[Bug 1900851] Re: [SRU] Cannot Create Port with Fixed IP Address

2021-08-20 Thread Mateusz Pawlowski
@hopem is there any ETA when 18.3.4 will be available for Ussuri?

Thanks

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1900851

Title:
  [SRU] Cannot Create Port with Fixed IP Address

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/cloud-archive/+bug/1900851/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1940332] Re: hci0: Failed to send firmware data (-38)

2021-08-20 Thread Kai-Heng Feng
Can you please ask the user to try
https://git.kernel.org/torvalds/c/0ea53674d07fb6db2dd7a7ec2fdc85a12eb246c2?

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1940332

Title:
  hci0: Failed to send firmware data (-38)

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/1940332/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1940332] Re: hci0: Failed to send firmware data (-38)

2021-08-20 Thread Kai-Heng Feng
Is it a regression?

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1940332

Title:
  hci0: Failed to send firmware data (-38)

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/1940332/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1913421] Re: Load of pre-upgrade qemu modules needs to avoid noexec

2021-08-20 Thread Christian Ehrhardt 
With this going into Impish and that now being in feature freeze without
any panic-bugs on this for a while I've started to backport the mount
unit, and established a test plan which is around this.

(most reasonable in monospace)

  Bionic FocalHirsuteImpish
installs fine
status after install
removes fine
status after remove
reinstalls fine
status after reinstall
upgrades fine
status after upgrade
purges fine
status after purge
---
Load old modules


Let me know if there is more to pre-check in your opinion.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1913421

Title:
  Load of pre-upgrade qemu modules needs to avoid noexec

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/qemu/+bug/1913421/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1913421] Re: Load of pre-upgrade qemu modules needs to avoid noexec

2021-08-20 Thread Christian Ehrhardt 
Oh and yes, thinking about it more time while backporting I think having
the mount unit default enabled (and therefore the post upgrade module
loads working by default) is the right way to go. So ddstreet and I
agree on this.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1913421

Title:
  Load of pre-upgrade qemu modules needs to avoid noexec

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/qemu/+bug/1913421/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1940626] [NEW] Evolution crashes when link clicked in email

2021-08-20 Thread pramathesh ambasta
Public bug reported:

I clicked on an external link in an email I received which caused
Evolution to crash repeatedly.

The source of the message is pasted below (thought this is not the only
message which has caused a crash of late):

*

Delivered-To: X
Received: by 2002:a6b:3113:0:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id j19csp220317ioa;
Thu, 19 Aug 2021 04:39:22 -0700 (PDT)
X-Google-Smtp-Source:
 ABdhPJzgLgcv5gEqbWL2GMEx6G1PDSNirV/3yN45X6Sw32bn1p3zhV6izDuyD6RD7DpOQtTge6+I
X-Received: by 2002:ae9:ebd5:: with SMTP id
 b204mr3093365qkg.83.1629373162528; Thu, 19 Aug 2021 04:39:22 -0700 (PDT)
ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1629373162; cv=none; d=google.com;
 s=arc-20160816;
 b=SC0DQdMAe8XAi9RVxeAmdPb3CIhosW+RUiwAEtyCmgKyOj/Elfz2fd6Vbc51jRACOR
 Hfu5i8fqfIMf98+YtkFVfNznDiae5KTJq2IpTAxo/fqFff+By0E1A3CdyYQJCfPZBc/b
 ARsRvHFyhx7w57hCTnqoUwRCIOmLiLIIBBTNapov4RBPA9lVJiCSnEUZyk03KPADMifW
 eyRNa5hHVU1dqyfpRQQcoyBKtMyzJcBhm1fXuZmuVMOP9bpxT6dbfZHEGhkMe3RUP8Oz
 KRv50WrntC8QPwaM0S57LLcwm6QlDt9vSIv3or629l41jw9ngmNna4d5uSYB/V0IbLo8 lavg==
ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com;
 s=arc-20160816; h=feedback-id:date:mime-version:subject:message-id:to:from
 :dkim-signature:dkim-signature;
 bh=R6nP0LwjM408E4QT/ybkKy1RC02IooGEbZgTPiekA8Q=;
 b=FZsBSAVRMFR6IdDOvigqQq+HV41lC72NdQtP6CfJQBeC7U9qWaXdcQiQJfF7re/vLw
 mM/ZUjxxacf78C6nsNYgv0lnYXVXYsd88h/tp94VgOqD37jIsNH+4eVFuPHgmuBm/kNR
 2diPrvjIY1EFdLTgSLwoDf4MdfJUnsaSYUbAXZOZTXT5Vkp27SlKn6J978ebkMMuLpHc
 1kl+ozwy5YTQTpUycTlmThyLjA+mwmxfqqoVPiXnxF+feYADDfEKmWFPtol4C4SPtDNh
 2WKmC/CKqh2KIuwPk5PMJw/RLRvo4bcuAF4uMFI7Kd42FrTKrs9k11/hBDCNcAdWRuJ+ 43yA==
ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; dkim=pass
 header.i=@canva.com header.s=yslv66d5hqaec6ap6sspekyvkyghnfhm
 header.b="c+kn/qwJ"; dkim=pass header.i=@amazonses.com
 header.s=ug7nbtf4gccmlpwj322ax3p6ow6yfsug header.b="HNP6AEn/"; spf=pass
 (google.com: domain of
 0100017b5e35603f-a4c29e51-d911-45b2-a438-352be84e3e8c-000...@amazonses.com
 designates 54.240.68.119 as permitted sender)
 
smtp.mailfrom=0100017b5e35603f-a4c29e51-d911-45b2-a438-352be84e3e8c-000...@amazonses.com;
 dmarc=pass (p=REJECT sp=REJECT dis=NONE) header.from=canva.com
Return-Path:
 <0100017b5e35603f-a4c29e51-d911-45b2-a438-352be84e3e8c-000...@amazonses.com>
Received: from a68-119.smtp-out.amazonses.com
 (a68-119.smtp-out.amazonses.com. [54.240.68.119]) by mx.google.com with
 ESMTPS id bi8si2220090qkb.299.2021.08.19.04.39.22 for 
 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-ECDSA-AES128-SHA bits=128/128); Thu, 19 Aug
 2021 04:39:22 -0700 (PDT)
Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of
 0100017b5e35603f-a4c29e51-d911-45b2-a438-352be84e3e8c-000...@amazonses.com
 designates 54.240.68.119 as permitted sender) client-ip=54.240.68.119;
Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@canva.com
 header.s=yslv66d5hqaec6ap6sspekyvkyghnfhm header.b="c+kn/qwJ"; dkim=pass
 header.i=@amazonses.com header.s=ug7nbtf4gccmlpwj322ax3p6ow6yfsug
 header.b="HNP6AEn/"; spf=pass (google.com: domain of
 0100017b5e35603f-a4c29e51-d911-45b2-a438-352be84e3e8c-000...@amazonses.com
 designates 54.240.68.119 as permitted sender)
 
smtp.mailfrom=0100017b5e35603f-a4c29e51-d911-45b2-a438-352be84e3e8c-000...@amazonses.com;
 dmarc=pass (p=REJECT sp=REJECT dis=NONE) header.from=canva.com
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/simple;
s=yslv66d5hqaec6ap6sspekyvkyghnfhm; d=canva.com; t=1629373162;
h=From:To:Message-ID:Subject:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Date;
bh=GZk7TTBUfvA2IQp+IyJJDZK3Ji/PcD3HuG2b+jvn2hs=;
b=c+kn/qwJ+Q5OUbS1UxXTQ+5gtyPrp1mfYQvjOuul7zwn+zoa1jS8gvio7IH+jflr
LQzGZK8mN2F5O9dTTMwGVlBuNvqbYJIr7JbPjJTfP0SYlzx2oGzsoICat1jZUmYZJQj
n7IoQdBBOrW7sF+7lPKCCnzrGMyGRMvLWLRCszl4=
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/simple;
s=ug7nbtf4gccmlpwj322ax3p6ow6yfsug; d=amazonses.com; t=1629373162;
h=From:To:Message-ID:Subject:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Date:Feedback-ID;
bh=GZk7TTBUfvA2IQp+IyJJDZK3Ji/PcD3HuG2b+jvn2hs=;
b=HNP6AEn/mhuzZZmOAFJ7F3XPDed058p7VaoNae8XJSfUtCozKx/xdURKg+plGXAD
1xt/o+QfzVmL5dfuBnB7gtxbsd7sbKFfk3eSuErblimoK4pVX5OWbjAd3Iov7vVGU3l
Ary0s0GDkRW+zW57BCVvZjBPQaEl3rni1k5e3ZtM=
From: Canva 
To: pramath...@brlf.in
Message-ID: 
<0100017b5e35603f-a4c29e51-d911-45b2-a438-352be84e3e8c-000...@email.amazonses.com>
Subject: You have been invited to join a team on Canva
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; 
boundary="=_Part_749605_1529067601.1629373161523"
Date: Thu, 19 Aug 2021 11:39:21 +
Feedback-ID:
 1.us-east-1.DcdLQsUfV4bQ5Js81yJ5zbYh1g1N/Fje4R2eTpK5fRw=:AmazonSES
X-SES-Outgoing: 2021.08.19-54.240.68.119
X-Evolution-Source: 2bffa484e091ebffd0658087c6129401f6853393


--=_Part_749605_1529067601.1629373161523
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; 
boundary="=_Part_749604_1967787393.1629373161523"


--=_Part_749604_1967787393.1629373161523
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Con

[Bug 1939868] Re: apitrace ftbfs with glibc 2.34

2021-08-20 Thread Bug Watch Updater
** Changed in: apitrace
   Status: Unknown => New

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1939868

Title:
  apitrace ftbfs with glibc 2.34

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/apitrace/+bug/1939868/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1328281] Re: bzr-buildpackage fails GPG signing

2021-08-20 Thread Igor Zinovyev
Sorry to revive this thread, but shouldn't builddeb honor the
`DEBSIGN_KEYID` environment variable and use the provided ID?

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1328281

Title:
  bzr-buildpackage fails GPG signing

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/bzr-builddeb/+bug/1328281/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1939505] Re: [ehl] Ubuntu Core boot fails on EHL

2021-08-20 Thread ethan.hsieh
Tried to install UC20 with TPM enabled and saw same error message[1] as
TGL-H.

EHL's BIOS doesn't support hash algorithm SHA384 and SM3_256.
For deails, please refer to attached photo.
BIOS version: EHLSFWI1.R00.3162.A01.2104131432

Here are steps:
1. Remove key enrolled by mokutil
2. Re-flash uc20 test image
3. Enroll KEK and Signature via BIOS settings:
[Boot Maintenance Manager Menu][Secure Boot Configuration Menu][Secure Boot 
Mode][Custom Mode][Custom Secure Boot Option]
[PK Options] => [Delete PK]
[PK Options] => [Enroll PK] => PkKek-1-snakeoil.der
[KEK Option][Enroll KEK] => PkKek-1-snakeoil.der
[DB Option][Enroll Signature] => PkKek-1-snakeoil.der
4. Clear TPM
[Intel Advanced Menu][TPM Configuration][TCG2 Configuration][TPM2 Operation]

---
[1] https://bugs.launchpad.net/intel/+bug/1938678/comments/31

** Attachment added: "PXL_20210820_073717729.MP.jpg"
   
https://bugs.launchpad.net/intel/+bug/1939505/+attachment/5519333/+files/PXL_20210820_073717729.MP.jpg

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1939505

Title:
  [ehl] Ubuntu Core boot fails on EHL

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/intel/+bug/1939505/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1938678] Re: [intel] [tgl-h][iotg] [hwe-tpm] Ubuntu Core hangs during bootup on TGL-H

2021-08-20 Thread ethan.hsieh
@Chris

I deleted and re-enrolled PK on another intel platform, EHL, and still saw same 
error message.
For details, please refer to [1].

---
[1] https://bugs.launchpad.net/intel/+bug/1939505/comments/3

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1938678

Title:
  [intel] [tgl-h][iotg] [hwe-tpm] Ubuntu Core hangs during bootup on
  TGL-H

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/intel/+bug/1938678/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1940588] Re: package shim-signed 1.40.7+15.4-0ubuntu9 failed to install/upgrade: installed shim-signed package post-installation script subprocess returned error exit status 32

2021-08-20 Thread Anders Bälter
We are seeing this error on unattended-upgrades on all Azure ubuntu
20.04 VMs.

Preconfiguring packages ...
(Reading database ... 58945 files and directories currently installed.)
Preparing to unpack .../shim_15.4-0ubuntu9_amd64.deb ...
Unpacking shim (15.4-0ubuntu9) over (15+1533136590.3beb971-0ubuntu1) ...
Preparing to unpack .../shim-signed_1.40.7+15.4-0ubuntu9_amd64.deb ...
Unpacking shim-signed (1.40.7+15.4-0ubuntu9) over 
(1.40.3+15+1533136590.3beb971-0ubuntu1) ...
Setting up shim (15.4-0ubuntu9) ...
Setting up shim-signed (1.40.7+15.4-0ubuntu9) ...
mount: /var/lib/grub/esp: special device 
/dev/disk/by-id/scsi-14d534654202020206b732779d9c8429f997bc9f57f0b9212-part15 
does not exist.
dpkg: error processing package shim-signed (--configure):
 installed shim-signed package post-installation script subprocess returned 
error exit status 32
Errors were encountered while processing:
 shim-signed

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1940588

Title:
  package shim-signed 1.40.7+15.4-0ubuntu9 failed to install/upgrade:
  installed shim-signed package post-installation script subprocess
  returned error exit status 32

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/shim-signed/+bug/1940588/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1939539] Re: Fix Intel IPU6 camera sensor HM11b1 brightness

2021-08-20 Thread Timo Aaltonen
** Changed in: linux-oem-5.13 (Ubuntu Focal)
   Status: In Progress => Fix Committed

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1939539

Title:
  Fix Intel IPU6 camera sensor HM11b1 brightness

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux-oem-5.13/+bug/1939539/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1913421] Re: Load of pre-upgrade qemu modules needs to avoid noexec

2021-08-20 Thread Christian Ehrhardt 
Iteration I:
- Bionic's and Focal's systemd do not know "ReadWriteOnly".
  That is not super-important to have, dropped from those backports
  (done)
- default mount options slightly differ >=Hirsute vs <=Focal, but nothing
  that affects the use-case
  (no action needed)
- Removing qemu-block-extra >=Hirsute has dependency issues due to -gui
  I verified that is not due to anything we change hereby
  (no action needed)
- F/B stopped the mount unit (but we want to keep it for qemu's that are around)
  (needs debugging)
- F/B had no modules saved on --reinstall
  (needs debugging)


Added test step after each action:
- also check the set of saved modules present after every action

TODO before iteration II:
 - F/B stopped the mount unit
 - F/B had no modules saved on --reinstall

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1913421

Title:
  Load of pre-upgrade qemu modules needs to avoid noexec

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/qemu/+bug/1913421/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1819208] Re: GnomeMusic crash. Weird short song in playlist.

