[Bug 237612] Re: Heron freezing with latest kernel (2.6.24-18)
Sorry, I gave up a while ago on all hope of getting the attention of anyone in a position to help with the problem (see the question at the end of my previous comment on this bug) and was forced to abandon the hardware on which I was experiencing the problem, so I am no longer in a position to perform the testing you are requesting. -- Heron freezing with latest kernel (2.6.24-18) https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/237612 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 237612] Re: Heron freezing with latest kernel (2.6.24-18)
Thanks, Leann. Can I get an answer to my question, please? > What can I as a mere mortal do differently when I file a > bug report for a serious show-stopper like this in order > to get the attention of those doing triage on the > incoming reports? [See my post to the issue on June 6 for fuller context.] -- Heron freezing with latest kernel (2.6.24-18) https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/237612 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 296937] [NEW] Firefox not rendering pages from Windows web server correctly
Public bug reported:
Binary package hint: firefox-3.0
Firefox 3.0.3 on Ubuntu 10.4 is rendering the same HTML page differently
depending on which server it gets the page from, and if it gets the page
from a Windows server, it's not rendering the page correctly. Now, I'm
no more a fan of Windows than the next Ubuntu user, but it's not
practical (yet) to avoid every site hosted on a Windows server. I have
attached a screenshot showing what the page looks like when it's served
up by Windows [1], and I'll attach another screenshot showing the exact
same page pulled from a Linux server.[2] Note, for example, that when
the page is pulled from the Windows server the CSS for displaying the
borders between cells is not honored for all of the cells ("Jim's Juice"
and "Crocinic Acid" are in separate cells, but you can't tell that from
what Firefox displays - though you can if you look at the HTML source).
Here are the HTTP headers coming from the Windows web server (as
reported by wget):
$ wget -S -O repro-from-windows.html
"http://mahler.nci.nih.gov/firefox-on-ubuntu-repro.html";
--14:51:43-- http://mahler.nci.nih.gov/firefox-on-ubuntu-repro.html
=> `repro-from-windows.html'
Resolving mahler.nci.nih.gov... 156.40.134.102
Connecting to mahler.nci.nih.gov|156.40.134.102|:80... connected.
HTTP request sent, awaiting response...
HTTP/1.1 200 OK
Content-Length: 2419
Content-Type: text/html
Last-Modified: Tue, 11 Nov 2008 19:45:16 GMT
Accept-Ranges: bytes
ETag: "aca06a53644c91:8f0"
Server: Microsoft-IIS/6.0
MicrosoftOfficeWebServer: 5.0_Pub
X-Powered-By: ASP.NET
Date: Tue, 11 Nov 2008 19:50:51 GMT
Connection: keep-alive
Length: 2,419 (2.4K) [text/html]
100%[>] 2,419 --.--K/s
14:51:43 (203.54 KB/s) - `repro-from-windows.html' saved [2419/2419]
Same thing for the page from the Linux server:
$ wget -S -O repro-from-linux.html
"http://www.rksystems.com/firefox-on-ubuntu-repro.html";
--14:51:06-- http://www.rksystems.com/firefox-on-ubuntu-repro.html
=> `repro-from-linux.html'
Resolving www.rksystems.com... 66.92.147.60
Connecting to www.rksystems.com|66.92.147.60|:80... connected.
HTTP request sent, awaiting response...
HTTP/1.1 200 OK
Date: Tue, 11 Nov 2008 19:51:03 GMT
Server: Apache/2.2.3 (Debian) DAV/2 SVN/1.4.2 mod_python/3.2.10 Python/2.4.4
PHP/4.4.4-8+etch6 mod_ssl/2.2.3 OpenSSL/0.9.8c
Last-Modified: Tue, 11 Nov 2008 19:33:52 GMT
ETag: "1904c4-973-45b6ef59bc800"
Accept-Ranges: bytes
Content-Length: 2419
Keep-Alive: timeout=15, max=100
Connection: Keep-Alive
Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8
Length: 2,419 (2.4K) [text/html]
100%[>] 2,419 --.--K/s
14:51:06 (128.73 MB/s) - `repro-from-linux.html' saved [2419/2419]
The version of Firefox is 3.0.3+build1+nobinonly-0ubuntu0.8.04.1. This
problem is not present for Firefox 3.0.3 on Windows, and I can get other
browsers on the same Ubuntu client to behave correctly, so this is
specific to Firefox on Ubuntu.
[1] http://mahler.nci.nih.gov/firefox-on-ubuntu-repro.html
[2] http://rksystems.com/firefox-on-ubuntu-repro.html
** Affects: firefox-3.0 (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
--
Firefox not rendering pages from Windows web server correctly
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/296937
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 296937] Re: Firefox not rendering pages from Windows web server correctly
** Attachment added: "portion of Firefox window displaying web page from Windows server" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/19574858/repro-from-windows.png -- Firefox not rendering pages from Windows web server correctly https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/296937 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 296937] Re: Firefox not rendering pages from Windows web server correctly
Here's a screen shot for the same page, pulled by Firefox from Apache on Linux. ** Attachment added: "repro-from-linux.png" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/19574883/repro-from-linux.png -- Firefox not rendering pages from Windows web server correctly https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/296937 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 298126] [NEW] package samba-common 2:3.2.3-1ubuntu3 failed to install/upgrade:
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: samba I got thrown into launchpad during an upgrade from Ubuntu 8.04 to 8.10. ProblemType: Package Architecture: i386 DistroRelease: Ubuntu 8.10 ErrorMessage: ErrorMessage: subprocess post-installation script returned error exit status 3 NonfreeKernelModules: nvidia ath_hal Package: samba-common 2:3.2.3-1ubuntu3 SourcePackage: samba Title: package samba-common 2:3.2.3-1ubuntu3 failed to install/upgrade: Uname: Linux 2.6.24-21-generic i686 ** Affects: samba (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Tags: apport-package -- package samba-common 2:3.2.3-1ubuntu3 failed to install/upgrade: https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/298126 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 298126] Re: package samba-common 2:3.2.3-1ubuntu3 failed to install/upgrade:
** Attachment added: "Dependencies.txt" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/19650473/Dependencies.txt ** Attachment added: "VarLogDistupgradeAptlog.gz" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/19650474/VarLogDistupgradeAptlog.gz ** Attachment added: "VarLogDistupgradeApttermlog.gz" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/19650475/VarLogDistupgradeApttermlog.gz ** Attachment added: "VarLogDistupgradeMainlog.gz" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/19650476/VarLogDistupgradeMainlog.gz ** Attachment added: "VarLogDistupgradeMainprereqlog.gz" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/19650477/VarLogDistupgradeMainprereqlog.gz ** Attachment added: "VarLogDistupgradeTermlog.gz" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/19650478/VarLogDistupgradeTermlog.gz -- package samba-common 2:3.2.3-1ubuntu3 failed to install/upgrade: https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/298126 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 298126] Re: package samba-common 2:3.2.3-1ubuntu3 failed to install/upgrade:
After the bug report was initially filed, the upgrade process aborted, with a warning that the system might not work properly. So what do I do now? -- package samba-common 2:3.2.3-1ubuntu3 failed to install/upgrade: https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/298126 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 193997] Re: Can't put hyperlink in cells
I have no idea. The first time I tried upgrading 8.04 to 8.10 the upgrade process blew up. I filed a bug report, but never got a response, so I'm sticking with 8.04 on all our machines. -- Can't put hyperlink in cells https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/193997 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 279676] Re: network manager applet whows red "x" even when network connected
I am confirming that this behavior is still present in Jaunty. network-manager: Installed: 0.7.1~rc4.1.cf199a964-0ubuntu2 Candidate: 0.7.1~rc4.1.cf199a964-0ubuntu2 Version table: *** 0.7.1~rc4.1.cf199a964-0ubuntu2 0 500 http://us.archive.ubuntu.com jaunty/main Packages 100 /var/lib/dpkg/status ** Changed in: network-manager-applet (Ubuntu) Status: Invalid => Confirmed -- network manager applet whows red "x" even when network connected https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/279676 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 132350] Re: Mozilla-thunderbird does not save drafts
