Re: Opera Mail & Browser after upgrading Fedora31 to Fedora32 . Ed Greshko.
1) opera-stable-54.0.2952.71-1.fc29R.x86_64.rpm is from russian Fedora, then you can report here... https://github.com/RussianFedora/opera-stable/blob/master/opera-stable.spec 2) opera-12.16-1860.x86_64.rpm (unsupported) Fedora drops all gstreamer 0.x 3) Opera mail doesn't exist anymore... 4) Updated versions of opera... (but without support widevine and limited support of video formats and codecs) https://rpm.opera.com/rpm/ 5) Third-party UnitedRPMs provides a rpm... Copy from the official opera-stable rpm, but with support of widevine and full video formats and codecs) ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org
Unable to boot from imported OVA file in virt-manager
Anyone here familiar with virt-manager ? I have an OVA file of Windows 10 from VirtualBox that I would like to use in virt-manager. I have imported the file, but when I try to boot it shows "No bootable device", "Hard disk is not bootable". I tried changing the I/O type to "virtio" and the disk type to qcow2, but no dice. What am I doing wrong ? Is there any way I can convert the OVA to VMDK in Fedora ? Thanks. -- Regards, Sreyan ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: Unable to boot from imported OVA file in virt-manager
On 2020-05-05 17:46, Sreyan Chakravarty wrote: > Anyone here familiar with virt-manager ? > > I have an OVA file of Windows 10 from VirtualBox that I would like to use in > virt-manager. > > I have imported the file, but when I try to boot it shows "No bootable > device", "Hard disk is not bootable". > > I tried changing the I/O type to "virtio" and the disk type to qcow2, but no > dice. > > What am I doing wrong ? > > Is there any way I can convert the OVA to VMDK in Fedora ? > > Thanks. > Did you do something similar to what is shown here? https://blog.ricosharp.com/posts/2019/Converting-ova-file-to-qcow2 -- The key to getting good answers is to ask good questions. ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: Unable to boot from imported OVA file in virt-manager
For VirtualBox you may adapt the following to your needs: VBoxManage clonehd original_disk.vmdk destination.disk.vdi --format VDI --type normal suomi On 05/05/2020 11.46, Sreyan Chakravarty wrote: Anyone here familiar with virt-manager ? I have an OVA file of Windows 10 from VirtualBox that I would like to use in virt-manager. I have imported the file, but when I try to boot it shows "No bootable device", "Hard disk is not bootable". I tried changing the I/O type to "virtio" and the disk type to qcow2, but no dice. What am I doing wrong ? Is there any way I can convert the OVA to VMDK in Fedora ? Thanks. ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: Unable to boot from imported OVA file in virt-manager
On 5/5/20 3:32 PM, Ed Greshko wrote: Did you do something similar to what is shown here? https://blog.ricosharp.com/posts/2019/Converting-ova-file-to-qcow2 Worked like a charm. Thanks a lot. -- Regards, Sreyan ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: Unable to boot from imported OVA file in virt-manager
On 5/5/20 5:06 PM, fedora wrote: For VirtualBox you may adapt the following to your needs: VBoxManage clonehd original_disk.vmdk destination.disk.vdi --format VDI --type normal suomi It works when I converted it to a qemu image. Thanks anyway. -- Regards, Sreyan ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: Creating a livecd for 32 on 30
On Mon, 4 May 2020 21:32:10 -0700 Samuel Sieb wrote: > On 5/4/20 7:37 PM, Geoffrey Leach wrote: > > Goal: to create an install live CD on Fedora 30 for v32. > > > > When I did this a year ago for 28->30, this went without a hitch. > > This time, not so. > > > > I'm following "Creating and using live CD" from the official docs. > > Packages livecd-tools and spin-kickstarts are installed. > > This is an xfce install, so I'm using the fedora-live-xfce.ks > > selinux is not onstalled. > > You want to create a custom live CD? You can't use one of the > standard ones? H ... good question. Looks like I misinterpreted the doc. What I need is the standard spin (as you said) and livecd-iso-to-disk. Thanks. ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org
Dual monitors not always powering off
Hi, I have dual monitors configured on a Fedora 30 PC. I'm using the XFCE4 desktop. Using xscreensaver I've configured the monitors to be powered off after 15 minutes of inactivity. 90+% of the time the monitors do get powered off, but every once in a while I'll come back to my PC and see that the monitors are blanked with backlight on instead of being powered off. Any suggestions on how I might troubleshoot this? Thanks, Dave ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org
F32 Install hangs on Lenovo x140e
I downloaded the F32 Server netinstall CD. I wanted a F32 Workstation netinstall, but I could not find one. :( The system is a Lenovo x140e that I got used on ebay with no HD and only 4GB memory. I pulled an SSD that had F28 on it and added 4GB memory. this system will not boot as is. I put the CD in a USB DVD/CD device, turn on the computer, press F12 for boot menu and select the CD. I get the Install 32 or check media option and select Install. After a bit of time it goes back to the system boot message offering to start F28 (which won't work anyway). What do I do to figure out what is wrong? I pulled an old Lenovo x120e and did the same start up. I got into the install menu for F32, so I don't think it is the CD media. any one have experience with the x140e? Anyone can give me some suggestions? Bob ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: Extensions Panel on Gnome Menu Doesn't Do Anything--SOLVED
