Re: Firefox - how to lose top bar / title bar - ?
On 13/08/2022 22:58, Samuel Sieb wrote: On 8/13/22 01:05, lejeczek via users wrote: How to lose title bar in current version of Firefox. I have my user whose Firefox "profile" I kept for many years as Fedora & Firefox kept updating - there I have no title-bar. I sudo to another user and title-bar is there. I'm pretty sure it's because you're running it over an X connection so it doesn't use client-side decorations. ___ correct - I can confirm what with su/sudo Firefox defaults to: Window Protocol x11 I wonder why would that be - is it su/sudo which would not handle this "correctly"? I also tried: MOZ_ENABLE_WAYLAND=1 in sudoed-to user but that seems to change nothing. I wonder if this is perhaps Wayland's "issue"? a candidate for BZ? thanks, L. ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
Re: puzzling message/suggestion during weekly patches. [SOLVED]
On Sat, 2022-08-13 at 16:40 -0700, Samuel Sieb wrote: > On 8/13/22 07:48, home user wrote: > > On 8/12/22 3:37 PM, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote: > > > On Fri, 2022-08-12 at 13:43 -0600, home user wrote: > > > > On 8/11/22 12:39 PM, home user wrote: > > [... snip ...] > > > > > > AFAIK Fefault Fedora Workstation installs don't have sendmail. I > > > know > > > mine certainly doesn't as there's no need for it, so I wonder why > > > your > > > system even has it installed. > > > > > > poc > > > > Patrick, > > > > It was apparently a part of the initial Fedora install on this > > workstation a long long time ago in a galaxy far far away: > > A long time ago, sendmail was part of the default install. I think I remember that. Be that as it may, this is why I suggest a reinstall might be in order. This is the kind of thing that an update is never going to remove, because some package has been configured to use it. The fact that said package could be reconfigured to not use it is beyond dnf's capabilities, which is understandable. poc ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
Re: remote-viewer initial screen size?
On 8/12/22 01:16, ToddAndMargo via users wrote: Hi All, With remote-viewer, is there a way to set the initial screen size on start up? Not finding it in: https://www.systutorials.com/docs/linux/man/1-remote-viewer/ Many thanks, -T I just added: RFE: remote-viewer, please add command line window size https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2118117 ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
Re: remote-viewer initial screen size?
> On 14 Aug 2022, at 12:56, ToddAndMargo via users > wrote: > > On 8/12/22 01:16, ToddAndMargo via users wrote: >> Hi All, >> With remote-viewer, is there a way to set the initial >> screen size on start up? >> Not finding it in: >> https://www.systutorials.com/docs/linux/man/1-remote-viewer/ >> Many thanks, >> -T > > I just added: > > RFE: remote-viewer, please add command line window size > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2118117 You need to ask remote-viewer devs to add this not fedora. After that fedora can update its package. Barry > ___ > users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org > To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org > Fedora Code of Conduct: > https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ > List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines > List Archives: > https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org > Do not reply to spam, report it: > https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
Re: remote-viewer initial screen size?
On 8/14/22 04:56, ToddAndMargo via users wrote: On 8/12/22 01:16, ToddAndMargo via users wrote: Hi All, With remote-viewer, is there a way to set the initial screen size on start up? Not finding it in: https://www.systutorials.com/docs/linux/man/1-remote-viewer/ Many thanks, -T I just added: RFE: remote-viewer, please add command line window size https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2118117 And: RFE: remote-viewer, please add command line window size option https://gitlab.com/virt-viewer/virt-viewer/-/issues/87 ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
Re: Current Fedora version of ImageMagick is from 2017
On Fri, Aug 12, 2022 at 10:30 AM Bob Marcan wrote: > On Fri, 12 Aug 2022 08:45:13 -0300 > "George N. White III" wrote: > > > On Wed, Aug 10, 2022 at 7:52 PM Paul Smith wrote: > > > > > Thanks to all who have answered! GraphicsMagick seems to be a good > > > alternative to ImageMagick -- thanks for the suggestion. > > > > > > > I use *Magick command-line tools (convert, etc.): I don't get them from > > GraphicsMagick: > > > > % doas dnf provides /usr/bin/convert > > Last metadata expiration check: 3:14:26 ago on Fri Aug 12 05:25:01 2022. > > ImageMagick-1:6.9.12.44-1.fc36.i686 : An X application for displaying and > > manipulating images > > Repo: fedora > > Matched from: > > Filename: /usr/bin/convert > > > > ImageMagick-1:6.9.12.44-1.fc36.x86_64 : An X application for displaying > and > > manipulating images > > Repo: fedora > > Matched from: > > Filename: /usr/bin/convert > > > > ImageMagick-1:6.9.12.52-1.fc36.i686 : An X application for displaying and > > manipulating images > > Repo: updates > > Matched from: > > Filename: /usr/bin/convert > > > > ImageMagick-1:6.9.12.52-1.fc36.x86_64 : An X application for displaying > and > > manipulating images > > Repo: updates > > Matched from: > > Filename: /usr/bin/convert > > > > http://www.graphicsmagick.org/GraphicsMagick.html > > gm animate [ options ... ] file [ [ options ... ] file ... ] > [...] The Debian/Ubuntu world has a compatibility package that provides Graphics Magick versions of the ImageMagick tools My use cases are very basic so I hope the differences with GraphicsMagick won't cause problems. Fedora requires some effort to avoid editing legacy scripts and makefiles (that are shared with other users so need to work across multiple platforms). I created a /usr/local/gm/bin directory with a bunch of links to "all.sh": that has "exec /usr/bin/gm ...". and use environment modules to add the new gm/bin directory to the path when needed. -- George N. White III ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
