[Bug 576724] Re: Ubuntu Lucid grub2 dist-upgrades result in confusion
Part of the problem is windows refers to drives when they really are partitions. In windows you have a C: drive and a D: drive when you only have one hard drive and two partitions. All those windows users that then have not installed Ubuntu other than the auto installer really do not know about partitions. So when the grub installer says to install to all drives the average windows user thinks that has to include everything. Then list list presented does not clearly list drives separate from partitions. If you have a lot of partitions it becomes a very long list. The average user see this and will check off everything because they were told to install to all drives; [ ] /dev/sda 640135MB,WDC_WD6400AAKS-00A7B0) [ ] - /dev/sda1 (13209 MB) [ ] - /dev/sda10 (41948 MB) [ ] - /dev/sda11 (10988 MB) [ ] - /dev/sda12 (48002 MB) [ ] - /dev/sda3 (429877 MB) [ ] - /dev/sda4 (0 MB) [ ] - /dev/sda5 (13152 MB) [ ] - /dev/sda6 (11531 MB) [ ] - /dev/sda7 (10001 MB) [ ] - /dev/sda8 (50420 MB) [ ] - /dev/sda9 (10997 MB) [ ] /dev/sdb (160041 MB, ST3160811AS) [ ] - /dev/sdb1 (75039MB) [ ] - /dev/sdb2 (55002MB) [ ] - /dev/sdb3 (10997 MB) [ ] - /dev/sdb4 (19000 MB) -- Ubuntu Lucid grub2 dist-upgrades result in confusion https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/576724 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1775743] Re: [regression] Cosmic daily images 20180606-11 install but boots only to grub prompt on EFI systems
Not sure proposed fix is all of issue. I boot 18.04 by default with UEFI and every test or experimental install in the past has overwritten my /EFI/ubuntu. But install of Cosmic did not overwrite my /EFI/ubuntu but created /EFI/grub. It has a correct /EFI/grub/grub.cfg, but my UEFI is set to default boot using /EFI/ubuntu. But booting grub UEFI entry booted me into my default install. Issue is similar to previous bug reports where a change to GRUB_DISTRIBUTOR= creates a new UEFI entry, but internally either efi_distributor or perhaps just the code that defines where to find grub is hard coded to /EFI/ubuntu/grub.cfg. It needs to use grub.cfg in the ESP folder it creates. And kluge on Kubuntu should finally be fixed. Older version, not sure what you have now. ./.pc/install_arm64_naming.patch/util/grub-install.c: efi_distributor = "ubuntu"; ./debian/patches/install_efi_ubuntu_flavours.patch:+efi_distributor = "ubuntu"; ./ChangeLog:GRUB_DISTRIBUTOR on efibootmgr line. ./debian/default/grub:GRUB_DISTRIBUTOR=`lsb_release -i -s 2> /dev/null || echo Debian` ./debian/postinst.in:bootloader_id="$(config_item GRUB_DISTRIBUTOR | tr A-Z a-z | \ ./debian/changelog:- Adjust UEFI installation to cope with Kubuntu setting GRUB_DISTRIBUTOR -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1775743 Title: [regression] Cosmic daily images 20180606-11 install but boots only to grub prompt on EFI systems To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/grub-installer/+bug/1775743/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1775743] Re: [regression] Cosmic daily images 20180606-11 install but boot only to grub prompt on EFI systems
> With which daily image did you see this? The install of Cosmic has modified date of Mon 11 Jun 2018 07∶55∶53 AM CDT. Not sure when I downloaded it. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1775743 Title: [regression] Cosmic daily images 20180606-11 install but boot only to grub prompt on EFI systems To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/grub-installer/+bug/1775743/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1769781] Re: Lubuntu Cosmic missing squashfs-tools, causing Calamares to crash
With 18.10 using grub to loop mount the ISO. /tmp/calamares-root-ere7liao/boot/efi Boost.Python error in job "unpackfs". Command '['mount', '/cdrom/casper/filesystem.squashfs', '/tmp/tmp0dld31ld/filesystem', '-t', 'squashfs', '-o', 'loop']' returned non-zero exit status 32. None Traceback: File "/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/calamares/modules/unpackfs/main.py", line 318, in run return unpackop.run() File "/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/calamares/modules/unpackfs/main.py", line 189, in run self.mount_image(entry, imgmountdir) File "/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/calamares/modules/unpackfs/main.py", line 239, in mount_image "-o", "loop" File "/usr/lib/python3.6/subprocess.py", line 291, in check_call raise CalledProcessError(retcode, cmd) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1769781 Title: Lubuntu Cosmic missing squashfs-tools, causing Calamares to crash To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/calamares-settings-ubuntu/+bug/1769781/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1396379] Re: installer uses first EFI system partition found even when directed otherwise
Installed 19.04 to sdb drive (internal, but also flash drive as sdc) and it overwrote my /EFI/ubuntu folder on sda. I changed combo box which never has done anything with UEFI installs, but it does then say during install that it is installing grub to sdb/external. I clicked on ESP on sda, and said do not use. I clicked on ESP on sdb and said use as ESP. Several years ago I installed Fedora, just to see grub differences, and it just installed to sdb when I told it to. So it is Ubuntu's modifications to grub that make it not install to drive you really want. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1396379 Title: installer uses first EFI system partition found even when directed otherwise To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubiquity/+bug/1396379/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1753518] Re: package grub-efi-amd64-signed 1.93+2.02-2ubuntu8 failed to install/upgrade: installed grub-efi-amd64-signed package post-installation script subprocess returned error exit status 1
I updated UEFI from Asus, but same version I was using since April. Still only can boot with rEFInd from sdc or flash drive with full install of Ubuntu. UEFI does not want to see ESP on sda which is mounted by fstab. It changes entries to like drive disconnected. And on reboot all new entries only from ESP on sdc are created. But ran dosfsk on ESP at sda1, and it showed error with dirty bit set, as soon as I rebooted so shutdown was not correct. Also tried manually unmounting my ESP at sda1 and immediately shutting down, but same issue. UEFI would not see ESP on sda1 and dirty bit set again. And all new entries in UEFI from sdc's ESP files. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1753518 Title: package grub-efi-amd64-signed 1.93+2.02-2ubuntu8 failed to install/upgrade: installed grub-efi-amd64-signed package post- installation script subprocess returned error exit status 1 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/grub2-signed/+bug/1753518/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1787692] Re: package grub-efi-amd64-signed 1.93.4+2.02-2ubuntu8.3 failed to install/upgrade: installed grub-efi-amd64-signed package post-installation script subprocess returned error exit status
Resolved my boot issue, I think. Errors on FAT32 ESP, my sda1. Issue started with no space left on device. Then I would add new UEFI boot entry for sda's ESP for 18.04, but on reboot UEFI would not use it, erased it and entries for all the .efi possibilities were added from boot device, my sdc. Not sure if all fixes required, perhaps it originally was originally error corrupted fat32 ESP. But that error would keep appearing on reboot. Reinstalled Asus UEFI, same version as one used since April 2018. Unplugged all drives to get UEFI to reset, removed all entries from UEFI with efibootmgr. Added UEFI boot entry for 18.04 using efibootmgr to to boot from sda1. Every reboot, erased entry to boot sda, and only booted with rEFInd on sdc or external drive. Ran fsck.vfat and it cleared error bit saying it may have not been umounted correctly. It is mounted with fstab in sda's install. On reboot same issue, all UEFI entries for sda missing, and fsck.vfat showed error bit. I believe that is why UEFI would not use my sda1, ESP for booting. Using another install so sda1, ESP not mounted. Then totally reformatted sda1 using command line, mkfs, not gparted. Updated ESP/efi entry in fstab in Ubuntu 18.04 install with new UUID. Totally uninstalled & reinstalled grub signed version. System now boots from ESP on sda again. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1787692 Title: package grub-efi-amd64-signed 1.93.4+2.02-2ubuntu8.3 failed to install/upgrade: installed grub-efi-amd64-signed package post- installation script subprocess returned error exit status 1 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/grub2-signed/+bug/1787692/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1396379] Re: installer uses first EFI system partition found even when directed otherwise
Still an issue in 19.04 Disco. Just installed again to sdb and just like comment above, said it was installing to sdb's ESP, but overwrote my main working install's ESP on sda. I cannot find any reference to installing to sda. Installer sees sda as an ESP, but also sees sdb as ESP. ** Changed in: ubiquity (Ubuntu) Status: Triaged => Confirmed -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1396379 Title: installer uses first EFI system partition found even when directed otherwise To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubiquity/+bug/1396379/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1771651] Re: The installation fails with a "GRUB installation failed" message.
