Re: MSMTP Problem [OT] FIXED

2012-09-16 Thread Arthur Dent
On Mon, 2012-09-10 at 10:44 +0800, Ed Greshko wrote:
> On 09/09/2012 09:07 PM, Arthur Dent wrote:
> >> > You can test msmtp without using a configuration file by creating a 
> >> > "message" and then doing something like
> >> > 
> >> > cat message | /usr/bin/msmtp --host=smtp.blueyonder.co.uk -f 
> >> > y...@whatever.com to...@someplace.com 
> > Ha! That works! (Well sort of)...
> > I used the command:
> > cat message | /usr/bin/msmtp --host=smtp.blueyonder.co.uk -f
> > m...@mydomian.org f...@myotherdomain.eu (where myotherdomain.eu has a
> > catchall redirect the sends mail to m...@mydomain.com)
> >
> > The mail came through with a "From" (and return) address of
> > SRS0=yLoOyU=mydomain.org=m...@myotherdomain.eu
> >
> > Not quite sure how those strings came about, but at least mail gets
> > through.
> 
> Your "message" fileis it a properly formatted email message?
> 
> >
> > So the question:
> > What settings should I be using?
> 
> Not sure what you're asking there.
> 

Sorry Ed,

I didn't mean to be rude in not replying, but I got hit with a problem
in $REALLIFE.

What I meant by this was what settings should I use in /etc/msmtprchttp?

What I had at that point was in the bit of my mail that you trimmed in
your reply:
> > logfile /var/log/msmtp.log
> > tls on
> > tls_certcheck off
> > tls_starttls off
> > host smtp.blueyonder.co.uk
> > from nore...@mydomain.org

I tried taking out (commenting out) the tls stuff. No joy. I tried
altering the "from"... Success! I changed it to be "m...@mydomain.org".
"mark" is a valid user on this machine. Is that what the problem was? If
that is the case I didn't spot anywhere that it was a requirement that
the "from" be a "valid" user.

Anyhow - it now works. The strange thing is that I had not re-enabled
the tls settings and - even though Blueyonder insist that connections
should be made with SSL - it still works!

Thanks for all your your help.

Mark



signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
-- 
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org


Re: Knode sync

2012-09-16 Thread Tim
Tim:
>> One approach:  Run knode on the server, access it over SSH.
>> 
>> Simple, brute force, effective.

Timothy Murphy:
> when I run knode on my server through ssh I get the error
> ---
> [tim@rose ~]$ ssh grover knode
> (26507)/: Cannot find the D-Bus session server
> ---
> However, if I just run "ssh grover"
> and then run knode on grover, all works fine.

Try using -x or -y options with the ssh command.  It's the usual culprit
when you want to use a graphical tool over ssh.

-- 
[tim@localhost ~]$ uname -r
2.6.27.25-78.2.56.fc9.i686

Don't send private replies to my address, the mailbox is ignored.  I
read messages from the public lists.



-- 
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org


Re: Knode sync

2012-09-16 Thread Timothy Murphy
Tim wrote:

>>> One approach:  Run knode on the server, access it over SSH.
>>> 
>>> Simple, brute force, effective.

>> when I run knode on my server through ssh I get the error
>> ---
>> [tim@rose ~]$ ssh grover knode
>> (26507)/: Cannot find the D-Bus session server
>> ---
>> However, if I just run "ssh grover"
>> and then run knode on grover, all works fine.

> Try using -x or -y options with the ssh command.  It's the usual culprit
> when you want to use a graphical tool over ssh.

Thank you very much.
You were quite right - after changing the command to
  ssh -Y grover knode
all works well.

I'm using this method now, with a KDE button
(created by right-clicking on the K icon)
to start knode on my server.

There are one or two quirks to iron out,
but they are probably due to the fact that knode is running under CentOS,
the OS of my server.

-- 
Timothy Murphy  
e-mail: gayleard /at/ eircom.net
tel: +353-86-2336090, +353-1-2842366
s-mail: School of Mathematics, Trinity College, Dublin 2, Ireland

-- 
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org


Re: Symbolic computation on Fedora

2012-09-16 Thread Suvayu Ali
Hello everyone,

First, thank you for your thoughts and suggestions.