I was tempted to create a new bug report, as this one does not exactly match the behavior I've observed with Thunderbird (which does save drafts -- just not all the time). Nor is 190877 the same (the reporter for that issue was trying to override default draft-saving behavior for multiple accounts, and I'm not trying to do that). Nevertheless, those two issues are close enough that I strongly suspect an attempt to create a new bug report would be marked as a duplicate of one of these, so I'll start off by adding my observations, and if encouraged to do so, will create a separate issue. Generally, saving a draft in Thunderbird does work for me, but occasionally TB will lose a draft, usually (always?) right after bringing up the draft, editing it, saving it, and closing the window for the draft. Happened again this morning. I had a message which had been sitting in the Drafts folder for at least a couple of weeks. I brought it up with a double-click, added a subject line, and then selected Save from the File menu. At this point I was asked for the password for another IMAP account than the one in whose Drafts folder this message lived. I assumed that it was just a coincidence that TB had decided to check for new messages for that account, but given what happened subsequently, I'm not so sure that assumption was correct. Since I didn't want the draft to be moved to the Drafts folder for the other account, in case my assumption wasn't right (why would TB want to do that?) I clicked Cancel to the password request. Then I closed the window for the draft message which I thought I had just saved. But then I noticed that the message was no longer in the drafts folder. Fortunately I take nightly backups of all my systems, but TB should not just throw away a message. I used to write email gateway software, and at the very top of the "no-no" list is throwing away a piece of mail silently. I would regard this is as a critical bug. Package: thunderbird Status: install ok installed Priority: optional Section: mail Installed-Size: 32024 Maintainer: Alexander Sack <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Architecture: i386 Version: 2.0.0.14+nobinonly-0ubuntu0.8.04.1 -- Mozilla-thunderbird does not save drafts https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/132350 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 132350] Re: Mozilla-thunderbird does not save drafts
John: I'm not even able to reproduce it at will using IMAP. This is one of those random bugs which decides on its own when it's going to happen. -- Mozilla-thunderbird does not save drafts https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/132350 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 231683] Re: Printer Dialogue doesn't work properly
I stumbled across the same problem, then I noticed that this feature has been moved to the Options tab (which is unfortunate, since I use this frequently, and the tab selection isn't sticky). Another puzzling thing is that in your screenshot you have "Markierung" where I have "Current" so something seems to have been lost in translation (my "Current" is greyed out, so I guess either that feature has also gone away, or by "Current" they really mean "Current Selection"). In any case, I'd say they were drinking too much beer when they decided to release this beta (and when it was decided to include a beta version of Firefox in the release version of Ubuntu). Don't get your hopes up now that you know where the feature lives now: it's badly broken (only prints the first line or so -- or sometimes nothing at all) as other bug reports document. -- Printer Dialogue doesn't work properly https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/231683 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 223357] Re: "print selection Only" does not work in firefox3
> Does this work in ffox 3 RC1? Chances could be improved of getting an answer to the question if (s)he is provided with instructions for how to test this without disturbing his/her package management system setup. I haven't had much luck in getting responses to my requests for such instructions in similar circumstances (otherwise I'd post the instructions myself). :-) -- "print selection Only" does not work in firefox3 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/223357 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 237612] [NEW] Heron freezing with latest kernel (2.6.24-18)
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: linux-image-2.6.24-18-generic I ran update manager yesterday on my main workstation running Ubuntu 8.04, which pulled in a new kernel, 2.6.24-18-generic. Then when I started up the system it didn't make it a minute before freezing solid: wouldn't accept keyboard or mouse input, couldn't ssh into the box, couldn't get to the console, nothing. Power cycling to restart (more than once) showed the problem to be very repeatable. Dropped back to 2.6.24-17-generic and the machine seems to be OK again. Linux ws 2.6.24-17-generic #1 SMP Thu May 1 14:31:33 UTC 2008 i686 GNU/Linux ** Affects: linux (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- Heron freezing with latest kernel (2.6.24-18) https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/237612 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 237612] Re: Heron freezing with latest kernel (2.6.24-18)
** Attachment added: "Output from lspci" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/15057753/lspci.txt -- Heron freezing with latest kernel (2.6.24-18) https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/237612 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 242369] Re: oobase wizard hangs on startup
Well, when I went to check I discovered that between 1:2.4.1-1ubuntu1 and 1:2.4.1-1ubuntu2 they fixed the problem. Too bad they didn't say anything here. So technically, you can close this bug. But it would still be nice to find out how to start oobase with command-line arguments which will instruct it to log what it's doing when it starts up. -- oobase wizard hangs on startup https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/242369 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 123307] Re: OpenOffice fails to open odbc table with compound primary key
No, it appears that the problem has been resolved. -- OpenOffice fails to open odbc table with compound primary key https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/123307 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 223357] Re: "print selection Only" does not work in firefox3
> working fine. Yes, confirmed with both of the last two repro cases given above. I'm puzzled that "65" reported that he/she still needs to use Wine to work around the bug. -- "print selection Only" does not work in firefox3 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/223357 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 242369] [NEW] oobase wizard hangs on startup
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: openoffice.org-base version of the package: 1:2.4.1-1ubuntu1 version of Ubuntu: 8.04, fully updated When I launch oobase directly (command-line or UI menus) a wizard is started up which just hangs forever. I can start oobase by double- clicking on an .odb file, or by specifying an .odb file on the command line, without encountering the problem. I've read the man page for oobase, but I don't see any mention of how to start oobase in such a way that it will log what it's doing, perhaps even providing some clues on what's going wrong. Is there really no such option? ** Affects: openoffice.org (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- oobase wizard hangs on startup https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/242369 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 223357] Re: "print selection Only" does not work in firefox3
In an earlier comment I reported: > RC-1 has been released, and the bug is fixed in that version. At this point the final release for Firefox 3.0 is in the default repositories for Ubuntu 8.04, and sad to say, the bug is back (perhaps in a worse form: see my previous comment). To reproduce: * install Ubuntu 8.04 * run sudo apt-get dist-upgrade * open Firefox * load https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/firefox-3.0/+bug/223357 (this page) * select the comment posted 2008-06-19 containing the substring "I'm not so sure." * pull down the File menu * choose Print * select the Options tab * check the box for "Print Selection Only" * click the Print button Expected result: printed page containing selected comment Actual result: printed page with headers and footers only This is a serious bug. It's not as bad as "sets the monitor on fire" but it's a real productivity killer. -- "print selection Only" does not work in firefox3 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/223357 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Re: [Bug 223357] Re: "print selection Only" does not work in firefox3
Daz wrote: > After the recent upgrade to FF3 the "Print Selection only" works perfectly > for me. So, as far as I am concerned the bug is now fixed. > I'm not so sure. I just brought up http://ubuntu.wordpress.com/ in FF3 (release), selected the first blog article (from the title "Installing Vista Fonts in Ubuntu" through the numbered list at the end of the article: "... easier to install fonts.") and tried printing the selection. Not only did Firefox not print all of the selection, much of what it did print got printed twice. So I guess I'd say we're moving backwards with selection printing. :-( -- Bob Kline http://www.rksystems.com mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -- "print selection Only" does not work in firefox3 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/223357 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 221304] Re: EnvyNG installs Ubuntu's lrm but it should install its own packages
Alberto: I tested the new version with the GeForce 7100 / NVIDIA nForce 630i as you requested, and the behavior is still the same as described in https://bugs.launchpad.net/envy/+bug/224004/comments/2 (using envyng to install the driver leaves the display in 800x600 resolution, even though if I run nVidia's installer directly the installed driver works correctly and I get the 1280x1024 resolution back again). I have to re- run the nVidia installer again periodically to keep up with Ubuntu kernel upgrades, so it would be nice to have the machine brought back into the Ubuntu/envy fold at some point. Bob -- EnvyNG installs Ubuntu's lrm but it should install its own packages https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/221304 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 179637] Re: powernowd causes firefox+flash to hang
