Re: iptables systemd services fail

2011-11-18 Thread Michael Schwendt
On Thu, 17 Nov 2011 19:52:00 -0700, TCH (T.C.) wrote:

> > # systemctl status iptables.service
> > #iptables.service - IPv4 firewall with iptables
> >          Loaded: loaded (/lib/systemd/system/iptables.service; enabled)
> >          Active: failed since Thu, 17 Nov 2011 18:19:23 +0100; 2min 31s ago
> >         Process: 1003 ExecStart=/usr/libexec/iptables.init start 
> > (code=exited, status=1/FAILURE)
> >          CGroup: name=systemd:/system/iptables.service
> >
> > Once logged in, I can start it manually without problems. SELinux is not
> > the culprit. The services fail also when running permissive mode. It seems
> > as if it's another race between systemd services.
> 
> What does syslog say around the time iptables.service is started on
> boot?  You should get some sort of error out of iptables.init.

None.  Else I wouldn't be asking. ;)

boot.log says "Started System Logging Service." only after the failed
iptables start.

Guess I'll need to compare carefully with another F16 installation
if I find the time. And perhaps turn off updates-testing on my main
desktop. Too many test updates again and not enough time to test
them painstakingly before they get pushed to stable.
-- 
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines


rpmbuild provides seems broken

2011-11-18 Thread Karl
I have a small library RPM which built OK on Fedora 13 but is broken on Fedora 
16.  Rpmbuild reports that the shared library in the package is required by 
the package itself.  There is no "Provides" line, and when I try to install 
the RPM it reports: 

error: Failed dependencies:
libglv.so.0()(64bit) is needed by libglv0-0.3.1-1.x86_64

If I run /usr/lib/rpm/find-provides manually on the libraries it reports the 
correct information:

libglv.so.0()(64bit)


Here is the build output:

$ rpmbuild -bb glv.spec
Executing(%prep): /bin/sh -e /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.x2bz7z
+ umask 022
+ cd /home/karl/src/rpm/BUILD
+ cd /home/karl/src/rpm/BUILD
+ rm -rf libglv-0.3.1
+ /usr/bin/gzip -dc /home/karl/src/rpm/SOURCES/libglv-0.3.1.tar.gz
+ /bin/tar -xf -
+ STATUS=0
+ '[' 0 -ne 0 ']'
+ cd libglv-0.3.1
+ /bin/chmod -Rf a+rX,u+w,g-w,o-w .
+ exit 0
Executing(%build): /bin/sh -e /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.l6ENXV
+ umask 022
+ cd /home/karl/src/rpm/BUILD
+ cd libglv-0.3.1
+ make -C x11
make: Entering directory `/home/karl/src/rpm/BUILD/libglv-0.3.1/x11'
gcc -c -fPIC -Wall -W -Wno-unused-parameter -O3 -DUSE_XF86VMODE -o glv.o -I. 
glv.c
gcc -o libglv.so.0.3 -Wl,-soname,libglv.so.0 -shared glv.o  -lXxf86vm
ln -sf libglv.so.0.3 libglv.so.0
ln -sf libglv.so.0.3 libglv.so
make: Leaving directory `/home/karl/src/rpm/BUILD/libglv-0.3.1/x11'
+ exit 0
Executing(%install): /bin/sh -e /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.I2Hazi
+ umask 022
+ cd /home/karl/src/rpm/BUILD
+ cd libglv-0.3.1
+ mkdir -p /home/karl/src/rpm/BUILDROOT/libglv0-0.3.1-1.x86_64/usr/lib64
+ mkdir -p /home/karl/src/rpm/BUILDROOT/libglv0-0.3.1-1.x86_64/usr/include/GL
+ install -m 644 x11/glv.h x11/glv_keys.h 
/home/karl/src/rpm/BUILDROOT/libglv0-0.3.1-1.x86_64/usr/include/GL
+ install -m 644 x11/libglv.so.0.3 
/home/karl/src/rpm/BUILDROOT/libglv0-0.3.1-1.x86_64/usr/lib64
+ ln -s libglv.so.0.3 
/home/karl/src/rpm/BUILDROOT/libglv0-0.3.1-1.x86_64/usr/lib64/libglv.so.0
+ ln -s libglv.so.0.3 
/home/karl/src/rpm/BUILDROOT/libglv0-0.3.1-1.x86_64/usr/lib64/libglv.so
+ /usr/lib/rpm/brp-compress
+ /usr/lib/rpm/brp-strip /usr/bin/strip
+ /usr/lib/rpm/brp-strip-static-archive /usr/bin/strip
+ /usr/lib/rpm/brp-strip-comment-note /usr/bin/strip /usr/bin/objdump
Processing files: libglv0-0.3.1-1.x86_64
Executing(%doc): /bin/sh -e /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.k414sF
+ umask 022
+ cd /home/karl/src/rpm/BUILD
+ cd libglv-0.3.1
+ 
DOCDIR=/home/karl/src/rpm/BUILDROOT/libglv0-0.3.1-1.x86_64/usr/share/doc/libglv0-0.3.1
+ export DOCDIR
+ /bin/mkdir -p 
/home/karl/src/rpm/BUILDROOT/libglv0-0.3.1-1.x86_64/usr/share/doc/libglv0-0.3.1
+ cp -pr ChangeLog LICENSE README 
/home/karl/src/rpm/BUILDROOT/libglv0-0.3.1-1.x86_64/usr/share/doc/libglv0-0.3.1
+ exit 0
Requires(interp): /sbin/ldconfig /sbin/ldconfig
Requires(rpmlib): rpmlib(CompressedFileNames) <= 3.0.4-1 
rpmlib(PayloadFilesHavePrefix) <= 4.0-1
Requires(post): /sbin/ldconfig
Requires(postun): /sbin/ldconfig
Requires: libglv.so.0()(64bit)
Checking for unpackaged file(s): /usr/lib/rpm/check-files 
/home/karl/src/rpm/BUILDROOT/libglv0-0.3.1-1.x86_64
Wrote: /home/karl/src/rpm/RPMS/x86_64/libglv0-0.3.1-1.x86_64.rpm
Executing(%clean): /bin/sh -e /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.G7KuTp
+ umask 022
+ cd /home/karl/src/rpm/BUILD
+ cd libglv-0.3.1
+ rm -rf /home/karl/src/rpm/BUILDROOT/libglv0-0.3.1-1.x86_64
+ exit 0


-Karl
-- 
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines


Re: rpmbuild provides seems broken

2011-11-18 Thread Michael Schwendt
On Fri, 18 Nov 2011 02:26:20 -0800, K (Karl) wrote:

> I have a small library RPM which built OK on Fedora 13 but is broken on 
> Fedora 
> 16.  Rpmbuild reports that the shared library in the package is required by 
> the package itself.  There is no "Provides" line, and when I try to install 
> the RPM it reports: 
> 
> error: Failed dependencies:
> libglv.so.0()(64bit) is needed by libglv0-0.3.1-1.x86_64
> 
> If I run /usr/lib/rpm/find-provides manually on the libraries it reports the 
> correct information:
> 
> libglv.so.0()(64bit)

Is this with or without package "redhat-rpm-config" installed?
If without it, could be a bug -> http://bugz.fedoraproject.org/rpm

-- 
Fedora release 16 (Verne) - Linux 3.1.1-2.fc16.x86_64
loadavg: 0.01 0.07 0.07
-- 
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines


Re: Fedora 16 and switchable graphics - ATI Radeon HD 6600M video(Sony VAIO SA25GB)

2011-11-18 Thread Marko Vojinovic
On Thursday 17 November 2011 19:20:49 ferna...@lozano.eti.br wrote:
> - The VAIO notebook doesn't have a BIOS option to turn off the ATI video.
> But it has a "stamina/speed" tootle on the keyboard. Under Windows,
> changing the toogle makes the screen go blank for a few seconds and back,
> supposedly to change the video driver. I tried to keep the tootle on
> "stamina" and reboot, then I created a xorg.conf for the intel video
> driver. Didn't worked.

Exactly *how* it didn't work? Any error messages? What do you see on the 
screen?

> (But is "intel" the correct Xorg driver for the
> Intel HD graphics from the sandy bridge chipset?)

I take it you have modified your xorg.conf to to use "intel" as the driver?

As an alternative, why don't you delete/rename the xorg.conf, reboot without 
it, and let X configure itself automatically? Then look inside 
/var/log/Xorg.0.log to see what driver is in use.

After that you can generate an xorg.conf file (if you have a need for it) using 
the "Xorg -configure". You need to do it as root, it will create the file in 
your current directory, and then you can tweak it to taste and move it to 
/etc/X11/ where it belongs.

> - I tried keeping the tootle on "speed" and created a xorg.conf using the
> driver "radeon". (This is the open source driver, right?) But it didn't
> worked.

Ditto as for the intel above.
 
As a general note, /var/log/Xorg.0.log is a very good source of information 
about what is actually going on with X and you can look inside for any errors, 
warnings, and other reports which might give you a clue about the problem.

Try to describe what doesn't work for you in more detail, and maybe even post 
your X log file on pastebin or whereever, and give us a link to look at it.

HTH, :-)
Marko




-- 
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines


Re: [389-users] Master caught in infinite loop

2011-11-18 Thread Rich Megginson
On 11/18/2011 05:08 AM, Daniel Fenert wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm using 389ds 1.2.5 with replication, my current setup:
>
> Master
> | \
> L1 L2
> | \|  \
> S1 S2 S3  S4
>
> L* - acting as slave to "master" and master to "S*"
> S* - slaves to L*
>
>
>  From time to time (usually few months between problems) we encounter
> "master" going to some infinite loop.
> After analyzing access log, it looks like it stops doing queries, and
> accepts new connections until it runs out of fd's.
> After that, it won't stop peacefully, only SIGKILL saves the day.
>
> Workload:
> Master is used only for updates, maybe 20 connections/s.
> L* are used only for replication.
> All bind's and search queries are targeted to S* which are read only.
>
> With previous setup (less complicated), we've also seen this problem:
> Master
> |  |  |  \
> S1 S2 S3  S4...
>
> Is there a chance that upgrading to latest version will fix the problem?
> Were there any fixes nearby? Upgrade will be complex as hell ;)
>
> Error log from last problem:
>   - Not listening for new connections - too many fds open
Have you tried increasing the number of fds to 8192?
>   - slapd shutting down - signaling operation threads
>   - slapd shutting down - waiting for 120 threads to terminate
Does the server shutdown on its own, or did you shut it down normally 
(i.e. service dirsrv stop)?
> ... SIGKILL ...
>   - 389-Directory/1.2.5 B2010.012.2034 starting up
>   - Detected Disorderly Shutdown last time Directory Server was running,
> recovering database.
>   - slapd started.  Listening on All Interfaces port 389 for LDAP requests
>
> Number of fds: 4096.
Since 1.2.5 we have fixed a number of bugs around connection handling.  
You might find that 1.2.9.9 (current stable version) works much better 
for you.
--
389 users mailing list
389-us...@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/389-users

Re: [389-users] Multiple threads simultaneously working on connection's private buffer causes ns-slapd to abort

2011-11-18 Thread Rich Megginson
On 11/18/2011 05:31 AM, "Reddy, Gandikota Rushendra (ES&N)" 
 wrote:


This was a bounce - please check your list membership before posting again.

On a multi CPU system, ns-slapd process aborts. Stack trace says it aborted 
calling PR_ASSERT() at the following location in connection.c (Release version 
of 389 dirsrv is 1.2.0).
Is there any chance you could attempt to reproduce this issue with the 
latest 1.2.9.9 (stable) or 1.2.10.a5 (testing)? Or provide a 
reproducer.  1.2.0 is quite old.


Also, please file a bug at 
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=389

-
Connection.c
1690 int connection_read_operation(Connection *conn, Operation *op, ber_tag_t 
*tag, int *remaining_data)
1691 {

1734 }
1735 /* If we still haven't seen a complete PDU, read from the network 
*/
1736 while (*tag == LBER_DEFAULT) {
1737 int ioblocktimeout_waits = config_get_ioblocktimeout() / 
CONN_TURBO_TIMEOUT_INTERVAL;
1738 /* We should never get here with data remaining in the 
buffer */
1739 PR_ASSERT( !new_operation || 0 == (conn->c_private->c_buffer_bytes 
- conn->c_private->c_buffer_offset) );<-- aborted calling PR_ASSERT()
1740 /* We make a non-blocking read call */
-

Using instrumented image I have collected data and found that:

While a thread is working on connection's private buffer, another thread which 
belongs to older connection makes the connection readable again by modifying 
c_gettingber to zero.
This results in waking up one more thread. Finally more than one thread works 
simultaneously on connection's private buffer and results in aborting ns-slapd.


