Fedora 24: LibreOffice Quickstartet
Hi, I really miss this quickstarter of LibreOffice in Fedora 24 (otherwise an excellent distribution). Is there any possibility to get it besides that of installing the packages from the website of LibreOffice? With Fedora 23 I experienced some issues with this method (menu freezing, menu disappearing, writer ignoring save format, etc.), I wouldn't try it again. Google search didn't bring much so far. Thanks in advance, -- Tibor I use OpenSource! It matters. -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/users@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
Re: bad results from adding samsung v-nand SSD 950 PRO M.2 to ASUS laptop
On Sun, 17 Jul 2016, Robert P. J. Day wrote: > yesterday, i popped open my ASUS G752VL-DH71 to see two available > slots for SSD drives, both clearly labelled "PCIE only", so i > inserted a new samsung 950 PRO in slot 1, closed it up and booted > and (reproducing from scribbling on some paper, just the first bit): > > ata1.00: failed to enable AA (error_mask=0x4) > ata1.00: revalidation failed > > etc, etc, at which point it finally dropped me into an emergency > shell. > > i didn't have time to debug so i just removed it and got back to > work, but is there something i'm forgetting here? here's the samsung > page for that drive: > > http://www.samsung.com/semiconductor/minisite/ssd/product/consumer/950pro.html > > thoughts? like i said, i did not invest a lot of time trying to track > this down as i have way too much to do, but if there's something > stupid i've done, it would be good to know. i'm following up on an earlier post of mine, still looking for advice. someone earlier suggested googling for "M.2 PCI-E adapter", but this is a laptop, not a desktop, so i have no idea what the value of an adapter would be. decent pics are in this article: http://edgeup.asus.com/2016/01/19/rogs-g752-gaming-laptop-allows-easy-memory-and-storage-upgrades/ where the 4th pic down shows the two SSD slots clearly marked "PCIE ONLY". that article states: "As the silk-screened label indicates, M.2 compatibility is limited to PCI Express SSDs. PCIe drives come in one of two flavors—AHCI or NVM Express—and the G752 works with both of them. However, it doesn’t support M.2 drives based on the Serial ATA standard. Those drives are too slow to take advantage of the copious bandwidth on tap, so there’s little point to running them in a laptop like this." the SSD i tried is described here: http://www.samsung.com/semiconductor/minisite/ssd/product/consumer/950pro.html and the "specifications" tab reads: INTERFACE PCIe 3.0 x4 (up to 32 Gb/s) NVMe 1.1 so it sure seems like i should be able to use that SSD. but, as you can read above, my first attempt did not end well. am i missing something? is support for that device built into the stock fedora kernel as it comes from red hat? (i just assumed it was, perhaps i was being optimistic. would this need standard pci-e support?) is anyone else using this setup? with what SSD drive? and did it just work out of the box? i'm open to suggestions. more in a bit ... rday -- Robert P. J. Day Ottawa, Ontario, CANADA http://crashcourse.ca Twitter: http://twitter.com/rpjday LinkedIn: http://ca.linkedin.com/in/rpjday -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/users@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
Re: bad results from adding samsung v-nand SSD 950 PRO M.2 to ASUS laptop
On Tue, 16 Aug 2016, Robert P. J. Day wrote: > On Sun, 17 Jul 2016, Robert P. J. Day wrote: > > > yesterday, i popped open my ASUS G752VL-DH71 to see two available > > slots for SSD drives, both clearly labelled "PCIE only", so i > > inserted a new samsung 950 PRO in slot 1, closed it up and booted > > and (reproducing from scribbling on some paper, just the first bit): > > > > ata1.00: failed to enable AA (error_mask=0x4) > > ata1.00: revalidation failed > > > > etc, etc, at which point it finally dropped me into an emergency > > shell. > > > > i didn't have time to debug so i just removed it and got back to > > work, but is there something i'm forgetting here? here's the samsung > > page for that drive: > > > > http://www.samsung.com/semiconductor/minisite/ssd/product/consumer/950pro.html > > > > thoughts? like i said, i did not invest a lot of time trying to track > > this down as i have way too much to do, but if there's something > > stupid i've done, it would be good to know. ... snip ... a little more digging, and i ran across this: https://rog.asus.com/forum/showthread.php?79590-Issue-with-M-2-SSD-in-ASUS-ROG-GL752VW "What SSD are you using? I know that there is an incompatibility between the Samsung Pro 950 and the G752 series. Ive been able to get it to work but with a few issues." g ... so the very SSD i purchase turns out to be incompatible. drat. however, apparently, there are a couple others that will work: http://www.amazon.com/Samsung-SM951-256GB-AHCI-MZHPV256HDGL-0/dp/B00VELD92U http://www.amazon.com/Samsung-SM951-512GB-AHCI-MZHPV512HDGL-0/dp/B00VELDBJ6 so, maybe i'll take a chance. rday -- Robert P. J. Day Ottawa, Ontario, CANADA http://crashcourse.ca Twitter: http://twitter.com/rpjday LinkedIn: http://ca.linkedin.com/in/rpjday -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/users@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
Installed by dependency or not