Re: Firefox - how to lose top bar / title bar - ?
On 8/14/22 01:16, lejeczek via users wrote: On 13/08/2022 22:58, Samuel Sieb wrote: On 8/13/22 01:05, lejeczek via users wrote: How to lose title bar in current version of Firefox. I have my user whose Firefox "profile" I kept for many years as Fedora & Firefox kept updating - there I have no title-bar. I sudo to another user and title-bar is there. I'm pretty sure it's because you're running it over an X connection so it doesn't use client-side decorations. ___ correct - I can confirm what with su/sudo Firefox defaults to: Window Protocol x11 I wonder why would that be - is it su/sudo which would not handle this "correctly"? I also tried: MOZ_ENABLE_WAYLAND=1 in sudoed-to user but that seems to change nothing. I wonder if this is perhaps Wayland's "issue"? You can't connect to Wayland when you su because of permissions. Well, maybe you could make it work if you share the $XAUTHORITY file and set the environment variable. ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
opinions: backups
I just thought I would ask for opinions on backups that people use. I have thought about the old fashioned dump/restore; IDK if that would be good for modern use or not. My system isn't really that big. My allotted size is 30 Gig, and it's not full. There's dar and xar and fsarchiver. There's backing up with btrfs too. I am thinking about back ups of the whole system and rpms I have installed. And maybe not backing up logs, old settings like are stored in the root directory of the user(s) and root account. Does anyone use any of these or other backups? I just want to save my rpms and not have to download all from scratch. IDK if dar or dump would backup things like /sys or other system directories. I have created dump backups but not really restored from scratch. Bill ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
Re: opinions: backups
> On 14 Aug 2022, at 22:08, Bill Cunningham wrote: > > I just thought I would ask for opinions on backups that people use. I > have thought about the old fashioned dump/restore; IDK if that would be good > for modern use or not. My system isn't really that big. My allotted size is > 30 Gig, and it's not full. There's dar and xar and fsarchiver. There's > backing up with btrfs too. > > I am thinking about back ups of the whole system and rpms I have > installed. And maybe not backing up logs, old settings like are stored in the > root directory of the user(s) and root account. > > Does anyone use any of these or other backups? I just want to save my > rpms and not have to download all from scratch. IDK if dar or dump would > backup things like /sys or other system directories. I have created dump > backups but not really restored from scratch. Have a look at duplicity, it works well. I use it to back from to my file server. You can use it to run frequently, I run it every hour. That provides Mac like time machine features. Barry > > Bill > > ___ > users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org > To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org > Fedora Code of Conduct: > https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ > List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines > List Archives: > https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org > Do not reply to spam, report it: > https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
Re: opinions: backups
On Sun, 14 Aug 2022 17:08:23 -0400 Bill Cunningham wrote: > I just thought I would ask for opinions on backups that people > use. I have thought about the old fashioned dump/restore; IDK if that > would be good for modern use or not. My system isn't really that big. > My allotted size is 30 Gig, and it's not full. There's dar and xar > and fsarchiver. There's backing up with btrfs too. > > I am thinking about back ups of the whole system and rpms I have > installed. And maybe not backing up logs, old settings like are > stored in the root directory of the user(s) and root account. > > Does anyone use any of these or other backups? I just want to > save my rpms and not have to download all from scratch. IDK if dar or > dump would backup things like /sys or other system directories. I > have created dump backups but not really restored from scratch. > rsync with directory-specific excludes. All directories to be backed-up in their own partitions, so as to avoid rpm-loaded code, which can be restored from the web. ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
Re: opinions: backups
On Sun, 14 Aug 2022 17:08:23 -0400
Bill Cunningham wrote:
> Does anyone use any of these or other backups?