Issue is really that to boot in UEFI mode you should have gpt. And most systems now have gpt as windows in UEFI mode requires gpt. But if installing in BIOS/Legacy/CSM boot mode to gpt drive, you must have a bios_grub partition which is only 1 or 2MB unformatted with bios_grub flag. Or if installing in UEFI boot mode to gpt drive, you must have an ESP - efi system partition which is fat32 with boot flag. If you do not have correct partitions for boot mode, then grub install fails. Boot-Repair will tell you that you need the correct partition, and grub should at least explain why it is not installing, like Boot-Repair does. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1771651 Title: The installation fails with a "GRUB installation failed" message. To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/grub-installer/+bug/1771651/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1229488] Re: EFI install to removable media not supported
Same issue as posted in #3 with new 18.04. Install to flash drive, does not use ESP on flash drive, but installs to ESP on sda. Then system is not bootable without flash drive as it has overwritten my default boot on sda from /EFI/ubuntu. I also have changed GRUB_DISTRIBUTOR as defined in /etc/default/grub to have unique UEFI and grub menu entries for my internal drive system. Even though grub-install creates new /EFI/bionic_18_04 folder and entry in UEFI. And EFI folder had correct grub.cfg, the system only booted from grub.cfg in /EFI/ubuntu, Or something in grubx64.efi is hard coded to only boot from /EFI/ubuntu/grub.cfg. Better to fix grub not use use hard coded efi_distributor as ubuntu and fix kluge of kubuntu name change. ./debian/patches/install_efi_ubuntu_flavours.patch:Subject: Cope with Kubuntu setting GRUB_DISTRIBUTOR ./debian/patches/install_efi_ubuntu_flavours.patch:we probably need to split GRUB_DISTRIBUTOR into a couple of different -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1229488 Title: EFI install to removable media not supported To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubiquity/+bug/1229488/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1396379] Re: installer uses first EFI system partition found even when directed otherwise
Finally found work around. Once installer started, I checked mount and mount target mounted ESP on sda. Unmounted that partition & mounted ESP on sdc. ubuntu-mate@ubuntu-mate:~$ history 1 mount 2 sudo umount /target/boot/efi 3 sudo mount /dev/sdc1 /target/boot/efi 4 mount -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1396379 Title: installer uses first EFI system partition found even when directed otherwise To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubiquity/+bug/1396379/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1396379] Re: installer uses first EFI system partition found even when directed otherwise
Just installed 18.04.1 to flash drive sdd. Installer said this: Dec 27 19:29:45 ubuntu grub-installer: info: Installing grub on '/dev/sdd' Dec 27 19:29:45 ubuntu grub-installer: info: grub-install does not support --no-floppy Dec 27 19:29:45 ubuntu grub-installer: info: Running chroot /target grub-install --force "/dev/sdd" Dec 27 19:29:45 ubuntu grub-installer: Installing for x86_64-efi platform. Dec 27 19:30:23 ubuntu grub-installer: Installation finished. No error reported. Dec 27 19:30:23 ubuntu grub-installer: info: grub-install ran successfully But again it actually installed to sda's ESP overwriting my main working install's boot on sda drive. ESP on sdd was empty. >From my main working install, once reconfigured grub.cfg to boot main install. fred@bionic-z97:~$ ll /boot/efi/EFI/ubuntu total 3728 drwxr-xr-x 3 root root4096 Dec 27 15:52 ./ drwxr-xr-x 4 root root4096 Sep 16 15:44 ../ -rwxr-xr-x 1 root root 108 Dec 27 13:30 BOOTX64.CSV* drwxr-xr-x 2 root root4096 Dec 27 13:14 fw/ -rwxr-xr-x 1 root root 71400 Dec 27 13:14 fwupx64.efi* -rwxr-xr-x 1 root root 194 Dec 27 15:52 grub.cfg* -rwxr-xr-x 1 root root 1116024 Dec 27 13:30 grubx64.efi* -rwxr-xr-x 1 root root 1269496 Dec 27 13:30 mmx64.efi* -rwxr-xr-x 1 root root 1334816 Dec 27 13:30 shimx64.efi* -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1396379 Title: installer uses first EFI system partition found even when directed otherwise To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubiquity/+bug/1396379/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1816184] [NEW] Disco ubiquity crash
Public bug reported: Installing latest version as of Feb 15, 2019. I have multiple installs, so using Something Else install option. I am able to change partition to use to my sdb8 which is previous Disco install. I tell it not to use swaps that I still have on sda & sdc. But I want to install grub to sdb's ESP. It recognizes sdb's ESP as the efi partition, but when I try to tell it not to use sda1, my ESP/efi partition it totally locks up with a white box centered on screen with smaller circle with an X in middle and ? on two lines next to circle with X in white box. System totally locked up, so logs not available. Testing to see if any of these related bugs are fixed in grub. Ubuntu Installer uses wrong bootloader location for USB/sdb UEFI installs https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubiquity/+bug/1173457 https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubiquity/+bug/1396379 https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/grub2/+bug/1229488 https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubiquity/+bug/1229488 ** Affects: ubiquity (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1816184 Title: Disco ubiquity crash To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubiquity/+bug/1816184/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1816184] Re: Disco ubiquity crash
Rebooted and reinstalled. Using different order for selecting ESP/efi partition it worked without error on not using sda, but installed to ESP on sda. Install log showed this: Feb 15 20:23:36 ubuntu grub-installer: info: Installing grub on '/dev/sdb' Feb 15 20:23:36 ubuntu grub-installer: info: grub-install does not support --no-floppy Feb 15 20:23:36 ubuntu grub-installer: info: Running chroot /target grub-install --force "/dev/sdb" Feb 15 20:23:36 ubuntu grub-installer: Installing for x86_64-efi platform. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1816184 Title: Disco ubiquity crash To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubiquity/+bug/1816184/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1817123] Re: tmpfiles.d files pointing to legacy directory /var/run
Apr 28 18:34:20 fred-Z170N-disco systemd-tmpfiles[615]: [/usr/lib/tmpfiles.d/speech-dispatcher.conf:1] Line references path below legacy directory /var/run/, updating /var/run/speech-dispatcher → /run/speech-dispatcher; please update the tmpfiles.d/ drop-in file accordingly. Apr 28 18:34:20 fred-Z170N-disco systemd-tmpfiles[615]: [/usr/lib/tmpfiles.d/speech-dispatcher.conf:2] Line references path below legacy directory /var/run/, updating /var/run/speech-dispatcher/.cache → /run/speech-dispatcher/.cache; please update the tmpfiles.d/ drop-in file accordingly. Apr 28 18:34:20 fred-Z170N-disco systemd-tmpfiles[615]: [/usr/lib/tmpfiles.d/speech-dispatcher.conf:3] Line references path below legacy directory /var/run/, updating /var/run/speech-dispatcher/.speech-dispatcher → /run/speech-dispatcher/.speech-dispatcher; please update the tmpfiles.d/ drop-in file accordingly. Apr 28 18:34:20 fred-Z170N-disco systemd-tmpfiles[615]: [/usr/lib/tmpfiles.d/speech-dispatcher.conf:4] Line references path below legacy directory /var/run/, updating /var/run/speech-dispatcher/.cache/speech-dispatcher → /run/speech-dispatcher/.cache/speech-dispatcher; please update the tmpfiles.d/ drop-in file accordingly. Apr 28 18:34:20 fred-Z170N-disco systemd-tmpfiles[615]: [/usr/lib/tmpfiles.d/speech-dispatcher.conf:5] Line references path below legacy directory /var/run/, updating /var/run/speech-dispatcher/log → /run/speech-dispatcher/log; please update the tmpfiles.d/ drop-in file accordingly. Apr 28 18:34:20 fred-Z170N-disco systemd-tmpfiles[615]: [/usr/lib/tmpfiles.d/spice-vdagentd.conf:2] Line references path below legacy directory /var/run/, updating /var/run/spice-vdagentd → /run/spice-vdagentd; please update the tmpfiles.d/ drop-in file accordingly. Related: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=902413 https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=912749 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1658487 ** Bug watch added: Debian Bug tracker #902413 https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=902413 ** Bug watch added: Red Hat Bugzilla #1658487 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1658487 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1817123 Title: tmpfiles.d files pointing to legacy directory /var/run To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/systemd/+bug/1817123/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1787692] Re: package grub-efi-amd64-signed 1.93.4+2.02-2ubuntu8.3 failed to install/upgrade: installed grub-efi-amd64-signed package post-installation script subprocess returned error exit status
May be related to this bug. https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/grub2-signed/+bug/1753518 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1787692 Title: package grub-efi-amd64-signed 1.93.4+2.02-2ubuntu8.3 failed to install/upgrade: installed grub-efi-amd64-signed package post- installation script subprocess returned error exit status 1 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/grub2-signed/+bug/1787692/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1753518] Re: package grub-efi-amd64-signed 1.93+2.02-2ubuntu8 failed to install/upgrade: installed grub-efi-amd64-signed package post-installation script subprocess returned error exit status 1