It happens as below:

1. Thead X is working on Connection-1's last opereration.

2. After performing the LDAP operation ( connection_dispatch_operation() ) 
decrementes the connection's c_refcnt  by calling connection_release_nolock() 
in connection_threadmain() function.

3. Since this is the last operation, c_refcnt becomes zero.

4. Thread X yet to execute the code that updates c_threadnumber and  
c_gettingber. But as soon as c_refcnt of the connection becomes zero, main 
thread allocates the same connection object/structure to new incoming 
connection connection-2.  Thread-Y started executing operation belongs to this 
newer connection (Connection-2).

-
connection.c

2008 static void
2009 connection_threadmain()
2010 {


2187 if (!thread_turbo_flag&&  !more_data) {
2188 connection_release_nolock 
(conn);<--  Thread-X decremented c_refcnt and now c_refcnt = 0
2189 }
2190 PR_Unlock( conn->c_mutex );
2191 }
2192 /* Since we didn't do so earlier, we need to make a 
replication connection readable again here */
2193 if ( ((1 == is_timedout) || (replication_connection&&  
!thread_turbo_flag))&&  !more_data)
2194 connection_make_readable(conn);
2195 pb = NULL;
2196
2197 if (!thread_turbo_flag&&  !more_data) { /* Don't do this 
in turbo mode */
2198 PR_Lock( conn->c_mutex );
2199 /* if the threadnumber of now below the maximum, 
wakeup
2200  * the listener thread so that we start polling on 
this
2201  * connection again
2202  */
2203 /* DBDB I think this code is bogus -- we already 
signaled the listener above here */
2204 if (conn->c_threadnumber == 
config_get_maxthreadsperconn())
2205 need_wakeup = 1;
2206 else
2207 need_wakeup = 0;
2208 conn->c_threadnumber--;
2209 PR_Unlock( conn->c_mutex );
2210
2211 if (need_wakeup)
2212 signal_listner();
2213 }
2214
2215
2216 } /* while (1) */
2217 }


5. Thread-Y started processing operation data belongs to newer connection 
Connection-2  (connection_read_operation() ).

6. Now Thread-X of connection-1 called make_connection_readable() and made the 
connection readable again by setting c_gettingbuffer to 0.

7. This wakes up another thread of connection-2 and it too starts processing 
operation data (connection_read_operation() ).

8. So at this point of time more than one thread is working on connection's 
private data.

9. As two threads are working on the connections c_buffer, c_bufferbytes and 
c_offset, at some time it meats conditions to abort() at the following location:

Connection.c:  connection_read_operation()

1734 }
1735 /* If we still haven't seen a complete PDU, read from the network 
*/
1736 while (*tag == LBER_DEFAULT) {
1737 int ioblocktimeout_wa

Re: gnome-terminal "paint" issues?

2011-11-18 Thread Brian Ericson
Thanks for the reply!  I should mention I'm on f16.  Interestingly, this 
seems to happen more frequently the larger the terminal window is.  It's 
easily reproduced doing repeated "ls -d .??*"s and I've also noticed 
that if I wait long enough (upwards of two minutes), it'll repaint on 
its own, but it always repaints instantly if I hit enter again.

I'm using a plain bash shell with a default .bash_profile and an 
uninspiring .bashrc.  The shell is to the local machine.  The profile 
settings for gnome-terminal are unaltered (the "Default" profile) save 
that I don't display the menu bar (not that this changes anything).

TERM is set to xterm (same as on other machines I have f16 on that don't 
exhibit this issue) and both COLUMNS & LINES change when the window is 
resized.  stty -a settings are unaltered from the default (and match the 
other machines' settings).  This particular machine uses the English 
(Dvorak) layout which it inherits from the system as I pass 
KEYTABLE=dvorak to the kernel (my other machines have Dvorak keyboards 
and, consequently, are set to English (US)).

I went so far as to create a new user to see if the user would exhibit 
the same issues (and set that user's layout to English (US)), and the 
new user has the same issues.  As an aside, did you know that if you 
create or delete user using the "Users and Groups" application, it logs 
you out of your session?!

The onscreen keyboard (funnily in QWERTY), doesn't appear to have this 
issue, if that helps.

On 11/17/2011 05:22 PM, Deron Meranda wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 17, 2011 at 4:59 PM, Brian Ericson  wrote:
>> I'm having "one-off" issues with gnome-terminal on my laptop.  At the
>> bottom of the terminal, the results of a command typically (but not
>> always) don't display until I hit "enter" a second time and PgUp/PgDown
>> in man pages or vim oftentimes don't do anything (then, when the key is
>> hit again, the result will be 2x rather than 1x).
>>
>> Anyone know what might cause this?
> I don't know, but here's a few things that may give you or others here a clue:
>
> Also, are you only logged into the local machine just using a plain
> bash shell, or are you say ssh'ed into another? Or using the
> "screen(1)" command? Or using a keyboard KVM switch?
>
> Look at your terminal profile preferences, and in particular under
> scrolling see if "scroll on keystrokes" is checked.
>
> Check your $TERM environment variable.
>
> If you resize the terminal window (and press enter), do the values for
> the environment variables $COLUMNS and $LINES change?
>
> What are your terminal device settings?  Run: stty -a
>
> Are you using any Gnome universal access features, or have perhaps
> changed your Compose key binding or other keyboard layout settings?
>
> You can also try using the on-screen keyboard and see if it behaves
> differently than your real keyboard (pull down the Gnome Universal
> Access menu from the gnome bar at the top right and choose "Screen
> Keyboard").
>
-- 
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines


Re: Is android linux done right?

2011-11-18 Thread Ian Malone
On 18 November 2011 06:44, Skunk Worx  wrote:

> maybe even to the point of accessing the various app stores?

You mean Yum?

-- 
imalone
-- 
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines


Re: Is android linux done right?

2011-11-18 Thread Rex Dieter
Skunk Worx wrote:

> Android may be the fastest growing linux distribution in history.
...
> Could this be a future version of Fedora?

Not realistically, too many parts of android are nonfree, iirc.

-- rex

-- 
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines


Re: Is android linux done right?

2011-11-18 Thread Tom Horsley
On Fri, 18 Nov 2011 11:14:38 -0600
Rex Dieter wrote:

> > Could this be a future version of Fedora?  
> 
> Not realistically, too many parts of android are nonfree, iirc.

Too many parts of android are left out as well. Try
to run a IP stack over bluetooth, or connect a USB or
bluetooth keyboard for easy typing, or setup different
proxy services for different wifi connections, etc.
The list is endless, and you'll always wind up tracking
down obscure 3rd party apps that may or may not work
and may or may not require a rooted phone.
-- 
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines


System hang under F16

2011-11-18 Thread Bill Murray
   Dear Fedora group,
   Yesterday I updated the lastest F16 fixes. E.g. 
mesa-dri-drivers-7.11-11.fc16.i686

today, twice, the system has hung completely as I opened a
new window. The new window was different on the two occasions;
emacs last time.
   /var/log/messages has nothing in it.

How should I debug?
  Bill
Kernel: 3.1.1-1.fc16.x86_64
 > lsmod
Module  Size  Used by
tcp_lp  2111  0
ebtable_nat 1967  0
ebtables   21732  1 ebtable_nat
ipt_MASQUERADE  2248  3
iptable_nat 4687  1
nf_nat 18606  2 ipt_MASQUERADE,iptable_nat
xt_CHECKSUM 1277  2
iptable_mangle  1663  1
tun14111  2
bridge 72375  0
stp 1927  1 bridge
llc 4754  2 bridge,stp
libafs658715  2
bnep   14195  2
bluetooth 202902  7 bnep
lockd  70080  0
nf_conntrack_netbios_ns 1265  0
xt_physdev  1715  1
nf_conntrack_broadcast 1319  1 nf_conntrack_netbios_ns
nf_conntrack_ipv4   8310  29 iptable_nat,nf_nat
ip6t_REJECT 4008  2
nf_defrag_ipv4  1513  1 nf_conntrack_ipv4
nf_conntrack_ipv6   7714  25
nf_defrag_ipv6  9115  1 nf_conntrack_ipv6
xt_state1306  51
nf_conntrack   67597  8 
ipt_MASQUERADE,iptable_nat,nf_nat,nf_conntrack_netbios_ns,nf_conntrack_broadcast,nf_conntrack_ipv4,nf_conntrack_ipv6,xt_state
ip6table_filter 1655  1
ip6_tables 16776  1 ip6table_filter
fuse   61671  5
gspca_ov51930064  0
gspca_main 18860  1 gspca_ov519
videodev   78689  1 gspca_main
media  11511  1 videodev
v4l2_compat_ioctl32 7665  1 videodev
snd_usb_audio 105329  2
snd_usbmidi_lib18071  1 snd_usb_audio
snd_rawmidi19878  1 snd_usbmidi_lib
snd_hda_codec_analog82289  1
snd_hda_intel  24072  2
snd_hda_codec  85181  2 snd_hda_codec_analog,snd_hda_intel
snd_hwdep   6264  2 snd_usb_audio,snd_hda_codec
snd_seq52186  0
snd_seq_device  5941  2 snd_rawmidi,snd_seq
e1000e174876  0
snd_pcm78498  3 snd_usb_audio,snd_hda_intel,snd_hda_codec
hp_wmi  8103  0
sparse_keymap   3358  1 hp_wmi
rfkill 16336  3 bluetooth,hp_wmi
ppdev   7360  0
snd_timer  19372  2 snd_seq,snd_pcm
snd63124  19 
snd_usb_audio,snd_usbmidi_lib,snd_rawmidi,snd_hda_codec_analog,snd_hda_intel,snd_hda_codec,snd_hwdep,snd_seq,snd_seq_device,snd_pcm,snd_timer
soundcore   6267  1 snd
parport_pc 19600  0
snd_page_alloc  7311  2 snd_hda_intel,snd_pcm
parport32310  2 ppdev,parport_pc
iTCO_wdt   12024  0
microcode  18539  0
iTCO_vendor_support 2578  1 iTCO_wdt
tpm_infineon6962  0
serio_raw   4298  0
virtio_net 12856  0
kvm_intel 119162  0
kvm   328030  1 kvm_intel
nls_utf81389  1
sunrpc201219  2 lockd
udf66472  0
crc_itu_t   1547  1 udf
uinput  7230  0
binfmt_misc 6983  1
usb_storage45966  4
pata_acpi   3419  0
uas 7775  0
wmi 9049  1 hp_wmi
ata_generic 3587  0
i915  389602  2
drm_kms_helper 26490  1 i915
drm   194476  3 i915,drm_kms_helper
i2c_algo_bit4958  1 i915
i2c_core   25728  5 
videodev,i915,drm_kms_helper,drm,i2c_algo_bit
video  12388  1 i915


-- 
Bill Murray    ATLAS
STFC RAL at: Bat 161 1-08, CERN,1211 Meyrin, Geneve 23, Switzerland
   Tel:- CERN +41 22 7670631or  RAL +44 (0)1235 446256

-- 
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines


SystemD Resolved

2011-11-18 Thread Fedora User
After all my kvetching, it turns out that systemd is really pretty easy
to administer. SOME techs have a tendency to write documentation that
is rather esoteric. I think that I likened the 49 man pages for systemd
to Talmudic study.

This could use a graphical application to create the necessary links. I
was lost because of being accustomed to SysV for more than a decade. My
concern is that a new user migrating from windows would be equally
lost. This could also use a SIMPLE guide for end users who would
ordinarily manage just the multi-user and graphical target.wants.
-- 
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines


RAID0 and Fedora 16 / f16

2011-11-18 Thread Mark W. Jeanmougin
Hey guys,

Long time user, first time caller. I've been using Fedora since it was
RH4. Many box sets later, I find myself with an issue I can't solve.
Even Google isn't helping me out much.

