Re: The haskell platform in ubuntu?

2009-07-18 Thread Vincenzo Ciancia
Il giorno sab, 18/07/2009 alle 00.32 +0200, Jan Claeys ha scritto:
> 
> Debian unstable & experimental are updated all the time, so as long as
> the Debian maintainer keeps the package up-to-date, there will be a
> new
> version every 6 months in Ubuntu too?
> 

Hmm yes this is likely obvious but: is it true that packages in sid are
updated frequently? I mean: it is a waste of manpower to keep a package
up-to-date, e.g. if stable has version 1, and unstable passes trough
version 2,3,4,5, then the stable is released again, what is the
motivation in putting versions 2,3,4 in debian (apart from ubuntu :). I
am not _questioning_ this, I am wondering if maintainers in debian are
actually worried to constantly update packages in unstable.

Vincenzo



-- 
Ubuntu-devel-discuss mailing list
Ubuntu-devel-discuss@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-devel-discuss


Compile farm for MIPS64/Loongson

2009-07-18 Thread Kai-Cheung Leung
Debian is still supporting MIPS64, which the Chinese Loongson chips
are compartible with.  And Ubuntu codes are lifted from Debian.

I would like to have an unofficial repository for MIPS64/Loongson, at
least in main, and if this works, I really would like to set up a
project that provides unofficial MIPS64 support.  This would certainly
drive Ubuntu to the Chinese desktop market, where in a few years time,
Loongson can become popular and now is a good time to prepare for.

How can I set up a compile farm that sync packages from Ubuntu source,
do automated compiling and for each package, automatically generate a
report?

Where can I find information about such infrastructure in Ubuntu?

Thanks!

kcleung

-- 
Ubuntu-devel-discuss mailing list
Ubuntu-devel-discuss@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-devel-discuss


Re: The haskell platform in ubuntu?

2009-07-18 Thread Iain Lane
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

Hello,

On Sat, 18 Jul 2009 09:59:45 +0200
Vincenzo Ciancia  wrote:

> Il giorno sab, 18/07/2009 alle 00.32 +0200, Jan Claeys ha scritto:
> > 
> > Debian unstable & experimental are updated all the time, so as long
> > as the Debian maintainer keeps the package up-to-date, there will
> > be a new
> > version every 6 months in Ubuntu too?
> > 
> 
> Hmm yes this is likely obvious but: is it true that packages in sid
> are updated frequently? I mean: it is a waste of manpower to keep a
> package up-to-date, e.g. if stable has version 1, and unstable passes
> trough version 2,3,4,5, then the stable is released again, what is the
> motivation in putting versions 2,3,4 in debian (apart from ubuntu :).
> I am not _questioning_ this, I am wondering if maintainers in debian
> are actually worried to constantly update packages in unstable.
> 
> Vincenzo

Yes, in the main packages are updated throughout a release cycle and
not just close to a release. Watch debian-chan...@l.d.o if you want to
see.

Regards,
Iain
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux)

iEYEARECAAYFAkphyKAACgkQPy0SnCC/zcerGACdGt4MUvd9iGy16Uy1dOxzOxyX
K4IAnRhSj6DOPcSdzNMMJPkEY94D4FWd
=ZeIz
-END PGP SIGNATURE-
-- 
Ubuntu-devel-discuss mailing list
Ubuntu-devel-discuss@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-devel-discuss


xdmcp disabled so why Broadcast=true in gdm.conf in default installs?

2009-07-18 Thread bluebird999999999
With Ubuntu desktop installs, xdmcp is disabled by default.

Why then is Broadcast listed as true (enabled)?

In: /etc/gdm/gdm.conf
At: Broadcast=true

Should the Ubuntu developers mark this as false in new releases and should the 
Ubuntu desktop users modify this to false in current installs? Whether or not 
this Broadcast entry marked as true presents a security problem for a fresh 
install is another question.

chooser=true is also found on default installs, bad idea?

I spotted error messages with xdmcp in daemon log files, I don't use xdmcp, 
these error messages with xdmcp disabled should not be visible. I purged all 
vnc, rdesktop and similar remote client packages, no ports are open, the xdmcp 
error messages are highly suspect despite my best efforts.

-- 
Ubuntu-devel-discuss mailing list
Ubuntu-devel-discuss@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-devel-discuss