On 5/4/20 10:44 AM, Tim Evans wrote: The drop-down gnome shell menu in F32 (upper right hand corner of the desktop) has a new "Extensions" panel now. It's very prominent, with an extra large @-like icon. Unfortunately, it does nothing other than change from black to blue when clicked. Is it supposed to do something else? So, this turns out to be an issue with a Gnome Shell Extension called "Extensions" (https://extensions.gnome.org/extension/1036/extensions/). While I have several such extensions installed, this one was NOT installed prior to upgrading my system to F32; it apparently came with the F32 upgrade. It appeared on the top panel menu after the update and, as noted, did not work and was graphically distorted. When accessing this particular extension's web page, I was prompted to update it. After logging out/in (e.g., restarting Gnome Shell) the over-large icon for the extension on the drop-down menu was properly sized and clicking it opens a menu of installed extensions to manage. -- Tim Evans | 5 Chestnut Court | Owings Mills, MD 21117 | 443-394-3864 ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: F32 Install hangs on Lenovo x140e
On 5/5/20 9:18 AM, Robert Moskowitz wrote: > I downloaded the F32 Server netinstall CD. > > I wanted a F32 Workstation netinstall, but I could not find one. :( > > The system is a Lenovo x140e that I got used on ebay with no HD and > only 4GB memory. I pulled an SSD that had F28 on it and added 4GB > memory. > > this system will not boot as is. why not? It makes me wonder if you have hardware or hardware config problem (bios settings) already at this stage. > > I put the CD in a USB DVD/CD device, turn on the computer, press F12 > for boot menu and select the CD. > > I get the Install 32 or check media option and select Install. maybe select "check media and install" instead, if you are having problems installing. > > After a bit of time it goes back to the system boot message offering > to start F28 (which won't work anyway). > > What do I do to figure out what is wrong? > > I pulled an old Lenovo x120e and did the same start up. I got into > the install menu for F32, so I don't think it is the CD media. so, it sounds like hardware/hardware config. Maybe that ssd is borked. Maybe the bios is setup wrong. Maybe the laptop has other hardware problems that caused it to be sold in the first place. Will a live cd run? Maybe you could get some info/diagnostics that way? > > any one have experience with the x140e? no > Anyone can give me some suggestions? > > Bob > ___ > users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org > To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org > Fedora Code of Conduct: > https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ > List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines > List Archives: > https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: Lost Mate-panel
On Mon, 04 May 2020 13:31:40 -0700, Samuel Sieb wrote: > What does "cat /etc/fedora-release" tell you? It said 32, much to my surprise. I was pretty sure (to my earlier surprise) that all the packages it had been showing me were 31. > If it says you're on F31, then run: > "dnf system-upgrade download --release=32 --allowerasing" See below. > If it says you're on F32, then run: > "dnf distro-sync" > and see what that offers to do. It hit a great long (half a screenful) list of problems. I tried the upgrade; it reminded me to refresh, and I did; it installed inxi, whatever that is. Then it hit the upgrade problems again, and this time suggested "--allowerasing"; so I added that to " --skip-broken." It stopped with the problem of sudo, systemd, and systemd-udev -- Beartooth Staffwright, Not Quite Clueless Power User Remember I know little (precious little!) of where up is! ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: F32 Upgrade error: more space needed on the / filesystem... --live-root ?
"Oh, forgot that before doing the lvresize I did lvchange to deactivate the LV" So what were the exact steps you used ? ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: Lost Mate-panel
On 5/5/20 9:03 AM, Beartooth wrote: On Mon, 04 May 2020 13:31:40 -0700, Samuel Sieb wrote: What does "cat /etc/fedora-release" tell you? It said 32, much to my surprise. I was pretty sure (to my earlier surprise) that all the packages it had been showing me were 31. If it says you're on F32, then run: "dnf distro-sync" and see what that offers to do. It hit a great long (half a screenful) list of problems. I tried the upgrade; it reminded me to refresh, and I did; it installed inxi, whatever that is. Then it hit the upgrade problems again, and this time suggested "--allowerasing"; so I added that to " --skip-broken." It stopped with the problem of sudo, systemd, and systemd-udev It sounds like you started the the upgrade process but it failed part way through. I think doing a re-install would be the much easier option, but if you want to keep trying, then we can try a bit more. What is the output of "dnf distro-sync --allowerasing" (at least the problem parts)? ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: F32 Upgrade error: more space needed on the / filesystem... --live-root ?
Hi. On Mon, 04 May 2020 17:37:02 -0700 Samuel Sieb wrote: > On 5/4/20 4:33 PM, linux guy wrote: >> Disk Requirements: >>At least 5265MB more space needed on the / filesystem. >> # df -h >> Filesystem Size Used Avail Use% Mounted on >> /dev/mapper/fedora_localhost--live-root 49G 48G 0 100% / >> How does one resize --live-root ? > The alternate solution which I have used on several occasions is to > symlink /var/lib/dnf/system-upgrade to somewhere with enough space for > the rpm files. Right. I do that also for /var/cache/dnf, but before doing that, or resizing the LV's, I suggest to check if you can suppress files/directories to make free space in / 49G, even with /var/lib/dnf/system-upgrade seems too big for F31. Proceed for example as follows; cd / du -h -x --max-depth 1 | sort -h | tail then iterate on the big subdirs shown. The winners are often: /var/cache/PackageKit /var/spool/abrt /var/cache/abrt-di /root /var/lib/docker -- francis ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: F32 Upgrade error: more space needed on the / filesystem... --live-root ?