On Sat, Sep 15, 2012 at 01:14:42PM -0400, Matthew Miller wrote:
> On Sat, Sep 15, 2012 at 09:59:40AM -0500, Richard Shaw wrote:
> > Ick... This thing (sage) is a mess of bundled libraries you'll
> > definitely need to manage your own install. This looks to be a ton of
> > work to unbundle all the libraries if someone wanted to package it
> > officially.
> 
> There was some work on packaging it for Fedora a few years ago; not sure
> offhand where that went. A fundamental issue, as you've noticed, is that
> Sage is more a software *distribution* itself than it is an appliction.
> This doesn't lend itself well to packaging.
>

At the moment I am short on time, so cannot experiment with sage.  That
said, Fedora has a long standing packaging effort for SAGE[1].  It seems
to me sage needs a TeXLive-like distribution model to be not so
intimidating for new users.  This however does not make the effort
required to include it in Linux distribution respositories any simpler.

I'll try compiling my own in a few weeks when I have some more time and
report back.

Cheers,


Footnotes:

[1] 


-- 
Suvayu

Open source is the future. It sets us free.
-- 
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org


Re: Fedora 17 in a CHROOT on Ubuntu - and the wrong dependency on rpmlib(X-CheckUnifiedSystemdir)

2012-09-16 Thread Suvayu Ali
Hi Bill,

On Fri, Sep 14, 2012 at 10:31:20AM -0400, Bill Davidsen wrote:
> Marc Wäckerlin wrote:
> >Hi
> >
> >I am working in Ubuntu and compiling RPMs for Fedora. That's why I install 
> >Fedora in
> >a **chroot** environment. That works fine with Fedora 16, but fails with 
> >Fedora 17 due
> >to the wrong "rpmlib(X-CheckUnifiedSystemdir)" dependency.
> >
> >I Do not upgrade and I cannot use dracut, because Fedora 17 is in a chroot 
> >and cannot
> >boot. So the instructions at 
> >http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Upgrading_Fedora_using_yum
> >do **not** help.
> >
> >How to solve the problem? What does dracut do, why(*) does rpm fail, where 
> >does this
> >dependency come from? How can I either fake this dependency or prevent RPM 
> >from requiring
> >it? I need a deep inside knowledge on what's going on, what dracut does and 
> >what rpm does.
> >What have the fedora-guys patched to get thie wrong dependency, and how can 
> >I undo it?
> >
> >
> >(*) I mean technically *why*, not user-view answers like "to prevent 
> >upgrades without
> >fs-migration", this kind of answer does not help, but technical answers like 
> >"dracut
> >creates content X in file Y, then the dependency is ignored in rpm"
> >
> Marc, I have to ask why you are doing that as opposed to just creating a VM
> and running Fedora in that. It just seems so much easier. And I have friends
> running fc17 in VM on both Mac and Windows7, so it's pretty sure Ubuntu
> would do so as well.
> 
> Just curious why you took that approach.
> 

I have a similar build system for SLC 5.7.  Our software can also be
deployed in a VM; I have tried that but found the overhead of using a VM
(build times, test job run times and the fact that you have to have a
working virtualisation setup) rather large.  Instead now I (and many of
my colleagues) use a few scripts to maintain the chroot system for our
software.  This also seems easier to implement across multiple linux
distros without much fiddling (it's after all a few scripts that uses
chroot to setup the environment).  To give you an idea about the "easy
on various" distros bit, we have tried this on Arch, Ubuntu, Fedora and
Debian.  Getting it to work on Fedora required some extra effort to get
the SELinux labels for the chroot'ed directory hierarchy correct.

Hope that answers your question.

-- 
Suvayu

Open source is the future. It sets us free.
-- 
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org


Re: Slightly OT about urls

2012-09-16 Thread Eddie G. O'Connor Jr.

On 09/15/2012 03:29 PM, Joe Zeff wrote:

On 09/15/2012 12:11 PM, Eddie G. O'Connor Jr. wrote:

This all sounds so confusing! But I think I've actally been to a site
like that once! It was "based" out of Chinaand no matter WHAT link
you clicked on, you'd go to a separate page that had NO way to hit the
"Back" button on your browser!.How is that even POSSIBLE!?


Back in the Bad Old Days, I had a page on my site that claimed to be a 
dead end on the Internet.  There were no links on it, hitting the Back 
button just reloaded it and your history was blank.


How did I do it?  Easy: the link to it went through eleven redirects 
with blank names, because in those days your history only showed your 
last ten pages.  The Back button just reloaded a redirect, and 
clicking on any of the blank lines in your history just lead back to 
the dead end.  Then, mirable dictu, Intersnot Exploder Did The Right 
Thing so that using the Back button skipped over any redirects, and 
about a year later, Nutscrape copied them and the page stopped 
working.  Still, it was amusing while it lasted.