May be related to this bug. https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/grub2-signed/+bug/1787692 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1753518 Title: package grub-efi-amd64-signed 1.93+2.02-2ubuntu8 failed to install/upgrade: installed grub-efi-amd64-signed package post- installation script subprocess returned error exit status 1 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/grub2-signed/+bug/1753518/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1776271] Re: Could not prepare Boot variable: No space left on device (package shim-signed 1.34.9+13-0ubuntu2 [origin: Ubuntu] failed to install/upgrade: Unterprozess installed shim-signed packag
May be similar to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/shim-signed/+bug/1776271 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1776271 Title: Could not prepare Boot variable: No space left on device (package shim-signed 1.34.9+13-0ubuntu2 [origin: Ubuntu] failed to install/upgrade: Unterprozess installed shim-signed package post- installation script gab den Fehler-Ausgangsstatus 1 zurück) To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/shim-signed/+bug/1776271/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1787692] Re: package grub-efi-amd64-signed 1.93.4+2.02-2ubuntu8.3 failed to install/upgrade: installed grub-efi-amd64-signed package post-installation script subprocess returned error exit status
I have been booting with the same version of UEFI from Asus since April. But now either UEFI or Ubuntu is deleting all UEFI entries and creating multiple new UEFI entries from boot device. I was having issue of UEFI entry not installing at all. fred@bionic-z97:~$ sudo grub-install --bootloader-id ubuntu /dev/sda --recheck Installing for x86_64-efi platform. Could not prepare Boot variable: No space left on device grub-install: error: efibootmgr failed to register the boot entry: Input/output error. I have to boot full install on flash drive and use configfile to boot into working install in sda. But something is adding entries from flash drive's ESP. And on reboot added a second BIOS/grub entry (which is not used) I can see UEFI entries come from flash drive as it has extra bionic & copy folders. I was then able to add an entry for working install on sda, but reboot erased it. After boot with efi_not_storage_paranoia And reset of UEFI to defaults & changing back to my preferred settings fred@bionic-z97:/media/fred/ESP_USB/EFI$ ll total 24 drwxr-xr-x 6 fred fred 4096 Apr 4 15:34 ./ drwxr-xr-x 4 fred fred 4096 Dec 31 1969 ../ drwxr-xr-x 3 fred fred 4096 Mar 10 17:47 bionic/ drwxr-xr-x 2 fred fred 4096 Apr 21 09:36 Boot/ drwxr-xr-x 3 fred fred 4096 Apr 21 09:37 ubuntu/ drwxr-xr-x 3 fred fred 4096 Apr 2 12:43 'ubuntu (copy)'/ fred@bionic-z97:/media/fred/ESP_USB/EFI$ sudo efibootmgr -v -c -L ubuntu -l \\EFI\\ubuntu\\shimx64.efi efibootmgr: Warning : Boot has same label ubuntu efibootmgr: Warning : Boot0001 has same label ubuntu efibootmgr: Warning : Boot0002 has same label ubuntu efibootmgr: Warning : Boot0003 has same label ubuntu BootCurrent: 0004 Timeout: 1 seconds BootOrder: 0005,0002,0001,,0004,0003 Boot* ubuntu HD(1,GPT,2a6f47aa-0ae8-42e3-86d8-6463449b2862,0x800,0xfa000)/File(\EFI\ubuntu\shimx64.efi) Boot0001* ubuntu HD(1,GPT,2a6f47aa-0ae8-42e3-86d8-6463449b2862,0x800,0xfa000)/File(\EFI\bionic\shimx64.efi) Boot0002* ubuntu HD(1,GPT,2a6f47aa-0ae8-42e3-86d8-6463449b2862,0x800,0xfa000)/File(\EFI\ubuntu (copy)\shimx64.efi) Boot0003* ubuntuVenHw(99e275e7-75a0-4b37-a2e6-c5385e6c00cb) Boot0004* UEFI: (FAT) PciRoot(0x0)/Pci(0x1d,0x0)/USB(1,0)/USB(5,0)/HD(1,GPT,2a6f47aa-0ae8-42e3-86d8-6463449b2862,0x800,0xfa000)..BO Boot0005* ubuntu HD(1,GPT,3195d314-ce88-42ac-beac-d9f80289ac11,0x800,0xf9dcd)/File(\EFI\ubuntu\shimx64.efi) fred@bionic-z97:~$ sudo efibootmgr -v [sudo] password for fred: BootCurrent: 0002 Timeout: 1 seconds BootOrder: 0002,0001,,0004,0005,0003 Boot* ubuntu HD(1,GPT,2a6f47aa-0ae8-42e3-86d8-6463449b2862,0x800,0xfa000)/File(\EFI\ubuntu\shimx64.efi) Boot0001* ubuntu HD(1,GPT,2a6f47aa-0ae8-42e3-86d8-6463449b2862,0x800,0xfa000)/File(\EFI\bionic\shimx64.efi) Boot0002* ubuntu HD(1,GPT,2a6f47aa-0ae8-42e3-86d8-6463449b2862,0x800,0xfa000)/File(\EFI\ubuntu (copy)\shimx64.efi) Boot0003* ubuntuVenHw(99e275e7-75a0-4b37-a2e6-c5385e6c00cb) Boot0004* UEFI: (FAT) PciRoot(0x0)/Pci(0x14,0x0)/USB(9,0)/HD(1,GPT,2a6f47aa-0ae8-42e3-86d8-6463449b2862,0x800,0xfa000)..BO Boot0005* ubuntuVenHw(99e275e7-75a0-4b37-a2e6-c5385e6c00cb) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1787692 Title: package grub-efi-amd64-signed 1.93.4+2.02-2ubuntu8.3 failed to install/upgrade: installed grub-efi-amd64-signed package post- installation script subprocess returned error exit status 1 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/grub2-signed/+bug/1787692/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1780015] Re: Installer gparted creates 2 BIOS boot partition
Installer only asks for bios_grub if you boot install media in BIOS mode. With UEFI systems you want to always boot installer in UEFI boot mode and then it will use ESP - efi system partition. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1780015 Title: Installer gparted creates 2 BIOS boot partition To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubiquity/+bug/1780015/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1173457] Re: Ubuntu Installer uses wrong bootloader location for USB UEFI installs
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 1396379 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1396379 Just installed 18.10 to external SSD seen as sdc, but hd0 in UEFI/grub. I unselected the ESP on sda, and selected external's ESP for efi partition. Also used combo box which I know currently does nothing with UEFI installs. And it still overwrote my main working install's /EFI/ubuntu folder & /EFI/Boot folder with new files. I thought 18.10 has some grub fixes? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1173457 Title: Ubuntu Installer uses wrong bootloader location for USB UEFI installs To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubiquity/+bug/1173457/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1775743] Re: [regression] Cosmic daily images 20180606-11 install but boot only to grub prompt on EFI systems
Just saw one thread in Ubuntu Forums & one in AskUbuntu where with 18.04 the Boot-Repair output from efibootmgr -v shows no ubuntu entry and only has a grub entry. See: https://ubuntuforums.org/showthread.php?t=2396042 And: https://askubuntu.com/questions/1053895/system-always-boots-to-grub-prompt?noredirect=1#comment1722812_1053895 This user already reported that copying /EFI/grub/grub.cfg to /EFI/ubuntu/grub.cfg fixed his boot issue. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1775743 Title: [regression] Cosmic daily images 20180606-11 install but boot only to grub prompt on EFI systems To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/grub-installer/+bug/1775743/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1781042] Re: 18.04 installation with internet access results in GRUB minimal BASH-like interface with no boot entries
Seems related to this bug. Ubuntu 18.10 Cosmic installed /EFI/grub https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/grub2/+bug/1775743 As update during install creates /EFI/grub like in above install. But some users manually boot into Ubuntu & update grub and it works. manual boot: grub> set root=(hd0,gpt8) #where gpt8 in example is ext4 partition with ubuntu. grub> configfile /boot/grub/grub.cfg https://ubuntuforums.org/showthread.php?t=2396045 $ sudo apt-get install grub-efi-amd64 $ sudo update-grub or it seems Ubiquity installs a different version of grub during install than an update once booted installs? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1781042 Title: 18.04 installation with internet access results in GRUB minimal BASH- like interface with no boot entries To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubiquity/+bug/1781042/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1229488] Re: 13.10 USB to USB Install on UEFI Secure Boot Machine Left Host Unbootable
I have same issue with 17.04 full install to flash drive. It overwrites my main working install's /EFI/ubuntu on sda. If I then remove flash drive system is unbootable. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1229488 Title: 13.10 USB to USB Install on UEFI Secure Boot Machine Left Host Unbootable To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/grub2/+bug/1229488/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1155216] Re: Unable to umount isodevice
Same error with trusty -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1155216 Title: Unable to umount isodevice To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubiquity/+bug/1155216/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1265192] Re: Reinstallation wipes out all partitions
In Ubuntu Forums we have seen at least 4 or 5 users with exactly the same issue. Installer only offers to reinstall Ubuntu but then overwrites entire hard drive. First thought it was user issue, but many have reported it and described consisently what they have done. On re-install it only sees Ubuntu not Windows, but does not reinstall to an existing Linux partition, but does the install to entire drive. Best to only use Something Else on re-install. But auto install should not offer incorrect choice. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1265192 Title: Reinstallation wipes out all partitions To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubiquity/+bug/1265192/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1249663] Re: Trusty gnome flashback indicator-applet-complete disappeared completely. Nothing displays in the top right panel.