Hi folks, how to determine whether a packet was installed by dependency or by an explicit "dnf install ..."? Thx in adv, Frank -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/users@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
Re: Thunderbird add-on
The quick / legit away around that is use dev or aurora channel versions which will still allow `Install from file' Tim: > Allegedly, on or about 15 August 2016, geo.inbox.ignored sent: >> yes, iirc, in some of my previous versions of TB = Thunderbird, there >> were paint brushes. never could understand what was significant. > > Reminds of those dopey buttons on modern video games. You're supposed > to remember special functions assigned to buttons with triangles and > squares, or different colours. No logic to them. > >> something to be aware of, mozilla devs are on a witch hunt and intend >> to code later versions to no accept any add-ons that do not come from >> their site and stamp of approval. > > I'm not surprised by this, seems like all major software houses are > going down the route of only allowing signed/authorised packages, to try > and put an end to malware (of which there's scads of). > > Anti-virus, and other anti-malware, does not work. There's plenty of > evidence of that. People don't install it, don't run it, don't update > it, ignore its warnings, and install dodgy crap by themselves (whether > by carelessness or stupidity - such as piracy-related hackware). About > the only way to stop the clueless is make it next to impossible to > install something that hasn't been (allegedly) vetted before release. > > signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/users@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
Re: FIXED Re: MSI
OK, so, have you been able to install the Nvidia driver NVIDIA-Linux-x86-346.59.run On 08/15/2016 02:09 PM, Patrick Dupre wrote: On 08/15/2016 05:25 AM, Patrick Dupre wrote: Hello, What is strange is that I can boot Fedora 24 (DVD Server install) vmlinuz initrd=initrd.img inst.stage2=hd:LABEL=Fedora-S-dvd-x86_64-24 nomodeset but I cannot boot Fedora-Workstation-Live 24 (x86_64) with /images/pxeboot/vmlinuz initrd=/images/pxeboot/initrd.img root=live:UUID=. rd.live.image nomodeset It seems a graphics issue Actually, I am not sure, when I try to boot the Fedora-Workstation-Live 24 nomodeset is not a good option: the screen flashes. Thus, it seems better to remove this option, then the booting process is stucked at: Started User Manager for UID 1000 Actually, when it should switch to the graphic mode! Finally, it works if I boot with: nouveau.modeset=0 vga=0x31B === Patrick DUPRÉ | | email:pdu...@gmx.com Laboratoire de Physico-Chimie de l'Atmosphère | | Université du Littoral-Côte d'Opale | | Tel. (33)-(0)3 28 23 76 12 | | Fax: 03 28 65 82 44 189A, avenue Maurice Schumann | | 59140 Dunkerque, France === Sent: Saturday, August 13, 2016 at 10:15 PM From: jd1008 To:users@lists.fedoraproject.org Subject: Re: MSI Hi Patrick, Not sure what exactly you did to make it work. Please elaborate which of tghe many suggestions you received, worked. Cheers, JD On 08/13/2016 02:09 PM, Patrick Dupre wrote: Hello, I guess that it is going to work; I must now be able to make an install. I am able to run gparted by setting vesa 1280x1024 which is actually turned to 1920x1080 !! Then, I was able to run the fc24 fedora installer. Thank for all the suggestions === Patrick DUPRÉ | | email:pdu...@gmx.com Laboratoire de Physico-Chimie de l'Atmosphère | | Université du Littoral-Côte d'Opale | | Tel. (33)-(0)3 28 23 76 12 | | Fax: 03 28 65 82 44 189A, avenue Maurice Schumann | | 59140 Dunkerque, France === Sent: Saturday, August 13, 2016 at 7:08 PM From: jd1008 To:users@lists.fedoraproject.org Subject: Re: MSI On 08/13/2016 12:22 AM, Samuel Sieb wrote: On 08/12/2016 05:43 PM, jd1008 wrote: This good info for me - but one needs 2 computers for the vnc, and a working lan for vnc to work. The text mode seems terrible because it pretty much will not let user have a multi boot HD. I think the developers need to address this issue in future releases. No, the problem is that NVidia is not open-source friendly, so I make sure any computers I buy don't have NVidia graphics. That was the effective gist of my first reply to the OP :) -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/users@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct:http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct Guidelines:http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away:http://ask.fedoraproject.org -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/users@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedor
Re: Fedora 24: LibreOffice Quickstartet
On Tue, 16 Aug 2016 09:46:22 +0200 Tibor Attila Anca wrote: > I really miss this quickstarter of LibreOffice in Fedora 24 (otherwise > an excellent distribution). Is there any possibility to get it besides Mentioning it here is unlikely to get results, as this is the user list. The best way to accomplish this, if it is possible, is to go to https://bugzilla.redhat.com/ and open a ticket against libreoffice asking that this quickstarter be included. It's an RFE (request for enhancement). There is no guarantee that it will happen, unless of course you volunteer to take the task upon yourself to ensure it happens, but it is more likely when you make an official request like this. -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/users@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