No, that probably doesn't answer your question, but I thought you 
might find it interesting.  Besides, it's my birthday today so you 
have to humor me on things like this even if you don't want to. How 
old am I? Well, if you write out my new age in hex, I appear to be the 
same age as Jack Benny.
Well then first things first Happy Birthday To You Sir!I apologize 
for responding so late to this, but I've been on a whirlwind of a month 
so far,...car repairscar rentalthe birthday of my 
Now-Twelve-Year-Old-Son-Who's-Not-A-Kid-Anymore-So-I-Should-Treat-Him-More-Like-A-Teen! 
As for the web page redirecting thing, out of my own curious mind I'm 
thinking if that ability has been done away with permanently.how 
many times do I go to a web-site and then something else 
appears?wouldn't think this kind of thing would still be 
around.Enjoy your Birthday...Jack Benny huh?.I actually 
remember watching that show as a kidand I was born in the 70's!...LoL!



EGO II
--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org


start SSHD in services

2012-09-16 Thread Jim

Fedora 17
SSHD is not in or started in Services , how do I start it ?
--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org


Re: start SSHD in services

2012-09-16 Thread Arthur Dent
On Sun, 2012-09-16 at 13:00 -0400, Jim wrote:
> Fedora 17
> SSHD is not in or started in Services , how do I start it ?

As root:
systemctl enable sshd.service (to ensure it starts at boot time)
systemctl start sshd.service (to start it)
systemctl restart sshd.service (to restart it)
systemctl stop sshd.service (to stop it)

I still find this a useful resource:
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/SysVinit_to_Systemd_Cheatsheet

Hope that helps...

Mark




signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
-- 
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org


Re: Why did they f*ck with GIMP?

2012-09-16 Thread Eddie G. O'Connor Jr.

On 09/14/2012 02:27 PM, fred smith wrote:

On Thu, Sep 13, 2012 at 07:58:07PM -0300, Lailah wrote:

El jue, 13-09-2012 a las 15:41 -0400, Fedora User escribió:

People must have too much time on their hands. Add some features; maybe
clean up some code. But why on earth make major UI changes to a program
that consistently did exactly what it was supposed to do exactly as it
was supposed to do it - - - and now doesn't. Ugh!

Could you be more specific, please?  I don't find anything strange on Gimp
but the lack of FX-Foundry plugins pack.
Thanks!
Lailah

because there's been a LOT of whining from many people about the multi-
window interface. Allegedly it alienates Photoshop users, preventing
them from being willing to learn to  use Gimp (and Linux, et al.)

Not sure I buy it, but that's the reasoning as I understand it.



I'd have to agree with the reasoning for this, up until today I avoided 
GIMP vigorously because I didn't know there was a way to have one 
window!now that I know...(I've already changed it!) I'll be delving 
into its inner workings on a deeper level!



EGO II
--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org


Re: Why did they f*ck with GIMP?

2012-09-16 Thread Eddie G. O'Connor Jr.

On 09/14/2012 02:32 PM, Alan Evans wrote:

On Fri, Sep 14, 2012 at 11:27 AM, fred smith wrote:

because there's been a LOT of whining from many people about the multi-
window interface. Allegedly it alienates Photoshop users, preventing
them from being willing to learn to  use Gimp (and Linux, et al.)

There seems to be a lot of hatred here (even in this thread) for the
multi-window interface. But I, for one, wish that *more* applications
implemented it.

It is seriously the only way to go when you have multiple monitors and
edit a lot of images simultaneously. (Try to imagine stretching a
single-window interface across three screens. Ick.)

-Alan
The flipside to this would be only having a small laptop screen to work 
with and not wanting to switch to various windows constantly in order to 
get something done in GIMP.



EGO II
--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org


Byobu

2012-09-16 Thread Phil Dobbin
Hi, all.

After the last kernel upgrade (=> 3.5.3-1) notifications in Byobu ceased
to work (amongst other things: an existing kvm machine no longer works
as Nautilus keeps crashing when it's launched so I had to re-install that).

I've tried reverting back to 5.17 with no luck (both via Yum & compiling
it myself), newt-python which is what Byobu uses for notifications, is
all present & correct & I can't find anyone in the same position as
myself on Google.

Has anybody on the list seen this anomaly?

Cheers,

  Phil...

-- 
currently (ab)using
CentOS 6.3, Debian Squeeze, Fedora Beefy, OS X Snow Leopard, Ubuntu Precise





signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
-- 
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org


Re: start SSHD in services

2012-09-16 Thread jdow

On 2012/09/16 10:08, Arthur Dent wrote:

On Sun, 2012-09-16 at 13:00 -0400, Jim wrote:

Fedora 17
SSHD is not in or started in Services , how do I start it ?