It disappeared on me, but then I was able to re-add it. But not on right side. It is sitting in the middle now. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1249663 Title: Trusty gnome flashback indicator-applet-complete disappeared completely. Nothing displays in the top right panel. To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/indicator-applet/+bug/1249663/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1561712] Re: EFI doesn't show multiple installs of the same operating system
Similar to https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/grub2/+bug/1450783 If distributor was updated by version then you would have different /EFI/version folders and/or different entries in UEFI. Other versions of Linux do have different names/versions, so grub2 can do this. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1561712 Title: EFI doesn't show multiple installs of the same operating system To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/grub2/+bug/1561712/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1414124] Re: install reports unable to install grub to /dev/sdb
I have tried installing all versions thru 17.04 to sdb and to sdb's ESP. Every one overwrote my main working installs /EFI/ubuntu folder in sda. I quickly learned to back that folder up, so I could reset main working install as default boot. Same happens when I do a full install to flash drive, it overwrites my main working installs /EFI/ubuntu on sda. But if flash drive grub/shim also needs to be /EFI/Boot/bootx64.efi. And this bug report covers that, although related. https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubiquity/+bug/1173457 and since Debian grub related https://bugs.debian.org/cgi- bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=746662 ** Bug watch added: Debian Bug tracker #746662 http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=746662 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1414124 Title: install reports unable to install grub to /dev/sdb To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/grub2/+bug/1414124/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1173457] Re: Ubuntu Installer uses wrong bootloader location for USB UEFI installs
Debian says it is fixed in Debian Grub 2.02~beta2-19 Back in Jan 2015. https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=767037 https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=746662 https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=708430 ** Bug watch added: Debian Bug tracker #767037 http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=767037 ** Bug watch added: Debian Bug tracker #746662 http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=746662 ** Bug watch added: Debian Bug tracker #708430 http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=708430 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1173457 Title: Ubuntu Installer uses wrong bootloader location for USB UEFI installs To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubiquity/+bug/1173457/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1481516] Re: ubuntu installer modifies EFI configuration on wrong harddrive
Grub only installs to sda. I have created ESP on sdb, told installer to install to sdb, it says during install in notes at bottom installing grub to sdb, but it overwrites my default boot /EFI/ubuntu on sda's ESP. Also issue with full install to flash drive or any external drive as sdb or higher letter. It installs grub to internal drive. If external it also needs to create /EFI/Boot/bootx64.efi. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1481516 Title: ubuntu installer modifies EFI configuration on wrong harddrive To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubiquity/+bug/1481516/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1591352] Re: Ubiquity copies efi boot information to wrong ESP
Ubiquity even says installing grub to sdb during install but overwrites my /EFI/ubuntu on sda. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1591352 Title: Ubiquity copies efi boot information to wrong ESP To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubiquity/+bug/1591352/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1591352] Re: Ubiquity copies efi boot information to wrong ESP
See also: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=746662 ** Bug watch added: Debian Bug tracker #746662 http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=746662 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1591352 Title: Ubiquity copies efi boot information to wrong ESP To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubiquity/+bug/1591352/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1155216] Re: Unable to umount isodevice
This similar bug says to use toram boot paramater, but if installer offers to unmount partition, it still should do that. https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubiquity/+bug/684280 Post #14 by experimancer Fix is actully here: https://help.ubuntu.com/community/Grub2/ISOBoot (i.e add "toram" to relevant Grub2 menuentry or manually umount the /isodevice with "sudo umount -lrf /isodevice" and re-start the installation. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1155216 Title: Unable to umount isodevice To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubiquity/+bug/1155216/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1298719] Re: Cant install booting ISO from GRUB
See also: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubiquity/+bug/684280 https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubiquity/+bug/1155216 See Post #14 by experimancer Fix is actully here: https://help.ubuntu.com/community/Grub2/ISOBoot (i.e add "toram" to relevant Grub2 menuentry or manually umount the /isodevice with "sudo umount -lrf /isodevice" and re-start the installation. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1298719 Title: Cant install booting ISO from GRUB To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubiquity/+bug/1298719/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1155216] Re: Unable to umount isodevice
Same issue with 16.04 Xenial. Installer does ask if you want to unmount, but it does not unmount and hangs or gives errors. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1155216 Title: Unable to umount isodevice To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubiquity/+bug/1155216/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 986372] [NEW] openyahtzee never opens and processor at 100%