In previous (pre-F14) versions, I partition (msdos, not GPT) my
systems something like this:

# fdisk -l /dev/sda
Disk /dev/sda: 2000.4 GB, 2000398934016 bytes
255 heads, 63 sectors/track, 243201 cylinders, total 3907029168 sectors
Units = sectors of 1 * 512 = 512 bytes
Sector size (logical/physical): 512 bytes / 512 bytes
I/O size (minimum/optimal): 512 bytes / 512 bytes
Disk identifier: 0x9e218bdf

   Device Boot  Start End  Blocks   Id  System
/dev/sda1   *  63  530144  265041   fd  Linux raid autodetect
/dev/sda2  5301458443763941953747+  fd  Linux raid autodetect
/dev/sda484437640  3907024064  1911293212+   5  Extended
/dev/sda584437703  3907024064  1911293181   fd  Linux raid autodetect

sdb is setup identically. The idea is that sd[ab]1 is a RAID1
containing /boot. sd[ab]2 is another RAID1 containing an LVM VG which
contains the rest of the OS. Most of the time, the rest of the space
on the system is a final RAID1 for data. Sometimes, I'll have a RAID0
if performance is more important than uptime.

Here's the mdadm config:

# cat /proc/mdstat
Personalities : [raid1] [raid6] [raid5] [raid4]

md2 : active raid1 sda5[0] sdb5[1]
  1911292021 blocks super 1.2 [2/2] [UU]

md1 : active raid1 sda2[0] sdb2[1]
  41952651 blocks super 1.2 [2/2] [UU]

md0 : active raid1 sda1[0] sdb1[1]
  264960 blocks [2/2] [UU]

unused devices: 

Then, here's what the (non-data) filesystems look like:

[root@blu images]# df -h
FilesystemSize  Used Avail Use% Mounted on
/dev/mapper/vg_blu0-lv_root
  786M  635M  112M  86% /
tmpfs 5.9G  2.2M  5.9G   1% /dev/shm
/dev/mapper/vg_blu0-lv_tmp
  1.5G   40M  1.5G   3% /tmp
/dev/mapper/vg_blu0-lv_var
  1.5G  765M  638M  55% /var
/dev/mapper/vg_blu0-lv_usr
   14G   11G  3.0G  78% /usr
/dev/md0  251M  144M   82M  64% /boot
/dev/mapper/vg_blu0-lv_home
  5.0G  4.1G  656M  87% /home

So, under Fedora 16, I'm trying to duplicate this. I saw in the docs
that /usr shouldn't be split from /. OK. So, increase the size of
lv_root, and get rid of lv_usr. No big deal.

For my install, I setup (GPT, by default) partition tables with a
simplified version of above:

/dev/mapper/vg00-lv_root 2.0G on /
/dev/md0 on /boot

That's it.

sda1 is a 1049kB partition for "bios_grub". md0 is a raid1 of sda3
sdb2. md1 is sdb1 & sda2. Then, md1 holds the vg00. This is about as
simple as I can make it.

During the install, I select: Install boot loader on /dev/sda. Minimal
Install. Then I get a Warning "There was an error installing the
bootloader. The system may not be bootable". Looking at the other
virtual consoles shows me:

Alt-F3:
INFO storage: bootloader stage1 target device is sda
INFO storage: bootloader stage2 target device is md0
[Ed: Which is odd since I chose sda for the installation target in the
earlier step]

Alt-F5:
/sbin/grub2-setup: warn: This GPT partition label has no BIOS Boot
Partition; embedding won't be possible!.
/sbin/grub2-setup: error: embedding is not possible, but this is
required when the root device is on a RAID array or LVM volume.
Generating grub.cfg ...
Found linux image: /boot/vmlinux-3.1.0-7.fc16_x86_64
Found initrd image: /boot/initramfs-3.1.0-7.fc16_x86_64
done
Installation finished. No error reported.
/sbin/grub2-setup: warn: This GPT partition label has no BIOS Boot
Partition; embedding won't be possible!.
/sbin/grub2-setup: error: embedding is not possible, but this is
required when the root device is on a RAID array or LVM volume.

I know to let the RAID's finish building before I reboot, so that's not it.

After the reboot I get:
GRUB  loading.
Welcome to GRUB!

error: no such device: 71ec265a-f934-40a6-b02d-3ff3a274d229.
Entering rescue mode...
grub rescue>

ls just shows "(hd0)". It doesn't show any partitions.

set shows:
prefix=(hd0)/grub2
root=hd0

"insmod normal" says "error: unknown filesystem."

I've tried "set prefix=(hd0,0)/grub2", then "insmod normal". That
gives "error: no such partition". I've tried passing 0, 1, and 2 as
values for the partition. They all give the same value.

I'm really not sure where to go from here. I can't believe I'm the
first person to do mdadm RAID1 under F16.

If I do a "default" partitioning installation, then everything works
fine, but I don't get RAID1. Or, any RAID at all. Just an LV spanning
my drives.

Finally, this behavior is consistent on physical hardware and in a VM under KVM.

How do I install onto RAID 1?

Thanks in advance,

MJ
-- 
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/

Re: SystemD Resolved

2011-11-18 Thread Joe Zeff
On 11/18/2011 10:36 AM, Fedora User wrote:
>   I think that I likened the 49 man pages for systemd
> to Talmudic study.

I wouldn't go quite that far.  I haven't examined those pages, yet, 
because I haven't moved from F 14 to F 16, yet.  (I'll probably do my 
laptop on Sunday, followed by the desktop if all goes well.)  However, 
my suspicion is that they suffer mostly from being written by people who 
know the software inside and out and not getting edited by outsiders for 
clarity.  To study Talmud, you really need to know how to split hairs 
with a microtome.
-- 
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines


Re: [389-users] Master caught in infinite loop

2011-11-18 Thread Daniel Fenert
W dniu 2011-11-18 14:42, Rich Megginson pisze:
> On 11/18/2011 05:08 AM, Daniel Fenert wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> I'm using 389ds 1.2.5 with replication, my current setup:
>>
>> Master
>> | \
>> L1 L2
>> | \|  \
>> S1 S2 S3  S4
>>
>> L* - acting as slave to "master" and master to "S*"
>> S* - slaves to L*
>>
>>
>>  From time to time (usually few months between problems) we encounter
>> "master" going to some infinite loop.
>> After analyzing access log, it looks like it stops doing queries, and
>> accepts new connections until it runs out of fd's.
>> After that, it won't stop peacefully, only SIGKILL saves the day.
>>
>> Workload:
>> Master is used only for updates, maybe 20 connections/s.
>> L* are used only for replication.
>> All bind's and search queries are targeted to S* which are read only.
>>
>> With previous setup (less complicated), we've also seen this problem:
>> Master
>> |  |  |  \
>> S1 S2 S3  S4...
>>
>> Is there a chance that upgrading to latest version will fix the problem?
>> Were there any fixes nearby? Upgrade will be complex as hell ;)
>>
>> Error log from last problem:
>>   - Not listening for new connections - too many fds open
> Have you tried increasing the number of fds to 8192?

Yes, but it doesn't make sense - during normal operation master uses no 
more than 50-60 fd's.

>>   - slapd shutting down - signaling operation threads
>>   - slapd shutting down - waiting for 120 threads to terminate
> Does the server shutdown on its own, or did you shut it down normally 
> (i.e. service dirsrv stop)?

We have tried to stop it using init.d scripts.

>> ... SIGKILL ...
>>   - 389-Directory/1.2.5 B2010.012.2034 starting up
>>   - Detected Disorderly Shutdown last time Directory Server was running,
>> recovering database.
>>   - slapd started.  Listening on All Interfaces port 389 for LDAP 
>> requests
>>
>> Number of fds: 4096.
> Since 1.2.5 we have fixed a number of bugs around connection 
> handling.  You might find that 1.2.9.9 (current stable version) works 
> much better for you.

OK, we'll try to upgrade.

How to upgrade such complex setup?
Should we try top-to-bottom approach (master first, then L*, then S*) or 
bottom-to-top (S*, L*, master last)?
Shutting down all servers is not really an option.

-- 
Daniel Fenert
--
389 users mailing list
389-us...@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/389-users

Re: [389-users] Master caught in infinite loop

2011-11-18 Thread Rich Megginson
On 11/18/2011 11:46 AM, Daniel Fenert wrote:
> W dniu 2011-11-18 14:42, Rich Megginson pisze:
>> On 11/18/2011 05:08 AM, Daniel Fenert wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> I'm using 389ds 1.2.5 with replication, my current setup:
>>>
>>> Master
>>> | \
>>> L1 L2
>>> | \|  \
>>> S1 S2 S3  S4
>>>
>>> L* - acting as slave to "master" and master to "S*"
>>> S* - slaves to L*
>>>
>>>
>>>  From time to time (usually few months between problems) we encounter
>>> "master" going to some infinite loop.
>>> After analyzing access log, it looks like it stops doing queries, and
>>> accepts new connections until it runs out of fd's.
>>> After that, it won't stop peacefully, only SIGKILL saves the day.
>>>
>>> Workload:
>>> Master is used only for updates, maybe 20 connections/s.
>>> L* are used only for replication.
>>> All bind's and search queries are targeted to S* which are read only.
>>>
>>> With previous setup (less complicated), we've also seen this problem:
>>> Master
>>> |  |  |  \
>>> S1 S2 S3  S4...
>>>
>>> Is there a chance that upgrading to latest version will fix the 
>>> problem?
>>> Were there any fixes nearby? Upgrade will be complex as hell ;)
>>>
>>> Error log from last problem:
>>>   - Not listening for new connections - too many fds open
>> Have you tried increasing the number of fds to 8192?
>
> Yes, but it doesn't make sense - during normal operation master uses 
> no more than 50-60 fd's.
Right.  I'm not suggesting this is the root cause of the problem, but 
increasing the number of fds could help reduce the occurance of the problem.
>
>>>   - slapd shutting down - signaling operation threads
>>>   - slapd shutting down - waiting for 120 threads to terminate
>> Does the server shutdown on its own, or did you shut it down normally 
>> (i.e. service dirsrv stop)?
>
> We have tried to stop it using init.d scripts.
120 threads?  Did you increase nsslapd-threadnumber?
If not, then I'm very curious about what all those threads are doing.
>
>>> ... SIGKILL ...
>>>   - 389-Directory/1.2.5 B2010.012.2034 starting up
>>>   - Detected Disorderly Shutdown last time Directory Server was 
>>> running,
>>> recovering database.
>>>   - slapd started.  Listening on All Interfaces port 389 for LDAP 
>>> requests
>>>
>>> Number of fds: 4096.
>> Since 1.2.5 we have fixed a number of bugs around connection 
>> handling.  You might find that 1.2.9.9 (current stable version) works 
>> much better for you.
>
> OK, we'll try to upgrade.
>
> How to upgrade such complex setup?
> Should we try top-to-bottom approach (master first, then L*, then S*) 
> or bottom-to-top (S*, L*, master last)?
bottom to top
> Shutting down all servers is not really an option.
>

--
389 users mailing list
389-us...@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/389-users

Re: gnome-terminal "paint" issues?

2011-11-18 Thread Deron Meranda
So you have other F16 systems that do not exhibit this bahavior, and
from what you can tell all the settings are the same between both?
That is strange.

By chance, are you seeing any repainting issues in any other applications?

You might try a different terminal program and see if it has a similar
issue. You may need to install a terminal program with yum. There's
always the old trusty "xterm", but you may also like "lilyterm" as it
is more like gnome-terminal (UTF-8, multiple tabs, etc.).

-- 
Deron Meranda
http://deron.meranda.us/
-- 
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines


Re: SystemD Resolved

2011-11-18 Thread Rahul Sundaram
On 11/19/2011 12:06 AM, Fedora User wrote:

> This could use a graphical application to create the necessary links. I
> was lost because of being accustomed to SysV for more than a decade. My
> concern is that a new user migrating from windows would be equally
> lost. This could also use a SIMPLE guide for end users who would
> ordinarily manage just the multi-user and graphical target.wants.

https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Systemd covers only the basics and should
help you as well.   Man pages are not guides.  They are reference material.

Rahul

-- 
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines


Re: SystemD Resolved

2011-11-18 Thread Deron Meranda
> is rather esoteric. I think that I likened the 49 man pages for systemd
> to Talmudic study.

Yes, the man pages are pretty dense to just jump into.


There are other easier documentation though:

The Fedora online manual:
  http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Systemd

The SysV to Systemd cheat sheet:
  http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/SysVinit_to_Systemd_Cheatsheet

And there's lots of documentation, FAQs and such on the systemd project page:
  http://freedesktop.org/wiki/Software/systemd

-- 
Deron Meranda
http://deron.meranda.us/
-- 
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines


Re: SystemD Resolved

2011-11-18 Thread Tom Horsley
On Fri, 18 Nov 2011 14:42:52 -0500
Deron Meranda wrote:

> Yes, the man pages are pretty dense to just jump into.