As root:
systemctl enable sshd.service (to ensure it starts at boot time)
systemctl start sshd.service (to start it)
systemctl restart sshd.service (to restart it)
systemctl stop sshd.service (to stop it)

I still find this a useful resource:
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/SysVinit_to_Systemd_Cheatsheet

Hope that helps...

Mark


Gee, they could make for even more keyboarding my requiring an essay
about why you need this action to take place followed by the word
"please". They screwed up. (hint, isn't the ".service" suffix rather
redundantly needless repetition?)

{+_+}
--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org


Re: start SSHD in services

2012-09-16 Thread Joe Zeff

On 09/16/2012 12:11 PM, jdow wrote:

Gee, they could make for even more keyboarding my requiring an essay
about why you need this action to take place followed by the word
"please". They screwed up. (hint, isn't the ".service" suffix rather
redundantly needless repetition?)


If nothing else, systemctl should assume that as an extension if none is 
supplied.  It's not exactly rocket surgery, considering that back in the 
old CP/M days compilers were able to do the equivalent.

--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org


Re: start SSHD in services

2012-09-16 Thread jdow

On 2012/09/16 12:30, Joe Zeff wrote:

On 09/16/2012 12:11 PM, jdow wrote:

Gee, they could make for even more keyboarding my requiring an essay
about why you need this action to take place followed by the word
"please". They screwed up. (hint, isn't the ".service" suffix rather
redundantly needless repetition?)


If nothing else, systemctl should assume that as an extension if none is
supplied.  It's not exactly rocket surgery, considering that back in the old
CP/M days compilers were able to do the equivalent.


When is the last time you had to type the ".exe" in order to run a file
with a .exe suffix - on a DOS/Winders based machine? On the other paw,
why bother with the suffix at all? Even AmigaDOS got that answer right.

{^_-}
--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org


grub2 confusing need to add simple setting

2012-09-16 Thread Edward M

Hello,

  I have not needed to touch grub2 config files until now
  to add a simple setting and I am finding grub2 confusing.
   How do I add nomodeset in grub2.
  I miss the old grub:'(
  .

 Thanks
--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org


Re: grub2 confusing need to add simple setting

2012-09-16 Thread Mateusz Marzantowicz
On 16.09.2012 22:13, Edward M wrote:
> Hello,
>
>   I have not needed to touch grub2 config files until now
>   to add a simple setting and I am finding grub2 confusing.
>How do I add nomodeset in grub2.
>   I miss the old grub:'(
>   .
>
>  Thanks

Try editing GRUB_CMDLINE_LINUX in /etc/default/grub. Remember to update
grub configuration with: grub2-mkconfig -o /boot/grub2/grub.cfg.

You may also try to pass nomodeset as command line parameter in grub's
boot menu to see if it works.


Mateusz Marzantowicz
-- 
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org


Re: MSMTP Problem [OT] FIXED

2012-09-16 Thread James Wilkinson
Arthur Dent wrote:
> I tried taking out (commenting out) the tls stuff. No joy. I tried
> altering the "from"... Success! I changed it to be "m...@mydomain.org".
> "mark" is a valid user on this machine. Is that what the problem was? If
> that is the case I didn't spot anywhere that it was a requirement that
> the "from" be a "valid" user.
> 
> Anyhow - it now works. The strange thing is that I had not re-enabled
> the tls settings and - even though Blueyonder insist that connections
> should be made with SSL - it still works!

Just reading through this thread, I’d thought I’d make a couple of
comments.

One is that whenever you’re sending email through someone else’s server,
there’s the possibility that email might fall foul of a counter-spam
measure, and you can’t tell what those measures really are.

This is still the case when you’re sending as an authenticated user and
you have some sort of relationship (business, for example) with the
server’s owner. A system like smtp.blueyonder.co.uk is unlikely to be
blocked even if it does send the occasional email. That makes it
valuable to spammers, who can obtain valid login details from
compromised Windows systems (or phishing, or using stolen credit card
details, or a number of other routes). Once they’ve done that, they’ll
try to send as many emails through as possible before they get caught.
There should be systems in place to try to minimise the damage when that
happens.