Public bug reported: Using 12.04 with fall-back mode and nVidia proprietary driver. openyahtzee (1.9-1) unstable; urgency=low top - 14:40:38 up 1 day, 23:23, 1 user, load average: 0.56, 0.50, 0.44 Tasks: 153 total, 2 running, 151 sleeping, 0 stopped, 0 zombie Cpu(s): 50.2%us, 0.2%sy, 0.0%ni, 49.6%id, 0.0%wa, 0.0%hi, 0.0%si, 0.0%st Mem: 4048544k total, 3848720k used, 199824k free, 1251984k buffers Swap: 7268664k total, 1768k used, 7266896k free, 1836364k cached PID USER PR NI VIRT RES SHR S %CPU %MEMTIME+ COMMAND 22404 fred 20 0 327m 12m 10m R 0.3 0:13.65 openyahtzee 10 root 20 0 000 S0 0.0 0:03.44 ksoftirqd/1 1309 root 20 0 158m 54m 18m S0 1.4 19:48.19 Xorg 22410 fred 20 0 568m 17m 11m S0 0.4 0:00.19 gnome-terminal 22471 fred 20 0 17332 1316 948 R0 0.0 0:00.01 top 1 root 20 0 24460 2008 1348 S0 0.0 0:00.66 init fred@fred-Precise:~$ echo $PATH /home/fred/bin:/usr/lib/lightdm/lightdm:/usr/local/sbin:/usr/local/bin:/usr/sbin:/usr/bin:/sbin:/bin:/usr/games fred@fred-Precise:~$ whereis openyahtzee openyahtzee: /usr/games/openyahtzee /usr/share/man/man6/openyahtzee.6.gz fred@fred-Precise:~$ fred@fred-Precise:~$ cat /etc/lsb-release DISTRIB_ID=Ubuntu DISTRIB_RELEASE=12.04 DISTRIB_CODENAME=precise DISTRIB_DESCRIPTION="Ubuntu precise (development branch)" ProblemType: Bug ApportVersion: 2.0.1-0ubuntu4 Architecture: amd64 Date: Fri Apr 20 15:12:20 2012 Dependencies: coreutils 8.13-3ubuntu3 debconf 1.5.42ubuntu1 debianutils 4.2.1ubuntu2 dpkg 1.16.1.2ubuntu7 fontconfig 2.8.0-3ubuntu9 fontconfig-config 2.8.0-3ubuntu9 gcc-4.6-base 4.6.3-1ubuntu5 iso-codes 3.31-1 libacl1 2.2.51-5ubuntu1 libatk1.0-0 2.4.0-0ubuntu1 libatk1.0-data 2.4.0-0ubuntu1 libattr1 1:2.4.46-5ubuntu1 libavahi-client3 0.6.30-5ubuntu2 libavahi-common-data 0.6.30-5ubuntu2 libavahi-common3 0.6.30-5ubuntu2 libbz2-1.0 1.0.6-1 libc-bin 2.15-0ubuntu9 libc6 2.15-0ubuntu9 libcairo2 1.10.2-6.1ubuntu2 libcomerr2 1.42-1ubuntu2 libcups2 1.5.2-9ubuntu1 libdatrie1 0.2.5-3 libdb5.1 5.1.25-11build1 libdbus-1-3 1.4.18-1ubuntu1 libdrm2 2.4.32-1ubuntu1 libelf1 0.152-1ubuntu3 libexpat1 2.0.1-7.2ubuntu1 libffi6 3.0.11~rc1-5 libfontconfig1 2.8.0-3ubuntu9 libfreetype6 2.4.8-1ubuntu2 libgcc1 1:4.6.3-1ubuntu5 libgcrypt11 1.5.0-3 libgdk-pixbuf2.0-0 2.26.1-1 libgdk-pixbuf2.0-common 2.26.1-1 libgl1-mesa-glx 8.0.2-0ubuntu3 libglapi-mesa 8.0.2-0ubuntu3 libglib2.0-0 2.32.1-0ubuntu2 libgnutls26 2.12.14-5ubuntu3 libgpg-error0 1.10-2ubuntu1 libgssapi-krb5-2 1.10+dfsg~beta1-2 libgstreamer-plugins-base0.10-0 0.10.36-1 libgstreamer0.10-0 0.10.36-1ubuntu1 libgtk2.0-0 2.24.10-0ubuntu6 libgtk2.0-common 2.24.10-0ubuntu6 libice6 2:1.0.7-2build1 libjasper1 1.900.1-13 libjpeg-turbo8 1.1.90+svn733-0ubuntu4 libjpeg8 8c-2ubuntu7 libk5crypto3 1.10+dfsg~beta1-2 libkeyutils1 1.5.2-2 libkrb5-3 1.10+dfsg~beta1-2 libkrb5support0 1.10+dfsg~beta1-2 liblzma5 5.1.1alpha+20110809-3 liborc-0.4-0 1:0.4.16-1ubuntu2 libp11-kit0 0.12-2ubuntu1 libpam-modules 1.1.3-7ubuntu2 libpam-modules-bin 1.1.3-7ubuntu2 libpam0g 1.1.3-7ubuntu2 libpango1.0-0 1.30.0-0ubuntu2 libpcre3 8.12-4 libpixman-1-0 0.24.4-1 libpng12-0 1.2.46-3ubuntu4 libselinux1 2.1.0-4.1ubuntu1 libsm6 2:1.2.0-2build1 libsqlite3-0 3.7.9-2ubuntu1 libstdc++6 4.6.3-1ubuntu5 libtasn1-3 2.10-1ubuntu1 libthai-data 0.1.16-3 libthai0 0.1.16-3 libtiff4 3.9.5-2ubuntu1 libtinfo5 5.9-4 libuuid1 2.20.1-1ubuntu3 libwxbase2.8-0 2.8.12.1-6ubuntu2 libwxgtk2.8-0 2.8.12.1-6ubuntu2 libx11-6 2:1.4.99.1-0ubuntu2 libx11-data 2:1.4.99.1-0ubuntu2 libx11-xcb1 2:1.4.99.1-0ubuntu2 libxau6 1:1.0.6-4 libxcb-glx0 1.8.1-1 libxcb-render0 1.8.1-1 libxcb-shm0 1.8.1-1 libxcb1 1.8.1-1 libxcomposite1 1:0.4.3-2build1 libxcursor1 1:1.1.12-1 libxdamage1 1:1.1.3-2build1 libxdmcp6 1:1.1.0-4 libxext6 2:1.3.0-3build1 libxfixes3 1:5.0-4ubuntu4 libxft2 2.2.0-3ubuntu2 libxi6 2:1.6.0-0ubuntu2 libxinerama1 2:1.1.1-3build1 libxml2 2.7.8.dfsg-5.1ubuntu4 libxrandr2 2:1.3.2-2 libxrender1 1:0.9.6-2build1 libxxf86vm1 1:1.1.1-2build1 lsb-base 4.0-0ubuntu20 multiarch-support 2.15-0ubuntu9 ncurses-bin 5.9-4 passwd 1:4.1.4.2+svn3283-3ubuntu5 perl-base 5.14.2-6ubuntu2 sed 4.2.1-9 sensible-utils 0.0.6ubuntu2 shared-mime-info 1.0-0ubuntu4 tar 1.26-4ubuntu1 ttf-dejavu-core 2.33-2ubuntu1 tzdata 2012b-1 ucf 3.0025+nmu2ubuntu1 x11-common 1:7.6+12ubuntu1 xz-utils 5.1.1alpha+20110809-3 zlib1g 1:1.2.3.4.dfsg-3ubuntu4 DistroRelease: Ubuntu 12.04 InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 12.04 LTS "Precise Pangolin" - Alpha amd64 (2007) NonfreeKernelModules: nvidia Package: openyahtzee 1.9-1 PackageArchitecture: amd64 ProcEnviron: TERM=xterm SHELL=/bin/bash PATH=(custom, user) LANG=en_US.UTF-8 ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 3.2.0-23.36-generic 3.2.14 SourcePackage: openyahtzee Tags: precise Uname: Linux 3.2.0-2
[Bug 986372] Re: openyahtzee never opens and processor at 100%
Ran backtrace If I run openyahtzee from command line, processor #1 goes to 100%, If I try running it again then both processors show 100% until I kill the process. No window ever opens. ** Attachment added: "gdb-openyahtzee.txt" https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/openyahtzee/+bug/986372/+attachment/3099270/+files/gdb-openyahtzee.txt -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/986372 Title: openyahtzee never opens and processor at 100% To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/openyahtzee/+bug/986372/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 813387] Re: Ubiquity allows to install GRUB into Windows partition (dangerous and useless option)
Is Ubiquity separate from grub2's installer? This supposedly was fixed with 10.10 and grub 1.98. Kansasnoob bug report: http://art.ubuntuforums.org/showthread.php?t=1475385 https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/grub2/+bug/576724 http://www.mail-archive.com/lucid-changes@lists.ubuntu.com/msg11327.html Only offer partitions containing /, /boot, or /boot/grub for grub-install; installing to other partitions may have harmful effects such as making Windows unbootable, and installing GRUB to every single partition is likely to result in confusion anyway (LP: #576724). -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/813387 Title: Ubiquity allows to install GRUB into Windows partition (dangerous and useless option) To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubiquity/+bug/813387/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1265192] Re: Install/reinstall wipes out all/other partitions
LVM install wipes out entire drive. With alternative installer in 12.04 it clearly said full drive install. But with 14.04 LVM says easy partitioning so new users choose it and erase entire drive. http://ubuntuforums.org/showthread.php?t=2233313 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1265192 Title: Install/reinstall wipes out all/other partitions To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubiquity/+bug/1265192/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1265192] Re: Install/reinstall wipes out all/other partitions
This user selected reinstall and it showed just his partitions. But then it erased all. http://ubuntuforums.org/showthread.php?t=2231525 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1265192 Title: Install/reinstall wipes out all/other partitions To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubiquity/+bug/1265192/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1479040] Re: wineserver segfault with kernel 3.13.0-59-generic
Several users in Ubuntu Forum also having same issue, including me. http://ubuntuforums.org/showthread.php?t=2288589 Manually starting wine server first in terminal worked, but error still flashed by as I started Picasa. wineserver -p -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1479040 Title: wineserver segfault with kernel 3.13.0-59-generic To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/wine1.6/+bug/1479040/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1448707] Re: cant launch Windows 8 with the Ubuntu grub2 boot(the windows option doesnt work)
Have you tried adding this to Windows BCD with Windows bcdEdit?
bcdedit /set {bootmgr} path \EFI\ubuntu\grubx64.efi
Grub only works is secure boot is off. Not sure if shimx64.efi would
work from Windows with secure boot on or not.