My main backup is rsyncing everything to a big old NAS I put together
from an old PC and truenas software. I use the --link-dest option
to get a complete copy of everything on every backup (with 99% of it
just being hard links to the previous days backup).
Unless you are on dial up or something, the least of your problems
will be re-downloading all the rpms. I just keep a list of rpms
using:
rpm -q --qf "%{NAME}.%{ARCH}\n" -a > f36-rpms.txt
and update it every day on cron (and that list gets backed up
along with everything else).
___
users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct:
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives:
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it:
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
Re: opinions: backups
On Sun, 2022-08-14 at 17:08 -0400, Bill Cunningham wrote: > I just thought I would ask for opinions on backups that people > use. > I have thought about the old fashioned dump/restore; IDK if that > would > be good for modern use or not. My system isn't really that big. My > allotted size is 30 Gig, and it's not full. There's dar and xar and > fsarchiver. There's backing up with btrfs too. > > I am thinking about back ups of the whole system and rpms I have > installed. And maybe not backing up logs, old settings like are > stored > in the root directory of the user(s) and root account. > > Does anyone use any of these or other backups? I just want to > save > my rpms and not have to download all from scratch. IDK if dar or dump > would backup things like /sys or other system directories. I have > created dump backups but not really restored from scratch. I used to use rsnapshot, which is basically a front-end to rsync, and it worked pretty well. Nowadays I use BorgBackup because it does compression and de-duplication. My backup device is a pair of old HDDs mounted on a USB3 dock and formatted as a BTRFS filesystem with Raid-1. poc ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
Re: opinions: backups
On 8/14/22 2:08 PM, Bill Cunningham wrote: I just thought I would ask for opinions on backups that people use. I have thought about the old fashioned dump/restore; IDK if that would be good for modern use or not. My system isn't really that big. My allotted size is 30 Gig, and it's not full. There's dar and xar and fsarchiver. There's backing up with btrfs too. I am thinking about back ups of the whole system and rpms I have installed. And maybe not backing up logs, old settings like are stored in the root directory of the user(s) and root account. Does anyone use any of these or other backups? I just want to save my rpms and not have to download all from scratch. IDK if dar or dump would backup things like /sys or other system directories. I have created dump backups but not really restored from scratch. Bill I've been using BackupPC for many years. It can use rsync via ssh for remote backups or rsync directly for local (LAN) backup. It can automatically dedup as well. I use it to do daily incremental backups and weekly full backups for 12 systems, Four locally and eight remotely. A couple of years ago my workshop, office and server room was destroyed in a fire. Because I had recent backups I was able to get the four servers I lost back on-line and fully functional after only a single day scrambling to get new hardware and rebuild the backup server. Note that I send compressed archive copies to a remote server and that is what I used to restore the primary backup server. I have never had a problem with backups and have successfully restored complete servers and individual filesor directories for many years. My current primary backup server is running on CentOS 7 and has been since CentOS 7 was first available, and on CentOS 6 before that. My secondary backup server is on my local Fedora workstation. I'll be building a new backup server, probably on Rocky Linux 9, soon. I cannot imagine using anything but BackupPC. As for you wanting to backup your system's RPM files, BackupPC can be configured to backup an entire server or workstation, or only parts of them including individual files. For example I backup only /etc, /home and a few other critical directories on four servers, and for each of them I cause a daily database dump and create a list of packages currently installed, that also get backed up. It can take longer to restore those servers, but as they are not critical infrastructure, I wouldn't matter much if they were down for a day or two while we procure and rebuild those servers. https://backuppc.github.io/backuppc/ Emmett ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
Re: opinions: backups