On 2020-05-06 00:38, linux guy wrote: > "Oh, forgot that before doing the lvresize I did lvchange to deactivate the > LV" > > So what were the exact steps you used ? > Well, it is 02:30 at the moment. So, I'll retrace and post the exact commands later. -- The key to getting good answers is to ask good questions. ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: Lost Mate-panel
On Tue, 05 May 2020 10:37:24 -0700, Samuel Sieb wrote: > It sounds like you started the the upgrade process but it failed part > way through. I think doing a re-install would be the much easier > option, but if you want to keep trying, then we can try a bit more. My bad. I took a guess at "re-install" and got it wrong -- trying to re-do what I had. Can I actually do something like "dnf re-install xyz"?? What do I put for xyz when it's a whole OS?? -- Beartooth Staffwright, Not Quite Clueless Power User Remember I know little (precious little!) of where up is. ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: Lost Mate-panel
On 5/5/20 11:43 AM, Beartooth wrote: On Tue, 05 May 2020 10:37:24 -0700, Samuel Sieb wrote: It sounds like you started the the upgrade process but it failed part way through. I think doing a re-install would be the much easier option, but if you want to keep trying, then we can try a bit more. My bad. I took a guess at "re-install" and got it wrong -- trying to re-do what I had. Can I actually do something like "dnf re-install xyz"?? What do I put for xyz when it's a whole OS?? You get a live image or a net install image and boot from it. ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: Lost Mate-panel
On Tue, 05 May 2020 11:46:18 -0700, Samuel Sieb wrote: > On 5/5/20 11:43 AM, Beartooth wrote: >> On Tue, 05 May 2020 10:37:24 -0700, Samuel Sieb wrote: >> >>> It sounds like you started the the upgrade process but it failed part >>> way through. I think doing a re-install would be the much easier >>> option, but if you want to keep trying, then we can try a bit more. >> >> My bad. I took a guess at "re-install" and got it wrong -- trying >> to re-do what I had. >> >> Can I actually do something like "dnf re-install xyz"?? What do I >> put for xyz when it's a whole OS?? > > You get a live image or a net install image and boot from it. Oh. All right, I now have it booted into F32 Live, with a Mate- terminal open. ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: Lost Mate-panel
On 5/5/20 12:36 PM, Beartooth wrote: On Tue, 05 May 2020 11:46:18 -0700, Samuel Sieb wrote: On 5/5/20 11:43 AM, Beartooth wrote: On Tue, 05 May 2020 10:37:24 -0700, Samuel Sieb wrote: It sounds like you started the the upgrade process but it failed part way through. I think doing a re-install would be the much easier option, but if you want to keep trying, then we can try a bit more. My bad. I took a guess at "re-install" and got it wrong -- trying to re-do what I had. Can I actually do something like "dnf re-install xyz"?? What do I put for xyz when it's a whole OS?? You get a live image or a net install image and boot from it. Oh. All right, I now have it booted into F32 Live, with a Mate- terminal open. I've never use the Mate live boot. Did it have an install option when it started up? If not, check the menus for an install option. ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fixed - Re: F32 Install hangs on Lenovo x140e
I reseated the memory. Sheesh. On 5/5/20 10:18 AM, Robert Moskowitz wrote: I downloaded the F32 Server netinstall CD. I wanted a F32 Workstation netinstall, but I could not find one. :( The system is a Lenovo x140e that I got used on ebay with no HD and only 4GB memory. I pulled an SSD that had F28 on it and added 4GB memory. this system will not boot as is. I put the CD in a USB DVD/CD device, turn on the computer, press F12 for boot menu and select the CD. I get the Install 32 or check media option and select Install. After a bit of time it goes back to the system boot message offering to start F28 (which won't work anyway). What do I do to figure out what is wrong? I pulled an old Lenovo x120e and did the same start up. I got into the install menu for F32, so I don't think it is the CD media. any one have experience with the x140e? Anyone can give me some suggestions? Bob ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org
Is there a F32 workstation Netinstall image
I looked and looked and only found a F32 server Netinstall image. ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: F32 Upgrade error: more space needed on the / filesystem... --live-root ?
dnf is asking for 6G./home has 22G of free space. ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: Is there a F32 workstation Netinstall image
On 5/5/20 1:11 PM, Robert Moskowitz wrote: I looked and looked and only found a F32 server Netinstall image. Use this: https://dl.fedoraproject.org/pub/fedora/linux/releases/32/Everything/x86_64/iso/Fedora-Everything-netinst-x86_64-32-1.6.iso You can choose the workstation option from the install options. ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: F32 Upgrade error: more space needed on the / filesystem... --live-root ?
On 5/5/20 1:19 PM, linux guy wrote: dnf is asking for 6G. /home has 22G of free space. I'm not sure what your point is. I suggested using /home to store the upgrade rpms. Francis suggested you might be able to clear enough space on /, although 6GB is a lot to find. ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: F32 Upgrade error: more space needed on the / filesystem... --live-root ?
I need to resize / regardless of this dnf operation. /home has space to spare. ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: Is there a F32 workstation Netinstall image
On 5/5/20 4:21 PM, Samuel Sieb wrote: On 5/5/20 1:11 PM, Robert Moskowitz wrote: I looked and looked and only found a F32 server Netinstall image. Use this: https://dl.fedoraproject.org/pub/fedora/linux/releases/32/Everything/x86_64/iso/Fedora-Everything-netinst-x86_64-32-1.6.iso You can choose the workstation option from the install options. thank you. that is what I need. Got through the basics, like partitioning like I want and now to software selection and there is Xfce Desktop! Hopefully on my way. ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: F32 Upgrade error: more space needed on the / filesystem... --live-root ?
On 5/5/20 1:43 PM, linux guy wrote: I need to resize / regardless of this dnf operation. /home has space to spare. Then follow the other part of this thread where the instructions for that are. And good luck... ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: F32 Upgrade error: more space needed on the / filesystem... --live-root ?
I've missed those "other instructions". The part I don't understand is doing a lvresize/ lvextend / lvreduce on a live system without losing data. On Tue, May 5, 2020 at 2:56 PM Samuel Sieb wrote: > On 5/5/20 1:43 PM, linux guy wrote: > > > > I need to resize / regardless of this dnf operation. /home has space > > to spare. > > Then follow the other part of this thread where the instructions for > that are. And good luck... > ___ > users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org > To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org > Fedora Code of Conduct: > https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ > List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines > List Archives: > https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org > ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: F32 Upgrade error: more space needed on the / filesystem... --live-root ?
On 05/05/2020 03:40 PM, linux guy wrote: I've missed those "other instructions". The part I don't understand is doing a lvresize/ lvextend / lvreduce on a live system without losing data. Step one: back up anything and everything you wouldn't want to lose. ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: F32 Upgrade error: more space needed on the / filesystem... --live-root ?
On 2020-05-06 05:40, linux guy wrote: > I've missed those "other instructions". The part I don't understand is > doing a lvresize/ lvextend / lvreduce on a live system without losing data. I didn't do it on a "live" system. I booted from the "live" image where those filesystems are not being used. Do you still need precise details on what I did? I can do that after a bit. -- The key to getting good answers is to ask good questions. ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: F32 Upgrade error: more space needed on the / filesystem... --live-root ?
Done that. Now what ? ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: F32 Upgrade error: more space needed on the / filesystem... --live-root ?