Many systems need work arounds as vendors/mfgs violate UEFI standards
and use description as part of UEFI boot. And only description allowed
is "Windows". In those cases another work around is to copy grubx64.efi
or shimx64.efi into /EFI/Boot and rename to bootx64.efi. Then in UEFI
select hard drive as boot option.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1448707
Title:
cant launch Windows 8 with the Ubuntu grub2 boot(the windows option
doesnt work)
To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/shim/+bug/1448707/+subscriptions
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1469300] Re: windows 8.1 don't boot after installing ubuntu 14.04. Wanted to reinstall windows 8.1 but PC won't let me due to a partition problem
Not a shim issue. Windows only only installs to NTFS partitions. Or drives with space for NTFS partition. Also Windows installer booted in BIOS mode will not install to gpt partitioned drive. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1469300 Title: windows 8.1 don't boot after installing ubuntu 14.04. Wanted to reinstall windows 8.1 but PC won't let me due to a partition problem To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/shim/+bug/1469300/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1283830] Re: win8.1+winxp+linux: winxp don't detected by update-grub
Not grub issue. Windows only has boot files in one NTFS primary partition with boot flag. It looks like you may have run Boot-Repair which copied boot files from sda1 to sda2. But your XP install probably has no boot files in it for os-prober to find. If all installs of Windows are on primary partitions you can move boot flag to that install and run Windows repairs to add the correct boot files for Widnows. Then os-prober can find it. Otherwise it is a two step boot process as Windows adds all installs to BCD and from grub you boot Windows, then from Windows choose which Windows to boot. Installing XP after Windows 8 may be another Windows issue also as XP cannot add 8 to its boot.ini. But updating Windows 8 shoudl then add XP to BCD to boot from Windows 8. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1283830 Title: win8.1+winxp+linux: winxp don't detected by update-grub To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/grub2/+bug/1283830/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1418706] Re: Vivid: UEFI: blank drive incorrectly detected as existing BIOS-mode install
It is my understanding that ESP is the correct full Initials (name) for what we often just call the efi partition. EFI System Partition (ESP) Ubuntu installers have referred to the ESP by the name "EFI boot partition," But use of boot partition has confused new users thinking that is Ubuntu's boot partition or they need another /boot partition or do not need a /boot partition when they may need one. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1418706 Title: Vivid: UEFI: blank drive incorrectly detected as existing BIOS-mode install To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/partman-efi/+bug/1418706/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1172065] Re: 12.04.2 incorrect file name signed efi amd6.deb
It now looks like in 12.04.3 that both 6 and 4 are missing from end of file name. The change from 3.9 to 3.10 added a character, so one more was dropped from end of file. Seems like an issue with file name length on ISO. Original file on server is probably correct. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1172065 Title: 12.04.2 incorrect file name signed efi amd6.deb To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/1172065/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1226912] Re: ubiquity starts but does not appear
With yesterdays update my work around of using bash instead of sh and from terminal worked. Updated again today and now I cannot install from icon nor with terminal bash workaround. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1226912 Title: ubiquity starts but does not appear To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubiquity/+bug/1226912/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1256874] Re: warning colour needed when the entire disk will be used
The issue is not just the 4 primary partitions in use with MBR. We are seeing the the forums many users over writing UEFI Windows with gpt partitioning. Again not sure if just user error or why it is occurring but it is a lot more than one or two accidentally picking wrong choice. Several have chosen LVM as it says 'easier' partitioning and it seems to overwrite entire drive without any warnings at all. Same with encrypted LVM. Several have installed with dual boot Windows, had major issues with Ubuntu, so they elected to reinstall. Menu said overwrite existing Ubuntu install, but erased entire drive, including Windows & recovery partitions. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1256874 Title: warning colour needed when the entire disk will be used To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/hundredpapercuts/+bug/1256874/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1226912] Re: ubiquity wont start ubuntu
Similar issue. I use grub loop mount to boot ISO, so I did not know if that was issue. Could not get Ubiquity to start (or seem to). Tried rebooting ISO several times. Then tried using commands in Icon's properties at command line and it said Ubuquity was running, but nothing was happening. Then rebooted and changed command line from sh to sudo bash and it ran without issue. The sh command in Icon did not seem to be launching shell but bash did? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1226912 Title: ubiquity wont start ubuntu To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubiquity/+bug/1226912/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1172065] Re: 12.04.2 incorrect file name signed efi amd6.deb
Orginal error was in ISO itself. Above error seems to be just when written with certain tools that file name is too long to be converted from ISO correctly. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1172065 Title: 12.04.2 incorrect file name signed efi amd6.deb To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/1172065/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1172065] Re: 12.04.2 incorrect file name signed efi amd6.deb
** Changed in: linux (Ubuntu) Status: Expired => New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1172065 Title: 12.04.2 incorrect file name signed efi amd6.deb To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/1172065/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1049549] Re: Ubiquity manual partitioning offers to install grub in a way that breaks Windows boot
We still see this. I see about one user a week having this issue and I have to have them use testdisk to restore backup or use Windows repairs to fix. It seems to be in several different places. Original install under Something Else or dpgk reinstall of grub. But in all cases it seems that partitions with essential boot code already in them are offered as choices for grub2 to install into. Supposed fixed long time ago? https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/grub2/+bug/576724 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1049549 Title: Ubiquity manual partitioning offers to install grub in a way that breaks Windows boot To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubiquity/+bug/1049549/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1155216] Re: Unable to umount isodevice
Now getting same issue with UEFI boot and Wily. ISO on sdb, boot is from sda as that is all the grub allows with UEFI. And it automounts a partition in sda (random partition?) as /isodevice. So then it will not let install to another partition on sda. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1155216 Title: Unable to umount isodevice To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubiquity/+bug/1155216/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1493615] Re: update-grub ignores linux partition
Your boot entries with kernel 3.19 would be from your 15.04 install. All your installs are BIOS based on MBR partitioned drives. So rEFInd will not work as it is for UEFI systems with gpt partitioned drives. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1493615 Title: update-grub ignores linux partition To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/grub2/+bug/1493615/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1450783] Re: grub-install with --bootloader-id option creates unusable boot configuration with secure boot
I changed GRUB_DISTRIBUTOR so I could tell which install was which. I have my main working 14.04LTS install on sda, but install other test installs on sdb. I try to install grub to ESP - efi system partition on sdb and installer even says installing to sdb. But it always installs to sda. I then try renaming so I can keep them separate in UEFI. All of these are grubx64.efi with different grub.cfg with different configfile entries for different UUIDs. /efi/BOOT/bootx64.efi /efi/trusty/grubx64.efi /efi/ubuntu/grubx64.efi /efi/vivid/grubx64.efi But they all use the one grub.cfg in /efi/ubuntu. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1450783 Title: grub-install with --bootloader-id option creates unusable boot configuration with secure boot To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/grub2/+bug/1450783/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 982485] Re: nvidia 295.40 breaks unity 3d
In my case with fallback mode and 3d the close, min, max buttons totally disappeared. Only when I changed to 2d mode did icons reappear. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/982485 Title: nvidia 295.40 breaks unity 3d To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/unity/+bug/982485/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1265192] Re: Reinstallation wipes out all/other partitions
One more: http://askubuntu.com/questions/488708/cannot-access-windows-after-re-installing-ubuntu-on-dual-boot-pc -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1265192 Title: Reinstallation wipes out all/other partitions To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubiquity/+bug/1265192/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1289977] Re: Ubuntu 14.04 Update breaks grub, resulting in "error: symbol 'grub_term_highlight_color' not found"
Boot-Repair does the rename for 'buggy' UEFI. Many HP & Sonys only boot with one of the fixes as the UEFI is hard coded to only boot Windows. The rename then lets UEFI think it boots Windows efi file but really boots to grub menu. But then Windows entry in UEFI only boots grub. bkpbootmgfw.efi That file is the Windows boot file and grub or shim are renamed to bootmgfw.efi. Best to undo that before anything else, either with Boot-Repair or manually as that confuses all the other issues: Always say no until proven that you only can boot Windows entry from UEFI menu. buggy-kernel detected. Do you want to activate [Backup and rename Windows EFI files]? yes (if any choice fails, please retry with the other) To undo & to rename files to their original names, you just need to tick the "Restore EFI backups" option of Boot-Repair. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1289977 Title: Ubuntu 14.04 Update breaks grub, resulting in "error: symbol 'grub_term_highlight_color' not found" To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/grub2/+bug/1289977/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1267204] Re: Option to "remove Ubuntu 12.04 and replace it with Ubuntu 13.10" removes other partitions not related to UBUNTU