Samsung Gs3 and F24/Xfce
I worked this out with F21 back in '14 and it worked just fine with F22. I had to add gvfs-mtp to get the Gs3 to mount back then. I added it and still not getting the Gs3 to mount. I get the mounting of the Verizon CD that would load the Windoz drivers, but then it just goes away and the Samsung mount point does not replace it. Do I have to reboot after installing gvfs-mtp? One thing of note in that my system is claiming that I have a AudioCD waiting to be mounted. I DID yesterday play and audio CD, but I unmounted it and disconnected the USB CD/DVD drive. Ideas? thanks -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/users@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
Re: Installed by dependency or not
On Tue, 16 Aug 2016 13:04:42 +0200 Frank Elsner wrote: > how to determine whether a packet was installed by dependency > or by an explicit "dnf install ..."? Maybe someone more knowledgeable than me will chime in, but I don't think there is a way. dnf knows when removing a package leaves behind what it calls leaves, packages that have nothing depending on them, but I don't think it keeps track of installation method beyond repository of origin. If it is a single package, you could try a dnf remove to see what it wants to remove for dependencies. Those packages would have installed the package you want to remove if it wasn't already installed (pulled it in as a dependency). Packages that have a *lot* of dependencies when you try to remove them, were probably installed as part of the base installation. HTH -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/users@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
Re: Installed by dependency or not
On Tue, 2016-08-16 at 10:57 -0700, stan wrote: > On Tue, 16 Aug 2016 13:04:42 +0200 > Frank Elsner wrote: > > > > > how to determine whether a packet was installed by dependency > > or by an explicit "dnf install ..."? > > Maybe someone more knowledgeable than me will chime in, but I don't > think there is a way. dnf knows when removing a package leaves behind > what it calls leaves, packages that have nothing depending on them, but > I don't think it keeps track of installation method beyond repository > of origin. > > If it is a single package, you could try a dnf remove to see what it > wants to remove for dependencies. Those packages would have installed > the package you want to remove if it wasn't already installed (pulled > it in as a dependency). > > Packages that have a *lot* of dependencies when you try to remove them, > were probably installed as part of the base installation. From dnf(1): dnf history userinstalled List names of all packages installed by a user. The output can be used as the %packages section in a kickstart file. However it's far from clear what that actually means as there is no other information about it. poc -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/users@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
Re: Installed by dependency or not
On Tue, 16 Aug 2016 21:03:29 +0100 Patrick O'Callaghan wrote: > From dnf(1): > > dnf history userinstalled > List names of all packages installed by a user. The > output can be used as the %packages section in a kickstart file. > > However it's far from clear what that actually means as there is no > other information about it. I think that is the packages that show up as commandline in installed. That is, packages that were installed locally from an rpm using the -C option. When I've installed Fedora packages from the Fedora repository in the past, they show up in dnf as Fedora, not commandline. But I could be wrong, I'm still finding my way around dnf. -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/users@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
Re: Installed by dependency or not
On Tue, 2016-08-16 at 15:38 -0700, stan wrote: > On Tue, 16 Aug 2016 21:03:29 +0100 > Patrick O'Callaghan wrote: > > > > > > From dnf(1): > > > > dnf history userinstalled > > List names of all packages installed by a user. The > > output can be used as the %packages section in a kickstart file. > > > > However it's far from clear what that actually means as there is no > > other information about it. > > I think that is the packages that show up as commandline in installed. > That is, packages that were installed locally from an rpm using the -C > option. When I've installed Fedora packages from the Fedora > repository in the past, they show up in dnf as Fedora, not commandline. That would make sense except that it also seems to list kernels for some reason (I can't recall ever doing "dnf install kernel"), so who knows. poc -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/users@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
Re: Samsung Gs3 and F24/Xfce