So, speaking of systemd, is there any way to ask the question:

"Why the heck is this service running?"

If I look at my system, I see the pcscd (smartcard) service
running.

It isn't "wanted" in the symlinks. If I grep the systemd
units, I don't find any other service that references it,
yet, there it is running when I look at all the processes.
-- 
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines


build gcc-4.4 on F15/16?

2011-11-18 Thread Neal Becker
I'm trying to install cuda sdk.  It needs gcc<=4.4.

I grabbed gcc-4.4.6

gcc fails to link:


gcc  -g -fkeep-inline-functions -DIN_GCC   -W -Wall -Wwrite-strings -Wstrict-
prototypes -Wmissing-prototypes -Wcast-qual -Wold-style-definition -Wc++-compat 
-Wmissing-format-attribute -pedantic -Wno-long-long -Wno-variadic-macros -Wno-
overlength-strings -fno-common  -DHAVE_CONFIG_H  -o cc1-dummy c-lang.o stub-
objc.o attribs.o c-errors.o c-lex.o c-pragma.o c-decl.o c-typeck.o c-convert.o 
c-aux-info.o c-common.o c-opts.o c-format.o c-semantics.o c-ppoutput.o c-
cppbuiltin.o c-objc-common.o c-dump.o c-pch.o c-parser.o i386-c.o c-gimplify.o 
tree-mudflap.o c-pretty-print.o c-omp.o dummy-checksum.o   main.o 
tree-browser.o 
libbackend.a ../libcpp/libcpp.a ../libdecnumber/libdecnumber.a 
../libcpp/libcpp.a   ../libiberty/libiberty.a ../libdecnumber/libdecnumber.a -
L/lib -lcloog  -lmpfr -lppl -lgmpxx -lgmp 
/usr/bin/ld: libbackend.a(graphite.o): undefined reference to symbol 
'ppl_finalize'
/usr/bin/ld: note: 'ppl_finalize' is defined in DSO /usr/lib64/libppl_c.so.4 so 
try adding it to the linker command line
/usr/lib64/libppl_c.so.4: could not read symbols: Invalid operation
collect2: ld returned 1 exit status

OK, let's add -lppl_c:

[nbecker@nbecker6 gcc]$ gcc  -g -fkeep-inline-functions -DIN_GCC   -W -Wall -
Wwrite-strings -Wstrict-prototypes -Wmissing-prototypes -Wcast-qual -Wold-style-
definition -Wc++-compat -Wmissing-format-attribute -pedantic -Wno-long-long -
Wno-variadic-macros -Wno-overlength-strings -fno-common  -DHAVE_CONFIG_H  -o 
cc1-dummy c-lang.o stub-objc.o attribs.o c-errors.o c-lex.o c-pragma.o c-decl.o 
c-typeck.o c-convert.o c-aux-info.o c-common.o c-opts.o c-format.o 
c-semantics.o 
c-ppoutput.o c-cppbuiltin.o c-objc-common.o c-dump.o c-pch.o c-parser.o 
i386-c.o 
c-gimplify.o tree-mudflap.o c-pretty-print.o c-omp.o dummy-checksum.o   main.o 
tree-browser.o libbackend.a ../libcpp/libcpp.a ../libdecnumber/libdecnumber.a 
../libcpp/libcpp.a   ../libiberty/libiberty.a ../libdecnumber/libdecnumber.a -
L/lib -lcloog  -lmpfr -lppl_c -lgmpxx -lgmp 
/usr/lib/gcc/x86_64-redhat-linux/4.6.1/../../../../lib64/libppl_c.so: undefined 
reference to 
`std::__detail::_List_node_base::swap(std::__detail::_List_node_base&, 
std::__detail::_List_node_base&)@GLIBCXX_3.4.15'
/usr/lib/gcc/x86_64-redhat-linux/4.6.1/../../../../lib64/libppl_c.so: undefined 
reference to 
`std::__detail::_List_node_base::_M_transfer(std::__detail::_List_node_base*, 
std::__detail::_List_node_base*)@GLIBCXX_3.4.15'
/usr/lib/gcc/x86_64-redhat-linux/4.6.1/../../../../lib64/libppl_c.so: undefined 
reference to `std::__detail::_List_node_base::_M_unhook()@GLIBCXX_3.4.15'
/usr/lib/gcc/x86_64-redhat-linux/4.6.1/../../../../lib64/libppl_c.so: undefined 
reference to 
`std::__detail::_List_node_base::_M_hook(std::__detail::_List_node_base*)@GLIBCXX_3.4.15'
/usr/lib/gcc/x86_64-redhat-linux/4.6.1/../../../../lib64/libppl_c.so: undefined 
reference to `std::ctype::_M_widen_init() const@GLIBCXX_3.4.11'
collect2: ld returned 1 exit status

Now what's that about?  glibcxx_3.4.15?

-- 
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines


Re: SystemD Resolved

2011-11-18 Thread Deron Meranda
On Fri, Nov 18, 2011 at 2:55 PM, Tom Horsley  wrote:
> On Fri, 18 Nov 2011 14:42:52 -0500
> So, speaking of systemd, is there any way to ask the question:
>
> "Why the heck is this service running?"
>
> If I look at my system, I see the pcscd (smartcard) service
> running.
>
> It isn't "wanted" in the symlinks. If I grep the systemd
> units, I don't find any other service that references it,
> yet, there it is running when I look at all the processes.

systemctl status pcscd.service

grep pcscd /lib/systemd/system/*.service


Does that work, or are you asking something more?
-- 
Deron Meranda
http://deron.meranda.us/
-- 
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines


Re: SystemD Resolved

2011-11-18 Thread Tom Horsley
On Fri, 18 Nov 2011 15:02:11 -0500
Deron Meranda wrote:

> systemctl status pcscd.service
> 
> grep pcscd /lib/systemd/system/*.service
> 
> 
> Does that work, or are you asking something more?

[root@zooty ~]# systemctl status pcscd.service
pcscd.service - PC/SC Smart Card Daemon
  Loaded: loaded (/lib/systemd/system/pcscd.service; disabled)
  Active: active (running) since Fri, 18 Nov 2011 04:02:03 -0500; 11h 
ago
Main PID: 9613 (pcscd)
  CGroup: name=systemd:/system/pcscd.service
  â 9613 /usr/sbin/pcscd -f

That tells me it is running despite being disabled.

[root@zooty ~]# grep pcscd /lib/systemd/system/*.service
/lib/systemd/system/pcscd.service:Requires=pcscd.socket
/lib/systemd/system/pcscd.service:ExecStart=/usr/sbin/pcscd -f
/lib/systemd/system/pcscd.service:ExecReload=/usr/sbin/pcscd -H
/lib/systemd/system/pcscd.service:Also=pcscd.socket

That tells me no other service asks for it to be started 
(directly, anyway).

So, I'm still wondering why the heck it is running.
-- 
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines


Kate Advanced editor.

2011-11-18 Thread Lucélio Gomes de Freitas

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256

Hi fellows,

What package I have to install in F16, to get Kate Advanced editor?

Thx,

- -- 
Lucélio Gomes de Freitas
ETFCSF-> U.G.F.-> P.U.C.(RJ)
Engº, Analista Suporte(Free Mind).
Email: aa.luce...@gmail.com
Tel: 55 0XX 21 85964911

-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Fedora - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/

iF4EAREIAAYFAk7Gvb8ACgkQENqGaHfBA/dw7QD/eb/ihTVjMGb/LGgelVxeMVex
i0ZoJ+miE2r2gN1kuDQA/Aw5LNpbDttSI98xzGI71FxXgszRzOdj9xGW8+ARxJ1U
=dgBD
-END PGP SIGNATURE-

-- 
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines


Kate Advanced editor.

2011-11-18 Thread Lucélio Gomes de Freitas

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256

Hi fellows,

What package I have to install in F16, to get Kate Advanced editor?

Thx,

- -- 
Lucélio Gomes de Freitas
ETFCSF-> U.G.F.-> P.U.C.(RJ)
Engº, Analista Suporte(Free Mind).
Email: aa.luce...@gmail.com
Tel: 55 0XX 21 85964911

-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Fedora - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/

iF4EAREIAAYFAk7Gvb8ACgkQENqGaHfBA/dw7QEAiQhSQRDrqtoFNxruCfwOBH5/
CnKzb/JVnjCaQyuCaQABAImU5HBHgrRAT3XY4In7GB3rZu1oiqWMtA+c1sfBhZ3S
=Bje4
-END PGP SIGNATURE-

-- 
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines


Re: rpmbuild provides seems broken

2011-11-18 Thread Karl
On Friday, November 18, 2011 12:16:49 PM Michael Schwendt wrote:
> Is this with or without package "redhat-rpm-config" installed?
> If without it, could be a bug -> http://bugz.fedoraproject.org/rpm


There is no redhat-rpm-config package on my system.


-Karl

-- 
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines


Re: Kate Advanced editor.

2011-11-18 Thread Fulko Hew
2011/11/18 Lucélio Gomes de Freitas 

>
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA256
>
> Hi fellows,
>
> What package I have to install in F16, to get Kate Advanced editor?
>

$ yum whatprovides "*bin/kate"

should tell you.
-- 
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines


Re: RAID0 and Fedora 16 / f16

2011-11-18 Thread Roberto Ragusa
On 11/18/2011 07:39 PM, Mark W. Jeanmougin wrote:
> sda1 is a 1049kB partition for "bios_grub". md0 is a raid1 of sda3
> sdb2. md1 is sdb1 & sda2. Then, md1 holds the vg00. This is about as
> simple as I can make it.

Just my two cents.
Wouldn't have been wiser to partition the two disks with the same layout?
That is, create a 1049kB sdb1 (even if unused) and keep sda2+sdb2 and sda3+sdb3.
It would be more confusing for the administrator, and it would make easier
to exchange the roles of the disks in the future.
I would also suggestion to call sda+sdb3 as md3 as so on. There is no rule
that you must have md0, then md1, then md2; having just md2 and md3 would be
simpler.

Apart from this "good practice" considerations, I don't think to have
great suggestions for you about the grub2 problems.

> During the install, I select: Install boot loader on /dev/sda. Minimal
> Install. Then I get a Warning "There was an error installing the
> bootloader. The system may not be bootable". Looking at the other
> virtual consoles shows me:
> 
> Alt-F3:
> INFO storage: bootloader stage1 target device is sda
> INFO storage: bootloader stage2 target device is md0
> [Ed: Which is odd since I chose sda for the installation target in the
> earlier step]
> 
> Alt-F5:
> /sbin/grub2-setup: warn: This GPT partition label has no BIOS Boot
> Partition; embedding won't be possible!.

Is the GPT sda1 correctly marked for boot?

-- 
   Roberto Ragusamail at robertoragusa.it
-- 
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines


Re: rpmbuild provides seems broken

2011-11-18 Thread Michael Schwendt
On Fri, 18 Nov 2011 12:21:54 -0800, K (Karl) wrote:

> > Is this with or without package "redhat-rpm-config" installed?
> > If without it, could be a bug -> http://bugz.fedoraproject.org/rpm
> 
> 
> There is no redhat-rpm-config package on my system.

Try to reproduce _after_ installing redhat-rpm-config. That package
is used by the Fedora Build System, too, so building without it might
have been tested less. And it would still be a bug to report.
-- 
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines


Re: Kate Advanced editor.

2011-11-18 Thread Michael Schwendt
On Fri, 18 Nov 2011 18:19:28 -0200, LGDF (Lucélio) wrote:

> What package I have to install in F16, to get Kate Advanced editor?

"yum search kate" does work, doesn't it?

Even "yum search kate advanced editor" might work. ;)

-- 
Fedora release 16 (Verne) - Linux 3.1.1-1.fc16.x86_64
loadavg: 0.33 0.17 0.09
-- 
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines


Re: build gcc-4.4 on F15/16?