May be duplicate of this: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubiquity/+bug/1265192 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1267204 Title: Option to "remove Ubuntu 12.04 and replace it with Ubuntu 13.10" removes other partitions not related to UBUNTU To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubiquity/+bug/1267204/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1172065] Re: 12.04.2 incorrect file name signed efi amd6.deb
This user found more issues and created a perl script to rename files correctly. http://cirrus.ucsd.edu/~pierce/fix_ubuntu_usb/ ** Changed in: linux (Ubuntu) Status: Incomplete => Confirmed -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1172065 Title: 12.04.2 incorrect file name signed efi amd6.deb To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/1172065/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1226912] Re: ubiquity starts but does not appear
Daily's have not worked. Just tried jerrylamos' workaround and it did not work for me. Entire contents of installer debug. Ubiquity 2.15.20 (ubiquity:3886): Pango-WARNING **: error opening config file '/root/.config/pango/pangorc': Permission denied Ubiquity 2.15.20 /root does not have read nor execute permissions, but there is nothing in it. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1226912 Title: ubiquity starts but does not appear To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubiquity/+bug/1226912/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1366546] Re: Ubuntu doesn't provide \EFI\BOOT\BOOTX64.EFI for UEFI systems
I have not read the spec but saw this: UEFI 2.3 -it is permitted for the firmware to treat the EFI system partition in the same way as removable media or use bootx64.efi http://mjg59.dreamwidth.org/4125.html And many UEFI implementations, all of HP & Sony that I have seen in Ubuntu forums will only boot "Windows" and usually copying grubx64.efi is one work around that then lets users boot. Real solution is that vendors do not violate UEFI spec. Vendors violated UEFI specs - http://hwe.ubuntu.com/docs/ubuntu-bios-uefi-requirements.pdf [quote]Firmware should not enforce any boot policy other than the mechanism specified in Section 3 of the UEFI 2.3.1 specification [UEFI 2.3.1]. Specifically, firmware should not modify boot behaviour de- pending on the Description field of the EFI_LOAD_OPTION descriptor.[/quote] -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1366546 Title: Ubuntu doesn't provide \EFI\BOOT\BOOTX64.EFI for UEFI systems To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/grub2/+bug/1366546/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1090829] Re: grub-efi fails to install with Input/output error
Edit - found reference to the bit that is set, but need to find how to reset it. It is intended for other efi type partitions like a vendor recovery so users would not damage a vendor recovery. If HP is setting it on the efi partition it is wrong. Bug is not really related to current issue. https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+s...fi/+bug/811485 Quote from UEFI spec: Partition creators may prevent UEFI firmware from examining and using a specific partition by setting bit 1 of the Partition Attributes (see 5.3.3) which will exclude the partition as a potential ESP. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1090829 Title: grub-efi fails to install with Input/output error To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/dosfstools/+bug/1090829/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 876499] Re: Incorrect Nvidia driver installed by checking 3rd party box
The additional drivers now shows three entries. The installed 173, current and an updated which I gather is the current but will be updated? Is this left over from alpha or beta as it seemed then the only driver was the 173 as there were issues with everything else? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/876499 Title: Incorrect Nvidia driver installed by checking 3rd party box To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubiquity/+bug/876499/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1068456] Re: Depends on linux-headers-generic | linux-headers so linux-headers-3.5.0-17-generic is not installed & kernel module is not built
After install of 12.10 and reboot, it does not work. Typical black screen. Added nomodeset to grub parameter on boot line & it then does boot. But for a new user that is a huge issue, that it just does not work. No pop-up like previous versions on proprietary drivers are available. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1068456 Title: Depends on linux-headers-generic | linux-headers so linux- headers-3.5.0-17-generic is not installed & kernel module is not built To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/fglrx/+bug/1068456/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1068456] Re: Depends on linux-headers-generic | linux-headers so linux-headers-3.5.0-17-generic is not installed & kernel module is not built
I reported under the wrong bug report. Mine is nVidia. These all seem related to me: This one has the most reports: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/nvidia-graphics-drivers-updates/+bug/1068341 https://bugs.launchpad.net/fglrx/+bug/1068456 https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubiquity/+bug/1068488 https://bugs.launchpad.net/fglrx/+bug/1068661 Has what worked for me, install headers & dpkg update. flagged as duplicate of 10668341 https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/nvidia-graphics-drivers-updates/+bug/1068942 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1068456 Title: Depends on linux-headers-generic | linux-headers so linux- headers-3.5.0-17-generic is not installed & kernel module is not built To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/fglrx/+bug/1068456/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 807801] Re: grub-update fails to detect windows bootloader on a uefi system
It used to not create an entry at all, but now creates the standard BIOS/mbr entry when it needs to be a different UEFI/gpt type entry. See this: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/grub2/+bug/1024383 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/807801 Title: grub-update fails to detect windows bootloader on a uefi system To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/grub2/+bug/807801/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 914926] [NEW] no loop module - alternate-amd64.iso current precise
Public bug reported: Trying to loop mount the alternative installer: Jan 11 17:53:41 iso-scan: devices found: '/dev/sda1 /dev/sda2 /dev/sda3 /dev/sda4 /dev/sdb1 /dev/sdc1 /dev/sdc2 /dev/sdc5 /dev/sdc6 /dev/sda /dev/sdb /dev/sdc' Jan 11 17:53:44 iso-scan: selected_device(s)='/dev/sdb1' Jan 11 17:53:45 iso-scan: Mounted /dev/sdb1 for first pass Jan 11 17:53:45 iso-scan: Found ISO ./ubuntu-12.04-alternate-amd64.iso on /dev/sdb1 Jan 11 17:53:45 kernel: [ 182.795977] ISO 9660 Extensions: Microsoft Joliet Level 3 Jan 11 17:53:45 kernel: [ 182.804792] ISO 9660 Extensions: RRIP_1991A Jan 11 17:53:45 iso-scan: Detected ISO with 'precise' (precise) distribution Jan 11 17:53:45 iso-scan: Detected ISO with distribution 'precise' (precise) Jan 11 17:53:45 iso-scan: Ubuntu ISO ./ubuntu-12.04-alternate-amd64.iso usable Jan 11 17:53:45 main-menu[343]: (process:12213): FATAL: Module loop not found. Jan 11 17:53:45 main-menu[343]: WARNING **: Configuring 'iso-scan' failed with error code 1 Jan 11 17:53:45 main-menu[343]: WARNING **: Menu item 'iso-scan' failed. Many of us use grub2 to loopmount ISO files to install either from another drive or flash drive. With flash drives now lower in cost for larger capacities, I usually install several versions in one flash drive and use grub2 to loop mount the ISO files. ** Affects: debian-installer (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/914926 Title: no loop module - alternate-amd64.iso current precise To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/debian-installer/+bug/914926/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1172065] [NEW] 12.04.2 incorrect file name signed efi amd6.deb
Public bug reported: download ISO has wrong nameamd6 should be amd64. In /pool/main/g/grub2-signed grub-efi-amd64-signed_1.9~ubuntu12.04.3+1.99-21ubuntu3.9_amd6.deb seems like it should be grub-efi-amd64-signed_1.9~ubuntu12.04.3+1.99-21ubuntu3.9_amd64.deb See Also http://ubuntuforums.org/showthread.php?t=2138041 Just downloaded the ISO and it still has wrong name. Compared to Raring and Raring has correct name. ** Affects: linux (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: Incomplete -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1172065 Title: 12.04.2 incorrect file name signed efi amd6.deb To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/1172065/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1172065] Re: 12.04.2 incorrect file name signed efi amd6.deb
There is no log. It is just a wrong file name in the install ISO. It is not a file I use as it is UEFI secure boot & I only have ISO. But file is still wrong. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1172065 Title: 12.04.2 incorrect file name signed efi amd6.deb To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/1172065/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 986372] Re: Main window doesn't appear, CPU usage at 100% (after config file created on first run)
My workaround was to download into my test install of 12.10 and copy that .deb file into 12.04. That newer version then worked and I did not have to recompile myself. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/986372 Title: Main window doesn't appear, CPU usage at 100% (after config file created on first run) To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/openyahtzee/+bug/986372/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1172065] Re: 12.04.2 incorrect file name signed efi amd6.deb
Attached screenshot here: http://ubuntuforums.org/showthread.php?t=2138041&p=12617434#post12617434 I downloaded copy from this mirror: http://mirror.anl.gov/pub/ubuntu-iso/DVDs-Ubuntu/12.04.2/ That has a 14-Feb-2013 date. Many users in Forum said they could not boot liveCD with secure boot on. I always have said to turn if off. Is this part of the reason? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1172065 Title: 12.04.2 incorrect file name signed efi amd6.deb To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/1172065/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1111950] Re: Ubiquity should be able to install both grub-pc and grub-efi when needed
I like to create flash drives that I can use to boot muliple systems. I then want my flash drive configured to be able to boot system whether UEFI or BIOS like the installer flash drive. But the installer uses syslinux for BIOS and grub for UEFI. I really just want grub for both. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/950 Title: Ubiquity should be able to install both grub-pc and grub-efi when needed To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubiquity/+bug/950/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1159016] Re: 12.10 64bit live-USB successfully boots, but without persistence on UEFI pc
The live installer boots with syslinux for BIOS and grub for UEFI. So I think you have to edit grub menu for persistence as with UEFI syslinux is not used. Not sure how to do that, as I do not use persistence. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1159016 Title: 12.10 64bit live-USB successfully boots, but without persistence on UEFI pc To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/usb-creator/+bug/1159016/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1061255] Re: GRUB recognizes defunct LDM headers
I do not like suggesting dd to new users.
