still off to see if it works correctly. Finally, put the cap back on and try again. -- ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
How can you get remote access to laptops behind a NAT/firewall?
In my company, we're rolling out Linux laptops to my team. We're 100% remote workers, no one even lives in the same state as the headquarters. If my teammates are logged into the VPN, it's pretty easy to administer a team member's laptop - I just ask the user for the IP address and ssh in as the service account (with keys, not passwords), or run an Ansible playbook against the machine. For the Windows users (not on my team), our helpdesk uses Quick Assist, and IT can remote desktop into anyone who's logged in to the Azure Active Directory domain. Even if the person is behind a cable modem doing NAT. So my question is, is there any sort of software which is similar to Quick Assist we can install on our Linux laptops so that the Linux team sysadmins can get access to laptops? I've seen folks on this list talk about TeamViewer and AnyDesk, but both of those seem to be paid solutions. Is there any sort of F/OSS solution? I am totally OK with hosting a cloud instance as an authentication server or something like that. I also heard something about Chrome Remote Desktop. Apparently Google does session brokering, so that may be interesting, although we're not a Google shop, we're a Microsoft shop and I'm bringing Linux in. I'd much prefer a F/OSS solution, if anyone has any advice. Thanks for any advice! Thomas -- ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
Re: How can you get remote access to laptops behind a NAT/firewall?
Once upon a time, Thomas Cameron said: > So my question is, is there any sort of software which is similar to > Quick Assist we can install on our Linux laptops so that the Linux > team sysadmins can get access to laptops? I've seen folks on this > list talk about TeamViewer and AnyDesk, but both of those seem to be > paid solutions. Is there any sort of F/OSS solution? In essence, these solutions are functionally like using a VPN. The computer keeps an open connection to a server whenever it can, and that connection can then be used to allow the server to access the computer. So you could set up a separate "management" VPN system, like OpenVPN, that then isolates each client connection (so one user can't access another user's computer directly across it). Don't send a default route, just use an independent RFC1918 (or IPv6 ULA) block from any other corporate networks. -- Chris Adams -- ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
Re: How can you get remote access to laptops behind a NAT/firewall?
On 12/21/23 14:39, Chris Adams wrote: Once upon a time, Thomas Cameron said: So my question is, is there any sort of software which is similar to Quick Assist we can install on our Linux laptops so that the Linux team sysadmins can get access to laptops? I've seen folks on this list talk about TeamViewer and AnyDesk, but both of those seem to be paid solutions. Is there any sort of F/OSS solution? In essence, these solutions are functionally like using a VPN. The computer keeps an open connection to a server whenever it can, and that connection can then be used to allow the server to access the computer. So you could set up a separate "management" VPN system, like OpenVPN, that then isolates each client connection (so one user can't access another user's computer directly across it). Don't send a default route, just use an independent RFC1918 (or IPv6 ULA) block from any other corporate networks. Yeah, I was looking at things like Nebula for a sort of background VPN for systems management, but that looks like overkill. I may wind up just having a tiny OpenVPN instance in the cloud that users can connect to so admins can ssh in or run playbooks over the VPN. I was hoping for something less manual, though. With the Windows laptops, as soon as folks authenticate to Azure AD, the helpdesk guys can just fire up a remote desktop. I'd love something that easy. I suppose I could set up the laptops so that they log into the VPN at boot, that would do the same thing and the staff on the Linux laptops wouldn't have to do anything manual. But I don't want to chew up that VPN bandwidth if I don't have to. Thomas -- ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
Re: Function Key becomes permanently pressed after a couple of minutes after boot (temporary fix: reboot)
You may have pressed Fn+Esc together, which activates Fn lock. https://community.frame.work/t/swap-function-multimedia-keys-by-default/12856/10 -- ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
Re: How can you get remote access to laptops behind a NAT/firewall?