2011-11-18 Thread Michael Schwendt
On Fri, 18 Nov 2011 14:56:51 -0500, NB (Neal) wrote:

> I'm trying to install cuda sdk.  It needs gcc<=4.4.
> 
> I grabbed gcc-4.4.6
> 
> gcc fails to link:
> 
> 
> gcc  -g -fkeep-inline-functions -DIN_GCC   -W -Wall -Wwrite-strings -Wstrict-
> prototypes -Wmissing-prototypes -Wcast-qual -Wold-style-definition 
> -Wc++-compat 
> -Wmissing-format-attribute -pedantic -Wno-long-long -Wno-variadic-macros -Wno-
> overlength-strings -fno-common  -DHAVE_CONFIG_H  -o cc1-dummy c-lang.o stub-
> objc.o attribs.o c-errors.o c-lex.o c-pragma.o c-decl.o c-typeck.o 
> c-convert.o 
> c-aux-info.o c-common.o c-opts.o c-format.o c-semantics.o c-ppoutput.o c-
> cppbuiltin.o c-objc-common.o c-dump.o c-pch.o c-parser.o i386-c.o 
> c-gimplify.o 
> tree-mudflap.o c-pretty-print.o c-omp.o dummy-checksum.o   main.o 
> tree-browser.o 
> libbackend.a ../libcpp/libcpp.a ../libdecnumber/libdecnumber.a 
> ../libcpp/libcpp.a   ../libiberty/libiberty.a ../libdecnumber/libdecnumber.a -
> L/lib -lcloog  -lmpfr -lppl -lgmpxx -lgmp 
> /usr/bin/ld: libbackend.a(graphite.o): undefined reference to symbol 
> 'ppl_finalize'
> /usr/bin/ld: note: 'ppl_finalize' is defined in DSO /usr/lib64/libppl_c.so.4 
> so 
> try adding it to the linker command line
> /usr/lib64/libppl_c.so.4: could not read symbols: Invalid operation
> collect2: ld returned 1 exit status
> 
> OK, let's add -lppl_c:
> 
> [nbecker@nbecker6 gcc]$ gcc  -g -fkeep-inline-functions -DIN_GCC   -W -Wall -
> Wwrite-strings -Wstrict-prototypes -Wmissing-prototypes -Wcast-qual 
> -Wold-style-
> definition -Wc++-compat -Wmissing-format-attribute -pedantic -Wno-long-long -
> Wno-variadic-macros -Wno-overlength-strings -fno-common  -DHAVE_CONFIG_H  -o 
> cc1-dummy c-lang.o stub-objc.o attribs.o c-errors.o c-lex.o c-pragma.o 
> c-decl.o 
> c-typeck.o c-convert.o c-aux-info.o c-common.o c-opts.o c-format.o 
> c-semantics.o 
> c-ppoutput.o c-cppbuiltin.o c-objc-common.o c-dump.o c-pch.o c-parser.o 
> i386-c.o 
> c-gimplify.o tree-mudflap.o c-pretty-print.o c-omp.o dummy-checksum.o   
> main.o 
> tree-browser.o libbackend.a ../libcpp/libcpp.a ../libdecnumber/libdecnumber.a 
> ../libcpp/libcpp.a   ../libiberty/libiberty.a ../libdecnumber/libdecnumber.a -
> L/lib -lcloog  -lmpfr -lppl_c -lgmpxx -lgmp 
> /usr/lib/gcc/x86_64-redhat-linux/4.6.1/../../../../lib64/libppl_c.so: 
> undefined 
> reference to 
> `std::__detail::_List_node_base::swap(std::__detail::_List_node_base&, 
> std::__detail::_List_node_base&)@GLIBCXX_3.4.15'
> /usr/lib/gcc/x86_64-redhat-linux/4.6.1/../../../../lib64/libppl_c.so: 
> undefined 
> reference to 
> `std::__detail::_List_node_base::_M_transfer(std::__detail::_List_node_base*, 
> std::__detail::_List_node_base*)@GLIBCXX_3.4.15'
> /usr/lib/gcc/x86_64-redhat-linux/4.6.1/../../../../lib64/libppl_c.so: 
> undefined 
> reference to `std::__detail::_List_node_base::_M_unhook()@GLIBCXX_3.4.15'
> /usr/lib/gcc/x86_64-redhat-linux/4.6.1/../../../../lib64/libppl_c.so: 
> undefined 
> reference to 
> `std::__detail::_List_node_base::_M_hook(std::__detail::_List_node_base*)@GLIBCXX_3.4.15'
> /usr/lib/gcc/x86_64-redhat-linux/4.6.1/../../../../lib64/libppl_c.so: 
> undefined 
> reference to `std::ctype::_M_widen_init() const@GLIBCXX_3.4.11'
> collect2: ld returned 1 exit status
> 
> Now what's that about?  glibcxx_3.4.15?

No, libstdc++. Have you tried g++ rather than gcc yet?

-- 
Fedora release 16 (Verne) - Linux 3.1.1-1.fc16.x86_64
loadavg: 0.00 0.07 0.07
-- 
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines


NIC interface names

2011-11-18 Thread Boris Epstein
Hello listmates,

I recently installed Fedora 16 as a guest VM under VirtualBox and instead
of the usual eth0/eth1 etc. names I got the following:

[root@ipa-test0 ~]# ifconfig
loLink encap:Local Loopback
  inet addr:127.0.0.1  Mask:255.0.0.0
  inet6 addr: ::1/128 Scope:Host
  UP LOOPBACK RUNNING  MTU:16436  Metric:1
  RX packets:12 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:0
  TX packets:12 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0
  collisions:0 txqueuelen:0
  RX bytes:812 (812.0 b)  TX bytes:812 (812.0 b)

p2p1  Link encap:Ethernet  HWaddr 08:00:27:1C:C1:37
  inet addr:10.0.2.15  Bcast:10.0.2.255  Mask:255.255.255.0
  inet6 addr: fe80::a00:27ff:fe1c:c137/64 Scope:Link
  UP BROADCAST RUNNING MULTICAST  MTU:1500  Metric:1
  RX packets:1653 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:0
  TX packets:890 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0
  collisions:0 txqueuelen:1000
  RX bytes:1488287 (1.4 MiB)  TX bytes:58177 (56.8 KiB)

p7p1  Link encap:Ethernet  HWaddr 08:00:27:D2:29:56
  inet6 addr: fe80::a00:27ff:fed2:2956/64 Scope:Link
  UP BROADCAST RUNNING MULTICAST  MTU:1500  Metric:1
  RX packets:0 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:0
  TX packets:43 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0
  collisions:0 txqueuelen:1000
  RX bytes:0 (0.0 b)  TX bytes:13122 (12.8 KiB)

[root@ipa-test0 ~]#

Any idea where these strange names come from and what the significance of
them is?

Thanks.

Boris.
-- 
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines


Re: rpmbuild provides seems broken

2011-11-18 Thread Karl
There is no change in behavior with the redhat-rpm-config installed.

I also notice there is no difference in output using the rpmbuild -vv option.  
Is there some other way to see what rpmbuild is actually executing?


-Karl


-- 
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines


Re: Kate Advanced editor.

2011-11-18 Thread Lucélio Gomes de Freitas

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256

Thank you,

Sorry for the silly question, "yum search kate" solved the mistery.
 
The package is "kate.x86_64".

Thanks again.

Em 18-11-2011 18:40, Michael Schwendt escreveu:
> On Fri, 18 Nov 2011 18:19:28 -0200, LGDF (Lucélio) wrote:
>
>> What package I have to install in F16, to get Kate Advanced
>> editor?
>
> "yum search kate" does work, doesn't it?
>
> Even "yum search kate advanced editor" might work. ;)
>

- -- 
Lucélio Gomes de Freitas
ETFCSF-> U.G.F.-> P.U.C.(RJ)
Engº, Analista Suporte(Free Mind).
Email: aa.luce...@gmail.com
Tel: 55 0XX 21 85964911
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Fedora - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/

iF4EAREIAAYFAk7Gx/4ACgkQENqGaHfBA/drngD9H/4C5ELfcYBGc3mF0Kdqk6uE
wL6yMUG16o2S9UX6vCQA/1PQktXl5oteZJpyEBq7/BRRp5Uz+oMMtWKnW26/bQL9
=Iukv
-END PGP SIGNATURE-

-- 
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines


Re: SystemD Resolved

2011-11-18 Thread Deron Meranda
On Fri, Nov 18, 2011 at 3:16 PM, Tom Horsley  wrote:
> On Fri, 18 Nov 2011 15:02:11 -0500
> Deron Meranda wrote:
>
>> systemctl status pcscd.service
>>
>> grep pcscd /lib/systemd/system/*.service
>>
>>
>> Does that work, or are you asking something more?
>
> [root@zooty ~]# systemctl status pcscd.service
> pcscd.service - PC/SC Smart Card Daemon
>          Loaded: loaded (/lib/systemd/system/pcscd.service; disabled)
>          Active: active (running) since Fri, 18 Nov 2011 04:02:03 -0500; 11h 
> ago
>        Main PID: 9613 (pcscd)
>          CGroup: name=systemd:/system/pcscd.service
>                  â 9613 /usr/sbin/pcscd -f
>
> That tells me it is running despite being disabled.
>
> [root@zooty ~]# grep pcscd /lib/systemd/system/*.service
> /lib/systemd/system/pcscd.service:Requires=pcscd.socket
> /lib/systemd/system/pcscd.service:ExecStart=/usr/sbin/pcscd -f
> /lib/systemd/system/pcscd.service:ExecReload=/usr/sbin/pcscd -H
> /lib/systemd/system/pcscd.service:Also=pcscd.socket
>
> That tells me no other service asks for it to be started
> (directly, anyway).
>
> So, I'm still wondering why the heck it is running.

Good question. I'm neither a systemd or pcscd expert.

But from what I can tell, pcscd is started by a "trigger", rather than
by a "runlevel". What happens is that systemd creates a Unix-domain
socket for pcscd to eventually communicate with applications which use
it. But the pcscd daemon process itself is not started right away.

Instead systemd detects when an application attempts to connect to
that Unix-domain socket, and at that time will start the pcscd
process, passing it the socket descriptor. So in effect pcscd is
started only when it is needed by an application.  I can't tell you
want that application is though.

The creation of the socket and the launching of the daemon are two
separate systemd units:

   systemctl status pcscd.socket
   systemctl status pcscd.service


Also see 
http://ludovicrousseau.blogspot.com/2011/11/pcscd-auto-start-using-systemd.html
-- 
Deron Meranda
http://deron.meranda.us/
-- 
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines


Re: SystemD Resolved

2011-11-18 Thread Lucélio Gomes de Freitas
Uau... Good...

Em 18-11-2011 19:03, Deron Meranda escreveu:
> On Fri, Nov 18, 2011 at 3:16 PM, Tom Horsley  wrote:
>> On Fri, 18 Nov 2011 15:02:11 -0500
>> Deron Meranda wrote:
>>
>>> systemctl status pcscd.service
>>>
>>> grep pcscd /lib/systemd/system/*.service
>>>
>>>
>>> Does that work, or are you asking something more?
>> [root@zooty ~]# systemctl status pcscd.service
>> pcscd.service - PC/SC Smart Card Daemon
>>  Loaded: loaded (/lib/systemd/system/pcscd.service; disabled)
>>  Active: active (running) since Fri, 18 Nov 2011 04:02:03 -0500; 11h 
>> ago
>>Main PID: 9613 (pcscd)
>>  CGroup: name=systemd:/system/pcscd.service
>>  â 9613 /usr/sbin/pcscd -f
>>
>> That tells me it is running despite being disabled.
>>
>> [root@zooty ~]# grep pcscd /lib/systemd/system/*.service
>> /lib/systemd/system/pcscd.service:Requires=pcscd.socket
>> /lib/systemd/system/pcscd.service:ExecStart=/usr/sbin/pcscd -f
>> /lib/systemd/system/pcscd.service:ExecReload=/usr/sbin/pcscd -H
>> /lib/systemd/system/pcscd.service:Also=pcscd.socket
>>
>> That tells me no other service asks for it to be started
>> (directly, anyway).
>>
>> So, I'm still wondering why the heck it is running.
> Good question. I'm neither a systemd or pcscd expert.
>
> But from what I can tell, pcscd is started by a "trigger", rather than
> by a "runlevel". What happens is that systemd creates a Unix-domain
> socket for pcscd to eventually communicate with applications which use
> it. But the pcscd daemon process itself is not started right away.
>
> Instead systemd detects when an application attempts to connect to
> that Unix-domain socket, and at that time will start the pcscd
> process, passing it the socket descriptor. So in effect pcscd is
> started only when it is needed by an application.  I can't tell you
> want that application is though.
>
> The creation of the socket and the launching of the daemon are two
> separate systemd units:
>
>systemctl status pcscd.socket
>systemctl status pcscd.service
>
>
> Also see 
> http://ludovicrousseau.blogspot.com/2011/11/pcscd-auto-start-using-systemd.html

-- 
Lucélio Gomes de Freitas
ETFCSF-> U.G.F.-> P.U.C.(RJ)
Engº, Analista Suporte(Free Mind).
Email: aa.luce...@gmail.com
Tel: 55 0XX 21 85964911

-- 
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines


Re: NIC interface names

2011-11-18 Thread Michael Cronenworth
Boris Epstein wrote:
> Any idea where these strange names come from and what the significance
> of them is?