On 14Aug2022 15:22, Emmett Culley wrote: >I've been using BackupPC for many years. It can use rsync via ssh for >remote backups or rsync directly for local (LAN) backup. It can >automatically dedup as well. We had a client using BackupPC. Maybe for a single PC it works well. They were backing up several (well over 10) PCs to a NAS. It hammered the system in both I/O and CPU. Combined with some (old kernel) filesystem bugs, it would mangle the filesystem. It seems to do the rsync protocol _in Perl_ at the BackupPC end, and uses an elaborate hash-named file tree for the deduplication function. It needed a special web interface to browse/restore. It kind of works, but does not scale. Now we use histbackup (disclaimer: a script of my own similar in use and implementation to rsnapshot). The backups are MUCH faster and we haven't had the (again, ancient kernel) filesystem bugs at all. because even though we run the backups in series, it is still much faster. Basic scheme is: - a directory per target (machine:subdir) - timestampted hardlinked subtrees in each of the targets Hardlink the previous backup to a new tree for today's backup, rsync from the target into the new tree. rsnapshot does the same kind of thing and modern rsync even has a mode to do the "new hard link tree and sync" part of this as a command line switch. The trees are just... directory trees you can cd around in etc. We NFS export them from the NAS read only so they can be directly browsed. Because its NFS, the UIDs etc are identical and therefore people can't brwose stuff they can't browse in the live filesystems anyway. These days I use this script: https://github.com/cameron-simpson/css/blob/main/bin-cs/run-backups for my personal backups. I'm usually prepared to rebuilt an utterly failed machine instead of restoring an OS from backup. Cheers, Cameron Simpson ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
Re: opinions: backups
On 14 Aug 2022 at 17:08, Bill Cunningham wrote: Date sent: Sun, 14 Aug 2022 17:08:23 -0400 To: users@lists.fedoraproject.org From: Bill Cunningham Subject:opinions: backups Send reply to: Community support for Fedora users > I just thought I would ask for opinions on backups that people use. > I have thought about the old fashioned dump/restore; IDK if that would > be good for modern use or not. My system isn't really that big. My > allotted size is 30 Gig, and it's not full. There's dar and xar and > fsarchiver. There's backing up with btrfs too. > > I am thinking about back ups of the whole system and rpms I have > installed. And maybe not backing up logs, old settings like are stored > in the root directory of the user(s) and root account. > > Does anyone use any of these or other backups? I just want to save > my rpms and not have to download all from scratch. IDK if dar or dump > would backup things like /sys or other system directories. I have > created dump backups but not really restored from scratch. > There have been a lot of replies, but I'll add an option that probable isn't a full solution. I've been the maintainer of G4L project on sourceforge since 2004. I build in on my Fedora 35 system at moment for next version. Last release version was built on Fedora 34. It is a bare metal backup system by default, making disk or partition backups that can be restored. Basically a dd image compressed using lzop or gzip. Can back to local disk or via network (default is ftp using ncftp). Does have fsarchiver include, but only tested it once. Had a user request adding it, so didn't and did hear it worked will for him. But being a bare metal backup, it copies everything. Clearing unused sectors before greatly reduces size of image. Using lzop is faster than using gzip, and image only slightly larger. Do a image every few months, but use rsync to copy critical directories between machine for things that need more often backups.. Recently migrated 3 machines from regular hard disk to ssd disk using clone option. With 1T drives it took 4 to 7 hours, so speed is dependent on unbuffers speed. Made the mistake of hooking an ssd disk via a usb 2 adapter on the one that took 7 hours, but notebook only had 1 disk bay.. Kernels are built from source kernel.org, and try to include most disk and network controller. Boots from CD, or from USB, and can be added to a regular grub2 menu with 40_custom addition. Has a UEFI boot option, but haven't figured how to do a UEFI boot from grub2 setup. Is text based using dialog screen. Before retiring used it at college a lot. Could restore Windows 10 partition in about 10 minutes. Whole disk took about 45 minutes with Windows 10 and Fedora. Also, used udpcast to image one system in lab to other 19 machines using the multi-cast in about 45 minutes. There is also G4U, Clonezilla and other similar programs. > Bill > > ___ > users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org > To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org > Fedora Code of Conduct: > https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ > List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines > List Archives: > https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org > Do not reply to spam, report it: > https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue ++ Michael D. Setzer II - Computer Science Instructor (Retired) mailto:mi...@guam.net mailto:msetze...@gmail.com Guam - Where America's Day Begins G4L Disk Imaging Project maintainer http://sourceforge.net/projects/g4l/ ++ ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