I think that’s what you’re experiencing: changing minor details like the
from name doesn’t affect whether the SMTP conversation works (the
recipient has no business checking whether the “from” user is “valid”),
but it can affect the spam filter logic. If smtp.blueyonder.co.uk is
expecting only real users using end-user MTAs to relay through it, then
it might be configured to treat noreply@ and other signs of “this has
come from a PHP script” as spam indicators (quite possibly in a
scoring-based system similar to SpamAssassin).

And the key point here is that you’ve only “fixed” one of the possible
spam indicators, the weighting may well change in future (so it may well
break when you haven’t changed anything), and the number of emails sent
per hour may well be factored in to the filter.

If this is for home use, you might well decide just to live with all this.

The second point is why you didn’t need SSL/TLS. I suspect this is just
because you may have turned TLS off, but you might not have turned
authentication (passwords) off: msmtp will use secure login methods over
unencrypted connections.

Alternatively, if smtp.blueyonder.co.uk is configured for incoming email
as well as relaying to the outside world, it could use the presence of
SSL or TLS to select what it does, and even without a login it might
accept email for your domain in the same way as it would from any other
server.

(Does dig -t mx +short mydomain.org mention smtp.blueyonder.co.uk at
all?)

Hope this helps,

James.

P.S.: if you ever plan to send email from web pages to random addresses
on the wider Internet, please think about how that could be misused!

-- 
E-mail: james@ | Legacy (adj): an uncomplimentary computer-industry
aprilcottage.co.uk | epithet that means 'it works'.
   | -- Anthony DeBoer
-- 
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org


Re: start SSHD in services

2012-09-16 Thread Matthew Miller
On Sun, Sep 16, 2012 at 12:11:19PM -0700, jdow wrote:
> >I still find this a useful resource:
> >http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/SysVinit_to_Systemd_Cheatsheet
> >Hope that helps...
> Gee, they could make for even more keyboarding my requiring an essay
> about why you need this action to take place followed by the word
> "please". They screwed up. (hint, isn't the ".service" suffix rather
> redundantly needless repetition?)

You can also use the old chkconfig and service commands -- they forward to
the systemctl actions.

The new system is certainly more wordy, and the user interface could
probably stand some refinement for real-world users. For this simple action,
it seems particularly over-wordy. This supports a more flexible system, but
when you're just trying to enable ssh you probably don't really care.

As eventually everything is converted to systemctl, making 'service' be the
more user-friendly interface for the simple case may be the best way to go.
What do you think?

-- 
Matthew Miller -- Fedora Cloud Architect --  
-- 
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org


Re: how 2 make LibreOffice the default app for RTF files?

2012-09-16 Thread fred smith
On Sun, SOP 16, 2012 at 11:58:08AM +0800, Ed Garish wrote:
> On 09/16/2012 11:05 AM, fred smith wrote:
> > Can't figure out how to get F17 to use LibreOffice Writer when opening a
> > RTF file,... It seems to want to use  Calibre for that. :( The "Preferred
> > applications" item on the menu only offers a few programs, and LO isn't
> > one of 'em.
> >
> > BTW, this is for the MATE desktop, though pretty much the same question
> > applies to XFCE or Gnome.
> 
> Don't know anything about MATE.  And you've not said anything about "how" you 
> are opening the file.
> 
> However, in GNOME 3 and using Nautilus to open the file...all you need to do 
> is right click on the file, choose Properties and then make the selection in 
> the "Open with" tab and make it the default.

HUH! it's so obvious! nevertheless, I'd have thought that would change the
property for only that one file. but it seems to do what I wanted.

thanks!

Fred

-- 
---
 .Fred Smith   /  
( /__  ,__.   __   __ /  __   : / 
 //  /   /__) /  /  /__) .+'   Home: fre...@fcshome.stoneham.ma.us 
//  (__ (___ (__(_ (___ / :__ 781-438-5471 
 Jude 1:24,25 -
-- 
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org


Re:grub2 confusing need to add simple setting[SOLVED]

2012-09-16 Thread Edward M

On 09/16/2012 02:22 PM, Mateusz Marzantowicz wrote:

Try editing GRUB_CMDLINE_LINUX in /etc/default/grub. Remember to update
grub configuration with: grub2-mkconfig -o /boot/grub2/grub.cfg.


this did the trick.

thanks
--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org


Re: Symbolic computation on Fedora

2012-09-16 Thread Michael Hannon

>At the moment I am short on time, so cannot experiment with sage.  That
>said, Fedora has a long standing packaging effort for SAGE[1].  It seems
>to me sage needs a TeXLive-like distribution model to be not so
>intimidating for new users.  This however does not make the effort
>required to include it in Linux distribution respositories any simpler.
>
>I'll try compiling my own in a few weeks when I have some more time and
>report back.