In this thread just adding a Windows 7 boot stanza to 40_custom worked.
Grub legacy almost never found Windows 7 either and we almost always had
to add the boot stanza for Windows 7 to menu.lst.
http://ubuntuforums.org/showthread.php?t=2088596
See post #12, user said it worked in #13
#Add menu entry to 40_custom, first find correct UUID
sudo blkid
Adjust boot stanza entry for UUID and example partition sda1 and (hd0,1)
to which evey partition Windows boots from.
gksudo gedit /etc/grub.d/40_custom
#update grub menu
sudo update-grub
menuentry "Windows 7 (loader) (on /dev/sda1)" {
insmod ntfs
set root=(hd0,1)
search --no-floppy --fs-uuid --set 908A5B7D8A5B5F32
chainloader +1
}
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1061255
Title:
GRUB recognizes defunct LDM headers
To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/grub2/+bug/1061255/+subscriptions
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 941075] Re: package cups 1.5.2-5 failed to install/upgrade: ErrorMessage: subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 1
-- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/941075 Title: package cups 1.5.2-5 failed to install/upgrade: ErrorMessage: subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 1 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/cups/+bug/941075/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 941075] [NEW] package cups 1.5.2-5 failed to install/upgrade: ErrorMessage: subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 1
Public bug reported: Running Update from previous install. ProblemType: Package DistroRelease: Ubuntu 12.04 Package: cups 1.5.2-5 ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 3.2.0-11.19-generic 3.2.1 Uname: Linux 3.2.0-11-generic x86_64 ApportVersion: 1.93-0ubuntu2 Architecture: amd64 CupsErrorLog: Date: Sat Feb 25 14:49:08 2012 ErrorMessage: ErrorMessage: subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 1 InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 12.04 LTS "Precise Pangolin" - Alpha amd64 (20120111) Lpstat: Error: command ['lpstat', '-v'] failed with exit code -11: p11-kit: duplicate configured module: gnome-keyring-module: /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/pkcs11/gnome-keyring-pkcs11.so MachineType: TOSHIBA Satellite A105 Papersize: letter PccardctlIdent: Socket 0: no product info available PccardctlStatus: Socket 0: no card ProcKernelCmdLine: BOOT_IMAGE=/boot/vmlinuz-3.2.0-11-generic root=UUID=dd7fece0-88ff-43bd-a83a-93943f57482d ro quiet splash vt.handoff=7 SourcePackage: cups Title: package cups 1.5.2-5 failed to install/upgrade: ErrorMessage: subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 1 UpgradeStatus: Upgraded to precise on 2012-02-25 (0 days ago) dmi.bios.date: 08/30/2006 dmi.bios.vendor: Phoenix Technologies LTD dmi.bios.version: 2.00 dmi.board.name: MPAD-MSAE Customer Reference Boards dmi.board.vendor: Intel Corporation dmi.board.version: Not Applicable dmi.chassis.asset.tag: No Asset Tag dmi.chassis.type: 1 dmi.chassis.vendor: No Enclosure dmi.chassis.version: N/A dmi.modalias: dmi:bvnPhoenixTechnologiesLTD:bvr2.00:bd08/30/2006:svnTOSHIBA:pnSatelliteA105:pvrPSAA8U-14F02K:rvnIntelCorporation:rnMPAD-MSAECustomerReferenceBoards:rvrNotApplicable:cvnNoEnclosure:ct1:cvrN/A: dmi.product.name: Satellite A105 dmi.product.version: PSAA8U-14F02K dmi.sys.vendor: TOSHIBA ** Affects: cups (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Tags: amd64 apport-package precise -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/941075 Title: package cups 1.5.2-5 failed to install/upgrade: ErrorMessage: subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 1 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/cups/+bug/941075/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 876499] Re: Incorrect Nvidia driver installed by checking 3rd party box
Just installed 12.04. Same issue but worse. Could not get to graphical screens at all. Alt-f2 gave me command line. Did updates Nov 10, 2011 and still would not fully boot. Uninstalled 173, installed nvidia-current , finally got to gui, but it used default video as it then popped up saying I could install proprietary drivers. fred@fred-Precise:~$ dpkg-query -l | grep nvidia rc nvidia-173 173.14.30-0ubuntu8 NVIDIA binary Xorg driver, kernel module and VDPAU library ii nvidia-common 1:0.2.35 Find obsolete NVIDIA drivers ii nvidia-current 285.05.09-0ubuntu1 NVIDIA binary Xorg driver, kernel module and VDPAU library ii nvidia-current-updates 285.05.09-0ubuntu1 NVIDIA binary Xorg driver, kernel module and VDPAU library ii nvidia-settings280.13-0ubuntu4 Tool of configuring the NVIDIA graphics driver ii nvidia-settings-updates280.13-0ubuntu1 Tool of configuring the NVIDIA graphics driver -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/876499 Title: Incorrect Nvidia driver installed by checking 3rd party box To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubiquity/+bug/876499/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 604743] [NEW] grub-pc in gpt drive does not boot other drives
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: grub2 grub-pc installed on gpt drive sdb boots Ubuntu install on sdb but will not boot windows in sda or other Ubuntu installs in sdc. Since I was booting directly from sdb I tried changing drive numbers 0,1, & 2 in set root with same results. Windows boot error: error: no such device 046 (correct UUID for win on sda1 NTFS) error: invalid signature Ubuntu boot error for install on sdc5 error: not such device 1174... (corrrect UUID for Ubuntu on sdc5) error: you need to load the kernel first Same as above for sdc7 with correct UUID for sdc7 shown. f...@fred-dtgpt:~$ apt-cache policy grub-pc grub-pc: Installed: 1.98-1ubuntu6 Candidate: 1.98-1ubuntu6 Version table: *** 1.98-1ubuntu6 0 500 http://ubuntu.mirrors.tds.net/pub/ubuntu/ lucid-updates/main Packages 100 /var/lib/dpkg/status 1.98-1ubuntu5 0 500 http://ubuntu.mirrors.tds.net/pub/ubuntu/ lucid/main Packages f...@fred-dtgpt:~$ uname -a Linux fred-DTgpt 2.6.32-23-generic #37-Ubuntu SMP Fri Jun 11 08:03:28 UTC 2010 x86_64 GNU/Linux f...@fred-dtgpt:~$ lsb_release -d Description:Ubuntu 10.04 LTS f...@fred-dtgpt:~$ sudo grub-install /dev/sdb Installation finished. No error reported. f...@fred-dtgpt:~$ sudo update-grub Generating grub.cfg ... Found linux image: /boot/vmlinuz-2.6.32-23-generic Found initrd image: /boot/initrd.img-2.6.32-23-generic Found linux image: /boot/vmlinuz-2.6.32-22-generic Found initrd image: /boot/initrd.img-2.6.32-22-generic Found linux image: /boot/vmlinuz-2.6.32-21-generic Found initrd image: /boot/initrd.img-2.6.32-21-generic Found memtest86+ image: /boot/memtest86+.bin Found Microsoft Windows XP Professional on /dev/sda1 Found Ubuntu 9.10 (9.10) on /dev/sdc5 Found Ubuntu 10.04 LTS (10.04) on /dev/sdc7 done I was helping this user and he had the same issue. He converted drive to MBR and reinstalled. http://ubuntuforums.org/showthread.php?t=1528910 ** Affects: grub2 (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- grub-pc in gpt drive does not boot other drives https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/604743 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 604743] Fix Worked insmod part_msdos
I use c and at grub> prompt insmod part_msdos. Both windows and Ubuntu then booted ok (a little slow it seemed in switching to Ubuntu, windows is always slow so I could not tell any difference.) Glad you already had a fix. How would I have found this. I occasionally review grub errors and other documentation. Thanks, Fred -- grub-pc in gpt drive does not boot other drives https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/604743 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 604743] Added to 40_custom & works
> > To make this permanent, the simplest option for now is probably to edit > /etc/grub.d/40_custom and add 'insmod part_msdos' at the very end of > that file, after the comments. > I added insmod part_msdos to 40_custom & both windows on sda1 and Ubuntu on sdc5 booted without any issues. Thanks Fred -- grub-pc in gpt drive does not boot other drives https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/604743 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