Sorry, I gave up waiting for a response to the bug report and got rid of the machine on which I was experiencing the problem. I don't see how filing bug reports will do anything toward "helping to make Ubuntu better" if they're ignored. -- powernowd causes firefox+flash to hang https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/179637 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 237612] Re: Heron freezing with latest kernel (2.6.24-18)
Just to make this issue more intriguing, I thought I should note that in researching the problem I came across cases of three separate Ubuntu users whose system was hosed when they updated to 2.6.24-18-generic, and who reported that they solved the problem by (are you sitting down?) deleting the older kernel images! http://ubuntuforums.org/showthread.php?t=818241 http://ubuntuforums.org/showthread.php?t=818608 Now, I'm having a hard time understanding how just having the bytes for the images sitting there in the file system could possibly cause a computer to freeze up so consistently. At first I conjured up far- fetched theories like corrupted file systems with garbled cross links between the blocks for the image files. But as wildly improbable as that would be for a single case, the odds against that happening to three separate users are beyond astronomical. I should point out that for at least one (perhaps all) of these three cases the users got no better results with the solution I used, which was to just pick the older kernel from the grub menu, so I'm not really sure how much commonality there is between the bug(s) I ran into and their situations. I would be *very* interested in any light anyone can shed explaining (rationally, not "it's just voodoo") how the presence of older kernel images could possibly affect the behavior of the computer in any way. -- Heron freezing with latest kernel (2.6.24-18) https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/237612 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 237612] Re: Heron freezing with latest kernel (2.6.24-18)
> ... I came across cases of three separate Ubuntu users whose system was hosed ... Sorry, I should have written "... I came across cases of three separate Ubuntu users whose systems were hosed " They weren't all running the same computer. :-) -- Heron freezing with latest kernel (2.6.24-18) https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/237612 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Re: [Bug 223357] Re: "print selection Only" does not work in firefox3
John Vivirito wrote: > Bob Kline wrote: > >>> Does this work in ffox 3 RC1? >>> >> Chances could be improved of getting an answer to the question if (s)he >> is provided with instructions for how to test this without disturbing >> his/her package management system setup. I haven't had much luck in >> getting responses to my requests for such instructions in similar >> circumstances (otherwise I'd post the instructions myself). :-) >> >> > Can you please follow the instructions at the following link on how to > start witha clean profile and test it with Firefox RC1 with a new profile. > > https://wiki.ubuntu.com/MozillaTeam/Bugs > > Hi, John. Not sure whether you were directing this request to me or to Daz (or both), but in any case while the instructions to which you link appear to have plenty of useful information about juggling Firefox profiles, they don't address the issue to which I was referring. I've seen estimates that there are over 8 million Ubuntu users. I'd be surprised if as many as 8,000 of them (.1%) have a sufficiently thorough understanding of how the package management system works to know the answers to all of the following questions: 1. If someone asks me to install a package on my Ubuntu machine and it doesn't show up in Synaptic's list of available packages, what do I do? 2. If I need to manipulate the list of package sources, how do I know which ones to trust? 3. If I need to add sources for packages, how do the sources interact with each other? 4. What are the possible drawbacks to adding package sources? 5. If I remove sources, what happens to the packages I got from those sources? 6. What bad things can happen if I install software without going through the package management system? 7. What are all of the things I could do to cause the package management system to stop working correctly? 8. What do I do to fix the package management system if it stops working correctly? Surely the Ubuntu team wants to get bug feedback from a broader community than this elite subset of Ubuntu gurus. I'm definitely not in that group, but these are questions that cross my mind when I'm asked to try the latest beta of some program to see if the bugs are fixed, and I know I've got plenty of company. I've asked on more than one occasion for someone to direct me to documentation which addresses these questions comprehensively, and I'm inclined to think that such documentation doesn't exist, based on the lack of response. I'd be delighted to be proved wrong (even if that proof comes with some "it was right under your nose, silly" ridicule), and I'd be more than happy to use those instructions if they show me how to install Firefox 3RC1 safely so I can do the testing you ask for. (As an aside, I suspect that Daz didn't even realize you were asking him/her to test with a different version of Firefox than is available by default with 8.04, based on the mention of switching profiles without identifying the version of FF used for the test.) -- Bob Kline http://www.rksystems.com mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -- "print selection Only" does not work in firefox3 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/223357 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 237612] Re: Heron freezing with latest kernel (2.6.24-18)
An update on the reports of similar lockups with the latest kernel: one of the three users described above as having solved the problem by eliminating the older kernel images did some additional experimenting and reported the following sequence. First he re-installed 2.6.24-17 kernel image and headers and rebooted into that kernel. His system was hosed. Next he removed the kernel image for 2.6.24-18 and rebooted back into 2.6.24-17. System still didn't work. Then he removed the kernel headers for 2.6.24-18 and rebooted back into 2.6.24-17. System working perfectly. I post this information not because I understand how the presence of older header files could affect system behavior (I don't), but in the hopes that the maintainers who know more about the kernel and the package management system than I do will find useful clues in it. In contrast with the issue tracking systems used for the software I write myself, where the users of the software have adequate means for communicating the severity of a problem, it doesn't appear that I have any way of setting the "Importance" value for bugs that I file against Ubuntu. It seems like a broken kernel that freezes the whole system for a bunch of users would merit more urgent attention than (for example) cosmetic flaws. What can I as a mere mortal do differently when I file a bug report for a serious show-stopper like this in order to get the attention of those doing triage on the incoming reports? Thanks! -- Heron freezing with latest kernel (2.6.24-18) https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/237612 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 223357] Re: "print selection Only" does not work in firefox3
Daz: Sorry it didn't work out for you. In fairness to the Ubuntu maintainers, while it's not uncommon in the Linux world to be told "we'd like you to install and test this beta software that might mess up your system and confuse the package manager, and we're not going to tell you how to avoid the possible pitfalls" the Windows equivalent is "we'd like you to reformat your hard disk and re- install the operating system." Neither world is perfect. Good luck with Windows. Cheers, Bob -- "print selection Only" does not work in firefox3 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/223357 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 225130] Re: Cannot get back to a terminal after X has started
I've got the same problem under Ubuntu 8.10 (Ctrl+Alt+Fx results in a blank screen instead of a prompt in a console window). This bug was opened back in May, but it's still marked as "New"; what do we need to do to get a response? Or are we not supposed to use console windows any more in this new GUI world? -- Cannot get back to a terminal after X has started https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/225130 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 298126] Re: package samba-common 2:3.2.3-1ubuntu3 failed to install/upgrade:
Well, I give up. Apparently no one on the Ubuntu team views an upgrade process which scrambles users' computers to be a serious problem so I scrubbed the machine and did a fresh installation. Don't bother to post the normal "are you still having the problem you reported six months ago? can we close this bug?" questions. -- package samba-common 2:3.2.3-1ubuntu3 failed to install/upgrade: https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/298126 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 296937] Re: Firefox not rendering pages from Windows web server correctly
I'm sorry, but the machine on which this behavior occurs is my main production workstation, and I'm reluctant to upgrade it, given that the last time I tried to upgrade an Ubuntu system from 8.04 to 8.10 the upgrade process crashed, and the bug report filed with launchpad for this crash was ignored. In fact, this seems to be the standard pattern for most of the Ubuntu bugs I have taken the time to file. Nothing happens after I file a report until a long time has passed, at which point I get a message (possibly automated?) saying "there hasn't been any activity in [the reported issue] recently" and asking if I could do some more testing to find out if the bug has disappeared so it can be closed. I know this is not commercial software, but Ubuntu is the only widely-used open source software I have used for which taking the trouble to report bugs appears to be a waste of time. I'm sure some on the Ubuntu team are aware of the value of carefully prepared bug reports from the user community, but unfortunately that understanding isn't sufficiently widespread to make a difference that I can see. -- Firefox not rendering pages from Windows web server correctly https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/296937 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 309317] Re: 8.10 doesn't recognize wireless mouse
** Attachment added: "dmesg.log" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/20545779/dmesg.log -- 8.10 doesn't recognize wireless mouse https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/309317 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 309317] Re: 8.10 doesn't recognize wireless mouse
** Attachment added: "lspci-vnvn.log" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/20545789/lspci-vnvn.log -- 8.10 doesn't recognize wireless mouse https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/309317 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 309317] [NEW] 8.10 doesn't recognize wireless mouse
Public bug reported: I've got a Logitech V450 Laser Cordless Mouse which worked just fine under Hardy. I did a fresh install of 8.10 (never got any responses from the bug report I filed for the 8.04->8.10 upgrade failure, so I'm reluctant to upgrade on any other machines). Now Ubuntu doesn't recognize the mouse at all. This is a Compaq Presario V2670US notebook. Linux laptop 2.6.27-9-generic #1 SMP Thu Nov 20 22:15:32 UTC 2008 x86_64 GNU/Linux Ubuntu 2.6.27-9.19-generic ** Affects: linux (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- 8.10 doesn't recognize wireless mouse https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/309317 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 309317] Re: 8.10 doesn't recognize wireless mouse
** Attachment added: "lsusb-v.log" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/20547721/lsusb-v.log -- 8.10 doesn't recognize wireless mouse https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/309317 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 309317] Re: 8.10 doesn't recognize wireless mouse
It appears that the USB subsystem on the machine is dead, so of course the wireless mouse isn't detected. Let's just hope that the fact that the demise of the USB hardware and the installation of 8.10 happened at the same time was just a coincidence. -- 8.10 doesn't recognize wireless mouse https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/309317 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 220992] Re: Message filter ignoring front of Subject line
> Is this symptom still reproducible in 9.04 with TB 3.0? Apperently not. I don't suppose the folks who fix a bug (or pull in a fix from upstream) could let users who take the trouble to file bug reports know that the bug has been fixed by posting a comment in the bug report when the fix is available, could they? Or are these bug reports just a waste of time? The typical pattern for the Ubuntu reports I file is that I get no indication whatsoever for months that anyone is looking into the problem I've reported. Then I get a question asking if the problem still exists, accompanied by a flag which indicates that the bug will be automatically closed if I don't respond within XX days. These questions show such striking similarities to each other that I've begun to wonder if even they aren't automatically generated. For the software I develop myself, I consider feedback from my users to be one of my most valuable assets. I don't get the impression that this attitude is universally shared in the Ubuntu world. -- Message filter ignoring front of Subject line https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/220992 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Re: [Bug 223357] Re: "print selection Only" does not work in firefox3
Alexander Sack wrote: > Anyway, for me it works fine in firefox 3 RC2; i guess it works in > firefox 3 RC1 too. That version will be pushed out today most likely, > so try in a day or two after pulling all updates. > RC-1 has been released, and the bug is fixed in that version. What's the best forum for pursuing answers to the questions I posted earlier in this issue? I'd like to contribute to documentation (perhaps a FAQ) to which maintainers could refer when asking less experienced users to install and test versions of software packages which aren't available by default from the package manager. Of course, I'll need assistance finding out what some of the answers are myself first. :-) -- Bob Kline http://www.rksystems.com mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -- "print selection Only" does not work in firefox3 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/223357 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Re: [Bug 223357] [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Submit Request Failure]
On Wed, 2008-06-11 at 17:37 +, Alexander Sack wrote: > what questions do you have in particular in mind for the FAQ? All of the ones I listed in https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/firefox-3.0/+bug/223357/comments/8 -- Bob Kline http://www.rksystems.com mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -- "print selection Only" does not work in firefox3 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/223357 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Re: [Bug 223357] Re: "print selection Only" does not work in firefox3
John Vivirito wrote: > Try either Mozilla team mailing list if related to Ubuntu's version of > Mozilla or Mozilla upstream has a forum or you can try answers.launchpad.net > I believe if you look a little more closely at the questions you'll see that they aren't specific to Mozilla at all, but are applicable to all of Ubuntu. The answers.launchpad.net site looks promising, though; I'll give that a shot (if I can ever get http://answers.launchpad.net/ubuntu to respond -- it seems to be having a rough morning). Thanks. -- Bob Kline http://www.rksystems.com mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -- "print selection Only" does not work in firefox3 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/223357 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 267921] [NEW] xboard reports incorrect position information
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: xboard Unbuntu 8.04 xboard 4.2.7-7ubuntu2 To reproduce: (1) open xboard (2) select Edit Game from the Mode menu (3) paste the following sequence of moves using File / Paste Game: 1. e4 e5 2. Nf3 Nc6 3. Bb5 Nf6 4. O-O Nxe4 5. d4 Nd6 6. Bxc6 dxc6 7. dxe5 Nf5 8. Qxd8+ Kxd8 9. Nc3 Ke8 (4) select Copy Position from the File menu (5) view the contents of the clipboard: r1b1kb1r/ppp2ppp/2p5/4Pn2/8/2N2N2/PPP2PPP/R1B2RK1 w kq - 0 10 (6) note that the FEN indicates that black can still castle, which is not legal after the above sequence of moves ** Affects: xboard (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- xboard reports incorrect position information https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/267921 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 224004] Re: Envy doesn't recognize GeForce 7100 / NVIDIA nForce 630i
Upgraded the machine to Intrepid and the problem has been fixed; I no longer have to rebuild the proprietary driver by hand every time the kernel is upgraded. Thanks. -- Envy doesn't recognize GeForce 7100 / NVIDIA nForce 630i https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/224004 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 220992] [NEW] Message filter ignoring front of Subject line
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: thunderbird I have a filter which is supposed to look for the string "RSS sites downloaded" at the beginning of the Subject line and move any matching messages to a "reports" folder. This allows me to keep an archive of all of the automatically generated reports for a job which runs every night. Unfortunately, I just noticed that Thunderbird isn't just moving messages whose subject starts with the target substring, but is also silently moving messages which begin "Re: RSS sites downloaded"; so I've been missing messages from my customers who are trying to send me information about anomalies in the reports. Ubuntu 7.10 Thunderbird 2.0.0.12+nobinonly-0ubuntu0.7.10.0 What I expected to happen: The filter only processes message whose Subject starts with the string "RSS sites downloaded" What happened instead: The filter silently moved other messages to the separate folder. ProblemType: Bug Architecture: i386 Date: Wed Apr 23 08:16:15 2008 DistroRelease: Ubuntu 7.10 NonfreeKernelModules: nvidia Package: mozilla-thunderbird 2.0.0.12+nobinonly-0ubuntu0.7.10.0 PackageArchitecture: all SourcePackage: thunderbird Uname: Linux ws 2.6.22-14-generic #1 SMP Tue Feb 12 07:42:25 UTC 2008 i686 GNU/Linux ** Affects: thunderbird (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Tags: apport-bug -- Message filter ignoring front of Subject line https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/220992 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 220992] Re: Message filter ignoring front of Subject line
** Attachment added: "Dependencies.txt" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/13836933/Dependencies.txt -- Message filter ignoring front of Subject line https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/220992 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 224004] Re: Envy doesn't recognize GeForce 7100 / NVIDIA nForce 630i
I tried to test, but I guess I don't know enough about the Ubuntu repository thing. I went into synaptic and turned on hardy-proposed (and hit "Reload"), then removed and reinstalled envyng-gtk. Then I ran the NVIDIA...run script with the --uninstall option. Then I exited gdm and ran envyng -t and got the same error message (card not supported). I had assumed that with the hardy-proposed repository enabled the package manager would find and pick up the later version, but apparently this is a more subtle system than that. Any tips on what steps I left out? Also, I assume that after I've finished testing I'll want to disable hardy-proposed. Any gotchas I should look out for in that process? -- Envy doesn't recognize GeForce 7100 / NVIDIA nForce 630i https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/224004 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 224004] Re: Envy doesn't recognize GeForce 7100 / NVIDIA nForce 630i
OK, I'll watch the blog [1] and hold off until you give the word. Are the steps to test this as described in my previous comment correct? Or do I need to jump through some additional hoops to entice the package manager to get the latest version from hardy-proposed, instead of just the first matching repository it finds in /etc/apt/sources.list? I've browsed through https://help.ubuntu.com/community/Repositories but if this subtlety is covered there I missed it. If there's a better source I should be reading I'd be grateful for the link. [1] You're probably aware of the fact that Google brings up a link to a stale version of your blog at wordpress as its first hit, right? -- Envy doesn't recognize GeForce 7100 / NVIDIA nForce 630i https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/224004 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 173418] Re: [Hardy] NVIDIA cards using vesa driver and low screen resolutions on livecd
> Could you run 'lscpi -nn |grep VGA' and post the results. For nVidia GeForce 7100: 00:10.0 VGA compatible controller [0300]: nVidia Corporation Unknown device [10de:07e1] (rev a2) I, too, was able to use Avery's workaround, but I would be happier to have a solution which didn't leave me with a video configuration outside the control of the package manager. In addition to that drawback, I now have a Ununtu login screen which doesn't know what the machine's resolution is, and as a result the username/password box is pushed way down to the lower right portion of the screen instead of the center where it's supposed to be, and the session configuration widgets aren't visible at all. Anyone know a fix for that side effect? Finally, what's the process for getting a card into the database for PCI IDs? The 7100 has been around for a while. -- [Hardy] NVIDIA cards using vesa driver and low screen resolutions on livecd https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/173418 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 173418] Re: [Hardy] NVIDIA cards using vesa driver and low screen resolutions on livecd
> ... what's the process for getting a card into the database for PCI IDs? I see that it's already in the upstream database, and I found the update-pciids command. I also did some research and found that gdm decides what the screen resolution is be reading the first mode in the Display section of xorg.conf, and was able to fix the problem with the login screen by adjusting the order of the modes in that section so that gdm uses the correct resolution for the login screen. So now if I could just find a way to get out of low resolution land without jumping outside the package manager's realm, life with Ubuntu would be perfect. :-) -- [Hardy] NVIDIA cards using vesa driver and low screen resolutions on livecd https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/173418 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 224004] Re: Envy doesn't recognize GeForce 7100 / NVIDIA nForce 630i
OK, thanks. Here's a patch for the 7100, which I can confirm works with 169.12. ** Attachment added: "Adds entry for 07e1" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/14012854/idcardlist.py.diff -- Envy doesn't recognize GeForce 7100 / NVIDIA nForce 630i https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/224004 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 224004] Re: Envy doesn't recognize GeForce 7100 / NVIDIA nForce 630i
You're most welcome; and thanks for the very useful tool. -- Envy doesn't recognize GeForce 7100 / NVIDIA nForce 630i https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/224004 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 72262] Re: Form Wizard in Base does not complete
> ... it does not seem like there will be a fix in feisty ... If that's true, what did Matt Vickers mean when he wrote back in June: "will request backport or stable release upgrade"? -- Form Wizard in Base does not complete https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/72262 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 72262] Re: Form Wizard in Base does not complete
Who is the Ubuntu package maintainer for OOo (bringing up the Ubuntu home page and doing a search on "package maintainers" didn't provide anything useful)? If you let me have his/her email address I'll provide a nudge. Cheers, Bob -- Form Wizard in Base does not complete https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/72262 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 72262] Re: Form Wizard in Base does not complete
Steffen: I'm sure my knowledge of the Debian package internals is woefully inadequate compared with yours. I imagine that's probably true for most Ubuntu users, given the target audience for the distribution. I do know, however, that the bug fix in the version of Ubuntu which hasn't been released works with the free Java implementation. It would never have occurred to me that requesting a stable release upgrade would be seen as "complaining." Regards, Bob -- Form Wizard in Base does not complete https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/72262 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 131399] Re: %sudo ALL=NOPASSWD: ALL seems to have no effect in sudoers
It looks like sudo also ignores the instruction to allow a single account the ability to execute specific commands without supplying the account's password. For example: bkline localhost = NOPASSWD: /usr/local/bin/do-start-vpn, \ /usr/sbin/vpnc-disconnect This works in any other distribution of Linux. Is this the same bug? -- %sudo ALL=NOPASSWD: ALL seems to have no effect in sudoers https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/131399 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 157777] Re: gutsy amd64 freeze crash lockup
> It seems Ubuntu 32 bit has not the same "freeze crash lockup" problem. I wish that were true. I tried switching to the 32-bit Gutsy on my AMD64 and Firefox still froze pretty regularly. I was able to make the freezes go away by ripping out Flash support, which isn't an acceptable solution, as it makes some sites unusable. My most recent attempt at a solution involves disabling powernowd. After that modification I've been able to use Flash without Firefox freezing up, but I haven't been running this way long enough to declare success. Linux ws 2.6.22-14-generic #1 SMP Tue Dec 18 08:02:57 UTC 2007 i686 GNU/Linux 1.5 GB RAM AMD Athlon(tm) 64 Processor 2800+ -- gutsy amd64 freeze crash lockup https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/15 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 123307] Re: OpenOffice fails to open odbc table with compound primary key
Haven't been able to schedule the upgrade yet (downloaded it the first day of release but this time of year gets too hectic). Thanks for the nudge -- I'll try to fit it in during the next week and let you know. -- OpenOffice fails to open odbc table with compound primary key https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/123307 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 123307] Re: OpenOffice fails to open odbc table with compound primary key
The bug is still present on Ubuntu 7.10 OpenOffice 2.3.0. -- OpenOffice fails to open odbc table with compound primary key https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/123307 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 179637] powernowd causes firefox+flash to hang
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: powernowd Ever since upgrading to Gutsy, I have experienced regular lockups of Firefox whenever visiting a site with Flash components. The only way I was able to avoid the problem was to rip out Flash support (not acceptable) or rip out powernowd. $ uname -a Linux ws 2.6.22-14-generic #1 SMP Tue Dec 18 08:02:57 UTC 2007 i686 GNU/Linux AMD Athlon(tm) 64 Processor 2800+ 1.5 GB RAM ** Affects: powernowd (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- powernowd causes firefox+flash to hang https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/179637 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 179637] Re: powernowd causes firefox+flash to hang
I'll be happy to provide any other information you need. ** Attachment added: "$ sudo dmidecode > dmi.txt" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/11107367/dmi.txt -- powernowd causes firefox+flash to hang https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/179637 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 126413] Re: Odbc Mysql Openoffice
This bug makes MySQL useless in OpenOffice on Ubuntu. Do you need assistance with testing the available upstream fix to the problem? Anything else we can help with to get this moving? -- Odbc Mysql Openoffice https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/126413 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 123307] Re: OpenOffice fails to open odbc table with compound primary key
I'm afraid not. -- OpenOffice fails to open odbc table with compound primary key https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/123307 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 123307] Re: OpenOffice fails to open odbc table with compound primary key
Just out of curiosity, I notice that this issue is marked with a status of "Incomplete"; can you tell me what information you still need from me? -- OpenOffice fails to open odbc table with compound primary key https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/123307 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 126413] Re: Odbc Mysql Openoffice
Is there a problem with getting this fixed? If it's just getting the later version of the upstream package, why not just do it? -- Odbc Mysql Openoffice https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/126413 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 193997] [NEW] Can't put hyperlink in cells
Public bug reported: There is no way to put a hyperlink in a spreadsheet cell using pyExcelerator. version 0.6.3a-1 on Ubuntu 7.10. ** Affects: pyexcelerator (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- Can't put hyperlink in cells https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/193997 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 198829] Re: Sent folder moved
** Attachment added: "Dependencies.txt" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/12441978/Dependencies.txt -- Sent folder moved https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/198829 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 198829] [NEW] Sent folder moved
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: thunderbird With the most recent upgrade to the thunderbird package (2.0.0.12 +nobinonly-0ubuntu0.7.10.0) on gutsy, all of a sudden the Sent folder for my IMAP account was moved from up at the top to near the bottom of the folders, which means I have to scroll a couple of screens up and down to switch between the Inbox and Sent folders, a real PITA. I've searched for a way to undo this, but no luck. Why was it moved, and how do I get it back where it's supposed to be? This problem is not present on a Windows machine running the same version of Thunderbird. ProblemType: Bug Architecture: i386 Date: Wed Mar 5 12:43:08 2008 DistroRelease: Ubuntu 7.10 NonfreeKernelModules: nvidia Package: mozilla-thunderbird 2.0.0.12+nobinonly-0ubuntu0.7.10.0 PackageArchitecture: all SourcePackage: thunderbird Uname: Linux ws 2.6.22-14-generic #1 SMP Tue Feb 12 07:42:25 UTC 2008 i686 GNU/Linux ** Affects: thunderbird (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Tags: apport-bug -- Sent folder moved https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/198829 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 123307] OpenOffice fails to open odbc table with compound primary key
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: openoffice.org-base I just installed the latest Ubuntu on a system which used to have SuSE 10.1 on it, and which was able to use OpenOffice to connect to all of my business database tables. The database server is MySQL 5.0.32. I can open all of my tables except one, and when I try to open that table, I get the error message: "The data content could not be loaded ... [unixODBC][Driver Manager]Invalid cursor state." Sometimes (but not every time) OO.org crashes after the error dialog is dismissed. The table has a primary key (compound, with three columns). The bug I found which was closest to this bug does not appear to be the same problem, as the filer of that bug says that his problem goes away when he switches from the 64-bit version to the 32-bit version, and I'm running 32-bit versions of everything on this machine. I've been using these tables for almost a decade now, and the structure hasn't changed since the tables were created. This worked fine under SuSE (and still does on another machine I just upgraded to SuSE 10.2), and it worked fine before that when the client machine was running Fedora. To reproduce: * Install the latest Ubuntu i386 * Add mysql, unixodbc and libmyodbc packages * Create a mysql database * Create the following table: CREATE TABLE ubuntu_repro (a DATE NOT NULL, b DECIMAL(8, 2) NOT NULL, c VARCHAR(50) NOT NULL, CONSTRAINT repro_pk PRIMARY KEY (a, b, c)); * Create a DSN in odbc.ini for connecting to the database * Open OO.o base * Connect to the database via ODBC * Try to open the table Relevant version numbers: openoffice.org-base 2.2.0-1ubuntu3 libmyodbc 3.51.11-6 unixodbc 2.2.11-13 Any other version number (or any other information) needed? ** Affects: openoffice.org (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- OpenOffice fails to open odbc table with compound primary key https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/123307 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 30483] Re: oobase2 - Form wizard does not work
Sorry to ask a question for which the answer may be obvious to most of you, but I see that this bug is marked "fix released" and "Completed 2006-03-09"; this is the end of June 2007 and the bug is still present in the latest Ubuntu/OOo. What does "fix released" mean in this context? Thanks! -- oobase2 - Form wizard does not work https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/30483 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is a direct subscriber. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 123307] Re: OpenOffice fails to open odbc table with compound primary key
** Description changed: Binary package hint: openoffice.org-base I just installed the latest Ubuntu on a system which used to have SuSE 10.1 on it, and which was able to use OpenOffice to connect to all of my business database tables. The database server is MySQL 5.0.32. I can open all of my tables except one, and when I try to open that table, I get the error message: "The data content could not be loaded ... [unixODBC][Driver Manager]Invalid cursor state." Sometimes (but not every time) OO.org crashes after the error dialog is dismissed. The table has a primary key (compound, with three columns). The bug I found which was closest to this bug does not appear to be the same problem, as the filer of that bug says that his problem goes away when he switches from the 64-bit version to the 32-bit version, and I'm running 32-bit versions of everything on this machine. I've been using these tables for almost a decade now, and the structure hasn't changed since the tables were created. This worked fine under SuSE (and still does on another machine I just upgraded to SuSE 10.2), and it worked fine before that when the client machine was running Fedora. To reproduce: - * Install the latest Ubuntu i386 + * Install the latest Ubuntu i386 release (Feisty) * Add mysql, unixodbc and libmyodbc packages * Create a mysql database * Create the following table: CREATE TABLE ubuntu_repro (a DATE NOT NULL, b DECIMAL(8, 2) NOT NULL, c VARCHAR(50) NOT NULL, CONSTRAINT repro_pk PRIMARY KEY (a, b, c)); * Create a DSN in odbc.ini for connecting to the database * Open OO.o base * Connect to the database via ODBC * Try to open the table Relevant version numbers: openoffice.org-base 2.2.0-1ubuntu3 libmyodbc 3.51.11-6 unixodbc 2.2.11-13 Any other version number (or any other information) needed? -- OpenOffice fails to open odbc table with compound primary key https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/123307 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 72262] Re: Form Wizard in Base does not complete
Yet another workaround: I have found that copying the .odb file to a SuSE system, creating the form there, then copying back to the Ubuntu computer seems to work. Yes, it's a workaround with limited applicability (you have to have another computer available running a distribution of Linux on which OOo isn't broken), but until this bug gets fixed on Ubuntu, we have to take what we can get. Haven't tested on a Windows OOo. -- Form Wizard in Base does not complete https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/72262 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 296937] Re: Firefox not rendering pages from Windows web server correctly
> The correct status in this instance is Invalid, > as we do not know what fixed the problem, > ... feel free to report any other bugs you find > in Ubuntu ... I guess I don't understand how having our valid bug reports flagged as invalid is supposed to make us feel like filing more bug reports. I looked up the definition [1] for the "Invalid" bug status, and what I found was "Invalid: the report describes the software's normal behaviour, or is unsuitable for any other reason." I assume you didn't mean that failure to display some of the borders between cells was the "software's normal behaviour" (since you referred to the behavior as a "problem" yourself), so that would leave the conclusion that it is unsuitable for users to file bug reports if the developer who fixes the bug is going to fail to record the steps taken to correct the behavior. That assumes a level of clairvoyance most users haven't yet achieved. [1] https://help.launchpad.net/Bugs/Statuses -- Firefox not rendering pages from Windows web server correctly https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/296937 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 296937] Re: Firefox not rendering pages from Windows web server correctly
It appears that the Mozilla team has fixed the bug. I kind of miss the days when the developers would actually report back to the tracking system when they fixed a bug users had taken time to report (rather than relying on an annual sweep of issues which have had no activity because the users gave up), but I'm still grateful that they at least fixed the bug. Of course, I can't be certain that the bug is fixed, because I'm no longer running this workstation on the same hardware I was using when I ran into the symptoms, but presumably the developers were able to reproduce and eliminate the problems themselves, based on the information I provided initially. -- Firefox not rendering pages from Windows web server correctly https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/296937 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 220992] Re: Message filter ignoring front of Subject line
> Did you have message threading enabled when the mails were being filtered to the wrong folder? If the Ubuntu team seriously wants answers to questions like this they're going to have to ask them sooner than 19 months after the original problem report. -- Message filter ignoring front of Subject line https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/220992 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 220992] Re: Message filter ignoring front of Subject line
Based on which evidence is this report marked as "invalid"? -- Message filter ignoring front of Subject line https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/220992 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1213933] [NEW] Slideshow recommends trying out environment which isn't present
Public bug reported: Installing from a DVD (Xubuntu 13.04 64-bit in this case) offers two buttons: one to try running the OS from the DVD, and the other to install the OS directly. One of the panels which is displayed during the installation process suggests experimenting with the live environment while the installation is taking place. This panel is displayed regardless of whether the installation was launched from within the live environment or with the button to skip directly to the installation (in which case there isn't anything to experiment with during the installation). It would give new users a more confident feeling about the system they're installing if their first impression didn't make it look like the folks who created the installation program weren't paying attention. :-) ** Affects: xboard (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1213933 Title: Slideshow recommends trying out environment which isn't present To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/xboard/+bug/1213933/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 998573] Re: xfdesktop displays permanent instructions not to remove ejected media
Perfect! Had to log out and back in for the removal of notify-osd to take effect, and then the notification to wait for flushing to the device to complete disappeared when it was safe to remove it. I did some digging to find out how to replace notify-osd with xfce4-notifyd and found a post [1] that said that installing xfce4-notifyd will "remove notify-osd (as they cannot co-exist) and the ubuntu-desktop metapackage." However, when I tried to install xfce4-notifyd I was told that it was already installed, so I just did an apt-get remove notify- osd. So many things about Ubuntu that I don't understand. :-) Thanks for your help! [1] http://askubuntu.com/questions/49796/replace-notifyosd-with-the- xfce-version -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/998573 Title: xfdesktop displays permanent instructions not to remove ejected media To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/xfdesktop4/+bug/998573/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 998573] [NEW] xfdesktop displays permanent instructions not to remove ejected media
Public bug reported: When I right-click a desktop icon for a removable media device and select eject, xfdesktop display a dialog message which says "Writing data to device. There is data that needs to be written to the device [device-label] before it can be removed. Please do not remove the media or disconnect the drive." This message is never updated to indicate that the flush activity has completed and that the device can be removed (I once waited several days to see if it would eventually change). It can't possibly take that long to flush the data to a thumb drive. The only remotely related bug report I found was a "wont fix" for a complaint that the message was too verbose. I don't care how long the message is; I just want to be told when it's safe to remove the device. Release of Ubuntu: 12.04 LTS Version of xfdesktop4: 4.8.3-2ubuntu7 What I expected to happen: to be told when I can remove the media What happened instead: I was told permanently not to remove the media ** Affects: xfdesktop4 (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/998573 Title: xfdesktop displays permanent instructions not to remove ejected media To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/xfdesktop4/+bug/998573/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 790450] Re: 'Submitting now...' spinner runs forever on usefulness submit fails
Looks like we have a regression, because this bug is back in trusty (14.04). I've waited several hours for the "Submitting now ..." spinner to stop (see attached screen shot) and I'm not hopeful. :-) Unfortunately, the interface for changing the status of this issue appears to be broken or disabled. ** Attachment added: "USC stuck" https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/software-center/+bug/790450/+attachment/4166038/+files/Screenshot%20-%2007302014%20-%2002%3A56%3A42%20PM.png -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/790450 Title: 'Submitting now...' spinner runs forever on usefulness submit fails To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/software-center/+bug/790450/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 790450] Re: 'Submitting now...' spinner runs forever on usefulness submit fails
Killing the python submit usefulness scripts didn't do the trick. It really was a zombie, which I had to kill using sudo. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/790450 Title: 'Submitting now...' spinner runs forever on usefulness submit fails To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/software-center/+bug/790450/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 790450] Re: 'Submitting now...' spinner runs forever on usefulness submit fails
Even that didn't work. I'm going to have to reboot the system, as this USC image still keeps popping up. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/790450 Title: 'Submitting now...' spinner runs forever on usefulness submit fails To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/software-center/+bug/790450/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 790450] Re: 'Submitting now...' spinner runs forever on usefulness submit fails
It's worse than I thought. I finally gave up and closed down Ubuntu Software Center, or at least I thought I did, but every minute or so it reappeared, obscuring the windows for the foreground apps I was working in. I did some more digging, and found this using ps: 6131 ?Sl 0:00 /usr/bin/python /usr/share/software-center/submit_usefulness_gtk3.py --review-id 85959 --is-useful 1 --parent-xid --datadir /usr/share/software-center/ 6142 ?Sl 0:00 /usr/bin/python /usr/share/software-center/submit_usefulness_gtk3.py --review-id 89278 --is-useful 1 --parent-xid --datadir /usr/share/software-center/ So apparently the script to submit the feedback is hanging and making a zombie out of USC (not a zombie in the sense we use that term in the UNIX world, but the image for the USC window isn't going away until I kill those two processes, so that's what I'm going to do. Since I can't re-open this ticket, am I going to have to file a new bug report? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/790450 Title: 'Submitting now...' spinner runs forever on usefulness submit fails To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/software-center/+bug/790450/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 790450] Re: 'Submitting now...' spinner runs forever on usefulness submit fails
Reboot wasn't necessary. I was able to launch USC from the applications menu and then close it again, and it appears to have cleaned up after itself this time (at least I haven't seen the phantom image since then, and during the time which has elapsed I would have seen it multiple times, so I've got my fingers crossed). -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/790450 Title: 'Submitting now...' spinner runs forever on usefulness submit fails To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/software-center/+bug/790450/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 132350] Re: Mozilla-thunderbird does not save drafts
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 966428 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/966428 Just out of curiosity, how did this bug, which was filed over a half- dozen years ago, get marked as a duplicate of a bug filed last year? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/132350 Title: Mozilla-thunderbird does not save drafts To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/mozilla-thunderbird/+bug/132350/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1237562] [NEW] Software updater broken