I would appreciate them, Ed, just to make sure I'm not missing something. No rush. Don't get up early. ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: Is there a F32 workstation Netinstall image
On 5/5/20 3:11 PM, Robert Moskowitz wrote: > I looked and looked and only found a F32 server Netinstall image. here: https://alt.fedoraproject.org/ it says "N/ote: You can select different editions of Fedora to install with this netinstall. You are not limited to Server edition only."/ i missed that at first too. p.s. i see later in this thread that you used the Everything image. That's cool too, but probably more selecting. Whatever works. ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org
F32, mDNS, and nsswitch.conf
I've been using Fedora on my laptop for a few years now, and on a newly built desktop for since just last summer. I've never had an issue upgrading, but I only recently became aware of the recommended post- install steps. https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/quick-docs/dnf-system-upgrade/ So this time, after upgrading to Fedora 32 I followed the guide. When I was looking through the results of rpmconf -a, I chose to install the newer config files as I hadn't made any local changes, except in sshd_config. After the upgrade, it turned out I could no longer print from my desktop. My printer was discovered via mDNS and configured automatically in the past, it was really nice actually. I tried on my laptop as well and had the same result. I basically ignored it for a few days, installing updates and seeing if it was fixed, but it never was. Monday I had a bunch of printing to do for my kid's "remote learning" school assignments so I figured I'd dig into it. It turns out mdns4_minimal had been removed from host resolution in nsswitch.conf. I restored the nsswitch.conf.bak on both machines and my printer is back in business. I'm not sure if this is a bug? Was it removed for a reason or should I report it? Maybe it has been gone for a while now, and I've just been bringing the config forward. I suspect whatever package adds mDNS functionality also adds the entry to the default config and then I resotred the default back so this is basically user error. ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: F32, mDNS, and nsswitch.conf
On Tue, 05 May 2020 19:48:22 -0400 Kevin Becker wrote: > It turns out > mdns4_minimal had been removed from host resolution in nsswitch.conf. > I restored the nsswitch.conf.bak on both machines and my printer is > back in business. Files like nsswitch.conf seem to be configured by the new authselect stuff, though God knows which profile you need to select to make it work. (Why mdns4_minimal helps, I have no idea, it usually is what screws up my systems and I have to take it out to make things work). ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: F32 Upgrade error: more space needed on the / filesystem... --live-root ?
On 2020-05-06 06:12, linux guy wrote: > I would appreciate them, Ed, just to make sure I'm not missing something. > No rush. Don't get up early. I do normally get up early. But had some other things to take care of first. In my case I don't have separate / and /home. So, I am going to decrease / and increase swap. Decreasing is more dangerous than Increasing. You'll be decreasing /home and increasing /. This is the system normally booted before modification. [egreshko@f31m ~]$ df -t ext4 Filesystem 1K-blocks Used Available Use% Mounted on /dev/mapper/fedora_localhost--live-root 17410832 7037660 9465704 43% / /dev/vda1 999320 263436 667072 29% /boot [egreshko@f31m ~]$ swapon NAME TYPE SIZE USED PRIO /dev/dm-1 partition 2G 0B -2 [egreshko@f31m ~]$ sudo lvs LV VG Attr LSize Pool Origin Data% Meta% Move Log Cpy%Sync Convert root fedora_localhost-live -wi-ao <17.00g swap fedora_localhost-live -wi-ao 2.00g My goal is to reduce / by 2 GB and add to swap. So, I then boot from the F31 Mate Spin image and do the following. [root@localhost-live ~]# e2fsck -ff /dev/fedora_localhost-live/root e2fsck 1.45.3 (14-Jul-2019) Pass 1: Checking inodes, blocks, and sizes Pass 2: Checking directory structure Pass 3: Checking directory connectivity Pass 4: Checking reference counts Pass 5: Checking group summary information /dev/fedora_localhost-live/root: 226041/1114112 files (0.2% non-contiguous), 1855851/4455424 blocks I now resize the filesystem to 15GB. Failure to resize the FS will result in disaster. [root@localhost-live ~]# resize2fs /dev/fedora_localhost-live/root 15G resize2fs 1.45.3 (14-Jul-2019) Resizing the filesystem on /dev/fedora_localhost-live/root to 3932160 (4k) blocks. The filesystem on /dev/fedora_localhost-live/root is now 3932160 (4k) blocks long. Make the LV inactive [root@localhost-live ~]# lvchange -a n /dev/fedora_localhost-live/root Now, shrink the LVbut not as much as the FS. I can't recall the reason for thisbut that is what I've done in the past. 0.5 difference is probably excessive but [root@localhost-live ~]# lvresize /dev/fedora_localhost-live/root -L 15.5GB Size of logical volume fedora_localhost-live/root changed from <17.00 GiB (4351 extents) to 15.50 GiB (3968 extents). Logical volume fedora_localhost-live/root successfully resized. Activate the LV [root@localhost-live ~]# lvchange -a y /dev/fedora_localhost-live/root And run a check on the new size [root@localhost-live ~]# e2fsck -ff /dev/fedora_localhost-live/root e2fsck 1.45.3 (14-Jul-2019) Pass 1: Checking inodes, blocks, and sizes Pass 2: Checking directory structure Pass 3: Checking directory connectivity Pass 4: Checking reference counts Pass 5: Checking group summary information /dev/fedora_localhost-live/root: 226041/983040 files (0.3% non-contiguous), 1846611/3932160 blocks Then I want to increase swap. But I intentionally make it too big to find out what is really available. This is where you'd increase /. [root@localhost-live ~]# lvresize /dev/fedora_localhost-live/swap -L 4GB Insufficient free space: 512 extents needed, but only 383 available So then I do this. In this case I'm adding extents rather than giving a specific size. [root@localhost-live ~]# lvresize /dev/fedora_localhost-live/swap -l +383 Size of logical volume fedora_localhost-live/swap changed from 2.00 GiB (512 extents) to <3.50 GiB (895 extents). Logical volume fedora_localhost-live/swap successfully resized. I then boot normally and see. [egreshko@f31m ~]$ df -t ext4 Filesystem 1K-blocks Used Available Use% Mounted on /dev/mapper/fedora_localhost--live-root 15350728 7033772 7514144 49% / /dev/vda1 999320 263436 667072 29% /boot [egreshko@f31m ~]$ sudo lvs LV VG Attr LSize Pool Origin Data% Meta% Move Log Cpy%Sync Convert root fedora_localhost-live -wi-ao 15.50g swap fedora_localhost-live -wi-ao <3.50g [egreshko@f31m ~]$ sudo swapon NAME TYPE SIZE USED PRIO /dev/dm-1 partition 2G 0B -2 So, / is now smaller. But I have to fix swap manually. This wouldn't be needed with /home Originally root@f31m ~]# swapon NAME TYPE SIZE USED PRIO /dev/dm-1 partition 2G 0B -2 Turn it off [root@f31m ~]# swapoff /dev/dm-1 Remake it [root@f31m ~]# mkswap /dev/dm-1 mkswap: /dev/dm-1: warning: wiping old swap signature. Setting up swapspace version 1, size = 3.5 GiB (3753897984 bytes) no label, UUID=bfc61bdb-3252-42e1-9b4c-e72b154c6c30 And now the new size [root@f31m ~]# swapon /dev/dm-1 [root@f31m ~]# swapon NAME TYPE SIZE USED PRIO /dev/dm-1 partition 3.5G 0B -2 -- The key to getting good answers i
Re: F32 Upgrade error: more space needed on the / filesystem... --live-root ?