Hi, Suvayu.  It's possible I was just lucky enough to have all the required 
dependencies already installed, but in my case it took less than a minute of my 
own time to download and build sage (e.g., "wget ...; make").  It did take a 
lot of time for the file to download and the build to complete, but I didn't 
have to do anything while these were ongoing.

-- Mike

-- 
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org


Re: Why did they f*ck with GIMP?

2012-09-16 Thread Roger

On 09/17/2012 03:20 AM, Eddie G. O'Connor Jr. wrote:

On 09/14/2012 02:32 PM, Alan Evans wrote:

On Fri, Sep 14, 2012 at 11:27 AM, fred smith wrote:

because there's been a LOT of whining from many people about the multi-
window interface. Allegedly it alienates Photoshop users, preventing
them from being willing to learn to  use Gimp (and Linux, et al.)

There seems to be a lot of hatred here (even in this thread) for the
multi-window interface. But I, for one, wish that *more* applications
implemented it.

It is seriously the only way to go when you have multiple monitors and
edit a lot of images simultaneously. (Try to imagine stretching a
single-window interface across three screens. Ick.)

-Alan
The flipside to this would be only having a small laptop screen to 
work with and not wanting to switch to various windows constantly in 
order to get something done in GIMP.



EGO II
Not so at all, There is no hatred, just discussion of merit one way or 
another.


Both my daughters use multi window Gimp, as is, on 3 or 4 laptops, they 
also do not see any reason to change to a one size fits all prospect.
I use Gimp on a multi monitor desktop and on an old Dell 1520 laptop and 
have no problem with multi screen.


An analogy would be that on my work bench in my shed, a real life 
situation, I could not work if the periphery was taken up by all of my 
tools of which I use one at a time, no! they get put back on hooks, on 
racks, in drawers. This is Gimp, putting the tools away until needed 
once again.

Gimp multi window is for me, like my hard copy work bench. A delight to use.

Alienating Photoshop users is an entirely different subject, not related 
to Gimp single or multi screen use. It really should not be part of this 
discussion. It implies that they have a mental block prevention from 
learning new ways. I do not believe that to be the case.
Photoshop users will not and have no reason to change. They are happy 
with their expensive image manipulation software.
There are millions of new users out there who do not want photoshop and 
it is those who need to be told about Gimp. They will learn multi window 
quickly.


One of my daughters, mentioned above, is a secondary teacher at a 
private college. She used photoshop for a few days because her students did.
Removed it and went to Gimp, as did all of her students who no longer 
complain loud and long about having to use such a crap application that 
broke continuously.


There are reasons for and against every GUI, but from my experience, no 
one I know wants to revert to photoshop because it is too difficult to 
use when compared to Gimp with it's multi screen.


Roger



Roger
--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org


Re: Symbolic computation on Fedora

2012-09-16 Thread Matthew Saltzman
On Sun, 2012-09-16 at 09:13 -0400, Suvayu Ali wrote: 
> Hello everyone,
> 
> First, thank you for your thoughts and suggestions.
> 
> On Sat, Sep 15, 2012 at 01:14:42PM -0400, Matthew Miller wrote:
> > On Sat, Sep 15, 2012 at 09:59:40AM -0500, Richard Shaw wrote:
> > > Ick... This thing (sage) is a mess of bundled libraries you'll
> > > definitely need to manage your own install. This looks to be a ton of
> > > work to unbundle all the libraries if someone wanted to package it
> > > officially.
> > 
> > There was some work on packaging it for Fedora a few years ago; not sure
> > offhand where that went. A fundamental issue, as you've noticed, is that
> > Sage is more a software *distribution* itself than it is an appliction.
> > This doesn't lend itself well to packaging.
> >
> 
> At the moment I am short on time, so cannot experiment with sage.  That
> said, Fedora has a long standing packaging effort for SAGE[1].  It seems
> to me sage needs a TeXLive-like distribution model to be not so
> intimidating for new users.  This however does not make the effort
> required to include it in Linux distribution respositories any simpler.
> 
> I'll try compiling my own in a few weeks when I have some more time and
> report back.

I have built Sage on Fedora 17 and RHEL 6 with no difficulty.  It is a
big ugly package, but it is self contained.  It would be nice to have a
package setup like TeXLive, but I have seen the discussions about the
challenges involved.

> 
> Cheers,
> 
> 
> Footnotes:
> 
> [1] 
> 
> 

-- 
Matthew Saltzman
Clemson University Math Sciences
mjs AT clemson DOT edu

-- 
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org


Booting Grub2 on F17

2012-09-16 Thread Jim

Fedora 17

This is a dual boot computer Fedora and Windows 7

How would I edit /boot/grub2/grub.cfg to get the the boot process to 
stop at the Menu to be able to select Fedora or Windows7.


I do not want to have to hit "Return" or "Tab" to get it to stop at the 
Selection Menu.
A new User to Linux will be operating this computer and I do not want to 
put him in a position to have to hit extra keys, to make his selection.

--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org


Re: Fedora 17 in a CHROOT on Ubuntu - and the wrong dependency on rpmlib(X-CheckUnifiedSystemdir)

2012-09-16 Thread Bill Davidsen

Suvayu Ali wrote:

Hi Bill,

On Fri, Sep 14, 2012 at 10:31:20AM -0400, Bill Davidsen wrote:

Marc Wäckerlin wrote:

Hi

I am working in Ubuntu and compiling RPMs for Fedora. That's why I install 
Fedora in
a **chroot** environment. That works fine with Fedora 16, but fails with Fedora 
17 due
to the wrong "rpmlib(X-CheckUnifiedSystemdir)" dependency.

I Do not upgrade and I cannot use dracut, because Fedora 17 is in a chroot and 
cannot
boot. So the instructions at 
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Upgrading_Fedora_using_yum
do **not** help.

How to solve the problem? What does dracut do, why(*) does rpm fail, where does 
this
dependency come from? How can I either fake this dependency or prevent RPM from 
requiring
it? I need a deep inside knowledge on what's going on, what dracut does and 
what rpm does.
What have the fedora-guys patched to get thie wrong dependency, and how can I 
undo it?


(*) I mean technically *why*, not user-view answers like "to prevent upgrades 
without
fs-migration", this kind of answer does not help, but technical answers like 
"dracut
creates content X in file Y, then the dependency is ignored in rpm"


Marc, I have to ask why you are doing that as opposed to just creating a VM
and running Fedora in that. It just seems so much easier. And I have friends
running fc17 in VM on both Mac and Windows7, so it's pretty sure Ubuntu
would do so as well.

Just curious why you took that approach.



I have a similar build system for SLC 5.7.  Our software can also be
deployed in a VM; I have tried that but found the overhead of using a VM
(build times, test job run times and the fact that you have to have a
working virtualisation setup) rather large.  Instead now I (and many of
my colleagues) use a few scripts to maintain the chroot system for our
software.  This also seems easier to implement across multiple linux
distros without much fiddling (it's after all a few scripts that uses
chroot to setup the environment).  To give you an idea about the "easy
on various" distros bit, we have tried this on Arch, Ubuntu, Fedora and
Debian.  Getting it to work on Fedora required some extra effort to get
the SELinux labels for the chroot'ed directory hierarchy correct.

Your last sentence sums up some of the issues I hit with chroot, but I'm glad it 
works well enough for your needs. I don't like to worry about the build options 
of the kernel I run vs. the environment of another distribution, so I went the 
VM route using a raw disk image. It runs on either of my home hosting machines, 
or my laptop in a pinch, and at least the MINT VM I built for testing reportedly 
runs under Mac VM, whatever comes with Windows7, and VMware (I think on VISTA).


Whatever works for you, either way will work, but I don't want to ever find out 
that an update to SElinux changed behavior, or glibc was patched to a "more 
correct" but non-working state. The right solution is the one which uses the 
least of your time in this case.


--
Bill Davidsen 
  "We have more to fear from the bungling of the incompetent than from
the machinations of the wicked."  - from Slashdot

--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org


Installing MATE

2012-09-16 Thread Bill Davidsen
I got some questions about MATE and wanted to install it and actually see how it 
worked. I started with a machine on fc17, which had Cinnamon and XFCE installed. 
After doing the yum install, I don't see MATE in the list of managers available 
at login. Before I spend a lot of time in documentation, it this normal? Does it 
not drop in like KDE, etc?


--
Bill Davidsen 
  "We have more to fear from the bungling of the incompetent than from
the machinations of the wicked."  - from Slashdot
--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org


GRUB2 Default Partition

2012-09-16 Thread Mike Dwiggins
Does anyone know how to change the default boot partition in GRUB2. I 
have stared at the setups until my eyes crossed and cannot find it.


Of course it is probably so obvious I will Kick myself.