Once upon a time, Thomas Cameron said: > I suppose I could set up the laptops so that they log into the VPN > at boot, that would do the same thing and the staff on the Linux > laptops wouldn't have to do anything manual. But I don't want to > chew up that VPN bandwidth if I don't have to. If you do it as an independent network, separate IP block and no default route, there's almost no bandwidth being chewed when not in use (just keep-alives). That's probably the route I'd go - a system connection so it's always available (doesn't require user interaction, can work when user locks themselves out even :) ). -- Chris Adams -- ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
Re: Function Key becomes permanently pressed after a couple of minutes after boot (temporary fix: reboot)
@Gordon Messmer No, I have not clicked `fn lock` key. I have tested this atleast 5 times that after few minutes of reboot this behavior happens. To prove this I tried clicking `fn lock` nothing happens. To toggle (disable or enable) it we are suppose to press `fn` + `fn lock` but the behavior does not toggles. -- ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
Re: Function Key becomes permanently pressed after a couple of minutes after boot (temporary fix: reboot)
The fn key is (on or off) is not controlled by Linux. The bios and/or keyboard owns/controls it internally. I don't think an OS can even see the fn key exists and/or control/see its state. So you have a hardware problem (key random locks), or a hardware mis-understanding (some combination set it to be locked) of what can cause the fn key to "lock". On Thu, Dec 21, 2023 at 3:55 PM Lamy Geier wrote: > > @Gordon Messmer > > No, I have not clicked `fn lock` key. I have tested this atleast 5 times that > after few minutes of reboot this behavior happens. > > To prove this I tried clicking `fn lock` nothing happens. To toggle (disable > or enable) it we are suppose to press `fn` + `fn lock` but the behavior does > not toggles. > -- > ___ > users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org > To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org > Fedora Code of Conduct: > https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ > List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines > List Archives: > https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org > Do not reply to spam, report it: > https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue -- ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
Re: Function Key becomes permanently pressed after a couple of minutes after boot (temporary fix: reboot)
On 12/21/2023 03:01 PM, Roger Heflin wrote: So you have a hardware problem (key random locks), or a hardware mis-understanding (some combination set it to be locked) of what can cause the fn key to "lock". Which is why I started out by suggesting that the appropriate keyboard key be cleaned. -- ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
Re: rsync fails when transferring multiple files
On 20Dec2023 13:59, Alex wrote: This also isn't a disk space or inode problem or corrupt filesystem problem - the same command works from a different host to this one problematic host without a problem. Destination directory also doesn't matter. Does the different host have the same version of rsync? Cheers, Cameron Simpson -- ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
Re: rsync fails when transferring multiple files
On Thu, Dec 21, 2023 at 6:04 PM Cameron Simpson wrote: > On 20Dec2023 13:59, Alex wrote: > >This also isn't a disk space or inode problem or corrupt filesystem > >problem > >- the same command works from a different host to this one problematic > host > >without a problem. Destination directory also doesn't matter. > > Does the different host have the same version of rsync? > Yes, I indicated that in my initial email. As it turns out, there was some kind of network configuration issue with my network provider that caused this fscking problem. I knew at some point it couldn't have been an rsync problem, but I also wasn't sure if it was a local network problem (routing, problems with the interface, number of open files, buffers, etc). Now I can get on with more productive projects, ugh. Thanks for everyone's help. > > Cheers, > Cameron Simpson > -- > ___ > users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org > To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org > Fedora Code of Conduct: > https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ > List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines > List Archives: > https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org > Do not reply to spam, report it: > https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue > -- ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
Thinkpad screen is squeezed when plugging 3rd monitor
Hi! I've had the problem with F38 but it would go off after 1 (sometimes 2) reboot. It did work earlier this week but as my laptop crashed I did a fresh reinstall. Everything is working well except for this: I have a X1 carbon to which I connect 3 external monitors. When I connect the 3rd one (which ever is third has no importance), the main (laptop) screen is squeezed vertically and the mouse clicks like if the screen was normal (so I need to target a bit off to the right). And since a picture is worth a thousand words... here are the comparison between 2 and 3 connected external monitors: https://imgur.com/a/smMGE5M As I said it actually was working fine before the reinstallation and I'd like to avoid doing that again. Can anyone help me to troubleshot and eventually fix the problem? Thank you very much. Fred -- ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