On Tue, 16 Aug 2016 13:54:23 -0400 Robert Moskowitz wrote: > I had to add gvfs-mtp to get the Gs3 to mount back then. I added it > and still not getting the Gs3 to mount. I get the mounting of the > Verizon CD that would load the Windoz drivers, but then it just goes > away and the Samsung mount point does not replace it. > > Do I have to reboot after installing gvfs-mtp? I know only what you've written about gvfs-mtp. But my question would be does lsmod show it? If it doesn't, you will have to load the kernel module using modprobe [module name]. A reboot would do it as well. > One thing of note in that my system is claiming that I have a AudioCD > waiting to be mounted. I DID yesterday play and audio CD, but I > unmounted it and disconnected the USB CD/DVD drive. > > Ideas? Did you umount it manually? Maybe you bypassed the logic of the application or system program telling you it is waiting to be mounted. So it still thinks it is waiting, though it is long gone. -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/users@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
Re: Samsung Gs3 and F24/Xfce
On 08/16/2016 08:05 PM, stan wrote: On Tue, 16 Aug 2016 13:54:23 -0400 Robert Moskowitz wrote: I had to add gvfs-mtp to get the Gs3 to mount back then. I added it and still not getting the Gs3 to mount. I get the mounting of the Verizon CD that would load the Windoz drivers, but then it just goes away and the Samsung mount point does not replace it. Do I have to reboot after installing gvfs-mtp? I know only what you've written about gvfs-mtp. But my question would be does lsmod show it? If it doesn't, you will have to load the kernel module using modprobe [module name]. A reboot would do it as well. lsmod|grep gvfs comes up with nothing to display. and # modprobe gvfs-mtp modprobe: FATAL: Module gvfs-mtp not found in directory /lib/modules/4.6.5-300.fc24.x86_64 One thing of note in that my system is claiming that I have a AudioCD waiting to be mounted. I DID yesterday play and audio CD, but I unmounted it and disconnected the USB CD/DVD drive. Ideas? Did you umount it manually? Maybe you bypassed the logic of the application or system program telling you it is waiting to be mounted. So it still thinks it is waiting, though it is long gone. I manually umounted it in Thunar. Then after it showed unmounted there, I pulled the drive. Only to find it still showing on my desktop. I am now using the USB DVD/CD drive to copy a data DVD and it is going fine and shows on the desktop, along with that AudioCD icon. Probably will take at least a logout to clear it up. -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/users@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
Re: Samsung Gs3 and F24/Xfce
On 08/16/2016 05:36 PM, Robert Moskowitz wrote: lsmod|grep gvfs comes up with nothing to display. and # modprobe gvfs-mtp modprobe: FATAL: Module gvfs-mtp not found in directory /lib/modules/4.6.5-300.fc24.x86_64 I have gvfs-mtp installed and get the same results. In fact, I have my phone mounted and am browsing the SD card and still get the same results. -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/users@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
Decent picture viewer
For the longest time I used gthumb for picture viewer. I even installed a gnome app on my Xfce desktop with Fedora21, but I did not like what they did to gthumb in Fedora22. I almost shudder to think what it looks like in F24 (though I could try the liveCD and see...). Anyway, Ristretto in Xfce is really not adequate, so I am asking really nicely, please for recommendations. :) What picture viewer do you use on F24? thanks -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/users@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
Re: Samsung Gs3 and F24/Xfce
On 08/16/2016 08:56 PM, Joe Zeff wrote: On 08/16/2016 05:36 PM, Robert Moskowitz wrote: lsmod|grep gvfs comes up with nothing to display. and # modprobe gvfs-mtp modprobe: FATAL: Module gvfs-mtp not found in directory /lib/modules/4.6.5-300.fc24.x86_64 I have gvfs-mtp installed and get the same results. In fact, I have my phone mounted and am browsing the SD card and still get the same results. Still not working. Looks like I am going to have to reboot. -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/users@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
Re: Decent picture viewer
On Tue, 16 Aug 2016 21:12:04 -0400 Robert Moskowitz wrote: > What picture viewer do you use on F24? qiv, though I've dabbled with gwenview. -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/users@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
Re: Samsung Gs3 and F24/Xfce
On Tue, Aug 16, 2016 at 05:56:09PM -0700, Joe Zeff wrote: > On 08/16/2016 05:36 PM, Robert Moskowitz wrote: > > > > lsmod|grep gvfs > > > > comes up with nothing to display. > > > > and > > > > # modprobe gvfs-mtp > > modprobe: FATAL: Module gvfs-mtp not found in directory > > /lib/modules/4.6.5-300.fc24.x86_64 > > I have gvfs-mtp installed and get the same results. In fact, I have my > phone mounted and am browsing the SD card and still get the same results. They may be FUSE, file systems in user space and thus not in the kernel. jon -- Jon H. LaBadie jo...@jgcomp.com -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/users@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
Re: Samsung Gs3 and F24/Xfce
On 08/16/2016 06:17 PM, Robert Moskowitz wrote: Still not working. Looks like I am going to have to reboot. Before you do that, or if it doesn't work, try going into the Settings for Storage on your phone and changing your USB connection from Charge Only to MTB, or Media Device. Be warned that this will prevent it from charging by USB until you change it back if that matters. -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/users@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