Mike

--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org


Re: start SSHD in services

2012-09-16 Thread Ed Greshko
On 09/17/2012 03:11 AM, jdow wrote:
> On 2012/09/16 10:08, Arthur Dent wrote:
>> On Sun, 2012-09-16 at 13:00 -0400, Jim wrote:
>>> Fedora 17
>>> SSHD is not in or started in Services , how do I start it ?
>>
>> As root:
>> systemctl enable sshd.service (to ensure it starts at boot time)
>> systemctl start sshd.service (to start it)
>> systemctl restart sshd.service (to restart it)
>> systemctl stop sshd.service (to stop it)
>>
>> I still find this a useful resource:
>> http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/SysVinit_to_Systemd_Cheatsheet
>>
>> Hope that helps...
>>
>> Mark
>
> Gee, they could make for even more keyboarding my requiring an essay
> about why you need this action to take place followed by the word
> "please". They screwed up. (hint, isn't the ".service" suffix rather
> redundantly needless repetition?)
>

tab completion works very well.

systemc(tab) en(tab) ssh(tab)

-- 
Programming today is a race between software engineers striving to build bigger 
and better idiot-proof programs, and the Universe trying to produce bigger and 
better idiots. So far, the Universe is winning. -- Rick Cook, The Wizardry 
Compiled
-- 
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org


Re: Installing MATE

2012-09-16 Thread Ed Greshko
On 09/17/2012 08:29 AM, Bill Davidsen wrote:
> I got some questions about MATE and wanted to install it and actually see how 
> it worked. I started with a machine on fc17, which had Cinnamon and XFCE 
> installed. After doing the yum install, I don't see MATE in the list of 
> managers available at login. Before I spend a lot of time in documentation, 
> it this normal? Does it not drop in like KDE, etc?
>

MATE is not currently in the Fedora repositories.

To install, follow the instructions at http://wiki.mate-desktop.org/download  
  Which are...

yum install 
https://dl.dropbox.com/u/49862637/Mate-desktop/mate-desktop-fedora-updates/16/noarch/mate-desktop-release-16-6.fc16.noarch.rpm

yum groupinstall MATE-Desktop

FYI http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/MATE-Desktop  contains the 
status for inclusion of MATE in F18.

-- 
Programming today is a race between software engineers striving to build bigger 
and better idiot-proof programs, and the Universe trying to produce bigger and 
better idiots. So far, the Universe is winning. -- Rick Cook, The Wizardry 
Compiled
-- 
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org


Re: GRUB2 Default Partition

2012-09-16 Thread G.Wolfe Woodbury
On 09/16/2012 08:59 PM, Mike Dwiggins wrote:
> Does anyone know how to change the default boot partition in GRUB2. I
> have stared at the setups until my eyes crossed and cannot find it.
>
> Of course it is probably so obvious I will Kick myself.
set root=(hd0,msdos1)

will often do the thing, may need to change the numbers.  These are
often hidden inside a
grub2 find statement.
This sets the boot partition, and names used in the "linux" kernel;
specification are given
in realation to this root.

Then in the "linux" kernel line, the root=/dev/sd?? is used to set the
system root.

linux vmlinxuz- ro root=/dev/sda3 []*


HTH

-- 
G.Wolfe Woodbury

-- 
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org


Re: Installing MATE

2012-09-16 Thread Ed Greshko
On 09/17/2012 09:35 AM, Ed Greshko wrote:
> On 09/17/2012 08:29 AM, Bill Davidsen wrote:
>> I got some questions about MATE and wanted to install it and actually see 
>> how it worked. I started with a machine on fc17, which had Cinnamon and XFCE 
>> installed. After doing the yum install, I don't see MATE in the list of 
>> managers available at login. Before I spend a lot of time in documentation, 
>> it this normal? Does it not drop in like KDE, etc?
>>
> MATE is not currently in the Fedora repositories.
>
> To install, follow the instructions at http://wiki.mate-desktop.org/download  
>   Which are...
>
> yum install 
> https://dl.dropbox.com/u/49862637/Mate-desktop/mate-desktop-fedora-updates/16/noarch/mate-desktop-release-16-6.fc16.noarch.rpm
>
> yum groupinstall MATE-Desktop
>
> FYI http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/MATE-Desktop  contains the 
> status for inclusion of MATE in F18.
>

I erred in giving you the instructions for F16  So, just replace 6 with 7 
or go to their instructions.  :-)

-- 
Programming today is a race between software engineers striving to build bigger 
and better idiot-proof programs, and the Universe trying to produce bigger and 
better idiots. So far, the Universe is winning. -- Rick Cook, The Wizardry 
Compiled
-- 
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org