2021-08-20 Thread Bug Watch Updater
** Changed in: gnome-music
   Status: New => Fix Released

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1819208

Title:
  GnomeMusic crash. Weird short song in playlist.

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/gnome-music/+bug/1819208/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1805025] Re: gnome-control-center power - 'Turn off Wi-Fi to save power' label is confusing

2021-08-20 Thread Bug Watch Updater
** Changed in: gnome-control-center
   Status: New => Fix Released

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1805025

Title:
  gnome-control-center power - 'Turn off Wi-Fi to save power' label is
  confusing

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/gnome-control-center/+bug/1805025/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1751954] Re: Bluetooth and Wi-Fi items in Power are worded ambiguously

2021-08-20 Thread Bug Watch Updater
** Changed in: gnome-control-center
   Status: Unknown => Fix Released

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1751954

Title:
  Bluetooth and Wi-Fi items in Power are worded ambiguously

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/gnome-control-center/+bug/1751954/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1825208] Re: Automatic suspend delay is at least 15 mins

2021-08-20 Thread Bug Watch Updater
** Changed in: gnome-control-center
   Status: New => Fix Released

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1825208

Title:
  Automatic suspend delay is at least 15 mins

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/gnome-control-center/+bug/1825208/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 11544] Re: Single click doesn't work in file chooser dialog box

2021-08-20 Thread Bug Watch Updater
** Changed in: gtk
   Status: Unknown => New

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to the bug report.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/11544

Title:
  Single click doesn't work in file chooser dialog box

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/gtk/+bug/11544/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1826078] Re: tracker-miner-fs brings system to its knees when indexing - scope for deduplicating hardlinked files?

2021-08-20 Thread Bug Watch Updater
** Changed in: tracker
   Status: New => Fix Released

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1826078

Title:
  tracker-miner-fs brings system to its knees when indexing - scope for
  deduplicating hardlinked files?

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/tracker/+bug/1826078/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1577198] Re: Imported gpg keys do not show up in Seahorse 3.18.0

2021-08-20 Thread Bug Watch Updater
** Changed in: seahorse
   Status: New => Fix Released

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1577198

Title:
  Imported gpg keys do not show up in Seahorse 3.18.0

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/seahorse/+bug/1577198/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1940629] [NEW] Support Jasper Lake

2021-08-20 Thread Andy Chi
Public bug reported:

[Impact]

 * Support thermald on Jasper Lake CPU.

 *

[Test Plan]

 * Use a machine with a Jasper Lake cpu.

 * systemctl status thermald

 * Status of thermald should be `running`

[Where problems could occur]

 * This change is to support Jasper Lake in thermald, which won't impact
other hardware.

[Other Info]
 
 * https://github.com/intel/thermal_daemon/issues/309

** Affects: thermald (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1940629

Title:
  Support Jasper Lake

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/thermald/+bug/1940629/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1939937] Re: ath10k: "add target IRAM recovery feature support" breaks QCA9984 Firmware load capability

2021-08-20 Thread sparks71
$ sudo apt-get install \
> linux-image-unsigned-5.11.0-2033-generic \
> linux-modules-extra-5.11.0-2033-generic \
> linux-headers-5.11.0-2033-generic

Holen:1 http://ppa.launchpad.net/vicamo/ppa-1939937/ubuntu focal/main amd64 
linux-hwe-5.11-headers-5.11.0-2033 all 
5.11.0-2033.35~20.04.1+lp1939937.1.ath10k.iram [12,0 MB]
Holen:2 http://ppa.launchpad.net/vicamo/ppa-1939937/ubuntu focal/main amd64 
linux-headers-5.11.0-2033-generic amd64 
5.11.0-2033.35~20.04.1+lp1939937.1.ath10k.iram [1.863 kB]
Holen:3 http://ppa.launchpad.net/vicamo/ppa-1939937/ubuntu focal/main amd64 
linux-modules-5.11.0-2033-generic amd64 
5.11.0-2033.35~20.04.1+lp1939937.1.ath10k.iram [16,2 MB]
Holen:4 http://ppa.launchpad.net/vicamo/ppa-1939937/ubuntu focal/main amd64 
linux-image-unsigned-5.11.0-2033-generic amd64 
5.11.0-2033.35~20.04.1+lp1939937.1.ath10k.iram [10,3 MB]
Holen:5 http://ppa.launchpad.net/vicamo/ppa-1939937/ubuntu focal/main amd64 
linux-modules-extra-5.11.0-2033-generic amd64 
5.11.0-2033.35~20.04.1+lp1939937.1.ath10k.iram [42,4 MB]
Es wurden 82,8 MB in 8 s geholt (10,2 MB/s).

uname -a
...  5.11.0-2033-generic #35~20.04.1+lp1939937.1.ath10k.iram-Ubuntu SMP Thu Aug 
19 16:37: x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux

dmesg | grep ath
[3.279110] ath10k_pci :03:00.0: pci irq msi oper_irq_mode 2 irq_mode 0 
reset_mode 0
[3.355016] ath10k_pci :04:00.0: pci irq msi oper_irq_mode 2 irq_mode 0 
reset_mode 0
[3.393327] ath10k_pci :03:00.0: qca9984/qca9994 hw1.0 target 0x0100 
chip_id 0x sub 168c:cafe
[3.393330] ath10k_pci :03:00.0: kconfig debug 0 debugfs 1 tracing 1 dfs 
0 testmode 0
[3.393655] ath10k_pci :03:00.0: firmware ver 10.4-3.9.0.2-00152 api 5 
features 
no-p2p,mfp,peer-flow-ctrl,btcoex-param,allows-mesh-bcast,no-ps,peer-fixed-rate,iram-recovery
 crc32 723f9771
[3.475304] ath10k_pci :04:00.0: qca9984/qca9994 hw1.0 target 0x0100 
chip_id 0x sub 168c:cafe
[3.475308] ath10k_pci :04:00.0: kconfig debug 0 debugfs 1 tracing 1 dfs 
0 testmode 0
[3.475639] ath10k_pci :04:00.0: firmware ver 10.4-3.9.0.2-00152 api 5 
features 
no-p2p,mfp,peer-flow-ctrl,btcoex-param,allows-mesh-bcast,no-ps,peer-fixed-rate,iram-recovery
 crc32 723f9771
[4.624937] ath10k_pci :03:00.0: board_file api 2 bmi_id 0:1 crc32 
85498734
[4.704618] ath10k_pci :04:00.0: board_file api 2 bmi_id 0:2 crc32 
85498734
[7.202830] ath10k_pci :03:00.0: No hardware memory
[7.202833] ath10k_pci :03:00.0: failed to copy target iram contents: -12
[7.309047] ath10k_pci :03:00.0: htt-ver 2.2 wmi-op 6 htt-op 4 cal otp 
max-sta 512 raw 0 hwcrypto 1
[7.371208] ath: EEPROM regdomain sanitized
[7.371210] ath: EEPROM regdomain: 0x64
[7.371211] ath: EEPROM indicates we should expect a direct regpair map
[7.371212] ath: Country alpha2 being used: 00
[7.371213] ath: Regpair used: 0x64
[7.373346] ath10k_pci :03:00.0 wlp3s0: renamed from wlan0
[7.382821] ath10k_pci :04:00.0: No hardware memory
[7.382824] ath10k_pci :04:00.0: failed to copy target iram contents: -12
[7.501740] ath10k_pci :04:00.0: htt-ver 2.2 wmi-op 6 htt-op 4 cal otp 
max-sta 512 raw 0 hwcrypto 1
[7.563210] ath: EEPROM regdomain sanitized
[7.563211] ath: EEPROM regdomain: 0x64
[7.563212] ath: EEPROM indicates we should expect a direct regpair map
[7.563213] ath: Country alpha2 being used: 00
[7.563214] ath: Regpair used: 0x64
[   10.009210] ath10k_pci :03:00.0: No hardware memory
[   10.009213] ath10k_pci :03:00.0: failed to copy target iram contents: -12
[   10.207585] ath10k_pci :03:00.0: Unknown eventid: 36933
[   10.215774] ath10k_pci :04:00.0 wlp4s0: renamed from wlan0
[   12.941647] ath10k_pci :04:00.0: No hardware memory
[   12.941650] ath10k_pci :04:00.0: failed to copy target iram contents: -12
[   13.166283] ath10k_pci :04:00.0: Unknown eventid: 36933


the kernel works


but I don't really understand why you set "linux (Ubuntu Focal)" to invalid

as said the patch should be back ported to all 5.11 kernels

i use the HWE kernel in Focal and it was recently pushed to 5.11

but according to the ticket description you added the linux-oem-5.13
kernel - i honestly don't understand that - but anyway

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1939937

Title:
  ath10k: "add target IRAM recovery feature support" breaks QCA9984
  Firmware load capability

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/1939937/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1940456] Re: [SRU] radosgw-admin's diagnostics are confusing if user data exists

2021-08-20 Thread nikhil kshirsagar
Attaching debdiff built on focal for octopus


** Description changed:

  This is same as LP#1914584 but its original patch was wrong which was
  found out in SRU tests and that particular release went ahead without
  the patch. Since that LP is kind of in hard-to-follow/confusing states,
  opened this new bug to carry out the SRU work.
+ 
+ --
+ 
+ [Impact]
+ 
+ When creating a new S3 user, the error message is confusing if the email
+ address used is already associated with another S3 account.
+ 
+ To reproduce:
+ 
+ radosgw-admin user create --uid=foo --display-name="Foo test" 
--email=bar@domain.invalid
+ #[ success ]
+ radosgw-admin user create --uid=test --display-name="AN test" 
--email=bar@domain.invalid
+ could not create user: unable to parse parameters, user id mismatch, 
operation id: foo does not match: test
+ 
+ As a result, it's completely unclear what went wrong with the user
+ creation.
+ 
+ [Test case]
+ 
+ Create an S3 account via radosgw-admin. Then create another user but use
+ the same email address - it should provide a clear description of what
+ the problem is.
+ 
+ [Where problems could occur]
+ 
+ The new message may yet be unclear or could complain that an email
+ exists even though it doesn't exist (false positive). It's an improved
+ diagnostic by checking if the email id exists. Perhaps, user creation
+ might become problematic if the fix doesn't work.
+ 
+ [Other Info]
+ - The patch was provided by Ponnuvel Palaniyappan (attached here)
+ - Upstream tracker: https://tracker.ceph.com/issues/50554
+ - Upstream PR: https://github.com/ceph/ceph/pull/41065
+ - Backported to Pacific, and Octopus upstream releases.

** Attachment added: "debdiff_1914584_focal"
   
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ceph/+bug/1940456/+attachment/5519336/+files/debdiff_1914584_focal

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1940456

Title:
  [SRU] radosgw-admin's diagnostics are confusing if user data exists

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ceph/+bug/1940456/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1940629] Re: Support Jasper Lake

2021-08-20 Thread Andy Chi
Upload debdiff for focal

** Patch added: "thermald_1.9.1-1ubuntu0.6.debdiff"
   
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/thermald/+bug/1940629/+attachment/5519337/+files/thermald_1.9.1-1ubuntu0.6.debdiff

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1940629

Title:
  Support Jasper Lake

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/oem-priority/+bug/1940629/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1940629] Re: Support Jasper Lake

2021-08-20 Thread Andy Chi
Upload debdiff for hirsute

** Patch added: "thermald_2.4.3-1ubuntu2.debdiff"
   
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/thermald/+bug/1940629/+attachment/5519338/+files/thermald_2.4.3-1ubuntu2.debdiff

** Tags added: oem-priority originate-from-1925196 somerville

** Changed in: oem-priority
 Assignee: (unassigned) => Andy Chi (andch)

** Changed in: oem-priority
   Importance: Undecided => Critical

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1940629

Title:
  Support Jasper Lake

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/oem-priority/+bug/1940629/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1938678] Re: [intel] [tgl-h][iotg] [hwe-tpm] Ubuntu Core hangs during bootup on TGL-H

2021-08-20 Thread ethan.hsieh
@Chris

I used another x86 machine on which I can install uc20 successfully with same 
test image.
I enrolled the key by mokutil and re-installed uc20.
I got following error message:
taskrunner.go: 271: [change 2 "Setup system for run mode" task] failed: cannot 
make system runnable: cannot seal the encryption keys: cannot add EFI secure 
boot policy profile: cannot compute secure boot policy profile: no bootable 
paths with current EFI signature database.

The error message is different from #31.
Based on test results, the root cause of #31 should not be the key enrolled by 
mokutil.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1938678

Title:
  [intel] [tgl-h][iotg] [hwe-tpm] Ubuntu Core hangs during bootup on
  TGL-H

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/intel/+bug/1938678/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1940630] [NEW] Sync git 1:2.33.0-1 (main) from Debian unstable (main)

2021-08-20 Thread Matthieu Baerts
Public bug reported:

I think we just missed the feature freeze but because it is a central
piece, maybe we can get an exception here?