It was a Fedora 15 Feature.

http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/ConsistentNetworkDeviceNaming
-- 
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines


Re: System hang under F16

2011-11-18 Thread Maciek Borzecki
On Fri, Nov 18, 2011 at 7:20 PM, Bill Murray  wrote:
>   Dear Fedora group,
>               Yesterday I updated the lastest F16 fixes. E.g.
> mesa-dri-drivers-7.11-11.fc16.i686
>
> today, twice, the system has hung completely as I opened a
> new window. The new window was different on the two occasions;
> emacs last time.
>   /var/log/messages has nothing in it.
Try to disable alll forms of compositing, i.e. if using gnome shell
switch to fallback mode, if KDE, disable all desktop effects.

maciek
-- 
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines


Re: NIC interface names

2011-11-18 Thread Boris Epstein
On Fri, Nov 18, 2011 at 4:19 PM, Michael Cronenworth wrote:

> Boris Epstein wrote:
> > Any idea where these strange names come from and what the significance
> > of them is?
>
> It was a Fedora 15 Feature.
>
> http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/ConsistentNetworkDeviceNaming
> --
>

Michael, thanks. Actually I like this feature.

However, the question is: I've got another Fedora 16 / 32 bit machine
installed under VirtualBox, and it has your regular eth0. How could that be?

Boris.
-- 
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines


Re: NIC interface names

2011-11-18 Thread Michael Cronenworth
Boris Epstein wrote:
> However, the question is: I've got another Fedora 16 / 32 bit machine
> installed under VirtualBox, and it has your regular eth0. How could that be?

Is your VM originally F16 or was it upgraded from a previous Fedora? 
Fedora saves the device name once you install Fedora so it will remain 
the same name even with this new feature.

Look to see if you have this file:
/etc/udev/rules.d/70-persistent-net.rules

Fedora saves your network card name in there. You can either remove it 
to have it generate a new name or edit it to what you want.
-- 
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines


Re: NIC interface names

2011-11-18 Thread Boris Epstein
On Fri, Nov 18, 2011 at 4:42 PM, Michael Cronenworth wrote:

> Boris Epstein wrote:
> > However, the question is: I've got another Fedora 16 / 32 bit machine
> > installed under VirtualBox, and it has your regular eth0. How could that
> be?
>
> Is your VM originally F16 or was it upgraded from a previous Fedora?
> Fedora saves the device name once you install Fedora so it will remain
> the same name even with this new feature.
>
> Look to see if you have this file:
> /etc/udev/rules.d/70-persistent-net.rules
>
> Fedora saves your network card name in there. You can either remove it
> to have it generate a new name or edit it to what you want.
> --
>

Both are original installations.
-- 
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines


Re: RAID0 and Fedora 16 / f16

2011-11-18 Thread Mark W. Jeanmougin
On Fri, Nov 18, 2011 at 15:36, Roberto Ragusa  wrote:
> On 11/18/2011 07:39 PM, Mark W. Jeanmougin wrote:
>> sda1 is a 1049kB partition for "bios_grub". md0 is a raid1 of sda3
>> sdb2. md1 is sdb1 & sda2. Then, md1 holds the vg00. This is about as
>> simple as I can make it.
>
> Just my two cents.
> Wouldn't have been wiser to partition the two disks with the same layout?
> That is, create a 1049kB sdb1 (even if unused) and keep sda2+sdb2 and 
> sda3+sdb3.
> It would be more confusing for the administrator, and it would make easier
> to exchange the roles of the disks in the future.
> I would also suggestion to call sda+sdb3 as md3 as so on. There is no rule
> that you must have md0, then md1, then md2; having just md2 and md3 would be
> simpler.

That's my preference as well. I "kept it simple" for the purposes of
filing this bug report list posting.

>> During the install, I select: Install boot loader on /dev/sda. Minimal
>> Install. Then I get a Warning "There was an error installing the
>> bootloader. The system may not be bootable". Looking at the other
>> virtual consoles shows me:
>>
>> Alt-F3:
>> INFO storage: bootloader stage1 target device is sda
>> INFO storage: bootloader stage2 target device is md0
>> [Ed: Which is odd since I chose sda for the installation target in the
>> earlier step]
>>
>> Alt-F5:
>> /sbin/grub2-setup: warn: This GPT partition label has no BIOS Boot
>> Partition; embedding won't be possible!.
>
> Is the GPT sda1 correctly marked for boot?

Here's what "parted /dev/sda print" has to say:
Number Start End Size File system Name Flags
1 1049kB 2097kB 1049kB [NULL] [NULL] bios_grub
2 2097kB 5245MB 5243MB [NULL] [NULL] raid
3 10.5GB 11.0GB 524MB ext4 "software RAID" boot

So, it looks like sda3 is set to boot. So, I changed it so that sda1
has the boot flag. That also cleared the "bios_grub" flag on sda1.
Then, I removed the boot flag from sda3. It's still doing the same
thing:
error: no such device: 71ec265a-f934-40a6-b02d-3ff3a274d229

Ideas?

MJ
-- 
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines


mozilla-https-everywhere causes Firefox to freeze up regularly

2011-11-18 Thread Andre Robatino
I tried this addon a few weeks ago in F15, uninstalled it after experiencing
frequent Firefox freezeups, then tried again with F16. The same thing still
happens with mozilla-https-everywhere-1.1-1.fc16.noarch. There are currently no
bugs reported against it. Is anyone else seeing this?

-- 
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines


Re: rpmbuild provides seems broken

2011-11-18 Thread Michael Schwendt
On Fri, 18 Nov 2011 13:00:08 -0800, K (Karl) wrote:

> There is no change in behavior with the redhat-rpm-config installed.
> 
> I also notice there is no difference in output using the rpmbuild -vv option. 
>  
>

Then your packaging is broken.

> + install -m 644 x11/libglv.so.0.3 
> /home/karl/src/rpm/BUILDROOT/libglv0-0.3.1-1.x86_64/usr/lib64

Should be mode 0755.  If that doesn't fix it, try to make available the src.rpm
somewhere.
-- 
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines


mozilla-https-everywhere causes Firefox to freeze up regularly

2011-11-18 Thread Andre Robatino
Andre Robatino  fedoraproject.org> writes:

> I tried this addon a few weeks ago in F15, uninstalled it after experiencing
> frequent Firefox freezeups, then tried again with F16. The same thing still
> happens with mozilla-https-everywhere-1.1-1.fc16.noarch. There are currently 
> no
> bugs reported against it. Is anyone else seeing this?

This time, even after uninstalling and restarting Firefox, I'm still seeing
freezeups. I hope it's not permanent.




-- 
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines


Re: NIC interface names

2011-11-18 Thread Michael Cronenworth
Boris Epstein wrote:
> Both are original installations.

I think it depends on the network card that you're exposing to the VM or 
are the VMs using the same network adapter type? (The "fake" adapter 
model.) Otherwise, I really wouldn't know why.
-- 
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines


Re: rpmbuild provides seems broken

2011-11-18 Thread Karl
On Friday, November 18, 2011 11:09:55 PM Michael Schwendt wrote:
> > + install -m 644 x11/libglv.so.0.3 
> > /home/karl/src/rpm/BUILDROOT/libglv0-0.3.1-1.x86_64/usr/lib64
> 
> Should be mode 0755.


That fixes the problem.  Thanks for the help.


-Karl


-- 
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines


mozilla-https-everywhere causes Firefox to freeze up regularly

2011-11-18 Thread Andre Robatino
Andre Robatino  fedoraproject.org> writes:

> This time, even after uninstalling and restarting Firefox, I'm still seeing
> freezeups. I hope it's not permanent.

The above should read "after uninstalling mozilla-https-everywhere and
restarting Firefox".

I noticed that even after doing this, under Tools/Add-ons/Extensions, HTTPS
Everywhere was listed. I clicked "Disable", and don't remember if I restarted
Firefox, but when I checked again, the extension was not listed anymore. The
browser seems stable again.



-- 
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines


F15: reboot and poweroff not working

2011-11-18 Thread sean darcy
I'm trying to reboot a remote machine, but no luck:

systemctl --force reboot
Failed to get D-Bus connection: Failed to authenticate in time.

any suggestions?

sean

-- 
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines


[F15] got no sound

2011-11-18 Thread mike lan
Hello
 I got no sound in flash on youtube or when playing a video on vlc

any one please how to trouble shoot this

thanks
-- 
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines


Re: [F15] got no sound

2011-11-18 Thread mike lan
Solved with pavumeter

thanks

On Fri, Nov 18, 2011 at 11:20 PM, mike lan  wrote:

> Hello
>  I got no sound in flash on youtube or when playing a video on vlc
>
> any one please how to trouble shoot this
>
> thanks
>
-- 
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines


Re: rpmbuild provides seems broken

2011-11-18 Thread Panu Matilainen
On 11/18/2011 12:26 PM, Karl wrote:
> I have a small library RPM which built OK on Fedora 13 but is broken on Fedora
> 16.  Rpmbuild reports that the shared library in the package is required by
> the package itself.  There is no "Provides" line, and when I try to install
> the RPM it reports:
>
>  error: Failed dependencies:
>  libglv.so.0()(64bit) is needed by libglv0-0.3.1-1.x86_64
>
> If I run /usr/lib/rpm/find-provides manually on the libraries it reports the
> correct information:
>
>  libglv.so.0()(64bit)

I see the actual issue got already solved, but just FWIW:

/usr/lib/rpm/find-provides and -requires haven't been used by rpm in 
ages, unless overridden by spec/configuration (and you do not want to do 
that, those old scripts will miss all sorts of things)

These days the equivalent thing to find-provides/requires is running 
/usr/lib/rpm/rpmdeps --provides|--requires, that'll give the same 
results as you'd get while building, unless the spec contains tweaks to 
the dependency generation (it can be filtered, various bits and pieces 
overridden etc).

- Panu -
-- 
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines


Re: Is android linux done right?

2011-11-18 Thread Pete Travis
On Nov 17, 2011 11:44 PM, "Skunk Worx"  wrote:
>
> Android may be the fastest growing linux distribution in history.
>
> Now that Google has open sourced Ice Cream Sandwich, will some linux
> distribution leverage the Android "Java Desktop" just as Android
> leveraged the linux kernel?
>
> Is the Android WM / Compositor so different from X11 that it is simply
> unpossible?
>
> Could an ICS port to X86 use bits of the open source nouveau or radeon
> drivers and thus become a fairly decent decent desktop or laptop OS,
> maybe even to the point of accessing the various app stores?
>
> Could this be a future version of Fedora?
> --
> users mailing list
> users@lists.fedoraproject.org
> To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
> https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
> Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
Android makes an excellent example of how the Linux kernel is versatile
enough to drive application specific solutions tailored to a specific use
case.  The platform's success on mobile hardware doesn't make it well
suited to the desktop.   Fedora makes an excellent admin or development
workstation, but that doesn't mean it is suited for use in point of sale
systems or embedded Linux toasters.  I think its great that products are
becoming more tailored for the way we use them, but I'm not about to jump
on this ridiculous "the desktop is dead" bandwagon that's become popular
linkbait lately.
-- 
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines


Re: System hang under F16

2011-11-18 Thread Deron Meranda
>> today, twice, the system has hung completely as I opened a
>> new window. The new window was different on the two occasions;

I have no idea if it is related, but twice with F16 I've had Gnome
completely lock up. The mouse pointer would move, but otherwise the
screen was completely unresponsive, not even any of the keyboard hot
keys would work (Alt-F*, ctrl-alt-del, etc).

However the OS was still running, and I could ssh in from another
machine. After killing the gnome session processes everything would be
okay, no reboot needed.

When it locked it up I was usually "playing" pretty hard with the
gnome interface, opening and closing windows quickly, etc.  I do use
emacs, but none of my lockups involved interaction with any emacs
windows.