Public bug reported: I rebooted my Xubuntu 13.04 laptop after a set of updates. When the machine came back up, the update icon was back in the tray, saying "There are 11 updates available." So I clicked on "Show updates" at which a dialog window came up and said "The software on this computer is up to date." So, thinking the tray icon needed to catch up, and that it would do so after I dismissed the dialog window, I clicked OK. But the tray icon remained, still insisting that there are 11 updates to be installed. So I clicked on "Show updates" again and got the same dialog window saying the computer is up to date. After repeating this cycle several more times, I began to wonder if the repository is in a confused state, and sending out faulty information. Since I first noticed the problem, I have observed that the problem affects all my Xubuntu systems, and the problem has persisted for several weeks, so I assume that it's not the repositories which are confused, but the software update manager. ** Affects: update-manager (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1237562 Title: Software updater broken To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/update-manager/+bug/1237562/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1237562] Re: Software updater broken
$ /usr/lib/update-notifier/apt-check -p gpgv libsasl2-2 libsasl2-modules -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1237562 Title: Software updater broken To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/update-manager/+bug/1237562/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1237562] Re: Software updater broken
There was one more line of output that I missed, because it wasn't terminated by a newline: gpgv libsasl2-2 libsasl2-modules gnupg -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1237562 Title: Software updater broken To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/update-manager/+bug/1237562/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1237562] Re: Software updater broken
I'm working around the problem by opening up a console window and running sudo apt-get update sudo apt-get upgrade but that's getting old. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1237562 Title: Software updater broken To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/update-manager/+bug/1237562/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Re: [Bug 441835] Re: Clicking on floppy gives "no device media found"
Is all this spam really necessary? On Sat, Jun 9, 2012 at 5:30 PM, Ubuntu QA Website <441...@bugs.launchpad.net> wrote: > This bug has been reported on the Ubuntu ISO testing tracker. > > A list of all reports related to this bug can be found here: > http://iso.qa.ubuntu.com/qatracker/reports/bugs/441835 > > -- > You received this bug notification because you are subscribed to the bug > report. > https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/441835 > > Title: > Clicking on floppy gives "no device media found" > > To manage notifications about this bug go to: > https://bugs.launchpad.net/devicekit/+bug/441835/+subscriptions -- Bob Kline http://www.rksystems.com mailto:bkl...@rksystems.com -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/441835 Title: Clicking on floppy gives "no device media found" To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/devicekit/+bug/441835/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 224004] Re: Envy doesn't recognize GeForce 7100 / NVIDIA nForce 630i
"Invalid" seems a puzzling status for a bug that was fixed years ago. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/224004 Title: Envy doesn't recognize GeForce 7100 / NVIDIA nForce 630i To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/envy/+bug/224004/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Re: [Bug 998573] Re: xfdesktop displays permanent instructions not to remove ejected media
Right, it never goes away. However, what you're calling a "bubble" is actually a dialog window. The name "bubble" brings to mind the picture of something less substantial than a full-blow dialog box. More along the lines of a hovering shape with rounded corners, a little bit of text, no widgets, perhaps less than complete opacity, and no user interaction required for it to disappear. Makes me wonder if we're seeing the same thing. On Wed, May 16, 2012 at 10:16 AM, Lionel Le Folgoc wrote: > Nevermind, I checked what xfdesktop4 does: when it's safe to remove the > device, it doesn't display a message, only ask for the notification > bubble to be closed. I guess it doesn't work for you (i.e. the bubble > never disappear)? > > ** Changed in: xfdesktop4 (Ubuntu) > Status: Incomplete => Triaged > > -- > You received this bug notification because you are subscribed to the bug > report. > https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/998573 > > Title: > xfdesktop displays permanent instructions not to remove ejected media > > To manage notifications about this bug go to: > https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/xfdesktop4/+bug/998573/+subscriptions -- Bob Kline http://www.rksystems.com mailto:bkl...@rksystems.com -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/998573 Title: xfdesktop displays permanent instructions not to remove ejected media To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/xfdesktop4/+bug/998573/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 998573] Re: xfdesktop displays permanent instructions not to remove ejected media
No, this is what I see (attachment). Note "xfdesktop" in the title bar. ** Attachment added: "Message which is never updated." https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/xfdesktop4/+bug/998573/+attachment/3149539/+files/Screenshot%20-%2005162012%20-%2003%3A04%3A40%20PM.png -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/998573 Title: xfdesktop displays permanent instructions not to remove ejected media To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/xfdesktop4/+bug/998573/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 998573] Re: xfdesktop displays permanent instructions not to remove ejected media
Thanks, Lionel. When you say "you should probably use notify-osd only with Unity only" do you mean I need to switch to a different desktop manager, or are you suggesting that I replace notify-osd with some other comparable package that plays better with xfdesktop? I'm not 100% how the pieces fit together. I gather I've somehow inadvertently installed some incompatible components. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/998573 Title: xfdesktop displays permanent instructions not to remove ejected media To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/xfdesktop4/+bug/998573/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 998573] Re: xfdesktop displays permanent instructions not to remove ejected media
Thanks, Lionel. I'll dig around and see what I need to do to replace notify-osd with xfce4-notifyd without breaking anything further. :-) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/998573 Title: xfdesktop displays permanent instructions not to remove ejected media To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/xfdesktop4/+bug/998573/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 223357] Re: "print selection Only" does not work in firefox3
> Does this error still occur ...? Not as described in the original report, which said that only one full line and portions of two additional lines were printed, but the behavior is still not correct in 12.04 LTS / Firefox 17.0. I followed my own repro instructions in comment #21, and the output omitted all but a couple of pixels' height at the bottom of the top line (the line which says "Daz wrote:" which was included in the selection), but printed the rest of the lines intact; see the attached image of the print output, showing that the top line is almost completely chopped off. This would be a regression, as several of us posted comments quite some time ago confirming that the bug had been fixed. ** Attachment added: "Scan of print output" https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/firefox-3.0/+bug/223357/+attachment/3447971/+files/ubuntu-bug-223357.jpg -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/223357 Title: "print selection Only" does not work in firefox3 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/firefox-3.0/+bug/223357/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 615215] Re: Floppy stops working after kernel update (lucid)
Why was the status left at 'incomplete' after Paul supplied all of the requested information? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/615215 Title: Floppy stops working after kernel update (lucid) -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 615215] Re: Floppy usable in 10.04 until update
Same problem on 64-bit version of Ubuntu 10.4 with 2.6.32-24 kernel. -- Floppy usable in 10.04 until update https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/615215 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 538499] Re: warning spam on stdout: CRITICAL **: murrine_style_draw_box_gap: assertion `height >= -1' failed
Unfortunately Alf's workaround is temporary, as Update Manager wipes out the fix from time to time. -- warning spam on stdout: CRITICAL **: murrine_style_draw_box_gap: assertion `height >= -1' failed https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/538499 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Re: [Bug 441835] Re: Clicking on floppy gives "no device media found"
On 8/31/2010 2:01 PM, Martin Pitt wrote: > it'll be very hard to try and fit an IDE floppy > disk into a laptop :-), so at most this could be an USB drive; no idea > whether these are broken as well. Yep, same problem as with IDE floppy drives. -- Bob Kline http://www.rksystems.com mailto:bkl...@rksystems.com -- Clicking on floppy gives "no device media found" https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/441835 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