On 2020-05-06 08:07, Ed Greshko wrote: > On 2020-05-06 06:12, linux guy wrote: >> I would appreciate them, Ed, just to make sure I'm not missing something. >> No rush. Don't get up early. > I do normally get up early. But had some other things to take care of first. > > In my case I don't have separate / and /home. So, I am going to decrease / > and increase swap. > Decreasing is more dangerous than Increasing. You'll be decreasing /home and > increasing /. > > This is the system normally booted before modification. > > [egreshko@f31m ~]$ df -t ext4 > Filesystem 1K-blocks Used Available Use% > Mounted on > /dev/mapper/fedora_localhost--live-root 17410832 7037660 9465704 43% / > /dev/vda1 999320 263436 667072 29% /boot > > [egreshko@f31m ~]$ swapon > NAME TYPE SIZE USED PRIO > /dev/dm-1 partition 2G 0B -2 > > [egreshko@f31m ~]$ sudo lvs > LV VG Attr LSize Pool Origin Data% Meta% > Move Log Cpy%Sync Convert > root fedora_localhost-live -wi-ao <17.00g > > swap fedora_localhost-live -wi-ao 2.00g > > My goal is to reduce / by 2 GB and add to swap. So, I then boot from the F31 > Mate Spin image and > do the following. > > [root@localhost-live ~]# e2fsck -ff /dev/fedora_localhost-live/root > e2fsck 1.45.3 (14-Jul-2019) > Pass 1: Checking inodes, blocks, and sizes > Pass 2: Checking directory structure > Pass 3: Checking directory connectivity > Pass 4: Checking reference counts > Pass 5: Checking group summary information > /dev/fedora_localhost-live/root: 226041/1114112 files (0.2% non-contiguous), > 1855851/4455424 blocks > > I now resize the filesystem to 15GB. Failure to resize the FS will result in > disaster. > > [root@localhost-live ~]# resize2fs /dev/fedora_localhost-live/root 15G > resize2fs 1.45.3 (14-Jul-2019) > Resizing the filesystem on /dev/fedora_localhost-live/root to 3932160 (4k) > blocks. > The filesystem on /dev/fedora_localhost-live/root is now 3932160 (4k) blocks > long. > > Make the LV inactive > > [root@localhost-live ~]# lvchange -a n /dev/fedora_localhost-live/root > > Now, shrink the LVbut not as much as the FS. > I can't recall the reason for thisbut that is what I've done in the past. > 0.5 difference is probably excessive > but > > [root@localhost-live ~]# lvresize /dev/fedora_localhost-live/root -L 15.5GB > Size of logical volume fedora_localhost-live/root changed from <17.00 GiB > (4351 extents) to 15.50 GiB (3968 extents). > Logical volume fedora_localhost-live/root successfully resized. > > Activate the LV > > [root@localhost-live ~]# lvchange -a y /dev/fedora_localhost-live/root > > And run a check on the new size > > [root@localhost-live ~]# e2fsck -ff /dev/fedora_localhost-live/root > e2fsck 1.45.3 (14-Jul-2019) > Pass 1: Checking inodes, blocks, and sizes > Pass 2: Checking directory structure > Pass 3: Checking directory connectivity > Pass 4: Checking reference counts > Pass 5: Checking group summary information > /dev/fedora_localhost-live/root: 226041/983040 files (0.3% non-contiguous), > 1846611/3932160 blocks > > Then I want to increase swap. But I intentionally make it too big to find > out what is really available. > This is where you'd increase /. > > [root@localhost-live ~]# lvresize /dev/fedora_localhost-live/swap -L 4GB > Insufficient free space: 512 extents needed, but only 383 available > > So then I do this. In this case I'm adding extents rather than giving a > specific size. > > [root@localhost-live ~]# lvresize /dev/fedora_localhost-live/swap -l +383 > Size of logical volume fedora_localhost-live/swap changed from 2.00 GiB > (512 extents) to <3.50 GiB (895 extents). > Logical volume fedora_localhost-live/swap successfully resized. Oh, forgot to add Here you'd also have to resize2fs to give more space to / That's not needed in the case of swap as the mkswap fixes it. -- The key to getting good answers is to ask good questions. ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: F32 Upgrade error: more space needed on the / filesystem... --live-root ?
On 2020-05-06 08:19, Ed Greshko wrote: > Oh, forgot to add > > Here you'd also have to resize2fs to give more space to / > > That's not needed in the case of swap as the mkswap fixes it. If you need it I could create a VM to more closely match your filesystem layout and run the commands in much the same way you'd need to. It would just take me a bit of time. -- The key to getting good answers is to ask good questions. ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: F32, mDNS, and nsswitch.conf
Well, my printer was autodiscovered and configured via mDNS, so with the mnds4_minimal entry missing, it was not able to resolve the name. I could've gone an manually added it by IP address or a static DNS name but I liked the simplicity of it working "automagically" and I never remember the exact syntax I need and whether to set it up an IPP or HTTP or LPR printer. I've had issues with the mdns4_minimal entry in the past when accessing work resources over VPN, presumably because we have a .local Active Directory domain at work and mDNS uses .local as well. IIRC I had to move the mdns entry further back in the list to make it work, but that was a few years ago and probably on ubuntu. I never had to mess with it in Fedora until now. On Tue, 2020-05-05 at 19:55 -0400, Tom Horsley wrote: > On Tue, 05 May 2020 19:48:22 -0400 > Kevin Becker wrote: > > > It turns out > > mdns4_minimal had been removed from host resolution in > > nsswitch.conf. > > I restored the nsswitch.conf.bak on both machines and my printer is > > back in business. > > Files like nsswitch.conf seem to be configured by the new > authselect stuff, though God knows which profile you need > to select to make it work. (Why mdns4_minimal helps, I have > no idea, it usually is what screws up my systems and I > have to take it out to make things work). > ___ > users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org > To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org > Fedora Code of Conduct: > https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ > List Guidelines: > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines > List Archives: > https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: FreeIPA Users cannot log in via GDM after upgrade to Fedora 32
On Mon, 2020-05-04 at 18:10 -0700, Thomas Letherby wrote: > > Any suggestions of where to look next? I tried looking up the errors > that I could see, but I didn't see anything that fit quite what I was > seeing. In FreeIPA, make sure your HBAC rule for your desktops include the login services, "gdm" and "gdm-password". What you're describing sounds like what I was experiencing in Fedora a few releases ago. I fixed it when I realized that "gdm" was one of the HBAC services pre-defined in IPA and I didn't have it included in my list of allowed services. -- Ranbir ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org
F32 - terrible background
Ugh. And I had the nerve to complain about the F30 background. This overly blue and bright background has to go!!! :( ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org
Problems and errors upgrading F31 to F32
I've upgraded from F29 > F30 and F30 > F31 without a hint of a problem. Now I'm seeing a crapload of errors trying to upgrade F31 > F32: # dnf system-upgrade download --releasever=32Before you continue ensure that your system is fully upgraded by running "dnf --refresh upgrade". Do you want to continue [y/N]: yAdobe Systems Incorporated 9.0 kB/s | 2.9 kB 00:00Copr repo for ZFS-EL8 owned by kni 8.3 kB/s | 3.3 kB 00:00Copr repo for ZFS-EL8 owned by kni 70 kB/s | 51 kB 00:00Fedora 32 openh264 (From Cisco) - x86_64 477 B/s | 543 B 00:01Fedora Modular 32 - x86_64 15 kB/s | 14 kB 00:00Fedora Modular 32 - x86_64 - Updates 14 kB/s | 11 kB 00:00Fedora Modular 32 - x86_64 - Updates 54 kB/s | 150 kB 00:02Fedora 32 - x86_64 - Updates 15 kB/s | 13 kB 00:00Fedora 32 - x86_64 - Updates 289 kB/s | 1.1 MB 00:03Fedora 32 - x86_64 24 kB/s | 14 kB 00:00google- chrome 3.8 kB/s | 1.3 kB 00:00google- chrome 6.3 kB/s | 4.3 kB 00:00RPM Fusion for Fedora 32 - Free - Updates 3.1 kB/s | 3.0 kB 00:00RPM Fusion for Fedora 32 - Free 4.1 kB/s | 3.0 kB 00:00RPM Fusion for Fedora 32 - Nonfree - Updates 3.6 kB/s | 2.9 kB 00:00RPM Fusion for Fedora 32 - Nonfree 3.7 kB/s | 3.3 kB 00:00Modular dependency problems: Problem 1: conflicting requests - nothing provides module(platform:f31) needed by module gimp:2.10:3120191106095052:f636be4b-0.x86_64 Problem 2: conflicting requests - nothing provides module(platform:f31) needed by module meson:latest:3120191009081836:dc56099c-0.x86_64 Problem 3: conflicting requests - nothing provides module(platform:f31) needed by module ninja:latest:3120190304180949:f636be4b-0.x86_64Error: Problem 1: package php-recode-7.3.17-1.fc31.x86_64 requires php-common(x86-64) = 7.3.17-1.fc31, but none of the providers can be installed - php- common-7.3.17-1.fc31.x86_64 does not belong to a distupgrade repository - problem with installed package php-recode-7.3.17- 1.fc31.x86_64 Problem 2: package python2-beautifulsoup4-4.9.0- 1.fc31.noarch requires python2-lxml, but none of the providers can be installed - python2-lxml-4.4.0-1.fc31.x86_64 does not belong to a distupgrade repository - problem with installed package python2- beautifulsoup4-4.9.0-1.fc31.noarch Problem 3: package python2-twisted- 19.2.1-6.fc31.x86_64 requires python2.7dist(automat) >= 0.3, but none of the providers can be installed - python2-Automat-0.7.0- 4.fc31.noarch does not belong to a distupgrade repository - problem with installed package python2-twisted-19.2.1-6.fc31.x86_64 Problem 4: package system-config-bind-4.0.15-16.fc29.noarch requires gnome- python2-canvas, but none of the providers can be installed - gnome- python2-canvas-2.28.1-30.fc31.x86_64 does not belong to a distupgrade repository - problem with installed package system-config-bind-4.0.15- 16.fc29.noarch Problem 5: package system-config-httpd-5:1.5.5- 18.fc31.noarch requires gnome-python2-gnome, but none of the providers can be installed - gnome-python2-gnome-2.28.1-30.fc31.x86_64 does not belong to a distupgrade repository - problem with installed package system-config-httpd-5:1.5.5-18.fc31.noa
Re: F32 - terrible background
On 2020-05-06 09:35, Robert Moskowitz wrote: > And I had the nerve to complain about the F30 background. > > This overly blue and bright background has to go!!! You can change the default. -- The key to getting good answers is to ask good questions. ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: F32 - terrible background
On 5/5/20 9:44 PM, Ed Greshko wrote: On 2020-05-06 09:35, Robert Moskowitz wrote: And I had the nerve to complain about the F30 background. This overly blue and bright background has to go!!! You can change the default. Yes and no. You can change it, but you need something to change it to... Still moving all my stuff over. Eventually I will get to my pic folder. ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: F32 - terrible background
On 2020-05-06 09:52, Robert Moskowitz wrote: > > > On 5/5/20 9:44 PM, Ed Greshko wrote: >> On 2020-05-06 09:35, Robert Moskowitz wrote: >>> And I had the nerve to complain about the F30 background. >>> >>> This overly blue and bright background has to go!!! >> You can change the default. >> > Yes and no. > > You can change it, but you need something to change it to... > > Still moving all my stuff over. Eventually I will get to my pic folder. > > There are other images available which can be an acceptable alternative before you're done moving things. -- The key to getting good answers is to ask good questions. ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: Problems and errors upgrading F31 to F32
On 2020-05-06 09:44, Robert G (Doc) Savage via users wrote: > I've upgraded from F29 > F30 and F30 > F31 without a hint of a problem. Now > I'm seeing a crapload of errors trying to upgrade F31 > F32: > > # dnf system-upgrade download --releasever=32 > Before you continue ensure that your system is fully upgraded by running "dnf > --refresh upgrade". Do you want to continue [y/N]: y > Adobe Systems Incorporated > 9.0 kB/s | 2.9 > kB 00:00 > Copr repo for ZFS-EL8 owned by kni > 8.3 kB/s | 3.3 > kB 00:00 > Copr repo for ZFS-EL8 owned by kni > 70 kB/s | 51 > kB 00:00 > Fedora 32 openh264 (From Cisco) - x86_64 > 477 B/s | 543 > B 00:01 > Fedora Modular 32 - x86_64 > 15 kB/s | 14 > kB 00:00 > Fedora Modular 32 - x86_64 - Updates > 14 kB/s | 11 > kB 00:00 > Fedora Modular 32 - x86_64 - Updates > 54 kB/s | 150 > kB 00:02 > Fedora 32 - x86_64 - Updates > 15 kB/s | 13 > kB 00:00 > Fedora 32 - x86_64 - Updates > 289 kB/s | 1.1 > MB 00:03 > Fedora 32 - x86_64 > 24 kB/s | 14 > kB 00:00 > google-chrome > 3.8 kB/s | 1.3 > kB 00:00 > google-chrome > 6.3 kB/s | 4.3 > kB 00:00 > RPM Fusion for Fedora 32 - Free - Updates > 3.1 kB/s | 3.0 > kB 00:00 > RPM Fusion for Fedora 32 - Free > 4.1 kB/s | 3.0 > kB 00:00 > RPM Fusion for Fedora 32 - Nonfree - Updates > 3.6 kB/s | 2.9 > kB 00:00 > RPM Fusion for Fedora 32 - Nonfree > 3.7 kB/s | 3.3 > kB 00:00 > Modular dependency problems: > Problem 1: conflicting requests > - nothing provides module(platform:f31) needed by module > gimp:2.10:3120191106095052:f636be4b-0.x86_64 > Problem 2: conflicting requests > - nothing provides module(platform:f31) needed by module > meson:latest:3120191009081836:dc56099c-0.x86_64 > Problem 3: conflicting requests > - nothing provides module(platform:f31) needed by module > ninja:latest:3120190304180949:f636be4b-0.x86_64 I believe those module errors get resolved later in the process. These are more the issue... > Error: > Problem 1: package php-recode-7.3.17-1.fc31.x86_64 requires > php-common(x86-64) = 7.3.17-1.fc31, but none of the providers can be installed > - php-common-7.3.17-1.fc31.x86_64 does not belong to a distupgrade > repository > - problem with installed package php-recode-7.3.17-1.fc31.x86_64 > The "does not belong to a distupgrade repository" is most likely the problem area. If you do "dnf info php-common" what repo does it show as belonging to? I'm guessing it will be one of the Copr repos. Try disabling those repos when doing the upgrades. -- The key to getting good answers is to ask good questions. ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: F32 - terrible background
On 5/5/20 9:55 PM, Ed Greshko wrote: On 2020-05-06 09:52, Robert Moskowitz wrote: On 5/5/20 9:44 PM, Ed Greshko wrote: On 2020-05-06 09:35, Robert Moskowitz wrote: And I had the nerve to complain about the F30 background. This overly blue and bright background has to go!!! You can change the default. Yes and no. You can change it, but you need something to change it to... Still moving all my stuff over. Eventually I will get to my pic folder. There are other images available which can be an acceptable alternative before you're done moving things. Oh? Where? The images directory only has the default background. ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: F32 - terrible background
On 2020-05-06 10:06, Robert Moskowitz wrote: > > > On 5/5/20 9:55 PM, Ed Greshko wrote: >> On 2020-05-06 09:52, Robert Moskowitz wrote: >>> >>> >>> On 5/5/20 9:44 PM, Ed Greshko wrote: On 2020-05-06 09:35, Robert Moskowitz wrote: > And I had the nerve to complain about the F30 background. > > This overly blue and bright background has to go!!! You can change the default. >>> Yes and no. >>> >>> You can change it, but you need something to change it to... >>> >>> Still moving all my stuff over. Eventually I will get to my pic folder. >>> >>> >> >> There are other images available which can be an acceptable alternative >> before you're >> done moving things. > > Oh? Where? > > The images directory only has the default background. > Well, on my default F32 Workstation installed in a VM with no extra packages installed. If I right click on the background after I login and select "Change Background" I'm presented with a group of options. -- The key to getting good answers is to ask good questions. ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: F32 - terrible background
On 5/5/20 10:11 PM, Ed Greshko wrote: On 2020-05-06 10:06, Robert Moskowitz wrote: On 5/5/20 9:55 PM, Ed Greshko wrote: On 2020-05-06 09:52, Robert Moskowitz wrote: On 5/5/20 9:44 PM, Ed Greshko wrote: On 2020-05-06 09:35, Robert Moskowitz wrote: And I had the nerve to complain about the F30 background. This overly blue and bright background has to go!!! You can change the default. Yes and no. You can change it, but you need something to change it to... Still moving all my stuff over. Eventually I will get to my pic folder. There are other images available which can be an acceptable alternative before you're done moving things. Oh? Where? The images directory only has the default background. Well, on my default F32 Workstation installed in a VM with no extra packages installed. If I right click on the background after I login and select "Change Background" I'm presented with a group of options. I don't have a right click on an empty workspace (on the background) that gives me "Change Background" Oh, perhaps because I am using Xfce? I do have Desktop Setting which has a background tab which only offers the default background. hmmm. How to get the backgrounds from some other desktop? ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: F32 - terrible background
On 2020-05-06 10:24, Robert Moskowitz wrote: > I don't have a right click on an empty workspace (on the background) that > gives me "Change Background" > > Oh, perhaps because I am using Xfce? > > I do have Desktop Setting which has a background tab which only offers the > default background. > > hmmm. How to get the backgrounds from some other desktop? It would have been helpful to mention Xfce. Anyway, you could do... dnf install schroedinger-cat-backgrounds-extras-xfce And then point the background tab to the directory /usr/share/backgrounds/schroedinger-cat/extras and there will be a group of images to pick from -- The key to getting good answers is to ask good questions. ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: Problems and errors upgrading F31 to F32
On Wed, 2020-05-06 at 09:56 +0800, Ed Greshko wrote: > On 2020-05-06 09:44, Robert G (Doc) Savage via users wrote: > > I've upgraded from F29 > F30 and F30 > F31 without a hint of a > > problem. Now I'm seeing a crapload of errors trying to upgrade F31 > > > F32: > > > > # dnf system-upgrade download --releasever=32 > > Before you continue ensure that your system is fully upgraded by > > running "dnf --refresh upgrade". Do you want to continue [y/N]: y > > Adobe Systems > > Incorporated > > 9.0 > > kB/s | 2.9 kB 00:00 > > Copr repo for ZFS-EL8 owned by > > kni > >8.3 kB/s | 3.3 > > kB 00:00 > > Copr repo for ZFS-EL8 owned by > > kni > > 70 kB/s | 51 > > kB 00:00 > > Fedora 32 openh264 (From Cisco) - > > x86_64 > > 477 B/s | > > 543 B 00:01 > > Fedora Modular 32 - > > x86_64 > >15 kB/s > > | 14 kB 00:00 > > Fedora Modular 32 - x86_64 - > > Updates > > 14 kB/s | 11 > > kB 00:00 > > Fedora Modular 32 - x86_64 - > > Updates > > 54 kB/s | 150 > > kB 00:02 > > Fedora 32 - x86_64 - > > Updates > > 15 kB/s | 13 > > kB 00:00 > > Fedora 32 - x86_64 - > > Updates > > 289 kB/s | 1.1 > > MB 00:03 > > Fedora 32 - > > x86_64 > >24 > > kB/s | 14 kB 00:00 > > google- > > chrome > > > > 3.8 kB/s | 1.3 kB 00:00 > > google- > > chrome > > > > 6.3 kB/s | 4.3 kB 00:00 > > RPM Fusion for Fedora 32 - Free - > > Updates > > 3.1 kB/s | 3.0 > > kB 00:00 > > RPM Fusion for Fedora 32 - > > Free > >4.1 kB/s | 3.0 > > kB 00:00 > > RPM Fusion for Fedora 32 - Nonfree - > > Updates > > 3.6 kB/s | 2.9 > > kB 00:00 > > RPM Fusion for Fedora 32 - > > Nonfree > >3.7 kB/s | 3.3 > > kB 00:00 > > Modular dependency problems: > > Problem 1: conflicting requests > > - nothing provides module(platform:f31) needed by module > > gimp:2.10:3120191106095052:f636be4b-0.x86_64 > > Problem 2: conflicting requests > > - nothing provides module(platform:f31) needed by module > > meson:latest:3120191009081836:dc56099c-0.x86_64 > > Problem 3: conflicting requests > > - nothing provides module(platform:f31) needed by module > > ninja:latest:3120190304180949:f636be4b-0.x86_64 > > I believe those module errors get resolved later in the process. > > These are more the issue... > > Error: > > Problem 1: package php-recode-7.3.17-1.fc31.x86_64 requires php- > > common(x86-64) = 7.3.17-1.fc31, but none of the providers can be > > installed > > - php-common-7.3.17-1.fc31.x86_64 does not belong to a > > distupgrade repository > > - problem with installed package php-recode-7.3.17-1.fc31.x86_64 > > > > The "does not belong to a distupgrade repository" is most likely the > problem area. > > If you do "dnf info php-common" what repo does it show as belonging > to? > I'm guessing it will be one of the Copr repos. > > Try disabling those repos when doing the upgrades. Ed, Running "dnf info " against each of the packages listed as a Problem returns either: Repository : @System From repo: fedora or Repository : @System From repo: updates My take is that they're genuine Fedora packages and not COPR. --Doc Savage Fairview Heights, IL _
Re: Problems and errors upgrading F31 to F32
On 2020-05-06 12:04, Robert G (Doc) Savage via users wrote: > Ed, > > Running "dnf info " against each of the packages listed as a > Problem returns either: > > Repository : @System > From repo: fedora > > or > > Repository : @System > From repo: updates > > My take is that they're genuine Fedora packages and not COPR. How about "dnf info php-recode"? -- The key to getting good answers is to ask good questions. ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: Problems and errors upgrading F31 to F32
On 5/5/20 6:44 PM, Robert G (Doc) Savage via users wrote: I've upgraded from F29 > F30 and F30 > F31 without a hint of a problem. Now I'm seeing a crapload of errors trying to upgrade F31 > F32: # dnf system-upgrade download --releasever=32 Problem 1: conflicting requests - nothing provides module(platform:f31) needed by module gimp:2.10:3120191106095052:f636be4b-0.x86_64 As Ed mentioned, these will end up getting resolved or if you want to remove those messages ahead of time, you can run "dnf module reset \*" which is what will happen anyway. - gnome-python2-canvas-2.28.1-30.fc31.x86_64 does not belong to a distupgrade repository Problem 5: package system-config-httpd-5:1.5.5-18.fc31.noarch requires gnome-python2-gnome, but none of the providers can be installed - package sslstrip-0.9-14.fc29.noarch requires python2-twisted, but none of the providers can be installed These are probably some of the retired python2 packages. I've tried adding '--skip-broken', but it didn't change anything. I find "--allowerasing" generally works better. ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: dnfdragora freezing, pausing, crashing
On 2020-05-04 04:26, Steven Usdansky via users wrote: The current version of dnfdragora has been crashing for me for about a week. Not wanting to investigate further, I downgraded to dnfdragora-1.1.1-6.fc32.noarch.rpm which still works ___ Thank you, Steven. I'll give that a shot and report back. ~~Richard ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org