Using gnome-shell-3.2.1-2.fc16.x86_64

-- 
Deron Meranda
http://deron.meranda.us/
-- 
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines


Re: RAID0 and Fedora 16 / f16

2011-11-18 Thread Sam Varshavchik

Mark W. Jeanmougin writes:


# fdisk -l /dev/sda
Disk /dev/sda: 2000.4 GB, 2000398934016 bytes
255 heads, 63 sectors/track, 243201 cylinders, total 3907029168 sectors
Units = sectors of 1 * 512 = 512 bytes
Sector size (logical/physical): 512 bytes / 512 bytes
I/O size (minimum/optimal): 512 bytes / 512 bytes
Disk identifier: 0x9e218bdf

   Device Boot  Start End  Blocks   Id  System
/dev/sda1   *  63  530144  265041   fd  Linux raid autodetect


You need to move up the start of partition up to 2048, from 63. Grub won't  
fit here, as you've discovered.



After the reboot I get:
GRUB  loading.
Welcome to GRUB!

error: no such device: 71ec265a-f934-40a6-b02d-3ff3a274d229.


http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Common_F16_bugs#Cannot_boot_with_.2Fboot_partition_on_a_software_RAID_array

You need to:

1) Move partition 1 to start on logical sector 2048.

2) Use the workaround given there.

Both 1 and 2 are required to fix this. Neither one, by itself, will give you  
something that boots.


If you're doing a fresh install, this shouldn't be too bad. If you're trying  
to salvage a botched upgrade, you have to move up your sd[ab]1, before you  
can do anything. It can be done in rescue mode, but won't be easy. Given the  
size of the /boot partition, the easiest thing to do would probably be to  
temporarily copy /boto to one of your bigger partitions, resize it, and  
restore it.


Sounds easier than it actually is. fdisk won't be able to write out an  
updated partition table if something still has the disk mounted. So, you'll  
have to back up /boot, stop all disk arrays, use fdisk to gingerly remove  
partition 1 from both disks, and add it back it, slightly smaller, assemble  
a new mdraid array, being sure to specify version 1.0 raid superblock. mdadm  
will likely whine that it's still seeing its old superblock, with the wrong  
partition size. Just follow mdadm's instructions to zero it out. Reformat  
the slightly smaller sd[ab]1 as ext[34], start up all the arrays, mount  
everything back up, and restore your former /boot (and update the fstab on  
your root partition, to reflect the new /boot uuid).


Then you should be able to go into chroot /mnt/sysimage, and fix grub as  
instructed on the known issues page. Been there myself, have the wounds to  
prove it…



If I do a "default" partitioning installation, then everything works
fine, but I don't get RAID1. Or, any RAID at all. Just an LV spanning
my drives.


… and you should get rid of LVM as well. It offers very few benefits for a  
generic RAID1 setup, like you have. Just use native primary/extended  
partitions, and mount them directly.


P.S. Your 256mb for /boot is a bit small-ish, these days, too.



pgp0u4hbzL9B5.pgp
Description: PGP signature
-- 
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines


Re: build gcc-4.4 on F15/16?

2011-11-18 Thread Neal Becker
Michael Schwendt wrote:

> On Fri, 18 Nov 2011 14:56:51 -0500, NB (Neal) wrote:
> 
>> I'm trying to install cuda sdk.  It needs gcc<=4.4.
>> 
>> I grabbed gcc-4.4.6
>> 
>> gcc fails to link:
>> 
>> 
>> gcc  -g -fkeep-inline-functions -DIN_GCC   -W -Wall -Wwrite-strings -Wstrict-
>> prototypes -Wmissing-prototypes -Wcast-qual -Wold-style-definition
>> -Wc++-compat -Wmissing-format-attribute -pedantic -Wno-long-long
>> -Wno-variadic-macros -Wno-
>> overlength-strings -fno-common  -DHAVE_CONFIG_H  -o cc1-dummy c-lang.o stub-
>> objc.o attribs.o c-errors.o c-lex.o c-pragma.o c-decl.o c-typeck.o
>> c-convert.o c-aux-info.o c-common.o c-opts.o c-format.o c-semantics.o
>> c-ppoutput.o c- cppbuiltin.o c-objc-common.o c-dump.o c-pch.o c-parser.o
>> i386-c.o c-gimplify.o
>> tree-mudflap.o c-pretty-print.o c-omp.o dummy-checksum.o   main.o
>> tree-browser.o libbackend.a ../libcpp/libcpp.a ../libdecnumber/libdecnumber.a
>> ../libcpp/libcpp.a   ../libiberty/libiberty.a ../libdecnumber/libdecnumber.a
>> -
>> L/lib -lcloog  -lmpfr -lppl -lgmpxx -lgmp
>> /usr/bin/ld: libbackend.a(graphite.o): undefined reference to symbol
>> 'ppl_finalize'
>> /usr/bin/ld: note: 'ppl_finalize' is defined in DSO /usr/lib64/libppl_c.so.4
>> so try adding it to the linker command line
>> /usr/lib64/libppl_c.so.4: could not read symbols: Invalid operation
>> collect2: ld returned 1 exit status
>> 
>> OK, let's add -lppl_c:
>> 
>> [nbecker@nbecker6 gcc]$ gcc  -g -fkeep-inline-functions -DIN_GCC   -W -Wall -
>> Wwrite-strings -Wstrict-prototypes -Wmissing-prototypes -Wcast-qual
>> -Wold-style- definition -Wc++-compat -Wmissing-format-attribute -pedantic
>> -Wno-long-long -
>> Wno-variadic-macros -Wno-overlength-strings -fno-common  -DHAVE_CONFIG_H  -o
>> cc1-dummy c-lang.o stub-objc.o attribs.o c-errors.o c-lex.o c-pragma.o
>> c-decl.o c-typeck.o c-convert.o c-aux-info.o c-common.o c-opts.o c-format.o
>> c-semantics.o c-ppoutput.o c-cppbuiltin.o c-objc-common.o c-dump.o c-pch.o
>> c-parser.o i386-c.o
>> c-gimplify.o tree-mudflap.o c-pretty-print.o c-omp.o dummy-checksum.o  
>> main.o tree-browser.o libbackend.a ../libcpp/libcpp.a
>> ../libdecnumber/libdecnumber.a
>> ../libcpp/libcpp.a   ../libiberty/libiberty.a ../libdecnumber/libdecnumber.a
>> -
>> L/lib -lcloog  -lmpfr -lppl_c -lgmpxx -lgmp
>> /usr/lib/gcc/x86_64-redhat-linux/4.6.1/../../../../lib64/libppl_c.so:
>> undefined reference to
>> `std::__detail::_List_node_base::swap(std::__detail::_List_node_base&,
>> std::__detail::_List_node_base&)@GLIBCXX_3.4.15'
>> /usr/lib/gcc/x86_64-redhat-linux/4.6.1/../../../../lib64/libppl_c.so:
>> undefined reference to
>> `std::__detail::_List_node_base::_M_transfer(std::__detail::_List_node_base*,
>> std::__detail::_List_node_base*)@GLIBCXX_3.4.15'
>> /usr/lib/gcc/x86_64-redhat-linux/4.6.1/../../../../lib64/libppl_c.so:
>> undefined reference to
>> `std::__detail::_List_node_base::_M_unhook()@GLIBCXX_3.4.15'
>> /usr/lib/gcc/x86_64-redhat-linux/4.6.1/../../../../lib64/libppl_c.so:
>> undefined reference to
>> 
`std::__detail::_List_node_base::_M_hook(std::__detail::_List_node_base*)@GLIBCXX_3.4.15'
>> /usr/lib/gcc/x86_64-redhat-linux/4.6.1/../../../../lib64/libppl_c.so:
>> undefined reference to `std::ctype::_M_widen_init()
>> const@GLIBCXX_3.4.11' collect2: ld returned 1 exit status
>> 
>> Now what's that about?  glibcxx_3.4.15?
> 
> No, libstdc++. Have you tried g++ rather than gcc yet?
> 

Sorry, I don't understand.  What do you mean by 'tried g++'?

-- 
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines


yum update killed ssh

2011-11-18 Thread John Wendel
Just a heads up.

I'm pretty sloppy about keeping track of updates, so I don't have the 
details at hand, but the latest update of glibc from updates-testing 
killed ssh and scp.  I guess it happened this morning. Symptom was libc 
reporting ssh freeing bad pointer. Yum downgrade glibc fixed the problem.

Regards,

John
-- 
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines


Re: System hang under F16

2011-11-18 Thread John Wendel
On 11/18/2011 04:18 PM, Deron Meranda wrote:
>>> today, twice, the system has hung completely as I opened a
>>> new window. The new window was different on the two occasions;
> I have no idea if it is related, but twice with F16 I've had Gnome
> completely lock up. The mouse pointer would move, but otherwise the
> screen was completely unresponsive, not even any of the keyboard hot
> keys would work (Alt-F*, ctrl-alt-del, etc).
>
> However the OS was still running, and I could ssh in from another
> machine. After killing the gnome session processes everything would be
> okay, no reboot needed.
>
> When it locked it up I was usually "playing" pretty hard with the
> gnome interface, opening and closing windows quickly, etc.  I do use
> emacs, but none of my lockups involved interaction with any emacs
> windows.
>
> Using gnome-shell-3.2.1-2.fc16.x86_64
>
I've had a few gnome-shell hangs with f16. In all cases, 
ctrl-alt-backspace worked to kill it and it then restarted.

Regards,

John

-- 
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines


Re: yum update killed ssh

2011-11-18 Thread Kevin Fenzi
On Fri, 18 Nov 2011 20:40:11 -0800
John Wendel  wrote:

> Just a heads up.
> 
> I'm pretty sloppy about keeping track of updates, so I don't have the 
> details at hand, but the latest update of glibc from updates-testing 
> killed ssh and scp.  I guess it happened this morning. Symptom was
> libc reporting ssh freeing bad pointer. Yum downgrade glibc fixed the
> problem.

You should be able to look at yum history or /var/log/yum for versions. 

The odd thing is that there hasn't been an updates-testing glibc for
quite a while. There's one pending today, but it's not yet pushed. 

kevin


signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
-- 
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines


Re: System hang under F16

2011-11-18 Thread Deron Meranda
> I've had a few gnome-shell hangs with f16. In all cases,
> ctrl-alt-backspace worked to kill it and it then restarted.


I just had a Gnome lockup as I was reading your message.
ctrl-alt-backspace did not work.

Rather than hijack the OP's thread, which I suspect may be different
from a Gnome problem (unless he follows up otherwise), I'm going to go
try to collect some logs and other things and create a new email
thread in a few moments

-- 
Deron Meranda
http://deron.meranda.us/
-- 
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines


Gnome Shell periodically locks up hard in F16

2011-11-18 Thread Deron Meranda
Since upgrading to Fedora 16, I have experienced several periodic hard
lock-ups of the Gnome Shell session. I never experienced such
behaviour in F15. I am wondering if anybody else is seeing something
similar or may have advice, or can suggest a better way for me to
gather useful debugging information should it happen again.

I'm running with this version (including shell extensions):

gnome-shell-3.2.1-2.fc16.x86_64
gnome-shell-extension-apps-menu-3.2.0-1.fc16.noarch
gnome-shell-extension-common-3.2.0-1.fc16.noarch
gnome-shell-extension-drive-menu-3.2.0-1.fc16.noarch
gnome-shell-extension-mediaplayers-0-0.1.git259f96e.fc16.noarch
gnome-shell-extension-places-menu-3.2.0-1.fc16.noarch
gnome-shell-extension-systemMonitor-3.2.0-1.fc16.noarch

Often these lock-ups occur when I'm opening or closing windows in
quick succession. However the last lock-up happened as I flung the
pointer into the upper-left corner to bring up the Gnome Shell
activities bar. Gnome hung almost instantly, and the screen output was
frozen-in-time just as the little animated circular "ripple" that
happens when you hit an edge got about 15-to-20 pixels away from the
corner position.

The general symptoms are that all user interaction with the display
ceases to work. The mouse pointer will still move, but nothing can be
clicked on. Keyboard entry completely stops working too; which
includes any of the hot keys such as the "windows" keys, alt-F?,
ctl-alt-backspace, etc. I think running applications may still able to
draw to the screen, as I saw firefox refresh some icons while it was
in a locked up state. But Gnome itself appears quite dead.

The operating system as a whole though is still working. I can login
using ssh from another machine, and kill off the hung user's gnome
session processes. Afterwards I log in again to a new session and
everything works fine.


I didn't see anything in my syslog, except at the point when I killed
the session processes, such as...