There are minor differences between versions from Debian and Ubuntu.
That's why git has to be manually updated on Ubuntu. Maybe good to
include 'if' statements in the Debian version for Ubuntu flavours?

Anyway, if it is not too late, please sync git from Debian unstable.

Changelog:

git (1:2.33.0-1) unstable; urgency=low

  * new upstream release (see RelNotes/2.33.0.txt).

 -- Jonathan Nieder   Mon, 16 Aug 2021 17:54:01
-0700

Full changelog:

https://raw.githubusercontent.com/git/git/master/Documentation/RelNotes/2.33.0.txt

** Affects: git (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1940630

Title:
  Sync git 1:2.33.0-1 (main) from Debian unstable (main)

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/git/+bug/1940630/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1940629] Re: Support Jasper Lake

2021-08-20 Thread Colin Ian King
** Changed in: thermald (Ubuntu)
 Assignee: (unassigned) => Colin Ian King (colin-king)

** Changed in: thermald (Ubuntu)
   Importance: Undecided => Critical

** Changed in: thermald (Ubuntu)
   Status: New => In Progress

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1940629

Title:
  Support Jasper Lake

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/oem-priority/+bug/1940629/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1935051] Re: systemd pid 1 memory leak

2021-08-20 Thread Sergey Borodavkin
Thanks for answering!
Yep, that build fixed leak for me.

# apt-cache policy systemd
systemd:
  Installed: 245.4-4ubuntu3.12~202108090622~ubuntu20.04.1

This build will be used for official systemd-245.4-4ubuntu3.12 package ?

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1935051

Title:
  systemd pid 1 memory leak

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/systemd/+bug/1935051/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1825208] Re: Automatic suspend delay is at least 15 mins

2021-08-20 Thread Gunnar Hjalmarsson
Upstream closed this as effectively "won't fix". The issue is not
important enough for an Ubuntu specific patch, so I'm afraid we need to
follow upstream.

** Changed in: gnome-control-center (Ubuntu)
   Status: Triaged => Won't Fix

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1825208

Title:
  Automatic suspend delay is at least 15 mins

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/gnome-control-center/+bug/1825208/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1940545] Re: Update Mesa to mesa-21.1.7 on Ubuntu 20.04

2021-08-20 Thread Timo Aaltonen
I realize that, but that won't happen before impish has released. And
even then it'll take a while to land, but will happen before 20.04.4
release.

In the meantime you can use a ppa version, there are several to choose
from

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1940545

Title:
  Update Mesa to mesa-21.1.7 on Ubuntu 20.04

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/mesa/+bug/1940545/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1940631] [NEW] Keep thunderbird 91 in impish-proposed until a point release enables profile upgrades

2021-08-20 Thread Olivier Tilloy
Public bug reported:

Thunderbird 91 was released on August 11. According to the release notes
(https://www.thunderbird.net/en-US/thunderbird/91.0/releasenotes/):

  « Thunderbird version 91.0 is only offered as direct download from
thunderbird.net and not as an upgrade from Thunderbird version 78 or
earlier. A future release will provide updates from earlier versions. »

To follow upstream's lead on safe upgrades, let's keep 91 in impish-
proposed for now, until a later point release enables upgrades,
hopefully before final freeze.

** Affects: thunderbird (Ubuntu)
 Importance: High
 Assignee: Olivier Tilloy (osomon)
 Status: Triaged


** Tags: block-proposed

** Changed in: thunderbird (Ubuntu)
   Status: New => Triaged

** Changed in: thunderbird (Ubuntu)
   Importance: Undecided => High

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1940631

Title:
  Keep thunderbird 91 in impish-proposed until a point release enables
  profile upgrades

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/thunderbird/+bug/1940631/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1904630]

2021-08-20 Thread Pinskia
Dup of bug 101171.

*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 101171 ***

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1904630

Title:
  gcc-10 compilation failure in c_expr_sizeof_expr

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/gcc/+bug/1904630/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1831385]

2021-08-20 Thread Hewillk
*** Bug 101855 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1831385

Title:
  `std::cosf`, `std::sinf`, `std::sqrtf` are not declared in ``

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/gcc/+bug/1831385/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1939997] Re: Thunderbird >78 needs libgpgme11 to stage packages

2021-08-20 Thread Sebastien Bacher
Thanks for the patch, the candidate and beta snaps have been updated now

** Changed in: thunderbird (Ubuntu)
   Importance: Undecided => Low

** Changed in: thunderbird (Ubuntu)
   Status: New => Fix Released

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1939997

Title:
  Thunderbird >78 needs libgpgme11 to stage packages

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/thunderbird/+bug/1939997/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1904630] Re: gcc-10 compilation failure in c_expr_sizeof_expr

2021-08-20 Thread Bug Watch Updater
** Changed in: gcc
   Status: Confirmed => Invalid

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1904630

Title:
  gcc-10 compilation failure in c_expr_sizeof_expr

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/gcc/+bug/1904630/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 995590] Re: unable to build upstream gcc due to multiarch setup (bits/predefs.h: No such file or directory)

2021-08-20 Thread Bug Watch Updater
** Changed in: gcc
   Status: Confirmed => Fix Released

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/995590

Title:
  unable to build upstream gcc due to multiarch setup (bits/predefs.h:
  No such file or directory)

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/gcc/+bug/995590/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 342335] Re: [PR39461] ICE compiling qt4-x11 on powerpc

2021-08-20 Thread Bug Watch Updater
Launchpad has imported 9 comments from the remote bug at
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39175.

If you reply to an imported comment from within Launchpad, your comment
will be sent to the remote bug automatically. Read more about
Launchpad's inter-bugtracker facilities at
https://help.launchpad.net/InterBugTracking.


On 2009-02-13T09:21:55+00:00 Jakub-gcc wrote:

/* { dg-options "-O2 -m32 -fvisibility=hidden -msecure-plt -fpic" } */

__attribute__((noinline)) int
foo (int x)
{
  return x;
}

int foo (int x);

int
bar (int x)
{
  return foo (x);
}

ICEs on the
  if (DEFAULT_ABI == ABI_V4 && flag_pic)
{
  gcc_assert (!TARGET_SECURE_PLT);
  return \"b %z1@plt\";
}
  else
return \"b %z1\";
assertion in sibcall_value_nonlocal_sysv.

Reply at:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gcc-4.3/+bug/342335/comments/0


On 2009-02-13T10:36:19+00:00 Jakub-gcc wrote:

The problem is in the redundant prototype after function.
First the foo FUNCTION_DECL is created, afterwards finish_function calls 
c_determine_visibility on it which changes its visibility from default to 
hidden.
After this make_decl_rtl is called, determines the function binds locally and 
sets SYMBOL_FLAG_LOCAL|SYMBOL_FLAG_FUNCTION.  Then merge_decls is called, which 
in turn clears visibility (sets it back to default) and calls make_decl_rtl to 
update the flags.  At this point targetm.binds_local_p returns false, as it at 
that point has default visibility, so changes DECL_RTL's flags to 
SYMBOL_FLAG_FUNCTION alone.  Then finish_decl calls c_determine_visibility 
again and sets it back to hidden visibility.  But nothing afterwards calls 
make_decl_rtl again to update the symbol flags again.

To fix this, IMHO either c_determine_visibility and C++ determine_visibility
need to
if (((TREE_CODE (decl) == VAR_DECL && TREE_STATIC (decl))
 || TREE_CODE (decl) == FUNCTION_DECL)
&& DECL_RTL_SET_P (decl))
  make_decl_rtl (decl);
if it changed the visibility, or merge_decls/duplicate_decls would need to 
determine visibility.  I'll try the former.

Reply at:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gcc-4.3/+bug/342335/comments/1


On 2009-02-13T11:33:09+00:00 Jakub-gcc wrote:

Created attachment 17292
gcc44-pr39175.patch

Patch I'm going to bootstrap/regtest.

Reply at:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gcc-4.3/+bug/342335/comments/2


On 2009-02-13T12:44:46+00:00 Rguenth wrote:

This also ICEs on the 4.3 branch.

Reply at:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gcc-4.3/+bug/342335/comments/3


On 2009-02-19T21:15:25+00:00 Jakub-gcc wrote:

Subject: Bug 39175

Author: jakub
Date: Thu Feb 19 21:15:12 2009
New Revision: 144305

URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=144305
Log:
PR target/39175
* c-common.c (c_determine_visibility): If visibility changed and
DECL_RTL has been already set, call make_decl_rtl to update symbol
flags.

* decl2.c (determine_visibility): If visibility changed and
DECL_RTL has been already set, call make_decl_rtl to update symbol
flags.

* gcc.dg/visibility-20.c: New test.
* g++.dg/ext/visibility/visibility-11.C: New test.

Added:
trunk/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/ext/visibility/visibility-11.C
trunk/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/visibility-20.c
Modified:
trunk/gcc/ChangeLog
trunk/gcc/c-common.c
trunk/gcc/cp/ChangeLog
trunk/gcc/cp/decl2.c
trunk/gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog


Reply at:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gcc-4.3/+bug/342335/comments/4


On 2009-02-19T21:16:48+00:00 Jakub-gcc wrote:

Fixed on the trunk so far.

Reply at:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gcc-4.3/+bug/342335/comments/5


On 2009-03-15T09:47:34+00:00 Matthias Klose wrote:

*** Bug 39461 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

Reply at:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gcc-4.3/+bug/342335/comments/13


On 2009-03-25T22:05:21+00:00 Bje-0 wrote:

Subject: Bug 39175

Author: bje
Date: Wed Mar 25 22:05:08 2009
New Revision: 145076

URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=145076
Log:
Backport from mainline:
2009-02-19  Jakub Jelinek  

PR target/39175
* c-common.c (c_determine_visibility): If visibility changed and
DECL_RTL has been already set, call make_decl_rtl to update symbol
flags.

cp/
* decl2.c (determine_visibility): If visibility changed an

[Bug 172326] Re: Reproducable SIGSEGV (char ************* etc.)

2021-08-20 Thread Bug Watch Updater
Launchpad has imported 6 comments from the remote bug at
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31804.

If you reply to an imported comment from within Launchpad, your comment
will be sent to the remote bug automatically. Read more about
Launchpad's inter-bugtracker facilities at
https://help.launchpad.net/InterBugTracking.


On 2007-05-03T21:10:44+00:00 Rwxr-xr-x wrote:

$ perl -wle 'print "int", "*" x 99, "p;"' >try.c && gcc try.c
gcc: Internal error: Segmentation fault (program cc1)
...

$ gcc -v
Using built-in specs.
Target: i686-pc-linux-gnu
Configured with: 
/var/tmp/portage/sys-devel/gcc-4.1.1-r3/work/gcc-4.1.1/configure --prefix=/usr 
--bindir=/usr/i686-pc-linux-gnu/gcc-bin/4.1.1 
--includedir=/usr/lib/gcc/i686-pc-linux-gnu/4.1.1/include 
--datadir=/usr/share/gcc-data/i686-pc-linux-gnu/4.1.1 
--mandir=/usr/share/gcc-data/i686-pc-linux-gnu/4.1.1/man 
--infodir=/usr/share/gcc-data/i686-pc-linux-gnu/4.1.1/info 
--with-gxx-include-dir=/usr/lib/gcc/i686-pc-linux-gnu/4.1.1/include/g++-v4 
--host=i686-pc-linux-gnu --build=i686-pc-linux-gnu --disable-altivec 
--enable-nls --without-included-gettext --with-system-zlib --disable-checking 
--disable-werror --enable-secureplt --disable-libunwind-exceptions 
--disable-multilib --disable-libmudflap --disable-libssp --enable-java-awt=gtk 
--enable-languages=c,c++,java,fortran --enable-shared --enable-threads=posix 
--enable-__cxa_atexit --enable-clocale=gnu
Thread model: posix
gcc version 4.1.1 (Gentoo 4.1.1-r3)

gcc-4.3-20070427 seems to have the same problem.
3.4.6 works fine, but after increasing the number of *'s to  it says:
cc1: out of memory allocating 1677721600 bytes after a total of 845819904 bytes

So this problem seems to be new in gcc4.

Reply at:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gcc-4.1/+bug/172326/comments/0


On 2007-05-03T22:02:50+00:00 Rguenth wrote:

you must be kidding.

Reply at:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gcc-4.1/+bug/172326/comments/1


On 2007-05-04T03:40:57+00:00 Fang-a wrote:

adding to personal favorite list :)

Reply at:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gcc-4.1/+bug/172326/comments/2


On 2007-05-04T04:50:41+00:00 Bangerth wrote:

(In reply to comment #0)
> $ perl -wle 'print "int", "*" x 99, "p;"' >try.c && gcc try.c
> gcc: Internal error: Segmentation fault (program cc1)

Yo, dude, that would take a seriously long program to even initialize
that pointer :-)

But seriously, while I do think that we should strive to compile even
programs that are "weird" or "unusual" in their requirements on the 
compiler, I think that this one goes a little overboard. I would,
however, be interested to hear how many levels of pointers gcc
actually *can* compile. I would imagine it's at least a few
hundred, maybe thousand. Maybe you could try to figure out?

Best
  Wolfgang

Reply at:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gcc-4.1/+bug/172326/comments/3


On 2007-05-04T12:00:27+00:00 Joseph-codesourcery wrote:

Subject: Re:  gcc segfaults on very long pointer chains

On Fri, 4 May 2007, bangerth at dealii dot org wrote:

> But seriously, while I do think that we should strive to compile even
> programs that are "weird" or "unusual" in their requirements on the 
> compiler, I think that this one goes a little overboard. I would,
> however, be interested to hear how many levels of pointers gcc
> actually *can* compile. I would imagine it's at least a few
> hundred, maybe thousand. Maybe you could try to figure out?

That would depend on your stack limit (so the question would really be, 
for each extra MB of stack limit how many more levels can it compile)?  
For such extreme programs I think it's reasonable to expect users to 
increase their stack limit when running the compiler.

Although in this case, it would be reasonably straightforward to make 
c_parser_declarator iterative (with an internal linked list on the parser 
obstack) rather than recursive - if that were actually of use in compiling 
real code with real stack limits.


Reply at:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gcc-4.1/+bug/172326/comments/4


On 2007-12-15T20:46:05+00:00 Pinskia wrote:

*** Bug 34308 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

Reply at:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gcc-4.1/+bug/172326/comments/11

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/172326

Title:
  Reproducable SIGSEGV (char * etc.)

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.laun

[Bug 1923335] Re: At shutdown the spinner logo disappears and a second later it comes back frozen for a while (in kernel 5.11 but 5.10.16 works)

2021-08-20 Thread Daniel van Vugt
** Changed in: linux (Ubuntu)
 Assignee: (unassigned) => Daniel van Vugt (vanvugt)

** Changed in: linux (Ubuntu)
   Status: Confirmed => In Progress

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1923335

Title:
  At shutdown the spinner logo disappears and a second later it comes
  back frozen for a while (in kernel 5.11 but 5.10.16 works)

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/1923335/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1897764] Re: mem-on-off-test.sh from memory-hotplug in ubuntu_kernel_selftests failed on X-gcp-4.15 / F-5.4 zVM

2021-08-20 Thread Krzysztof Kozlowski
** Changed in: linux (Ubuntu Bionic)
   Status: Confirmed => Invalid

** Changed in: linux (Ubuntu Focal)
   Status: Confirmed => Invalid

** Changed in: linux (Ubuntu Groovy)
   Status: Confirmed => Invalid

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1897764

Title:
  mem-on-off-test.sh from memory-hotplug in ubuntu_kernel_selftests
  failed on X-gcp-4.15 / F-5.4 zVM

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu-kernel-tests/+bug/1897764/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1845797]

2021-08-20 Thread freedman.joshua
Yoga c930 Ubuntu20.10 and kernel 5.10.16
Microphone still doesn't work
Speakers are ok but not great.

The mic should work, but it doesn't, please fix mic.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1845797

Title:
  Microphone not detected Lenovo Yoga S940

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/linux/+bug/1845797/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1845797]

2021-08-20 Thread ivandr
In this thread there is some encouraging move on the DMIC issue
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=201251
I have applied the suggested patch but no successful. The issue as far as i 
understand that all work on fixing is doing on the SOF driver, which is not 
working itself on C930 model, only HDA is working, but path is not for HDA. 
Some endless loop ((

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1845797

Title:
  Microphone not detected Lenovo Yoga S940

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/linux/+bug/1845797/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1845797]

2021-08-20 Thread pfpschneider
The mic problem should be addressed by upgrades to the sof drivers.  You
may have to get some sort of quirk added for the C930.

The speaker problem is very likely an amp that is not turned on.  See
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=205755 for more information
and a partial fix for 14" C940s.  The BIOS upgrade doesn't work for
C930s.  See the referenced thread on the Lenovo site.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1845797

Title:
  Microphone not detected Lenovo Yoga S940

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/linux/+bug/1845797/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1845797]

2021-08-20 Thread ivandr
I just checked the solution from this thread 
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=201251 and it worked for DMIC, it 
appeared.
So what was needed in my case is
options snd_pcm max_alloc_per_card=41943040
I tried in ArchLinux 5.11.7.
Only issue is that  the recording level too quiet and in fact is non 
operational ), but i think it is a great step forward any case. It is the first 
time when i saw microphone in Linux settings on my Lenovo Yoga C930 )
You should use no snd_intel_dspcfg dsp_driver options or use only
options snd_intel_dspcfg dsp_driver=2
Would be great to find solution to fix the level of recording now.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1845797

Title:
  Microphone not detected Lenovo Yoga S940

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/linux/+bug/1845797/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1845797]

2021-08-20 Thread freedman.joshua
Two years and this is still a problem.
Yoga c930, running ubuntu 21.04 and 5.12.5

Microphone works in Win10, not in Linux.  Speakers have issues also.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1845797

Title:
  Microphone not detected Lenovo Yoga S940

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/linux/+bug/1845797/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1845797]

2021-08-20 Thread perex
Adding Lenovo contacts to Cc...

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1845797

Title:
  Microphone not detected Lenovo Yoga S940

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/linux/+bug/1845797/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1845797]

2021-08-20 Thread pfpschneider
The problem is that the BIOS doesn't activate the amplifiers on the
bottom of the body.   Someone sent in an unofficial BIOS for the C940
that fixes the problem for the C940 only.  See
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=205755

There is a related problem with the 9i that has a proposed fix that
appears to work.   See https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/alsa-
driver/+bug/1926165  This fix may not be enough for the C930 and C940
but it might be possible to get a fix for them that doesn't require a
non-official BIOS.

By the way, I don't think that any of these laptops have five-channel
sound.   There is the soundbar with two or three speakers and the two
lower-range (I hesitate to call them bass) speakers on the bottom of the
laptop.  I don't expect that sound under Linux is as good as sound under
Windows as I believe Windows has a Dolby ATMOS sound driver for these
laptops that probably does some special equalization.

The microphone should work in modern kernels.  I'm running Fedora
5.11.20 but I think the microphone was fine throughout the 5.10 kernel
and maybe even earlier.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1845797

Title:
  Microphone not detected Lenovo Yoga S940

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/linux/+bug/1845797/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1845797]

2021-08-20 Thread perex
In other words: We don't have enough information to support this hw
(speakers). If vendor is not willing to add support to BIOS or give us
necessary information to add the proper initialization for the I2C
amplifiers to the driver, the only way is the reverse engineering (grab
the initialization HDA verbs in qemu or so). The another problem is that
the I2C master block in the Realtek codecs is not documented. Those
registers are hidden as the vendor specific coefficient registers.

For the mic volume - you may try to play with PGA / Dmic volume controls
in the native ALSA mixer application (like alsamixer). But it should
work with latest pulseaudio / UCM configuration.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1845797

Title:
  Microphone not detected Lenovo Yoga S940

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/linux/+bug/1845797/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1845797]

2021-08-20 Thread pfpschneider
Agreed.  I have no idea how the fix for the 9i speakers was engineered.
It is in the form of a bunch of modifications to the 0x20 widget of the
card using hda-verb.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1845797

Title:
  Microphone not detected Lenovo Yoga S940

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/linux/+bug/1845797/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1845797]

2021-08-20 Thread perex
Example "black magic" initialization of speakers for Lenovo Ideapad
S740:

https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/commit/?id=26928ca1f06aab4361eb5adbe7ef3b5c82f13cf2

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1845797

Title:
  Microphone not detected Lenovo Yoga S940

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/linux/+bug/1845797/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1845797]

2021-08-20 Thread dober
Created attachment 296927
attachment-21708-0.html

I am on Holiday and will be returning on June 01 2021

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1845797

Title:
  Microphone not detected Lenovo Yoga S940

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/linux/+bug/1845797/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1845797]

2021-08-20 Thread markpearson
We confirmed a while back with the BIOS team that they weren't going to
be able to do the changes needed on this platform unfortunately. Sorry

We weren't able to get any details on the initialization verbs either
(tried). Are we able to reverse engineer it as was done on the S740. I
believe the person who did that published the steps they followed...I
thought I had them stashed somewhere, but can't find them right now :(

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1845797

Title:
  Microphone not detected Lenovo Yoga S940

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/linux/+bug/1845797/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1845797]

2021-08-20 Thread perex
The qemu information (link) is in the commit I mentioned in comment#23 :

  https://github.com/ryanprescott/realtek-verb-tools/wiki/How-to-sniff-
verbs-from-a-Windows-sound-driver

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1845797

Title:
  Microphone not detected Lenovo Yoga S940

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/linux/+bug/1845797/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1845797]

2021-08-20 Thread logsysoftware
I have followed the tutorial on sniffing verbs from a virtual machine
and have managed to get a windows virtual machine outputting to all
speakers, however running the dumped verbs don't output to the bottom
speakers still.

I don't know much about audio drivers and such, so if anyone wants to
try running the verbs I got from that tutorial and the unprocessed QEMU
output, feel free to look them up in this github repo:
https://github.com/joao99pacheco/c930-audio-verbs

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1845797

Title:
  Microphone not detected Lenovo Yoga S940

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/linux/+bug/1845797/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1829978] Re: cpuacct_100_100 from controllers test suite in LTP failed

2021-08-20 Thread Krzysztof Kozlowski
** Changed in: linux (Ubuntu)
   Status: Incomplete => Invalid

** Changed in: linux (Ubuntu Bionic)
   Status: Incomplete => Invalid

** Changed in: linux-aws (Ubuntu)
   Status: Confirmed => Invalid

** Changed in: linux-aws (Ubuntu Bionic)
   Status: Confirmed => Invalid

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1829978

Title:
  cpuacct_100_100 from controllers test suite in LTP failed

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu-kernel-tests/+bug/1829978/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1730924]

2021-08-20 Thread andy.shevchenko
*** Bug 195183 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1730924

Title:
  Wifi does down "crash" in Surface Pro 4

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/linux/+bug/1730924/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1922406] Re: Intel AX210 Wi-Fi card does not work since updating to 1.196

2021-08-20 Thread Bug Watch Updater
Launchpad has imported 20 comments from the remote bug at
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=212371.

If you reply to an imported comment from within Launchpad, your comment
will be sent to the remote bug automatically. Read more about
Launchpad's inter-bugtracker facilities at
https://help.launchpad.net/InterBugTracking.


On 2021-03-21T02:57:40+00:00 daboross wrote:

Created attachment 295967
BROKEN dmesg log for 5.11.7

kernel 5.11.7-200.fc33.x86_64+debug

Likely related to my running an Intel AX210 chip.

iwlwifi detects the AX210 chip, but it errors out while loading, and
NetworkManager does not find the device.

This is broken on at least 5.11.3-300.fc34.x86_64,
5.11.7-200.fc33.x86_64+debug and
5.12.0-0.rc3.20210319git8b12a62a4e3e.172.fc35.x86_64.

This works (the bug does NOT occur) on 5.11.2-300.fc34.x86_64.

Related arch linux bug at https://bugs.archlinux.org/task/70071. I'm
submitting this here because I'm on Fedora, and thus I believe this is a
cross-system kernel issue.

[   11.466042] iwlwifi :04:00.0: enabling device ( -> 0002)
[   11.513767] iwlwifi :04:00.0: api flags index 2 larger than supported by 
driver
[   11.513897] iwlwifi :04:00.0: TLV_FW_FSEQ_VERSION: FSEQ Version: 
93.8.63.28
[   11.515808] iwlwifi :04:00.0: loaded firmware version 59.601f3a66.0 
ty-a0-gf-a0-59.ucode op_mode iwlmvm
[   11.724017] iwlwifi :04:00.0: Detected Intel(R) Wi-Fi 6 AX210 160MHz, 
REV=0x420
[   11.912643] iwlwifi :04:00.0: loaded PNVM version 0x324cd670
[   12.014922] iwlwifi :04:00.0: Timeout waiting for PNVM load!
[   12.014931] iwlwifi :04:00.0: Failed to start RT ucode: -110
[   12.014941] iwlwifi :04:00.0: iwl_trans_send_cmd bad state = 1
[   12.222898] iwlwifi :04:00.0: firmware didn't ACK the reset - continue 
anyway
[   12.236033] iwlwifi :04:00.0: Failed to run INIT ucode: -110


Full dmesg logs for 5.12.0, 5.11.3 (BROKEN) and 5.11.2 (WORKING) attached.

Reply at: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux-
firmware/+bug/1922406/comments/0


On 2021-03-21T02:58:20+00:00 daboross wrote:

Created attachment 295969
BROKEN dmesg log for 5.12.0-0.rc3

Reply at: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux-
firmware/+bug/1922406/comments/1


On 2021-03-21T02:58:54+00:00 daboross wrote:

Created attachment 295971
WORKING dmesg log for 5.11.2

Reply at: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux-
firmware/+bug/1922406/comments/2


On 2021-03-21T03:13:58+00:00 daboross wrote:

Created attachment 295973
BROKEN dmesg log for 5.11.3

Reply at: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux-
firmware/+bug/1922406/comments/3


On 2021-03-21T03:26:49+00:00 daboross wrote:

Created attachment 295975
lspci -vvnn

Reply at: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux-
firmware/+bug/1922406/comments/4


On 2021-03-21T03:29:02+00:00 daboross wrote:

May be related to https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=211165.
Same error message, but that bug has only 2/100 reproducibility, while
this bug is 100% reproducible on my system.

Reply at: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux-
firmware/+bug/1922406/comments/5


On 2021-03-22T15:17:16+00:00 lordheavym wrote:

Archlinux bug report: https://bugs.archlinux.org/task/70071

Reply at: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux-
firmware/+bug/1922406/comments/6


On 2021-03-22T15:23:21+00:00 pbrobinson wrote:

Fedora bug report: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1940263

Reply at: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux-
firmware/+bug/1922406/comments/7


On 2021-03-22T19:11:13+00:00 cuebix wrote:

I have the same issue on a brand new system that came with the AX210 and
haven't been able to get it to work at all. I get pretty much the same
error messages:

➜  ~ sudo dmesg | grep iwlwifi
[5.300620] iwlwifi :03:00.0: enabling device ( -> 0002)
[5.315109] iwlwifi :03:00.0: api flags index 2 larger than supported by 
driver
[5.315125] iwlwifi :03:00.0: TLV_FW_FSEQ_VERSION: FSEQ Version: 
93.8.63.28
[5.315357] iwlwifi :03:00.0: loaded firmware version 59.601f3a66.0 
ty-a0-gf-a0-59.ucode op_mode iwlmvm
[5.649887] iwlwifi :03:00.0: Detected Intel(R) Wi-Fi 6 AX210 160MHz, 
REV=0x420
[5.819781] iwlwifi :03:00.0: loaded PNVM version 0x324cd670
[5.922953] iwlwifi :03:00.0: Timeout 

[Bug 1845797] Re: Microphone not detected Lenovo Yoga S940

2021-08-20 Thread Bug Watch Updater
** Bug watch added: Linux Kernel Bug Tracker #201251
   https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=201251

** Bug watch added: Linux Kernel Bug Tracker #205755
   https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=205755

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1845797

Title:
  Microphone not detected Lenovo Yoga S940

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/linux/+bug/1845797/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1770587]

2021-08-20 Thread Acdp
Not sure I can add here as on 10.15.7 macOS

However, there is some familiarity on this issue. I seem to recall
having similer situ a few versions of TB back AND macOS, maybe that
version. At the time I think i srted by setting the profile window at
startup to appear and so I could then choose an existing profile already
set - think I also copied one profile to another directory (folder) and
renamed it and chose that from the Profile window

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1770587

Title:
  creation of new email account impossible in thunderbird

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/thunderbird/+bug/1770587/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1870827]

2021-08-20 Thread Gpascutto
Bug 1719279 suggests this fix never worked.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1870827

Title:
  Firefox hangs after simultaneously opening Chrome/Electron-based
  applications

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/firefox/+bug/1870827/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1939310] Re: Intel Warnings while booting Ice Lake w/VROC

2021-08-20 Thread Kleber Sacilotto de Souza
** Also affects: linux (Ubuntu)
   Importance: Undecided
   Status: New

** Also affects: linux (Ubuntu Bionic)
   Importance: Undecided
   Status: New

** Changed in: linux (Ubuntu Bionic)
   Status: New => Confirmed

** Changed in: linux (Ubuntu)
   Status: New => Invalid

** Tags added: sru-20210816

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1939310

Title:
  Intel Warnings while booting Ice Lake w/VROC

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu-kernel-tests/+bug/1939310/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1938152] Re: Printing output gets truncated on 90.0.0 and 90.0.1

2021-08-20 Thread Bug Watch Updater
Launchpad has imported 63 comments from the remote bug at
https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1720621.

If you reply to an imported comment from within Launchpad, your comment
will be sent to the remote bug automatically. Read more about
Launchpad's inter-bugtracker facilities at
https://help.launchpad.net/InterBugTracking.


On 2021-07-15T03:26:09+00:00 Asif Youssuff wrote:

Created attachment 9231261
Live music to return to the Budweiser Stage in August with back-to-back shows 
by 'The Arkells' | CP24.com - bad.pdf

From
https://www.reddit.com/r/firefox/comments/okhqub/firefox_90_print_to_pdf_printing_cuts_off_14_of/

Steps to reproduce:

1. Go to 
https://www.cp24.com/news/live-music-to-return-to-the-budweiser-stage-in-august-with-back-to-back-shows-by-the-arkells-1.5509243
2. Do Print 
3. Save to PDF

What happens:

The right side of the page is cut off - missing parts of sentences
(words).

Expected result:

Content should not be missing from output.

10:58.39 INFO: Narrowed integration regression window from [3557d61e, 411d3031] 
(3 builds) to [d7a58cff, 411d3031] (2 builds) (~1 steps left)
10:58.39 INFO: No more integration revisions, bisection finished.
10:58.39 INFO: Last good revision: d7a58cff3e920dfbfdfe29c76a2822f7b916c0d3
10:58.39 INFO: First bad revision: 411d3031b1b4c0f8b9ff3009ceb21ba4cfdc601e
10:58.39 INFO: Pushlog:
https://hg.mozilla.org/integration/autoland/pushloghtml?fromchange=d7a58cff3e920dfbfdfe29c76a2822f7b916c0d3&tochange=411d3031b1b4c0f8b9ff3009ceb21ba4cfdc601e

Reply at:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/firefox/+bug/1938152/comments/0


On 2021-07-15T03:26:26+00:00 Asif Youssuff wrote:

Created attachment 9231262
Live music to return to the Budweiser Stage in August with back-to-back shows 
by 'The Arkells' | CP24.com - good.pdf

Reply at:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/firefox/+bug/1938152/comments/1


On 2021-07-15T03:27:34+00:00 Asif Youssuff wrote:

[Tracking Requested - why for this release]:

Regression in PDF output that - may also affected printed output, which
would be a waste of paper.

Reply at:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/firefox/+bug/1938152/comments/2


On 2021-07-15T13:14:24+00:00 Julien Cristau wrote:

This is a new regression in the just-released 90.  Can you take a look?

Reply at:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/firefox/+bug/1938152/comments/3


On 2021-07-16T05:05:24+00:00 Jscher2000 wrote:

Also see my bug 1720622 for additional examples and characterization.

Reply at:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/firefox/+bug/1938152/comments/4


On 2021-07-16T07:23:56+00:00 Julien Cristau wrote:

Matt noted bug 1717703 may fix this.

Reply at:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/firefox/+bug/1938152/comments/5


On 2021-07-16T09:35:42+00:00 Igelmann wrote:

Same bug here. Firefox 90

when auto scaling is on in Print dialog. Scaled Page on the left gets
cut of

added in my print.css

 body {
 transform-origin: 0 0;
 transform: scale(.65); //thats what i need
 }

so the print dialog has nothing to scale...

Then the Printout is okay

Reply at:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/firefox/+bug/1938152/comments/6


On 2021-07-17T03:13:24+00:00 Matt-woodrow wrote:

Created attachment 9231682
Bug 1720621 - Adjust display list building rect for page scale transform within 
nsPageContentFrame. r?miko

Reply at:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/firefox/+bug/1938152/comments/7


On 2021-07-17T03:15:20+00:00 Matt-woodrow wrote:

Same type of bug as bug 1717703, though in a different spot.

Would be nice to add a test here, but haven't had time for that.

This is super low risk, so happy to push it through for uplift if it's
deemed important enough.

Reply at:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/firefox/+bug/1938152/comments/8


On 2021-07-19T08:12:32+00:00 Julien Cristau wrote:

I've added this bug as a known issue in the 90.0 release notes.

Reply at:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/firefox/+bug/1938152/comments/9


On 2021-07-19T08:26:08+00:00 Pascalc wrote:

(In reply to Matt Woodrow (:mattwoodrow) from comment #8)
> Same type of bug as bug 1717703, though in a different spot.
>

[Bug 1770587] Re: creation of new email account impossible in thunderbird

2021-08-20 Thread Bug Watch Updater
** Changed in: thunderbird
   Importance: Medium => Unknown

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1770587

Title:
  creation of new email account impossible in thunderbird

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/thunderbird/+bug/1770587/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1932328] Re: Thunderbird under Wayland does not correctly close (or manage) windows

2021-08-20 Thread Bug Watch Updater
Launchpad has imported 12 comments from the remote bug at
https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1724656.

If you reply to an imported comment from within Launchpad, your comment
will be sent to the remote bug automatically. Read more about
Launchpad's inter-bugtracker facilities at
https://help.launchpad.net/InterBugTracking.


On 2021-08-09T03:33:34+00:00 Tristan wrote:

Created attachment 9235322
tb.png

User Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Ubuntu; Linux x86_64; rv:90.0)
Gecko/20100101 Firefox/90.0

Steps to reproduce:

1. set wayland as window manager
2. open thunderbird, create or reply to an email and a second compose window 
appears
3. click send and compose window vanishes
4 thunderbird appears to still have two windows open but the second cannot be 
seen
5. repeat to create additional "phantom" windows

I am using Pop!_OS 21.04 (Ubuntu) with Mesa graphics and wayland enabled


Actual results:

from what I can assume, when sending an email the compose window closes,
but thunderbird/wayland still believes it to be open. if additional
phantom windows are created and thunderbird is closed, the phantom
windows stay open and thunderbird can't be started again until restart
occurs


Expected results:

once compose window closes, thunderbird should only display and report
main window open. If i fall back to x11 the program works as expected.

Reply at:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/thunderbird/+bug/1932328/comments/18


On 2021-08-09T14:06:32+00:00 Wls220spring wrote:

Sorry, I don't use Wayland on my Fedora 34 Workstation and can't
confirm.

Reply at:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/thunderbird/+bug/1932328/comments/19


On 2021-08-09T22:21:21+00:00 Tristan wrote:

Wayland is the default WM on fedora? unless its disabled for nVidia

simply switch at the login screen, replicate the bug, then switch back

https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/quick-docs/configuring-xorg-as-
default-gnome-session/

Reply at:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/thunderbird/+bug/1932328/comments/20


On 2021-08-10T14:56:05+00:00 Wls220spring wrote:

(In reply to gfunk from comment #2)
> Wayland is the default WM on fedora? unless its disabled for nVidia
> 
> simply switch at the login screen, replicate the bug, then switch back
> 
> https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/quick-docs/configuring-xorg-as-default-gnome-session/

Disabled.

WebGL 1 Driver Renderer NVIDIA Corporation -- GeForce GT 630/PCIe/SSE2
WebGL 1 Driver Version  4.6.0 NVIDIA 390.144

Reply at:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/thunderbird/+bug/1932328/comments/21


On 2021-08-13T21:40:28+00:00 Olivier Tilloy wrote:

Is this specific to the Thunderbird Ubuntu package, or can you also
observe it with upstream builds downloaded from
https://www.thunderbird.net/download/ ?

Reply at:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/thunderbird/+bug/1932328/comments/22


On 2021-08-13T22:41:39+00:00 Olivier Tilloy wrote:

I'm answering my own question: I have managed to reproduce the issue
with the upstream build for 78.13.0, downloaded from thunderbird.net, in
a fully up-to-date Ubuntu 21.04 VM, executed with MOZ_ENABLE_WAYLAND=1.

Reply at:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/thunderbird/+bug/1932328/comments/26


On 2021-08-14T06:25:46+00:00 Tristan wrote:

(In reply to Olivier Tilloy from comment #5)
> I'm answering my own question: I have managed to reproduce the issue with the 
> upstream build for 78.13.0, downloaded from thunderbird.net, in a fully 
> up-to-date Ubuntu 21.04 VM, executed with MOZ_ENABLE_WAYLAND=1.

thanks!

I might try on a fedora machine too if i get time

Reply at:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/thunderbird/+bug/1932328/comments/28


On 2021-08-14T08:40:32+00:00 Richard Marti wrote:

TB 78 is one year old with mostly only security updates in this year and
the support ends around October. In this year Mozilla introduced a lot
of Wayland changes. Maybe you could test TB 91 which is the next release
version of TB? TB 91 was released this week and probably not yet in the
distros.

Reply at:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/thunderbird/+bug/1932328/comments/29


On 2021-08-16T14:49:55+00:00 Olivier Tilloy wrote:

I have also reproduced the problem with the upstream build for 91.0,
downloaded from thunderbird.net, in a fully up-to-date Ubuntu 21.04 VM,
execu

[Bug 1672139]

2021-08-20 Thread Lebar
I've got some working code that I was going to submit to Phabricator,
but I thought that I would check here first on the protocol for context
menu changes.  I opted for a "Reveal in Bookmark Tree" context menu
entry in the Library that would navigate to the appropriate place in the
tree and then highlight the entry in the right-hand panel (this seemed
more sensible than devising a new window just to show path).  Is there
some specific vetting process for menu/GUI changes?  Are there other
reviewers other than Mark or Marco that need to be included in the
commits?

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1672139

Title:
  Add "Open Enclosing Folder" context menu to search results of
  bookmarks in the Library window (link to view/open containing folder,
  parent folder button)

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/firefox/+bug/1672139/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1672139]

2021-08-20 Thread Lebar
Created attachment 9233427
Bug 469441 - Added 'reveal in bookmark tree' context menu item for bookmark 
library searches. r=standard8,mak

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1672139

Title:
  Add "Open Enclosing Folder" context menu to search results of
  bookmarks in the Library window (link to view/open containing folder,
  parent folder button)

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/firefox/+bug/1672139/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1672139]

2021-08-20 Thread Rcandres
(In reply to Lebar from comment #51)
> I've got some working code that I was going to submit to Phabricator, but I 
> thought that I would check here first on the protocol for context menu 
> changes.  I opted for a "Reveal in Bookmark Tree" context menu entry in the 
> Library that would navigate to the appropriate place in the tree and then 
> highlight the entry in the right-hand panel (this seemed more sensible than 
> devising a new window just to show path).  Is there some specific vetting 
> process for menu/GUI changes?  Are there other reviewers other than Mark or 
> Marco that need to be included in the commits?

This sounds absolutely awesome. I wish you the best of luck and hope
that getting it integrated goes well. I can't overstate how much I've
been waiting for this feature.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1672139

Title:
  Add "Open Enclosing Folder" context menu to search results of
  bookmarks in the Library window (link to view/open containing folder,
  parent folder button)

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/firefox/+bug/1672139/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1672139]

2021-08-20 Thread Rcandres
(In reply to eberger from comment #57)
> I am so glad to hear this is now being worked.  Thank you.
> 
> As for a name, how about the term Chrome uses when you right click a URL 
> bookmark in your library, which is "Show in Folder."  I am not sure how you 
> wish to implement, but if you just open Chrome I think it does it well.  I'm 
> not as happy with their bookmarks mgr as with the FFox Library, but the "show 
> in folder" feature works nicely.  When you click it, you just move to the 
> folder containing the bookmark in question.  The folder is highlighted in the 
> folder tree and all bookmarks in the highlighted folder, including the one 
> you are interested in, are shown.  Check it out.  I would vote for that for 
> Ffox.

I want to make sure that's clear to avoid unintended side effects (like
making the user open the folder themselves). The intended functionality
is that when the button is clicked, the bookmarks library/sidebar/etc
opens the containing folder *on its own* and scrolls down (well, it
doesn't actually do any visible scrolling, but opens to the position in
that folder where the bookmark is) to the bookmark that the user clicked
"Show in Folder" on. As well as opening the folder to where the bookmark
is, the manager also highlights the folder location in the list of
folders/folder tree (which AFAIK it does when you open a folder the
normal way, so it's probably the same code for that).

Basically, it just programmatically opens the folder and then locates
the bookmark.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1672139

Title:
  Add "Open Enclosing Folder" context menu to search results of
  bookmarks in the Library window (link to view/open containing folder,
  parent folder button)

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/firefox/+bug/1672139/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1672139]

2021-08-20 Thread Bugzilla2007
(In reply to Lebar from comment #51)
> I've got some working code that I was going to submit to Phabricator, but I 
> thought that I would check here first on the protocol for context menu 
> changes.  I opted for a "Reveal in Bookmark Tree" context menu entry in the 
> Library that would navigate to the appropriate place in the tree and then 
> highlight the entry in the right-hand panel (this seemed more sensible than 
> devising a new window just to show path).

Hi Lebar, thank you for working on this, that's awesome! The behaviour
sounds good to me (but it's not my call).

The reporter of this bug, `Alex Faaborg [:faaborg] (Firefox UX) ` has
provided some UX feedback in comment 6. `Reveal in Bookmark Tree` sounds
exciting (as in 'Rise the curtain on this bookmark!'), but probably
plain vanilla `Open Containing Folder` will be best for Windows (perhaps
with variations like `Open Enclosing Folder` for other operating
systems, but don't worry about that now). FF also uses `Open Containing
Folder` for downloads when you hover the folder icon.

> Is there some specific vetting process for menu/GUI changes?  Are
there other reviewers other than Mark or Marco that need to be included
in the commits?

Looking at the official owners and peers of the [Bookmark and History 
(Places)](https://wiki.mozilla.org/Modules/Desktop_Firefox#Bookmarks_.26_History)
 module, Mark or Marco should be the right people to review this.
Just file your patch on phabricator first (make sure to link it to this bug by 
filling the bug number in the appropriate field) and set Mark as a reviewer. He 
will certainly advise you on the next steps.

I work for Thunderbird, but I'd love to see this fixed as you can see
from my comments here from time immemorial ;-)

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1672139

Title:
  Add "Open Enclosing Folder" context menu to search results of
  bookmarks in the Library window (link to view/open containing folder,
  parent folder button)

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/firefox/+bug/1672139/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1672139]

2021-08-20 Thread Mwalkington
Romain, can you review and help prioritize this? Thank you.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1672139

Title:
  Add "Open Enclosing Folder" context menu to search results of
  bookmarks in the Library window (link to view/open containing folder,
  parent folder button)

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/firefox/+bug/1672139/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1672139]

2021-08-20 Thread Lebar
Hi Mark,
As per flod, in response to D121040, perhaps you could point me in the right 
direction for getting the correct term to use in the UI (and the code for that 
matter) for this feature.  Since the original suggestion was quite some time 
ago (~12 years), and it seems like "reveal" may not be the ideal term (as used 
in things like "Reveal in Explorer" or "Reveal in Finder").  Thanks.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1672139

Title:
  Add "Open Enclosing Folder" context menu to search results of
  bookmarks in the Library window (link to view/open containing folder,
  parent folder button)

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/firefox/+bug/1672139/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1672139]

2021-08-20 Thread Standard8
(In reply to Lebar from comment #56)
> Hi Mark,
> As per flod, in response to D121040, perhaps you could point me in the right 
> direction for getting the correct term to use in the UI (and the code for 
> that matter) for this feature.  Since the original suggestion was quite some 
> time ago (~12 years), and it seems like "reveal" may not be the ideal term 
> (as used in things like "Reveal in Explorer" or "Reveal in Finder").  Thanks.

Thank you for working on this, it is good to see this moving forward.
I've asked our user experience team to take a look, so I'm passing the
NI over to them.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1672139

Title:
  Add "Open Enclosing Folder" context menu to search results of
  bookmarks in the Library window (link to view/open containing folder,
  parent folder button)

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/firefox/+bug/1672139/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1672139]

2021-08-20 Thread Smayer97
This sounds A LOT like the "Go To Parent Folder" add-on/extension for
older versions of FF. That would be great if you get this to work and
implemented into current FF.

If you can extend it to also work in the Bookmark sidebar, that would be
a boon and truly replicate that aformentioned add-on.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1672139

Title:
  Add "Open Enclosing Folder" context menu to search results of
  bookmarks in the Library window (link to view/open containing folder,
  parent folder button)

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/firefox/+bug/1672139/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1672139]

2021-08-20 Thread Eberger-c
I am so glad to hear this is now being worked.  Thank you.

As for a name, how about the term Chrome uses when you right click a URL
bookmark in your library, which is "Show in Folder."  I am not sure how
you wish to implement, but if you just open Chrome I think it does it
well.  I'm not as happy with their bookmarks mgr as with the FFox
Library, but the "show in folder" feature works nicely.  When you click
it, you just move to the folder containing the bookmark in question.
The folder is highlighted in the folder tree and all bookmarks in the
highlighted folder, including the one you are interested in, are shown.
Check it out.  I would vote for that for Ffox.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1672139

Title:
  Add "Open Enclosing Folder" context menu to search results of
  bookmarks in the Library window (link to view/open containing folder,
  parent folder button)

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/firefox/+bug/1672139/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1672139]

2021-08-20 Thread Smayer97
Alternative names:
- Reveal in Bookmarks
- Show Parent Folder

Again, having this work not only in the Library window but also the
Bookmarks sidebar would be a boon.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1672139

Title:
  Add "Open Enclosing Folder" context menu to search results of
  bookmarks in the Library window (link to view/open containing folder,
  parent folder button)

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/firefox/+bug/1672139/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1672139]

2021-08-20 Thread Standard8
Adding needinfo to Romain as I think that was missed. Note: this is a
patch from a contributor for a long standing paper-cut issue, and we
mainly just need help with an appropriate string.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1672139

Title:
  Add "Open Enclosing Folder" context menu to search results of
  bookmarks in the Library window (link to view/open containing folder,
  parent folder button)

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/firefox/+bug/1672139/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1940079] Re: Strongswan in Focal doesn't support TPM 2.0 through the TSS2 interface...

2021-08-20 Thread Tobias Brunner
> The stable Ubuntu releases are "feature frozen", which means that it
is unlikely TSS2 will be enabled in Focal (exceptions are possible, but
a very compelling reason is needed).

Is it a new feature, though? Couldn't it be considered a necessary fix
to actually make the already shipped tpm plugin (and the tpm_extendpcr
command) functional?

> Did TSS2 work before with Ubuntu's strongswan package? (I doubt so, as
additional build-deps are needed, admittedly I'm not very familiar with
the package.)

As you say, it requires an additional dependency. However, while
strongSwan supports tpm2-tss 1.x, the version shipped in Ubuntu bionic
was too old. So before a 2.x version was included, it couldn't have
worked (looks like Debian didn't include tpm2-tss at all before 2.1.0
was shipped with buster).

Support for TPM 2.0 was added with strongSwan 5.5.0, based on tpm2-tss
1.x (> 1.0). The tpm plugin was originally released with strongSwan
5.5.2. In Debian, the plugin was not enabled until 5.6.1, packaged for
testing before the buster release. Unfortunately, there was no configure
check that enforced enabling tss-tss2 (I've added one now), which would
have failed back then as support for tpm2-tss 2.x was only added with
with 5.7.0. However, Debian buster eventually included strongSwan 5.7.2
and, as mentioned above, tpm2-tss 2.1.0, so that would have worked. But
since the plugin was already enabled successfully months before, nobody
apparently considered enabling tss-tss2, even if the plugin was non-
functional. So it took nearly 4 years since the plugin was first enabled
for somebody to actually try to use it and fail.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1940079

Title:
  Strongswan in Focal doesn't support TPM 2.0 through the TSS2
  interface...

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/strongswan/+bug/1940079/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1672139] Re: Add "Open Enclosing Folder" context menu to search results of bookmarks in the Library window (link to view/open containing folder, parent folder button)

2021-08-20 Thread Bug Watch Updater
** Changed in: firefox
   Status: Confirmed => In Progress

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1672139

Title:
  Add "Open Enclosing Folder" context menu to search results of
  bookmarks in the Library window (link to view/open containing folder,
  parent folder button)

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/firefox/+bug/1672139/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1938678] Re: [intel] [tgl-h][iotg] [hwe-tpm] Ubuntu Core hangs during bootup on TGL-H

2021-08-20 Thread ethan.hsieh
Summary:

1. Still can reproduce the issue (#31) after deleting PK and enrolling 
db/KEK/custom PK vis BIOS settings.
For details, please refer to #38 and [1].

2. Can install the uc20 test image[2][3] with TPM and secure boot enabled on 
other x86 machines (not TGL-H and EHL).
And, I only enrolled KEK and DB via BIOS settings.
For details, please refer to #36

3. When I enroll the key by mokutil, the error message is different from #31.
For details, please refer to #39.

@Chris
Any thoughts on this?
Based on above test results, it looks like #31 is a BIOS issue?

---
[1] https://bugs.launchpad.net/intel/+bug/1939505/comments/3
[2] 
https://github.com/EthanHsieh/secboot/commit/f1b9e1593b2a952be77b63f8b31cc3787b1e3e0d
[3] 
https://github.com/EthanHsieh/go-tpm2/commit/b5a8526eb2402689024c0deeba778733036a3084

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1938678

Title:
  [intel] [tgl-h][iotg] [hwe-tpm] Ubuntu Core hangs during bootup on
  TGL-H

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/intel/+bug/1938678/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1936254]

2021-08-20 Thread Heather Ellsworth
Thanks so much Andrew for your help.

The build system is using shell, not bash. Also it's the find command
that is failing. Currently I'm tinkering with what the find should be,
rather than just reverting the commit.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1936254

Title:
  [snap] 7.2.0.1 build from tarball fails to find modules

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/df-libreoffice/+bug/1936254/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1928047] Re: AX201 BT will cause system could not enter S0i3

2021-08-20 Thread Timo Aaltonen
** Changed in: linux-oem-5.13 (Ubuntu Focal)
   Status: In Progress => Fix Committed

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1928047

Title:
  AX201 BT will cause system could not enter S0i3

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/hwe-next/+bug/1928047/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1921949]

2021-08-20 Thread Olivernicholle9052
The regression happens only when trying to close using + or
+. The save https://www.handysolutionsjcg.com  pop-up shows
properly trying to use File+Close from the File menu.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1921949

Title:
  libreoffice-math save icon reset upon arrow action

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/df-libreoffice/+bug/1921949/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1892145] Re: [SRU] smbclient cannot connect anonymously in Kerberos context (freeipa)

2021-08-20 Thread Paride Legovini
** Description changed:

  This is a Focal-only SRU.
  
  [Impact (from https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14344#c2)]
  
  If there is a problem reading credential cache then smbclient can core
  with double free.
  
  e.g. something like
  
  smbclient -L //foo.bar.com
  
  can result in
  
  Enter TUX-NET\tux's password:
  Failed to resolve credential cache 'DIR:/run/user/1000/krb5cc'! (No 
credentials cache found)
  *** Error in `smbclient': double free or corruption (fasttop): 
0x560cd2ea8890 ***
  Aborted (core dumped)
  
  [Test Plan]
  
  Setting up a reproducer is not easy as the crash is not 100%
  reproducible, however the samba package ships with autopkgtests which
- can be used for regression testing.
+ can be used for regression testing of the "base" samba functionalities,
+ but they do not cover integration with Kerberos. Proper testing requires
+ setting up a krb5 and making samba authenticate against with when the
+ krb5 credential cache is unresolved.
  
  Test PPA (amd64, ppc64el, s390x):
  
  https://launchpad.net/~paride/+archive/ubuntu/samba-lp1892145
  
  [Regression Potential]
  
  The patch is a cherry-pick from upstream and has a little and well
  defined scope: it removes a free() in a given situation. The patch is a
  cherry-pick from upstream and has already been released in stable
  upstream branches and as such it's already shipped in a stable release
  of Ubuntu (Hirsute), in the current devel release (Impish) and in Debian
  Bullseye (currently testing). Therefore it can be considered field
  tested. The patch doesn't modify the behavior of any interface or user-
  facing component.
  
  The regression potential can be considered low.
  
  [Development Fix]
  
  The patch is included in the following upstream and Ubuntu releases:
  
   * >= 4.11.9
   * >= 4.12.3
   * >= 4.13.0 (>= Hirsute)
  
  [Original Description]
  
  It is not possible anymore to connect anonymously to a Samba server, if
  there is a Kerberos environment. It does not matter if there is a valid
  Kerberos ticket or not. I'm using FreeIPA.
  
  This is with smbclient 2:4.11.6+dfsg-0ubuntu1.4
  For example,
  
  $ smbclient -L '//dist.ghs.nl/space' -N
  Failed to resolve credential cache 'KEYRING:persistent:60001'! (Unknown 
credential cache type)
  free(): double free detected in tcache 2
  Aborted (core dumped)
  
  On Ubuntu 18.04, with smbclient 2:4.7.6+dfsg~ubuntu-0ubuntu2.18 it works
  as expected (albeit with many messages about failing krb5_init_context
  and smb_krb5_context_init_basic)
  
  The combination Samba + FreeIPA + Ubuntu has never worked since I
  started using FreeIPA a few years ago. But anonymous access to a Samba
  server did work, until I switched to Ubuntu 20.04.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1892145

Title:
  [SRU] smbclient cannot connect anonymously in Kerberos context
  (freeipa)

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/samba/+bug/1892145/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1844453]

2021-08-20 Thread Libreoffice-commits
Christian Lohmaier committed a patch related to this issue.
It has been pushed to "master":

https://git.libreoffice.org/core/commit/73041de9563c9a973d1b5394c6e5520a7d799980

tdf#101630 - gdrive support w/oAuth and Drive API v3

It will be available in 7.3.0.

The patch should be included in the daily builds available at
https://dev-builds.libreoffice.org/daily/ in the next 24-48 hours. More
information about daily builds can be found at:
https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Testing_Daily_Builds

Affected users are encouraged to test the fix and report feedback.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1844453

Title:
  [upstream] Access to the Google remote account does not work

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/df-libreoffice/+bug/1844453/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1844453]

2021-08-20 Thread Mikekaganski
(In reply to Commit Notification from comment #80)
> The patch should be included in the daily builds available at
> https://dev-builds.libreoffice.org/daily/ in the next 24-48 hours.
> ...
> Affected users are encouraged to test the fix and report feedback.

Please note that daily builds are created without necessary
configurations parameters, so those builds do not include gdrive
support: this means that they can't be used for testing of the patches
mentioned in comments 80 and 81.

OTOH, 7.2.0 RC2 is going to be available soon. Please wait for the
release candidate for testing.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1844453

Title:
  [upstream] Access to the Google remote account does not work

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/df-libreoffice/+bug/1844453/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1844453]

2021-08-20 Thread Libreoffice-commits
Christian Lohmaier committed a patch related to this issue.
It has been pushed to "libreoffice-7-2":

https://git.libreoffice.org/core/commit/b8b66a26f8f519a30b8e6b860a9247a8ffbb71cc

tdf#101630 - gdrive support w/oAuth and Drive API v3

It will be available in 7.2.0.2.

The patch should be included in the daily builds available at
https://dev-builds.libreoffice.org/daily/ in the next 24-48 hours. More
information about daily builds can be found at:
https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Testing_Daily_Builds

Affected users are encouraged to test the fix and report feedback.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1844453

Title:
  [upstream] Access to the Google remote account does not work

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/df-libreoffice/+bug/1844453/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1844453]

2021-08-20 Thread Libreoffice-commits
Christian Lohmaier committed a patch related to this issue.
It has been pushed to "libreoffice-7-1":

https://git.libreoffice.org/core/commit/854c03ebc94aae205b85d0c9d342048baf93e9a9

tdf#101630 - gdrive support w/oAuth and Drive API v3

It will be available in 7.1.6.

The patch should be included in the daily builds available at
https://dev-builds.libreoffice.org/daily/ in the next 24-48 hours. More
information about daily builds can be found at:
https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Testing_Daily_Builds

Affected users are encouraged to test the fix and report feedback.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1844453

Title:
  [upstream] Access to the Google remote account does not work

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/df-libreoffice/+bug/1844453/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1844453]

2021-08-20 Thread Cloph-0
Some hints/remarks to the fix:

* the initial repository-add dialogs have not been adjusted yet, they
still ask for username and password, however those are not used. The
username field is for LO's own distinguishing between different
instances, but not used in the authentication. You can leave the
password empty, it is not used to authenticate.

* to allow storing of the refresh token, you should enable persistent
storage of credentials in Tools|Options → LO → Security → [x] allow
persistent storage and [x] protect with master password. With that LO
can store the refresh-token to use for further requests, and you only
have to provide the master password.

* With the persistent storage enabled, and trying to setup the
connection for the first time, LO will ask for the masterpassword to
look for an existing refresh token, on first setup there obviously won't
be one so it will go to the login procedure: Copy'n'paste the link to
your browser, grant LibreOffice the access to files → You will get an
access token that you copy back to the LibreOffice dialog. LibreOffice
will then ask once more for the masterpassword to store the refresh
token obtained using the access-token.

Also important: LO is not verified to use restricted scopes yet, so it
can only use drive.file scope, meaning when accessing GDrive from LO
you'll only see the files that you created with LibreOffice, other files
will not be accessible (you will however be able to see the files
created with LO in e.g. in your gdrive in browser)

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1844453

Title:
  [upstream] Access to the Google remote account does not work

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/df-libreoffice/+bug/1844453/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1844453]

2021-08-20 Thread Heiko-tietze-g
(In reply to Commit Notification from comment #81)
> Christian Lohmaier committed a patch related to this issue.

Resolved fixed? Thanks for the detailed explanation.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1844453

Title:
  [upstream] Access to the Google remote account does not work

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/df-libreoffice/+bug/1844453/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1492621] Re: Cannot start VMs without routable IPv4 address

2021-08-20 Thread Bug Watch Updater
Launchpad has imported 17 comments from the remote bug at
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12398.

If you reply to an imported comment from within Launchpad, your comment
will be sent to the remote bug automatically. Read more about
Launchpad's inter-bugtracker facilities at
https://help.launchpad.net/InterBugTracking.


On 2011-01-13T20:03:04+00:00 Tore Anderson wrote:

getaddrinfo() will disregard the loopback addresses ::1 and 127.0.0.1
when attempting to figure out which address families are present on the
host, when being called with the AI_ADDRCONFIG flag.

This makes a lot of sense when looking up an external hostname.
However, it makes very little sense when connecting to the hostname
"localhost".  I've learned that the browser vendors will avoid using
AI_ADDRCONFIG or do it while using workarounds for the localhost case,
see for instance:

https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=614526

Without such a workaround, connecting to a IPv4-only service listening
on 127.0.0.1 using the hostname "localhost" will fail unless the machine
also has external IPv4 connectivity.  Which is not what a user would
expect, since the (lack of) external connectivity is irrelevant to the
accessibility to the loopback interface.

Therefore, when looking up "localhost", the loopback addresses ::1 and
127.0.0.1 should not be ignored by getaddrinfo() when using
AI_ADDRCONFIG

Tore

Reply at:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/qemu/+bug/1492621/comments/0


On 2012-07-27T14:11:30+00:00 Psimerda wrote:

The same applies to *all* link-local IPv6 addresses as well as link-
local IPv4 addresses.

The same applies for all alternative names for localhost:

For example on Fedora:

127.0.0.1   localhost localhost.localdomain localhost4 localhost4.localdomain4
::1 localhost localhost.localdomain localhost6 localhost6.localdomain6

People even use FQDNs for their localhost address to test their stuff without
network connection.

See also comments in bug 12377.

Reply at:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/qemu/+bug/1492621/comments/1


On 2012-07-28T10:12:58+00:00 Psimerda wrote:

Currently with glibc-2.15-51.fc17.x86_64 I can reproduce it with:

  hints.ai_family = AF_INET6;
  hints.ai_flags = AI_ADDRCONFIG; // and optional AI_V4MAPPED

I can no longer reproduce with SSH (possibly because of some updates
that affect SSH's networking, i don't know).

My feeling is that we should *never* discard literal IP adresses
based on AI_ADDRCONFIG. At least not unless we check against
*family* together with *scope* but even then it's very doubtful
to go directly against user's input.

As for names like 'localhost', 'localhost4' and various names you can
use for node-local and link-local addresses, I'm strictly against trying
to enumerate them as you cannot guess all possible names. Would
you for example check the suffix ".local" and treat the result as a
link-local FQDN? But it may be a global address also.

I actually don't believe in any checks that work with the name and
not the address. When you have the address, you can check it against
several rules to guess (and usually know) the scope.

Reply at:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/qemu/+bug/1492621/comments/2


On 2012-09-22T15:42:40+00:00 Psimerda wrote:

Created attachment 6647
a temporary fix to ignore the whole AI_ADDRCONFIG thing

Until this issue is resolved, I'm building GLIBC with this patch to
avoid problems with node-local and link-local networking.

Reply at:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/qemu/+bug/1492621/comments/3


On 2012-11-20T23:13:20+00:00 Psimerda wrote:

By the way, I just learned that the current behavior is not mandated by
POSIX. Thanks to Jeff Law for valuable information he provided:

http://pubs.opengroup.org/onlinepubs/9699919799/

If the AI_ADDRCONFIG flag is specified, IPv4 addresses shall be returned
only if an IPv4 address is configured on the local system, [IP6] [Option
Start]  and IPv6 addresses shall be returned only if an IPv6 address is
configured on the local system. [Option End]

Jeff: It may also be the case that we need to involve the "Austin Group"
if we need further clarification of the standard (link-local handling
comes to mind).

My summary is:

Filtering of non-DNS addresses in getaddrinfo() has no real use
and it only causes problems. There's no reason to filter over the
mere existence of addresses. Filtering over global address existence
may only be desirable for global address resolution, which is DNS. But
that should be done by the DNS resolver that only asks for addresses
that make sense and only accepts addresses that it as

[Bug 1481835]

2021-08-20 Thread Dianeberlusconi
Really outstanding, helpful stuff.

RJ | https://alhambracustomcabinets.com/kitchen-cabinets

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1481835

Title:
  [UPSTREAM] Unable to group raster image(s) with drawing object(s)

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/df-libreoffice/+bug/1481835/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1940634] [NEW] needs rebuild for GCC 11

2021-08-20 Thread Kunal Mehta
Public bug reported:

libxapian-dev needs to be rebuilt with GCC 11 in impish, otherwise it
emits warnings when you try to compile other things with the now-default
GCC 11 with it:

...
[9/61] c++ -Itest/library.p -I/usr/include/x86_64-linux-gnu 
-I/usr/include/p11-kit-1 -fdiagnostics-color=always -pipe 
-D_FILE_OFFSET_BITS=64 -Wall -Winvalid-pch -Wnon-virtual-dtor -Werror 
-std=c++11 -g -O2 
'-ffile-prefix-map=/<>/libkiwix-10.0.0+git202108071333.83e757a~impish=.'
 -flto=auto -ffat-lto-objects -fstack-protector-strong -Wformat 
-Werror=format-security -Wdate-time -D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2 -DGTEST_HAS_PTHREAD=1 
-pthread -MD -MQ test/library.p/library.cpp.o -MF 
test/library.p/library.cpp.o.d -o test/library.p/library.cpp.o -c 
../test/library.cpp
[10/61] c++ -Isrc/libkiwix.so.10.0.0.p -Isrc -I../src -Iinclude -I../include 
-I/usr/include/kainjow -Istatic -I/usr/include/x86_64-linux-gnu 
-I/usr/include/p11-kit-1 -fdiagnostics-color=always -pipe 
-D_FILE_OFFSET_BITS=64 -Wall -Winvalid-pch -Wnon-virtual-dtor -Werror 
-std=c++11 -g -O2 
'-ffile-prefix-map=/<>/libkiwix-10.0.0+git202108071333.83e757a~impish=.'
 -flto=auto -ffat-lto-objects -fstack-protector-strong -Wformat 
-Werror=format-security -Wdate-time -D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2 -fPIC -pthread -MD -MQ 
src/libkiwix.so.10.0.0.p/library.cpp.o -MF 
src/libkiwix.so.10.0.0.p/library.cpp.o.d -o 
src/libkiwix.so.10.0.0.p/library.cpp.o -c ../src/library.cpp
FAILED: src/libkiwix.so.10.0.0.p/library.cpp.o 
c++ -Isrc/libkiwix.so.10.0.0.p -Isrc -I../src -Iinclude -I../include 
-I/usr/include/kainjow -Istatic -I/usr/include/x86_64-linux-gnu 
-I/usr/include/p11-kit-1 -fdiagnostics-color=always -pipe 
-D_FILE_OFFSET_BITS=64 -Wall -Winvalid-pch -Wnon-virtual-dtor -Werror 
-std=c++11 -g -O2 
'-ffile-prefix-map=/<>/libkiwix-10.0.0+git202108071333.83e757a~impish=.'
 -flto=auto -ffat-lto-objects -fstack-protector-strong -Wformat 
-Werror=format-security -Wdate-time -D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2 -fPIC -pthread -MD -MQ 
src/libkiwix.so.10.0.0.p/library.cpp.o -MF 
src/libkiwix.so.10.0.0.p/library.cpp.o.d -o 
src/libkiwix.so.10.0.0.p/library.cpp.o -c ../src/library.cpp
In file included from /usr/include/xapian.h:44,
 from ../src/library.cpp:35:
/usr/include/xapian/version.h:29:2: error: #warning The C++ ABI version of 
compiler you are using does not exactly match [-Werror=cpp]
   29 | #warning The C++ ABI version of compiler you are using does not exactly 
match
  |  ^~~
/usr/include/xapian/version.h:30:2: error: #warning that of the compiler used 
to build the library. If linking fails [-Werror=cpp]
   30 | #warning that of the compiler used to build the library. If linking 
fails
  |  ^~~
/usr/include/xapian/version.h:31:2: error: #warning due to missing symbols, 
this is probably the reason why. [-Werror=cpp]
   31 | #warning due to missing symbols, this is probably the reason why.
  |  ^~~
/usr/include/xapian/version.h:32:2: error: #warning The Xapian library was 
built with g++ 10.2.1 [-Werror=cpp]
   32 | #warning The Xapian library was built with g++ 10.2.1
  |  ^~~
cc1plus: all warnings being treated as errors
[11/61] c++ -Isrc/libkiwix.so.10.0.0.p -Isrc -I../src -Iinclude -I../include 
-I/usr/include/kainjow -Istatic -I/usr/include/x86_64-linux-gnu 
-I/usr/include/p11-kit-1 -fdiagnostics-color=always -pipe 
-D_FILE_OFFSET_BITS=64 -Wall -Winvalid-pch -Wnon-virtual-dtor -Werror 
-std=c++11 -g -O2 
'-ffile-prefix-map=/<>/libkiwix-10.0.0+git202108071333.83e757a~impish=.'
 -flto=auto -ffat-lto-objects -fstack-protector-strong -Wformat 
-Werror=format-security -Wdate-time -D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2 -fPIC -pthread -MD -MQ 
src/libkiwix.so.10.0.0.p/downloader.cpp.o -MF 
src/libkiwix.so.10.0.0.p/downloader.cpp.o.d -o 
src/libkiwix.so.10.0.0.p/downloader.cpp.o -c ../src/downloader.cpp
[12/61] c++ -Isrc/libkiwix.so.10.0.0.p -Isrc -I../src -Iinclude -I../include 
-I/usr/include/kainjow -Istatic -I/usr/include/x86_64-linux-gnu 
-I/usr/include/p11-kit-1 -fdiagnostics-color=always -pipe 
-D_FILE_OFFSET_BITS=64 -Wall -Winvalid-pch -Wnon-virtual-dtor -Werror 
-std=c++11 -g -O2 
'-ffile-prefix-map=/<>/libkiwix-10.0.0+git202108071333.83e757a~impish=.'
 -flto=auto -ffat-lto-objects -fstack-protector-strong -Wformat 
-Werror=format-security -Wdate-time -D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2 -fPIC -pthread -MD -MQ 
src/libkiwix.so.10.0.0.p/reader.cpp.o -MF 
src/libkiwix.so.10.0.0.p/reader.cpp.o.d -o 
src/libkiwix.so.10.0.0.p/reader.cpp.o -c ../src/reader.cpp
[13/61] c++ -Isrc/libkiwix.so.10.0.0.p -Isrc -I../src -Iinclude -I../include 
-I/usr/include/kainjow -Istatic -I/usr/include/x86_64-linux-gnu 
-I/usr/include/p11-kit-1 -fdiagnostics-color=always -pipe 
-D_FILE_OFFSET_BITS=64 -Wall -Winvalid-pch -Wnon-virtual-dtor -Werror 
-std=c++11 -g -O2 
'-ffile-prefix-map=/<>/libkiwix-10.0.0+git202108071333.83e757a~impish=.'
 -flto=auto -ffat-lto-objects -fstack-protector-strong -Wformat 
-Werror=format-security -Wdate-time -D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2 -fPIC -pthread -MD -MQ 
src/libkiwix.so.10.0.0.p/opds_dum

[Bug 1940610] Re: Fix mic noise on HP ProBook 445 G8

2021-08-20 Thread Timo Aaltonen
** Changed in: linux-oem-5.13 (Ubuntu Focal)
   Status: Confirmed => Fix Committed

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1940610

Title:
   Fix mic noise on HP ProBook 445 G8

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/hwe-next/+bug/1940610/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1940505] Re: monero FTBFS on riscv64

2021-08-20 Thread Bug Watch Updater
Launchpad has imported 10 comments from the remote bug at
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25181.

If you reply to an imported comment from within Launchpad, your comment
will be sent to the remote bug automatically. Read more about
Launchpad's inter-bugtracker facilities at
https://help.launchpad.net/InterBugTracking.


On 2019-11-10T03:31:16+00:00 Yitingwang16 wrote:

If there are two callers in two .text sections (for example sections A,
B), followed by two sections with R_RISCV_ALIGN type relocations
(section C, D), then followed by the called functions in sections behind
(section E), there is a chance to reproduce the issue.

I draw a picture to illustrate the problem:

   
   high|   |
^   -> | section E: cc, dd | <-
|   |  |___|  |
|   |  |   |  |
|   |  | section D: align2 (R_RISCV_ALIGN) |  |
|   |  |___|  |
|   |  |   |  |
|   |  | section C: align1 (R_RISCV_ALIGN) |  |
|   |  |___|  |
|   |  |   |  |
|   |  | section B : ff  (R_RISCV_CALL)|--
|   |  |___|
|   |  |   |
  address low   -- | section A : _start (R_RISCV_CALL) |
   |___|

Consider this situation: Section A, B, C, D, E are linked in sequence.
Section C and D have R_RISCV_ALIGN type relocations. Function _start()
calls function cc(), function ff() calls dd(). The size of each section
is 8, 8, 64, 0xfffbc, 10 bytes before relaxation.

In the first relaxation pass (info->relax_pass ==0), the R_RISCV_CALL
relocations in section A and B couldn't be relaxed to R_RISCV_JAL,
because the call from _start() to cc() and the call from ff() to dd()
don't fit with 21-bit offset. The offset is 0x10001c indeed. In the
first relaxation pass, nothing is done.

In the third relaxation pass (info->relax_pass ==2), the R_RISCV_ALIGN
relocations in section C and D could be relaxed. The sizes of section C
and D were changed to 34 and 0xfffba bytes. Now, the offset of the call
from _start() to cc() is 0xe, the offset from ff() to dd() equals to
this value too.

In the second round of relaxation, in the first pass (info->relax_pass ==0), 
the R_RISCV_CALL relocation in section A could be relaxed to R_RISCV_JAL. After 
the relaxation, section A's size is reduced by 4 bytes. So, section B's base 
address and every symbol go down 4 bytes forward. However section C, D and E 
will not go down 4 bytes, because of the .balign restriction placed in section 
C and D.
But, when linker processes the relaxation of section B, it uses the original 
section B symbol addresses to calculate the offset of R_RISCV_CALL relocation 
(from ff() to dd()). The offset is within 1M bytes offset (0xe).  So, the 
R_RISCV_CALL relocation is relaxed to R_RISCV_JAL. This is a mistake!
When linker finally performs the relocation (in perform_relocation()), the 
section B's symbol has been adjusted, then the bug is exposed.

I created a simple test case to trigger this issue:

riscv64-unknown-linux-gnu-gcc -nostdlib -o a.out a.s align_1.s align_2.s c.s
/tmp/ccgFgKhw.o: In function `ff':
(.text+0x0): relocation truncated to fit: R_RISCV_JAL against symbol `dd' 
defined in .text section in /tmp/ccR0Ha6r.o

Reply at:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/monero/+bug/1940505/comments/0


On 2019-11-10T03:37:51+00:00 Yitingwang16 wrote:

Created attachment 12070
test case

Reply at:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/monero/+bug/1940505/comments/1


On 2019-11-10T03:40:31+00:00 Yitingwang16 wrote:

I have a fix locally which changes the common ld/ldlang.c. I can post to
binutils mailing list for review.

I am not sure whether there is a possibility of a similar problem
occurring *between* passes instead of within a single pass. I.e. what if
a call in B is within range and so gets relaxed in one pass, then in a
later pass B moves down due to relaxation in a previous section - but
the destination stays in the same place due to alignment? Is that
possible?

Reply at:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/monero/+bug/1940505/comments/2


On 2019-11-10T05:13:03+00:00 Yitingwang16 wrote:

I've not figured out how to send a proper patch to binutils mailing
list.

github is much easier. See https://github.com/riscv/riscv

[Bug 1939937] Re: ath10k: "add target IRAM recovery feature support" breaks QCA9984 Firmware load capability

2021-08-20 Thread You-Sheng Yang
Hi, don't worry. linux/focal here means 5.4-generic, which is certainly
not affected. linux/hirsute will then become the basis of hwe-5.11 in
focal. So as long as linux/hirsute is being worked on, you'll have the
fix in hwe-5.11/focal later.

Since the results are positive as expected, I'll send out SRU patches
later.

** Changed in: linux (Ubuntu Hirsute)
   Status: New => In Progress

** Changed in: linux (Ubuntu Hirsute)
   Importance: Undecided => High

** Changed in: linux (Ubuntu Hirsute)
 Assignee: (unassigned) => You-Sheng Yang (vicamo)

** Changed in: linux (Ubuntu Impish)
   Status: Triaged => In Progress

** Changed in: linux (Ubuntu Impish)
   Importance: Undecided => High

** Changed in: linux (Ubuntu Impish)
 Assignee: (unassigned) => You-Sheng Yang (vicamo)

** Changed in: linux-oem-5.13 (Ubuntu Focal)
   Status: New => In Progress

** Changed in: linux-oem-5.13 (Ubuntu Focal)
   Importance: Undecided => High

** Changed in: linux-oem-5.13 (Ubuntu Focal)
 Assignee: (unassigned) => You-Sheng Yang (vicamo)

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1939937

Title:
  ath10k: "add target IRAM recovery feature support" breaks QCA9984
  Firmware load capability

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/1939937/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1938735] Re: Can't insert a row into a OpenOffice calc file

2021-08-20 Thread Bug Watch Updater
Launchpad has imported 17 comments from the remote bug at
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=143940.

If you reply to an imported comment from within Launchpad, your comment
will be sent to the remote bug automatically. Read more about
Launchpad's inter-bugtracker facilities at
https://help.launchpad.net/InterBugTracking.


On 2021-08-18T16:09:19+00:00 Heather Ellsworth wrote:

Created attachment 174389
faulty-spreadsheet

Here is a spreadsheet that is 897 rows and 9 columns that is really
nothing fancy. If you add a line anywhere in the middle of the existing
lines (insert above or below) and then try to save the change, the
spreadsheet crashes.

There is no crash after adding columns or sheets... just lines. And you
can add a line at the end of the text and save just fine. The crash only
occurs when you add a line in the middle of the sheet and try to save.

I've tried creating a new spreadsheet of equal size and cannot reproduce
the issue so I'm not sure what is special about this spreadsheet that
causes the crash.

The issue was reported in launchpad based off of Ubuntu 20.04 and
Libreoffice 6.4.7 but it happens easily on 7.1.5 and 7.2.0 rc3.

The corresponding launchpad bug:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libreoffice/+bug/1938735

I'll attach the faulty spreadsheet as well as the user's system state
information (remember this is relative to 6.4.7, but the same thing
happens on 7.2.0)

Reply at:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libreoffice/+bug/1938735/comments/7


On 2021-08-18T16:10:05+00:00 Heather Ellsworth wrote:

Created attachment 174390
stacktrace signature

Reply at:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libreoffice/+bug/1938735/comments/8


On 2021-08-18T16:10:25+00:00 Heather Ellsworth wrote:

Created attachment 174391
top of stacktrace

Reply at:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libreoffice/+bug/1938735/comments/9


On 2021-08-18T16:10:49+00:00 Heather Ellsworth wrote:

Created attachment 174392
segv analysis

Reply at:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libreoffice/+bug/1938735/comments/10


On 2021-08-18T16:11:11+00:00 Heather Ellsworth wrote:

Created attachment 174393
registers

Reply at:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libreoffice/+bug/1938735/comments/11


On 2021-08-18T16:11:30+00:00 Heather Ellsworth wrote:

Created attachment 174394
proc status

Reply at:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libreoffice/+bug/1938735/comments/12


On 2021-08-18T16:11:48+00:00 Heather Ellsworth wrote:

Created attachment 174395
proc maps

Reply at:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libreoffice/+bug/1938735/comments/13


On 2021-08-18T16:12:42+00:00 Heather Ellsworth wrote:

Created attachment 174396
faulty-spreadsheet

Reply at:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libreoffice/+bug/1938735/comments/14


On 2021-08-18T16:45:35+00:00 Miguelangelrv wrote:

I cannot repro with
Version: 7.2.0.4 (x64) / LibreOffice Community
Build ID: 9a9c6381e3f7a62afc1329bd359cc48accb6435b
CPU threads: 4; OS: Windows 10.0 Build 21390; UI render: Skia/Vulkan; VCL: win
Locale: es-ES (es_ES); UI: en-US Calc: CL

Please test with a clean profile, Menu/Help/Restart in Safe Mode

Reply at:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libreoffice/+bug/1938735/comments/15


On 2021-08-18T19:44:45+00:00 Heather Ellsworth wrote:

I did not test with Windows and unfortunately I don't have a Windows
environment for testing, but the issue is present in Ubuntu 20.04 and
newer.

Reply at:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libreoffice/+bug/1938735/comments/16


On 2021-08-19T03:46:03+00:00 Qa-admin-q wrote:

[Automated Action] NeedInfo-To-Unconfirmed

Reply at:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libreoffice/+bug/1938735/comments/18


On 2021-08-19T08:47:58+00:00 timur wrote:

No repro 6.1, repro LO 6.2, 7.2.0 and 7.3+ master in Win 7 64-bit and Lin GTK3 
Mint 19 64-bit. Regression.
I added a row above 828.

Reply at:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libreoffice/+bug/1938735/comments/19


On 2021-08-19T08:53:18+00:0

[Bug 1937978] Re: New device IDs for Intel ADL-M

2021-08-20 Thread Timo Aaltonen
** Changed in: linux-oem-5.13 (Ubuntu Focal)
   Status: In Progress => Fix Committed

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1937978

Title:
  New device IDs for Intel ADL-M

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/hwe-next/+bug/1937978/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1926312] Re: Please add the new rif_Ma locale

2021-08-20 Thread Bug Watch Updater
Launchpad has imported 2 comments from the remote bug at
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27781.

If you reply to an imported comment from within Launchpad, your comment
will be sent to the remote bug automatically. Read more about
Launchpad's inter-bugtracker facilities at
https://help.launchpad.net/InterBugTracking.


On 2021-04-27T15:09:08+00:00 Ilyahoo Proshel wrote:

Created attachment 13401
rif_MA locale file

Dear maintainers,

Please find attached the locale definition for "Tarifit language locale
for Morocco" to be considered for inclusion in glibc.

Thanks!

Reply at:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/glibc/+bug/1926312/comments/0


On 2021-08-17T17:11:34+00:00 Ilyahoo Proshel wrote:

Created attachment 13620
rif_MA updated locale file

We update the names and text in the locale file

Reply at:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/glibc/+bug/1926312/comments/7


** Changed in: glibc
   Status: Unknown => New

** Changed in: glibc
   Importance: Unknown => Wishlist

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1926312

Title:
  Please add the new rif_Ma locale

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/glibc/+bug/1926312/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1844453] Re: [upstream] Access to the Google remote account does not work

2021-08-20 Thread Bug Watch Updater
** Changed in: df-libreoffice
   Status: Confirmed => In Progress

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1844453

Title:
  [upstream] Access to the Google remote account does not work

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/df-libreoffice/+bug/1844453/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

  1   2   3   4   5   >