Nov 18 23:53:03 beryl pulseaudio[2563]: module-gconf.c: Unable to read
or parse data from client.
Nov 18 23:53:03 beryl gnome-session[2509]: WARNING: Detected that
screensaver has left the bus
Nov 18 23:53:03 beryl gnome-session[2509]: GConf-WARNING: Got
Disconnected from DBus.#012
Nov 18 23:53:03 beryl gnome-session[2509]: WARNING: Application
'gnome-settings-daemon.desktop' killed by signal
Nov 18 23:53:03 beryl gnome-session[2509]: WARNING: Application
'gnome-shell.desktop' killed by signal
Nov 18 23:53:33 beryl systemd-logind[1256]: Removed session 2.
Nov 18 23:53:35 beryl systemd-logind[1256]: New session 39 of user gdm.
Nov 18 23:53:35 beryl systemd-logind[1256]: Linked /tmp/.X11-unix/X0
to /run/user/gdm/X11/display.
...

The ~/.xsession-errors file is harder to decipher, mainly because it
lacks any timestamps at all and is generally quite cluttered.  I am
seeing a ton of errors like:

   ([object 
_private_Clutter_Timeline],434)@/usr/share/gnome-shell/js/ui/tweener.js:220
   "'
JS ERROR: !!! message = '"global.current_event_time is not a function"'
JS ERROR: !!!   Exception was: TypeError:
global.current_event_time is not a function
JS ERROR: !!! lineNumber = '292'
JS ERROR: !!! fileName = '"/usr/share/gnome-shell/js/ui/keyboard.js"'

But I see those even when Gnome is not locked up. I think this may be
an unrelated upstream bug,
http://mail.gnome.org/archives/commits-list/2011-November/msg01202.html


And I also caught an exception in seapplet, which is strange because I
did not see any AVC error show up in syslog. The stack trace follows:

*** glibc detected *** /usr/bin/seapplet: double free or corruption
(out): 0x0265d290 ***
=== Backtrace: =
/lib64/libc.so.6[0x368be7c606]
/lib64/libglib-2.0.so.0(g_free+0x23)[0x368ba4b793]
/usr/lib64/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0[0x369df6ad19]
/usr/lib64/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0[0x369dfc62f2]
/lib64/libgobject-2.0.so.0(g_closure_invoke+0x154)[0x368f60ea24]
/lib64/libgobject-2.0.so.0[0x368f620527]
/lib64/libgobject-2.0.so.0(g_signal_emit_valist+0x851)[0x368f62a141]
/lib64/libgobject-2.0.so.0(g_signal_emit+0x82)[0x368f62a2e2]
/lib64/libgobject-2.0.so.0[0x368f611a47]
/lib64/libgobject-2.0.so.0(g_object_notify+0x500)[0x368f613a80]
/usr/lib64/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0[0x369dfc9723]
/usr/lib64/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0(gtk_main_do_event+0x3f5)[0x369df4cb05]
/usr/lib64/libgdk-x11-2.0.so.0[0x369ca6209c]
/lib64/libglib-2.0.so.0(g_main_context_dispatch+0x1dd)[0x368ba44a7d]
/lib64/libglib-2.0.so.0[0x368ba45278]
/lib64/libglib-2.0.so.0(g_main_loop_run+0x175)[0x368ba457c5]
/usr/lib64/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0(gtk_main+0xa7)[0x369df4b9c7]
/usr/bin/seapplet[0x4021c6]
/lib64/libc.so.6(__libc_start_main+0xed)[0x368be2169d]
/usr/bin/seapplet[0x402779]
=== Memory map: 
hundreds of lines omitted here...


Otherwise, I don't have much else to report at this point. Any help to
figure this out would be appreciated. Thanks.
-- 
Deron Meranda
http://deron.meranda.us/
-- 
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To uns

Gnome Shell periodically locks up hard in F16

2011-11-18 Thread Deron Meranda
(Oops, I originally sent this to the wrong list address ... sorry if
anybody sees duplicates)

Since upgrading to Fedora 16, I have experienced several periodic hard
lock-ups of the Gnome Shell session. I never experienced such
behaviour in F15. I am wondering if anybody else is seeing something
similar or may have advice, or can suggest a better way for me to
gather useful debugging information should it happen again.

I'm running with this version (including shell extensions):

gnome-shell-3.2.1-2.fc16.x86_64
gnome-shell-extension-apps-menu-3.2.0-1.fc16.noarch
gnome-shell-extension-common-3.2.0-1.fc16.noarch
gnome-shell-extension-drive-menu-3.2.0-1.fc16.noarch
gnome-shell-extension-mediaplayers-0-0.1.git259f96e.fc16.noarch
gnome-shell-extension-places-menu-3.2.0-1.fc16.noarch
gnome-shell-extension-systemMonitor-3.2.0-1.fc16.noarch

Often these lock-ups occur when I'm opening or closing windows in
quick succession. However the last lock-up happened as I flung the
pointer into the upper-left corner to bring up the Gnome Shell
activities bar. Gnome hung almost instantly, and the screen output was
frozen-in-time just as the little animated circular "ripple" that
happens when you hit an edge got about 15-to-20 pixels away from the
corner position.

The general symptoms are that all user interaction with the display
ceases to work. The mouse pointer will still move, but nothing can be
clicked on. Keyboard entry completely stops working too; which
includes any of the hot keys such as the "windows" keys, alt-F?,
ctl-alt-backspace, etc. I think running applications may still able to
draw to the screen, as I saw firefox refresh some icons while it was
in a locked up state. But Gnome itself appears quite dead.

The operating system as a whole though is still working. I can login
using ssh from another machine, and kill off the hung user's gnome
session processes. Afterwards I log in again to a new session and
everything works fine.


I didn't see anything in my syslog, except at the point when I killed
the session processes, such as...

Nov 18 23:53:03 beryl pulseaudio[2563]: module-gconf.c: Unable to read
or parse data from client.
Nov 18 23:53:03 beryl gnome-session[2509]: WARNING: Detected that
screensaver has left the bus
Nov 18 23:53:03 beryl gnome-session[2509]: GConf-WARNING: Got
Disconnected from DBus.#012
Nov 18 23:53:03 beryl gnome-session[2509]: WARNING: Application
'gnome-settings-daemon.desktop' killed by signal
Nov 18 23:53:03 beryl gnome-session[2509]: WARNING: Application
'gnome-shell.desktop' killed by signal
Nov 18 23:53:33 beryl systemd-logind[1256]: Removed session 2.
Nov 18 23:53:35 beryl systemd-logind[1256]: New session 39 of user gdm.
Nov 18 23:53:35 beryl systemd-logind[1256]: Linked /tmp/.X11-unix/X0
to /run/user/gdm/X11/display.
...

The ~/.xsession-errors file is harder to decipher, mainly because it
lacks any timestamps at all and is generally quite cluttered.  I am
seeing a ton of errors like:

  ([object 
_private_Clutter_Timeline],434)@/usr/share/gnome-shell/js/ui/tweener.js:220
  "'
   JS ERROR: !!! message = '"global.current_event_time is not a function"'
   JS ERROR: !!!   Exception was: TypeError:
global.current_event_time is not a function
   JS ERROR: !!! lineNumber = '292'
   JS ERROR: !!! fileName = '"/usr/share/gnome-shell/js/ui/keyboard.js"'

But I see those even when Gnome is not locked up. I think this may be
an unrelated upstream bug,
http://mail.gnome.org/archives/commits-list/2011-November/msg01202.html


And I also caught an exception in seapplet, which is strange because I
did not see any AVC error show up in syslog. The stack trace follows:

*** glibc detected *** /usr/bin/seapplet: double free or corruption
(out): 0x0265d290 ***
=== Backtrace: =
/lib64/libc.so.6[0x368be7c606]
/lib64/libglib-2.0.so.0(g_free+0x23)[0x368ba4b793]
/usr/lib64/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0[0x369df6ad19]
/usr/lib64/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0[0x369dfc62f2]
/lib64/libgobject-2.0.so.0(g_closure_invoke+0x154)[0x368f60ea24]
/lib64/libgobject-2.0.so.0[0x368f620527]
/lib64/libgobject-2.0.so.0(g_signal_emit_valist+0x851)[0x368f62a141]
/lib64/libgobject-2.0.so.0(g_signal_emit+0x82)[0x368f62a2e2]
/lib64/libgobject-2.0.so.0[0x368f611a47]
/lib64/libgobject-2.0.so.0(g_object_notify+0x500)[0x368f613a80]
/usr/lib64/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0[0x369dfc9723]
/usr/lib64/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0(gtk_main_do_event+0x3f5)[0x369df4cb05]
/usr/lib64/libgdk-x11-2.0.so.0[0x369ca6209c]
/lib64/libglib-2.0.so.0(g_main_context_dispatch+0x1dd)[0x368ba44a7d]
/lib64/libglib-2.0.so.0[0x368ba45278]
/lib64/libglib-2.0.so.0(g_main_loop_run+0x175)[0x368ba457c5]
/usr/lib64/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0(gtk_main+0xa7)[0x369df4b9c7]
/usr/bin/seapplet[0x4021c6]
/lib64/libc.so.6(__libc_start_main+0xed)[0x368be2169d]
/usr/bin/seapplet[0x402779]
=== Memory map: 
hundreds of lines omitted here...


Otherwise, I don't have much else to report at this point. Any help to
figure this out would be appreciated. Thanks.

-- 
Deron Me

[no subject]

2011-11-18 Thread terry l

-- 
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines


Re: [SOLVED] Re: firefox taking foreground

2011-11-18 Thread nian liu
2011/11/17 g 

> On 11/16/2011 07:56 PM, Joe Zeff wrote:
> > On 11/16/2011 11:52 AM, g wrote:
> >> my apoligies.
> >>
> >> i used 'nicknames' for my emails.
> >>
> >> i use 'fe' for "fedora" and 'ff' for "firefox".
> >>
> >> other post to fedora tsl was in error. seems i used 'fe'
> >> instead of 'ff'.
> >
> > Tish and typos happen; don't worry about it.  Still, you might want to
> > consider changing your nicknames to something a tad less easy to mix,
> > such as fed and fire.
>
> after posting this, i did.
>
> 'ff' is now 'mf'. 8-)
>
>
> --
>
> peace out.
>
> tc.hago,
>
> g
> .
>
> *please reply "plain text" only. "html text" are deleted*
>
> 
> in a free world without fences, who needs gates.
> **
> help microsoft stamp out piracy - give linux to a friend today.
> **
> to mess up a linux box, you need to work at it.
> to mess up an ms windows box, you just need to *look* at it.
> **
> The installation instructions stated to install Windows 2000 or better.
> So I installed Linux.
> **
> learn linux:
> 'Rute User's Tutorial and Exposition' http://rute.2038bug.com/index.html
> 'The Linux Documentation Project' http://www.tldp.org/
> 'LDP HOWTO-index' http://www.tldp.org/HOWTO/HOWTO-INDEX/index.html
> 'HowtoForge' http://howtoforge.com/
> 
>
>
> --
> users mailing list
> users@lists.fedoraproject.org
> To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
> https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
> Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
>
> how about the ati drivers? and mine: hd6370m
-- 
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines


Re: mozilla-https-everywhere causes Firefox to freeze up regularly

2011-11-18 Thread g
On 11/18/2011 10:49 PM, Andre Robatino wrote:
<>


> I noticed that even after doing this, under Tools/Add-ons/Extensions, HTTPS
> Everywhere was listed. I clicked "Disable", and don't remember if I restarted
> Firefox, but when I checked again, the extension was not listed anymore. The
> browser seems stable again.

any time you uninstall, disable, or enable an add-on, mozilla firefox or
thunderbird should be restarted.

you should see a yellow bar at top advising you to do so.

when you do so, you remove/add add-on from/to program/memory area.


-- 

peace out.

tc.hago,

g
.

*please reply "plain text" only. "html text" are deleted*


in a free world without fences, who needs gates.
**
help microsoft stamp out piracy - give linux to a friend today.
**
to mess up a linux box, you need to work at it.
to mess up an ms windows box, you just need to *look* at it.
**
The installation instructions stated to install Windows 2000 or better.
So I installed Linux.
**
learn linux:
'Rute User's Tutorial and Exposition' http://rute.2038bug.com/index.html
'The Linux Documentation Project' http://www.tldp.org/
'LDP HOWTO-index' http://www.tldp.org/HOWTO/HOWTO-INDEX/index.html
'HowtoForge' http://howtoforge.com/




signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
-- 
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines